Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

SharePlay powers new ways to stay connected and share experiences in FaceTime – Apple Newsroom

November 18, 2021

UPDATE

SharePlay powers new ways to stay connected and share experiences in FaceTime

SharePlay is available with AppleFitness+, AppleMusic, AppleTV+, NBA, Paramount+, SHOWTIME, TikTok, Twitch, and many more apps

SharePlay, a powerful set of features for shared experiences while on a FaceTime call, has introduced new ways for Apple users to stay connected. With SharePlay support in Apple TV+, Apple Music, and Apple Fitness+ as well as many of the most popular apps like NBA, TikTok, Twitch, Paramount+, and SHOWTIME users can watch movies and TV shows, listen to music, or complete a workout with friends together on a FaceTime call. SharePlay extends to Apple TV so users can watch on the big screen while using FaceTime on iPhone or iPad. With screen sharing support, users can also browse the web together, look at photos, or show their friends something in a favorite app. SharePlay is available with the release of iOS 15.1, iPadOS 15.1, and tvOS 15.1, and is coming to Mac later this fall.

SharePlay brings a whole new way to connect, share experiences, and have fun together on FaceTime, said Bob Borchers, Apples vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. SharePlay leverages Apples integration of hardware and software to deliver a magical experience across iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV, and works with many Apple services as well as some of the most popular apps in the App Store.

New Ways to Stay Connected Through FaceTime

SharePlay makes it possible for iPhone, iPad, and Mac1 users to share experiences with friends and family while on a FaceTime call. For example, users can chat with each other while having a viewing party, listening to an album with a friend, or completing a fitness challenge together from wherever they are, and SharePlay keeps all of these activities in sync across everyone on FaceTime.

SharePlay sessions offer shared playback controls, so anyone on the FaceTime call can play, pause, or jump ahead while enjoying synced media. With dynamic volume controls, audio from the streaming content will automatically lower when a FaceTime participant is speaking, making it easy to continue the conversation with friends despite a loud scene or climactic chorus. When users prefer to have uninterrupted sound, they can simply tap on the Messages button in the FaceTime controls to jump to a shared thread and keep the conversation going. Each participant in the SharePlay session streams directly from the relevant app on their own device, delivering high-fidelity audio and video. Apple TV supports SharePlay so users can watch shared shows or movies on the big screen while using their personal device to continue connecting with friends over FaceTime.

SharePlay is available with Apple TV+, Apple Music, Apple Fitness+, and some of the most popular apps in the App Store.

In addition to enjoying apps together, users can share their screens to browse the web, look at photos, or help each other out while on a FaceTime call.

Watch Together

Movies and TV shows can be streamed in sync while connecting over FaceTime with friends, offering a rich, real-time connection while watching the same content through apps like Apple TV+, MUBI, Paramount+, and SHOWTIME. Users can even stream live content, like the latest game in the NBA app, or talk with friends over FaceTime while watching a favorite esports stream on Twitch. And soon, users will be able to watch together using apps like BET+, Disney+, ESPN, HBO Max, Hulu, MasterClass, Pantaya, Pluto TV, and Starz.

Listen Together

Users can bring songs, albums, and playlists right into their FaceTime call for a shared listening experience. With Apple Music, users can listen to a much-anticipated new album together or their favorite DJ mix completely in sync. Additional apps will be adding SharePlay support soon, including SoundCloud and TuneIn.

Practice Healthy Habits Together

SharePlay introduces brand new ways to inspire wellness with family and friends. For example, many people find it motivating when fitness is a shared experience, like taking a class together or having some friendly competition with a workout buddy. With the power of SharePlay, users can now work out or meditate together in Apple Fitness+, encourage one another through intervals with SmartGym, or wind down with a bedtime story together with BetterSleep.

Learn Together

With SharePlay, users can learn together despite physical distance. Kahoot! makes it possible to face off live in educational quizzes, Explain Everything allows users to chat over FaceTime while collaborating on a whiteboard, and Night Sky gives users a way to identify stars, planets, constellations, and satellites together.

Have Fun Together

Many developers have introduced entirely new ways to enjoy content in their app. For example, TikTok has added a way for users to watch a unique collection of videos together. Heads Up! fans can now play together even when theyre not in the same location. Cameo gives users a way to enjoy their friends reactions to a celebrity message when they see it for the first time. Popshop Live makes it possible to view shows and shop together. And with Apollo for Reddit, users in a SharePlay session can easily browse their favorite subreddits in sync.

Even more SharePlay experiences are available with apps like Bikemap, Flow by Moleskine Studio, Redfin, and more.

Screen Share Through SharePlay

With screen sharing through SharePlay, the possibilities are endless. Users can show off photos from a recent adventure, browse the web together while collaborating on a project, or teach a friend a skill while answering their questions right in the moment.

Press Contacts

Nadine Haija

Apple

nhaija@apple.com

(408) 862-6490

Jacqueline Roy

Apple

jacqueline_roy@apple.com

(408) 862-4386

Apple Media Helpline

media.help@apple.com

(408) 974-2042

More:
SharePlay powers new ways to stay connected and share experiences in FaceTime - Apple Newsroom

Inside track: Superannuation, funds management & financial services In the media, in practice and courts and legislation – Finance and Banking -…

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

ASFA supports super portfolio disclosureregulationsMedia 12 November 2021 changes to thesuperannuation portfolio holdings disclosure regulations willachieve greater transparency for consumers, according to theAssociation of Superannuation Funds of Australia. More...

Superannuation portfolio holdings disclosureTREASURY 11 November 2021 in a major boostto superannuation transparency, Australians will have access toinformation about how superannuation funds are investing theirmoney following the finalisation of new regulations dealing withportfolio holdings disclosure by superannuation funds. More...

APRA sets out framework for using macroprudential toolsto promote financial stabilityAPRA 11 November 2021 the AustralianPrudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has set outits framework for the use of macroprudential policy measures topromote the stability of Australia's financial system. More...

APRA urges super members to prioritise their own bestfinancial interestsAPRA 10 November 2021 the APRA is urgingsuperannuation members especially those whose MySuperproducts failed the recent performance test to moreactively engage with their super to maximise their retirementfutures. More...

ASIC releases guidance and examples on records ofadviceASIC 05 November 2021 ASIC has released aninformation sheet on records of advice (ROA) andthree ROA examples to provide clarity to financial advisers andadvice. More...

ASIC obtains Federal Court orders against unlicensedinvestment scheme A One Multi ServicesASIC 04 November 2021 ASIC has moved toshut down unlicensed financial services business A One MultiServices Pty Ltd (A One Multi), which is suspectedto be engaging in unlawful activity and protect investors. More...

The Financial Accountability Regime (FAR)progressesFSC 03 November 2021 the FSC notes thatthe FAR Bill is substantially the same as the exposure draftcirculated for public consultation in July 2021, although therehave been a number changes including (a) imposing legal obligationson auditors and actuaries to assist APRA with investigations, (b)imposing accessorial liability on accountable persons in certaincircumstances, and (c) allowing the regulator to publicly disclosecertain details of the register of accountable persons. More...

'Your Super Follows You'TREASURY 01 November 2021 from 1 November2021, where an employee has an existing superannuation account,that account will be 'stapled' and follow them when theychange jobs. This means employers will now pay super contributionsinto their new employee's existing super account unless theemployee nominates a different account. More...

Members urged to check their super as staplingbeginsAIST 01 November 2021 as stapling measurescome into effect, AIST has urged Australian workers to ensurethey're happy with the performance of their super fund and notrisk getting stapled to a dud for life. More...

ASIC commences proceedings against Ferratum Australiafor charging prohibited credit feesASIC 01 November 2021 ASIC has commencedcivil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against FerratumAustralia Pty Ltd (Ferratum) for chargingprohibited fees and and overcharging consumers who paid off loansearly. More...

Super fund trustee snouts in the troughMEDIA 01 November 2021 the country's$3.3 trillion superannuation industry has been rocked byrevelations that some could have been switching their investmentfunds for personal gain. It's the latest scandal to hit thecountry's $3.3 trillion investment management industry, andthis time around it has the potential to tarnish the reputation ofmany of the country's industry super funds (01 November 2921).More...

ASIC Updates

10/11/2021 PF 209Australian financial services licence conditions(reissued)Condition 54 amended to better align its wording withparagraph 7.6.01(1)(na) of the Corporations Regulations and toinclude an administrative requirement for licensees to maintain aregister of their related overseas financial service providers whorely on the exemption under that paragraph.

02/11/2021 INFO155 Shorter PDSs complying withrequirements for superannuation products and simple managedinvestment schemes (reissued)Miscellaneous technical amendments to update, re-order andsimplify guidance including: Removal of introductory Stronger Supercontent; insertion of a new Table 1 and insertion of a new columnin the former Table 1 (now Table 2) outlining the products to whichthe shorter PDS warnings listed are applicable; and the addition ofa new section titled 'What is a simple managed investmentscheme?' moved from INFO 133.Withdrawn: INFO 133 Shorter PDSregime superannuation managed investment schemes and marginlending (relevant information has been incorporated into INFO 155).

ASIC Industry funding: 2020-21 CostRecovery Implementation Statement (CRIS)The statement details ASIC's estimated levies by industrysector and subsector. ASIC released the draft CRIS in July 2021(ASIC MR21-185) for industry feedback. The final statement summarisesthe feedback we received. The actual levies will be published inDecember 2021 and invoiced in January 2022 (11 November 2021). More...

ASIC Corporations (Amendment) Instrument 2021/381Amends the ASIC Corporations (Auditor Independence) Instrument 2021/75and ASIC Corporations (Parent Entity Financial Statements)Instrument 2021/195to change the repeal dates from April 2026 to April 2024.

APRA publishes additional FAQs on the SuperannuationData Transformation Phase 1 reporting standardsThe APRA has published 4 additional frequently askedquestions (FAQs) to provide further guidance toRSE licensees on the reporting standards for Phase 1 of theSuperannuation Data Transformation project.TheFAQs are available on the APRA website at:Frequently AskedQuestions Superannuation Data Transformation (04November 2021).

APRA publishes new frequently asked questions on YourFuture, Your Super performance testThe APRA has published two new frequently asked questions(FAQs) to provide further general guidance on theGovernment's Your Future, Your Super performancetest. The FAQs are available on the APRA websiteat: Your Future, Your SuperFrequently Asked Questions (03 November 2021).

AIST Legislation updatesStay up to date with the status of legislation inAustralia's parliamentSuperannuation Legislation update 11 November2021Superannuation Legislation update 4 November 2021

Commonwealth

CorporationsAmendment (Portfolio Holdings Disclosure) Regulations202111/11/2021 this instrument amends the CorporationsRegulations 2001 to provide how information made publicly availableunder the portfolio holdings disclose regime is to beorganised.

AuditingStandard ASA 2021-5 Amendments to Australian AuditingStandards08/11/2021 this instrument amends ASA (AustralianAuditing Standards) 101, 200, 240, 330, 502, 540, 550, 560, 570,610, 620, 710 and ASRE (Auditing Standard on Review Engagement)2415. The amendments represent editorial corrections to reviseminor inaccuracies, including misspellings and numbering orgrammatical mistakes.

This publication does not deal with every important topic orchange in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitutefor legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader'sspecific circumstances. If you have found this publication ofinterest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advicerelevant to your circumstances please contact one of the namedindividuals listed.

Read more from the original source:
Inside track: Superannuation, funds management & financial services In the media, in practice and courts and legislation - Finance and Banking -...

TROIKA MEDIA GROUP, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (form 10-Q) – marketscreener.com

The following management's discussion and analysis should be read in conjunctionwith the Company's historical consolidated financial statements and the relatednotes thereto included in our audited financial statements for the year endedJune 30, 2021, and the notes thereto. The management's discussion and analysiscontains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, suchas statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Anystatements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-lookingstatements. When used, the words "believe," "plan," "intend," "anticipate,""target," "estimate," "expect" and the like, and/or future tense or conditionalconstructions ("will," "may," "could," "should," etc.), or similar expressions,identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-lookingstatements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actualresults or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by theforward-looking statements in this quarterly report. The Company's actualresults and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipatedin these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Companydoes not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements toreflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this quarterlyreport.

Critical Accounting Policy & Estimates

Our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations section discusses our financial statements, which have been preparedin accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management tomake estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets andliabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount ofrevenues and expenses during the reporting period.

On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, includingthose related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations,and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgmentson historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to bereasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis formaking judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are notreadily apparent from other sources.

Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions andconditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in thepreparation of our financial statements include estimates as to the appropriatecarrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparentfrom other sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sectionsin this discussion and analysis and in the condensed consolidated financialstatements included in this quarterly report.

Troika Media Group, Inc. was incorporated in Nevada in 2003. In October 2016,our secured lenders took control of the Company's then operating subsidiarieswhich ceased operations and are included in discontinued operations. The Companyis a transatlantic agency focusing on branding, digital marketing andperformance media services, using actionable intelligence across all broadcastdigital media and live experiences. On June 12, 2017, we commenced our currentoperations upon the merger with Troika Design Group, Inc., a strategic brandconsultancy with deep expertise in entertainment media, sports, consumer goodsand service brands. On June 29, 2018, we acquired all of the equity interests ofMission Culture LLC and Mission Media Holdings Limited, a company headquarteredin London, with North American operations since 2009, as a brand experience andcommunications agency that specializes in consumer immersion through a culturallens, via live experiences, brand partnerships, public relations and social andinfluencer engagement. On May 21, 2021, we acquired substantially all of theassets of Redeeem LLC (n/k/a Troika IO, Inc.), a peer-to-peer NFT blockchainexchange founded in 2018.

The Impact of the Global COVID-19 Virus

In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized the coronavirus(COVID-19) as a pandemic, and it continues to spread throughout the UnitedStates and the rest of the world with different geographical locations impactedmore than others. The outbreak of COVID-19 and the resulting public and privatesector measures to reduce its transmission, such as the imposition of socialdistancing and orders to work-from-home, stay-at-home and shelter-in-place, haveadversely impacted our business and those of our clients. Businesses haveadjusted, reduced, or suspended operating activities, which has negativelyimpacted the clients we service. We continue to believe our focus on ourstrategic strengths, including talent, our differentiated market strategy andthe relevance of our services, including the longevity of our relationships,will continue to assist our Company as we navigate a rapidly changingmarketplace. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have negatively impacted ourresults of operations, cash flows and financial position; however, the continuedextent of the impact will vary depending on the duration and severity of theeconomic and operational impacts of COVID-19.

We took steps to protect the safety of our employees, with a large majority ofour worldwide workforce working from home, while developing creative ideas toprotect the health and well-being of our communities and setting up our peopleto help them do their best work for our clients while working remotely. Withrespect to managing costs, we have implemented multiple initiatives to align ourexpenses with changes in revenue. The steps taken across our agencies andcorporate group include deferred merit increases, freezes on hiring andtemporary labor, major cuts in non-essential spending, staff reductions,furloughs in markets where that option is available and salary reductions,including voluntary salary deferment for our senior corporate management team.In addition, we remain committed to and have intensified our efforts around cashflow discipline, including the identification of significant capitalexpenditures that can be deferred, and working capital management. We began tosee the effects of COVID-19 on client spending, notably in the UK and US marketswith our Mission subsidiaries throughout the second quarter of calendar 2020with much of the work force of the UK subsidiary on furlough, and with ourTroika Design subsidiary furloughed as March 2020 progressed. Due to mandatorystay at home orders and social distancing, our experiential business has beenparticularly impacted by COVID-19. Promotional and experiential events with theCompany's assistance are particularly susceptible to external factors weredelayed by many of the Company's Mission clients due to the effects of COVID-19.The Company had temporarily furloughed employees to reflect current reduceddemands associated with those client sets. However, as of the first and secondquarters of calendar 2021, we started to see business dramatically improve andexpect greater improvement in our results in our next fiscal quarters. As citieshave commenced openings with the improvement of vaccines distribution andinfection rates declining, our client activities have doubled and there is areal optimism that the economic conditions are improving. Sports, Entertainment,Pharma clients are contracting our services across all entities at rates similarto 2019.

In the current environment, a major priority for us is preserving liquidity. Ourprimary liquidity sources are operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents andshort-term investments. Although we expect to experience a decrease in our cashflow from operations as a result of the impact of COVID-19, we have obtainedrelief under the CARES Act in the form of a Small Business Administration backedloans. In aggregate we received $1.7 million in SBA stimulus "Payroll ProtectionProgram" funding in April 2020 of which the majority of these funds were usedfor payroll. As per the US Government rules, the funds used for payroll,healthcare benefits, and other applicable operating expenses can be forgiven andthe Company reported them as such in December 2020 considering the Companybelieves we have substantially met these conditions. On August 14, 2020, theCompany received an additional $500,000 in loans with 30 year terms under theSBA's "Economic Injury Disaster Loan" program which the Company intends to useto address any cash shortfalls that may result from the current pandemic. InFebruary 2021, the Company obtained additional relief under the CARES Act in theform of a Small Business Administration backed loans and received an additional$1.7 million in SBA stimulus "Payroll Protection Program" funds which will beused for payroll, healthcare benefits, and other applicable operating expenses.In July 2021, the Company was notified that all of the stimulus funds wereforgiven with the exception of approximately $8,000 which was returned in thethree months ending September 30, 2021.

In the United Kingdom, as of April 1, 2020, Mission furloughed twenty-sevenemployees, saving 78,000 in April payroll, being made up of 55,000 of furloughmonies from the government and 16,000 in associated payroll savings and appliedfor a 3-month rent holiday. In May 1, 2020, Mission put on furlough anadditional 5 employees bringing the total to 32, alongside a 10% pay cut for allemployees not furloughed, saving 111,000 in May payroll, being made up of62,000 of furlough monies from the government, 33,000 of associated payrollsavings and 16,000 in savings related to the pay cut. On April 1, 2020, TroikaDesign Group actioned a 15% salary reduction across the majority of the LosAngeles staff and furloughed one office manager for a total savings of $112,000per month. Finally, certain members of the Company's executive team deferredcompensation temporarily. In August 2020, the Company received 50,000 in loansrelated to the COVID pandemic with an interest rate of 2.5% to be paid over fiveyears beginning one year after receipt. The Company used these proceeds toaddress any cash shortfalls that resulted from the pandemic.

The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak continues to impact the Company'sresults will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannotbe predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severityof the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

For the three months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020.

Our revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 were$8,349,000 and $4,132,000, respectively, an increase of approximately $4,217,000or 102.1%. The driver of this increase is a resurgence of business at TroikaDesign and the UK subsidiary of Mission-Media Holdings which recognizedincreases of $2,575,000 (113.2%) and $1,440,000 (173.6%), respectively, inrevenue in relation to the prior period which was significantly impacted by theCOVID pandemic.

The costs of revenue exclusive of operating expenses for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2021 and 2020 were $4,837,000 and $2,280,000, respectively, anincrease of $2,557,000, or 112.1%. The increase is directly correlated to theaforementioned increase in revenue at Troika Design and the UK subsidiary ofMission-Media Holdings as result of these business units beginning theirrecovery from the COVID pandemic and the gradual return of live-events. Thegross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020decreased from 44.8% to 42.1% due to a higher proportion of consulting feesbeing generated in the prior period which have a higher gross profit margin incomparison to revenue generated from project-based and live-event business.

The operating costs for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 were$7,005,000 and $5,809,000 respectively, an increase of $1,196,000 or 20.6%. Theprimary driver of this increase was $857,000 in additional salary cost andpayroll taxes primarily due to the Redeeem acquisition and the return offurloughed employees, $659,000 increase in stock-based compensation, due to theRedeeem acquisition, and a $373,000 increase in board of director fees. Thiswas offset by a $436,000 decrease in rental expense and $268,000 reduction inlegal fees.

As a result of the foregoing, our net loss for the three months ended September30, 2021 decreased to $2,139,000 from $3,921,000 for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2020.

As of September 30, 2021, compared with June 30, 2021:

As of September 30, 2021, the Company has a working capital deficit of$(5,279,000) compared with a deficit of $(4,004,000) at June 30, 2021. Theincrease in working capital deficit was primarily the result of a net loss of$2,139,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021. The increase inworking capital deficit also reflects a decrease of $2,314,000 in cash and anincrease of $900,000 in contract liabilities offset by a decrease of $967,000 inaccounts payable and accrued expenses and an increase of $649,000 in accountsreceivable.

As of September 30, 2021, compared with September 30, 2020:

Net cash used in operating activities increased by $1,079,000 from $(1,182,000)to $(2,261,000) for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2021,respectively. The increase was the result of an increase of $2,999,000 in cashused relating to accounts payable and accrued expenses, $368,000 reduction inthe amortization of intangibles, and $399,000 increase in contract liabilitiesto government grants. This was offset by a $1,782,000 decrease in net loss,$805,000 increase in stock-based compensation relating to the Redeeemacquisition, $989,000 increase in contract liabilities relating to revenue.

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $61,000 as a result ofcapital expenditures being increased to $68,000 from $7,000 for the three monthsended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $735,000 from $715,000 to$(20,000) for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively.The decrease was the result of a $565,000 decrease in proceeds from stimulusloan programs and a $150,000 decrease in proceeds from convertible notepayables.

During the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company did notrecognize any proceeds from the sale of its securities.

As a result of the forgoing, the Company had a decrease in cash of $2,314,000for the three months ended September 30, 2021 in comparison to a decrease of$483,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2020.

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings BeforeInterest Taxes Depreciation & Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") to Net Income(Loss):

Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adj.EBITDA"):

The adjusted EBITDA metric is most helpful when used in determining the valueof a company for transactions such as mergers, acquisitions or raising capital.

The adjustments made to a company's EBITDA can vary quite a bit from one companyto the next, but the goal is the same. Adjusting the EBITDA metric aims to"normalize" the figure so that it is somewhat generic, meaning it containsessentially the same line-item expenses that any other, similar company in itsindustry would contain.

We believe that our financial statements and the other financial data included,have been prepared in a manner that complies, in all material respects, withgenerally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). However,for the reasons discussed below, we have presented certain non-GAAP measuresherein.

We have presented the following non-GAAP measures to assist investors inunderstanding our core net operating results on an on-going basis: (i) AdjustedEBITDA as it relates to Net Income. These non-GAAP financial measures may alsoassist investors, securities analysts and others in making comparisons of ourcore operating results with those of other companies and making informedbusiness decisions.

As used herein, net income represents net loss plus depreciation andamortization, interest expense, net and income tax expense. As used herein,Adjusted EBITDA represents Net Income plus the following add backs;

Net Income plus unrealized gains, depreciation and amortization, interestexpense, non-operating related management bonus compensation, foreign exchangelosses, stock-based compensation expense and litigation expenses.

We recognize that Adjusted EBITDA off net income, have limitations as analyticalfinancial measures. For example, neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA reflects:

Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash expense for stock-basedcompensation, which is currently and is expected to remain a key element of ouroverall long-term incentive compensation package.

The bulk of the adjustments are often different types of expenses that are addedback to EBITDA. The resulting adjusted EBITDA often reflects a higher earningslevel because of the reduced expenses.

EBITDA Adjustments included below:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Edgar Online, source Glimpses

Read more:
TROIKA MEDIA GROUP, INC. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (form 10-Q) - marketscreener.com

A tipping point: how poor forestry fuels floods and fires in western Canada – The Guardian

A devastating string of floods and landslides have shocked residents in British Columbia, a west Canadian province increasingly forced to grapple with the effects of the climate crisis. As images of the devastation circulate on social media, experts warn that management of the provinces forests will be critical to blunting the effects of future storms.

Its just this awful feeling of being right and not wanting to be right. This is exactly what the best available science has predicted for years, said Peter Wood, author of a recent report on the link between clearcut logging and community safety from the Sierra Club BC. We know the outcome when you log steep slopes You reach sort of a tipping point, where the forest is no longer able to provide that moderating service of controlling flow of water.

On Tuesday, more residents were forced to flee their homes amid intermittent landslides and rising water levels. Videos from aerial flyovers showed parts of Abbotsford inundated with flood waters. Further north, a section of the Coquihalla highway, one of the provinces main road systems, appeared to have been severed.

Officials said it could be months before one of the provinces busiest highways reopens fully, after sections were destroyed. Rescue teams also began the search for people whose cars may have been buried after a series of mudslides trapped vehicles travelling east of Vancouver.

Experts have long cautioned that clearcut logging affects slope stability, the rate at which water is absorbed into the ground and the ability to hold soil in root systems. Without trees, heavy rains can wash large amounts of sediment into nearby water systems, choking creeks and streams and causing them to quickly overflow.

Over the last couple days, Ive been looking at the areas that have been particularly hard hit, and it happens to coincide with some of the communities that have been logged the heaviest, said Wood. A lot of that is due to the mountain pine beetle, but nonetheless, the cutting really does affect the amount of water that flows overland.

At the same time, British Columbia has suffered some of its worst wildfire seasons in recent years. As the aftermath of the storm became clear, a number of the areas worst hit were also near blazes that tore through the province earlier in the summer.

Theres a very clear link between a wildfire happening and the risk of a landslide or debris flow, said Thomas Martin, a forester in the province. If you burn a lot of the trees, grass and shrubs, there are fewer living things to intercept the water. It just flows directly off the hill. And fires can make the soil hydrophobic so the runoff increases even more.

The problem for the province isnt just that fires are getting larger theyre also getting more severe and are burning at higher temperatures.

Martin says forest ecologists have long recommended controlled burns as well as selective logging to thin the forests, allowing larger mature trees to thrive and improving protection against wildfires.

But there does not seem to be a political will to do what is required. Were talking about a large-scale look at the landscape, and how can we adapt our forests to climate change.

While forest fires have long been seen as a summer event, the recent flooding has highlighted how interconnected the issues are.

You have all these indirect effects on the landscape. Landslides have now taken out two major highways. The entire town of Merritt has been flooded, lost its drinking water and been evacuated, he said. Would I have predicted that both our key highways would get absolutely destroyed in this event? No. But was I surprised that it seems like both of these watershed events occurred in wildfires? No.

This article was amended on 17 November 2021, to insert the word fully in this information about the Coquihalla highway: it could be months before one of the provinces busiest highways reopens fully.

View original post here:
A tipping point: how poor forestry fuels floods and fires in western Canada - The Guardian

The Federalist Society loses its mind over woke corporations – Vox

Massive corporations are pursuing a common and mutually agreed upon agenda to destroy American freedom, attorney Ashley Keller told a gathering of the most powerful legal organization in America last Saturday.

This conspiracy, Keller claimed, includes companies as varied as Facebook, Google, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Twitter, and Walmart, all of which have joined forces with the swelling ranks of so-called woke people, who are completely and unabashedly opposed to individual rights.

Defenders of freedom must face reality, Keller insisted, before adding the nations top advocacy group for big business to his list of enemies. The Chamber of Commerce is not our friend. The C-suite grandees who finance it are not our friends either. They were erstwhile allies of convenience and they are now the enemies of a freedom-loving people.

Its the sort of conspiratorial thinking one might expect to hear on the Alex Jones Show, or perhaps from disciples of QAnon. But Mr. Kellers audience was not an ordinary online crowd.

Keller is a Harvard graduate who clerked on the Supreme Court of the United States, and his audience was the Federalist Society, an organization whose members dominate the federal judiciary and especially the nations highest court. He spoke to a conference packed with some of the most influential lawyers and judges in the country the conferences speaker list includes more than two dozen sitting federal appellate judges, and I spotted numerous other judges just wandering the conventions halls.

When someone speaks at the Federalist Societys annual gathering, they speak directly to many of the most powerful people in the country, some of whom literally have the power to order the Societys enemies to comply with its wishes.

And while those wishes arent clearly defined yet, the enemy increasingly is. Over the three-day span of the Federalist Societys annual convention, attendees were warned of unprecedented threats to human flourishing, all driven by cultural leftists who have taken over public and private schools, universities, and even big business in order to impose their woke agenda on an unwilling public.

Even the theme of the conference Public and Private Power: Preserving Freedom or Preventing Harm? hinted that something has gone horribly wrong in the private sector.

Never before in nearly half a century, have we seen all levels of government so blatantly disregarding the Constitution and our civil rights laws, and at such a furious pace, said Kimberly Hermann, a lawyer who sues public schools on behalf of conservative causes, at a panel denouncing diversity, equity, and inclusion-based curricula.

Vivek Ramaswamy, a young biotech executive and author of Woke, Inc.: Inside Corporate Americas Social Justice Scam, claimed that the woke movement in the United States, and corporations that appeal to it, undermine Americas geopolitical standing against China.

Adam Candeub, a professor at Michigan State University College of Law, complained about Facebook and Twitters controversial decision to suppress content about a dubiously sourced story about President Joe Bidens son Hunter. Less convincingly, he complained about several big tech companies decision to temporarily block the conservative social media site Parler after January 6. As Amazon explained after it removed Parler from its web hosting service, it did so because the conservative social media site refused to pull down content that threatens the public safety, such as by inciting and planning the rape, torture, and assassination of named public officials and private citizens.

And yet, for Candeub, these incidents were proof that all conservatives are threatened and something needed to be done to rein in tech companies. If trends continue, Candeub told the Federalist Society audience, youll be de-platformed.

Its a stunning rhetorical shift from a fanatically pro-free market organization thats traditionally pushed a hands-off approach to business. Historically, the society has sought to undermine corporate regulation, and that has lionized decisions like Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which permits corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections. The Federalist Societys conference typically features panels warning about systematic regulatory overreach against regulated industries.

But now the society appears to have lost confidence in the very free market system it spent decades celebrating.

In a market society, economists Milton and Rose Friedman wrote in 1979, the consumer is protected from being exploited by one seller by the existence of another seller from whom he can buy and who is eager to sell to him. In theory, if one company adopts woke branding that offends its customers, then the market will deliver those customers into the waiting arms of a competitor.

Yet, rather than waiting for the hand of the market to deliver an invisible spanking to woke corporations, speaker after speaker at the Federalist Societys convention called for a central planner to intervene. As it turns out, the societys commitment to something as foundational as free market capitalism may be secondary to its desire to own the libs.

The conference featured an array of angry speakers raging against private sector leftism, but it was often hard to figure out what, exactly, they were so mad about. Though a mix of panels on woke corporations, universities, and secondary schools warned of a multi-institutional effort to impose this ideology on the nation, many speakers never explained what they think this ideology entails. Those that did often described a woke person in caricatured terms.

Newsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer defined the enemy and he very pointedly used the word enemy as the Ibram X. Kendi woke ideology extremists who are trying to poison and rot the minds of our children into hating themselves and hating their country to boot. Keller claimed that woketarians dont just oppose individual rights, they also believe that Americas founding was an immoral act and that the Bill of Rights is racist.

Numerous speakers deployed the most potent weapon in the anti-woke advocates toolbox: the unrepresentative anecdote. Three speakers pointed to the same two incidents the Hunter Biden article and the moves against Parler as evidence that big tech is out of control. Speakers on three different panels complained about an incident where a Yale Law School student and Federalist Society member felt intimidated after a mid-level administrator pressured him to apologize for an email advertising a Trap House party where Popeyes chicken and basic bitch American-themed snacks would be served.

Even when a speaker pointed to a specific incident that involved neither Yale nor Hunter Biden, moreover, they gave little reason to believe that any systemic problems exist.

Hermann, for example, alleged that a school district in Illinois separated white and non-white teachers and gave them different teacher trainings. She also complained about a childrens book likening white privilege to a deal with the Devil a book that has allegedly been taught in maybe a dozen classrooms and recommended to students in a few more. Yet, when she tried to show that these incidents were part of a broader pattern, her best evidence was that every single school district throughout this country is requiring teachers to take some sort of equity training.

Ramaswamy, the Woke, Inc. author, even implied that laws banning discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, and national origin should be repealed. Not many people are willing to revisit the question of whether the law should protect classes such as these, Ramaswamy said, but I am.

The conference, in other words, featured an array of speakers who created a general sense that values like diversity and inclusion have gone too far including several who seemed to reject the very idea that these values are worth championing at all. But it was often hard to pin down exactly what wokism is, or what the Federalist Society plans to do about it.

That said, many speakers brought up Milton Friedman, and specifically his views about the role of a corporation. Under the Friedman Doctrine, a corporate manager is the agent of the individuals who own the corporation, and thus must act in their interests a duty that many speakers claimed was inconsistent with corporations playing politics. Ramaswamy, for example, warned against the woke executive who uses his or her seat of corporate power, and the shareholder resources associated with it, to advance a particular agenda.

Its doubtful that the Federalist Society really wants to follow this argument to its logical conclusion. No speaker that I witnessed argued that corporations should be barred from lobbying law and policymakers. And the few speakers who mentioned Citizens United appeared to believe that it was correctly decided. For years, the Federalist Society elevated voices who believe that corporations should be free to spend money to elect Republicans or to lobby Congress to diminish the power of the EPA. And there is no reason to think that it will reverse course on these issues.

But so many speakers at this years conference appeared convinced that certain choices corporations have made present such a unique threat that the ordinary rules of free speech should not apply. The undergirding principle behind so many of these speeches was that corporate free speech and corporations ability to shape their own companies values does not extend to actions that promote whatever the Federalist Society means when it uses the word woke.

But even if we grant the premise that a corporation that promotes values like diversity is different in kind from a corporation that gives a million dollars to a Republican super PAC, its not even clear why corporate diversity initiatives and the like run counter to Friedmans theory of the corporation. Theres a perfectly plausible argument that when corporate executives make a woke comment, decline to provide services to a website that promotes political violence, or run an ad campaign featuring BLM supporters, theyre just exercising good business judgment.

The Societys rage against woke corporations only makes sense if you imagine wokeism to exclude any real concept of social and economic justice. Amazons decision to block a single extremist website does nothing to allay the harsh working conditions in its warehouses. Corporate America is replete with companies that denounce a regressive bill in public then donate to conservative groups that help reelect these lawmakers in private.

As the Roosevelt Institutes Kitty Richards told my colleague Emily Stewart, We should be skeptical of individual companies and their CEOs and shareholders talking about corporate tax rates or specific provisions that seem benevolent, because they are often trying to shape policy in a way that will affect their bottom lines positively.

But lets take the arguments against woke capital offered by people like Keller and Ramaswamy at face value. Yes, corporations have always advocated for their own interests in the political arena, and this corporate speech often promotes the laissez-faire values that used to animate the Federalist Society. But there are, at the very least, anecdotal examples of big companies taking actions that enrage conservatives and delight liberals and Democrats.

The assumption underlying so many of the Federalist Society speakers remarks is that, when companies hold diversity trainings or deny server space to websites like Parler, they are advancing the political views of corporate executives at the expense of the company itself. In Kellers words, woke capitalism is driven by CEOs who like the psychic income they get from virtue signaling, and who think that appealing to cultural leftists will appeal to all of the people who go to cocktail parties that New York Times folks like to go to.

Perhaps. But if companies as diverse as Google, Coca-Cola, JPMorgan, and Walmart are all engaged in the kind of wokism Keller despises, he should at least consider the possibility that they are doing so because it is good business.

The business case for wokism starts by looking at the political divide between younger and older voters. According to the Pew Research Center, President Joe Biden beat former President Donald Trump by 30 points among voters between the ages of 18 and 29. He won voters aged 30 to 49 by 11 points. Trump, meanwhile, won voters aged 50 and older.

This divide matters to corporate executives because young people wield a disproportionate influence over the market. As Ezra Klein has noted, advertisers are particularly interested in reaching the younger, Biden-supporting cohort of consumers because those younger consumers tend to have unsettled brand preferences. If you convince a young 30-something to buy a Ford truck, theres a good chance they will drive Ford trucks for the rest of their lives.

This focus on young consumers has several implications. For one thing, it means that television studios will tend to produce content that appeals to the younger, more liberal audience that advertisers want to reach thus causing Americas pop culture to embrace young peoples values. It also means that companies will try to market their products to people who share these values, even if such a campaign might alienate older consumers.

Consider, for example, Nikes decision to make Colin Kaepernick, the former NFL player and racial justice activist, the centerpiece of a 2018 ad campaign. This campaign mystified many older consumers an SSRS poll from that year found that just 26 percent of adults over 65 agreed with Nikes decision to feature Kaepernick.

But Nike also knew that two-thirds of the companys customers are under 35, according to a report by CNN, and a plurality of this age cohort supported Nikes decision to feature Kaepernick. The views of older voters didnt matter to Nike. From a purely capitalist perspective, woke branding helped Nike sell shoes.

Young people also care a great deal about diverse workplaces. A 2018 survey by the consulting firm Deloitte, for example, found that millennial and Gen Z employees working for employers perceived to have a diverse workforce are more likely to want to stay five or more years than those who say their companies are not diverse (69 percent to 27 percent). The same survey found that younger workers are more likely to remain at a company with a diverse management team.

So companies that want to attract new consumers and recruit a talented workforce must appeal to younger individuals who largely reject the Federalist Societys values. That may lead to a number of corporate policies that offend people like Keller or Ramaswamy. And it may mean that companies like Google or Amazon risk an uprising among their software engineers if those companies get in bed with a site like Parler. But its hardly evidence that corporate executives are engaged in a conspiracy to promote wokism at the expense of their shareholders.

Even if business leaders are wrong that appealing to young, left-leaning consumers is a good business plan, moreover, sanctioning these companies for doing so could require upending one of the most foundational principles of corporate law. Although corporate law typically does allow shareholders to sue the directors of a corporation if the shareholder believes that they are behaving counter to the corporations interests, corporate leaders benefit from something known as the business judgment rule, which ordinarily protects business-related decisions that are made in good faith.

The law, in other words, is built on the premise that companies should be free to experiment with business tactics that may annoy some individuals, and the proper remedy if a company makes bad business decisions is that it will lose consumers to its competitors. Let the market work, rather than turning businesses over to a central planner.

Although conservative rage against corporate wokeness was a centerpiece of the Federalist Societys gathering, its unclear what exactly the various speakers plan to do about it. Several speakers offered policy proposals, but there was no consensus around a single idea.

Although several speakers expressed skepticism about efforts to foster racial diversity, some of them supported policies to promote what Northwestern law professor John McGinnis referred to as intellectual diversity that is, policies encouraging institutions to hire political conservatives. That could mean affirmative action programs for conservatives, or something more akin to an anti-discrimination law protecting people with conservative views.

Several speakers at a panel on Private Control Over Public Discussion pointed to an opinion last April by Justice Clarence Thomas, which argued that social media websites should be treated as common carriers and subjected to special regulations, including a general requirement to serve all comers a standard that would require Twitter and Facebook to restore former President Donald Trumps accounts and that could potentially prevent these sites from refusing to link to disinformation or hate speech.

Randy Barnett, a Georgetown law professor, offered a slightly different solution: Strip many social media companies of their ability to curate most of their own content, and require them to adhere to the same rules that apply to government censorship. Under this approach, Twitter or Facebook could still remove fraud, incitement to imminent lawlessness, personal threats of violence, or other unlawful harassment, obscenity, or child pornography, but would be unable to remove hate speech. Or speech that induces people to commit a crime such as invading the United States Capitol, so long as the crime is not imminent.

At least one speaker suggested that lawmakers should rely on sanctions and menace to cow woke institutions into compliance. Hammer, the Newsweek editor, insisted that conservatives need to wield in state legislative chambers some degree of power to punish our enemies within the confines of the rule of law.

In any event, the Societys members appear to be in an early stage of brainstorming how to target woke institutions and remake them in a more conservative image. Its not yet clear which specific policies will emerge from this process or which ones will become law.

But thats no reason for anyone who fears such an agenda to remain complacent.

At the Federalist Societys 2015 convention, the speakers offered a similarly disjointed array of proposals to limit the power of federal agencies such as the Department of Labor or the Environmental Protection Agency. Though none of these proposals emerged as the Societys consensus view in 2015, the Federalist Societys views on agency power shaped the Trump White Houses decisions regarding who to appoint to the federal bench. By 2019, five members of the Supreme Court a majority had signed onto a doctrine known as nondelegation which could give the conservative Court a veto power over any regulation handed down by a federal agency.

And then, just this month, the Supreme Court announced it would hear a case that is likely to implement this nondelegation doctrine and that could gut the EPAs authority in the process.

When the Federalist Society identifies an enemy, in other words, it is very good at convincing its judges to target that same enemy. And those judges now control the Supreme Court.

See the original post:
The Federalist Society loses its mind over woke corporations - Vox