Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

Knicks Tom Thibodeau is losing control of Julius Randle on the court – Empire Sports Media

It wasnt more than a year ago that Knicks All-Star power forward Julius Randle was averaging 24+ points per night on average. Enjoying his best season to date, Randle justified a four-year, $117 million extension, but his fall-off this season has been dramatic.

Ranging from hostile remarks toward the media to a downward pointing thumb as fans questioned his passion for the team, Randles pedestal has shrunk to a mere tree-stump.

In fact, rumors have floated that Randle could be on the trade block in the coming days as the deadline quickly approaches on February 10. However, head coach Tom Thibodeau still believes in his star forward, even if hes had a progressively more difficult time controlling his efficiency and extracting his true potential.

Whether Randles ego has consumed his selflessness or hes simply regressing to the mean, the veteran has been a shell of his former self, putting the Knicks in a progressively more difficult position.

Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau has admitted to associates hes had more trouble getting Randle to play with a selflessness this season than during last season, an NBA source toldMarc Bermanof theNew York Post.

Berman also noted that some believe Randle could be trying to justify his massive contract extension with more burdon regarding scoring production. The problem is that sometimes the best way to excrete value is simply playing a complementary role.

With RJ Barrett averaging over 20 points per game to start the new year, Randle has fallen to the No. 2 scoring option, which isnt necessarily a problem.

The issue lies more in his disdain for not being the top scorer but being the Robin to RJs Batman. The roles are reversing, and Randle seemingly cant handle the downgrade.

Randle is averaging a measly 16.4 points per game and shooting 24.2% from the 3-PT range to start the new year. Alternatively, Barrett is blossoming into the star New York needs him to be, which coincides directly with Juliuss regression, oddly.

If the two cant find a way to thrive together, the Knicks will have to make a big change, and it might involve sending Randle packing.

Follow this link:
Knicks Tom Thibodeau is losing control of Julius Randle on the court - Empire Sports Media

Opinion | Donald Trump and the Peril to Democracy – The New York Times

To the Editor:

Re Trump Sought Ways to Seize Vote Machines (front page, Feb. 1):

New accounts that show that former President Donald Trump was directly involved in plans to use security agencies, including the military, to seize control of voting machines in swing states some six weeks after Election Day confirm how perilously close the nation came to a burgeoning autocracy.

Were it not for some of Mr. Trumps trusted advisers, including the clownish, conspiracy-theory-peddling Rudy Giuliani, Americans might have witnessed armed military personnel rolling into their communities, crushing democracy along the way.

That Rudy Giuliani might have been a voice of reason during this moment is in itself a weird and chilling commentary on just how fragile our electoral system is.

Cody LyonBrooklyn

To the Editor:

Re Trump Suggests He May Pardon Jan. 6 Rioters if He Has Another Term (news article, Jan. 31):

If these radical, vicious, racist prosecutors do anything wrong or illegal, I hope we are going to have in this country the biggest protests we have ever had in Washington, D.C., in New York, in Atlanta and elsewhere because our country and our elections are corrupt. So spoke Donald Trump at a recent rally.

Mr. Trumps strategy to prevent his indictment is to threaten riots. Indeed, with many millions of cultlike true believers, his indictment surely would cause mass civil unrest and perhaps civil war, especially given that many of his most ardent supporters are well armed.

And one might well ask: Which side would the police and members or ex-members of the military be on? Many of them are ardent Trumpists. Would any prosecutor be willing to risk this?

Mr. Trumps strategy is clear, and those of us who want to rescue our country from this would-be autocrat need a clear strategy, too. And that, unfortunately, cannot include the liberal fantasy of Mr. Trump in the dock or jail. Trump and Trumpism must be defeated at the ballot box. Its the only way.

Gerald Lee VogelGermantown, Md.

To the Editor:

If Donald Trump runs for re-election as president, it would take me a ream of printer paper and 8-point type to list the reasons for not voting for him. And I am a registered Republican.

But now a new reason has arisen that takes its place at the top of the list. On Saturday, at a rally in Texas, Mr. Trump said that if he is re-elected as president, he would consider pardoning those prosecuted for what they did at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Somehow Mr. Trump feels that the people being charged with crimes are being treated unfairly.

I was at home on Jan. 6 and spent most of the day watching news coverage. It took our former president almost three hours to ask the crowd to disperse and go home, telling them, Go home, we love you, youre very special. Several of his aides, including his daughter Ivanka, as well as legislators and conservative media reporters, begged him earlier to ask the rioters to disperse and go home. That did no good.

It boggles my mind that anyone who watched even part of what happened on Jan. 6 and saw Mr. Trumps reaction to it could in any way support or vote for him. I certainly cannot. Mr. Trump may have thought the people who overtook the Capitol deserved our love and were very special. I did not.

Gerald S. TanenbaumCharleston, S.C.

To the Editor:

Re Trumps Aim: Keep Power at All Costs, by Shane Goldmacher (news analysis, front page, Feb. 2):

The prospect of Donald Trumps bid for another term as president has the media in a tizzy. The same media that allowed Mr. Trump to control the narrative during the 2016 presidential campaign may be overcompensating for its past failures by sounding the alarm bell with headlines predicting the demise of freedom as we know it. With Mr. Trumps unfitness for office well documented and his waning ability to use the media as a conduit to deceit, why such angst?

Have you forgotten how soundly Mr. Trump was defeated just 15 months ago? President Biden received the most votes ever cast for a U.S. presidential candidate and won by a margin of more than seven million votes.

The media can rest assured in the knowledge that the electorate is democracys safe harbor.

Jane LarkinTampa, Fla.

To the Editor:

Re National Debt Breaks Record at $30 Trillion (front page, Feb. 2):

Well, the national debt wouldnt be so high if big money corporations and individuals were paying its fair share of taxes.

To the Editor:

Re The Case for Writing Longhand (Inside The Times, Jan. 21):

As a retired teacher, I found that your article brought back many memories. I am from the time when the nuns converted left-handers like me into writing right-handed by some encouragement and some strapping.

Most of the first two decades of my teaching career, the 1980s and 90s, saw all of the student work handwritten and most of my notes and tests handwritten and then copied; I loved the smell of a mimeograph machine early in the morning.

The next two decades saw the increase in typing and the decrease in handwriting skills, including my own. There was a time when many people were illiterate, but now they are illegible.

Many students were surprised to know that if examiners couldnt read your answers they couldnt give them marks, and they wouldnt spend time trying to translate the scribbles into words.

Its time to bring back pen licenses that confirm that young children can write neatly enough to now use a pen, and make sure the kids deserve them.

Dennis FitzgeraldMelbourne, Australia

Visit link:
Opinion | Donald Trump and the Peril to Democracy - The New York Times

VIRGINIA BEACH HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO HOST FREE COVID-19 AND FLU VACCINATION CLINIC SATURDAY FEBRUARY 5 – Newsroom – Virginia Department of Health

February 2, 2022

Media Contact: Beth Boutot beth.boutot@vdh.virginia.gov

VIRGINIA BEACH HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO HOST FREE COVID-19 AND FLU VACCINATION CLINIC SATURDAY FEBRUARY 5

(Virginia Beach, Va.) The Virginia Beach Department of Public Health will host a FREE COVID-19 and Flu vaccination clinic Saturday, February 5 from 10 a.m. noon at Kingdom Cathedral, 3820 Stoneshore Road.

COVID-19 vaccines remain our best defense to reduce the spread and diminish serious illness and hospitalization.

All vaccines will be available including boosters. Ages 5-17 will be offered the Pfizer vaccine and will need to be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian.

Eligible individuals may choose which vaccine they receive as a booster dose. Some people may have a preference for the vaccine type that they originally received, and others may prefer to get a different booster. Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) recommendations now allow for this type of mix and match dosing for booster shots, however it is recommended you discuss mixing doses with your primary care physician.

Appointments for Saturday are encouraged; however, walk-ins will be accepted. Visit the links below to schedule your appointment time.

Saturday February 5, 10 a.m. noon

Kingdom Cathedral, 3820 Stoneshore Road

Appointments:

Pfizer Vaccine 5-11

Pfizer Vaccine 12+

Moderna Vaccine

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine

No appointment needed for the Flu vaccine.

For more information on COVID-19 vaccines, visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccines for COVID-19 page at http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/index.html.

###

NOTE: Members of the media are not permitted inside the clinic when patients are present. Members of the media may respectfully approach clinic patients outside of the clinic and talk to them if they provide consent. Media members who do not comply may be asked to leave the site. Interview requests should be sent to beth.boutot@vdh.virginia.gov at least 24 hours in advance if possible.

Read this article:
VIRGINIA BEACH HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO HOST FREE COVID-19 AND FLU VACCINATION CLINIC SATURDAY FEBRUARY 5 - Newsroom - Virginia Department of Health

Ahead of Winter Olympics, Beijing Moves to Quash Dissent – The New York Times

Chinese authorities have detained activists in their homes and sent others to jail. Censors have shut down the social media accounts of prominent critics. Officials have warned Olympians that protest could bring prosecution.

As athletes, journalists and other participants arrive for the Winter Olympics that begin on Friday, they are encountering some of the most intense security measures ever imposed at an international sporting event. Many of those are precautions against Covid-19, but others reflect the Chinese governments growing intolerance of dissent and criticism.

Hu Jia, a prominent human rights activist, said the police in Beijing were confining him to his apartment. In January, he took to Twitter to criticize state security agents for questioning, harassing and detaining critics ahead of the Winter Olympics. Since then, the police have visited him four times in eight days.

They said if I dont stay silent, my rights to visit my mother may be affected, he said, adding that the authorities were determined to quash any overt criticisms of the Games online.

With the authorities tightening their grip across Chinese society, one major question is whether any Olympic participants, including athletes, will be willing or able to speak out on issues the government deems objectionable. Activists and human rights groups have accused the party of decimating civil liberties in Hong Kong, oppressing ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet, and censoring Peng Shuai, a top tennis player who has mostly disappeared from public view after accusing a senior Chinese leader of sexual assault.

Teng Biao, a Chinese lawyer who was detained and disbarred during the Beijing Olympics in 2008, said that he believed that visiting athletes had a responsibility to say something about Chinas growing repression.

Beijing has made it clear that such conduct could be met with consequences, even as officials have trumpeted their welcome for arriving athletes.

Any behavior or speech that is against the Olympic spirit, especially against the Chinese laws and regulations, are also subject to certain punishment, Yang Shu, the deputy director of Beijings Olympic organizing committee, warned during a recent call organized by the Chinese Embassy in Washington.

The crackdown adds to an already restrictive atmosphere. The Games will take place in three bubbles guarded by workers in hazmat gear and cut off from the surrounding cities and from ordinary citizens. Those inside the bubbles must download a Chinese app that monitors their health and controls their movements between venues. Researchers say the software has encryption gaps that leave users personal information exposed.

The Olympic events will take place in front of a limited audience of screened spectators of Chinas choosing. Organizers have installed fences to keep people out of venues like Beijings iconic National Stadium, known as the Birds Nest, where the opening ceremony will be held.

The heavy-handed controls are a way to show the Chinese governance model works, said Yaqiu Wang, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch.

Under the current Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, Beijing has turned to harsh authoritarian tactics to quash dissent and build national power. To the party, the Olympics is an emblem of the Chinese political systems success, and Beijing is unafraid to clamp down on those who seek to criticize it.

Feb. 3, 2022, 12:51 a.m. ET

Olympic sponsors, advertisers and contractors have warned their employees not to raise sensitive topics, lest they jeopardize companies access to Chinas market. Some national teams have advised athletes not to bring their own phones, but to use temporary ones, because of concerns about surveillance.

What a world for us to be living in, said Mandie McKeown, executive director of the International Tibet Network, a coalition of groups supporting Tibetan rights that helped to organize protests in several cities calling for a boycott of the Olympics.

She criticized the International Olympic Committee for not doing more to press China to ensure free speech and other values written in the Olympic Charters. Its just ludicrous, she said.

The atmosphere contrasts with that of the 2008 Games, when there was hope for some easing of the Chinese Communist Partys authoritarian proclivities. Despite the widespread censorship and detentions of activists, officials then had opened much of the country to reporters and even allotted space for three protest zones though registering protests proved impossible.

Nothing like that has happened this time.

Now, Mr. Xi is showing that China has become powerful enough that it does not need to worry about what people think, according to Mr. Teng, the human rights lawyer, who went into exile and is now a visiting scholar at the University of Chicago.

Compared to 2008, the Chinese government has become more and more powerful and aggressive. It seems they care less about international pressure, he said in an interview, noting the brazenness of the warnings to foreign athletes.

They really want to pre-emptively silence the athletes, he said.

Across the country, the authorities have moved to muzzle those who might speak out while the spotlight is on China. Human rights groups have pointed to the detention or sentencing of five high-profile activists in recent weeks, including Xie Yang, a lawyer who was detained in January in the central city of Changsha for inciting subversion and picking quarrels and provoking disturbances.

Liang Xiaojun, a lawyer whose law license was revoked last month, said police officers had visited him in mid-January to warn him that China was entering its Olympic security period. Since then, he said, officials have been calling him regularly to check on his whereabouts.

Several activists and intellectuals said in interviews that the police have tried to silence them by shutting down their access to social media and the internet.

Zhang Yihe, a Chinese author and historian, said that Chinese censors on Jan. 8 banned her from using various functions on the popular social media app WeChat, in a move she believed was linked to the Olympics. Gao Yu, a veteran journalist and activist, said her WeChat account was also suspended in January. More recently, Ms. Gao said, security officials demanded she shut down her Twitter account.

The Chinese Communist Party will control peoples speech for the Olympics, she said, adding, not even the slightest criticism is allowed.

Chinese officials have already said that athletes will be given cell services that enable them to circumvent the governments expansive censorship, which blocks sites like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google. It is unclear if the authorities would seek to punish Olympic participants for online dissent, as they would Chinese citizens.

Mr. Teng said that Chinas ability to sideline criticism during such a major event signaled how powerful China had grown since 2008.

Beijing has the power the economic and political power to make the global business silent, even complicit, with human rights violations, he said.

See the article here:
Ahead of Winter Olympics, Beijing Moves to Quash Dissent - The New York Times

Variation of TNF modulates cellular immunity of gregarious and solitary locusts against fungal pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae – pnas.org

Significance

Ecological immunology addresses the interactions between host immunity and the environment. Locusts display density-dependent phase transitions between solitary and gregarious locusts. In control practices and laboratory bioassays, gregarious locusts always exhibit stronger resistance to fungal pathogens than solitary locusts. However, few studies have investigated the mechanism of altered immune switch in locusts. Here, we combined mathematical simulation and experimental studies to show that gregarious locusts inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to alter immune defense by enhancing humoral defense and reducing cellular defense, and high levels of TNF reduce the survival of solitary locusts. Our study provides an important cue for understanding cellular immunity variations in response to different population densities and for improving the control efficacy of locust plagues.

Changes in population density lead to phenotypic differentiation of solitary and gregarious locusts, which display different resistance to fungal pathogens; however, how to regulate their cellular immune strategies remains unknown. Here, our stochastic simulation of pathogen proliferation suggested that humoral defense always enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens, while phagocytosis sometimes reduced defense against pathogens. Further experimental data proved that gregarious locusts had significantly decreased phagocytosis of hemocytes compared to solitary locusts. Additionally, transcriptional analysis showed that gregarious locusts promoted immune effector expression (gnbp1 and dfp) and reduced phagocytic gene expression (eater) and the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Interestingly, higher expression of the cytokine TNF in solitary locusts simultaneously promoted eater expression and inhibited gnbp1 and dfp expression. Moreover, inhibition of TNF increased the survival of solitary locusts, and injection of TNF decreased the survival of gregarious locusts after fungal infection. Therefore, our results indicate that the alerted expression of TNF regulated the immune strategy of locusts to adapt to environmental changes.

From biblical times to 2020, the locust is the most destructive migratory pest on crops, pasture, and fodder because it is highly mobile and can form swarms containing millions of locusts in various parts of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. Population density is an important ecological factor that affects physiological processes in animal species. High population density is an important factor that facilitates collective survival in animal groups (1, 2). Locusts (Locusta migratoria) exhibit a remarkable density-dependent polyphenism, for which changes in population density are the key factors driving the transition between solitary and gregarious phases accompanied by considerable phenotypic, physiological, and gene expression variations (3, 4). Recent studies have recognized that immunity is dynamic and adapts to environmental variations and opportunities (57). A previous study showed that crowded conditions stimulate the migratory locusts to divert their molecular immune strategies against pathogens and cause density-dependent prophylactic immunity for population survival (3). Expression profiles in the fat bodies of locusts reveal that gregarious locusts enhance pattern recognition proteins to sequester pathogens and increase the Euclidean distance between infectious and healthy individuals (3). Interestingly, the cellular defenses of invertebrate animals often use phagocytosis, encapsulation, and nodulation to sequester and eliminate pathogens.

Our previous studies have demonstrated that the migratory locusts can respond to changes in population density in the global profiles of coding genes, microRNA transcription, and metabolomes, so that manipulating them can lead to significant changes in locust phenotypes (811). Gregarious locusts display significantly stronger resistance to fungal pathogens than solitary locusts do at the molecular immune level (2, 3). Although the encapsulation and total hemocyte counts did not show a significant difference between solitary and gregarious desert locusts, differential cellular defenses have been investigated by enumerating hemocytes in other insect species (12). However, recent studies have revealed an inconsistent release of sessile hemocytes into hemocoel circulation in mosquitoes during infections (13, 14). Despite the number of hemocytes, cellular defenses can modulate the systematic responses of hosts by secreting cytokines (15, 16). Importantly, altered immunity in invertebrates is modulated by various cytokines, including growth-blocking peptides (GBPs), unpaired proteins (Upds), PDGF/VEGF-receptor related protein (Pvr), and eiger/tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (1720). In particular, TNF can regulate comprehensive changes in physiology, including energy consumption (21), phagocytosis, and immune effector production (2224). However, the role of cellular defenses in density-dependent prophylactic immunity remains largely unknown.

To understand the interactions between hemocytes and microbes, stochastic simulations were applied to investigate the kinetic proliferation of microbes under various conditions. The prescription of these mathematical models is an enumeration of the possible events and how their rates depend on parameters and the current state of the system (25). Given the parameters and their values, numerical solutions were generated using the Gillespie algorithm (26, 27). Simple stochastic models of kinetic variations between cell and pathogen populations are the birthdeath process. The death rates of pathogens are dependent on immune cell phagocytosis, humoral attack, and natural death. The death of immune cells depends on the rates of phagocytosis, recovery, destruction, and natural death. By describing the variable immune defenses computationally, we can gain a deep insight into processes that are not accessible through experimental means.

In this study, we combined the mathematical model with experiments to compare the differential phagocytic abilities of gregarious and solitary locust hemocytes. We used transcriptome analysis to investigate the critical cytokines involved in regulating the altered immunity of locusts. Finally, we observed that cytokines regulate the survival of locusts after infection with the fungal pathogen, Metarhizium anisopliae. Our study found that TNF functions as a switch to alert the cellular immune strategy of solitary and gregarious locusts against infection by a fungal pathogen, providing cytological evidence for ecological immunity of density-dependent and important cues for improving the efficiency of biological control of locusts.

To understand the kinetics of the immune response during infection, we used the stochastic model (26, 27), which enumerates the possible events, to simulate the kinetics of microbial growth and hemocyte survival (Fig. 1A).

Stochastic simulation of hemocytes and pathogen growth in altered immune defenses. (A) The schematic of humoral and cellular defense in host resist pathogen infection. indicates the increase rate of hemocytes for the total events of the proliferation, migration, and death, and indicates the increase rate of microbes including the total events of the proliferation and death by humoral attack. K1, K2, and K3 indicates the rate of phagocytosis efficient, phagocytes recovery, and phagocytes death (microbe escape) respectively. (B) To observe the competence of hemocytes and microbe growth, various status of cellular defense, microbe virulence and humoral defenses were examined in simulation. All status (8 combinations) of cellular defense, humoral defense, and microbe virulence (high or low) were observed in the simulation. (C) Kinetic curves of hemocytes and microbes by immune defense of high humoral and high cellular defenses. Left indicates status 3 and Right indicates status 4. (D) Kinetic curves of hemocytes and microbes by immune defense of high humoral and low cellular defenses. Left indicates status 6 and Right indicates status 8.

At an infinitely small interval of t time, the total functional hemocytes are the sum of self-renewal, survival of hemocytes, and minus of phagocytes (assumed as one hemocyte eats one microbe), and the total of free microbes is the sum of self-renewal, survival of microbes, and minus of phagocytes. The kinetics of hemocyte and microbe proliferation are described by ordinary differential Eqs. 1 and 2:d(hemocytes)/dt=*N+(K21)K1*M*N[1]d(microbes)/dt=*M+(K31)*K1*M*N[2]

Here, indicates the increased rate of hemocytes for the total events of proliferation, migration, and death, and indicates the increased rate of microbes, including the total events of proliferation and death by humoral attack. K1, K2, and K3 indicate the rate of phagocytosis efficiency, phagocyte recovery, and phagocyte death (microbe escape), respectively (Fig. 1A). In addition, N and M indicate the initial number of hemocytes and microbes in the system, respectively. Herein, we assume that one hemocyte engulfed microbes with high efficiency from 20 to 100%, representing regular and enhanced cellular defense. By observing humoral defense, we used the low growth rate of microbes to present enhanced humoral defense. According to a previous study on humoral defense in gregarious locusts, we assumed a 1.5-fold in the growth rate of microbes to present regular humoral defense of hosts compared to enhanced humoral defenses. Moreover, here, we assumed a phagocyte recovery rate K2 = 0.2 as high virulent pathogens, and K2 = 0.8 as low virulent pathogens. At a given time point, the sum of the K2 and K3 rates is 1.0. To investigate the different status of virulence of pathogens, enhanced humoral and cellular defenses, we conducted total 8 statuses for comparing the hemocytes survival time and microbe elimination time (Fig. 1B and Table 1).

Parameters for stochastic simulation of hemocytes and microbe growth

Although both enhanced humoral and cellular defenses can eliminate low virulence microbes within the shortest time (status 2), the host showed a shorter survival time with high virulence microbial infection (status = 3, t = 5.947, n = 0) (Fig. 1C, Left) than the host with low cellular defense and enhanced humoral defense (status 6, t = 6.752, n = 0) (Fig. 1D, Left). These results suggested that enhanced cellular and humoral defenses did not always benefit the hosts.

Interestingly, enhanced humoral defense with low cellular defense costs more time to eliminate low-virulence microbes (status = 8, t = 6.01, M = 0) (Fig. 1D, Right) compared to enhanced cellular defense with low humoral defense (status = 4, t = 2.788, M = 0) (Fig. 1C, Right). The stochastic simulation indicated that enhanced humoral with low cellular defenses provides the optimal strategy for host survival during high-virulence pathogen infection despite an extended interaction between the host and low-virulence microbes.

To verify the strategy of optimal immunity in gregarious and solitary locusts, we compared the differences in cellular defenses between them (Fig. 2A). Flow cytometry was used to examine the proportion and capacity of phagocytes after injection with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled conidia of M. anisopliae (Fig. 2B). Gregarious locusts showed a lower phagocytic ability than solitary locusts after counting the same hemocytes at different concentrations of fungal conidia (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Moreover, the differential phagocytic ability was evaluated by comparing FITC intensity. Gregarious locusts showed a significantly lower proportion of hemocytes (4.68 1.48%) than solitary locusts (10.35 1.94%, n = 12, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2D), and gregarious locusts also showed a lower FITC mean value (342 58.68) than solitary locusts (544.12 52.56, n = 12, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, an invitro phagocytosis assay was used to observe the phagocytic ability of adherent hemocytes, which are mostly plasmatocytes, showing that gregarious locusts reduced phagocytosis (n = 44, P = 0.026) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 BD). Thus, the hemocytes of gregarious locusts exhibited significantly lower phagocytic ability than those of solitary locusts. Combined with model simulation, gregarious locusts employed a defense strategy of low cellular defenses, whereas solitary locusts preferred enhanced cellular defenses.

Crowded locusts reduced phagocytosis to conidia of M. anisopliae. To investigate the effects of cellular defense in host resist high-virulence infection, we used the altered immunity of locust to observe the differential cellular defense between locust two phases. (A) Locust displays a reversible phase change between solitary and gregarious phases in response to low and high population density, respectively. Solitary and gregarious locusts. (B) For phagocytosis ability, phagocytic hemocytes of engulfing FITC-labeled conidia were successfully identified by flow cytometry. DIC: differential interference contrast. (C) The higher level of phagocytic cells was displayed in solitary locust than gregarious locusts after counting the positive hemocytes in the 10,000 cell counts. G: hemocytes sample of gregarious locusts; S: hemocytes sample of solitary locusts. (D) Proportion of phagocytic cells in gregarious locust was less than that of solitary locusts (Right, n = 12, P < 0.001), and showed lower capability of engulfing conidia (Left, n = 12, P < 0.001). Asterisk indicates the significance (P < 0.01).

To understand the mechanism of distinct cellular defenses in locusts, we conducted transcriptome analysis to investigate the gene expression profiles in solitary and gregarious locusts. Transcriptome sequencing of pre- and postinfected locusts by the pathogenic fungus M. anisopliae generated >140 million paired-end reads. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using the DEGseq software after alignment of reads to the locust reference genome (28). Among these genes, 552 and 326 were uniquely regulated in infected solitary and gregarious locusts, respectively (Fig. 3A).

Transcriptional analyzed the differential expression of hemocytes between solitary and gregarious locusts. (A) Venn diagram showed the distinct and shared transcripts for hemocytes of pre- and post- conidia infection between solitary and gregarious locusts. (B) Hierarchical analysis of differentially expressed genes (1,990 genes, adjust P < 0.005) of hemocytes before and after conidia infection showed the different defense strategies in the two locust phases. Upper box and Lower box indicates the distinct prophylactically expressed genes for resisting infection in hemocytes of gregarious and solitary locusts respectively. GC: control sample of gregarious locusts; SC: control sample of solitary locusts; GI: conidia-infected sample of gregarious locust; SI: conidia-infected sample of solitary locusts; gnbp1: gram-negative binding protein 1; pirk: poor Imd response upon knockin; tnf: tumor necrosis factor; (C) qPCR results indicated that gregarious locusts prophylactically expressed the effectors transcripts of dfp and gnbp1 but not attacin. (D) qPCR results indicated that solitary locusts prophylactically expressed cytokine tnf and phagocytosis related receptor eater. Asterisk indicates the significance (n = 12, P < 0.01). (E) Immunoblot analysis of the differential activation of JNK phosphorylation in hemocytes of solitary and gregarious locusts. G: sample of gregarious locusts; S: sample of solitary locusts. Data presented as mean SEM.

Hierarchical clustering analysis of the total DEGs (1,990 genes, q-value < 0.05, P < 0.001) showed that hemocytes of solitary and gregarious locusts exhibited significantly different patterns of gene expression, implying different defense strategies (Fig. 3B). In the upper cluster, gregarious hemocytes prophylactically employed immune genes, including defense proteins, serine proteases, lysozyme, and gram-negative binding protein1 (gnbp1), to fight against fungal infection; in the lower cluster, the hemocytes of solitary locusts prophylactically employed genes, including eater, tumor necrosis factor (tnf), and pirk, to resist infection (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Tables S1 and S2). Importantly, hemocytes of solitary locusts highly expressed the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha factor (LITA) gene (SI Appendix, Table S1), which can induce TNF expression. Pirk encodes gene of negative regulator of IMD pathway in respond to gram-negative bacteria, and LITAF was induced by LPS from gram-negative bacteria. These results implied that solitary locusts may have large amounts of gram-negative bacteria.

Analysis of the differentially expressed genes of hemocytes in solitary and gregarious locusts in response to fungal infection and gene ontology (GO) enrichment showed that hemocytes of gregarious locusts preferred hydrolysis activity, while hemocytes of solitary locusts used biological processes, including cell communication, signal transduction, and single organism signaling (SI Appendix, Table S3). At the basal differentially expressed genes between hemocytes of solitary and gregarious locusts, gene ontology enrichment showed that hemocytes of gregarious locusts applied catalytic activity, including peptidoglycan and glycosaminoglycan, while hemocytes of solitary locusts preferred transport activity (SI Appendix, Table S2).

qPCR of selected differentially expressed genes confirmed the results of transcriptome analysis (r2 = 0.93) (SI Appendix, Table S3). Furthermore, gregarious locusts prophylactically expressed the immune effector gnbp1 (n = 12, P = 0.0102) and defense protein (dfp) (n = 12, P < 0.001) in hemocytes in response to fungal infection (Fig. 3C). In addition, there was no significant difference in the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (n = 12, P = 0.435) between solitary and gregarious locusts (Fig. 3C). Among various receptors for phagocytosis including PGRP-LE, draper and nimrod, receptor eater expression of solitary locusts showed higher level compared to gregarious locusts (n = 12, P = 0.0002) (Fig. 3D). Because the hemocytes of solitary locusts express the TNF inducer LITAF at a highly basal level, TNF plays a vital role in regulating the optimal defense of locusts in response to density changes. Furthermore, we observed that solitary locusts increased the cytokine tnf for the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (Fig. 3E). These results suggest that TNF modulates the receptor and effectors to regulate cellular defenses of locusts.

Based on phylogenetic analysis, locust TNF was clustered into a clade of eigers of Drosophila. Furthermore, we successfully knocked down tnf and eater expression in the hemocytes (Fig. 4A). Knockdown of tnf significantly decreased eater expression (nS = 12, PS = 0.0002) and increased gnbp1 expression (nS = 12, PS = 0.003) in the hemocytes of solitary locusts (Fig. 4B). Knockdown of tnf decreased the proportion of phagocytic cells in solitary locusts (nS = 12, PS = 0.017, but did not affect their phagocytic capacity (Fig. 4C). Knockdown of eater significantly decreased the proportion of phagocytes (nS = 12, PS = 0.0315) but did not affect the capacity of phagocytes (Fig. 4D). Improvement in TNF levels by injection of purified recombinant TNF protein into gregarious locusts significantly reduced gnbp1 production (nG = 12, PG < 0.001) and promoted eater expression (nG = 12, PG = 0.0022) (Fig. 4E). Moreover, recombinant TNF increased the proportion of phagocytic hemocytes (nG = 12, PG = 0.0082) and phagocytic capacity (nG = 12, PG = 0.0105) in gregarious locusts (Fig. 4F). Thus, TNF simultaneously regulated phagocytic receptors and immune effectors in solitary locusts.

Locust TNF simultaneously regulated the phagocytosis and effectors production. In hemocytes of locust, (A) mRNA expression level of tnf and eater can be significantly reduced by RNAi knockdown. (B) After reduced the locust TNF (Lmtnf) expression in solitary locusts, phagocytosis receptor eater was significantly decreased, while effector gnbp1 expression was increased by qPCR analysis. (C) Flowcytometry results showed that knockdown Lmtnf expression by dsRNAi decreased the phagocytic hemocytes and did not affect the capability of phagocytosis in solitary locusts. (D) Flowcytometry results showed that knockdown eater expression by dsRNAi decreased the phagocytic hemocytes and did not affect the capability of phagocytosis in solitary locusts. (E) After injection of recombinant LmTNF, phagocytosis receptor eater was significantly increased while effector gnbp1 expression was decreased by qPCR analysis in gregarious locusts. (F) Flowcytometry results showed that injection of LmTNF increased both the proportion of phagocytic hemocytes and the capability of phagocytosis in gregarious locusts. LmTu: locust Tubulin; LmTNF; locust TNF; inf: infection. Asterisk indicates the significance (P < 0.01). Data presented as mean SEM.

To determine the effects of TNF on locust survival after fungal infection, we altered TNF levels by TNF protein injection or RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown. Injection of additional TNF protein significantly reduced the mean lifespan of gregarious locusts from 8.1 0.36.5 0.3 d (nG = 49, PLmTubulin vs. LmTNF = 0.001) (Fig. 5A). On the contrary, reduced TNF by RNAi knockdown in the solitary locusts significantly increased the mean lifespan from 6.6 0.37.5 0.4 d after fungal infection (nS = 32, PdsGFP vs. dsTNF = 0.013) (Fig. 5B). However, reduced TNF levels in gregarious locusts and increased TNF levels in solitary locusts did not significantly affect their lifespan (nG = 48, PLmTubulin vs. dsTNF = 0.287; nS = 29, PdsGFP vs. LmTNF = 0.616). At low levels of TNF, phagocytosis of pathogens by hemocytes was inhibited, while pathogens were coated by high levels of effectors. However, high levels of TNF enhanced phagocytosis, and the escaped pathogens increased the risk of systemic infection (Fig. 5C). Thus, TNF plays an important role in balancing cellular and humoral defenses during locust adaptation to crowded conditions.

TNF impaired locust defense against the infection of M. anisopliae. After changing the TNF expression level in locusts, the survival of locusts infected by fungi (M. anisophilae) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods. (A) Increasing TNF level by injection of recombinant TNF proteins reduced the life span of gregarious locusts. (nG = 49, PLmTublin vs. LmTNF = 0.001). G.LmTubulin: gregarious locusts injected with recombinant tubulin protein; G.LmTNF: gregarious locusts injected with recombinant TNF protein; G.dsTNF: gregarious locusts reduced TNF expression by dsRNAi; G.ctr: gregarious locusts without fungal infections. (B) Knock down of TNF level by dsRNAi extended the life span of solitary locusts. (nS = 32, PdsGFP vs. dsTNF = 0.013). S.dsTNF: solitary locusts reduced TNF expression by dsRNAi; S.LmTNF: solitary locusts injected with recombinant TNF protein; S. dsGFP: solitary locusts injected with dsGFP; S.ctr: individuals of solitary locusts without fungal infections. (C) Schematic mechanisms showed that TNF affected host survival after pathogens infection. Low level of TNF ensured the effectors production and quarantined the pathogens to limit harmful effects. High level of TNF in solitary locusts enhanced the phagocytosis for pathogen clearance.

In our study, the combination of mathematical models and experiments indicated that gregarious and solitary locusts employed different immune strategies of humoral defense or phagocytosis in response to infection by fungal pathogens. Although our previous research showed that gregarious locusts display high-level humoral defenses, mathematical simulation suggested that gregarious adopt high humoral defenses and require low cellular defenses to resist lethal fungal infection. Based on the differential cellular defenses between solitary and gregarious locusts, we found that TNF modulated the locust defense strategy switch in response to changes in the population density. These findings provide critical clues for understanding density-dependent prophylactic immunity and designing novel biopesticides for pest control.

This stochastic simulation method provides an available approach to understand not only pathogen infections (29, 30) but also the altered immunity affected by environmental conditions. The model in this study predicted that hosts with immune status 3 with high humoral and high cellular defenses (high rate of phagocytosis) showed shorter survival times compared to hosts with immune status 6 (high humoral and low cellular defenses) after lethal pathogen infections. In fact, our results showed that gregarious locusts preferred high humoral and low cellular defenses to resist fungal infections. Other studies have shown that cellular defenses have deleterious effects on host defenses against intracellular pathogen infections (31, 32). After testing various parameters of pathogens, we found that humoral defenses dominated the host immune defenses, suggesting alternative results to previous research (15). Thus, gregarious locusts with high humoral and low cellular defenses showed a longer time to interact with pathogens, indicating a tolerant defense strategy in line with our previous research (3). Solitary locusts with high cellular defenses and low humoral defenses can rapidly remove nonlethal pathogen infections, providing an extended health time window for reproduction. Furthermore, the altered immunity of locusts in response to population density showed great potential to reveal host strategies for adaptation to environmental changes.

In this study, we confirmed that TNF modulates the locust defense strategy switch in response to changes in the population density. We observed that TNF played a role in regulating the altered immunity of locusts because transcriptome analysis of solitary and gregarious locusts showed variations in LITAF, which can induce TNF expression. We showed that TNF can significantly increase the phagocytic ability of hemocytes and suppress effector expression in solitary locusts. Low TNF levels in gregarious locusts allowed effector expression, including that of DFP and GNBP1. These effectors can initiate the encapsulation of pathogens (33) and degrade pathogen-associated molecular patterns (-1,3-glucans) to attenuate the immune cascades for tolerance defense (3). However, we found that the gregarious locusts did not enhance AMP expression in the hemolymph, suggesting that the constitutive expression of AMPs is harmful to the limited resources of gregarious locusts because of the high cost of AMP production and the high concentration of AMPs required for killing pathogens (34). TNF is a metabolic hormone that inhibits animal growth by suppressing insulin production (21). The reduction in TNF levels can enhance not only the interactions between hosts and pathogens during infection but also the nutrition consumption for growth in animal life history.

By injecting recombinant TNF protein, we found that high levels of TNF protein significantly reduced the lifespan of gregarious locusts. In control practice and laboratory bioassays, gregarious locusts always exhibit much stronger resistance to fungal pathogens than solitary locusts (2, 3). Gregarious locust swarms are the main control targets in field management practices. Because LPS from gram-negative bacteria can directly induce TNF expression by increasing the expression of LITAF (35), the gut microbiota for regulating host immunity may dominate the altered immunity of gregarious and solitary locusts. After investigation of the symbiont bacteria of locust, gregarious locusts adapted large amounts of gram-positive bacteria such as Weissella and Enterococcus, implying little LPS for induction of LITAF, whereas solitary locusts showed dominant gram-negative bacteria Enterobacter and Betaproteobacteria with sufficient LPS for LITAF induction (3638). Interestingly, the use of bacteria for locust control has not continued since the 1950s (39). However, our evidence suggests that the use of a combination of bacteria and fungi to control gregarious locusts is a feasible approach. Our findings provide critical cues for understanding density-dependent prophylactic immunity and designing novel biopesticides for pest control.

Migratory locusts were collected from the North China Plain (Huanghua, Hebei Province), and two locust phases were established as previously described (40). Gregarious locusts were reared in large, well-ventilated cages (25 cm 25 cm 25 cm) at densities of 200 to 300 insects per cage. Solitary locusts were individually reared under physical, visual, and olfactory isolation conditions using a ventilated cage (10 cm 10 cm 25 cm) with charcoal-filtered compressed air. These conditions maintained the phase traits required for reversible phase transition. Both gregarious and solitary cultures were reared under a 14:10 light/dark photoperiod at 30 2C on a diet of fresh greenhouse-grown wheat seedlings and bran.

The kinetic process of microbial and hemocyte growth is shown as follows: N, number of hemocytes; M, number of microbes; Pha, number of phagocytes with microbes.

N N + N (self-renew: )

M M + M (self-renew: )

M+N Pha (phagocytes ratio: K1)

Pha M (microbe survival: K3)

Pha N (hemocytes survival: K2)

The example program of simulation is listed in the SI Appendix, Table S4 for GillespieSSA R package.

There are different forms of M. anisopliae in the life cycle during the infection of locusts, including 1) adhesion of conidia on the locust cuticle, 2) germination of the conidia and formation of an appressorium, 3) penetration of the germination tube through the cuticle into the hemocoel of locust, 4) production and multiplication of blastospores in the hemocoel, 5) mummified insect cadaver filled with mycelium of M. anisopliae, 6) outgrowth of hyphal strands, and 7) growth of conidiophores with conidia-building cells forming sterigmata.

To infect the locusts, we used male locust individuals after 4 d molting according to our previous study (3). Briefly, the locusts in the solitary and gregarious phases were inoculated with 2 L peanut oil containing 1 106 conidia under the pronotum. This method is noninvasive, and peanut oil control has negligible effects on locusts. The locusts were reared under a 14:10 light/dark photoperiod at 30 2C on a diet of fresh greenhouse-grown wheat seedlings and bran. The mortality of locusts was recorded twice daily. Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method in SPSS13.0. Results were listed in SI Appendix, Table S5.

Unless otherwise indicated, the chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The recombinant cytokine TNF was dissolved in Leibovitz's L-15 culture medium at 100 ng/mL, and injected at 200 pg per locust. Other raw materials, including plasmids, PCR primers, and antibodies, are shown in SI Appendix, Table S6.

Four days after molting, locust individuals were injected according to modified procedures. In brief, locusts from each phase were injected with 2 L of Leibovitz's L-15 medium containing 1 108 heat-killed conidia (M. anisopliae, FITC-labeled) into the hemocoel in the second ventral segment of the abdomen, and L-15 medium served as the control. Hemocytes were collected 3 h after the conidia were injected. The 10 L of hemolymph was rapidly collected into 1.0 mL precooled L-15 media. Before loading on a BD Calibur analyzer, the hemolymph was centrifuged at 400 g for 5 min and then suspended in the 200 L cell pallet in L-15 media. Control and positive samples were used for calibration. A total of 10,000 hemocytes from each sample were counted to evaluate phagocytosis. The results were analyzed using software FCS express 4.0 and FlowJo .

Proteins for injection were expressed in Escherichia coli (locust TNF domain: nucleotides 374826, GenBank accession: KP233713, locust Tubulin domain: nucleotides 152811, GenBank accession: KP844460) using the Invitrogen pET-28a vector. The proteins were purified with Ni-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) and polished by gel filtration with CM-25 Sephadex in locust saline buffer before injection. After determining the protein concentration by the BCA assay, each locust was injected with 20 ng of target proteins.

The macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was used to examine the expression of TNF regulated by adenosine. Because the cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum containing adenosine, we used 35 M adenosine to stimulate the responses of mouse cells. To investigate the stable effects of extracellular adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine and NMBPR (70 M) were used to observe the responses of macrophages. Because of the toxicity of 2-chloroadenosine, we used a concentration of 3.5 M to observe the cellular response. After seeding the cells in 6-well plates overnight, drugs were added to the culture. After 6 h, RPMI1640 without fetal bovine serum was used to wash the cells. Next, 1 mL of TRIzol was added to the wells to lyse the cells. According to the TRIzol manufacturers instructions, RNA and proteins from cells were extracted for further analysis.

We used a high-throughput sequencing platform (HiSEq. 2500) to analyze the expression of genes in the hemocytes of pre- and postinfected gregarious and solitary locusts. Four days after infection with fungal conidia (M. anisopliae) or peanut oil, three replicates (15 individuals per replicate) of each sample were collected for analysis. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Life Sciences), and purity was examined. Following, 25 g messenger RNA (mRNA ) was purified using magnetic beads, according to the manufacturers instructions (Illumina). After high-throughput paired-end sequencing, the raw reads were aligned using Bowtie software, and abundance estimation was performed as previously described. Differentially expressed transcripts were analyzed using DESeq. The locust reference genome and gene functional analyses were performed using methods described in previous research (3, 10). Raw reads of the four samples were downloaded from the NCBI SRA server (accession number: SRA072524).

To observe the expression of target genes, qPCR was performed in accordance with the standard protocols for thermocyclers (Roche). At least three biological replicates (four individuals per replicate) were pooled for the analysis of three parallel technical replicates. The mRNA of each sample was extracted from the hemolymph using TRIzol reagent (Life Sciences). The OD260/OD280 ratios were then measured. cDNA was synthesized from 2 g total RNA using an MLV reverse II system (Promega). The primers used are shown in the SI Appendix). The actin sequence of L. migratoria (GenBank accession: AF370793) was used as an internal control and the target gene sequences were cloned into pGEM-T Easy for standard curve calibration. The specificity of amplification was confirmed by melting curve analysis.

We used the double-stranded RNA mediated interference (dsRNAi) method to knock down target gene expression. The templates for dsRNA preparation were PCR-derived fragments between the two T7 promoter sequences. The fragments of each gene were as follows: gfp (nucleotides ORF35-736, GenBank accession: L29345), Locust tnf (nucleotides 128829, GenBank accession: KP233713), and eater (nucleotides 442904, GenBank accession: KP233712). Single-stranded RNA fragments were synthesized using a T7 Transcription Kit (Promega). The annealed dsRNA was purified by ethanol precipitation and dissolved in sterilized L-15 medium buffer at 5 g/L until use. Finally, each insect was injected with 20 g dsRNA for the experiments.

Hemocyte proteins were extracted from TRIzol samples after RNA preparation. After extraction, the protein pellets were dried at room temperature for 12 h. Proteins were then weighed and dissolved in rehydration buffer without ampholytes (Bio-Rad) at a concentration of 20 g/L. Following, 100 g of proteins per lane was separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Life Sciences). After blocking with 5% skimmed milk, the primary antibody was diluted to 1:1,000 and incubated overnight at 4C. The secondary antibody (A1949, Sigma) was used to detect the primary antibody at a 1:12,000 dilution and visualized by chemiluminescence (Thermo) in a Transilluminator OUS (Carestream).

For all qPCR results, the data are presented as mean SEM, and the P values were calculated using the MannWhitney U test provided by SPSS 13.0. Other methods for calculating significance are specified in the figure legends.

All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.

We thank Drs. Xian C. Li, Hong Zhang, and Dr. Zhen Zou for commenting on and revising the earlier version of the manuscript. We are particularly grateful to the anonymous reviewers, who provided useful comments and suggestions for improving our manuscript. This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB11010000), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M530765), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670420).

Author contributions: Y.W. and L.K. designed research; Y.W., X.T., and S.Y. performed research; X.T., S.Y., and L.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Y.W., X.T., P.Y., L.L., and L.K. analyzed data; and Y.W., Y.Z., and L.K. wrote the paper.

Reviewers: J.R., Freie Universitt Berlin; and S.W., Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2120835119/-/DCSupplemental.

See the article here:
Variation of TNF modulates cellular immunity of gregarious and solitary locusts against fungal pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae - pnas.org