Mediaboss Marketing

Role of media in crime prevention and social awareness: Keeping society together, keeping it strong

All around the world, media has continued to play a creative role in keeping the society strong. Apart from bringing fresh news from several sources, it is also seen as a guardian of peace and order. Medias role is not limited to just that but it is also recognised for its creative input into the making of a civil society.

Crime has tormented the civil society for centuries. Medias arrival in this regard can be seen as a blow to criminal organisations and syndicates. Often media has been successful at reaching the corners where police and other crime control institutions have failed to. There are thousands of such cases which were discovered and solved because of medias efforts and contribution.

Media is also credited for serving an important role in the collective war against terrorism and other evils known as the biggest plagues for the civil society.

Bringing up cases of corruption before publics eyes and covering cases requiring publics attention and being with the society in the times of crisis, media is known for its impartial contribution to peacekeeping and maintaining order across nations. Several times media has been able to successfully bring the deficiencies of the public agencies to light and raise the level of social awareness.

Social awareness has been recognised to be the best weapon to fight against crime and this cannot be achieved alone by the government agencies. Apart from the news media, the contribution of social media must be also recognised in this area. However, while the news media has often been criticised for churning dissatisfaction against the government agencies, still its role at fighting corruption and crime has been strongly felt by the society.

In the Asian countries where media has limited freedom compared to the Western and the developed nations, despite its limitations, media has played a very strong role as a vigilante. In these nations, the level of political and bureaucratic corruption has been very high. Media has played the role of a social representative in combating this kind of corruption. In the recent years while anti corruption struggle has kept growing stronger in China, India and Hongkong and produced mixed results in these regions, the role of media in helping people fight the war was appreciable.

Even in the U.S., media has kept rising in importance not only for criticising governments wrong economic or political moves but for helping it build a progressive and globalised society. Even the media houses are subject to several kinds of pressures. In the U.S., the government and law have subjected them to limitations which stop them from playing as openly as they can. This is done for the fear that medias influence can torment civil unrest. If media agencies were not there, the situation of immigrants and the coloured population in the U.S. might have been worse.

Not just this, in several cases where publics reaction has been unable to bring out quick outcomes, publics efforts were bolstered with the help of media. Whether it is the murder of a citizen of colour or cases of domestic violence, media has always brought the most pressing issues to everyones notice.

In this regard, it has also helped citizens by spreading awareness so people can remain ready for changes in the political and economic environment of their nations. Especially in the times of crisis, medias role grows more highlighted. Whether it is during a war or in times of economic or biological crisis, media has helped people by making them aware of sources from which they can find help and support.

In such times, you often see media working in tandem with government agencies to help people and create solutions that will empower the entire society. In several corners of the world where criminals and terrorist organisations or dictators rule, there is no other hope for people than media and other sources of information like news blogs. Media does not just inspire hope in these regions, but also helps build consensus over political and economic issues.

In the backward nations however, media can play an even stronger role in helping the citizenry bring their nation and society out of the dark. In the backward nations, the government and civil machinery can be very weak. People are easily exploited and fall prey to evils like drug and crime syndicates and trafficking gangs. Innocent people often find it difficult to get help from the government agencies and medias role has mostly been instrumental at creating pressure on government agencies for swift action. Whether it is genocide, war, terrorism or other types of crisis and even exploitation of the immigrants, media has been able to fill the gaps through its efforts and create harmony through social awareness.

Thinking

It is also among institutions with the highest influence on the society and people because of its knowledge of crime and deviance. Most of peoples knowledge of crime and crime patterns is derived from the media. While sometimes, it can give rise to unnecessary fears, it has also been able to warn the society and help people take preventive actions that could create a secure environment. Not just this, media has also played a role in highlighting peoples contribution to the preservation of law and order. The overall picture of crime and justice that the common citizen has in mind is mostly influenced by media.

From sexual assault to murder, burglary and even domestic violence, a common citizen often tries to see a solution in media. In the developed nations, the relationship between police and media has been seen as symbiotic where they together defend social order and peace.

Media consumption has often been related with increased fear of crime but on the other hand media has also been able to bring focus on crime and its havens using its investigative techniques and strategy. If we check the overall image of media in this regard then it is seen world over as a vigilante that through various ways helps the society defend itself against crime and several other social ills.

In the recent times, medias image has weakened in several regions where it has been found less than effective and it is true mostly about the Asia and Middle East or the smaller underdeveloped nations. Its credit goes to several factors like the rising competition in the media sphere, rise of the social media and its misuse, political support for select media agencies and more factors. This has also led to a decline in medias credibility and popularity as people have started turning towards better sources for credible information.

Despite this fact, media remains a source of credible information for people around the world on many issues including crime, politics and economy. Media is still seen as more responsible than several other social institutions. As more options for information dissemination have emerged, people are now also relying on other sources to understand political, economic and social dynamics and how their society is evolving. Medias role may have become limited compared to a decade ago but its participation in crime control and social awareness continues.

Sources:

https://www.albany.edu/scj/jcjpc/vol10is2/dowler.html

Go here to read the rest:
Role of media in crime control and social awareness - notesmatic

Navel-gazing journalists in establishment media think they are all that stands between democracy and dictatorship. As a result of this self-aggrandizing attitude, they think they must be the final arbiters of what the peasants are allowed to know.

That is the gist of Margaret Sullivans final column in the Washington Post. Sullivan, who is retiring her column and leaving the Post, signed off by giving advice to journalists on covering threats to democracy. After droning on about how great it is that reporters recognize the threat of former President Donald Trump, Sullivan makes her grand proposal: The media should tell people what to think.

Not that that's too surprising, but it's nice to hear them say it out loud.

According to Sullivan, it is better to wait until speeches, rallies, and debates have occurred and then present them packaged with plenty of truthful reporting around them. Voters are too stupid to make decisions for themselves based on what they hear at live campaign events, if Sullivan is to be believed. The media must hold the public's hand and tell them who the good guys are and who the bad guys are.

The Washington Posts equally self-important mantra, Democracy dies in darkness, is outdated. According to Sullivan, democracy can thrive only if establishment media keep voters in the darkness.

This will not work, of course. First of all, there are too many other ways for you to get information. Second, public trust in media is in the toilet, which is probably right where it belongs.

A Gallup poll from June found that only 16% of respondents have trust in newspapers (including Sullivans Washington Post), and 11% trust the television news a record low. Sullivan claims that journalists certainly shouldnt shill for Democrats in 2024, but that claim comes laughably late. Everyone sees how biased outlets like the Post have been for decades and how much worse it has gotten recently. The last thing people want to hear is how those outlets must protect them from live events and offer voters even more of their spin you know, for the sake of "our democracy.

Sullivans reality-based press isnt going to save anyone from anything. At this point, the only people who trust establishment media are the people who work in establishment media and not even all of them. Ordinary people see this for precisely what it is: liberal partisans preening about democracy as an excuse to promote Democrats and oppose Republicans on everything.

Sullivans advice will solve nothing, but perhaps her example can. If reporters with the same worldview as Margaret Sullivan want to restore media trust and truly protect democracy, they can help start that process by retiring now.

The rest is here:
Establishment media mourn their loss of control over the information you receive - Washington Examiner

Its no secret that Twitter can be a cruel and unforgiving platform for those that tweet the wrong thing - whatever that may be. Some use this to advantage, with many media personalities and politicians now posting divisive comments as a means to boost their own presence, and remain top of mind. But for others, the tweet backlash can get overwhelming fast, which is why Twitter has been working to provide more ways for users to control their in-app experience, and limit negative interactions where possible.

And it could be close to releasing another new element on this front.

As you can see in this example, posted by app researcher Jane Manchun Wong, Twitters currently developing a new Reply filter option, which would enable users to reduce their exposure to tweets that include potentially harmful or offensive language as identified by Twitters detection systems.

As noted in the description, the filter would only stop you from seeing those replies, so others would still be able to view all responses to your tweets. But it could be another way to avoid unwanted attention in the app, which may make it a more enjoyable experience for those whove simply had enough of random accounts pushing junk responses their way.

The system would presumably utilize the same detection algorithms as Twitters offensive reply warnings, which it re-launched in February last year, after shelving the project during the 2020 US Election.

Twitter says that these prompts have proven effective, with users opting to change or delete their replies in 30% of cases where these alerts were shown.

That suggests that many Twitter users dont intentionally seek to offend or upset others with their responses, with even a simple pop-up like this having a potentially significant effect on platform discourse, and improving engagement via tweet.

Of course, that also means that 70% of people didnt agree with Twitters automated assessment of their comments, and/or are not concerned about offending people. Which rings true as noted, Twitter can still be a pretty unrelenting platform for those in the spotlight (actor Tom Holland recently announced that hes taking a break from the app due to it being very detrimental to my mental state). But still, a 30% reduction in potential tweet toxicity is significant, and this new option, which would likely utilize the same identifiers and algorithms, could add to that in another way.

As such, its, at the least, a worthy experiment from Twitter, providing even more ways for users to control their in-app experience.

Theres no word on an official release as yet, but based on the latest examples posted by Wong, it looks as though could be coming soon.

See the original post:
Twitter's Developing a New 'Reply Filter' Option to Give Users More Control Over Their Tweet Experience - Social Media Today

Asmongold is one of Twitchs most popular content creators and is known for giving his thoughts on nearly everything that is brought to his attention while streaming, from upcoming video games to real-world politics. And during a broadcast on his alternate Twitch account yesterday, the star shared his thoughts on Andrew Tates recent Facebook and Instagram bans.

Andrew Tate has skyrocketed in popularity over the last month, thanks partly to his appearance on Adin Rosss Twitch stream on July 11, which caused the 35-year-old to gain massive traction in the livestreaming space.

Many content creators on Twitch and YouTube have since condemned Tate for his stances on most topics, calling them misogynistic. And it seems Meta agrees: the media giant banned the Hustlers University creator from its platforms on Aug. 19.

Despite most being happy to see the controversial celebrity gone, Asmongold thinks the bans are a step in the wrong direction for freedom of speech.

I do think that as the main, big social media websites have just solidified their control over social media and just in general public discourse, I do think that there should be some regulation, Asmongold said. They should not just be able to automatically remove somebody from the platform because they dont like them.

Asmongold outlined his main stance on Tates Facebook and Instagram bans: he believes only those who break the law should be removed from social media platforms.

I think also its a matter of accountability. Do you want a company that has private interests removing people from a platform that might have political ideologies that could, basically like make that company less money? No, I dont think that you would, Asmongold continued.

I think that de-platforming should be limited to people who break the law.

So far there has been no official statement regarding a potential return of Tates accounts from Meta. Aside from being banned from Facebook and Instagram, the former kickboxer has a Twitch account and multiple YouTube channels still active.

Originally posted here:
'Solidifying their control': Asmongold weighs in on Andrew Tate getting banned from social media sites - Dot Esports

2022 Honeywell Industrial Cybersecurity USB Threat Report finds industrial control systems are increasingly in the sights of cyber attackers

ATLANTA, Aug. 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ --According to a report released today by Honeywell (NASDAQ: HON), the threat of USB-borne malware continues to be a serious concern. Data from the 2022 Honeywell Industrial Cybersecurity USB Threat Report indicates that 52% of threats were specifically designed to utilize removable media, up from 32% the previous year and more than double the 19% reported in the 2020 study, clearly indicating that the threats designed to use removable media have reached a dangerously high level.

Now in its fourth year, the Honeywell Industrial Cybersecurity USB Threat Report shows a clear trend: cybersecurity threats continue to be more prominent and more potent. According to the report, threats designed to establish remote access capabilities remained steady at 51%, while the number of threats designed specifically to target industrial control systems increased slightly year over year, up from 30% to 32%. At the same time, the malware was more capable of causing a disruption to industrial control systems, climbing to 81% compared to 79% the previous year.

The current report was based on aggregated cybersecurity threat data from hundreds of industrial facilities globally during a 12-month period. Along with USB attacks, the research highlights that Trojans remain a top concern because of their potential to cause severe disruption to industrial infrastructure, comprising 76% of the malware detected.

"This year's report indicates that adversaries are deliberately leveraging removable media as an initial attack vector to establish remote connectivity, exfiltrate data, and establish command and control," said Jeff Zindel, vice president and general manager, Honeywell Connected Enterprise Cybersecurity. "It's now painfully clear that USB removable media are being used to penetrate industrial/OT environments, and that organizations must adopt formal programs to defend against this type of threat to avoid costly disruptions."

For the fourth year in a row, the threats attempting to enter industrial/OT environments have continued to increase in sophistication and frequency with USB-borne malware clearly being leveraged as part of larger cyberattack campaigns. Hackers are taking advantage of USB removable media to circumvent network defenses and bypass the air gaps upon which many of these facilities depend upon for protection. Continued diligence is necessary to defend against the growing USB threat and strong USB security controls are highly recommended.

Honeywell's Secure Media Exchange (SMX) is designed to provide advanced threat detection for critical infrastructure by monitoring, better protecting and logging use of removable media throughout industrial facilities. The Honeywell Forge Cybersecurity Suite is designed to monitor for vulnerabilities such as open ports and the presence of USB security controls to strengthen endpoint and network security, while also providing better cybersecurity compliance.

Read the full report here and visit http://www.becybersecure.comfor more information on Honeywell products and services that can help improve cybersecurity.

About Honeywell:

Honeywell (www.honeywell.com) is a Fortune 100 technology company that delivers industry-specific solutions that include aerospace products and services; control technologies for buildings and industry; and performance materials globally. Our technologies help aircraft, buildings, manufacturing plants, supply chains, and workers become more connected to make our world smarter, safer, and more sustainable.For more news and information on Honeywell, please visit http://www.honeywell.com/newsroom.

Media Kevin Rainey (602) 245-7319 [emailprotected]

SOURCE Honeywell

Originally posted here:
HONEYWELL CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH REVEALS 52% OF CYBER THREATS TARGETED AT REMOVABLE MEDIA - PR Newswire