Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

How buzzy app Clubhouse could grow beyond its exclusive beta – CNET

Clubhouse is a buzzy new social network.

On a Wednesday evening, there's a room filled with a handful of people, talking about their plants. The ones they have, the ones they want and the ones that've passed on to that big flower pot in the sky.

"Someone gave me an aloe plant two weeks ago, and I'm already killing it," one person says.

"Welcome to the world of killing unkillable plants," another responds.

This room isn't happening in defiance of pandemic best practices. After all, plant parents aren't a notoriously rebellious crowd. It's happening on a buzzy new app that launched this year, called Clubhouse.

Discover the latest news and best reviews in smartphones and carriers from CNET's mobile experts.

Clubhouse, which is still in beta and isn't yet available to the public, was founded by Paul Davison and Rohan Seth. It's an audio-based social platform. You can enter rooms (or create a room) and hear or participate in discussions on topics: how to pitch your startup idea, the future of marriage, whether Clubhouse is getting boring. Rooms generally have speakers, the way conference panels do, and moderators. The conversation is in real time, meaning you can hear folks throwing in their opinions about the subject at hand, and you can raise your hand to toss in yours as well.

"Imagine if you were in class with everybody in the world," said Natasha Scruggs, an attorney from Kansas City, Missouri, who's been on the app for a couple of weeks.

Clubhouse is the latest manifestation of our desire to connect to each other at a time when social distancing and remaining isolated at home is the new norm. But while videoconferencing services like Zoom have blown up for everyone, Clubhouse's largest appeal is its exclusivity and ability to draw in notable figures.

That hasn't always been a good thing. Over the summer, Clubhouse garnered headlines for an incident with New York Times reporter Taylor Lorenz, which kicked off a debate over Silicon Valley culture and how the media covers it. It also brought light to the more serious issue of how the platform will handle harassment and questionable content, like conspiracy theories and anti-media sentiment, cropping up in conversations.

The app has also garnered attention for the famous names who've popped in: Jared Leto, Tiffany Haddish and Ava DuVernay, to name a few. And with that has also come the type of juicy internet drama that people can't help rubberneck, like Tom Hanks' son Chet getting lambasted for his inexplicable proclivity for speaking Jamaican patois.

To borrow a line from Hamilton, Clubhouse is getting to be the room where it happens.

Clubhouse isn't the first audio-based app. Even Twitter is playing around with letting users post audio clips in their feeds. Why Clubhouse, though, is experiencing the kind of attention it is could be for a mix of reasons, including the perceived exclusivity.

"I don't think this exclusivity thing was part of the design," said Charlene Li, Altimeter founder and senior fellow.

Part of the point of a beta is to avoid opening your doors to the public while you're still trying to figure out how to make the app work. And yet sometimes making something exclusive will make people want it all the more -- it's the thing they can't have.

Clubhouse user Casie Stewart

It's hard to say just how many people are actually on the app, though you can find individual rooms with upward of 2,000 people. To get an invite, you have to know someone who's already on the app, and who has one to extend to you. That person's face will be on your profile indefinitely as the one who invited you in. Android users are out of luck for now.

In a July post, Davison and Seth said they wanted to grow the Clubhouse community slowly.

"This helps ensure that things don't break, keeps the composition of the community diverse, and allows us to tune the product as it grows," they said, also noting that their team is small.

Clubhouse also hit at a time when congregating in person is outright dangerous. Because many folks are stuck in their houses and apartments, the chance to connect with other people from all over the world, to actually hear voices, is appealing.

"Voice is so real," said Casie Stewart, a Toronto-based social and digital strategist who's been on the app for a little more than a week. "I was laughing with people."

One of the biggest questions surrounding Clubhouse, apart from where you can find an invite, is how it'll grow when it opens up and how people will use it.

For Silicon Valley acolytes, Clubhouse is a chance to brush elbows with the upper echelons of Techland -- like Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian, venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz (who've invested in Clubhouse), and Product Hunt founder Ryan Hoover. The CEOs of Pinterest, Github and Roblox have profiles as well.

It might not always be like that, though. And to be fair, Clubhouse isn't just a place for the Silicon Valley elite to hold court. There are plenty of rooms, about everything from dating and sex to songwriting and the music industry. There are rooms devoted to the representation of Black people in film and TV, and where the heck the Christmas spirit is this year. And yes, plenty for marketing and branding -- panels finally finding a home after a year without the likes of SXSW and other conferences.

Stewart said being on Clubhouse reminds her of the early days of Twitter. Brian Solis, digital anthropologist and global innovation evangelist at Salesforce, who knows Davison and has been on the app since nearly the beginning, echoed this, remembering how people came together to exchange ideas online. He can see parallels with the evolution of events like SXSW, which started off more intimate and more homespun.

Clubhouse still has some kinks to work through. One evening, in a room for new members, people asked about making it easier to find rooms as well as clubs (groups of people interested in a specific subject).

Whether Clubhouse pulls this off on a grand scale could have a major impact on its popularity post-beta.

"You need to start to think about what is that user experience going to look like, so that they're finding conversations that are relevant to them at the right time, and also that they're able to host and bring people into those conversations that would find them relevant," Solis said.

Then there's the question of how to handle harassment, particularly when there's not exactly a post to report or take down. And as many other social media networks are learning, the question of who decides what type of speech is appropriate or inappropriate is squishy.

This summer, Clubhouse saw one of its most notable flaps so far, when The New York Times' Lorenz ended up being the subject of a room where venture capitalists railed against the role of the tech press and Lorenz in particular, Motherboard reported. Vanity Fair has also reported concerns over anti-Semitic and racist content popping up on the site. Stewart, early on, was in a room where a user started graphically describing a sexual fantasy before that user got booted from the room by moderators.

Clubhouse user Natasha Scruggs

Audio also presents the challenge of potentially offensive views disappearing as soon as they've been uttered, making them hard to flag. Clubhouse's community guidelines do mention the ability to report someone in real time, allowing the app to retain a "temporary, encrypted audio recording for the purpose of investigating the incident."

"How do you ensure that the, quote, good conversations happen, versus bad conversations, and who should be the judge of that?" Li said, also noting that she's reassured by the diversity among the user base so far. "That gives me hope that the best way to moderate is for lots of different voices to be there."

A place like Clubhouse will never just be for individual users looking for advice or camaraderie.

Marketers and brand specialists are already thinking about what could come next. Li sees Clubhouse being able to leverage its exclusivity. For example, a brand might host some type of talk inside Clubhouse, promote it on other platforms, and pay Clubhouse to let them offer invites to Clubhouse for those who attend.

"There's an opportunity for brands to kind of have roundtable discussions or do contests, or [host] chat with experts," Stewart said.

Scruggs imagines Clubhouse being a place for live performances, concerts, podcasts and even the home of something akin to the radio serials of the mid-1900s, some of which could be ticketed. And on a more personal level, Scruggs has been wanting to branch out into social responsibility and diversity, focusing on the sports world. Earlier in the month, she hosted a room called "How pro sports teams and athletes can engage in meaningful activism." She sees Clubhouse as a way to learn, network and market herself in that space.

"With Clubhouse, you literally never know who's going to be in a room," she said.

See the original post here:
How buzzy app Clubhouse could grow beyond its exclusive beta - CNET

Leaked Documents Reveal China Hired Army of Trolls and Ordered Media to Control Coronavirus Narrative – International Business Times, Singapore…

China's heavy-handed approach in censoring media inside its border is widely known. This in particular came to light during the early days of the novel Coronavirus pandemic. While the local authorities were struggling in Wuhan to contain the virus outbreak, the Chinese government, through state-run media outlets, tried to showcase that the situation was not bad. And it was largely successful.

When Dr Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist from Wuhan, first warned about the emergence of a SARS-like pneumonia virus, Chinese authorities painted him as a rumor-monger. He was swiftly detained and forced to apologize for "spreading misinformation". But all hell broke loose when Dr Li died of COVID-19 on February 7. Outraged by the secrecy and silencing of Dr Li, Chinese citizens at home and abroad took to social media platforms to criticize the government.

But according to a trove of leaked documents, instead of apologizing, China's information control went beyond media censorship. China paid trolls to flood social media platforms with party-line chatters and if someone still dared to raise a voice, the individual was silenced by security forces.

The first task was to control the narrative so that Dr Li's death would not fuel a so-called uprising. News outlets were ordered to remove Dr Li's name from trending topic pages and asked not to alert push notifications about the news of his death. Furthermore, the paid trolls were asked to distract anything that remotely connected Dr Li's death or Coronavirus.

"All cyberspace administration bureaus must pay heightened attention to online opinion and resolutely control anything that seriously damages party and government credibility and attacks the political system," one directive said, adding that commentators must conceal their identity. "As commenters fight to guide public opinion, they must conceal their identity, avoid crude patriotism and sarcastic praise, and be sleek and silent in achieving results," it added.

The leaked documents that included over 3,200 directives and 1,800 memos were shared with ProPublica and New York Times by a hacker group called CCP Unmasked. It detailed the extent of control China had on information.

The documents outlined how the Chinese government suppressed information related to the Coronavirus outbreak something the U.S. and its allies have accused Beijing of for months. As per the documents from the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), Hangzhou, the government began controlling information about the new virus in early January when the disease was not even identified definitively.

According to 2015 estimates, over 54 percent of China's population or over 760 million people use the internet. That is more than the double of U.S. population. Hence, controlling internet opinion is not a mean task. China's Great Firewall has been effective in stopping information coming from sources outside the border. However, to control internet chatter inside its borders, China needed something special.

The ProPublica report says that China has specialized software to control internet chatters. Urun, a local software company, provides such a service to the Chinese government. The software can track online trends and manage fake social media accounts to post comments as per the party line. It also allows the users to add likes to the comments through a user-friendly interface. Managers of the software can also assign commentators to perform specific tasks.

1 of 3

The commentators from Guangzhou supposedly get $25 for each post of about 400 characters while they earn 40 cents for flagging a negative comment. The software also allows managers to keep track of the commentators' posts and how much they should be paid.

The software also has a smartphone app that makes the job easier. Commentators can see the tasks they are assigned and post accordingly from their personal social media accounts. Once done, they can upload the screenshot to mark the task as completed. Then there is a training course for upcoming commentators. Urun has produced an easy-to-learn software for trainees. After completion of training, they are divided into two groups of Red and Blue and compete against each other to produce the most popular posts.

"China has a politically weaponized system of censorship. It is refined, organized, coordinated and supported by the state's resources. It's not just for deleting something. They also have a powerful apparatus to construct a narrative and aim it at any target with a huge scale. No other country has that," Xiao Qiang, a research scientist from UC Berkeley's School of Information told ProPublica.

1 of 4

As for controlling news outlets, it is easier. Either they fall in line and accept payments from the government or they would be prosecuted. The CAC supplies the news outlets with government narratives that they are supposed to publish. As per the documents, the CAC asks the news outlets not only to control narrative within China but also "influence international opinion".

That's not it. The CAC also offers directives to news outlets on which news story should be displayed on the home page and for how long. Apart from that, media houses were ordered not to use words like "fatal", "incurable" in the headline while reporting about COVID-19. As for reporting on movement and travel restrictions, they were ordered not to use the word "lockdown".

Apart from paid trolls and media, China exerts great control on social media platforms. The tech giants are ordered to censor any negative commentary about China while anything that the government believes to be problematic is censored. Even the personal chat messages are monitored and any link to dissent is swiftly dealt with.

Visit link:
Leaked Documents Reveal China Hired Army of Trolls and Ordered Media to Control Coronavirus Narrative - International Business Times, Singapore...

Apple killed it this year, and Android needs a shot in the arm – Android Authority

Credit: Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Opinion post by

Robert Triggs

We all love Android, but come on Apple killed it this year.

Cupertino hit the ground running with the refreshed iPhone SE early in the year. It showed Android manufacturers how to blend cutting edge performance, flagship features, and an affordable price tag into a winning formula. Its hard to name an Android equivalent thats quite as good at all three. Not only did the phone review very well, but it set the benchmark for incredible value this year.

The Apple iPad refresh, the Watch Series 6, and the iPhone 12 series are all predictably competent pieces of hardware too. Theyve refined what weve come to expect from Apple products over the years. Cupertino certainly knows how to make and market high-end products, helping to keep Android tablets and smartwatches at an arms length. The company also shook up its various subscription services, combining them under the more competitively priced Apple One bundle. Its a leaner, more competitive force in the media steaming race as a result, which certainly doesnt hurt Apples broader ecosystem either.

Apple rounded out 2020 with its most sweeping change in years. Arm-based Macs with custom Apple silicon will eventually end the companys dependence on Intel CPUs. This has ushered in a new era of hardware and ecosystem control, from processors through to operating systems. The closer melding of hardware and software will yield dividends for future products in terms of performance and features. The switch to Arm-based PCs unifies the processor architecture with iPad and iPhone platforms too, blurring the lines between PC and mobile. Apple now has sufficient control to drive performance, photography, gaming, security, and other features across all its platforms in whatever way it sees fit.

The blazing-fast Apple M1 chip is bound to upset the MacBook and laptop markets, as well as Intel. However, its likely to be a headache for developers in the short term. Perhaps more importantly, the long-running Wintel paradigm is under increasing pressure too. Windows on Arm, which is currently powered by Qualcomm silicon, may see faster uptake from Microsofts hardware partners if Apples switch to Arm yields sufficient dividends for consumers.

Apple is definitely in the ascendancy as 2020 comes to a close.

iPhone 12 Pro Max

Credit: David Imel / Android Authority

It would be wrong to characterize this year as a flawless victory though. Apple generated its fair share of controversies throughout 2020 as well.

The company clashed heads with Fortnite publisher Epic Games earlier in the year over its 30% revenue cut and publishing conditions. Apple ended up removing Fortnite from its App Store. It also moved to terminate Epics access to developer accounts and tools. This saga didnt help assuage sentiments that Apple isnt very developer-friendly. Neither did the companys argument with email subscription service Hey over a similar subscription dispute. Damage control has subsequently seen Apple drop its app free to 15% for smaller developers.

Hardware hasnt been a slam dunk this year either. The AirPods Pro Max headphones have come in for some flak for their exorbitant $550 price tag. Especially as rivals like the Sony WH-1000XM4 and the Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700 come in much cheaper. If annoying gamers and audiophiles wasnt enough, Apple also managed to irritate virtually all of its iPhone 12 customers by ditching in-box chargers.

See also: The charger-less iPhone 12 isnt as eco-friendly as Apple wants you to think

While there are eco-waste arguments about in-box chargers worth considering, Apple doesnt earn any goodwill for its decision. Moving over to a Lightning to USB-C cable means some customers cant charge their new iPhone 12 with older iPhone chargers. Having to buy a new USB-C charger undermines the waste argument, as does the potential longer-term move to the proprietary MagSafe standard. Even so, I would encourage customers to contemplate picking up a single USB-C charger for their phone and laptop needs.

Apple certainly hasnt improved its pretty dire reputation for unfriendly consumer and industry practices this year.

Credit: Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Despite a few PR setbacks, Apples hardware and ecosystem launches have left the company in a stronger place than at the start of the year and with a clear vision for 2021. Its harder to say the same for the Android ecosystem.

2020 saw the arrival of some very interesting Android phones at more affordable price points. Inexpensive 5G handsets, such as the Google Pixel 4a 5G and OnePlus Nord, have made next-gen networking more affordable than ever. Android has nailed the price and performance sweet spot this year. Theres been a familiar assortment of powerful Android flagships too, which are every bit as good as the latest iPhones, if not better. However, high-end products arent shaking up the industry on their own.

Related: Does Google have a reply to Apples all-in-one ecosystem?

Apple is moving towards a unified platform for smartphones, wearables, TV, and now PCs. Cupertino is tightening up its ecosystem, with a view to ensure all its devices and services play nicely together in the future. Expansive ecosystems that cater to all your technological needs is where the premium market is heading. Android manufacturers dont have this luxury. They are relying on Google, Microsoft, and others to link and wrangle various devices together.

Samsung is perhaps the only Android brand with a broad enough product range to compete with Apple. Tizen-powered smartwatches come closer to rivaling the Apple Watch than their Wear OS counterparts. The company also has a range of smart appliances and audio products under its belt, although its tablet selection especially the iPad Pro-rivaling Galaxy Tab S7 Plus is a case study in Googles software holding back otherwise good hardware. By comparison, Apples iPad range reaps the benefits of a unified approach to premium hardware and software. All that said, Samsung still doesnt have a powerhouse PC platform or stakes in the streaming market as Apple. Meanwhile, Google fancies itself an Apple competitor too but barely registers in terms of product shipments.

Android manufacturers can't exert the same control and influence across their broader product ranges as Apple.

While the long-overdue Google TV update for Android TV offered some much-needed ecosystem improvements on the streaming front, Chromebooks in their current form arent going to unite Googles mobile and PC platforms. Not in the same way as Apples Arm-Macs. Assistant and Google services are still great to use across multiple devices, of course, especially in the automotive and smart home market. But theres currently no vision to unify apps across these platforms and PCs. Thats something enterprise customers will contemplate even more so than us typical consumers. Likewise, Googles TV, wearables, and gaming initiatives are still disjointed and underdeveloped.

So, Im personally awarding this year to Apple. The company has a clear and exciting vision for the next few years. By comparison, 2020 has been mostly business as usual for Android and Google. That isnt necessarily a bad thing. Weve seen plenty of good handsets this year. However, Android and Google appear less forward-looking than their biggest rival. For now at least.

Continued here:
Apple killed it this year, and Android needs a shot in the arm - Android Authority

Perigee Raises Pre-Seed to Bring Security and Performance to HVAC and Environmental Controls – PRNewswire

BOSTON, Dec. 17, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Perigee, founded by a former NSA mathematician, combines network exploitation and machine learning expertise to stop malicious threats, improve behavior, and extend the life of connected devices in real-time. Today, Perigee announced the closing of their first institutional capital round of $1.5M.

The round was led by Outsiders Fund's Austin McChord and Teddy Seem, with additional investment from Westport, Contour Venture Partners, BBG Ventures, Innospark Ventures, Ray Rothrock, and Corey Thomas. The newly invested capital will be used to hire new talent, further develop the product, and grow the enterprise within environmental controls and beyond.

McChord, founder and former CEO of data backup service Datto, said, "Teddy and I are incredibly excited to work with such a talented team. This space is clamoring for new thinking and we are really excited to be backing Mollie and her vision around how the ever-changing security landscape can be improved."

Perigee's founder and CEO Mollie Breen previously led a team at NSA where she focused on critical infrastructure. With Perigee, she is extending that expertise to critical infrastructure across enterprises with a specific focus on connected devices.

The same brand of connected thermostats installed in the physician lounge and in the NICU will inevitably be a part of a different workflow and have a different risk profile. Perigee isolates threats unique to a specific thermostat, in real-time, in order to minimally impact an enterprise's critical operations.

"Connected devices are used to increase the ROI of certain critical operations by making them faster and automated, and we focus on increasing the ROI of the devices themselves by making them more trustworthy and longer lasting," Breen said.

Perigee is uniquely positioned to bridge IoT security and IoT analytics.

Breen said: "Analytics solutions are often not built with security in mind. We are a security-first solution, that quantifies improvements in a single device's overall behavior and hygiene, for all devices."

The company is focusing initially on devices within HVAC and environmental controls in critical industries like healthcare at a time when these sensors are of the utmost importance.

"HVAC and Environmental Controls play an important part in patient care. If you don't have those, especially now due to COVID-19, you're not taking care of them. These systems are just as important as your Electronic Medical Record. Secure them like it," said Mitch Parker, CISO of Indiana University Health.

The Perigee team sees HVAC and environmental controls as the optimal starting point to expand into the growing footprint of connected devices.

Breen said: "As real estate developers look to healthcare to set future standards for healthier buildings, working with hospitals means we understand the most critical devices today, and in the future too."

About Perigee

Perigee provides protection and enhancement for connected devices' entire life cycle. Perigee was founded in 2019 by former NSA mathematician Mollie Breen, CEO.Learn more at: http://www.getperigee.com

SOURCE Perigee

https://www.getperigee.com

Here is the original post:
Perigee Raises Pre-Seed to Bring Security and Performance to HVAC and Environmental Controls - PRNewswire

QAnon activists respond to our database of their activists – Business Insider – Business Insider

The core of QAnon consists of about 200 identifiable people who are responsible for creating, publicizing, and enabling the QAnon movement, an investigation by Insider has found.

QAnon followers believe in multiple fictitious conspiracy theories around the idea that the world is controlled by a satanic cabal of child-abusing wealthy liberals. They obsessively deconstruct the internet posts of the anonymous "Q Clearance Patriot," who claims to be a US national-security insider.

They are gaining influence within the Republican party. President Trump has tweeted pro-Q messages more than 200 times. And dozens of GOP candidates used Q propaganda during their campaigns, Insider's research found.

We put QAnon's most prominent people into a searchable database so that the public can better understand how this movement works. The database includes celebrities, politicians, activists, military veterans, men's rights activists, media personalities, and the name of the person who probably is the mysterious "Q".

Our research created a rare opportunity: To speak to the actual people behind the most influential conservative grassroots political movement since the Tea Party. In interviews, emails, and direct messages, the real people who sustain QAnon told us what they really thought.

Many of them were unhappy to be the focus of media attention.

One of the most striking things about QAnon is the difference between the way its activists see themselves and the way their supporters actually behave in real life. QAnon activists frequently insist that they are peaceful, respectful, and want only the best for others in their search for "the truth." But our reporters encountered hostility and threats multiple times simply by asking for comment or information.

An example of the welcoming side of QAnon is Christian Suprean, who says he was "once a construction worker by trade who struggled with drug addictions and life in general." Now he calls himself an entrepreneur, mentor, and marketer. He was also a presenter at "QCon Live" a conference for Q supporters held in Las Vegas in October 2020.

When Insider reached him for comment, he said, "It's the most amazing movement I've ever been involved with. It's filled with love. It's filled with humility for the most part. And it's filled with love for our country and for God. And I have made some of the most amazing friends that will be lifelong friends throughout this journey, following Q and meeting people with Q."

That's a pretty common sentiment among QAnon followers. It could be the movement's internal mantra. It was certainly one of the more positive reactions Insider received as we put together the database.

But compare that with what happened when one of our reporters contacted Gab CEO Andrew Torba, to ask why he had welcomed QAnon supporters to his platform after they were banned from Twitter and other networks.

Before our work was published, he posted a preemptive attack on his own website. "They are working on a major hit piece attacking everyone and anyone connected to the community of millions of great patriots who are seeking the truth outside of legacy media narratives," he wrote.

In turn, that message inspired dozens of anonymous Q sympathizers and Gab users to conduct a campaign of harassment against our reporter, some of it racist.

"QAnoners and Gab readers began to spam email and message me across several platforms. That continued for about one hellish week until my partner graciously offered to monitor my social media and block stuff for me so I could feel more at peace and not deal with it," Insider reporter Yelena Dzhanova said.

One message (with typos) targeting her said: "The bitch got the response she deserved. She isnt a journalist, shes an activist."

Remember, these messages were all coming from people who had not yet read our story. But they were already sure it would be wrong. And they were comfortable tormenting a stranger on the internet.

Broadly, responses from QAnon members to our investigation fell into five categories:

Perhaps unsurprisingly, since the FBI designated QAnon a potential domestic terrorism threat in August 2019, many people who had an active hand in QAnon no longer want to be associated with it.

"I've never said I know who Q is. I don't know who Q is," Jim Watkins told us. Watkins is the founder of 8kun, the web chat board on which Q lists his mysterious "drops." A previous Insider investigation showed that Watkins is the prime suspect for the real identity of Q.

Manuel Chavez III, a YouTuber who sometimes uses the name "Defango" or "@d3fango", claims he had a role in developing Q as an "alternative-reality game" (or Live Action Role Play) for fun to "smoke out bad journalists."

Now he regrets his involvement, he told Insider. "I've never promoted the Qanon movement whatsoever. I've only ever made videos trying to debunk it and get it shut down. I created the idea for Qanon and left it after I realize the people that were helping me start it were Internet trolls that were kind of anti-Semitic," he said.

Similarly, Lauren Boebert, the winning Republican candidate for Colorado's 3rd Congressional District, once praised QAnon. On a radio show she said she hoped QAnon "is real because it only means America is getting stronger and better."

When reached by Insider, however, she disavowed the movement. "Lauren has repeatedly stated on the record she is not a follower of QAnon," a spokesperson told us.

Lauren Boebert poses for a portrait at Shooters Grill in Rifle, Colorado on April 24, 2018. She now denies supporting QAnon. EMILY KASK/AFP via Getty Images

Interestingly, many people with a public track record of publicizing QAnon ideas were coy about their involvement when we asked. A typical stance was to claim that they were not Q believers but merely investigating.

Mark Manicki, an Illinois police officer who has appeared at Q rallies with Q insignia on his clothing, said: "I'm merely analyzing the information I've been presented with and sharing my analysis of that information on social media. It's then up to anyone reading it to form their own opinion. is it fiction, or non-fiction, that's entirely up to the reader to decide."

Multiple QAnoners made legal threats against Insider and its staff for asking them for a comment. There was also a persistent theme around the idea that members of the media only tell lies and distortions.

Krystal Tini, an influencer and model, declined to respond in detail. "It would be wise to start reporting REAL news and not bashing people for spreading truth. You and your cronies are a disgrace to call yourselves journalists," she told us. "My attorney will be reaching out."

A minority of the people in the database confirmed their involvement and said they were proud to be part of QAnon. Champ Parinya, a lifestyle guru, said "QAnon is but one small piece of the grand puzzle on the path to awakening to the greater truths of reality."

By far the largest category were those who did not comment or declined to comment. (We were also unable to reach a handful of prominent Q supporters. If any of them want to contact us with comments we will be happy to add them.)

But there is no need to take our word for it. Browse the QAnon database for yourself here. We included a quote from each person on the list who responded.

Follow this link:
QAnon activists respond to our database of their activists - Business Insider - Business Insider