Mediaboss Marketing

Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago has urged students to be involved in social issues and use the power of social media to fight corruption and anomalies. Use the social media in educating each other and influencing other people. Getting involved in social issues will teach you not only to sympathize, but also to empathize with others, and to see their problems as your own, said Miriam in a speech on Media and Good Governance before hundreds of students of Assumption College in San Lorenzo Village, Makati City.

Because of the power of social media, Miriam said the 2016 presidential election may even be determined by it, and no longer by the amount of campaign funding allegedly running to P2 billion.

It is entirely possible that the 2016 presidential and senatorial elections will be determined by social media, said the senator, who is frequently trending in social media.

Miriam, who ran for President in 1992 and whose presidential election protest was never resolved, predicted that because of the Internet and cable TV, there will be less rallies and motorcades.

The crooked candidates are already hiring professionals to dominate and maybe even control the social media. But such is the power of social media that netizens will be able to beat the candidates with unexplained wealth and their criminal campaign contributors, Miriam said.

But while the youth continues to fight, Miriam said candidates with immoral wealth and criminal campaign contributors will get a beating.

The senator recalled that during her 1992 presidential campaign, she had to rely on her team of volunteers, who were mostly young people.

In 1992, I had no money, so I merely relied on the energy and courage of young people. My volunteers had to beg for rejected wood from lumber yards and build the campaign stage, which sometimes crashed to the ground because it was overcrowded. Meanwhile, my opponents rented their crowds and even paid people to attend their rallies. (Anna Liza V. Alavaren)

Previous

Next

See the rest here:
Social media may decide next election

by Rappler.com Posted on 03/10/2014 5:56 PM |Updated 03/10/2014 6:12 PM

CLAIM YOUR POWER. Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago at a campaign rally in 2010. She says there would be less rallies because of the power of social media. Photo from her official Facebook page

MANILA, Philippines "The future of political warfare will take place online."

Thus predicted Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago who believes that social media, and not multi-billion-peso campaign funds, will influence the outcome of the 2016 elections.

It is entirely possible that the 2016 presidential and senatorial elections will be determined by social media, Santiago told Assumption College students in Makati City, Monday, March 10.

The senator, who was invited for the school's Communication Week, said that while some candidates have reportedly hired social media experts to improve their bid in the next national elections, netizens have the power to negate the chances of undeserving candidates through social media.

"The crooked candidates are already hiring professionals to dominate and maybe even control the social media. But such is the power of social media that netizens will be able to beat the candidates with unexplained wealth and their criminal campaign contributors," she said.

Santiago said that various social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have provided a venue where people can "easily and inexpensively" contact each other and share their opinions and experiences.

"Social media therefore lowers traditional socio-economic barriers to commanding the spotlight. The power of the rich politicians becomes more porous, and the political warlords have less control," she said.

'Claim your power'

Read more from the original source:
Miriam: Social media, not money, will influence 2016 polls

Former competition tsar Graeme Samuel has backed the prospect of weakening Australia's media ownership laws, arguing existing rules are becoming ''quickly irrelevant'' as more content moves online.

The previous chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Mr Samuel said three parties traditionally led the push for more media regulation: politicians looking for favourable coverage, media companies seeking to protect their turf, and those who have not kept up with technology.

Mr Samuel said there was still too much focus on the method of distribution - free-to-air television, pay television, radio and print - and not enough emphasis on telecommunications networks and the control of content.

And he said Australians had plenty of media choice, from new local sites The Guardian Australia, the Daily Mail Australia and The New Daily, to international publications Bloomberg, the Financial Times and The Economist, as well as blogs.

Advertisement

''What this all says to me is the whole process has changed, and it takes the emphasis away from the importance of whether a person controls radio, television or print,'' Mr Samuel said.

The federal government is reviewing whether to scrap reach rules, thereby allowing metropolitan television broadcasters to buy regional broadcasters, and whether to allow one company to own more than two of a newspaper, TV and radio licence in the same market.

Labor and prominent MP Clive Palmer say they are awaiting more detail before giving their policies, whereas the Greens have said that changes could entrench existing traditional media companies at the expense of new voices.

After his regional colleagues expressed concern that local news content might be diminished by any changes, Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull said on Monday that ''local content is a separate issue to the question of ownership''.

Mr Samuel agreed. ''If there's demand for local news in a local region, people will deliver it. We need to think in terms of empowering consumers to demand what they want, and not putting it in the hands of the government.''

More here:
Former consumer watchdog Graeme Samuel favours relaxed media rules

The head of the powerful US gun lobby railed against American media Thursday, saying it was biased and lying about the heated debate on regulating weapons.

"One of America's greatest threats is the national news media that fails to provide a level playing field for the truth," NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre told an annual conference of conservatives just outside Washington.

Congress failed to pass a hotly contested gun control law last year, despite a series of recent mass shootings that shocked the nation.

The failure came after stiff opposition by the National Rifle Association and other gun groups, which mounted a successful counter-campaign and warned members that the US government was bent on taking guns away.

"The political and media elite are lying to us," LaPierre told the annual Conservative Political Action Conference.

LaPierre, whose group counts about five million members, said the media "hate us, just for saying out loud and sticking up for what we believe, as if we had no right."

"But their moral indignation, it should be directed right into their own makeup mirrors," he added.

His comments echoed criticisms often made by conservatives about the mainstream media, which former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin once memorably dubbed the "lamestream media."

LaPierre vowed that "NRA members will never, and I mean never, submit or surrender to the national media."

Recalling that the right to bear arms is enshrined in the Second Amendment of the US Constitution, LaPierre declared that "standing with the NRA is a massive declaration of individual rights."

See the original post:
US gun lobby sees media as enemy

Evaluating the cost of a DDoS attack

A Wi-Fi security flaw leaves Virgin Media subscribers' wireless connections vulnerable to takeover by hackers.

The vulnerability, identified by IT consultant Paul Moore, means Virgin Media Superhub router/modem combo devices leak users' passwords every time they reboot. The issue arises because the Netgear-manufactured device initially brings up the wireless network without any form of encryption, allowing it to accidentally leak its Wi-Fi password in the clear to anyone nearby.

"After the seven-second window, the router takes the Wi-Fi card offline, enables encryption and brings the card back up," Moore explains. "Thatd be great, if we hadnt already broadcast the encryption key to everyone nearby.

Moore added:

Moore warns that hackers can take advantage of the vulnerability by forcing a device within range to reboot before snaffling the password. He wrote a proof-of-concept script that could automate this task while acting as a worm going from one router to another.

Successful exploitation of the trick, which is far from reliable, would allow miscreants to get up to all sorts of mischief, such as redirecting surfers from genuine websites to fraudulent versions in order to browse the hard drives of victims on the compromised networks. Hackers could even use a compromised connection to access illegal material in someone else's name.

The vulnerability is limited to the Netgear VMDG485 hub, supplied to Virgin Media customers as SuperHub2. The flaw means that, during the short time the device is booting up, it might be possible for someone physically nearby to gain access to its administrative settings web page and Wi-Fi passphrase, which is sent in the clear during the unencrypted window.

Fortunately the attack would be difficult to pull off in practice - and is easily prevented by changing the default password, which Virgin encourages all its customers to do when they are first installed. Virgin is working with Netgear to develop and test a software update to automate the process of making the changes.

It's unclear even approximately when a firmware update is likely to become available. Netgear has yet to respond to El Reg's query on this point.

Link:
Got a Netgear router from Virgin Media? Change your admin password NOW