Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

Trump: Fake news media is ‘out of control’ – Politico

President Donald Trump tweeted that "the Fake News should listen to what [Jerry Falwell] had to say." | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

By DIAMOND NAGA SIU

08/21/2017 10:36 AM EDT

President Donald Trump railed against fake news Monday after Jerry Falwell Jr. defended the presidents comments on the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Jerry Falwell of Liberty University was fantastic on @foxandfriends, Trump tweeted. The Fake News should listen to what he had to say. Thanks Jerry!

Story Continued Below

Falwell Jr., the universitys president, went on Fox to praise Trumps comments on white supremacists and counter-protesters that clashed in Charlottesville.

I think he was very clear who the culprits were, because he called out the Nazis, the white supremacists, the KKK members by name, Falwell Jr. said. He didnt call out the ones who committed violence on the other side by name he never mentioned Antifa, he made it clear that there was no moral equivalency between the two.

Falwell Jr. also said that, as someone who knows Trump well, he could attest that the president does not have a racist bone in his body.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Trump also posted another tweet five minutes later to thank a follower that defended him, while using it as another opportunity to further his point.

Thank you, Trump said to the account admiring how he never backs down from people trying to take him down, the very dishonest Fake News Media is out of control!"

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

See the article here:
Trump: Fake news media is 'out of control' - Politico

Does the brand crackdown on media transparency go far enough? – Marketing Week

The last year has seen digital ad spend dominate the marketing conversation and not often for the right reasons. There seems to have been one issue after another, from the YouTube brand safety scandal to Facebooks measurement errors and the media transparency concerns raised by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) report.

What has exacerbated these is the lack of understanding among marketers when it comes to their media investments, which was clear in the reaction to all three issues. Those that pulled their ads from YouTube seemed to have no idea how their ads could have appeared next to content from white supremacists. Similarly, few had any idea about agency kickbacks, with most claiming ignorance.

And very few have openly admitted there is a problem. Procter & Gamble (P&G) is one of barely a handful of brands to have admitted to errors and to have been vocal about the need for change. Ask any other marketer and they quickly change the subject.

READ MORE: Mark Ritson P&Gs Marc Pritchard has made the biggest marketing speech for 20 years

Unsurprisingly, few in the industry thought anything would actually change. Facebook and Google continue to hoover up digital ad spend, most brands (bar the likes of the Guardian and Marks & Spencer) are back advertising on YouTube and marketers are still increasing digital ad spend.

But quietly and behind the scenes many brands have been changing how they think about digital and stepping up standards and governance.

[Marketers] are attacking these issues from multiple fronts, there is a real effort to transform. And there are three key areas where data and technology, people and capability, and transparency and contracts, says Matt Green, global media and digital marketing lead at the World Federation of Advertisers.

A survey conducted by the WFA found that, for example, 65% have hired internally for positions such as head of programmatic or media directors over the past 12 months. High-profile examples include P&G hiring Gerry DAngelo as global media director in September last year. Tesco also hired its first head of media in April, while Airbnb appointed its first media director in former Unilever marketer Geoff Seeley earlier this month.

In addition, 18% of marketers are planning to bring their programmatic stack in-house, on top of the 18% that have already done so. A further 41% want to take greater control of their spend. Deutsche Telekom, for example, launched an internal project earlier this year to shake up how it works with agencies, data firms and ad tech companies, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Other still are looking to improve standards and governance. Some 53% of those questions said they now have auditing rights written into contracts. Innocent is one of those brands.

Weve put in place more of a robust set of criteria to how we buy media in a digital space, says Jamie Sterry, Innocents head of brand.

Digital advertising is now the single biggest chunk of media spend. According to AA/Warc data, digital accounted for more than half of spend in the UK in the first quarter.

At the same time, the media landscape overall is becoming more complex, meaning brands need more oversight to be sure their spend is as effective as possible.

It is often due to legacy reasons, but there are a significant number of brands that dont have or have very limited in-house media expertise, which given the complexity of the landscape can mean there are significant opportunities to maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of their investments further, says Alex Tait, former Unilever media & marketing services director and founder of Entropy Consulting.

Brands have started to respond to this and are realising the significant P&L opportunity in driving growth but also in realising efficiencies.

In the old days, brands could have a few agencies that managed the process of media planning and buying across (far fewer) broadcast channels. However, now channel fragmentation and developments in technology mean brands need to work across the full customer journey and have relationships with an ever-growing array of players from creative agencies to production houses to Facebook and Google themselves and ad tech players.

This has resulted in a rethink of how brands organise themselves and the need for a more collaborative approach.

Brands have started to respond to this and are realising the significant P&L opportunity in driving growth but also in realising efficiencies.

Brands now need to organise themselves, including their internal teams, agencies, platforms and other third parties, across marketing ecosystems, says Tait.

However, they also need to be able to manage the various issues and opportunities across modern marketing communications including those around the digital supply chain including viewability and transparency in how they work with vendors but also more traditional disciplines including a zero-based budgeting approach to their media planning.

This idea of taking back control is not without its own issues however. Lastminute.com has its own in-house trading desk but admits ensuring internal teams have the right capabilities is a challenge, particularly because these skillsets are in high demand. That is why Alessandra Di Lorenzo, Lastminute.coms chief commercial officer for media and partnerships, believes investing in training and development is critical.

Upskilling existing employees is key to success, she says. For example a bright operations or trafficking expert can make a great audience buying manager.

By developing in-house expertise, brands will be better placed to understand how their budgets are being spend and drive greater transparency right up the supply chain. Likewise, marketers will become smarter about the tools they use to address ad fraud and unsafe content, she says.

As an advanced buyer we require visibility and control over where our spend is going. Our in-house trading desk is crucial to gaining this oversight helping us make substantial savings.

But with brands wanting to take more control where does this leave agencies and the ad tech players? Di Lorenzo believes media agencies can still add a lot of value, particularly for smaller brands and those that are not digitally native. However, she warns agencies that they will need to adapt their offering.

Its up to agencies to find new ways to deliver value to clients, she says.

For Innocent that value comes from partnering with agencies to help navigate the challenges. It is using agencies to help with the issues of fake views and bots, for example.

The WFAs Green also believes agencies will remain important, particularly at major brands that can afford to build in-house capabilities. However, he cautions that at some brand agencies are likely to play more of an execution role rather than be involved in strategy going forward.

By developing in-house expertise, brands will be better placed to understand how their budgets are being spend and drive greater transparency right up the supply chain.

I still think agencies have a strong role to play in planning and buying and most clients agree with that. They will need agencies, not least if theyre a global advertiser because there is a need for external resources if you are selling all over the world. But those roles and responsibilities can move around and agencies may shrink they could be reduced to execution only. But in most cases there is a role for agencies, he says.

He also expects to see a shakedown in the ad tech world because as clients bring in internal expertise and education side improves, brands will be in a better position to exert contractual control and work out exactly what they want.

What is encouraging is that marketers and brands see the challenges and are making changes to deal with them. What that solution looks like will of course vary for different brands but as long as the end result is more efficient and effective digital marketing spend, the route does not matter.

Transparency in the digital advertising world means ensuring that advertisers know exactly where ads are being placed and how much its costing them. As advertisers and brands get more savvy about buying media, the whole industry will have to move towards greater transparency whether thats opening a more honest dialogue with agencies, hiring media directors to oversee relationships, or building their own in-house resources, concludes Di Lorenzo.

View original post here:
Does the brand crackdown on media transparency go far enough? - Marketing Week

HBO regains control of hacked social media accounts | | nrtoday.com – NRToday.com

NEW YORK (AP) HBO says it has regained control of its social media accounts after the latest security breach to hit the entertainment company.

The hacking group OurMine on Wednesday night took over several of HBOs Twitter accounts, including ones for Game of Thrones and John Olivers show. The group posted that we are just testing your security and asked HBO to contact it for an upgrade.

HBO said in a statement Thursday that the infringement on our social media accounts was recognized and rectified quickly. It declined further comment.

OurMine has a history of similar hacks showing companies security vulnerabilities.

It caused far less damage and appeared unrelated to another group of hackers who broke into HBOs computer network and have been doling out stolen information and unaired episodes for several weeks.

Read the original here:
HBO regains control of hacked social media accounts | | nrtoday.com - NRToday.com

Govt will not control media: PM Deuba – Capital – The Kathmandu Post – The Kathmandu Post

Aug 20, 2017-

Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba said that the government would not control the media.

Inaugurating the 25th general assembly of Federation of Nepali Journalists (FNJ) in the Capital on Sunday, PM Deuba said that the government is committed to help the media sector.

The government will not hold back media under any circumstances, he said.

I think it is hard to run media sector as there are lots of publications in the country, PM Deuba, who is also the President of ruling Nepali Congress, said.

Saying that the media has played an instrumental role for democracy and republic, he said that media and political parties should move together to take the country towards the path of prosperty.

Moreover, PM Deuba said that the media can ensure stability in democracy by suggesting, warning and criticising the political parties.

Information and Communications Minister Mohan Bahadur Basnet and FNJ Chairman Mahendra Bista were present in the programme.

The closed session of FNJ will start from today itself and the voting will begin from Monday, FNJ Chairman Bista informed.

Tirtha Koirala, Govinda Acharya and Ujir Magar are vying for the top post of FNJ.

Published: 20-08-2017 13:21

View post:
Govt will not control media: PM Deuba - Capital - The Kathmandu Post - The Kathmandu Post

Twisting media’s arm will backfire – Bangkok Post

Lt Gen Sansern Kaewkamnerd, chief and propaganda and information for the junta. He has 'requested cooperation' in providing puffery and flattering news coverage of cabinet ministers, who control licences and some revenue streams from the TV stations.

The Prayut Chan-o-cha government is back in the eye of the storm for all for the wrong reasons. This time all eyes are on the mobile cabinet meeting set to take place tomorrow and Tuesday in Nakhon Ratchasima after government spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd openly admitted that he had "requested" television stations to do "scoops" focusing on ministers attending the meeting.

Lt Gen Sansern, who is also chief of the Public Relations Department, defended his cooperation request by saying that each TV station has its strengths and the government wanted stations to do scoops in areas where they are strong. For example, if TV stations are strong on social issues, they should follow ministers who are responsible for that aspect.

Although one can forgive Lt Gen Sansern for his good intentions towards the government, notwithstanding the fact that it could be construed as media intimidation, the execution of this process was flawed from the start.

Umesh Pandey is Editor, Bangkok Post.

The complete list of which stations were contacted is not yet known, but a list obtained by the Bangkok Post showed that 16 television stations had agreed to the request. Channel 3, 5, 7, MCOT, Thai PBS, Channel 8, Mono 29, TNN, New 18 TV, True4U, One, GMM 25, Nation TV, Thai Rath TV, NBT and NBT World registered to do exclusives on 18 topics.

If one was wondering whether the people in charge of seeking cooperation had specific TV stations in mind or was it random, well, these people had not done their homework because they contacted my staff to figure out if the Bangkok Post has a TV station. These officials were not aware that the Bangkok Post was lucky not to win the digital television bidding war that has become the cause of pain for the entire industry.

With broadcast media suffering, it is understandable that any request for cooperation from those who hold the key to licence payments and advertising revenue from the government's budget would lead to reluctant agreement from TV stations.

Most of the broadcast media houses are facing mounting losses and many are on the brink of going belly up, while some have already given up their hopes of revival. Therefore, such requests for cooperation usually end up being accepted and camouflaged as news coverage.

These kinds of requests come from both military and civilian governments. There have been some extreme cases in the past when cooperation requests did not work. In the early 2000s the Bangkok Post became a target for doing its job and reports emerged that then prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra through his proxies wanted to take control of the company in order to control the newspaper's content.

The takeover battle failed and the integrity of our publication remained intact, but how one wades through these requests is the job of the editor of each media house.

There are many countries that have buckled under the pressure of companies or families that own media outlets, but others have managed to maintain their integrity and dignity and become immensely successful even as social media threatens to kill this industry.

In today's world where readers' and viewers' attention spans are so short that one needs to rethink ways of presenting news to the public, selling your soul to either the government or advertisers is only going to kill the industry at a faster pace. Kneeling to pressure from these requests will only diminish the trust and faith that readers and viewers have of that media house, and therefore speed up their decline.

Those requesting cooperation should also realise that the trend of news consumption is changing. The media outlets they are trying to influence are the only ones that require government licences to operate, and at times they may heed requests, but there is a much bigger world of news outlets on the internet that is totally beyond their control. The government has been trying to rein in those outlets for years but has been unsuccessful.

It is therefore best to let the traditional media houses do their job and not try to control their work or else the government will become part of the reason for their demise.

Traditional media houses struggling to find their right place in the new media landscape should also realise that their acceptance of requests for cooperation by the likes of Lt Gen Sansern or advertisers could be the final nail in their coffin.

More:
Twisting media's arm will backfire - Bangkok Post