Mediaboss Marketing

All season long, the Toronto Maple Leafs young stars Auston Matthews (23-years-old) and Mitch Marner (24-years-old) led their team in scoring. They also placed well across the entire NHL. Matthews was the Rocket Richard Trophy winner with 41 goals scored and tied for fifth in NHL scoring. Marner was fourth in NHL scoring. Recently, Matthews was nominated for the Ted Lindsay Award as the NHLs best player.

In headline should read something like Matthews and Marner Have Magnificant Seasons. And that would have been the narrative had the team put together any kind of playoff success. But, the Maple Leafs as a team went down yet again, falling out of Stanley Cup contention by being dumped during the first round by the Montreal Canadiens.

It also didnt help that neither Matthews nor Marner were able to keep up their regular-season prowess. Both first-line partners scored a little basically one or two games, but they couldnt sustain the pace they had built during the regular season.

Related: Maple Leafs News: Grading Playoff Production, Whose Play Didnt Cut It?

The way their first line is built, Matthews and Marner are a partnership. They feed off each other. They have great chemistry. When one doesnt score its also likely the others offense also dries up. In contrast, when one line-mate flourishes the other usually does as well.

This time it worked the other way. Marner kept feeding Matthews pucks, and Carey Price kept shutting the door. The fact that Marner doesnt have the best shot didnt help. By the end of Game 7, Marner hadnt scored in 18th consecutive playoff games.

On June 2, Matthews was interviewed about a number of topics including his own and Marners lack of playoff production. I cant imagine that these are kind of interviews that any NHL player engages happily. Youve just failed to win; in fact, you blew a 3-1 game series lead. What youve worked for all season is now toast. You feel bad anyway, now you have to in and get to speak about it on a video that everyone can see.

The context of those interviews hurts if youre a player. You just got dumped; and, now you have to suffer public scolding from people who personally feel that youve let them down. Cant be fun for these players. I know Id dread that and it makes me glad I was a professor.

During that interview, Matthews answered appropriately and said appropriate things. He never once fell into returning fire. He kept his calm well, mostly. During the short video clip of the interview, you can see his responses.

Matthews was asked to comment about the redundant suggestions some people are making that the big four on offence may need to be split up. Then the media questioner named Matthews first-line partner Marner in two potential ways. First, might Marner be involved in a possible trade? Second, should he be moved away from Matthews so that the teams top six might achieve a better balance based on what happened again this year?

Related: Darryl Sittler Toronto Maple Leafs Legend

Matthews answer was revealing.

First, he quickly dismissed the validity of the entire idea by suggesting, I dont make much of that to be honest.

Second, he used the opportunity to stick up for his first-line partner by saying Mitch is an unbelievable player and an unbelievable teammate.

Third, he clearly demarcated who the questioner was and who he was talking with. In doing so, Matthews constructed the narrative of an in and an out. That is, he positioned the questioner (and others) as outside. And, he positioned Matthews, Marner, his teammates, and the organization as inside.

Matthews did it all thoughtfully, carefully, graciously, and without any sense of obvious irritability. But to me, his answer was immediately revealing. In it, Matthews shared a great deal of information about how the team was proceeding to delineate where they (re)sided in response to whats by reputation known to be a difficult and critical fanbase and media.

Matthews said, Thats just you know something I dont think anybody really thinks about here or focuses on. (my highlight of here)

Related: Maple Leafs Should Look to Address Killer Instinct in Free Agency

Matthews then added, I know in this room you know everybody loves Mitch and everybody loves everybody in this room. He went on to add that We really have a tight bond. (again, my highlight of in this room)

Then, Matthews put the writer in his place and I dont mean in any way rudely, but also matter-of-factly. Matthews added, So, I think all the stuff on the outside noise coming from the outside its you guys. (again, my highlights of noise, which is defined as sound that makes no recognizable sense, and outside and you guys.)

Finally, and perhaps the most telling was Matthews last response to the questioner Have fun with that. Could it be that Matthews and his teammates believe that outsiders are actually having fun as a result of his teams disappointment? He clearly said that these are men he loves. Thats tough stuff!

To me, this short video at least suggests theres a present and perhaps growing narrative among the Maple Leafs players that they are not supported by the fans or the media. In fact, are they alone?

Might there also a narrative being constructed that this 2020-21 disappointment has become a situation where the players feel that those on the outside might actually be enjoying as Matthews said having fun with the players disappointment and lack of success? Are outsiders abusing the people they love (love is Matthews word, not mine)?

To me, a discourse analysis of this one short video suggests that Matthews the Maple Leafs brightest young star is feeling theres an inside/outside split between the team (inside) and the media and the fans (outside). If thats true, where do the players, the team, the media, and the fans go from here?

Related:Maple Leafs Jack Campbell Is a Teammate You Want on the Roster

Furthermore, thinking well down the road, if this narrative takes hold and grows a life of its own, how might these little encounters and the narrative created by them impact the players desire to remain in Toronto?

But this is temporary right? Theyll get over it right? Well, if youve ever had relationships with other people, as Matthews says Have fun with that.

The Old Prof (Jim Parsons, Sr.) taught for more than 40 years in the Faculty of Education at the University of Alberta. Hes a Canadian boy, who has two degrees from the University of Kentucky and a doctorate from the University of Texas. He is now retired on Vancouver Island, where he lives with his family. His hobbies include playing with his hockey cards and simply being a sports fan hockey, the Toronto Raptors, and CFL football (thinks Ricky Ray personifies how a professional athlete should act).

If you wonder why he doesnt use his real name, its because his son whos also Jim Parsons wrote for The Hockey Writers first and asked Jim Sr. to use another name so readers wouldnt confuse their work.

Because Jim Sr. had worked in China, he adopted the Mandarin word for teacher (). The first character lo () means old, and the second character sh () means teacher. The literal translation of losh is old teacher. That became his pen name. Today, other than writing for The Hockey Writers, he teaches graduate students research design at several Canadian universities.

He looks forward to sharing his insights about the Toronto Maple Leafs and about how sports engages life more fully. His Twitter address is https://twitter.com/TheOldProf

Read the original:
Maple Leafs and the Media: Trying to Control the Narrative - The Hockey Writers

Not a great week for journalism at the ABC, News Corps Sharri Markson tweeted on Monday, when the week was barely a day old.

It is hard to remember the last time a News Corp columnist declared it was a great week for journalism at the ABC. Marksons tweet linked to a story in The Australian that quoted former Attorney-General Christian Porter saying his dropping of his defamation claim against the ABC was a humiliating backdown by the ABC.

Apart from reporting the settlement, the main basis for the article was that the ABC had warned its staff not to claim victory following Porters withdrawal, and to be careful in the way they talked about it.

At such a legally sensitive moment, one might have thought the ABC warning to staff was mere prudence, but it also points to more recurring issues about how media organisations view their journalists statements on social media. These issues are likely to become more common, not less.

Read more: View from The Hill: Porter decides it's time to 'fold em' in ABC defamation case

Last weekend, the Sydney Morning Herald published a story quoting Liberal Senator and former ABC journalist Sarah Henderson saying the national broadcasters social media policy was woefully inadequate.

There are genuine dilemmas here. Journalists as professionals and employees are subject to certain disciplines. What they tweet can and will affect the way others perceive their work.

Conversely, as citizens, they also have the right to free expression.

In April, The Australians economics editor, Adam Creighton, sent this tweet:

Does such a cri de coeur affect how readers regard his judgement and capacity to report? Or should he have the right to say how he feels?

The ABC is the Australian media organisation that has most earnestly sought to resolve these dilemmas. It has four eminently sensible guidelines:

do not mix the professional and the personal in ways likely to bring the ABC into disrepute

do not undermine your effectiveness at work

do not imply ABC endorsement of your personal views

do not disclose confidential information obtained through work.

Henderson pointed to two breaches of these guidelines. One was from an ABC lawyer who called the Coalition government fascist and Prime Minister Scott Morrison an awful human being on Twitter, and then resigned. Henderson said he should not have been allowed to resign, but should have been fired.

Her other example involved what she called Laura Tingles trolling of a prime minister last year. This is an inaccurate use of the word trolling, but increasingly politicians (and journalists) seem to equate any criticism of themselves on social media as trolling.

Tingles single offending tweet concluded we grieve the loss of so many of our fine colleagues to government ideological bastardry. Hope you are feeling smug Scott Morrison. The tweet was posted late at night after a farewell function for her friend and colleague Philippa McDonald, and it was deleted the next morning.

Read more: Latest $84 million cuts rip the heart out of the ABC, and our democracy

It is asking a lot of ABC journalists to feel detached and impartial about government cutbacks to their own organisation that adversely affect the careers of their colleagues. Nevertheless, the ABC has a large investment in Tingles public credibility, and the tweet was immediately addressed internally.

ABC Managing Director David Anderson injected an unusual note of common sense when he was asked whether Tingle was reprimanded during a Senate estimates hearing. He called Tingles tweet an error of judgement and said theres a proportionality that needs to be applied.

The larger danger is that journalists, especially those at the ABC, will get caught up in public controversies surrounding their own work. While at one level they clearly should have the right to defend themselves, the problem is the temptation to succumb to the cheap point-scoring in which critics often engage, to be dragged down from the professional standards of the original program.

Though recent public controversies have focused on apparent breaches on social media not being sufficiently punished, there are also dangers and potential injustices in an unduly restrictive approach.

The most obvious victim of a journalist being punished for social media activity was SBS football commentator Scott McIntyre, who posted a series of tweets on ANZAC Day in 2015 about the cultification of an imperialist invasion.

Read more: Conspiracy theories on the right, cancel culture on the left: how political legitimacy came under threat in 2020

Then-Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull thought they were despicable remarks which deserve to be condemned, and contacted the head of SBS, Michael Ebeid. Ebeid fired McIntyre the same day.

Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson was then quoted as saying McIntyres freedom of speech was not being curtailed, and that his historical claims will be judged very harshly.

Whatever the merits of his ANZAC tweets, they had no relationship to his role as a football commentator. Is his reporting on soccer compromised by his views on the ANZAC tradition?

This episode illustrates that political correctness and cancel culture are found across the political spectrum and media organisations will continue to grapple with these issues as the social media profiles of their journalists continue to grow.

Follow this link:
Journalists are not going to stop tweeting. But should media outlets exert more control over their posts? - The Conversation AU

Yet another attempt to bring all mediums of speech in Pakistan under state control has come to the fore, as the countrys Federal Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has issued a draft ordinance titled the Pakistan Media Development Authority. It is important to analyse the ordinance based on its content, as well as the intent of the state based on recent attempts to control speech and press in the country.

The proposed body is to regulate print, television, electronic and digital media, altogether by merging all different regulators into one, supposedly to save money and streamline authority, is essentially a euphemism for easing the burden of unconstitutional censorship that the state has taken upon itself. The proposal itself states that media in democracy ideally should be self-regulatory [sic], but proposes government regulation through a sweeping statement that demerits outweigh the merits for a self-regulation mechanism for all forms of media in Pakistan.

The draft from Pakistans information ministry openly admits that controlling government advertisement expenditure as an incentive structure exists for the countrys government to solicit favourable coverage from media houses and punish critical coverage, as has been seen in the past few years.

This needs to change if Pakistan is to be a rights-respecting democracy. Government advertisements in the media should only worry about reaching citizens through print, broadcast and digital media rather than acting like a private empire that aligns expenditure on the basis of favourable words when the job of the media is to hold the government accountable.

A major concern with the Pakistan Media Development Authority is the attempt to lump social media together with other forms of media without realising the fundamentally different nature of the internet.

Whereas the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016, has been consistently abused to silence activists and journalists, the Pakistan Media Development Authority proposal claims that in the age of mega data and social media regulatory functions are only limited to criminal acts of cybercrimes and Federal Investigation Agency holds the mandate to investigate and prosecute cybercrimes.

This completely ignores the abuse of Section 37 of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act by the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority to censor entire platforms like TikTok twice in the past year, apart from the record-breaking number of requests sent to social media companies for the content takedown and user data, a large portion of which were complied with by companies.

But the Pakistan Media Development Authority seems to want to further expand censorship powers over social media, a proposal which is neither permissible under the Constitution, nor practically possible, as the Pakistan Media Development Authority proposal itself states that the regulatory access of government is increasingly getting marginalised due to rapidly advancing internet-based technologies.

The chief justice of the Islamabad High Court has termed the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content Rules, 2020, under Section 37 of Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act prima facie ultra vires to Article 19 of the Pakistan Constitution and the government is currently reviewing them for the second time. Clearly, the attempts to regulate social media in the status quo are already excessive.

Pakistan seems to have dropped any pretence of adhering to democratic and constitutional norms and procedures. The proposal termed as an attempt to impose media martial law by the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, Pakistan Bar Association and Human Rights Commission of Pakistan is being introduced as an ordinance bypassing democratic processes of being tabled in parliament and debated upon on the floor of the house as well as in standing committees.

It is also telling that this draft sprung up all of a sudden in the public domain with the intent of passing it, whereas the Journalist Protection Bill was passed by the cabinet after two years of struggle by Pakistans human rights ministry and is being introduced in the countrys parliament. Clearly, attempts to control the press triumph over attempts to protect the press in Pakistan.

This comes in the background of journalist Asad Toor being brazenly attacked inside his home in the capital with the attackers least concerned about being caught on CCTV, Fareed Khan, a photographer being illegally detained by police for photographing the lockdown in Karachi and a private television team similarly manhandled while filming violation of Covid-19-related standard operating procedures. Not to forget the armed attack on journalist Absar Alam in Islamabad a month prior to these attacks.

It is also noteworthy to recall proposals similar to the Pakistan Media Development Authoritys by this government in the past. In 2018, the same information minister had floated the idea of a Pakistan Media Regulatory Authority that would merge the electronic, print and digital media regulators. Similarly, in early 2020, a proposal was floated to extend web-based channels and streaming platforms under the purview of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority.

Both proposals faced the same criticism as the Pakistan Media Development Authority: they have no place in the countrys democracy where Article 19 and 19-A of the Constitution exist which guarantee press freedom and right to information and were shelved as this one should be, too.

As the onslaught on civil society organisations nears completion through stringent registration requirements and surveillance, the press seems to be the next target for the red-tape induced fatigue to be imposed through yearly no-objection certificates, revocable licences, fines through tribunals, and cutting appeals by only allowing appeals to the Pakistan Supreme Court.

To form an authority to regulate films, electronic, print and digital media in Pakistan private and public altogether seems like one grand plan to make all media like the Pakistan Television, which Prime Minister Imran Khan had promised would be independent but is anything but.

It is essential for Pakistans democracy that media and internet regulators be independent instead of being subjected to the whims of government officials and hidden pressures. Regulators must be separate as the proposal only seeks to make separate wings of them and stop yearning for a hybrid regulatory framework that is nothing but an ill-informed big brother style censor with powers of imposing fines, revoking licenses and holding journalists livelihood hostage to state censorship.

This article first appeared in Dawn.

View post:
In Pakistan, attempts to control media are triumphing over efforts to protect the free press - Scroll.in

Turkeys leading university is accused of politically motivated retribution against a lecturer who supported student protests in what critics say is the latest example of academic freedom being curtailed in the country. For more stories from The Media Line go to themedialine.org Feyzi Erin, a lawyer and part-time lecturer, had his course canceled by the university at the end of May. His supporters say this was due to his very public support for students protesting against a government-appointed rector.Erin told The Media Line that Istanbuls Boazii University claimed it canceled his course because he was giving out inflated grades, an accusation that he said was blatantly false.The only reason could be that I (as a lawyer, fulfilling my public duties) responded to my students legal aid needs and assisted them in the unfair accusations and trials they have been through, he wrote in a message.Erin visited students at court after they were detained following protests at the university that broke out in January against Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoans appointment of rector Melih Bulu.Bulu is a member of Erdoans Justice and Development Party who had once run as a candidate in a national election.Students and much of the faculty said the process for his appointment was undemocratic and lacked transparency.The arrests of students garnered criticism from the US and the demonstrations drew similarities to the 2013 mass anti-government Gezi Park protests, which were followed by a large crackdown on civil society and the press.More protests were staged this week, with students setting up tents to stay on campus overnight, but local reports say the police forcibly took them off the grounds around midnight.Political science professor Zeynep Gambetti, who teaches part-time at Boazii after retiring in 2019, said Erins removal shows how far the new university administration is wiling to go.This is a turning point in that, until now, they hadnt really touched or meddled with curricula; they hadnt interfered this directly into departmental decision-making procedures, she said.The administration is showing its teeth now.Assistant professor of political science at Istanbuls Sabanc University, Berk Esen, said the government could not go after full-time faculty members in the same way as Erin because expelling them would be more difficult.Still, he said, the termination of Erins course could be a warning to both academic staff and part-time lecturers that they could be targeted.This is an utter attack, a personal vendetta by the Boazii administration, Esen told The Media Line.Basically the rectors office is going after [Erin].Boazii University and the Turkish government did not respond to The Media Lines requests for comment.In a previous email, Turkeys Directorate of Communications told The Media Line that the constitution allows the president to appoint rectors.Thats been the case for four decades, during which many governments with different political views were in charge."Not so," said Gambetti, who said that Boazii appointed its own rectors starting in the early 1990s, although the government stopped the practice when it put the country under emergency rule following the 2016 coup attempt.This is a government project; there is a puppet administration at Boazii, said Gambetti.She said other newly appointed high-level staff of the university had similar ties to the government, such as the dean of the Faculty of Law, Selami Kuran.Kuran has advocated for Erdoans highly contentious, multibillion-dollar project to build a canal in Istanbul.Turkish news website Duvar reported that Kuran was on a committee at Istanbuls Marmara University that disciplined academics who signed a 2016 petition calling on the government to peacefully end a conflict in the southeast involving the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) militia.Many signatories lost their jobs, and some were tried and convicted for disseminating terrorist propaganda.Following the coup attempt later that year, even more academics across Turkey were removed and some universities closed.However, Boazii, which some refer to as the Harvard of Turkey, has come under particular scrutiny.Following the protests in the winter, Erdoan called the students terrorists who didnt share the countrys values.In a statement to the Turkish state news channel TRT, Turkeys Communications Director Fahrettin Altun in February said the students of the university have in recent years joined terrorist organizations like the PKK.We must shed light on the darkness that turns some of our nations brightest students into terrorists. We also condemn the ongoing attempt to smear Boazii Universitys reputation by falsely portraying the radical views of a small group as the position of an entire community, he said.Gambetti said Boazii was one of the last bastions of academic freedom, and its diversity and liberal atmosphere combined with its high profile had made it a target.The reason why Boazii was so special is exactly the reason why the government wants to put its hands on it, she said.

The rest is here:
Teachers termination at Turkish university raise worry on govt control - The Jerusalem Post

Police officers evict people during a "macrobotellon" (drinking and dancing session) on a street, as the state of emergency decreed by the Spanish Government to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) gets lifted in Barcelona. Spain, May 10, 2021. REUTERS/Nacho Doce

Spanish regions with a low coronavirus infection rate will be allowed to reopen nightlife before herd immunity is achieved, which is expected by mid-August, the health minister said on Wednesday after meeting with regional authorities.

Regions with a 14-day notification rate of infections below 50 cases per 100,000 people will be able to open discos and clubs until 3 a.m., although some restrictions will continue.

It was not clear whether dance floors will be allowed and the party group - a maximum of six people inside - has to remain masked, according to local media.

"A gradual and progressive return to normality is needed. Lessons must be learned", the health minister, Carolina Darias, told journalists.

Health standards are in the hands of the regions in Spain, although according to the minister, this agreement is binding.

Madrid, where bars and restaurants are already open until 1 a.m. despite being one of the top five regions with the highest infection rates, rejects the criteria and wants more flexibility.

Spain's overall infection rate fell to 118.5 cases per 100,000 on Wednesday, nearly halving since the end of April, but only the Balearic islands, Valencia and the North African enclave of Ceuta meet the sub-50 requirement.

In medium-risk regions with a downward infection rate - which is most of the country - venues may also be opened but with a 30% indoor capacity.

Despite the drastic reduction in deaths, the official COVID-19 death toll on Wednesday passed the 80,000 mark.

With most Spanish clubs not welcoming revellers until after midnight and staying open well into the small hours, the proposal got a lukewarm welcome from the sector.

"The only good news is that they let us open, but obviously it is not worth opening until 2 a.m.", Ramon Mas, head of the Spain nightlife association Espana de Noche, told state broadcaster TVE.

Although Mas said he was confident the vaccination pace would allow the sector to recover after 10,000 clubs and discos have been closed for more than 14 months, he said government plans lacked a calendar to delay the closing hour or improve capacity.

Mas said clubs could offer a safer alternative than street parties which have been a common scene in Spanish cities during weekends since the state of emergency ended last month and could help drive a recovery in tourism.

"Tourists will come if they have the chance for a good time and the alternative until 2 a.m. is a very limited option," he told TVE.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read the rest here:
Spain permit limited nightlife in regions with COVID-19 under control - Reuters