Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

Poland’s President Duda Vetoes 2024 Bill Over Media Control – BNN Breaking

Polish President Andrzej Duda Vetoes 2024 Spending Bill in Response to Media Control Changes

In an unprecedented move, Polands President Andrzej Duda has vetoed the 2024 spending bill, forming a palpable rift in the countrys political landscape. The veto is a pointed response to the recent actions of the new government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, which assumed control of the countrys public media.

President Dudas decision to veto the spending bill underscores his palpable disapproval of the changes implemented in public media management. The veto is a clear reflection of the escalating tensions between the presidency and the government, particularly around control over media institutions. The situation brings to the fore the critical role of media independence in maintaining a balanced power dynamic within the Polish government.

President Dudas rejection of the spending bill marks a significant development in Polands political sphere. It signals the potential for ongoing political conflicts within the countrys leadership. The move is likely to lead to further discussions and negotiations among Polands political actors as they grapple with differing views on media control and fiscal policy. The veto, which President Duda cites as a response to a gross violation of the constitution, will undoubtedly deepen the existing standoff over state television.

The Tusk government, which came to power in December 2023, has been instrumental in the controversial takeover of public media. The new administrations action to seize control of public media was widely condemned as illegal. The governments decision to replace the CEOs of state media and institute a 30% pay increase for teachers has been met with staunch opposition by President Duda, culminating in the veto of the spending bill. The public media shakeup is viewed by many as an attempt by the new government to consolidate power, leading to accusations of turning Polish public media into partisan propaganda outlets.

Read the original post:
Poland's President Duda Vetoes 2024 Bill Over Media Control - BNN Breaking

Israeli media failed to manipulate truth this time, says media union head | News – Yeni afak English

Secretary-general of the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU) said that Israel always attempts to control the media and narrative, but it will not succeed this time.

Describing the events in Gaza as "heartbreaking," ABU Secretary-General Ahmed Nadeem told Anadolu: It's extremely inhuman what is being done in Gaza. I think, this time, they are not able to control the narrative. Everybody knows what is going on. The truth is very much clear through other media that's available to people."

Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union is the world's largest broadcasting association.

Nadeem emphasized: As media entities we should be strong, we should go with the truth and we should explain the truth to the people.

Reminding that everyone can easily access the news they want today, Nadeem said it is important for the media to play a guiding role in determining what the truth is, distinguishing between the right and wrong information.

Nadeem noted that media organizations and news agencies in Asia, especially in Trkiye, have done an excellent job regarding what is happening in Gaza.

Drawing attention to Israel's media 'manipulations,' Nadeem said: "(Israel) always try to control the media, control the narrative. But this time, it's not going to work. Because this time everybody knows what is the truth. And this truth is always available around us through social media and other platforms. So this time the narrative won't change."

Nadeem stated that conveying the truth to the public is the best activity that can be done and emphasized that the media should operate on this principle.

Touching upon the role of artificial intelligence in the media, Nadeem said despite the existence of individuals who misuse artificial intelligence and generate a lot of misinformation, it is possible to use this new tool correctly, and everyone needs to be educated on this matter.

Link:
Israeli media failed to manipulate truth this time, says media union head | News - Yeni afak English

Public Employees: "They Control Everything We Say on Social Media" – Confidencial

Enrique says he's been having nightmares for several days. Most of the dreams involve police officers. He explains that "he is feeling very paranoid and afraid," a sensation that, according to him, he shares with the majority of government employees due to the wave of dismissals, constant interrogations and imprisonments prescribed by the dictatorship of Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo. But added to that is a new form of control: social media.

"We knew they were watching us, but in the last few weeks they have started being more vigilant of our social media accounts. They monitor everything we do personally, and now also virtually," says Enrique.

This young man, who works in an office of the Judiciary branch in Managua, says there are several people "who have been fired for posting something on social media that provokes [the regime's] discomfort."

Enrique describes the work environment as challenging because "you don't know what you can and can't say on social media." Some workers have even stopped posting or have simply closed their accounts.

"But even doing that can provoke [their] ire. With these people, you never know," he warns.

Since April 2018, the Ortega-Murillo regime has imposed a reign of terror on public employees. Workers raising their voices, demanding their rights, or criticizing the government is unthinkable. But social media, which was, for many, "an escape valve," is now an increasingly dangerous terrain.

"In my case, I only had Facebook, but at the insistence of my bosses I had to create a Twitter [now X] account in 2018, because we were urged [to post there] in order to gain ground on social media at a time when the complaints of [human rights] violations were being reported by thousands of Nicaraguans," Enrique explains.

Enrique recalls that one of his office colleagues was threatened during the COVID-19 pandemic for posting about taking precautions to avoid getting infected. In a meeting, they showed him his Facebook posts and accused him of being a "traitor." He became so afraid that he left Nicaragua a few weeks later.

"They've fired people just for publishing memes," says Enrique, who believes that the level of control the dictatorship is trying to impose "is crazy."

Enrique also says that most of the hundreds of workers dismissed from the Judiciary had their personal phones confiscated. "We assume that they have been checking everything the workers had on [their phones], from calls and photos to social media," he added.

After more than 12 years of working for the Ministry of Education, Marcela, a schoolteacher in southern Nicaragua, says she is bothered by the fact that teachers can't express themselves freely "about any subject."

"There are some who have been issued warnings for posting photos of Catholic processions. The most recent thing is that we've been banned from talking about Miss Universe," Marcela complains.

Marcela says that when Sheynnis Palacios was crowned Miss Universe on the night of November 18, many people took to the streets to celebrate and post on social media. "I was one of them. We went out in a caravan through several municipalities because we felt it was such an immense joy for all of Nicaragua," she explains.

However, she says that the dictatorship's discourse has changed, and that they went from "pretending to celebrate, to actually threatening" anyone who spoke on the subject.

"They have even imprisoned the Sandinista Tik Toker 'Tropi Kong' for having criticized the presenters on a pro-government [TV] channel. With that you understand that in the dictators' eyes no one can criticize, not even the servile ones who kiss their feet," says Marcela.

In her case, Marcela chose to make all her Facebook posts private. "But nothing guarantees that there isn't surveillance by someone who might want to inform on me, so I have deleted [a lot of] posts and I have chosen to not post almost anything," she laments.

Marcela comments that some fellow teachers have taken on pseudonyms or created new accounts on social media. "But the fear of being watched in some way is always there," she insists.

"In our offices there are people watching us, in our computers they've installed programs to spy on us, our social media is being watched all the time. Although they don't admit it, it's obvious that it happens," says Raul, a government employee in Managua.

Although he considers himself a Sandinista, Raul says he is disappointed in the "hijacking" of the party by the Ortega Murillo family.

Raul says that on several occasions the staff has been summoned to a session to receive talks on social media. "But what they're doing is telling us that we have to post government propaganda because according to them, we have to share all the good news with the people," he recalls.

However, he says there are also many other stories of layoffs over the course of the 10 years he has been working for the government.

"One woman was fired because she shared a meme of Chayo [Rosario Murillo], and another because she shared a photo with a joke about Daniel Ortega," recalls Raul. However, he adds that "none of the posts were offensive."

For Raul, the dictatorship "has no sense of humor" and "they want to have control over us, in how we think and even what we say, whether in the street, at home, at work, or on social media."

In mid-2023, government workers began to receive home visits from the dictatorship's political operators to confirm if they were still Sandinista "militants" (members) and to ask them about their involvement in marches and party activities.

CONFIDENCIAL reported that these visits were made to the homes of public employees who in 2020 had been pressured to get themselves and their family members accredited as Sandinista party militants. "Last year, in June, we received information that government workers were required to get five more people signed up, so now they were checking to see if they are still active," said a source from the Blue and White Monitoring Group.

Then in mid-November 2023, it was reported on social media and via independent media outlets that the dictatorship is forcing all state workers, as well as current party members, to fill out a "single registration form" to obtain militancy status in the context of the upcoming 45th anniversary of the Sandinista revolution.

The registration form requires applicants to provide information such as telephone numbers, email addresses, and social media account information for Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. They also ask for academic information, work experience, history with the party, and socioeconomic data.

Whoever fills out the form must also provide the same information about their spouses, children and siblings, including whether or not they are in the country.

For Enrique, Marcela and Raul, all this indicates that the party "wants to control and know everything about every worker" and their close family circles."They distrust all of us, but on top of that, monitoring our children or siblings is a way to intimidate us, to tell us that tomorrow they could be taken prisoner. It's a way to measure our loyalty to the government, by checking on what our family members say or do," Enrique denounces.

This article was publishedin Spanish in Confidencialandtranslated by our staff.To get the most relevant news from our English coverage delivered straight to your inbox,subscribe to The Dispatch.

View original post here:
Public Employees: "They Control Everything We Say on Social Media" - Confidencial

The Vicious Cycle of Rumor in China – China Media Project

In its latest action to rein in errant behavior on social media platforms in China, the countrys top internet control body announced this week that it had shut down 1,660 online accounts, alleging they had either disturbed social order or fabricated public policies.

Posting a statement to its website on Wednesday, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) paired news of the crackdown with eight typical cases from platforms including Weibo, the popular microblogging site, and the short-video sharing platform Kuaishou, to illustrate the nature of the violations.

As is typical of regulatory language on information in China, the notice couched the actions in metaphors of health and safety, urging the need toprevent the spread of fake information to purify the online environment. But a closer look at the cases cited by the CAC suggests a real public interest in issues such as safety, food security, regulatory overreach, and the rights of gig economy workers and an appetite for related information that is not mediated and controlled by the Party-state.

Are the public opinion controls of the CCP fighting rumors, or feeding them?

In fact, unverified information is often shared through social media channels in China precisely because controls on information are stringent, and citizens have little faith that CCP-controlled mainstream media will factually report breaking stories that are clearly in the public interest.

In one of the more outstanding cases earlier this year, social media attention to a fire at Beijings Changfeng Hospital, including eyewitness video accounts, was obliterated online, so that no news about the incident was available for more than eight hours even though the fire had occurred in a populous urban area. Only after an official news bulletin was released by the Beijing Daily, a newspaper under the control of the citys CCP committee, did media reporters begin a trickle of related reports.

In the aftermath of the Changfeng Hospital fire, there was talk of the need to prevent rumors, and the obligation of the public to speak correctly (). But the context was the need to create a positive energy public opinion climate () a Xi Jinping-era reference that placed the political prerogatives of the CCP ahead of real questions of fact.

In cases like the Changfeng Hospital fire, the robust information controls exercised by the CCP to guide public opinion and maintain social and political control, which are routinely conflated with rumor-busting, have inflated the value of rumors (as unverified but potentially true information) in the public imagination.

In the official discourse, including the official academic discourse, the Party-state is quite open about the fact that online rumors are rumors simply because they have not been issued by an authoritative government agency, or by CCP-led media.

The August 2020 edition of the official magazine Television Industry Outlook (), published by the local broadcast authority in Shaanxi province, warned against the threat that public opinion guidance (i.e., media control) might be hijacked in the internet era by online rumors emerging from the public (), rather than from the Party. When online rumor [is capable of] channeling online public opinion, and this becomes a situation where the public is responsible for [the process of] channeling, read an article by Li Shiyu (), a professor at Xinyang Normal University in Henan, the internet will cloak and mask the people, and this unusual mechanism will inevitably mean that users of the internet will lose their fetters.

In this passage, online rumor is equal to unbridled online speech. The crux is not whether information online is factual, but whether or not it agrees with the CCPs public opinion control objectives. Even if an online rumor is substantially true, and could be verified by professional news reporting, it is politically false because its existence poses a threat to the Partys construction of a harmonious, incident-free cyberspace in which, mind you, internet users should be fettered, according to Li.

The second of the eight cases cited in this weeks notice from the CAC, and highlighted in a report by the English-language China Daily, sends worrying signals not just about the risks for citizens in speaking out online in China, but also about the central leaderships apparent over-reliance on local authorities when it comes to information verification.

The case concerns rumors that students have gone missing from a school in Lanzhou (). The rumor apparently spread on the internet this week, but the notice states that police in Lanzhou found, upon investigation, that the information shared online was a rumor. In response, the police detained a man and woman, aged 18 and 19 respectively (and both surnamed Zhang) and placed them under administrative detention.

[This] unusual mechanism will inevitably mean that users of the internet lose their fetters.

Administrative detention () is a measure police are authorized to take in China for non-criminal offenses under the Public Security Administration Law. The action, which is frequently used to punish unspecified political offenses against those such as rights defenders who are seen as a threat to public order, affords the police broad administrative powers, and can mean individuals are detained for extended periods without formal arrest.

What exactly did the Zhangs say, and why? Is it not possible that they are young parents or relatives responding, more out of real concern than malice, to chatter about an incident at a local school in Lanzhou?

Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing. True or false, the goal of the authorities in Lanzhou would certainly have been to shut down speculation online and ensure that any incident was handled quietly, keeping local agitation to a minimum. In such cases, local and national media might step in to provide credible reporting, replacing speculation with facts. But in the Xi era more so than at any time in the past four decades the local authorities now dominate this process. News media have been defanged across the country in favor of a national infrastructure of official public accounts () whose pronouncements are often taken at face value as authoritative.

Reporting on the case yesterday, Shanghais The Paper, a popular official online news outlet, deferred entirely to the WeChat public account of authorities in the Lanzhou New Area (), a state-level development under the direct control of the municipal government. The same was true of all government news portals (many simply amplifying the report from The Paper) and other official state media. In the rare cases where media added anything to the Lanzhou New Area account, as in the case of the once-respected Beijing News (), the only embellishment was to add a note of condemnation from the CAC.

The recipe here for public mistrust and therefore, the exaggerated appetite for alternative information sources is simple. Citizens in the PRC, as has been noted in other authoritarian regimes, have a well-documented mistrust of local authorities (those they deal with more intimately) as opposed to a relatively high level of trust in the central authorities. And yet, as the production of authoritative information has increasingly devolved to local leaders, and more independent reporting by the media has been supplanted by the demand for Party loyalty, Chinese are still being asked simply to trust.

The purified online environment of the CCP-led information system has assured beyond any doubt that rumors will fly.

View original post here:
The Vicious Cycle of Rumor in China - China Media Project

Godrej announces launch of advanced pest control in India – FoodBev.com

Godrej Agrovet, one of Indias largest diversified agri-businesses, has announced the launch of an advanced pest control product Rashinban in India.

Godrej is working in collaboration with Nissan Chemical, which discovered and developed the chemicals used in Rashinban, and is seeing the first global launch in India to protect chilli crops during the flowering stage.

India accounts for almost 36% of total chilli production globally. However, 80% of the crops get damaged during the flowering stages because of pests such as hoppers and mites.

Rajavelu NK, CEO, crop protection business, Godrej, highlighted Rashinbans efficacy in controlling different pests. He said: Effective on the broader spectrum of pests, both sucking as well as chewing type, it eliminates the need for multiple insecticides and reduces the frequency of sprays. Hence, if used at the flowering stage, it will not only protect key economical part of the chilli farmer but also assure better yield at later stages.

On the collaboration with Godrej, Rajkumar Yadav, managing director of Nissan Chemical Corporation (India), said: We are delighted to collaborate with Godrej for the global-first launch of Rashinban and contribute to the companys endeavour to uplift Indian farming families. Rashinban is another result of our efforts to support the growth and sustainability of Indian agriculture.

With Indias spice industry poised for continued growth, the launch of Rashinban is a step toward securing Indian chilli farmers jobs and preserving Indias position as a global spice leader.

Go here to read the rest:
Godrej announces launch of advanced pest control in India - FoodBev.com