Mediaboss Marketing

a service layer in IEEE 802 network standards

In IEEE 802 LAN/MAN standards, the medium access control (MAC) sublayer (also known as the media access control sublayer) and the logical link control (LLC) sublayer together make up the data link layer. Within that data link layer, the LLC provides flow control and multiplexing for the logical link (i.e. EtherType, 802.1Q VLAN tag etc), while the MAC provides flow control and multiplexing for the transmission medium.

These two sublayers together correspond to layer 2 of the OSI model. For compatibility reasons, LLC is optional for implementations of IEEE 802.3 (the frames are then "raw"), but compulsory for implementations of all other IEEE 802 standards. Within the hierarchy of the OSI model and IEEE 802 standards, the MAC block provides a control abstraction of the physical layer such that the complexities of physical link control are invisible to the LLC and upper layers of the network stack. Thus any LLC block (and higher layers) may be used with any MAC. In turn, the medium access control block is formally connected to the PHY via a media-independent interface. Although the MAC block is today typically integrated with the PHY within the same device package, historically any MAC could be used with any PHY, independent of the transmission medium.

When sending data to another device on the network, the MAC block encapsulates higher-level frames into frames appropriate for the transmission medium (i.e. the MAC adds a syncword preamble and also padding if necessary), adds a frame check sequence to identify transmission errors, and then forwards the data to the physical layer as soon as the appropriate channel access method permits it. Controlling when data is sent and when to wait is necessary to avoid congestion and collisions, especially for topologies with a collision domain (bus, ring, mesh, point-to-multipoint topologies). Additionally, the MAC is also responsible for compensating for congestion and collisions by initiating retransmission if a jam signal is detected, and/or negotiating a slower transmission rate if necessary. When receiving data from the physical layer, the MAC block ensures data integrity by verifying the sender's frame check sequences, and strips off the sender's preamble and padding before passing the data up to the higher layers.

According to IEEE Std 802-2001 section 6.2.3 "MAC sublayer", the primary functions performed by the MAC layer are:[1]

In the case of Ethernet, according to 802.3-2002 section 4.1.4, the functions required of a MAC are:[2]

The local network addresses used in IEEE 802 networks and FDDI networks are called media access control addresses; they are based on the addressing scheme that was used in early Ethernet implementations. A MAC address is intended as a unique serial number. MAC addresses are typically assigned to network interface hardware at the time of manufacture. The most significant part of the address identifies the manufacturer, who assigns the remainder of the address, thus provide a potentially unique address. This makes it possible for frames to be delivered on a network link that interconnects hosts by some combination of repeaters, hubs, bridges and switches, but not by network layer routers. Thus, for example, when an IP packet reaches its destination (sub)network, the destination IP address (a layer 3 or network layer concept) is resolved with the Address Resolution Protocol for IPv4, or by Neighbor Discovery Protocol (IPv6) into the MAC address (a layer 2 concept) of the destination host.

Examples of physical networks are Ethernet networks and Wi-Fi networks, both of which are IEEE 802 networks and use IEEE 802 48-bit MAC addresses.

A MAC layer is not required in full-duplex point-to-point communication, but address fields are included in some point-to-point protocols for compatibility reasons.

The channel access control mechanisms provided by the MAC layer are also known as a multiple access protocol. This makes it possible for several stations connected to the same physical medium to share it. Examples of shared physical media are bus networks, ring networks, hub networks, wireless networks and half-duplex point-to-point links. The multiple access protocol may detect or avoid data packet collisions if a packet mode contention based channel access method is used, or reserve resources to establish a logical channel if a circuit-switched or channelization-based channel access method is used. The channel access control mechanism relies on a physical layer multiplex scheme.

The most widespread multiple access protocol is the contention based CSMA/CD protocol used in Ethernet networks. This mechanism is only utilized within a network collision domain, for example an Ethernet bus network or a hub-based star topology network. An Ethernet network may be divided into several collision domains, interconnected by bridges and switches.

A multiple access protocol is not required in a switched full-duplex network, such as today's switched Ethernet networks, but is often available in the equipment for compatibility reasons.

Use of directional antennas and millimeter-wave communication in a wireless personal area network increases the probability of concurrent scheduling of noninterfering transmissions in a localized area, which results in an immense increase in network throughput. However, the optimum scheduling of concurrent transmission is an NP-hard problem.[3]

Cellular networks, such as GSM, UMTS or LTE networks, also use a MAC layer. The MAC protocol in cellular networks is designed to maximize the utilization of the expensive licensed spectrum. [4]The air interface of a cellular network is at layers 1 and 2 of the OSI model; at layer 2, it is divided into multiple protocol layers.In UMTS and LTE, those protocols are the Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP), the Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol, and the MAC protocol.The base station has the absolute control over the air interface and schedules the downlink access as well as the uplink access of all devices. The MAC protocol is specified by 3GPP in TS 25.321[5] for UMTS, TS 36.321[6] for LTE and TS 38.321[7] for 5G New Radio (NR).

Follow this link:
Medium access control - Wikipedia

Courtesy of The Other 98%, with over 33,000 likes and 13,000 shares. This is a popular meme repeated over the last several years. Depending on the meme, its six corporations, or sometimes only five that supposedly control 90% of our media content. This is claim is generally used to create a feeling of paranoia, which gets exploited politically for calls to further regulate media companies. However, when this claim is analyzed, its dubious at best.

Where Does This Stat Come From?

Its quoted all over the place, sometimes even in respected outlets, but its origins are difficult to track down. The most popular claim is this: In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by fifty companies; today, 90% is controlled by just six companies.

This is even quoted verbatim on the Wikipedia page about media cross-ownership, but the source for this quote, cited on the bottom of the page, is troublesome. It brings us to a Business Insider blog post, which is not an original source, or even reliable. In fact, the source used in the blog post isa meme!

This is a portion of the meme that Wikipedia and Business Insider used as a source!

Yes, a meme that went viral in 2011 put out by a blog called Frugal Dad. The blog seems well-intentioned, but hardly a reliable source. It does list some websites on the bottom of the meme, but none of them seem particularly reliable or relevant to this statistic. In other words, most of the web uses Frugal Dad as the source for this statistic!

After much searching, it seems the original source for this claim comes from the book, The Media Monopoly (later revised to The New Media Monopoly in 2004) by Ben Bagdikian. He was a fairly respected journalist, although clearly left-wing and biased against large corporations. The book is similarly slanted, and while he has credible sources for some claims in it, there is no source or footnote given for his claim that the Big Five control the media, or 90% of it (see for yourself). The original source seems to be the opinion of Mr. Bagdikian! An informed opinion, perhaps, but not one based on a scholarly study of how and who Americans get their news from, or other objective means. Furthermore, its more than 10 years old, and a lot has changed.

Its under this dubious source that we are warranted to continue our investigation of this meme.

The Big Six Claim

Bagdikian called it the Big Five in his 2004 book, claiming Time Warner, Disney, News Corporation, Viacom and Bertelsmann (from Germany) controlled our media. This has morphed into the Big Six, as time and ownership has changed. These are the companies supposedly controlling almost everything in the US media.

These six companies clearly own a lot of media, but is it really 90%? And what happened to Bertelsmann? They still exist, but apparently disappeared from influence in a few years? For the purpose of this analysis, well focus on news media, as thats what most would consider important (who cares who owns Marvel or the Weather Channel?).

Other Major Outlets

Heres just a partial list of influential news sources not owned by these six corporations.

This doesnt include the other large foreign news agencies like BBC, Al Jazeera, etc. or many smaller US outlets like Newsweek, Politico, The Atlantic, The New Yorker and countless others. When looking at this partial list of media sources, it not only seems dubious that 90% is controlled by the Big Six, but downright laughable. In fact, it seems plausible the Big Six might control less than half of media content. Considering this statistic is not reliably sourced (or sourced at all), it should not be considered credible.

Comparisons to Other Industries

Even if there were only six companies controlling 90%, would this be a problem? Lets look at some other industries.

Clearly, we can have vibrant, competitive markets delivering great products where a few players control the majority of it. Often, big companies can do things better, or mergers can make things more efficient. In the case of news media, it takes a significant amount of resources to create an infrastructure that can investigate and report on all the news. Given this, it wouldnt be surprising that it would become dominated by a small number of companies, but even so this seems not to be the case, as the news media has many more competitors than most other industries.

This isnt to say that there arent problems, biases, agendas or group-think going on in the media. There likely are, but its doubtful that its due to the Big Six or deregulation. For example, it might have more to do with outlets being lazy and not vetting sources correctly, leaving it to the Meme Policeman to do for free!

In fact, access to different views and unique styles of reporting are more prevalent than ever. There are blogs, news sites, social media pages and videos from every perspective imaginable available on the internet. It used to be almost impossible for these voices to get into the media, as they would need to own either a newspaper, magazine or TV/Radio station. Ironically, viewers were much more limited in the past, when so many tuned into Walter Cronkite on the CBS evening news. Now, its possible for anyone to have a voice, or to report the news with a blog or Youtube channel. Whether or not its listened to, or trusted, is a decision rightly made by the market.

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders

As for the supposed lack of coverage for Bernie, its doubtful anyone who follows the news hasnt heard plenty about him. Go to any major media source, and youll find coverage of his campagin. While The Other 98% might lament about the nonstop coverage of Donald Trump, one needs to go no further than their own Facebook page (which has over 2 million followers) to see this obsessive coverage in action. If this is happening even from a non-profit liberal opinion site, the intense coverage probably has other origins than a corporate conspiracy.

Original post:
Do 6 Corporations Control 90% of the Media- The Meme Policeman

The folks over at the Media Research Center, which tracks left-wing media bias, had some fun with the latest episode of "Good Morning America," in which the GMA team did their best to do some "damage control" over the "softball" interview of actor/singer Jussie Smollett by anchor Robin Roberts over the alleged "hate crime" attack against him an incident attack law enforcement sources say evidence increasingly suggests may have been orchestrated by the actor himself. GMA's spin comes as multiple high-profile media personalities, including CNN's Brian Stelter, are attempting to defend the media's handling of the case.

After refusing to qualify the January 29 "hate crime" attack against Smollett as "alleged" last week, Roberts was finally willing to apply the journalistically responsible descriptor Monday morning after "a new twist" in the case, as she put it euphemistically.

"A new twist in the Jussie Smollett case," Roberts said Monday, MRC reports. "The actor firing back this morning as the story of his alleged attack faces questions." Roberts then revealed the bombshell that dropped Saturday from multiple oultets, including CBS News: "Police in Chicago say they're working to corroborate allegations that Smollett paid two men to stage the assault," said the anchor.

"When I sat down with Jussie, it was Tuesday night in Chicago," she explained, her tone a bit defensive (video below). "At the time to give his first account, publicly give his first account, of what he said happened. And we have to remember, at that time, on Tuesday, police officers were saying that his account was consistent. It was credible. And that he was being cooperative. Now this was all before the interview aired on Thursday and then we found out about the brothers."

She went on to acknowledge that sometimes police say one thing publicly and another behind the scenes.

In her interview and follow-up reporting last week, Roberts repeatedly refused to qualify his claims, as MRC pointed out last week: "If the attackers are never found, how will you be able to heal?" she asked him. "It's been two weeks since that night left actor Jussie Smollett bruised but not broken," she said, again failing to qualify the language. "That's the first time he's given a detailed account, an account that Chicago police have saids that been consistent," she stressed after her interview. "He hasn't changed his story and they also said it's credible. The police have said that and also that he's been very cooperative."

As MRC points out, her fellow media personalities were ready to come to her defense Monday, ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams praising her for her what he portrayed as a fair and balanced interview. "[E]ven in the interview you did, you were talking about the skeptics. You were talking about the people who questioned his account," he said, failing to note the dismissive attitude about those "skeptics" promoted by the network and other mainstream outlets. "So, it's not new this idea that there are questions about what happened. What's new is that the police now seem to be making it clear that they believe the brothers and have, at the very least, serious questions about Jussie."

The panel went on to discuss the potential negative impact on real victims of hate crimes if this whole thing turns out to be a hoax, but notably failed to mention the smear of Trump supporters involved in the initial narrative promoted largely unquestioningly by the media.

Video below via MRC:

Another Smollett coverage damage control effort by a big name media personality has been pointed out by Grabien Media Editor Tom Elliott and Mediate writer Julia Rosas (h/t Twitchy): While CNN's Brian Stelter has admitted that "perhaps the questioning was not tough enough on Good Morning America," he insists that this is ultimately not about the media.

"Perhaps the questioning was not tough enough on Good Morning America, but ultimately this is not about the media or politicians or activists, or any of the other people that might have been fooled," Stelter said after the bombshell reports on the "new twist" in the case Saturday. "It's about Jussie."

"There was a rush to judgment, I think it was mostly in the celebrity press and among activists and among Twitter people," Stelter asserted. "I think it was a really careful reporting by news organizations. But it all gets lumped in together at the end of the day."

WATCH:

Related: Smollett Updates: Latest Developments In Case Look Increasingly Bad For Actor

Read this article:
WATCH: Media Does Damage Control Over Its Smollett ...

The Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) is a signaling and call control communications protocol used in voice over IP (VoIP) telecommunication systems. It implements the media gateway control protocol architecture for controlling media gateways on Internet Protocol (IP) networks connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN).[1] The protocol is a successor to the Simple Gateway Control Protocol (SGCP), which was developed by Bellcore and Cisco, and the Internet Protocol Device Control (IPDC).[2]

The methodology of MGCP reflects the structure of the PSTN with the power of the network residing in a call control center softswitch which is analogous to the central office in the telephone network. The endpoints are low-intelligence devices, mostly executing control commands from a call agent or media gateway controller in the softswitch and providing result indications in response. The protocol represents a decomposition of other VoIP models, such as H.323 and the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), in which the endpoint devices of a call have higher levels of signaling intelligence.

MGCP is a text-based protocol consisting of commands and responses. It uses the Session Description Protocol (SDP) for specifying and negotiating the media streams to be transmitted in a call session and the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) for framing the media streams.

The media gateway control protocol architecture and its methodologies and programming interfaces are described in RFC 2805.[1]

MGCP is a master-slave protocol in which media gateways (MGs) are controlled by a call control agent or softswitch. This controller is called a media gateway controller (MGC) or call agent (CA). With the network protocol it can control each specific port on a media gateway. This facilitates centralized gateway administration and provides scalable IP telephony solutions. The distributed system is composed of at least one call agent and one or usually, multiple media gateways, which performs the conversion of media signals between circuit-switched and packet-switched networks, and at least one signaling gateway (SG) when connected to the PSTN.

MGCP presents a call control architecture with limited intelligence at the edge (endpoints, media gateways) and intelligence at the core controllers. The MGCP model assumes that call agents synchronize with each other to send coherent commands and responses to the gateways under their control.

The call agent uses MGCP to request event notifications, reports, status, and configuration data from the media gateway, as well as to specify connection parameters and activation of signals toward the PSTN telephony interface.

A softswitch is typically used in conjunction with signaling gateways, for access to Signalling System No. 7 (SS7) functionality, for example. The call agent does not use MGCP to control a signaling gateway; rather, SIGTRAN protocols are used to backhaul signaling between a signaling gateway and the call agents.

Typically, a media gateway may be configured with a list of call agents from which it may accept control commands.

In principle, event notifications may be sent to different call agents for each endpoint on the gateway, according to the instructions received from the call agents by setting the NotifiedEntity parameter. In practice, however, it is usually desirable that all endpoints of a gateway are controlled by the same call agent; other call agents are available to provide redundancy in the event that the primary call agent fails, or loses contact with the media gateway. In the event of such a failure it is the backup call agent's responsibility to reconfigure the media gateway so that it reports to the backup call agent. The gateway may be audited to determine the controlling call agent, a query that may be used to resolve any conflicts.

In case of multiple call agents, MGCP assumes that they maintain knowledge of device state among themselves. Such failover features take into account both planned and unplanned outages.

MGCP recognizes three essential elements of communication, the media gateway controller (call agent), the media gateway endpoint, and connections between these entities. A media gateway may host multiple endpoints and each endpoint should be able to engage in multiple connections. Multiple connections on the endpoints support calling features such as call waiting and three-way calling.

MGCP is a text-based protocol using a command and response model. Commands and responses are encoded in messages that are structured and formatted with the whitespace characters space, horizontal tab, carriage return, linefeed, colon, and full stop. Messages are transmitted using the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Media gateways use the port number 2427, and call agents use 2727 by default.

The message sequence of command (or request) and its response is known as a transaction, which is identified by the numerical Transaction Identifier exchanged in each transaction. The protocol specification defines nine standard commands that are distinguished by a four-letter command verb: AUEP, AUCX, CRCX, DLCX, EPCF, MDCX, NTFY, RQNT, and RSIP. Responses begin with a three-digit numerical response code that identifies the outcome or result of the transaction.

Two verbs are used by a call agent to query the state of an endpoint and its associated connections.

Three verbs are used by a call agent to manage the connection to a media gateway endpoint.

One verb is used by a call agent to request notification of events occurring at the endpoint, and to apply signals to the connected PSTN network link, or to a connected telephony endpoint, e.g., a telephone.

One verb is used by an endpoint to indicate to the call agent that it has detected an event for which the call agent had previously requested notification with the RQNT command:

One verb is used by a call agent to modify coding characteristics expected by the line side of the endpoint:

One verb is used by an endpoint to indicate to the call agent that it is in the process of restarting:

Another implementation of the media gateway control protocol architecture is the H.248/Megaco protocol, a collaboration of the Internet Engineering Task Force (RFC 3525) and the International Telecommunication Union (Recommendation H.248.1). Both protocols follow the guidelines of the overlying media gateway control protocol architecture, as described in RFC 2805. However, the protocols are incompatible due to differences in protocol syntax and underlying connection model.

Read the original post:
Media Gateway Control Protocol - Wikipedia

How many times have we been accused of being conspiracy theorists, anti-Semitic bigots or whatever the excuse is? People dont want to believe that those evil Nazis were right from the start. Theyd rather believe our news media is made of objective and independent journalists who are only seeking for the truth behind events. How ridiculous this explanation might be, since the Mainstream Media have been revealed to be pathological liars time after time.

It is time to establish who are owning the media, who are leading the media, and who are influencing it. Therefore the major news media of the United States of America will be listed, including their respective Jewish influences.

The list:

Let us start withABC News

Its chairman is Ben Sherwood, its president is James Goldston. ABC News is owned by the American Broadcasting Company, which itself is owned by the Disney-ABC Television Group (Disney Media Networks and The Walt Disney Company combined). In the ABC Ben Sherwood and James Goldston are both president. Ben Sherwood is also president of ABC, Inc. (also known as the Disney-ABC Television Group). The Walt Disney Company is led by the Jew Robert Iger.

CBS News

While the gentile Joseph Ianniello is the acting President and CEO, David Rhodes is the President of CBS News. The CBS Corporation is the parent of CBS News, led by Strauss Zelnick. Its owner: National Amusements, the company of the media mogul Sumner Redstone (born. Sumner Rothstein)

CNN

One of the largest media in the US is led by Jeff Zucker, who is president of CNN Worldwide. CNN is owned by the Turner Broadcasting System, which was founded by the gentile Ted Turner, but has been taken over by our fellow whites David Levy and Gerhard Zeiler. Its parent: WarnerMedia, led by John Stankey, who is the CEO. Its parent is AT&T, whose chairman, CEO and president is the gentile Randall L. Stephenson. However, investigating the different departments of AT&T, the descendants of Moses are present, again. James Cicconi being the Senior Executive Vice President of External and Legislative Affairs, Ralph de la Vega being the President and CEO of AT&T Mobility, Andy Geisse being the CEO of AT&T Busines Solutions, John Stephens being the Senior Executive Vice President and CFO, Wayne Watts being the Senior Executive Vice President and General Counsel. While on the surface level, only a gentile face appears, when diving deep into the water, the iceberg becomes more kosher the further you swim. It is the same as the Hungarian Soviet Republic, where the leaders of the revolution took the gentile Garbai in, so they had someone to sign death sentences on shabbat (Mtys Rkosi, born. Rosenfeld).

Fox News

Owned, of course, by the gentile Rupert Murdoch, who is even more Zionist than most of the Jewish media moguls. The CEO of the Fox Entertainment Group is Charlie Collier, who probably is not Jewish. Fox News is not controlled by Jews, although rumors were spread that Murdochs mother was a crypto-Jew, being proved by the probably photoshopped picture of his mother being visited by an Orthodox Jewish rabbi.

MSNBC

Owned by NBCUniversal, which is led by vice chairman Ron Meyer and CEO Steve Burke. NBCUniversal is owned by Comcast, which is owned by the Roberts family, led by chairman and CEO Brian L. Roberts, SEVP and CFO Michael Cavanagh and EVP David L. Cohen.

NBC News

President and CEO is the aforementioned Steve Burke, who is of Irish descent. The President of NBC News is the Jew Noah Oppenheim, while the chairman of NBCUniversal Group is the Jew Andrew Lack. Being a division of the National Broadcasting Company, which is led by Bob Greenblatt. NBC is owned by Comcast, which is owned by the aforementioned Roberts family. MSNBC and NBC News have the same Jewish owner and the same Jewish leaders.

The New York Times

The largest newspaper of the United States can be rightfully nicknamed The Jew York Times. It is owned by the New York Times Company, and for 17% by the Mexican business magnate Carlos Slim (who is of Lebanese descent). The New York Times Company is owned by the Sulzberger family and led by Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr.. The New York Times itself is published by his son, Arthur Gregg Sulzberger. The New York Times are famous for its large amount of Jews wandering around in the offices of the newspaper. Its opinion editor is James Bennet. A separate article can be made to point out the Jewish influence, and basically, Jewish control over The New York Times, which was founded by Gentiles, but just like Disney, bought by Jews.

Los Angeles Times

Published by Ross Levinsohn, edited by Norman Pearlstine, owned by Nant Capital, which is led by the Chinese South-African Patrick Soon-Shiong, and it is also owned by Los Angeles Times Communications LLC. However, the Los Angeles Times Communcations LLC, which is also owned by Patrick Soon-Shiong, has the half-Jew Miyuki Rosen as its president, Ross Levinsohn as its CEO, and Nicholas Goldberg as its editor of the editorial pages.

USA Today

Published by Maribel Perez Wadsworth, edited by Nicole Carroll, and its president is John Zidich, whose background is dubious. Could be Jewish, could also be a Gentile. It is owned by the Gannett Company, which is led by John Jeffry Louis III and Robert J. Dickey.

The Wall Street Journal

Its editor is Matt Murray, while Paul A. Gigot is the opinion editor. Owned by News Corp and thus another Murdochian Zionist enterprise.

The Washington Post

Although is it now owned by Jeff Bezos, who clearly is not a Jew, it has always been a Jewish enterprise. Its publisher is Fred Ryan, and its editor is Martin Baron, with the managing editors Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, Cameron Barr, and Tracy Grant. Just as it is the case with The New York Times, many Jews are working within the ranks of The Washington Post.

Los Angeles Daily News

Published by Ron Hasse, edited by Frank Pine. Owned by Digital First Media, which is owned by Alden Global Capital, the hedge fund of Randal D. Smith, and led by Steve Rossi, Michael Koren, Guy Gilmore, Mac Tully and Sharon Ryan.

Bloomberg L.P.

Is there any reason to clarify this large media company? Of course there is, since there is no media company more Jewish than Bloomberg L.P. Owned and led by former mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, chaired by Peter Grauer.

Vice News

Founded by Suroosh Alvi, Shane Smith, and the rebranded far-right hate monger Gavin McInnes. It is led by Nancy Dubuc. Vice is owned by Shane Smith (20%), The Walt Disney Company, A&E Networks (with Abbe Raven as its CEO) , TPG Capital (David Bonderman), and the Christian Zionist Fox.

HBO

Owned by WarnerMedia, led by its CEO Richard Plepler, the President of HBO U.S. Group John K. Billock and President of HBO Programming Casey Bloys.

HuffPost

Created by Arianna Huffington (also the name giver), Kenneth Lerer, Jonah Peretti, and the late Andrew Breitbart (who also founded the far-right Breitbart News). Owned by Oath Inc., which is led by K. Guru Gowrappan (definitely not Jewish), which itself is part of Verizon Communications, which is led by Lowell McAdam and Hans Vestberg. Owned by AT&T Corporation, which has a clear Jewish influence in the top layer (see CNN).

TMZ

Created by Jim Paratore and Harvey Levin, the latter being the editor, owned by Warner Bros.

CNET

Created by Halsey Minor and Shelby Bonnie, edited by Lindsey Turretine and Connie Guglielmo. Owned by CBS Interactive, which is led by President Jim Lanzone. CBS itself, however, is owned by Sumner Redstone. While on the surface level only Italians appear, it is in Jewish hands.

Techmeme

Owned by Gabe Rivera. Definitely not Jewish.

NPR

Its CEO is Jarl Mohn, who, as we would expect from a media Jew, wants to diversify NPR. Of course. Owned by National Public Radio, Inc.

The Hollywood Reporter

Published by Lynne Segall, edited by Matthew Belloni, and owned by Eldridge Industries, which is owned by Todd Boehly and Anthony D. Minella

Newsweek

Its editor is Nancy Cooper, and its publisher is Dev Pragad. Newsweek is, contrary to most of the legacy media, independent. It used to be owned by IAC/InterActiveCorp which is the company of the Jew Sidney Harman

Time

The editor-in-chief of Time Magazine is Edward Felsenthal, and it is owned by Marc and Lynne Benioff.

U.S. News & World Report

Owned by the media mogul Mortimer Zuckerman, edited by Brian Kelly.

The Guardian

Although Jews seem absent on the surface level, when investigating the Scott Trust, which owns the Guardian Media Group, we again find some fellow whites. The editor of The Guardian itself is the British Jewess Katherine Viner. In the Scott Trust Board, we find:

Again, an astonishing overrepresentation of our greatest ally. Of course, who would have expected that?

Now, people will still come to us and call us anti-Semites for pointing the absolutely obvious thing out. Who can be blind for such an overrepresentation, I mean, control? This is the Mainstream Media, the major news media of the United States. These are the media that every American is influenced by. How can we, from this point on, deny that Jews have a major influence on Americans through the media, even that the media is controlled by them? No wonder the media, like The New York Times, always like to brag about old white male overrepresentation in the government and the media, but always somehow fail to discuss the real control and the real overrepresentation: namely the one of the media owners themselves. When will The New York Times ever address the fact that 2% of the population is in control of the majority of the American news media? They wont. The major film studios arent even discussed here, because doing that will probably lead to another Shoah.

CNN only got mad when they saw this picture, instead of actually addressing the issue forehand, namely the fact that these people, of course by a huge cohencidence, belong to the same (((tribe))).

The only ones allowed to talk about the Jewish control over our media, are, in fact, the Jews themselves!

Why is it so important to point out the Jewish control? Because everything you are being taught by the media is a Jewish redaction of the reality. Just like Wittgenstein spoke about the flower, the Jewish mind is only able to produce a picture of the flower. When this picture (in our case the news media) is mistaken for being the reality, there is a great danger. Liberals will still respond to the obvious that it doesnt matter from which ethnicity people are, but that we are all human beings, or they are pointing out the in-group conflicts between the liberal Jews of The New York Times and the Orthodox Jews like Ben Shapiro. The saying goes that when there are four Jews in a room, there are five opinions. When the goyim steps in, however, these different opinions disappear and suddenly the Jews form one front. Think about the way the Jews secured The Walt Disney Company for themselves. By collectivizing their actions to prevent a goyim entrepreneur from buying the company, they managed to get their fellow Jew Michael Eisner to buy it. Remember that, every time, you read an article from whatever mainstream news media there is, it is probably a Jewish redaction you are reading, and therefore it is poison for the mind. You dont need this middleman to tell you what is going on. Find the source by yourself and make up your own conclusions.

Never trust the media.

Never.

Trust.

The.

Media.

[wysija_form id="1"]

See more here:
Do (((They))) Control the Media? - renegadetribune.com