Mediaboss Marketing

MarcoStyle's hijacked YouTube page, with a verfied hacker

My first interaction with MarcoStyle was him telling me I was wrong. I dont remember what about Ubisofts The Division we were arguing about specifically, but I heard my name come up in his YouTube video about how I had the wrong take on some issue or another in a recent article. Probably the Dark Zone, if I had to guess.

Three years later, the now 24 year-old Marco has grown his gaming channel substantially. Still probably best known for his Division content, hes also branched into Destiny as of late, and his YouTube channel has swelled to 350,000 subscribers.

And he almost lost it all in an instant.

Marco watched everything hed built burn starting on November 2 when he replied to an email looking to advertise on his channel. It seemed like a real company and a standard offer for a channel of his size, but when he clicked a link for the product, an installer buried itself on his computer.

He immediately knew what was happening. He cut power to his PC, did a fresh Windows install and changed all his login info. But it was already too late.

The hacker got into his computer, got into his Google account bypassing two-factor authentication and extracted his YouTube account from his Gmail. He also lost his Twitch, but was able to regain control of it manually fairly quickly.

As soon as Marco lost control of his channel, he contacted YouTube, who did reply that day at least acknowledging the issue. But at that point, the hacker was still in constant motion.

Marcos channel was sold on a Russian website for hacked YouTube channels, which is a thing that exists in 2019. All his videos were taken down. His profile was changed to read Brad Garlinghouse, with the name and picture of the real-life CEO of fintech company Ripple.

Five days later, YouTube still had not blocked the hackers access or let Marco know what was happening, and on November 7, the hacker started running a livestream meant to scam viewers out of money. By the time the stream was over, it reportedly stole about $15,000 from viewers Ripple wallets, and it turns out this Brad Garlinghouse takeover of larger channels is actually a fairly frequent occurrence. That scam stream was now the only video on Marcos entire channel, which had been torn away from him completely.

Other "Brad Garlinghouses" that have seemingly taken over existing channels.

I know that I'm not on the top of the list when it comes to channel size, Marco told me, so I accepted that it would probably take more time for things to get sorted. But when there was a scam going on, on my channel that did not get taken down for 24 hours, I got pretty stressed out. 'What if my viewers think it's me and get scammed?' 'What if those viewers go to the police and report that a channel called 'marcostyle' scammed them?' 'How can YouTube remove videos far quicker for far less, while an illegal scam with 1000s of reports is allowed to stay up?'

The hack and scam wasnt even the strangest part of the entire ordeal. Rather, the most baffling moment came when Brad Garlinghouse, the clearly fake identity of a clearly hacked YouTube channel, actually managed to earn a verification badge from YouTube, something Marco had attempted to get for ages, but never was given.

Marco's actual channel

Marco documented the entire unfolding saga on Twitter where it attracted the attention of fellow YouTubers of various sizes from Gladd to Datto to Keemstar. Eventually, it caught the eye of Ryan Fwiz Wyatt, Global Head of Gaming at YouTube, and an actual end finally started to feel like it was forthcoming on November 9 with YouTube getting back in touch and appearing to prioritize a fix. It took until yesterday, November 13, for MarcoStyle to get control of his channel again and see his videos restored, 11 days after the hack had started. Its not clear how long it might have taken if Marco had a smaller channel or if others hadnt started making noise about it on social media. But it was nearly an utter catastrophe for a content creator where everything hed spent years building could seemingly be wiped out from one simple click.

I've thought a lot about how my YouTube career could come to an end at one point, Marco said. Maybe the game I'd play simply wouldn't have a big enough audience, maybe I'd grow bored of it, or maybe at one point I just fall off because the type of content I make doesn't get pushed through YouTube, and in those cases, I'd sort of be fine with it, because then at least I tried and ended up not being good enough. But to go down like this, where I was about to do better than ever before with my Destiny 2 content and about to blow up (at least I thought so, I could be wrong) and then have my channel get hacked and destroyed, that is just infuriating.

Marco is certainly not the first YouTuber to get hacked, but it was a higher profile case and one that still took a substantial amount of time to be resolved, considering how quickly YouTube often takes action on other channels for various offenses. To get its side of the story, I first spoke with Ryan Wyatt, who referred me to YouTube PR, and I sent them a laundry list of questions regarding how to better protect accounts and report hijackings, but also about why this wasnt flagged when the hacker was carving through the channel, why it took so long to regain control of and fix the account, and how on earth the hacker managed to actually get verified as all this was happening.

YouTube sent me back only the following statement the day Marcos channel was restored:

We take account security very seriously and regularly notify users when we detect suspicious activity. We encourage users to enable two-factor authentication as part of Google's account Security Checkup, which decreases the risk of hacking. If a user has reason to believe their account was compromised, they can notify our team to secure the account and regain control. "

This is, in fact, word for word identical to a statement they sent to Forbes over a month ago for a different story we wrote about an increased rise in spear phishing attacks, similar to the one that affected Marco. It is par for the course for YouTube which operates in a black box most of the time. Cryptic answers, if any, with most of the responsibility directed at the user, not the platform that should be helping to protect them.

Marco did get his account back, thats a happy ending at least. Hes relieved and is just happy the ordeal is over, as he expressed in a recent comeback video posted to his channel.

He lost the hackers verified badge.

Follow meon Twitter,FacebookandInstagram. Pre-order my new sci-fi novelHerokiller, and read my first series,The Earthborn Trilogy, which is also onaudiobook.

Here is the original post:
A YouTuber With 350,000 Subscribers Was Hacked, YouTube Verified His Hacker - Forbes

Conservative Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay has been slammed for spouting misleading nonsense in order to win the votes of football fans.

Speaking in a video on Twitter yesterday, Barclay said that his Brexit deal will allow the UK to decide whether we want more English qualified players in the Premier League, or whether we want more talented players from Brazil, Africa, Argentina.

Firstly, someone needs to explain to Barclay that Africa isnt a country and, secondly, that hes being grossly misleading.

As many people have pointed out, including trade expert Steve Peers, EU immigration law in no way affects the number of non-EU players in the Premier League.

Indeed, the UK already has control over its non-EU immigration policy we can decide who we want to come to the country.

In any event, the Premier League is currently the best football league in the world for a reason: it boasts an exceptional blend of English, European and non-European talent. Barclay wants to turn the PL into a mediocre spectacle by scapegoating and lying about immigrants.

The perfect metaphor for Brexit.

Visit link:
Brexit Secretary accused of "lying" to voters about immigration to win the "football vote" - Scram News

Hi PaulHorwood1,

I'm Stefano an Independent Advisor, here to help you. Axis Media Control is an Internet Explorer plug-in that enables some types of streaming media to be played within the browser such as motion JPEG and H.264 video. Under normal circumstances, you are prompted to download the Axis Media Control plug-in when you visit a website that requires it. However, there may be situations in which the automatic download does not function properly. If this is the case, Axis Media Control can be downloaded manually from the Axis website. Download Axis Media Control if you are having trouble viewing a website that requires it. Try to change the active X setting on your internet explorer. a. Open Internet Explorer b. Click on Tools, click 'Internet Options, click Security. c. Now, click Custom level. d. Scroll down the list to ActiveX. e. Make sure all 'ActiveX' controls are enabled .

Please let me know if after that you can use Axis Media Control or if you need more help.

1 person was helped by this reply

Did this solve your problem?

Yes No

Sorry this didn't help.

Great! Thanks for marking this as the answer.

How satisfied are you with this reply?

Thanks for your feedback, it helps us improve the site.

How satisfied are you with this response?

Thanks for your feedback.

See the rest here:
Axis media control on windows 10 - Microsoft Community

Media monitoring is the activity of monitoring the output of the print, online and broadcast media.[citation needed] It can be conducted for a variety of reasons, including political, commercial, scientific, and so on.

In the commercial sphere, this activity is usually carried out in house or by a media monitoring service, a private company that provides such services to other companies, organisations and individuals on a subscription basis.

The services that media monitoring companies provide typically include the systematic recording of radio and television broadcasts, the collection of press clippings from print media publications, the collection of data from online information sources. The material collected usually consists of any media output that makes reference to the client, its activities and/or its designated topics of interests. The monitoring of online consumer sources such as blogs, forums and social networks is more specifically known as buzz monitoring which informs the company of how its service or product is perceived by users.

While monitoring social media it can be beneficial for a company to respond to as many posts as possible. Not all comments will be positive ones, but it is good for the customers to know they are being heard. It is also important to keep in mind to avoid deleting any unfavorable content from a social media page you control. You should assume that something on the Internet was seen by at least one person, no matter how quickly you delete it. Deleting the comment can make the company look even worse and give the idea of a cover-up which implies guilt on the companys part.

Most media monitoring is done within private public relations agencies or businesses in house public relations sectors. Publicists will track the number of times the company was mentioned within different platforms. Some of the main platforms include magazines, newspaper, blogs, and social media. These entries are referred to as clippings and are compiled into monthly reports by the Public Relations firm. These clippings are then presented to the client along with the circulation and impressions from these platforms. Circulation is how many subscribers or viewers the platform has, and impressions are calculated by multiplying the circulation by three. Impressions are only calculated for print media because it is assumed print media will be circulated past the original subscribers. These figures are calculated to show the client approximately how many people their message has reached. Media monitoring is a beneficial tool to evaluate the efforts and progress of a PR firm.

In academia media monitoring is deployed by social scientists in an attempt to discover e.g. biases in the way the same event is presented in different media, among the media of different countries etc. The use of large scale monitoring techniques by computer scientists enabled the exploration of different aspects of the media system such as the visualisation of the media-sphere,[1] the sentimental and objectivity analysis of news content[2] etc.

Media monitoring is practically achieved by a combination of technologiesincluding audio and video recording, high speed text scanners and text recognition softwareand human readers and analysts. The automation of the process is highly desirable and can be partially achieved by deploying data mining and machine learning techniques.

See the original post here:
Media monitoring - Wikipedia

Why The Government Should Control the Media

As we know, the media plays is an important role in the modern live. The traditional media is a kind of social communication including films, images, music, spoken word and writing. It can be spread by televisions, newspapers and radios. However, in modern time people can easily communicate by more kinds of media tools such as mobile phones and computers because of the development of technology. The media has a big influence on our live. Nobody will doubt the modern media takes people to a new world where people can be closer to each other. On the other hand, it is also a dangerous thing because new kinds of criminals appears. These criminals have attracted people's attention to discuss about whether the media should be controlled by government or not.

Some people support the government to control the media. Firstly, the government is responsible to keep the teenagers to grow in a healthy environment which might be harmed by the modern media. Because the widely spread of information technology, people can get numerous information without any difficulties through the internet. For example, in Japan, adult movie are legal and they are available on TV channels, its quite harmful for young people, then if you can watch TV in the U.S it is easy for you to watch extremely violence shows, such as the WWE and the UFC. Also, the teenager is a group of the users and they are easier to be affected. However, teenagers are too young to distinguish whether the information is health or not. Sometimes they meet some information which is not appropriate through the media. As a result, their mental health is harmed by the media because of the misuse. Therefore media misleads teenagers which turn to be a big trouble for the society. And people claim that government should take the responsibility to control the media in order to protect the teenagers and make sure that the environment is health for teenagers to grow up. Secondly, the media could be taken advantage by criminals. Internet fraud is a very good example to explain that. It is a new kind of criminals as people use media to harm others. Because of the technology, criminals can very easy to hire themselves behind the internet which makes this problem more difficult to solve with. And the victims are not able to protect themselves if the government does not intervene. It turns out that the media should be controlled by government in order to keep the society security and the relevant laws are necessary to be used to restrict people to take the use of the media.

On the other hand, some people do not agree with it. Firstly, they support the media should be free to accessed by society. They think it is a human right for everyone. They regard the free is the most important issue and do not want to lose it from government. Secondly, some people support the media can be a role to supervise government from society. In this groups opinions, some people support the media should not to be controlled by any authorities. If the media controlled by government, the public might be cheated by government and could not get the truth any more. Moreover, some people pointed out that it would disturb the development of media if the government intervene it. As Adam Smith said, the invisible hand controls the market and motives people to pursue their own benefits. It suggests that the industry could develop better if the government does not intervene it. The media is an important industry which could promote the development of the society as a whole. The free and high speed development could provide more benefits to the public. Thus the government should not control the media which might have negative influence on the media development.

In my opinion, I am agree with the government to control the media in some areas. It is necessary to keep a health environment and the social security. I think the intervention by the government could contribute to the development of the modern media. However, the government should not do too much to disturb the media to tell the truth to the public. For example, the Chinese government has blocked some website such as Youtube, Facebook. They keep controlling the media by an excuse as they are responsible to protect the national security. However, the true reason for the government to do this is just used to maintain their power. In China, it is very difficult for the public to know the truth since the media is totally controlled by the government. Thus the media has lost its ability to supervise the government and turns to be a tool used by the government to control people's thinking. It is very bad example that government control the media. I think the Chinese government should learn more from the westerns. For example, in America, the media is free to publish the truth to the public and the government does not disturb the media. The American people can get more truth from the media than Chinese people. And the American media develops better than Chinese media. Thus, I think government should not forbid the media to tell the truth to the public. Also the freedom of media is a kind of the human rights, people got the right to know different sorts of information and express their opinions, if the government shut peoples mouths up and also blind their eyes, human will not be human anymore and become to act like robots, a country full of robots instead of human can not develop any more.

To conclude, there are both advantages and disadvantages for government to control the media. It would contribute to protect the social security but disturb people free and right. In my personal opinion, government should control the media in some area such as decrease the media criminals. However, they should not abuse their power by controlling the media by preventing them to tell the truth.

Go here to see the original:
Why The Government Should Control the Media | Free Content Web