Archive for the ‘Migrant Crisis’ Category

‘Datafication’ of EU borders and ballooning private-sector spending prompted by migrant crisis – Biometric Update

Spending by European Union agencies on border-related technology and surveillance rocketed from 2014 onwards amid the migrant crisis, reports Statewatch, which tracks the billions of euros spent and the consortia and oligopoly of companies which have benefited from biometrics and border control contracts.

Eu-Lisa, the agency which deals with IT systems and databases spend 1.5 billion (US$1.68 billion) from 2014-2020 while Frontex which handles border control and deportation spent 434 million ($487.5 million), with surveillance one of its fastest growing areas of spending. Frontex spending peaked in 2019 at around seven times its 2014 spending, eu-Lisa was spending around five times as much by 2020 compared to 2014 and expenditure still growing.

Statewatch examines the individual contracts from both agencies. The 2020 deal that eu-Lisa awarded to Idemia and Sopra Steria to implement a new biometric matching system (BMS) was worth 300 million ($337 million), the single largest contract from either agency.

This central biometric database will be the backbone of the Entry/Exit System (EES) to monitor all external border crossings by non-EU citizens.

Analysis of the data available shows that Sopra Steria and Idemia are commonly awarded contracts regardless of the database in question they have deals in place for maintaining and developing EES, EURODAC, SIS II and VIS, states Statewatch.

Frontex spent over 100 million on aerial surveillance in the period. This included 50 million going to Airbus and Elbit and a 14.5 million ($16.3 million) contract extension going to Diamon-Executive Aviation, CAE Aviation, EASP Air and Indra for maritime area aerial surveillance. Statewatch notes that the trend continued into 2021 with a further 84 million ($94.4 million) going to aerial surveillance.

Given the limited number of companies involved in the construction and maintenance of the EUs digital infrastructure for home affairs, it may be considered a case ofoligopoly The contracts are generally awarded to consortiums of huge transnational technology and consulting firms for example, Idemia (2020 revenue: 22 billion) and Sopra Steria (2020 revenue: 4.3 billion), states the report.

This creates a form of techno-dependency or vendor lock-in: every time the database needs to be updated or extended in some way, it is highly like that the contract will be awarded to the same companies that developed the system in the past. Along with the Spanish company Atos, Idemia and Sopra Steria have repeatedly been awarded contracts for the maintenance of certain large-scale databases, note the authors, pointing out that acquisitions in the identity sector make the group of vendors smaller still.

A representative of Idemia pointed out to Biometric Update in an email that the company earned 2.2 billion in 2020. The representative further noted that Idemia won the contract Statewatch refers to through a competitive tender process held in accordance with EU regulations, and that the company complies with all regulations for public sector contracts, including those specific to eu-LISA procurement.

According to Statewatch, the content of the contracts and subsequent sub-contracting by the winners remains opaque. While the EUs forthcoming Artificial Intelligence Act may put the dampeners on some of the technologies in use by border control agencies, the databases themselves are exempt.

The scene is set for the EUs datafied borders to continue expanding for some time to come, concludes the report. EU agencies are spending increasing sums to protect and secure EUs borders, a process that relies heavily upon the services of private companies.

Biometrics, drones, deportation flights and surveillance technologies will be used to further the key historical and political function of borders to discriminate at the same time as those technologies will become increasingly hidden from view. As this process continues, using digital methods and analytical skills to follow the money and track both the outsourcing process and its effects will remain key to strategies of resistance.

This post was updated at 11:46am Eastern on February 1, 2022 to note Idemias correct 2020 earnings and the companys response.

biometric matching | biometrics | border control | Entry/Exit System (EES) | eu-LISA | Europe | Frontex | government purchasing | IDEMIA | Sopra Steria | surveillance | vendor lock-in

Continue reading here:
'Datafication' of EU borders and ballooning private-sector spending prompted by migrant crisis - Biometric Update

The IRC responds to the detention of asylum seekers in Tapachula, Mexico – International Rescue Committee

Mexico City, Mexico, February 2, 2022 The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is deeply concerned by the recurring deployment of security forces in Mexico to block the way of people in need of protection.

Since 2021 and earlier this year, there have been reports of Mexican security forces halting groups of asylum seekers trying to move through the country. This week, the National Institute of Migration conducted raids to detain people deemed as under irregular status in the southern city of Tapachula. The raids took place near migrant shelterswhich goes against the Mexican migration lawin a city that is among the main ports of entry for asylum seekers, where thousands coming from countries like Haiti or Honduras have waited for months for a resolution to their ongoing asylum petitions.

Raymundo Tamayo, Country Director for Mexico at the International Rescue Committee, said:

Mexico has a long history of welcoming people from all around the world in times when crises have hit the hardest. In 2021, we saw the number of asylum requests in the country peak, with more than 131,000the highest in the last decade. We even witnessed the country open the door to welcome Afghan evacuees, establishing a cooperation with organizations like the IRC to deliver an emergency response.

Despite Mexico, having historically welcomed refugees, we are concerned about the increasingly frequent deployment of security forces to halt groups of people trying to get into (or cross through) the country in their search for safety. Measures like this only put those already escaping danger at a higher risk: people have been severely hurt or even killed.

International law must be reinforced and respected to receive and assist people fleeing conflict. We call for funding and cooperation among the countries along the migration corridors in the regionincluding Mexico, which has a strategic positionto offer protection and alternatives for those most affected by a humanitarian crisis. Seeking asylum is legal and efforts must be directed towards promoting collaboration between all sectors, including INGOs, to strengthen asylum policies and systems that guarantee the integrity of asylum seekers, regardless of their nationality or status.

The IRC in Mexico

The IRC isresponding along the main migration corridors in Mexico: from the southern to the northern borders and along the routes through the country. The IRCs programs offer a timely and comprehensive response to the most urgent needs of people on the move, including: prevention and response to gender-based violence; access to critical information through InfoDigna, a multi-channel information platform; prevention and mitigation of COVID-19; economic recovery and development; child protection services; as well as identifying needs and referring cases to local service providers. Additionally, the IRC is supporting local integration efforts by providing cultural orientation to individuals who have chosen to stay in Mexico.

About the IRC

The International Rescue Committee responds to the worlds worst humanitarian crises, helping to restore health, safety, education, economic wellbeing, and power to people devastated by conflict and disaster. Founded in 1933 at the call of Albert Einstein, the IRC is at work in over 40 countries and over 20 U.S. citieshelping people to survive, reclaim control of their future, and strengthen their communities.Learn more at http://www.rescue.org and follow the IRC on Twitter & Facebook.

Here is the original post:
The IRC responds to the detention of asylum seekers in Tapachula, Mexico - International Rescue Committee

Staffing crisis in agri-food industry is down to immigration rules, Poots told – Belfast Telegraph

Agri-food representatives have told Agriculture Minster Edwin Poots that the UKs immigration system is the main catalyst for staff shortages facing the industry here.

ne MLA described the situation as a perfect storm of failed regulations, economics and other forces that have severely impacted the sector.

Mr Poots said these shortages are causing difficulties across the food processing sector, and for abattoirs in particular, a situation he described as worrying.

Despite offering competitive wages, the minister said, agri-food firms here have struggled to recruit a fully-staffed workforce from the pool of domestic workers here, so have had to rely on migrant workers to fill the labour gap in the past. Changes to immigration rules made in Westminster, however, now mean migrant labour is limited to skilled jobs that meet certain salary levels and English language requirements.

Mr Poots added: Industry representatives have indicated that the new UK Immigration System is the main catalyst for the current shortages.

Engagement with industry indicates that there continues to be sizeable labour shortages, particular with respect to the number of slaughter plant operatives and butchers in our abattoirs and processing plants.

These labour shortages are causing difficulties across the food processing sector, however, it is the pig sector that is reporting the most serious difficulties with processing capacity, resulting in a rollover of pigs on farms each week.

Other pressures facing the pig sector are an increase in supply alongside a global fall in pig prices. Late last year, the UK Government announced temporary visas for 800 butchers for the pig sector in order to ease staffing pressures. Applications for this scheme have now closed and the DUP minister warned short-term schemes will do nothing to alleviate the agri-food staffing problem in the medium to longer-term.

This is a worrying situation and I continue to take all steps within my power to help mitigate the problem. A significant aspect of this is my continued and extensive engagement with Whitehall given that Immigration Policy is a reserved matter, he said.

Independent unionist MLA Claire Sugden said: Rules made in Westminster not in Stormont mean access to migrant labour is now limited to skilled jobs that meet set salary levels and English lan guage requirements.

As a result, we simply cannot find enough slaughter plant operatives and butchers in our abattoirs and processing plants.

The knock-on effect of this is that animals cannot be slaughtered and processed quickly enough. Farmers and plants have these animals queuing up for longer, which means farmers are not just spending more on feed the price of which has also soared in recent months but actually having to pay price penalties for overweight animals in the case of pigs.

It truly is a perfect storm of failed regulations, economics and other forces that together are conspiring to make meat farming and processing across Northern Ireland increasingly unsustainable.

SDLP agriculture spokesperson Patsy McGlone said the main reason for the issues is Brexit.

Minister Poots also acknowledges that there is no obvious solution to these problems. Perhaps if his party stopped threatening to collapse our institutions and supported an agreement between the EU and British Government to resolve the small number of outstanding issues around the Protocol, we could then turn our attentions to coming up with a plan to support businesses like these and help them attract the staff they need, he said.

Read more:
Staffing crisis in agri-food industry is down to immigration rules, Poots told - Belfast Telegraph

Migrant encounters increased again at the southern border in December: court docs – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Migrant encounters at the southern border increased again in December from the prior month, according to data provided to a federal court by the Biden administration -- the latest sign that the crisis at the border is likely to continue into 2022.

According to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data provided in the Jan 14 filing, there were 178,840 migrant encounters in December, up from 173,620 in November. That in turn was an increase from the 164,753 apprehensions in October.

BIDEN ADMIN FORMALLY TERMINATED KEY TRUMP-ERA MIGRATION AGREEMENTS AT HEIGHT OF BORDER CRISIS

Those numbers are drastically higher than the previous year, when there were 72,113 encounters in November and 73,994 in December.

CBP has not yet officially released its monthly operational update, and told Fox that it does not provide preliminary data or comment before the update posts. A spokesperson said that the official data should be published in the coming days.

Of the 178,840 apprehensions, 78,589 were expelled via Title 42 -- the Trump era public health order that has been kept in a limited capacity and can be used to expel migrants quickly at the southern border.

The documents also show that 55,626 migrants were released into the U.S. Of those, 36,652 were released on an order of recognizance with a Notice to Appear at an eventual court hearing. Meanwhile, nearly 19,000 were given humanitarian parole -- which is used on a "case by case basis" for an urgent humanitarian or significant public benefit reason.

The Biden administration has been struggling to deal with the ongoing crisis at the southern border, which saw a massive increase in apprehensions after President Biden was inaugurated. The number spiked to more than 213,000 encounters in July, and has dropped slightly since then but has remained stubbornly above the 150,000 mark.

Republican critics have blamed the surge on the dramatic rollback of Trump-era border protections and policies. The Biden administration has ended border wall construction, terminated asylum cooperative agreements and limited the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to arrest and deport illegal immigrants.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION REACHES DEAL WITH MEXICO TO REIMPLEMENT TRUMP-ERA REMAIN IN MEXICO POLICY

The administration also ended the Migrant Protection Protocols -- a key policy of the Trump administration which saw migrants returned to Mexico as their hearings progressed. It was seen as central in ending the practice of "catch and release."

However, the Supreme Court upheld a federal court ruling that the Biden administration ended the program unlawfully, and ordered it restored. The filing came as part of that ongoing litigation.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

While the administration has complied with the order, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has issued a memo indicating that the agency will end the policy -- which critics have decried as cruel -- in a manner that complies with the court ruling.

Fox News' Griff Jenkins contributed to this report.

Continued here:
Migrant encounters increased again at the southern border in December: court docs - Fox News

Del Rio and the Call for Migrant Justice – The New Yorker

The violent removal of Haitian asylum seekers from their encampments in Del Rio, Texas, in September, opened a critical window for reckoning with the centrality of racismand anti-Black racism in particularto the conduct and character of U.S. border policing. Photographs taken at the scene showed uniformed white agents in chaps and full riding gear as they drove Haitians away from U.S. territory. In one shot, captured by the photojournalist Paul Ratje, an agent lunges forward to grab a young mans shirt; the man, who has since been identified as Mirard Joseph, is carrying nothing more threatening than food for his wife and daughter.

The spectacle of heavily armed border guards abusing vulnerable migrants reminds us that the U.S.-Mexico border is not a neutral entity. Since it was established, following the U.S.-Mexican War, it has been an instrument of power and control. The images of the mounted border agents drew comparisons to slave patrols, which emerged in the early eighteenth century in the U.S. to enforce slave codes, catch escapees, and prevent Black revolt. These groups evolved into militias such as the Texas Rangers, which prosecuted war against the Karankawa, Cherokee, and Comanche tribal nations, pursued fugitive slaves into Mexico, and established control over ethnic Mexican communities. By 1835, when they were formally constituted as a law-enforcement agency, the Rangers had created a culture of policing in the service of white supremacy. (Working with the descendants of affected communities, Monica Muoz Martinez and others have recovered the record of Ranger atrocities, including the 1918 Porvenir Massacre, in which Rangers and local ranchers executed fifteen unarmed Tejanos.) Founded in 1924, the Border Patrol recruited directly from the Texas Rangers and incorporated the habits of using border security to enforce white racial primacy. During this early period, many agents were active in borderland chapters of the Ku Klux Klan.

The Del Rio images recalled photographs taken more than a century ago, of Texas Rangers posed triumphantly on horseback over the bodies of slain Mexicans. (Those images circulated widely, too, serving as sensational propaganda for white power.) They also called further back, to images of slave patrols. On Twitter, the N.A.A.C.P. paired Ratjes photograph with a nineteenth-century engraving of a mounted slave patrol. The symmetry between the two images is chilling. In the engraving, a white man in a riding costume leans forward with his whip raised. He is about to strike a Black fugitive, whose back is turned to him at much the same angle as the Haitian youth in the other photograph. The whips, the ropes, the horsesall of them have been marshalled for the sake of inflicting pain and fear. In both instances, the law of the land gives white men on horseback plenary power over Black people in flight for survival.

By calling up painful racial memory, the Del Rio photographs provoked an important dialogue about the rights and protections owed to migrant members of the Black diaspora. On September 21st, Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, of Texass Eighteenth District, in Houston, exercised her authority as an executive board member of the Congressional Black Caucus to call for an official inquiry into the events. On September 22nd, she and eight other C.B.C. members met with White House officials to express their concern that the Border Patrols actions were discriminatory and unlawful, and to remind them of their commitments to Haitian asylum seekers and members of the Haitian diaspora. These included the May, 2021, announcement of a new Temporary Protected Status for Haitians, made months before the assassination of President Jovenel Mose and a major earthquake further destabilized the country. The Department of Homeland Securitys inspector general declined to conduct an investigation. Instead, it referred the matter to Customs and Border Protections office of professional responsibility; the outcome of that investigation remains pending.

President Bidens response to demands for accountability was to join in the outrage. Calling the Del Rio photographs horrible, he announced a suspension of the use of horse patrols in migrant management in Del Rio. Even this effort at restraint proved illusory. On October 7th, the Facebook page of the Border Patrols Del Rio sector featured a photo of agents on horseback encircling a group of captured migrants. The accompanying text boasted about having made over 1,000 apprehensions across sector yesterday. Months after their dispersal, the U.S. has not accounted for the fate of the many thousands of Haitian and other migrants who populated the Del Rio encampment. As D.H.S. escalated its program of deportation flights, an estimated eight thousand entered Mexico to avoid the catastrophic consequences of forced return. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas had the temerity to call these voluntary departures.

Even as Biden introduced his Collaborative Migration Management Strategy, in July, which promises safe, orderly, and humane migration, his Administration has continued to defend Title 42, the Trump Administration order that enlists the governments of Central America and Mexico in a program tantamount to mass expulsion. This has had devastating consequences for Black migrants and other vulnerable populations. In late August, video recordings of National Guard and immigration police in Tapachula, Chiapas, captured images of Mexican agents throwing Haitian, Cuban, Central American, and South American women and children to the ground and delivering beatings to break up a migrant caravan. Last fall, Mexican immigration officials were deporting some three hundred migrants a day at the southern border with Guatemala, Haitians among them, as part of a partnership with the U.S. In early December, representatives of the several thousand Haitians encamped outside of a sports arena in Tapachula protested their subjection to hunger, assaults, and unsanitary conditions while awaiting processing by migration authorities. The reinstatement of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (Remain in Mexico) in Texas on December 2nd (in modified form) will only increase the displacement of Haitian and other vulnerable migrants to similar sites of confinement in Mexico.

To charges of human-rights abuses and failure, the Biden Administration, like others before it, answered weakly that they must follow the rule of law. But no law requires that people fleeing political violence and natural disaster should be met by the militarized cordon sanitaire in South Texas. We have so normalized the excessive use of force at the border that few questioned Governor Greg Abbotts September 22nd decision to briefly deploy hundreds of Border Patrol cars in a kilometres-long wall of steel against Haitians and other migrants huddled under border bridges and in makeshift camps near the Rio Grande. It was a costly stunt that will prolong state failure and human catastrophe.

The Del Rio photographs are shadowed by other violence that goes unseen and unrecorded by cameras. Immigration-law enforcement works by imposing privation and social isolation on those deemed alien and illegal: familial separation, physical and sexual abuse, and prolonged captivity. Migrants invoke international and civil-rights law to defend themselvesMirard Joseph, who appears in Ratjes Del Rio photograph, has filed a lawsuit against the federal governmentbut they most often confront these conditions alone and beyond any effective oversight. The Del Rio photographs should also make us look differently at the images we do seethe pictures of lawful violence that circulate in media coverage of the so-called migrant crisis. Scenes of migrants in chains, boarding buses on their way to deportation flights, have yet to cause the same anguish. Until someone you love is in chains or wearing an ankle monitor, it is possible to imagine that these are not dehumanizing or scarring.

Black civil-rights leaders and migrant organizations responded to the Del Rio photos with a broad campaign for racial justice. The UndocuBlack Network issued a statement that called for an end to the war on Black migrants. On September 22nd, the leaders of the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, the N.A.A.C.P., the National Urban League, and other groups wrote to President Biden to denounce his Administrations mistreatment of Haitian refugees, stating, of the Del Rio photographs, We are hard-pressed in the year 2021 to find more horrific, traumatizing and blatantly racist images. The images are distressing not only because they depict racial cruelty. They also cause harm by making Black migrants appear helpless, passive, and defeatedthe inverse mirror of the prevailing image of migrants as a criminal threat. This is an insidious message, because it is false and because it perpetuates misapprehension about the relationship between migrants and the nations they seek to enter. As the Haitian Bridge Alliance reminds us, these Haitian refugees are not strangers. They are kin to long-standing Haitian communities in the U.S. Black migrant-led campaigns to end deportations stand out from the cacophony of the border debates for their refusal to depict Haitian migrants as foreign; their call, Immigration Is a Black Issue, integrates them into a broader campaign for racial justice based in principles of equity and abolition.

The U.S. government has largely excluded migrant-led organizations from the process of policy reform. And yet migrant communities have been crucial protagonists in the most vital struggles of our difficult moment. One finds migrant-led organizations working to raise wages and worker-safety standards, fight racial and sexual discrimination, support vulnerable people during the pandemic, and address the harms of climate change. In Vermont, migrant dairy workers created the Milk with Dignity program, a platform of farmworkers rights that yielded landmark gains in health-care coverage, worker safety, and wage-theft prevention. In New York, migrants held a rolling hunger strike, the Fast for the Forgotten, to obtain a historic $2.1-billion pandemic-relief fund for undocumented workers. Food couriers in Manhattan secured protective legislation for those performing the dangerous tasks of fulfilling mobile-app orders. In my city of New Haven, Connecticut, the migrant-led Semilla Collective formed a food garage and community garden that fed hundreds of low-income and shut-in people during the pandemic.

With no path to formal political rights, migrants have also crafted powerful, affirmative responses to the failures of immigration and economic policies. In transit through Mexico, migrants have made their journeys into protest marches against the cacera de migrantesmigrant-huntingstaged in the face of the extraordinary forces marshalled against them. During the worst years of the Trump era, migrant-led organizations, including the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, drafted the Migrant Justice Platform, conceived as an open-source unity blueprint for reconceptualizing migration governance. It departs from legislative strategies for comprehensive immigration reform, by linking migration policy to the defense of labor rights and the repair of civic institutions. Like the abolitionists before them, theirs is a political project based in solidarity and an abiding appreciation for liberty. Like our most radical futurists, they are calling forth horizontal social relations made for the global age. Freedom from the kind of violence and misery on exhibit in Del Rio is unthinkable right now only because we have made it so.

Read more:
Del Rio and the Call for Migrant Justice - The New Yorker