Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

This proposed bill would give Tennessee parents control over their child’s social media accounts – News Channel 5 Nashville

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WTVF) We know there are a lot of parents out there who care what their kids see on social media. As it becomes more of a concern, some state lawmakers want to give parents more control over their kids' accounts.

It is called the "Protecting Children from Social Media Act" and it would require parents' permission for kids to access their accounts.

This bill was proposed by Representative William Lamberth of Sumner County. He wants sites to verify the age of people making accounts.

If the person is a minor, this bill would require those sites to get parental consent.

If a child already has an account, verification must happen within 14 days of the child attempting to access their existing account.

Once verified, the site does not have to verify again, but parents have the ability to revoke their consent when they want, taking away a child's access to the account.

The bill also proposes giving parents the ability to supervise the minor's account, including viewing privacy settings, setting time restrictions, and implementing break times when kids would not be able to access their account.

Under the proposal, the attorney general would investigate the company if it did not follow the rules.

Remember Davin Lucas? Thanks to his local community, he has a new wheelchair

It's going to be tough to find a better story than this one it literally brought tears to my eyes. Shortly after Kelsey's first story aired on Davin, I got an email from Permobil that basically said: "Carrie, we've got this." And boy did they! It truly is amazing what this community can do. Big cheers to all who made a difference for Davin!

-Carrie Sharp

More here:
This proposed bill would give Tennessee parents control over their child's social media accounts - News Channel 5 Nashville

Why Is Shari Redstone, Ruler of a Vast Media Kingdom, Weighing a Sale? – The New York Times

Paramount Pictures, the storied studio behind hits like The Godfather and Raiders of the Lost Ark, has had several owners over the last century: Its co-founder Adolph Zukor. The industrial conglomerate Gulf+Western. At one point, it was a stand-alone public company.

But for nearly three decades, Paramounts fate has been controlled by the Redstone family, after its pugnacious patriarch, Sumner Redstone, won a bidding war for the studio in 1994.

That may be about to change. Shari Redstone, Mr. Redstones daughter, is weighing a sale of her familys controlling interest in Paramounts parent company just five years after she won a fight to retain control of her familys media empire.

Suitors for both Ms. Redstones stake and the company she controls are already lining up, including Warner Bros. Discovery, the owner of HBO and the Warner Bros. movie studio, and Skydance, the movie studio that helps produce hit Paramount franchises like Top Gun and Mission: Impossible.

So far, the pursuit of Paramount has the makings of a drama fit for the silver screen. Heres the story so far:

Ms. Redstone, 69, presides over a vast media empire that includes Paramount Pictures, MTV, Nickelodeon and CBS. But her rise to the top was not simple.

For years, Ms. Redstone toiled away at National Amusements, the theater chain that doubles as a holding company for Paramount. A lawyer by training, she demonstrated an early aptitude for the media business but was overshadowed by her aging father, who refused to relinquish control even as his mental capacity waned.

As the family business began to falter, Ms. Redstone began to assert herself more. She thwarted an attempt by Philippe Dauman, one of her fathers lieutenants, to sell a stake in Paramount Pictures in 2016. One of her allies, Bob Bakish, became his permanent replacement as chief executive.

Two years later, she won another battle. Leslie Moonves, whose programming prowess earned him the nickname the man with the golden gut, led a revolt against Ms. Redstone, urging a Delaware court to strip her family of its company control. Ms. Redstone prevailed after Mr. Moonves was accused of sexual harassment and forced out of the company. (Mr. Moonves has denied allegations of nonconsensual sex.)

In 2019, months after Mr. Moonves was forced out, the boards of CBS and Viacom companies controlled by National Amusements began exploring a merger. The deal, which Ms. Redstone championed, put the Paramount movie studio and Viacoms bundle of cable channels, including MTV and Nickelodeon, under the same corporate umbrella as CBS and the book publisher Simon & Schuster.

After the merger, Ms. Redstone encouraged the combined company eventually renamed Paramount to use its heft to make an ambitious foray into the streaming wars, stocking its Paramount+ service with shows and movies from both Viacom and CBS. The company has bet big on building a healthy and profitable streaming business before its traditional TV networks, which are lucrative but in terminal decline, fade out.

Paramount was once so mighty that people in Hollywood referred to it by the nickname the Mountain, a reference to its logo of a snow-capped peak encircled by stars.

But these days, the company is more of a melting iceberg.

Paramounts portfolio of cable networks has been battered by the same cord-cutting and advertiser weakness that have afflicted its industry peers and is facing analyst-estimated subscriber losses of nearly 25 percent over the next two years. Wall Street is unconvinced that Paramounts money-losing streaming business will ever be able to compete with the likes of Netflix. Paramount+ has a 6 percent share of the revenue market, while Netflix has 47 percent and Disneys streaming services have a combined 23 percent.

Paramounts movie studio has done its best to revive aging franchises like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and keep Mission: Impossible running, but it ranks last among Hollywoods five legacy film companies in domestic market share and posted an operating loss of $143 million for the first nine months of this year.

Despite those headwinds, Paramount has made some progress. The streaming service has 63 million subscribers globally, and the companys Pluto TV free streaming service generates more than $1 billion in annual revenue, up from $70 million when it was acquired in 2019.

There are also financial pressures at National Amusements. Historically, the bulk of the holding companys profits have come from dividends on the Paramount stock it owns, roughly 10 percent of that company. But financial pressures forced Paramount to sharply reduce its dividend, cutting into profits at National Amusements.

Now, National Amusements is incapable of generating cash, according to a May estimate from S&P Global Market Intelligence, and owes about $25 million in annual interest cash payments.

Why is Ms. Redstone willing to sell her controlling stake in the company? It may come down to the pressures facing both National Amusements and Paramount. As Rich Greenfield, an analyst at LightShed Partners, put it in a recent client note, Paramount has a bleak future ahead.

National Amusements 10 percent stake in Paramount a piece worth more than $1 billion at todays prices is still a prize for any deep-pocketed investor who wants control of some of the most prestigious media assets in the United States. Ms. Redstone could sell National Amusements stake in Paramount, or promote a deal to sell the entire company. Or she could elect not to sell, essentially betting that the companys prospects will improve over time.

Ms. Redstone is being advised on her options by BDT & MSD Partners, a merchant bank founded by Byron Trott, a former Goldman Sachs partner who consults with some of Americas wealthiest and best-connected family business owners. So far, National Amusements has held talks with media companies including Skydance, Warner Bros. Discovery and Netflix and technology firms such as Amazon and Apple, according to four people with knowledge of the discussions.

Warner Bros. Discovery has also raised the topic of a merger with Paramount directly. David Zaslav, the chief executive of Warner Bros. Discovery, broached the topic over lunch on Tuesday with Mr. Bakish. Those discussions, which are in their early stages, are separate from Ms. Redstones discussions about a sale of her stake in National Amusements.

Paramounts suitors and Ms. Redstone will have to solve a messy equation to reach a deal.

Any buyer of Ms. Redstones stake in National Amusements will most likely need to pay a bonus on the market value of her shares commonly known as a control premium for the rights to steer Paramount. For the owners of a privately held company like Skydance, that requires raising capital. For a publicly traded firm like Warner Bros. Discovery, that means convincing shareholders that the increased price is worth the additional investment.

Some of the suitors are also subject to the same financial pressures facing Paramount. Though it has paid down some of its debt, Warner Bros. Discovery is burdened with more than $40 billion in leverage, the price of its merger with AT&Ts WarnerMedia division. Warner Bros. Discovery also runs the risk of a tax penalty if it strikes a deal before the two-year anniversary of that merger in April, which could complicate deal making.

There are nonfinancial considerations, too. To make drastic changes, any buyer of National Amusements would have to work through the board of Paramount.

If Skydances bid to acquire National Amusements is successful, for example, the company will probably need to nominate its own slate of directors at Paramount, which could then contemplate moves like merging Skydance with Paramount Pictures, according to two people familiar the negotiations.

Brooks Barnes contributed reporting.

Read the original post:
Why Is Shari Redstone, Ruler of a Vast Media Kingdom, Weighing a Sale? - The New York Times

Poland’s President Duda Vetoes 2024 Bill Over Media Control – BNN Breaking

Polish President Andrzej Duda Vetoes 2024 Spending Bill in Response to Media Control Changes

In an unprecedented move, Polands President Andrzej Duda has vetoed the 2024 spending bill, forming a palpable rift in the countrys political landscape. The veto is a pointed response to the recent actions of the new government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, which assumed control of the countrys public media.

President Dudas decision to veto the spending bill underscores his palpable disapproval of the changes implemented in public media management. The veto is a clear reflection of the escalating tensions between the presidency and the government, particularly around control over media institutions. The situation brings to the fore the critical role of media independence in maintaining a balanced power dynamic within the Polish government.

President Dudas rejection of the spending bill marks a significant development in Polands political sphere. It signals the potential for ongoing political conflicts within the countrys leadership. The move is likely to lead to further discussions and negotiations among Polands political actors as they grapple with differing views on media control and fiscal policy. The veto, which President Duda cites as a response to a gross violation of the constitution, will undoubtedly deepen the existing standoff over state television.

The Tusk government, which came to power in December 2023, has been instrumental in the controversial takeover of public media. The new administrations action to seize control of public media was widely condemned as illegal. The governments decision to replace the CEOs of state media and institute a 30% pay increase for teachers has been met with staunch opposition by President Duda, culminating in the veto of the spending bill. The public media shakeup is viewed by many as an attempt by the new government to consolidate power, leading to accusations of turning Polish public media into partisan propaganda outlets.

Read the original post:
Poland's President Duda Vetoes 2024 Bill Over Media Control - BNN Breaking

Israeli media failed to manipulate truth this time, says media union head | News – Yeni afak English

Secretary-general of the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU) said that Israel always attempts to control the media and narrative, but it will not succeed this time.

Describing the events in Gaza as "heartbreaking," ABU Secretary-General Ahmed Nadeem told Anadolu: It's extremely inhuman what is being done in Gaza. I think, this time, they are not able to control the narrative. Everybody knows what is going on. The truth is very much clear through other media that's available to people."

Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union is the world's largest broadcasting association.

Nadeem emphasized: As media entities we should be strong, we should go with the truth and we should explain the truth to the people.

Reminding that everyone can easily access the news they want today, Nadeem said it is important for the media to play a guiding role in determining what the truth is, distinguishing between the right and wrong information.

Nadeem noted that media organizations and news agencies in Asia, especially in Trkiye, have done an excellent job regarding what is happening in Gaza.

Drawing attention to Israel's media 'manipulations,' Nadeem said: "(Israel) always try to control the media, control the narrative. But this time, it's not going to work. Because this time everybody knows what is the truth. And this truth is always available around us through social media and other platforms. So this time the narrative won't change."

Nadeem stated that conveying the truth to the public is the best activity that can be done and emphasized that the media should operate on this principle.

Touching upon the role of artificial intelligence in the media, Nadeem said despite the existence of individuals who misuse artificial intelligence and generate a lot of misinformation, it is possible to use this new tool correctly, and everyone needs to be educated on this matter.

Link:
Israeli media failed to manipulate truth this time, says media union head | News - Yeni afak English

Public Employees: "They Control Everything We Say on Social Media" – Confidencial

Enrique says he's been having nightmares for several days. Most of the dreams involve police officers. He explains that "he is feeling very paranoid and afraid," a sensation that, according to him, he shares with the majority of government employees due to the wave of dismissals, constant interrogations and imprisonments prescribed by the dictatorship of Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo. But added to that is a new form of control: social media.

"We knew they were watching us, but in the last few weeks they have started being more vigilant of our social media accounts. They monitor everything we do personally, and now also virtually," says Enrique.

This young man, who works in an office of the Judiciary branch in Managua, says there are several people "who have been fired for posting something on social media that provokes [the regime's] discomfort."

Enrique describes the work environment as challenging because "you don't know what you can and can't say on social media." Some workers have even stopped posting or have simply closed their accounts.

"But even doing that can provoke [their] ire. With these people, you never know," he warns.

Since April 2018, the Ortega-Murillo regime has imposed a reign of terror on public employees. Workers raising their voices, demanding their rights, or criticizing the government is unthinkable. But social media, which was, for many, "an escape valve," is now an increasingly dangerous terrain.

"In my case, I only had Facebook, but at the insistence of my bosses I had to create a Twitter [now X] account in 2018, because we were urged [to post there] in order to gain ground on social media at a time when the complaints of [human rights] violations were being reported by thousands of Nicaraguans," Enrique explains.

Enrique recalls that one of his office colleagues was threatened during the COVID-19 pandemic for posting about taking precautions to avoid getting infected. In a meeting, they showed him his Facebook posts and accused him of being a "traitor." He became so afraid that he left Nicaragua a few weeks later.

"They've fired people just for publishing memes," says Enrique, who believes that the level of control the dictatorship is trying to impose "is crazy."

Enrique also says that most of the hundreds of workers dismissed from the Judiciary had their personal phones confiscated. "We assume that they have been checking everything the workers had on [their phones], from calls and photos to social media," he added.

After more than 12 years of working for the Ministry of Education, Marcela, a schoolteacher in southern Nicaragua, says she is bothered by the fact that teachers can't express themselves freely "about any subject."

"There are some who have been issued warnings for posting photos of Catholic processions. The most recent thing is that we've been banned from talking about Miss Universe," Marcela complains.

Marcela says that when Sheynnis Palacios was crowned Miss Universe on the night of November 18, many people took to the streets to celebrate and post on social media. "I was one of them. We went out in a caravan through several municipalities because we felt it was such an immense joy for all of Nicaragua," she explains.

However, she says that the dictatorship's discourse has changed, and that they went from "pretending to celebrate, to actually threatening" anyone who spoke on the subject.

"They have even imprisoned the Sandinista Tik Toker 'Tropi Kong' for having criticized the presenters on a pro-government [TV] channel. With that you understand that in the dictators' eyes no one can criticize, not even the servile ones who kiss their feet," says Marcela.

In her case, Marcela chose to make all her Facebook posts private. "But nothing guarantees that there isn't surveillance by someone who might want to inform on me, so I have deleted [a lot of] posts and I have chosen to not post almost anything," she laments.

Marcela comments that some fellow teachers have taken on pseudonyms or created new accounts on social media. "But the fear of being watched in some way is always there," she insists.

"In our offices there are people watching us, in our computers they've installed programs to spy on us, our social media is being watched all the time. Although they don't admit it, it's obvious that it happens," says Raul, a government employee in Managua.

Although he considers himself a Sandinista, Raul says he is disappointed in the "hijacking" of the party by the Ortega Murillo family.

Raul says that on several occasions the staff has been summoned to a session to receive talks on social media. "But what they're doing is telling us that we have to post government propaganda because according to them, we have to share all the good news with the people," he recalls.

However, he says there are also many other stories of layoffs over the course of the 10 years he has been working for the government.

"One woman was fired because she shared a meme of Chayo [Rosario Murillo], and another because she shared a photo with a joke about Daniel Ortega," recalls Raul. However, he adds that "none of the posts were offensive."

For Raul, the dictatorship "has no sense of humor" and "they want to have control over us, in how we think and even what we say, whether in the street, at home, at work, or on social media."

In mid-2023, government workers began to receive home visits from the dictatorship's political operators to confirm if they were still Sandinista "militants" (members) and to ask them about their involvement in marches and party activities.

CONFIDENCIAL reported that these visits were made to the homes of public employees who in 2020 had been pressured to get themselves and their family members accredited as Sandinista party militants. "Last year, in June, we received information that government workers were required to get five more people signed up, so now they were checking to see if they are still active," said a source from the Blue and White Monitoring Group.

Then in mid-November 2023, it was reported on social media and via independent media outlets that the dictatorship is forcing all state workers, as well as current party members, to fill out a "single registration form" to obtain militancy status in the context of the upcoming 45th anniversary of the Sandinista revolution.

The registration form requires applicants to provide information such as telephone numbers, email addresses, and social media account information for Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. They also ask for academic information, work experience, history with the party, and socioeconomic data.

Whoever fills out the form must also provide the same information about their spouses, children and siblings, including whether or not they are in the country.

For Enrique, Marcela and Raul, all this indicates that the party "wants to control and know everything about every worker" and their close family circles."They distrust all of us, but on top of that, monitoring our children or siblings is a way to intimidate us, to tell us that tomorrow they could be taken prisoner. It's a way to measure our loyalty to the government, by checking on what our family members say or do," Enrique denounces.

This article was publishedin Spanish in Confidencialandtranslated by our staff.To get the most relevant news from our English coverage delivered straight to your inbox,subscribe to The Dispatch.

View original post here:
Public Employees: "They Control Everything We Say on Social Media" - Confidencial