Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

Senators Markey and Cassidy Praise President Biden’s Call in the State of Union for Strengthening Children’s Online Privacy Protections – Ed Markey

Senators have introduced bipartisan legislation to ban targeted advertising and include teenagers in online privacy regulations

Washington (March 3, 2022) Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) today expressed their support for President Joe Bidens commitment to holding Big Tech accountable for childrens online privacy, and mental health, and well-being after he used his State of the Union address to call for action to strengthen childrens online privacy laws. President Biden specifically called for a ban on targeted advertising to children and an end to personal data collection on children by online and social media companies. Senators Markey and Cassidy introduced the bipartisanChildren and Teens Online Privacy Protection Actin May 2021 and pledge in their letter today to working with the Biden administration to advance this legislation.

There is a direct link between the lack of online privacy protections for young people and the youth mental health crisis in this country,write the senators in their letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.In the absence of data privacy protections for children and teens, online platforms are able to amass troves of personal information about users and leverage that data with algorithms that amplify and recommend toxic content to young and vulnerable users to keep them glued to their screens.It is imperative that the United States addresses this issue by providing children and teens with control over their data and by prohibiting companies from engaging in harmful data collection and use.

A copy of the senators letter can be foundHERE.

More than90percentof parentsagree that existing childrens privacy rules should be extended to teenagers, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, young peoples use of the internetdoubledby some estimates. Over one in four teens report using social media almost constantly. And35 percentof parents report that their children began using social media at a younger age than they had originally planned. In 2021, Surgeon General Murthy released a report on the disturbing decline in childrens mental health, noting that social media platforms must do more to stop this devastating trend.

The Senators introduced theChildren and Teens Online Privacy Protection Actto help protect American children from harm. It prohibits internet companies from collecting personal information from anyone 13- to 15-years old without the users consent; creates an online Eraser Button to permit users to eliminate personal information from a child or teen; amends theChildrens Online Privacy Protection Actto stop online platforms from turning a blind eye to the children on their websites; limits the collection of personal information from young users; and creates a Youth Privacy and Marketing Division at the Federal Trade Commission.

###

See the original post here:
Senators Markey and Cassidy Praise President Biden's Call in the State of Union for Strengthening Children's Online Privacy Protections - Ed Markey

Below average runoff continues for the upper Missouri River Basin – nwd.usace.army.mil

OMAHA, Neb. --

The updated 2022 calendar year runoff forecast for the Missouri River Basin above Sioux City, Iowa, continues to be below average.

The runoff in February was less than predicted, and we expect the lower-than-average runoff to continue in the coming months, said John Remus, chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Missouri River Basin Water Management Division.

The snow accumulation in both the plains and the mountains continues to be below average, and the soil moisture remains very low compared to normal. This resulted in us lowering our anticipated runoff for the 2022 water year, he added.

The 2022 calendar year runoff forecast above Sioux City, Iowa, has dropped from 21.7 million acre feet last month to 20.4 MAF on March 1, a reduction of 1.3 MAF. If realized, this forecast would be 79% of normal.

Runoff forecasts incorporate several factors including end-of-February soil moisture conditions, plains snowpack, mountain snowpack, and long-term precipitation and temperature outlooks. Based on these factors, runoff is expected to be well below normal for all reaches except from Gavins Point Dam to Sioux City.

February runoff in the Missouri River Basin above Sioux City was 0.9 million acre-feet, 78% of average. Runoff was below-average due to lack of snow accumulation coupled with the drier-than-normal soil conditions in the upper Basin. Drought conditions are about the same as they were at the beginning of February, with 89% of the Basin experiencing abnormally dry or drought conditions.

System storage is currently 48.1 MAF, 8.0 MAF below the base of the annual flood control zone. The System will continue to serve all Congressionally authorized purposes during 2022, including flood control, navigation, and water supply.

Basin and river conditions continue to be monitored, including plains and mountain snow accumulation, and System regulation will be adjusted based on the most up-to-date information.

Navigation:

Beginning in mid-March, releases from Gavins Point Dam will be adjusted to provide flow support for Missouri River navigation. Navigation flow support for the Missouri River is expected to be at minimum levels for the first half of the 2022 season, which begins April 1 at the mouth of the river near St. Louis, Missouri. The actual service level will be based on the total volume of water stored within the System on March 15, in accordance with the guidelines in the Master Manual. Flow support for the second half of the navigation season, as well as navigation season length, will be based on the storage in the system on July 1.

Mountain and Plains Snowpack:

Mountain snowpack in the upper Missouri River Basin is accumulating at below-average rates. The Feb. 27, mountain snowpack in the Fort Peck reach was 80% of average, while the mountain snowpack in the Fort Peck to Garrison reach was 82% of average. By March 1, about 80% of the total mountain snowpack has typically accumulated. Mountain snowpack normally peaks near April 15. The mountain snowpack graphics can be viewed at: https://go.usa.gov/xt7UH. Currently, plains snowpack in the upper Missouri River Basin is very light to non-existent.

Monthly Water Management Conference Calls for 2022:

The March 2022 monthly conference call will be held Thursday, March 3, to inform basin stakeholders of current weather and runoff forecasts and the planned operation of the reservoir system in the coming months. Presentation materials will be available via webinar. The call is intended for Congressional delegations; Tribes; state, county, and local government officials; and the media. It will be recorded in its entirety and made available to the public on the Defense Video and Imagery Distribution System at https://go.usa.gov/xt7Uz.

Spring Public Meetings:

The spring public meetings will be held the week of April 11. The purpose of these meetings is to update the region on current hydrologic conditions and the planned operation of the mainstem reservoir system during the coming months. More information will be provided when it is available.

Reservoir Forecasts:

The forecast reservoir releases and elevations discussed above are not definitive. Additional precipitation, lack of precipitation or other circumstances could cause adjustments to the reservoir release rates.

Hydropower:

The six mainstem power plants generated 448 million kWh of electricity in February. Typical energy generation for February is 624 million kWh. The power plants are expected to generate 7.4 billion kWh this year, compared to the long-term average of 9.4 billion kWh.

To view the detailed three-week release forecast for the mainstem dams, go to https://go.usa.gov/xt7PC.

The Missouri Basin Web App provides links to these reports and others that are updated more frequently. https://go.usa.gov/xt7Pb.

MISSOURI RIVER MAINSTEM RESERVOIR DATA

Pool Elevation (feet above mean sea level)

Water in Storage (1,000 acre-feet)

On February 28

Change in February

On February 28

% of 1967-2021 Average

Change in February

Fort Peck

2222.5

-1.2

12,522

86

-220

Garrison

1827.8

-0.2

14,923

84

-25

Oahe

1597.1

-0.2

15,671

88

+64

Big Bend

1420.9

-0.1

1,684

99

-6

Fort Randall

1349.7

+4.1

2,976

89

+293

Gavins Point

1204.8

-2.7

302

77

-60

Total

48,078

87

+46

WATER RELEASES AND ENERGY GENERATION FOR FEBRUARY

Average Release in 1,000 cfs

Releases in 1,000 acre-feet

Generation in Million kWh

Fort Peck

9.1

503

80

Garrison

15.6

864

123

Oahe

14.1

780

109

Big Bend

14.2

787

45

Fort Randall

9.7

536

See the rest here:
Below average runoff continues for the upper Missouri River Basin - nwd.usace.army.mil

DO’s and DON’Ts for Discussing Face Masks and COVID-19 Vaccinations with Patients – Michigan State Medical Society

Should I be wearing a face mask?

Should I get a COVID-19 vaccine booster?

These are just two of the many questions and concerns physicians and other health care providers frequently encounter when discussing face masks and COVID-19 vaccines with patients. The following guidance is intended to provide some suggested practices for physicians when engaging patients in these discussions.

DO encourage patients in areas with high COVID-19 Community Levels to mask up.

According to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, all individuals 2 years and older, regardless of vaccination status, living in areas with high COVID-19 Community Levels should be masking in public. The CDC also recommends in areas with medium COVID-19 Community Levels, individuals at high risk for severe illness and immunocompromised should speak with their physician about taking additional precautions in public, such as mask wearing.

The CDCs COVID-19 Community Level recommendations do not apply in health care settings. Health care setting should continue to monitor community transmission rates and follow CDCs infection prevention and control recommendations for health care settings. Currently, most areas across the country and nearly all of Michigan are presently considered to have substantial or high transmission of COVID-19.

DO encourage patients to get vaccinated.

Based on CDC and FDA guidelines, patients should be encouraged to receive the COVID-19 vaccine to help build protection from the virus. Physicians should counsel patients, who are not candidates for the vaccination due to medical conditions, on risk mitigation strategies, such as wearing face masks indoors, social distancing and hand washing.

DO encourage eligible patients to receive COVID-19 boosters.

When recommending booster doses for patients, reassure patients that the vaccines are effective, but research has shown a slight decrease in protection over time. Remind patients that booster shots are normal for vaccines, such as the annual flu shot or Tdap booster every 10 years. COVID-19 boosters offer elevated protections and have worked well against most variants. Pursuant to the latest CDC guidance from February 2, 2022, the following individuals are currently eligible for a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine:

For further recommendations regarding to COVID-19 vaccine eligibility, special clinical considerations, and alerts, visit the

Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines Currently Approved or Authorized in the United States webpage.

DO use effective communication that is tailored to the patient.

Physicians are a trusted source of information for patients and you should share accurate, clear, and easy-to-find information that addresses common questions. In encouraging patients to getvaccinated against COVID-19 it is important to listen to patients concerns. Professional answers to patient questions and concerns matter and can help them make an informed decision about receiving the vaccine.

Physicians should consider using words which will better resonate with each patient. For example, when discussing the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, explain the safety of the vaccine and the benefits to the patient and his or her family. Physicians should also be transparent with patients, such as discussing potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine or the effectiveness of cloth vs other types of face masks in preventing the transmission of COVID-19 indoors or in crowded places.

Physicians should avoid using judgmental language against individuals with face mask or vaccine concerns, which could negatively impact the patients trust and the overall physician-patient relationship. In addition, sharing facts about face masks and the COVID-19 vaccine, as opposed to personal opinions, may be more effective.

DO continue to implement COVID-19 policies and other infection prevention measures recommended by the CDC and MDHHS.

The CDC continues to recommend that medical practices and facilities use additional infection prevention and control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, including, but not limited to, telehealth visits where medically appropriate, screening patients and visitors entering the facility for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, and implementing source control measures, such as face masks.

If a patient or visitor objects to or refuses to comply with the practices COVID-19 policies, such as refusing to wear a face mask, physicians should ensure its policies include a protocol for explaining the CDCs guidelines for health professionals, which may be different from mandates or guidelines for individuals, and that a patient must comply with the policies while inside the facility. If necessary and appropriate, the patients appointment may be rescheduled to a telehealth visit, or the patient may be referred to another physician for treatment.

DONT routinely terminate patients who refuse to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

It has been reported in the media that some physicians are refusing to treat unvaccinated patients. In other instances, some physicians have declined to treat children based on the parents vaccination status, although the American Pediatric Association advises against refusing to treat pediatric patients based on parental vaccination status or position. Generally, a physician is legally free to determine whom to treat and to end the physician/patient relationship with appropriate advance notice. Until consensus develops on any potential ethical, licensing or liability risk exposures that physicians could face by routinely declining to treat individuals who are unvaccinated or due to the vaccination status of others, physicians should consider making treatment decisions based on the facts and circumstances of each situation.

DO implement a process for handling patient claims of medical exemptions from the practices COVID-19 policies applicable to patients.

Medical practices are generally considered places of public accommodation and must comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act as well as Michigans Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act, when enforcing the practices own COVID-19 policies. Physicians need to have a process to address requests by patients and visitors for exemptions from the practices face mask mandate or similar policies based on medical grounds and to assess whether or not reasonable accommodations are possible. Physicians should not assume that an unmasked patient or visitor cannot medically tolerate a face mask or comply with other COVID-19 policies, but physicians are permitted to accept the patient or visitors verbal representation to that effect. Best practices advise to not request medical documentation from the patient or visitor to determine whether the patient or visitor has a disability warranting a reasonable accommodation.

DONT provide face mask or vaccine exemption letters or documentation to patients which are not medically necessary.

Several media sources have reported on several physicians who have been disciplined by various state medical boards for issuing medical exemptions to patients without an objective medical basis for the exemption. Some physicians individually oppose policies which mandate face masks or COVID-19 vaccinations. Other physicians may empathize with patients who may be negatively impacted by their refusal to comply with mandatory COVID-19 policies, such as a patient who may face termination from employment unless the patient receives the COVID-19 vaccine. Regardless, physicians should not attempt to help patients circumvent COVID-19 policies applicable to patients by drafting letters or other documentation regarding the patients medical condition that is false or misleading.

Read the original:
DO's and DON'Ts for Discussing Face Masks and COVID-19 Vaccinations with Patients - Michigan State Medical Society

Wolf Administration Kicks off Problem Gambling Awareness Month to Highlight Resources and Help – Pennsylvania Pressroom

WATCH ONLINE

Harrisburg, PA - Today, Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs (DDAP) Secretary Jen Smith was joined by the Pennsylvania Lottery, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB), the Council on Compulsive Gambling of Pennsylvania, problem gambling treatment provider Empowerment Resources Associates, and an individual in long-term recovery from problem gambling to kick off March as National Problem Gambling Awareness Month.

This year marks the 18th anniversary of National Problem Gambling Awareness Month. The National Council of Problem Gamblings reoccurring theme, Awareness + Action, is designed to increase public awareness of the availability of treatment and recovery services and encourage health care providers to screen clients for problem gambling.

I encourage all Pennsylvania residents to learn about the signs of problem gambling and help spread the message that treatment and resources are available, and recovery is possible, said Secretary Smith. By educating one another on these signs, you may be able to help a loved one or a friend get the help they need before their gambling turns into a more serious problem and negatively impacts their health or wellbeing.

In conjunction with Penn State University, DDAP and PGCB recently released the first-of-its-kind report analyzing the impact of Interactive Gaming, also referred to as online gambling or iGaming in Pennsylvania. The findings of this report were generated from a survey of more than 1,100 individuals across Pennsylvania throughout 2020-21 and indicate:

Gambling, even through legal avenues, becomes a problem when individuals begin to develop strained relationships with loved ones, borrow money to gamble, gamble to experience a high or feeling, and miss work, school, or other activities and obligations in order to gamble. These behaviors can have a serious impact on a persons financial, physical, and mental health. Other symptoms of problem gambling include trying to hide or lying about gambling, using gambling as an escape to avoid dealing with other problems, and feeling like the habit is out of control but being unable to stop.

The Pennsylvania Lottery works hard to ensure it has responsible gambling measures in place, such as offering PA Lottery online players the option to set limits, select a cool-off period, or self-exclude for one or five years, said Pennsylvania Lottery Executive Director Drew Svitko. Should a player express a gambling disorder concern, the Lottery is ready to work with its partners to connect the player with the resources available to help in the recovery process.

Pennsylvanias Self-Exclusion Program allows an individual to request to be excluded from legalized gaming activities and those within a casino and offsite venues. More information on the program and ways to identify problem gambling can be found through the PGCBs website specific to its efforts in compulsive and problem gaming.

Individuals seeking compulsive or problem gambling treatment can call Pennsylvanias helpline at 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537). This helpline is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year to connect callers with local resources in their community. A live chat option is also available online or via text message at 1-800-522-4700 for those seeking help who may not be comfortable speaking to a helpline operator.

For more information on problem gambling resources, visit ddap.pa.gov.

MEDIA CONTACT: Stephany Dugan - ra-dapressoffice@pa.gov

# # #

Original post:
Wolf Administration Kicks off Problem Gambling Awareness Month to Highlight Resources and Help - Pennsylvania Pressroom

The impact of hockey’s Russian backlash, and what’s next – ESPN

8:30 AM ET

Greg WyshynskiESPN

Andrei Svechnikov has two locations listed in his Instagram bio. One is Raleigh, North Carolina, where the Carolina Hurricanes star has played for the past four seasons. The other is Kazan, the Russian city where his family lived after stops in Moscow and Siberia.

Svechnikov is Russian, a designation that's taken on a different context over the past two weeks after Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his army to invade Ukraine. The NHL, never known for emphatic political stances, released a statement that "condemns Russia's invasion of Ukraine and urges a peaceful resolution as quickly as possible."

It also expressed concern for the well-being of players, like Svechnikov, "who play in the NHL on behalf of their NHL clubs, and not on behalf of Russia," acknowledging the players and their families "are being placed in an extremely difficult position."

For some Russian players, that's meant online harassment and public disparagement since the war began. The NHL has offered security resources to its teams, and the teams have beefed up their own security to protect these players.

Their teammates also are looking out for them, as Svechnikov's teammate Jordan Martinook explained on Tuesday.

"It's not anything that Svech can control. It's out of his hands. Obviously, you want to support him. You've seen it with other players in the league. People are getting some criticism," Martinook said. "If anybody tries to make him feel bad about the situation, then he's got 23 brothers who will stick up for him."

Dan Milstein believes the treatment of Russian players now is tantamount to discrimination. In some ways, he isn't wrong.

Milstein is Ukrainian. Proudly Ukrainian. He is a political refugee who escaped the Soviet Union on the last day of its existence and has lived in Kyiv. He has watched, from afar, as Russia invaded Ukraine. He said his heart has broken many times over. When he talks with his friends back in Ukraine, he hears bombs exploding in the background.

"I'm sick. The building that I lived in for the first 16 years of my life is under attack right at this moment," he said. "But I'm a Ukrainian, defending innocent people. I feel if I don't defend Russians, who will?"

Milstein is known in hockey circles for the substantial number of Russian players represented by his agency, Gold Star Sports Management. Among his clients are some of the most popular players on their NHL teams: Nikita Kucherov and Andrei Vasilevskiy of the Tampa Bay Lightning; Ilya Sorokin of the New York Islanders; and Ilya Mikheyev of the Toronto Maple Leafs. Milstein also represents Calgary Flames defenseman Nikita Zadorov, who posted a graphic with "no war" written on his Instagram. Milstein said it sparked a torrent of derogatory messages directed toward the defenseman.

"Most Russian people that I know, and especially hockey players, want world peace. Nobody likes the war," the agent said. "They're being discriminated against right now because they're Russian. Their lives are being threatened."

It's been staggering to see how swiftly the hockey world has responded to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

The International Ice Hockey Federation has pulled events from that nation and banned both Russia and Belarus from participating in any IIHF events. The now-canceled world junior tournament was scheduled for December 2022 and January 2023 with Russian cities Novosibirsk and Omsk, both in Siberia, as the hosts. Novosibirsk was constructing a new arena facility specifically for the event.

"The IIHF is not a political entity and cannot influence the decisions being taken over the war in Ukraine," IIHF president Luc Tardif said. "We nevertheless have a duty of care to all of our members and participants and must therefore do all we can to ensure that we are able to operate our events in a safe environment for all teams taking part in the IIHF World Championship program."

2 Related

Tardif's predecessor as IIHF president was Rene Fasel, who is known for his friendly relationship with Russian hockey. Fasel told Russian media that the IIHF's actions were "a sad moment" for the organization.

"Even during the Cold War, the Soviet Union played with the United States and with Canada. Even in such a tense situation as today, sport must carry the message of peace and united people," he said.

This is usually the kind of utopian naivety you might expect from the International Olympic Committee, which prides its events as being apolitical -- except when it comes to Russian aggression in Ukraine, apparently. While a facile Fasel is asking for campfire singalongs with Russia, the IOC executive board recommended to each member nation's governing sports bodies that they "not invite or allow the participation of Russian and Belarusian athletes and officials in international competitions."

The NHL, meanwhile, has discontinued "any consideration of Russia as a location for any future competitions," while also pausing its business relationships with a Russian sports wagering company and Yandex, one of Europe's largest internet companies that streams the league's games in Russia.

There's additional fallout in media and sponsorship. EA Sports announced that because the IIHF has suspended Russian and Belarusian teams, it will be removing those teams from "NHL 22" because "we stand with the people of Ukraine."

CCM Hockey vowed not to use any Russian players in its global marketing for the time being. That includes Alex Ovechkin, whose commercial with MassMutual -- one of the funniest NHL-adjacent ads ever, featuring him and Nicklas Backstrom eating cereal and discussing their on-ice partnership -- has been pulled from U.S. television.

No player has had his reputation tarnished by the Russian invasion more than Ovechkin. Overnight, it seemed like the conversion turned from the Wayne Gretzky record chase and potential MVP honors to his support of Vladimir Putin.

Ovechkin, 36, has been an ardent supporter of Putin over the years. In 2017, he campaigned on behalf of Putin by starting a social media movement called Putin Team, writing, "I never made a secret of my attitude toward our president, always openly supporting him." He has actively recruited other players to the cause.

He also has supported Russian military action in the past. In 2014, when Russia invaded and subsequently annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine, Ovechkin posted a photo to Instagram holding a sign that read "Save Children From Fascism," writing that "our Grandparents have seen all the horrors of fascism! We will not allow it in our time!"

It says a lot about the reaction to his association with Putin when Ovechkin -- the most marketable NHL star since Gretzky -- is persona non grata in marketing campaigns. Ovechkin didn't help himself during his news conference on Russia's invasion last week. Sure, he grabbed some headlines for his plea for peace. But he didn't mention Ukraine. Didn't mention Ukrainians. And certainly didn't condemn Russia's attack on that nation.

And Ovechkin, with sponsors running away from him, still has a photo of himself with Putin as his Instagram avatar. Some have speculated that Ovechkin is in a bind, fearing for friends and family in Russia. Others have speculated that he is simply a Putin fan -- who is in turn an Ovechkin fan -- and supports the military action.

Ovechkin critics from the beforetime have seized on this moment. The New York Post's Larry Brooks and Damien Cox of the Toronto Star have, respectively, called for his merchandise to be pulled from NHL retail stores and for him to be suspended by the league. The situation has led to journalists outside the hockey bubble criticizing him and fans doing so, as well.

Ovechkin has earned some condemnation after years of supporting a politician while simultaneously claiming the support wasn't political; it's going to be fascinating to see the reaction when the Washington Capitals hit the road next week for visits to Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver.

But what about other Russian players, the ones who weren't fronting "Putin Team"?

If you're a hockey fan and harassing a player for simply being Russian or Belarusian, please stop. You don't know what their personal considerations are in speaking or not speaking, which could range from the safety of family to their future in international hockey to potentially breaking Russian law. Rick Westhead of TSN reported on Wednesday that agents are advising their players to be careful because "Russian parliament is considering a new law that could mean up to 15 years in prison for spreading 'fake news' about the war." That is what's on the table for these players.

They don't owe you explanation or condemnation any more than an American player owed one when the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003.

Remember when Montreal Canadiens fans booed "The Star-Spangled Banner" in protest of the war? As one member of the New York Islanders, their opponents that night, put it: "I'm sure there are a lot of people against the war, but some things people can't control."

That player was Russian-born Alexei Yashin, by the way.

These current Russian players certainly don't deserve to be threatened for the actions of their country of origin. As Martinook said of Svechnikov: "I just think it's totally out of his control. When you're trying to bring politics into hockey, it's hard for guys to really have a stance on it when it's out of their control."

Russian players on all levels are getting swept up in this backlash. Milstein points to the Canadian Hockey League and the United States Hockey League, as rumors are rampant that teams in those junior-level leagues might opt not to select Russian and Belarusian athletes in their import drafts later this year.

"This isn't the national team. These are 16- and 17-year-old children that you are discriminating against. That you're denying the opportunity," he said.

If they were banned from the draft, these players likely would then sign three-year, entry-level contracts in Russia or Belarus.

"This is exactly what the Russians want," Milstein said. "They never want the kids to play in North America at such a young age. So you're basically helping them."

Milstein said that general managers from the USHL and CHL have reached out to him regarding the future of Russian and Belarusian players. He said they indicated it was unfair that public pressure could restrict them from selecting those players in their drafts but that to speak up about it would get them "put up for public execution" in the court of public opinion, given the current climate.

"We pride ourselves here in North America that we have the best league and the best players. But now you're discriminating, just because they're born in Russia," Milstein said.

He believes this will extend to the 2022 NHL draft. Gold Star, Milstein's firm, has 20 players who are projected to be taken this summer.

"The guys that are supposed to go in the middle rounds, we're concerned that they won't be selected," he said. "The guys that are supposed to go in the first round? I can't guarantee that they will anymore."

The undrafted players will then continue their junior careers.

"And at some point in time, when Russians are back in fashion, the very same teams will be chasing those guys as free agents -- and promising the golden skies to play with their North American clubs," Milstein said. "At some point in time, everyone's going to kiss and make up."

When you peel back the layers of this backlash, you can't help but feel a sense of temporariness:

The IIHF notably didn't cancel the 2023 men's world championship in Saint Petersburg, Russia. It has left its options open to do so, but there's too much money in an event held in a 23,000-seat arena to cancel it outright.

The moment the IIHF lifts its ban is the moment EA Sports flips a switch to put Russia and Belarus back in its games.

The NHL is "pausing" its Russian media site and has pulled its games from Yandex, which introduced a 24/7 channel covering the league this season. But fans can still watch games if they VPN in to another service.

CCM Hockey said it isn't using Ovechkin "at this point."

For many brands, there's a sense of necessary, immediate and proactive distancing from Russian athletes because of the global reaction to the war. How long these sanctions last or when they will be quietly lifted is anyone's guess. We've seen movements like this before from brands and sponsors, whether it's during a political moment or a national tragedy. We don't have to go back but two years to remember similar public advocacy during the Black Lives Matter protests. How emphatic that dedication to racial justice and equality was then, while brands and sponsors haven't been nearly as forthright with their efforts or stances of late.

Also murky: how long this war will be fought. No one knows how far it'll spread. As a result, no one knows what life could be like for Russian players next season, both in public perception and in ability to play.

This season will include 103 exclusive regular-season games across ESPN, ESPN+, Hulu and ABC, and more than 1,000 out-of-market games will be available on ESPN+. How to watch Subscribe to ESPN+ Stream the NHL on ESPN

Another agent I spoke with wondered if the U.S. government would revoke existing work visas for Russians in the country, which would certainly impact hockey players.

I asked Milstein if he was at all concerned about the status of his players in the NHL next season. Whether he worried they wouldn't be in the NHL at all.

"Of course, I'm concerned. But most importantly, I'm concerned about their well-being and safety. Because right now, they're being threatened," he said. "My clients of Russian heritage are good and kind people. Myself and my clients pay millions of dollars in U.S. and Canadian taxes. We are huge contributors to the North American society."

There will be anger. There will be backlash. There will be ill feelings expressed toward Russian athletes and a sense that they should shoulder a larger burden in asking for peace. Some of it is fair, such as in Alex Ovechkin's case. Much of it is not, as Russian players who share nothing with this war outside of a birthplace are harassed or professionally impacted due to that association.

What Milstein hopes is that this energy is channeled in an entirely different, more constructive place -- toward the people Russia is attacking.

"Instead of hating on each other and going to social media, donate whatever you can -- food, clothing, money -- to support the innocent people of Ukraine," he said.

See more here:
The impact of hockey's Russian backlash, and what's next - ESPN