Archive for the ‘Migrant Crisis’ Category

How Generation Africa is Changing the Narrative of Migration in African Communities – International Documentary Association |

On a cold Berlin afternoon in February 2022, Nigerian filmmaker Ike Nnaebue presented his debut feature documentary, No U-Turn, to a public audience for the first time. Nnaebues strikingly personal documentary, in which he attempts to retrace a journey he embarked on 27 years agothe tumultuous migrant route from West Africa to southern Europepremiered in the Panorama section of the Berlinale.

No U-Turn, which received a special mention by the Berlinale documentary jury, is part of the Generation Africa project, an ambitious collection of 25 feature-length, medium and short films centered around the hot-button issue of migration on the African continent.

Generation Africa is an initiative of the South African nonprofit Social Transformation and Empowerment Projects (STEPS), a media organization that uses documentaries to consolidate social change, particularly in Africa.

According to STEPS co-founder and documentary stalwart, Don Edkins, the objective of Generation Africaand STEPS, ultimatelyis about giving voice to disadvantaged people and communities through film, while also finding strategic ways to spark conversations on some of the most pertinent contemporary issues. Of the unique role of Generation Africa, Edkins explains, The focus is on social and environmental issues that people face in the communities locally but also globally. When we started Generation Africa, we took a look at the continent and saw this enormous youth population without a voice. We werent listening or learning from young people about their challenges, dreams, opportunities, or lack thereof.

Generation Africa is the fourth cycle of projects undertaken by STEPS since its inception in 2001. STEPS has also executed projects themed around structural causes of poverty, as well as the role of democracy in governance.

Conceptualized at a time when the global news media was awash with reports of a migrant crisis in Europe, with images of African youth crossing the Mediterranean into Europe becoming morbid fodder for politicking, Generation Africa sought to regain control of the narrative and frame it within the proper context. For one, the bulk of migration involving Africans was happening within the continent, not outside. And the lurid headlines and fear-mongering stories mostly failed to capture the humanity or lived realities of the migrants.

The films in the series go deep into the issuespersonal, social, economic, and environmental factors that surround migration, within Africa and outside, but mostly within. The portraits that emerge are often fully realized, compassionate accounts that present their subjects as human beings armed with agency and exercising their basic right to move across borders.

Some of these stories are heartbreaking, some breathtaking. Ousmane Samasskous The Last Shelter, which won the grand prize at the 2021 CPH:DOX, manages to be both. The director embeds himself in a halfway home for migrants close to the desert and captures the beauty in the wrenching stories of broken people and survivors alike. There are stories that find joy in the simple things. Rumbi Katedzas Transactions is a racy chronicle of a Zimbabwean family that remains close-knit and in good spirits, even while members are scattered around the world.

The films in the collection have a common thread of deconstructing migration, but many of them cover a wider gamut of issues relating to the experiences of young people on the continent. Noella Lukas Whats Eating my Mind investigates mental illness, a taboo topic in many communities. Fatimah Dadzies Fatis Choice considers female participation in migration and the changing roles of women in traditional societies. Many of the films depict how migration impacts families and empowers communities in ways that global development aid does not always succeed. It is impossible to engage with the films in the collection without confronting relatable characters presented as living, complex beings.

These films went through a rigorous curatorial process, though, especially with respect to matters of duty of care and accountability.

Historically, documentaries made in and about Africa have been skewed in ways that have not always been the most edifying. With this in mind, plenty of thought and effort has gone into creating documentaries that engage with their subjects and themes in ways that are respectful and authentic.

Tiny Mungwe, producer on Generation Africa, talks about the principles guiding the selection. One of the things we noticed when we put out the call was that the majority of the stories had filmmakers hoping to speak on behalf of people, without providing enough evidence of engaging with their subjects. We were attracted to projects where the filmmakers established a clear connection with the community and had a shared interest in starting social change by telling stories with the community. These are the types of stories we tried to identify and take into the development process.

With the participation of an international consortium of partners, the projects are developed with professional support for the filmmakers at all stages of the production process. Experts were invited to reflect with the filmmaking teams about their ideas and the possible results. For many of the filmmakers, it was a different way of working and thinking about film. Edkins reflects, For filmmakers that rely on NGO work, it is a shift in terms of their storytelling, and I think that has been interesting, working with them to help understand the possibilities that this offers.

Mungwe is quick to impress that the film teams retain the freedom to tell their own stories. She stresses, Rather than dish out a way of making documentaries, we want to create a space to free our filmmakers of any biases. She continues, There isnt a formula that we are parachuting into people. We are asking them to really interrogate why certain conventions exist and how well those conventions have worked, historically and today.

With the focus on east and west Africaregions that do not necessarily have strong creative documentary industriesand on younger filmmakers in the early phases of their career, instilling an ethically sound culture of responsibility, equity and accountability in the documentary-making process came with its own rewards.

Akuol de Mabior, whose debut feature-length doc, No Simple Way Home, also premiered at the Berlinalea first for South Sudanfound this to be the case. Navigating the realities of shooting her films protagonisther mother, who also happens to be one of South Sudans vice presidentswas easier because her core crew of cinematographer and sound recordist was composed of women. It was important that we were three East African women, de Mabior shares. My mom took us in like her daughters; that is how we were able to maintain a level of intimacy such that filming in her bedroom did not feel awkward.

Beyond the festival circuit, all the films in the Generation Africa collection will be available for free on AfriDocs, the pan-African streaming platform set up by STEPS to distribute African documentaries, for anyone on the continent with Internet access. Future generations of filmmakers will thus have access to locally relevant, world-class documentaries. Viewers elsewhere will be able to access the films through broadcast agreements between STEPS and global partners. Building documentary communities is at the heart of the work STEPS does, and with Generation Africa, that culture is being reinforced. Getting the films to audiences is just as important as creating them.

STEPS was conceived in the late 90s as a reaction to the stories of death and devastation surrounding the HIV/AIDS pandemic, which hit South Africa hard. The original cycle, dubbed Steps for the Future, included 38 HIV/AIDS-themed films from seven countries, each one offering a different narrative to what the global media was peddling. The project pioneered mobile cinemas, organized community screenings, and distributed local-language versions of the films via support groups. Facilitators were trained to organize discussions at the community level to enable people to take control of their decision-making process.

These methodologies have been revisited with successive project cycles organized by STEPS,and have proven to be effective in reaching new audiences and driving behavioral change. With most of the Generation Africa films now nearing completion, participating filmmakers are being supported to draw up strategies that will drive engagement within their respective communities. This will aim to create a dialogue on what migration means to people and how it can support development in their communities. For Ike Nnaebue, the Berlinale premiere is only the beginning of the impact that he hopes to achieve with No U-Turn. Having abandoned his own quest to migrate to Europe decades ago, he wants to use his film not just to discourage migration through dangerous routes, but also to drum up awareness and raise funds to resettle and integrate people who would like to come back home.

Nnaebue credits Generation Africa for putting him in a position to give back to his community and for linking him with a global network of filmmakers and resource persons. He concludes, "You can never underestimate the power of the collective."

Wilfred Okiche has attended critic programs and reported from festivals in Locarno, Rotterdam, Stockholm, and Sundance. He works as a film critic and occasional programmer and has garnered experience covering and writing about documentaries, Nollywood, and African cinema. His writing has appeared in Variety, IndieWire, Filmkrant, and Senses of Cinema, among other publications.

Wilfred Okiche is a 2022 Documentary Magazine Editorial Fellow. The Fellowship program is supported in part by the National Endowment for the Arts and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. To find out more about how National Endowment for the Arts grants impact individuals and communities, visit http://www.arts.gov.

Visit link:
How Generation Africa is Changing the Narrative of Migration in African Communities - International Documentary Association |

Mayorkas claims southern border ‘is secure’ as historic migrant crisis …

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Tuesday claimed that the southern border "is secure" even as Border Patrol agents are facing historic migrant numbers.

Mayorkas spoke at the Aspen Security Forum, where he was asked about the situation at the southern border which has seen more than 200,000 migrant encounters a month in the last four months.

But, even though he acknowledged the situation is a "historic challenge," the secretary claimed the border is "secure."

"Look, the border is secure," he said. "We are working to make the border more secure. That has been a historic challenge."

REPS COMER, STEFANIK PUSH MAYORKAS ON FUNDING OF NGOS FOR MIGRANT RELEASES INTO US

He also used the question to take aim at lawmakers who have said they will not pass comprehensive immigration legislation. A number of Republicans have said they would not consider legislation that includes a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the country until the border crisis ends.

Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testifies before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, on Capitol Hill, May 4, 2022. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Image)

"I have said to a number of legislators who expressed to me that we need to address the challenge at the border before they pass legislation and I take issue with the math of holding the solution hostage until the problem is resolved," he said.

DHS WON'T PROVIDE INFO ON TERROR PLOTS UNTIL CONGRESS GETS WAIVERS FROM ACCUSED NON-CITIZENS, REPUBLICANS SAY

"There is work to be done," he said before clarifying that "safe and secure are two different words."

"There are smugglers that operate on the Mexican side of the border and placing one's life in their hands is not safe," he said.

His remarks come after Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced last week that there were 207,000 migrant encounters at the border in June, compared to just over 189,000 in June last year. The June report shows there were 105,161 migrants removed from the U.S. last month, including 92,273 expelled under CDCs Title 42 order 79,652 migrants were released into the US.

With Junes numbers, there have now been 1,746,119 total encounters at the southern border in the 2022 fiscal year outpacing the 1,734,686 encounters set in the FY21, and with still three months remaining in FY'22.

Republicans have zeroed in on the Biden administration's handling of the crisis, blaming its rolling back of Trump-era border policy like the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), which requires migrants be returned to Mexico for the duration of their immigration hearings. The administration has also narrowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) priorities, stopped border wall construction and implemented an asylum rule to expedite the length of hearings.

The administration has pushed back on those claims by Republicans, blaming instead the closing off of legal asylum pathways by the Trump administration and also pointing to "root causes" like poverty, violence and corruption in Central America. It is also seeking to end Title 42 expulsions, which have been used to expel a majority of migrants since March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. arguing that a shift to traditional expulsions will lower repeat encounters and dissuade migrants. So far the administration has been blocked by a federal court from ending Title 42.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Mayorkas has repeatedly defended his handling of the border crisis, in April he said that his DHS inherited a broken and dismantled system that is already under strain only Congress can fix this."

"Yet, we have effectively managed an unprecedented number of non-citizens seeking to enter the United States," he told lawmakers.

Fox News' Lawrence Richard contributed to this report.

Adam Shaw is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital, with a focus on immigration. He can be reached at adam.shaw2@fox.com or on Twitter: @AdamShawNY

Continue reading here:
Mayorkas claims southern border 'is secure' as historic migrant crisis ...

Can Republicans Fix Bidens Migrant Crisis? RedState

President Joe Bidens migrant crisis is still in full swing with no light at the end of the tunnel. Despite the fact that the White House recently took action to curb the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States, doubts remain as to whether the administration is able or even willing to take concrete action to deal with the problem.

With Republicans set to retake the House and possibly the Senate in the upcoming congressional elections, they will be expected to provide legislative solutions. On Friday, the House Republican Conference revealed their plan to address the immigration issue after they take power in 2023.

The proposal is designed to bolster physical infrastructure as well as closing asylum loopholes, according to Fox News. The plan was concocted by the American Security Task Force, which was established by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in 2021 to create policies that would address the influx of immigrants coming to the southern border. It is headed by Rep. John Katko (R-NY), who laid out a series of initiatives under the plan.

Weve got a lot of very serious security issues going on at the border, people from 160 different countries have come across the border, and its not just a Mexican and Northern Triangle issue, its a worldwide issue that people are exploiting, Katko said during an interview with Fox. Its really a concern. So everything we did in here has that background in mind and that background of Weve got to stop this. We can turn it around, and weve got to do better.

For starters, the legislation would require the federal government to continue construction on the border wall, which began under former President Donald Trump. Progress on the wall was halted almost as soon as President Biden sat down behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office. It was part of his initiative to brand himself as the anti-Trump, by rolling back most of his predecessors immigration policies. The result was the massive surge of migrants traveling to the border to gain entry into the United States.

The bill would also improve the technology used by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and allow for increased staffing. The last bit is important because the agency has been stretched thin as it attempts to keep up with the number of people crossing the border illegally. It would also grant more funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Katkos group is also proposing that the government expand the Title 42 public health order, which allowed border authorities to expel a majority of migrants in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was also used to curtail the flow of fentanyl and other dangerous drugs into the U.S.

The proposal would also reinstitute the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), which is also known as the Remain in Mexico policy. The program required migrants seeking asylum to stay in Mexico while their cases were being decided. It ended the Catch and Release approach favored by previous presidents that allowed individuals to stay in America as they awaited their court dates. Many of these folks failed to show up for court and remained in the country illegally.

Surprisingly enough, the proposed legislation also includes provisions mandating the use of E-Verify nationally. The conservative base has wanted such a measure for decades, but GOP lawmakers failed to pass it.

The unveiling of the Republicans immigration plan comes as the White House quietly resumed construction on the border wall in the area of Yuma, Arizona. Despite calling Trump a racist xenophobe for even suggesting a physical barrier, Biden is now continuing the policy, at least in part. The New York Post reported:

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas authorized Customs and Border Protection Thursday to seal the openings near the Morelos Dam just west of downtown Yuma.

The department said the area presents safety and life hazard risks for migrants attempting to cross into the United States where there is a risk of drownings and injuries from falls. This area also poses a life and safety risk to first responders and agents responding to incidents in this area.

Between January and June of this year, Border Patrol has detained illegals trying to get into the country over 160,000 times. Yuma, along with the Del Rio and Rio Grande Valley sectors in Texas, has had the most activity at the border.

The Republicans plan is an ambitious one. Passing this legislation wont be easy with the number of open borders Democrats in Congress. The GOP will have to win solid majorities in both houses to even hope to pass such a sweeping plan. With President Biden in the White House, we can bet that the veto pen will be at the ready, if Republicans manage to put together a package that would actually deal with the problem Biden seems determined not to solve. Still, it could provide a good template for the future when Democrats lose the White House. It might be a few more years before we see any real movement on the border but hopefully, this will be the beginning.

Here is the original post:
Can Republicans Fix Bidens Migrant Crisis? RedState

The insane topsy-turvy response to NYCs migrant crisis – New York Post

Who else finds the citys response to its illegal-migrant influx utterly surreal?

Over in The Bronx, hundreds of migrants lined up Sunday to sign up for health coverage and collect food, free phones and school supplies.

Friday at Department of Education headquarters, Chancellor David Banks detailed plans to get a thousand-plus migrant kids enrolled in public schools before classes start Sept. 8 amid advocate complaints that the DOE hasnt been moving fast enough.

Meanwhile, Department of Social Serviceschief Gary Jenkins is embroiled in accusations that he tried to cover up the scandal of some migrants having to stay overnight at an intake center rather than immediately being gotten to shelters. Oh, and the beleaguered hotel industry is jumping to offer new shelter space at a price, of course.

All this amid Mayor Eric Adams ongoing war of words with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, complaining about the relative handful of migrants Abbotts busing north to highlight how overwhelmed his towns are by the thousands arriving daily.

Yet Adams was silent for months about the migrants sent here by the Biden administration which is responsible for literally waving in the entire vast wave, and for distributing countless illegal border-crossers across the nation, including via secretive middle-of-the-night flights.

Its beyond bizarre that the citys entire power structure (most certainly including those all-too-powerful advocates) treats this insanity like it was some new form of weather, a challenge that erupted out of the blue through no ones fault except Abbotts, of course.

Set aside the refusal to even mention the presidents central role, and the fact that hes executing what somehow has become Democrats dogmatic open-borders policy (even if they refuse to put it that way, all joining in the just the weather denial).

Ignore, too, that this crisis should have some New York leaders finally questioning the citys shelter for all comers guarantees, and its extremist (since Mayor Bill de Blasio redefined it) sanctuary city policy.

Why does everyone insist on ignoring the migrants own agency here? These people chose to come chose to travel thousands of miles to illegally enter another country, usually crossing other countries where they could have stayed and then to come to New York City.

Heck, those who arrive send word back home (and to those already en route) about how to game the system, on top of advice from the federally funded advocate nonprofits urging them to make the trip.

Yes, many of them rush to find some way to be self-sufficient. And theyre all seeking a better life, and responding to the come on in signals so many Americans send.

But all of this is a result of human choices, not of mysterious forces requiring the rest of us to simply adjust. Routinely, universally pretending otherwise may be politically convenient, but it increasingly enrages everyone in the reality-based community.

View post:
The insane topsy-turvy response to NYCs migrant crisis - New York Post

The Channel migrant crisis will make or break Liz Truss – The Spectator

Liz Truss has been clear about her key selling point throughout her leadership campaign. At its launch she boasted: I can lead, I can make tough decisions and get things done.

And her whole campaign has amounted to variations upon that theme I do what I say I will do, Im somebody who gets things done in TV debates, hustings with members and personal appearances.

So Liz Truss not the slickest communicator but gets things done: thats the offer which Conservative members are buying into in droves. Of course, Boris Johnson was once the getting things done go-to guy. Or at least the Get Brexit Done candidate.

And that was the problem. Once Brexit got done and the obsessively focused Dominic Cummings left his side, Johnson proved fairly useless at the implementation side of things. He never lost his columnists facility for story-telling, but the dog-ate-my-homework excuses saw a chill descend towards him from many of his natural supporters.

On no issue was this ultimately fatal loss of faith felt so keenly as on the shocking surrender of control over the United Kingdoms borders.

Just a month into his premiership, Johnson spoke out about a then trickle of inflatable dinghies illegally unloading human cargo on the Kent coast after crossing the English Channel from France. We will send you back, declared the new prime minister directly to camera in August 2019.

In 2019 there were in total 1,843 illegal arrivals via this new method, almost all of whom went on to lodge asylum claims. The next year there were 8,466 such arrivals and almost nobody got sent back anywhere. Far from the Johnson administration implementing an effective deterrent regime as promised, successful arrivals began to put out TikTok videos about how easy this border-busting was proving to be, much to the impotent fury of Home Secretary Priti Patel.

In 2021 there were 28,526 arrivals by dinghy recorded. At the tail end of last week the number so far for 2022 surged past 20,000, almost twice the number who had arrived by the same point last year. It can now confidently be asserted that the government will do even worse this year than last, probably considerably so.

Everything Ms Patel has promised or tried on Mr Johnsons behalf has failed; paying France to stop the dinghies setting out has produced scant results, France has also refused to take back people picked up mid-Channel, there have been no pushbacks at sea, the Ministry of Defence being placed in charge of operations has only resulted in an improved water taxi service to whisk migrants to Dover and that experiment will shortly come to an end. Some 30,000 hotel rooms at a cost of 5 million a day have been requisitioned to accommodate the arrivals, the vast majority of whom are young men.

And the Rwanda removals agreement, that great hope of springtime, has come to nought as well, tied up in knots by human rights lawyers. With immigration in general surging contrary to 2019 Conservative manifesto promises and the government leaning on local authorities to divert scarce social housing away from British families and towards the huge numbers of Afghans and Ukrainians it has invited to come, nobody should believe liberal commentators who claim that the public are relaxed about all this.

In fact there is a feeling that the basic social contract between the government and the citizenry is breaking down given the ease with which foreign nationals can circumvent UK borders. Among2016 Leave voters and 2019 Conservative voters, immigration and asylum is rated as the second most important issue, behind the economic crisis.

The Tory leadership candidates understand that among party members its salience is just as high, which is why both Truss and Rishi Sunak have pledged to drive through the Rwanda policy. Truss has promised to seek similar agreements with other countries too.

So if Ms Trusss emerging political brand is to hold together rather than fall apart she will swiftly need to demonstrate progress on this front rather than just raging impotently, Johnson-style.

She says she does not rule out the UK withdrawing from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, but first wishes to try a less drastic remedy passing a British Bill of Rights to bolster the jurisdiction of UK courts. Suella Braverman, the Attorney General, was clear in her own leadership campaign that this alone is unlikely to prove effective and so did advocate withdrawal from the ECHR.

Putting Braverman in charge of the governments response on this issue either as Home Secretary or Justice Secretary would send a useful signal to the Conservative-leaning voters for whom it is a major priority.

But Ms Truss will also need to prepare for the Bill of Rights approach to fail, not least because our own judiciary is quite capable of expanding de facto rights to asylum seekers and thwarting removals but also because it wont stop the ECHR interfering.

She must do enough between now and the next election to reassure Tory-leaning voters that she will do whatever it takes to stop the abuse of the asylum system. That may mean setting up a vast new asylum processing centre on the British overseas territory of Ascension Island, whether or not the Americans who share our military bases there object. It may mean routine detention of every asylum-seeker while claims are processed.

It will certainly mean preparing a radical set of policies for the next manifesto, including walking away from the ECHR and disavowing a swathe of other unsustainable international agreements.

Such an approach will cause an uproar among the liberal establishment and left-of-centre opposition parties. That could prove politically useful should Ms Truss hold her nerve, forcing an issue Labour is deeply uncomfortable talking about to the top of the broadcast media agenda. But her prime challenge will be to convince people that, unlike the teller of tall stories who preceded her, she really means it.

Read more here:
The Channel migrant crisis will make or break Liz Truss - The Spectator