Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

In a Syria Refuge, Extremists Exert Greater Control – New York Times

Western powers like the United States that would like to fight the extremists in Idlib are leery of endangering civilians and have invested heavily in local groups that oppose the jihadists.

The Syrian government and its allies, however, say Idlib is little more than a terrorist haven, where jihadists have imposed their control a view some American officials share.

Idlib Province is the largest Al Qaeda safe haven since 9/11, Brett H. McGurk, the United States envoy to the coalition fighting the Islamic State, said last month. Idlib now is a huge problem.

Aid workers and residents say the situation there is more complicated, with a patchwork of groups struggling to provide necessary services to the civilians from all over Syria who have been bused to Idlib to live out the war. Though the extremist groups are militarily strong and the civilians have protested their presence, the militants have not systematically interfered with aid at least not yet.

Most people are thinking about the future, and theyre afraid of it, said Nour Awwad, a media coordinator for Violet Organization, which works in Idlib. But even if theyre afraid, where can they go?

Much of Idilb, a poor, mostly rural province along the border with Turkey, joined the uprising against Mr. Assad in 2011, and armed rebel groups and Islamist militias soon formed.

For years, the United States and its allies sent covert aid to rebels, including many in the north, to fight Syrian government forces a program that President Trump recently ended. Critics have charged that though the aid went to so-called moderate rebels, jihadists also benefited because they fought alongside the rebels and sometimes bought their weapons.

Elsewhere in Syria, the government was besieging opposition communities until they submitted, with the last rebels and civilians often bused to Idlib. This month, a few thousands refugees were sent from Lebanon to Idlib in a deal between Hezbollah, the Shiite militia that supports the Assad government, and the Levant Liberation Committee, the Al Qaeda affiliate formerly known as the Nusra Front.

The provinces population has swelled to two million, with nearly half those people displaced from elsewhere, the United Nations said.

That many needy people in one place has led to a large aid operation, with scores of groups sending food and other supplies across the border from Turkey, and establishing medical facilities and other projects in Idlib.

The future of those projects was thrown into doubt last month when clashes between the areas armed groups left the Levant Liberation Committee as the dominant force. Though the group changed its name last year and said it had broken its ties with Al Qaeda, American officials dismissed the claim as propaganda.

They still consider the group to be a dangerous terrorist organization, as does Turkey, which has restricted the passage of commercial goods across its border, fearing that they would benefit the jihadists.

The border crossing where most of the provinces aid and commercial goods pass has long been a moneymaker for whoever controls it, and it appears that the jihadists are in a position to do so now.

Aid groups say they have not been forced to pay, presumably because the jihadists know that such demands would halt aid that people need. The jihadists have said they will create a civilian body to govern the province, but it remains unclear when that could occur or what such a body would look like.

Violence inside the province continues. On Saturday, seven members of the Syrian Civil Defense, a group also known as the White Helmets who dig people out of rubble after airstrikes, were shot dead in their office in Idlib by unknown attackers, the group said on Twitter.

The recent infighting between armed groups in Idlib has threatened the provinces economy, which residents said had been improving. Though no official cease-fire covers the area, it has been spared from Syrian and Russian airstrikes in recent months.

During the relative respite, business has taken off, with locals constructing new buildings and opening car dealerships and small factories. A Turkish aid group even opened a mall, where needy families shop with vouchers.

Some residents see Idlib as the last stand of the anti-Assad uprising and the start of a new Syrian society. Thousands of people in one town, Saraqib, participated in local elections last month, and the president of Idlib University was voted out of office recently something the faculty noted had never happened to Syrias president.

It is like a phobia, said Wissam Zarqa, an English teacher. We dont want anyone to stay as president for a long time.

But as the rebels foreign backers, including the United States, have cut their support, the Assad government, backed by Russia and Iran, is expanding its control. At some point, most expect, the fight will come to Idlib.

We are just going from one tragedy to a bigger tragedy, said Muhammad Jaffa, an engineer who helps resettle displaced people. They are sending everyone here and we dont know what will happen to them in the end.

Should new violence erupt, civilians have few options. Many fear arrest or conscription if they return to government areas, and Turkey has closed its border, where guards shoot and sometimes kill people sneaking across.

Ali al-Juma, a doctor who fled to Idlib from his home farther south, said he again feels trapped.

It is now living in a minefield on the edge of another minefield, he said.

Hwaida Saad and Nada Homsi contributed reporting from Beirut, and Karam Shoumali from Istanbul.

A version of this article appears in print on August 14, 2017, on Page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: Qaeda-Linked Militants Are Finding Elbow Room Among Syrias Displaced.

See the original post:
In a Syria Refuge, Extremists Exert Greater Control - New York Times

Now, China to control local social media content – WION

China is investigating its top social media sites, including WeChat and Weibo, for failing to comply with cyber laws, the latest step in the country's push to secure the internet and maintain strict Communist Party control over content.

President Xi Jinping has made China's "cyber sovereignty" a top priority and has also reasserted the ruling party's role in limiting and guiding online discussion. Surveillance is being further tightened ahead of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party later this year, when global attention will be on news coming from the world's No.2 economy.

Apart from Tencent Holdings Group WeChat and Weibo, China's Cyberspace Administration said it was also investigating Baidu forum site Tieba over failing to comply with strict new laws that ban content which is obscene, violent and deemed offensive by the Communist Party.

"Users are spreading violence, terror, false rumours, pornography and other hazards to national security, public safety, social order," the regulator said on its website.

Baidu said it felt "deep regret" over the content and will "actively cooperate with government departments to rectify the issue and increase the intensity of auditing".

Tencent and Weibo did not respond to requests for comment.

Shares of the Hong Kong-listed firm were in the red after the news, down almost 5 per cent. Investors will now be waiting to see how shares of the US listed firms react.

Just last month, all three were asked to carry out immediate "cleaning and rectification" at a meeting with authorities who cited examples of illicit content, including rumours about party officials and misrepresenting Chinese military history.

Prior to the meeting, Weibo was asked to partly close its video site over violations, wiping out a total $1.3 billion worth of stock between Weibo and parent firm Sina.

In recent months, regulators have taken severe and unprecedented moves to shutter content and media across a variety of platforms. In May, it released regulations for online news sites and network portals that expanded curbs on content and required all services to be overseen by party-sanctioned editorial staff.

It has taken down popular celebrity gossip social media accounts and there has also been a sweeping campaign to remove virtual private network apps that allow users to circumvent China's so-called 'Great Firewall' and access foreign websites.

Western social media websites like Facebook and Twitter are banned by the country's censors, which in turn has helped drive up the popularity of home-grown messaging app WeChat and microblogging service Weibo.

WeChat and Weibo have about 940 million and 350 million monthly active users, respectively.

View original post here:
Now, China to control local social media content - WION

Russia says Syrian government doubled territory it controls – ABC News

The Syrian government has increased the size of the territory under its control by 2 ? times in just two months, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said Sunday, as Syrian forces backed by regional allies and the Russian air force seized thousands of square miles (kilometers) from the Islamic State group in the center of the country.

Syrian government forces supported by Iranian-organized militias and the Russian air force have recaptured much of the country's central Homs province from the Islamic State group in 2017. Most of the province is desert. It contains several energy fields as well as phosphate minerals.

They are driving toward the city of Deir el-Zour, kept under siege by IS militants since 2015.

Shoigu, in an interview on Russian state-owned Rossiya 24 TV, said recapturing Deir el-Zour "will say a lot, if not everything, about the end of the battle with" the Islamic State group.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group reported Sunday that government forces killed at least 25 IS militants in a commando operation in the desert region. It said the soldiers rappelled down from helicopters to ambush the militants, under the cover of Russian air strikes.

Russia has provided air support for Syrian forces combating rebels and the Islamic State group since 2015.

Elsewhere, a rebel faction said it killed 20 army soldiers outside the Syrian capital in a tunnel blast as the battle for Damascus's northeastern suburbs showed no signs of letting up.

Wael Olwan, spokesman for the Failaq al-Rahman faction, said the operation took place before dawn Sunday.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said 16 soldiers were reported missing because of the blast.

A Russian mediated cease-fire announced last month has failed to quell the fighting between the government and rebels on the northeastern edges of Damascus. The Failaq al-Rahman opposition faction says it is not party to the agreement, and the government says it is fighting terrorists.

The government has leaned on its air force and its ground-to-ground missile systems to push rebels out and away from the capital. Several neighborhoods and towns have been destroyed. The opposition does not have an air force.

Also Sunday, the al-Qaida-linked Hay'at Tahrir al Sham Arabic for Levant Liberation Committee, and also known as HTS said through its Ibaa' news agency that it had secured the release of 104 prisoners, among them 24 women, from government jails. It said the release was negotiated as part of an agreement for the HTS to give up its positions in the Qalamoun Mountains, near Damascus, next month. The Observatory said HTS released several of its own prisoners in exchange. They included soldiers and pro-government fighters.

Read the original:
Russia says Syrian government doubled territory it controls - ABC News

Government denies reports that the police are using excessive force to control protests – The Standard

By Standard Reporter | Published Sat, August 12th 2017 at 14:22, Updated August 12th 2017 at 16:44 GMT +3

Acting Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiangi has denied reports of police using excessive force to control protests that broke out Saturday night after President Uhuru Kenyatta was declared winner.

Matiang said the country is calm except some parts of Mathare, Kibera and Kisumu where protests are being held and the police have responded to restore peace.

The Government will stop at nothing short of protectingthe lives of Kenyans and their property and [we] warn any person that may have criminal intent that they will face the full force of the law, Matiang said during a press briefing in Nairobi.

He added that the protests are being fanned by false social media posts and the Government is on high alert and anybody found spreading propaganda on social media will be arrested.

There has been an increase in a number of false and inflammatory messages being spread on social media platforms, we have laws that govern against abuse of social media and the Government will not hesitate to take action against culprits, he said.

He said demonstrations are allowed by lawbut they must be peaceful, without posing a threat to life or property.

Matiang' urged both local and international media to exercise their duty responsibly, to inform accurately without fanning violence.

ALSO READ: Stray police bullet kills girl in Mathare North area

There have been unconfirmed reports that several people have been injured and others killed in demonstrations in some parts of the country.

Continue reading here:
Government denies reports that the police are using excessive force to control protests - The Standard

How the NRA Manipulates Gun Owners and the Media – The New Yorker

In early April, the National Rifle Association published to YouTube and its video hub, NRATV, a lacerating monologue about the New York Times. Dana Loesch, a conservative commentator who had recently become a national spokeswoman for the association, speaks directly into the camera. We the people have had it, Loesch says. Weve had it with your narratives, your propaganda, your fake news. Weve had it with your constant protection of your Democrat overlords, your refusal to acknowledge any truth that upsets the fragile construct that you believe is real life. And weve had it with your pretentious, tone-deaf assertion that you are in any way truth or fact-based journalism.

Loeschwho once ran a popular motherhood blog, Mamalogues, before becoming a newspaper columnist, radio personality, and then Tea Party activistalternately sneers and smirks, relishing her takedown. She warns that the Times should consider this the shot across your proverbial bow, flings a few more epithets at the newspaperold gray hag, untrustworthy, dishonest ragand ends the video with a declaration: Were coming for you. The three-minute-and-fifty-seven-second episode, part of a Commentators video series sponsored by the gun manufacturer Kimber, attracted relatively little attention when it first went up. Another video the N.R.A. posted just over a month earlier, challenging the Times The Truth Is Hard television ad during the Academy Awards, had similarly struggled to gain traction. But, last week, NRATV shared a trimmed-down version of Loeschs video on Facebook and Twitter . @DLoesch has a message for the @nytimes: Were coming for you, the tweet said, followed by the hashtag #ClenchedFistofTruth.

An axiom of digital video strategy nowadays is that different types of videos are better suited for different platforms. This particular segment, it turned out, worked well for social media, attracting, as of late this week, a hundred and twenty-three thousand views on Facebook, along with fourteen hundred retweets and more than twenty-four hundred likes on Twitter. Loeschs vigorous social-media jousting with detractors, who thought shed threatened at one point in the video to fist the Times , helped boost traffic. (Loesch insistedand the transcript accompanying her video on NRATV supports her casethat she had said fisk, a slang term, popular among bloggers in the two-thousands, that refers to a point-by-point rebuttal.) Perhaps most important for the N.R.A.s communications shop, the video garnered an avalanche of earned mediawriteups in the Guardian , Slate, USA Today , Newsweek , Vice , Salon, and elsewhere.

Over the past few months, the N.R.A. has released a succession of Web videos, all strikingly bellicose even by the standards of the association. Theyre also notable for how far they seem to veer from the N.R.A.s ostensible priority, defending gun rights. In early April, NRATV published a video that featured images of the Times headquarters and interspersed footage of violent protesters with commentary from Loeschcoiled and urgentaccusing the left of inciting people to smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law-abiding, until the only option left is for the police to do their jobs and stop the madness. Biting off each word and brimming with derision, Loesch says, The only way to stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom, is to fight this violence of lies with the clenched fist of truth.

In another video, posted in July, Dom Raso, a barrel-chested former Navy SEAL and NRATV contributor, declared that the country had fallen into organized anarchy, led by people who hate our President and who hate the people who support him. After a Washington Post article commented that Rasos dark video had failed to even mention guns, the N.R.A. went after the Post . Grant Stinchfield, another pugnacious NRATV personality, accused the Post of fomenting the organized anarchy of the violent left and promised that the N.R.A. would never stop fighting the violent left on the battlefield of truth. Stinchfield kept up his assault this week, lashing out at two reporters, Adam Goldman of the Times and Dave Weigel of the Post , who had expressed consternation at the Loesch ad on Twitter.

For several years, I worked on investigations at the Times on gaps in gun laws and the influence of the gun lobby. They were often highly critical stories, examining the N.R.A.s efforts to stymie firearms research , its lobbying to make it easier for people with a histories of mental illness to have their gun rights restored , and its work blocking legislation that would make it harder for domestic abusers to keep their guns. Yet, through all of this, I cant recall the N.R.A. going after the Times or me, for that matterin such a direct way. (I did once have my photo posted on a Web site called Ammoland.com.)

I called Richard Feldman, a former N.R.A. lobbyist, to help me understand the organizations latest tack and why the gun lobby would stray from its focus on the Second Amendment. In 2007, Feldman published Ricochet: Confessions of a Gun Lobbyist, a memoir of his time working for the association. In the book, Feldman wrote about his gradual realization that the associations aims and those of gun owners did not always align, and that wielding power and wringing contributions from members sometimes overshadow protecting Constitutional liberties. The N.R.A. is certainly at a crest in power today, with Republicans in control of Congress and Trump in the White House. The gun lobby was an early endorser of Trump and spent more than thirty million dollars, more than any other outside group, to get him elected. In April, at the N.R.A.s leadership forum in Atlanta, Trump became the first sitting President since Ronald Reagan to address the association.

Feldman told me that this kind of political success can actually be problematic for the N.R.A. The N.R.A. is not so much interested in winning, Feldman told me. Theyre interested in fighting, because fighting is great for fund-raising and membership recruitment.

Hillary Clinton in the White House, with her support for tougher gun laws, would have been a boon for the N.R.A. Trumps surprise election meant the association needed to recalibrate, and quickly. Philip Bump, a writer for the Washington Post , published a chart last week that tracked the N.R.A.s paid Twitter ads since November, 2016, and the mentions of the terms left, violence, and media (and including the Twitter handles of the Washington Post or the Times ). The spike is startling and revealing about the way the N.R.A. has decided to adjust its customer-acquisition strategy, aping the angry rhetoric of the candidate it championed. And the ensuing media outrage over the videos only fuels the virtuous cycle for the N.R.A.

It is, of course, perfectly within the prerogative of an advocacy group to stir anxiety and fear among its members or potential members for the sake of attracting donations. But gun owners, contemplating whether to re-up their forty-dollar annual memberships or hand over their credit cards for the first time, might consider the fact that theyre being manipulated. And for those (rightly) outraged by the intimations of violence in the videos, it is worth weighing the reality that were part of the N.R.A.s strategy, too.

Visit link:
How the NRA Manipulates Gun Owners and the Media - The New Yorker