Archive for the ‘Migrant Crisis’ Category

Wednesday briefing: Tory rebellion brews over vaccine passports – The Guardian

Top story: Result may hinge on Labour votes

Good morning, Warren Murray here with your passport to the news.

Conservative MPs believe Boris Johnson faces a major rebellion over Covid vaccine passports but could be supported by Labour, who were on Tuesday night wavering over whether to back them. Tory MPs opposed to the plan for nightclubs, other crowded indoor venues and possibly more places, said more than 40 Conservatives were prepared to defy the PM over civil liberties concerns. The scale of the rebellion could put any vote on a knife-edge if opposition parties also oppose it.

In the US, an emboldened Dr Anthony Fauci has clashed with Rand Paul, a Republican senator for Kentucky and longtime opponent of mask-wearing. Paul suggested that Fauci had lied before Congress in May when he denied that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded so-called gain of function research on viruses at the Wuhan virology lab in China.

Fauci told a Senate committee that a study cited by Paul referenced a different sort of virus entirely. This paper that you are referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function Senator Paul, you do not know what youre talking about, quite frankly. And I want to say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about If anybody is lying here, senator, it is you. More coronavirus news at our live blog.

France paid to hold back boats The UK taxpayer is to hand over a further 62.7m (55m) to France to fund another clampdown on small-boat crossings of the Channel, the Home Office has revealed. The home secretary, Priti Patel, agreed to pay the sum as part of a deal reached with the French interior minister, Grald Darmanin, on Tuesday. At least 430 people crossed the Dover Strait on Monday, a record for a single day. On Tuesday more than 287 migrants succeeded in reaching the UK, bringing the total for the year to at least 8,452 according to available official data compiled by PA Media.

Carries clowns Boris Johnsons closest aides decided he was unfit to be prime minister within weeks of his 2019 election victory and began plotting to oust him, Dominic Cummings has claimed. On the BBC, in his first TV interview since quitting as one of the most senior advisers in No 10, Cummings told how disagreements grew between him and the PM over how to tackle Covid. He also accused the prime ministers wife, Carrie, of trying to appoint complete clowns to certain key jobs. He urged Brexiters to consider creating a new party to take on the Conservatives or do what he did and take over an existing party and try and bend it to something thats different but did not say he should necessarily be at the forefront of such a movement.

Midweek catch-up

> Boris Johnson has called on the EU to address the serious issues that have arisen as he publishes a blueprint aimed at re-engineering the Northern Ireland Brexit protocol, including eliminating checks on goods ranging from car parts to fresh food including sausages.

> Mens spending on goods causes 16% more climate-heating emissions than womens, despite the amount of money being very similar, a Swedish study has found. The biggest difference was mens spending on petrol and diesel for cars.

> Rishi Sunak is poised to usher in cuts to public services of up to 17bn compared with pre-pandemic plans unless he takes action this summer to increase funding, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said.

> Labours ruling body has gone ahead and banned four far-left factions that were vocal supporters of Jeremy Corbyns leadership. The NEC also altered its complaints process to address its handling of complaints about antisemitism.

> Unsolicited sending of obscene images should be made illegal through the creation of a new offence of cyberflashing, a UK government-commissioned review has recommended. Separately, street harassment is to be outlawed in England and Wales.

> After Jeff Bezos and friends went just over the edge of space in his Blue Origin rocket, experts have addressed why the spacecraft has a very particular shape.

Trump ally on foreign influence charge The chair of Donald Trumps 2017 inaugural committee, Tom Barrack, has been arrested for allegedly conspiring to influence Trumps foreign policy positions to benefit the United Arab Emirates and commit crimes striking at what prosecutors described as the very heart of our democracy. Barrack, 74, of Santa Monica, California, was among three men charged in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, with conspiring to act as an unregistered foreign agent as they tried to influence foreign policy while Trump was running in 2016 and later while he was president.

We crave a Disney ending Time could be running out for a stranded baby killer whale named Toa, who has charmed New Zealand but needs round-the-clock care to stay alive. The young calf, thought to be between two and six months old, became stuck in rocks 10 days ago. A cast of hundreds, from experts to volunteers, have been caring for Toa while the search for his pod continues.

Dr Karen Stockin, a marine biologist, said internationally recognised practice for separated cetaceans this young was either lifelong human care or euthanasia: New Zealand has no captive or rehabilitation facility that could support Toa. The conservation departments marine species manager, Ian Angus, said that while the rescue operation was entering into a delicate stage, Toas health remained good and the focus was on reuniting him with his pod.

Pegasus Project part 3: In the latest part of our mini-series, Michael Safi hears from Nina Lakhani on how 15,000 Mexicans including journalists and politicians appeared on a list of possible targets for surveillance.

Today in FocusPegasus project part 3

Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen https://audio.guim.co.uk/2020/05/05-61553-gnl.fw.200505.jf.ch7DW.mp3

War may be winding down, but the Syrian economy lies in ruins. And with Bashar al-Assad in charge for seven more years, the country remains splintered. After the president was sworn in following a poll described by Britain and Europe as neither free nor fair, his first foreign guest was Chinas foreign minister, Wang Yi.

Chinas high-visibility stake in postwar Syria is straight from its playbook elsewhere in the Middle East, as well as in Asia and Africa: windfall investments in return for local access and global cover, writes Martin Chulov.

Our Tokyo 2020 newsletter brings you the best of the Olympic and Paralympic buildup and competition. Get ahead of the field by signing up here!

England ended their white-ball summer with yet another series victory after clinching a final-over thriller in this T20 decider against Pakistan by three wickets. Alistair Brownlee has backed the International Olympic Committees decision to proceed with the rescheduled Games amid the Covid-19 pandemic, saying a stripped-back Games will be better than none at all. Giannis Antetokounmpo ended one of the greatest NBA finals ever with 50 points and a championship after his Milwaukee Bucks beat the Phoenix Suns 105-98. The British & Irish Lions have been given a major boost following confirmation that all three Test matches against South Africa will now be played at sea level. Anthony Joshua will defend his WBA, IBF and WBO heavyweight titles against former undisputed world cruiserweight champion Oleksandr Usyk as the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium hosts a boxing event for the first time on 25 September. And revelations made in Mondays Panorama documentary have raised urgent questions for horseracing, writes Greg Wood, and urgent action is needed from the sports authorities in Britain and Ireland.

The price of bitcoin has dipped below $30,000 for the first time in a month after regulators in the US and Europe signalled stricter oversight for cryptocurrencies. The European Commission wants to make companies handling cryptos for clients register their name, address and bank account details, matching rules designed to stamp out money-laundering. US regulators said they were planning tighter rules for stablecoins, digital currencies that are pegged to conventional money. The dollar itself has been stronger, sending the pound to $1.362, while sterling has slipped to 1.156. The FTSE100 is set to rise 0.2% this morning.

The Guardians front page story is that Emmanuel Macron and 13 other heads of state and government are on the leaked Pegasus database. It also reveals that border officials in England are turning a blind eye to Covid border checks. The Daily Telegraph leads on the NHS app, with PM urged to expand Covid app exemptions. It also gives a prominent spot to the UKs decision to pay 55m to French border officials to fund a further clampdown on migration. You can read our story here.

The Times headline on the French border patrols is Migrant crossings into Britain hit new record. The Daily Express has Migrant crisis: Patel pays French 54m to do their job. The FT leads on Brexit as the UK prepares to unveil new demands on trading arrangements. The Independents headline is Industry leaders hit out at ping exemption chaos.

The i reveals that England has three weeks to avoid new Covid restrictions, reporting that Sage scientists have urged ministers to bring back rules early. Pandemic Pandemonium is top of the Mirror, as One million kids off school. Metro leads on the France migration deal with Gunboat diplomacy as does the Daily Mail, with Now Priti channels 54m to France.

Subscribe to the Guardian morning briefing

The Guardian Morning Briefing is delivered to thousands of inboxes bright and early every weekday. If you are not already receiving it by email, you can sign up here.

For more news: http://www.theguardian.com

If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@theguardian.com

See more here:
Wednesday briefing: Tory rebellion brews over vaccine passports - The Guardian

Cartels reap growing profits in the smuggling of migrants across the US-Mexico border – Courier Journal

Karol Surez| Louisville Courier Journal

Jess fled his crisis-plagued birth country of Venezuela for Mexico in 2019, hoping to one day cross the border into America and a more promising future. For two years, hejealouslywatched other migrants make the crossing.

"I was seeing all the migrants crossing in front of my nose, said the 21-year-old,who didnt want to give his last name for fear of legal consequences.I thought: Why wouldn't I, if I'm so close."

Jess spent months trying to find a smuggler to help him make the dangerous journey. But he found it extremely difficult to trust anyone. More often than ever, those smugglers including the one he eventually found are tied to Mexican drug cartels.

Cartels play an increasing role in the surge of migrants fueling the most recent immigration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Experts say theymake big profits helping smuggle people across, and those profits comprise a significant and growing portion of their vast riches.

And some of the money passing hands from migrants to smugglers comes through U.S. banks and financial services such as Western Union.

Jaeson Jones, a retired Texas public safety captain,said theres no way to knowexactly how much cartels earn in the smuggling business.

But I can without any doubt tell you that the profits they are making today are like nothing we have seen prior," he said. "This is a major revenue stream.

Jones saidcartels treat desperate migrants like a commodity.

The majority of the 900,000 migrants who tried to cross into the United States so far this fiscal year are from Central America or Mexico, but a growing number are traveling from South American countries such as Venezuela.

Most pay thousands to get to the United States, and the cartels reap the benefits while also bolstering their power in the region.

"Criminal organizations control the border, so they control who and what crosses the border, said Gary Hale, drug policy fellow at the U.S. Mexico Center at Rice Universitys Baker Institute in Houston. And that becomes a lucrative moneymaker, a revenue generator for these cartels.

More: Drug cartels attack enemies and spread terror with weaponized drones in US, Mexico

Migrants bound for America are seeking refuge, a better life, and to escape threats, poverty and violence. Since President Joe Biden took office, the number crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally has increased exponentially.

In the past, people often braved border crossings without smugglers, who are also known as coyotes or polleros.

Research by theU.S. Office of Immigration Statistics found that smuggler usage rates climbed from less than 50% during the 1970s to 95% for first-time border crossers surveyed in 2006.And the proportion has gotten higher since.

As more migrants used smugglers, cartels became more interested in the business, especially since they were already smuggling drugs across the border.

More: CJNG Mexican cartel boss' daughter, 'La Negra,' sentenced to US prison

Until recently, however, they handled the migrant-smugglingbusiness from afar, separated from the day-to-day operations of the smugglers themselves, Jones said.

Whatwe see now is a much more harmonized cycle occurring," he said. "You see that in the way that they're processing migrants before they cross into the United States putting wristbands on them, for example. They're logging everything about them, that's how they're able to keep them into debt bondage, or thepledge ofservices as security for the repayment of debt in whichthe terms of repayment are unclear and the debt holder keeps control.

Smugglers usually work for an organization or pay a fee to each ganginthe territory they use. Some coyotes don't receive direct money from migrants; in many cases, they're just workers doing their job.

Instead, experts say, the wire transfer or cash paid by those crossing the border which can range from $1,300 to $10,000, depending on the migrants nationality goes mostly to the person in charge of the trafficking business, often a cartel member. Portions of those fees alsogo to corrupt Mexican authorities and government checkpoints or "retenes," located throughout the south of Mexico.

More: California drug ring linked to Ohio officer's killing and Mexico's infamous Sinaloa Cartel

Often, Jones said, the money changing hands comes via U.S. financial institutions.

"We've seen everything from cash to the use of Western Union to wire money, he said. We've also seen the (use) of U.S. banking institutions, creating a bank account in the U.S. where funds are in the bank, and then somebody is pulling those funds out after they're given all the banking information and (a) method to do so."

Jones said its difficult for U.S. authorities to investigate such transactions. It takes time, it takes resources, it takes effort, and by the time you have done (that), they've closed that bank account and moved on to 15 others, he said.

In a statement, officials with the American Bankers Associationsaid banks try to detect and report financial red flags to law enforcement,filingmore than 2.7 million "suspicious activity reports" and 16 million "currency transaction reports" annually with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,a bureau of the U.S. treasury department.

"Banks are absolutely committed to combatting human trafficking and human smuggling and work in close coordination with law enforcement to try and identify those committing these heinous crimes," thestatement said. "These crimes can be very hard to detect, which is why banks also provide extensive training to their employees on how to spot and report unusual transactions or face-to-face customer interactions that may indicate human smuggling or other illicit activities.

Scott Apodaca, head of financial intelligence at Western Union, said his company also tries to combat human smuggling, using"very powerful and innovative technology" to help detect it. He said the company also has a financial intelligence unit thatincludes more than 550 people who hone in on emerging threats and work to prevent related transactions.

By getting into the smuggling business, the cartels have created a vicious cycle. Their main business the drug trade spurs unending violence in the border area. That violence causes more and more migrants to resort to using smugglers because they believe it will keep them safer. All the while, the cartels fortunes and power grow.

But often, smugglers dont make migrants safer. Quite the opposite.

In early February, a 911 call prompted an extensive search in the San Antonio, Texas, area after a man saying he and other 80 migrants were trapped in a tanker truck, struggling to breathe. After a long search, the tanker was never found.

Migrants have been killed or kidnapped for not paying a fee to cross a territory controlled by an organized crime group. In February, The Courier Journal traveled to Guatemala to meet the family of a young man killed with 18 other migrants whose charred bodies were found inside two vans in the town of Santa Anita in Camargo, the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, barely 50 miles from the U.S. border.

The investigation is still ongoing.

Venezuelan migrant Jess, and his sister, were willing to face the dangers for a chance to live in the United States. Millions of people from Venezuela takesuch chances.According to the United Nations'refugee agency, at least 5.6 million Venezuelans have left the country since 2005 to escape violence, insecurity, and threats, as well as a longstanding economic crisis that has led to a lack of food, medicinesand essential services.

We decided it was time to leave, Jess told The Courier Journal.

He hoped to get to Miami, Florida, where many relatives lived. Victor Hernndez, his cousin, paid $3,500 to the coyote to cross him and his sister through Ciudad Acua, a border city with Del Rio, Texas. The coyote was another Venezuelan.

When Hernandez asked for the information to make the payment, he said the coyote sent him many options for remittance companies, which transfer money from one account to another, to wire money to Mexico; as well as U.S. bank accounts.Hernandez was wary of U.S. companies because he was living in Miami with an asylum case open and knew he was paying for an illegal service.

"It was easier for me to pay with the U.S. method, but for my own protection, I made an international wire transfer to Mexico, he said. But I know people that have sent the money to those bank accounts."

Messages broadcasted to the publicin WhatsApp chat groups show the costs to cross from Venezuela to the United States. One said: "At this moment it's difficult to get into Mexico, that's why we have the safe pass to enter Mexico, $1,300, after entering Mexico you'll have to pay another $1,300 to cross through the river or $1,600 through the wall. Payment methods: wire transfers and cash only."

After leaving at 2 a.m. for the trip from Monterrey to Ciudad Acua, Mexico, Jess and his sister were driven to a remote location on a Friday afternoon until the coyote showed up and asked them to follow him.

They followed a rough road and ran many times until they found the borderline. Before crossing the Rio Granderiver, they were asked by coyotes to throw their cellphones into the water.

Jess and his sister crossed the river and were detained minutes later by the border patrol officers in U.S. territory.

Hernndez waited seven days to hear from Jess, who called from a detention center in San Antonio, Texas.

I felt relieved, Hernndez said.

After 25 "traumatic" days detained, Jess and his sister were released from the detention center, where he said he was well treated but suffered psychological damage because he felt suchuncertainty about the future.

Hes now living in Miami. His first hearing with ICE is scheduled for October 13, and he hopes to be able to stay.

"Now that I know how's life here, I'd do it again, he said. However, I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. Its atoughpath."

Karol Surez is a Venezuela-born journalist based out of Mexico City.

Read more:
Cartels reap growing profits in the smuggling of migrants across the US-Mexico border - Courier Journal

6 ‘Dystopian’ Ideas the UK Has Actually Considered to Stop Refugee Boats Arriving – Global Citizen

From water cannons in the English channel to a processing centre in Rwanda.

Over the course of the last year, the UK Home Office has been brainstorming ways to deal with the refugee crisis and it looks like almost everything is on the table.

But instead of working on how to better offer sanctuary, save lives, or successfully integrate refugees into British life, the government department led by Priti Patel has instead been plotting prison islands, containment ships, and weapons to deter migrant dinghies.

Reports have been circling since August 2020 of ideas to make the English Channel an unviable route for asylum seekers, some condemned as unlawful, reckless, and dangerous.

And on Monday, Patel was making headlines once more as news broke of her plan to set up a processing facility for asylum seekers arriving in Britain based thousands of miles away in Rwanda.

This is where we are. Despite the global refugee crisis, it is a myth to suggest that there is a refugee crisis in the UK. There are not many refugees in the UK just 0.2% of the total population as of 2019 and the UK receives far fewer asylum applications than its neighbours.

According to UNHCR, the United Nations refugee agency, the UK received 31,752 asylum applications in the year ending September 2020, almost five times less than Germany (155,295), and much less than France (129,480) and Spain (128,520) too.

However Britain, instead of taking its fair share of refugees, has been coming up with ways to avoid responsibility. Here are some of the grotesquely inhumane ideas that the Home Office has genuinely been considering in just the last year alone.

Next week, Patel willreportedlybring aNationality and Borders Bill to parliament.

In the event such legislation is passed into law, it would allow her to set up an offshore processing centre to hold asylum seekers in Rwanda.Its thought that the processing centre will be shared with Denmark, another countryrecently condemned for being the first European country to revoke refugee status for 200 Syrians, including teenagers who had been in Denmark for many years, arguing that their war-torn home country was now safe to return to.

Australiahas implemented "offshore processing" since 2012 where refugees arriving by boat are intercepted and told to turn back, or be taken to a third country, namely Nauruor Manus Island in Papua New Guinea, while their claim for asylum is processed.

The UK plan has been described as barbaric and cowardly by Tim Naor Hilton, chief executive at Refugee Action, while the Refugee Council called it an act of cruel and brutal hostility. It was widely condemned as dystopian, with Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesperson, saying it would be an appalling and inhumane way to treat some of the worlds most vulnerable people.

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council charity, said: Offshore processing is an act of cruel and brutal hostility towards vulnerable people who through no fault of their own have had to flee war, oppression, and terror.

The idea was to buy retired ferries and convert them into floating processing centres.

The ships, moored off the English coast, would hold asylum seekers while they waited for their applications to be dealt with. Along a similar vein, another thought was that migrants could be processed on decommissioned oil platforms in the North Sea, according to the Times.

Eventually it was deemed a no go after being discussed in a Whitehall brainstorming session.

But as were about to find out, not all binned ideas find themselves banished for eternity

The Rwanda centre is merely the latest iteration of an idea that was pitched, and scrapped, between September and October 2020.

Initially, "detailed plans were drawn up to build detention camps on either Ascension Island or Saint Helena, British Overseas Territories based just off the western coast of Africa. Islands around Moldova, Morocco, and Papua New Guinea were also considered.

But there was a huge public backlash. The idea was described as entirely immoral and inhumane by campaigners. Eventually, the plan was shelved for nine months, at least.

The governments speculative plans to round up human beings and confine them to prison boats or camps on remote islands are inhumane and morally bankrupt, said Stephen Hale, chief executive of Refugee Action. Britain is better than this.

Hale added: We need a fair and effective asylum system, based on compassion, safety, and the rule of law.

A leaked document from last summer showed that the Home Office reached out to Maritime UK, a trade body, asking for tips on how to build temporary "marine fencing" in the English Channel.

The Financial Times first broke the story, reporting that they had seen an email requesting advice on how to "prevent a slow-moving, heavily overloaded migrant boat from making progress". But Maritime UK said that the idea was "not legally possible" under terms set out in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea.

Apparently the barriers would be set up "on the median line" between British and French waters, with technology that was "rapidly deployable and rapidly removable."

In the news around the Rwanda processing centre, the statistics around migrants arriving in the UK on small boats approximately 5,700 in 2021 so far have been put forward as something Prime Minister Boris Johnson is actively concerned about.

As weve already established, this is a miniscule proportion of the number of asylum applications made to other countries. But in 2018, it led to former home secretary Sajid Javid declaring a major incident. It has since frequently been portrayed as an escalating emergency.

Last year, the BBC and Sky were accused of "voyeurism" after they sent reporters to chase some of these dinghies in their own boats, described by one MP as like "grotesque reality TV". To further add to the hysteria, government rhetoric has grown increasingly bombastic.

Which led to this idea: water cannons in the English Channel to create actual waves that might repel migrant boats before they can land in the UK. Seriously.

Last but not least, there was the whole warship debacle.

In August 2020, Patel requested support from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to prevent migrants crossing the English Channel, and appointed an ex-royal marine as a "clandestine channel threat commander."

Among the critics of the idea to send in the military to deal with migrants were people within the MoD itself, with one source reportedly calling it a completely inappropriate and disproportionate approach to take."

In the end, navy ships werent called in. But judging by the return of the Rwanda processing centre, it might be naive to believe the idea may never come back.

View original post here:
6 'Dystopian' Ideas the UK Has Actually Considered to Stop Refugee Boats Arriving - Global Citizen

The Irony of Being Undocumented – The Atlantic

The last time a Democrat lived in the White House, I was nearly detained outside of its gates. It should have been obvious to me, an undocumented immigrant, that giving my blank passport to a Secret Service agent could get me in trouble.

But I, along with a classmate, had been asked to be there for a meeting about college access hosted by first lady Michelle Obamas higher-education initiative, and my security form had cleared the night before. And this was America, where immigrants supposedly could do such things as become senators and secretaries of state, and get invited to meetings at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, within the White House complex.

Predictably, the Secret Service agent told me that I was not on the list and that I should reach out to my point of contact inside. Ill catch up with you, I told my friend, knowing that I wouldnt. After about an hour of waiting, one of the hosts appeared, and told me that he was so sorry and that he would call me later. You didnt tell me you were undocumented! he said, stunned, over the phone.

I took my burgundy Venezuelan passport and walked away, breathing in the peculiar blend of hope for Hillary Clinton and trepidation about Donald Trump that already filled the D.C. air in March 2016. The Secret Service that protected the man who lived in the White Housewho often used his ancestors immigrant stories to wax poetic about this countrycould have just as easily sent me to detention that day.

The current White House occupant also claims to be on immigrants side, decrying in his inaugural address the racism, nativism, fear, and demonization that have long torn us apart. The presidency of Joe Biden has brought, as promised, a clean break from some of Trumps pernicious policies, such as the travel ban and the assault on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. On his first day in office, Biden sent an immigration bill to Congress that expanded temporary status protections and provided a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants. The House of Representatives subsequently passed a pair of narrower bills that would protect about 2.5 million Dreamers, as well as farmworkers.

The real bargaining over our lives, in the Senate, is yet to come. As groundbreaking as Bidens sweeping immigration-reform proposal looks, I have seen bills like it get killed in the Senate, revived as amendments to some military-spending bill, then killed again, more times than I can count. Even if immigration relief efforts are broken up piece by piece, which some have suggested Biden is open to doing, each morsel that does get through Congress will likely come with the bitter pill of increased deportations or border militarization. And, in the meantime, the Biden administration continues housing unaccompanied migrant children in border facilities and deporting individuals under Title 42, a public-health law.

Adam Serwer: The sinister logic of Trumps immigration freeze

The end of the Trump presidency may create the impression that Americas immigration cruelty is a thing of the past. In truth, those of us who were undocumented before Trump know the inhumanity of that precarious normalcy.

To immigrants, papers are everything. They can also mean nothing.

For how often my community gets called undocumented, perhaps no one in this country possesses more documents, or clings to them more fiercely to prove their existence, than we do. Practically every immigrant family in this country has a thick folder padded with their most valued documentssome put them in a safe box; others make virtual copies that they upload to encrypted cloud servers. Even vaccination charts or a spelling-bee certificate can prove something. I keep my papers in a yellow manila envelope.

For most of the pandemic, the folded-up piece of paper that allows me to board a plane and travel domestically resided in the inside pocket of a green coat I bought in college. That paper is a press release from the State Department, on which I conveniently highlighted the sentence that keeps an immigration agent at an airport from whisking me away: Venezuelan passport holders who have been issued a passport extension will have the validity period extended by five years from the expiration date.

Most Venezuelans who live in the United States have not been able to get a new passport since the Maduro regime stopped issuing them to those living abroad in 2017 (though extensions were possible), and this press release was, until recently, the only thing that kept undocumented Venezuelans from being rendered functional exiles without a country.

When I fly to see family, I tuck this press release, along with my boarding pass, into my passport, as if to say, I know its expired. Its all I have. I hand this apology to the TSA agent, who decides whether to ask about my immigration status, or, as usually happens, wave me through.

Recently, I arrived at Reagan National Airport for my first flight since the pandemic began. I began to worry as soon as I turned a corner and saw that the TSA line was empty; behind plexiglass was a woman who had the power to decide whether I would get to see my family. Noticing that my passport had expired, she asked whether I had an extension. I awkwardly unfolded the press release, my voice shaking as I tried to explain State Department policy over her evident frustration. She seemed to study every comma. Finally she said, Let me see your face. My two masks chafed my ears as I pulled them down. She slid the paper and the passport back to me in silence, and I somehow got out a relieved Have a good one, before rushing to the conveyor belts.

Most of my other papersbank statements, school transcripts, a copy of my birth certificateare in the manila envelope. Even papers with no legal value at all are beloved, such as the birthday card I got from a scholarship foundation years ago, or the expired Capitol Hill press pass from my days as a news intern.

But for all the papers I could produce to show my contributions, none of them could secure a stable life. As anyone who has tried to come to the United States knows, its immigration system is arbitrary and often contradictory; being legal or documented depends not on the number of papers you possess, but on which ones you have. The Obama administration, when creating DACA, required applicants to have lived in the United States since June 15, 2007, to qualify; I arrived from Venezuela in 2011, so DACA did nothing for me. I could not be employed; could not legally drive in Florida, where I lived; and could not apply for federal or state financial aid to attend college. Theres no apparent justification for this date. I remember watching President Barack Obama announce on television in November 2014, around the time that I was applying to college, that he would expand DACAand that immigrants could apply if they had lived here since January 1, 2010. I had missed that cutoff, again, by a little over a year. I cried.

From the April 2019 issue: If liberals wont enforce borders, fascists will

With DACA out of reach, I believed that I had three options to obtain legal status, none of them viable. If I were to be the victim of certain crimes, such as sexual assault or human trafficking, I could opt for a U visa. (Quite obviously, I did not want to be the victim of such a crime, nor was it up to me anyway.) Alternatively, if the U.S. government deemed the crisis in Venezuela bad enough, I could qualify for temporary forms of relief such as Temporary Protected Status or Deferred Enforced Departure. Or there was always the possibility of marrying a U.S. citizen. This is doubtless the most pragmatic approach, and one that many immigrants successfully take. As the child of separated parents, though, I was waryterrified, honestlyof hinging my future on the unpredictable whims of a partner. (The naturalization process dictates that a couple be married for at least three years before the immigrant spouse can receive permanent residence.)

I suppose that waiting for a government response that may never come is choosing a more perverse kind of ghosting. Every visa program forces immigrants to fit into arbitrary but neatly delineated categories. Years of bipartisan collaboration have spawned a byzantine system that assigns such great weight to something so weightless as paper, betraying any understanding of the reasons people migrate or become undocumented. Inaction had already begotten this structure before Trump came to power.

I landed in Miami on July 3, 2011, when I was 14 years old, without knowing that I would stay. That was the summer when Mitt Romney launched his presidential run, Casey Anthony was acquitted of murder, and Janet Napolitano, then Obamas secretary of homeland security, announced that the administration would shift its deportation priorities to target criminals and people who otherwise posed a threat to national security or public safety. The journalist Jose Antonio Vargas had just come out as undocumented in a New York Times Magazine feature two Wednesdays before I arrived.

My father had moved to Orlando, Florida, with his wife and their two children two years earlier, fleeing death threats and crime in Venezuela. He had been able to secure legal status through a business visa. I saw no future for myself in Venezuela, where Id been living with my mother, so, during my visit, I told my father that I wanted to go to college in the United States. He took me to meet a family friend whose son was a student at Florida State University at the time, and I remember his exact advice: Now would be the best time to stay. I was about to start my freshman year of high school. I asked my father to call my motherI didnt have the heart to tell her that her son was not coming back home. Because of a 1982 Supreme Court decision that guarantees access to public education to all children, regardless of immigrant status, I started high school in Florida that August, gaining legal status under my fathers visa as a family member.

Otherwise, this countrys laws soon dashed our hopes. When my father tried to apply for green cards, the Department of Homeland Security determined that his role as the owner of his cellphone business was too operational and not sufficiently managerial. The application was denied. He grew desperate to deliver on a promise he had made to himself when he left Venezuela: that he would make sure we had a future.

Caitlin Dickerson: Americas immigration amnesia

Later that year, my father met a DHS agent. She spoke Spanish, worked for our gated communitys property-management company, and had attended Mass at the same Orlando church we went to. She said she could help us appeal our denied green cards. The lawyer had made some obvious mistakes, and with just a few tweaks, our immigration case would be open and shut.

Because we had had the privilege of immigrating legally, in the eyes of the law we were good immigrants. That year, the government reached a record number of deportations, having removed almost 400,000 people who presumably werent.

I still remember the muggy summer night in 2012 when, as a high-school sophomore, I held a letter with the official DHS seal saying that our appeal had been approved and our green cards would arrive within 45 to 120 days. The evidence submitted with your Application on December 29, 2011 is been audited to establish your eligibility for the benefits sought, it read, awkwardly. I did not yet know enough English to recognize that the sentences grammar was wrong.

The summer days went by, and the agent stopped returning our calls. The last we heard from her, in 2013, she was going on an emergency trip to New York to take care of her sick daughter. It became obvious that the letter I translated in my parents minivan that night was fake, and that the person who gave it to us was not an immigration agent. Our visas had already expired. We were left undocumented.

We later learned that this person had stolen tens of thousands of dollars from at least 10 different families in the Orlando area. We met some of them and, one day, my father said we had to go to the Orange County Sheriffs Office to file a report. Because we had lost approximately $6,000 in this scheme, and the agent had often asked us to pay up or wed be deported, we argued that our case qualified as extortion, one of the crimes covered under the U-visa category.

I wrote pages and pages of a witness statement at the police station, until we needed scrap paper and my wrist was sore. It was my first argument for freedom.

To be able to submit our application for approval, we needed a law-enforcement official to sign a form attesting that we had been helpful in the investigation of the case. At the station, my father feared that our information would be used to deport, not help, us. We came to the wolfs mouth, I recall him saying. In a letter from May 2014, the sheriffs office wrote that although we had cooperated with the investigation, the crime committed is not a qualifying offense. No police officer ended up signing the application.

A signaturea mere scribbleis what has kept us from our peace. We had no other redress.

By the end of the Obama administrationthe old normalthe 44th president had deported more than 3 million immigrants. Holding facilities for unaccompanied children dotted the border. Blimps and drones patrolled the skies in search of crossers.

Then Trump came, exposing our immigration systems capacity for evil when used with intention. The prohibition of travel from Muslim-majority countries; the raids at workplaces such as 7-Elevens and poultry-processing plants; the wanton separation of families; the termination of Temporary Protected Status for countries mired in humanitarian crises; the delegitimization of birthright citizenship; the extreme reduction of refugee intake numbers; the since-defeated rule that an immigrant could be denied a visa based on the likelihood that they would become a public charge to the government; the attempted rescission of DACA; and the alleged coercion of detained women into receiving hysterectomies all forced activists, scholars, and even elected officials to confront the possibility that Immigration and Customs Enforcement may need to be outright abolished. Then-Senator Kamala Harris cautiously urged her colleagues to think about starting from scratch on immigration enforcement the summer before entering the Democratic presidential primary.

The bedlam of 2016 led me to become a journalist. The act of writing required no papers. If the odds that I would obtain status had become even slimmer, my bylines at least could prove that I was here. I worked internship after unpaid internship, applying to as many scholarships as I could so that I could afford to get by. I opted out of tours of the White House press room, recalling that March morning.

Like many other journalists of color, I have straddled the line of wanting to give better representation to my community but being deemed too close to the facts to be unbiased. One newsroom explicitly told me that allowing me to intern with them would pose the threat of compromising us legally and journalistically. Papers are somehow also a talisman of neutrality.

One notable advance in immigrant rights during the Trump years was the passage of state laws and local policies allowing some undocumented immigrants to acquire drivers licenses, shielding them from traffic violations that sent many to ICE detention. In 2018, fearing I might not be able to replace my passport as Venezuela slipped further into mayhem, I tried to get a D.C. ID card. In doing so, I nearly lost everything.

I have a habit of losing things: an umbrella in an Uber, my cellphone on a ride at Universal Studios, my computer and camera at a Miami mall (almost). Ive always comforted myself with the convenient truth that material possessions are, at the end of the day, always replaceable. But not all papers are.

After my third failed attempt (the D.C. DMV kept insisting that my time living on campus could not fulfill the six-month residency requirement), I went into a Peets Coffee to call the universitys undocumented-student-services director, whod been helping me with the process. Two days later, after likely hundreds of customers had passed through the shop, I jolted awake, realizing that I hadnt brought my envelope back to my dorm with me. Gone with it would be dozens of pages of documents, the only government documents I had to show that I was here, in this country, at this moment. We tend to forget that even our birth has to be certified, and I was facing the possibility that I might never be able to see that piece of paper again.

I ran back. By some miracle, somebody had returned the lost papers to the cashier, who had put them in the coffee shops basement for safekeeping. Handing the folder back to me, the manager said, You should be careful with those. I felt, for the first time, the terror of a reality that had haunted me for yearsthat one small misstep could thrust my life into chaos.

Over the following months, I resolved to study law because the law had failed me. Without a work authorization, I could not be hired full-time anywhere, and law school gave me a much-needed safety net while also allowing me to confront the ancient doctrines that deemed me alien.

I came across the case of Fong Yue Ting, a Chinese immigrant who was arrested and deported because he did not have a certificate of residence, as the Geary Act (an extension of the Chinese Exclusion Act) required. With its decision in this case, the Supreme Court in 1893 cemented the governments plenary power to expel immigrants. Deportation, the Court said, was not a punishment for crime, but merely a way of enforcing the power of Congress and the president to place conditions on immigrants continued residence here. He has not, therefore, been deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, Justice Horace Gray wrote. Equal rights, the law says, do not belong equally to us. And yet here I was, proof of the laws obsolescence.

From the May 2021 issue: America never wanted the tired, poor, huddled masses

Unbeknownst to me, a momentary reprieve was coming.

On the last full day of Trumps presidency, with less than 24 hours of his term left, Trump decided to grant Venezuelans work permits and protection from deportation through Deferred Enforced Departure, citing the deteriorative condition of Venezuela caused by the autocratic government of Nicolas Maduro. That the most virulently anti-immigrant administration in recent memory would be the one to release me from the constant anxiety of being alien in the eyes of the law tasted of a bittersweet irony immigrants know well, in our worlds of contradiction.

I knew that reality would change little. For days before the memorandum came out, my corner of D.C. had been overrun by armored vehicles, soldiers, local cops, and even Border Patrol agents, following the insurrection at the Capitol. Crossing the street meant having to decide whether acknowledging or ignoring the officers would raise fewer questions. I stopped walking the dog alone.

Id learned to temper any high hopes I had for the government. Despite whatever mercy Trump may have thought he was showing at the eleventh hour, my rights were still subject to the whims of any federal agent until I had the proper papers in my hand. Trumps DHS never published any guidance on how to apply for this temporary status, so it helped nobody.

But on March 8, Biden actually delivered a long-awaited reprieve to undocumented Venezuelans. Fresh off the Senates approval of the stimulus bill, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas announced that he would be extending Temporary Protected Status to Venezuelans who already lived here while their home country seeks to right itself out of the current crises. The formal guidance came out the next day. For Haitians, who have also been battling a humanitarian crisis and this administrations own deportations, TPS relief did not come until May 22, after months of advocacy.

That Monday, the happy result of Washingtons political game was another press release that granted me rights slightly more permanently, until September 2022 for now.

In a few months, Ill have status. But who wont? And why me?

See original here:
The Irony of Being Undocumented - The Atlantic

Who is looking out for migrant workers during the Covid-19 crisis? – The Times of India Blog

A day in the life of a volunteer at a collective that is providing relief and advocating for systemic change for migrant workers.

My name is Gayatri Sahgal and I am a PhD student at Wolfson College, University of Oxford. Last year, when the first few lockdowns were imposed globally to contain the spread of Covid-19, I was unable to travel back to the United Kingdom and had to stay back in India. While looking for ways to help the situation here, a close friend of mineAnindita Adhikarisuggested I join theStranded Workers Action Network(SWAN).

SWAN was set up in March 2020, when Anindita, Seema Mundoli, Rajendran Narayan, and many others came together to form a collective of volunteers to organise relief for workers stranded in cities due to the national lockdown.

At SWAN, I manage the needs assessment team with another colleague. This team works across four zonesnorth, south, east, and westand comprises volunteers and zonal coordinators. The volunteers are responsible for managing calls, while the coordinators oversee operations and day-to-day collation of incoming data.

Related article: Envisioning equitable access to justice for migrant workers in India

8:00 AM:Since Ive started working with SWAN, I always wake up to a steady stream of messages being exchanged between team members.Over the past few weeks, weve worked on decentralising the process of managing calls that we receive from workers. Initially, we were directly getting calls on our numbers, which were being circulated. Now, weve set up helpline numbers that are manned by volunteers. When somebody calls the helpline, they are directed to a volunteer who takes note of their requirements and assessestheir needs by asking them certain questions using a standardised needs assessment form.

While I usually dont take calls directly anymore, today I woke up to a call from a worker who Id spoken to in April. I had helped him secure rations by connecting him to a nonprofit that was distributing rations in his area, in Jharkhand. This morning, however, he called to ask if SWAN can arrange some money for his family of four. Upon checking our records, I realise that we have already made three micro-transfers to him, which is where we tend to cap it. But as he seems to be in need of some immediate funds, I decide to forward his call to the money transfer team to do the needful.

9:00 AM:After a quick breakfast, I spend a few hours on my PhD work. My research focuses on the political economy of fragile contexts, specifically in the Horn of Africa region. It takes me a while to completely switch off and concentrate on my researchthe devastating situation at hand is always playing at the back of my mind.

Once I wrap up my research work, I get ready for a day of meetings and calls.

11:30 AM:I log on for a meeting with SWANs content team that is working on messaging around vaccine hesitancy and precautions for COVID-19. Compared to last year, in 2021 we have also been focussing on collecting data and gathering feedback from workers on the actual situation on the ground. This helps the team plan campaigns better. Simultaneously, the content team also works with a network of nonprofits that are developing vaccine awareness campaigns.

During the meeting, the needs assessment team shares the feedback they have received from the workers. Drawing on this information, we discuss the messaging that needs to be crafted to be shared with our database of workers.

Related article: The issue is exploitation, not migration

1:00 PM:I sit down to finish drafting a section of a report that captures the impact of the second wave on workers.

Since the first lockdown was imposed, we have gathered a lot of data through the calls we have received. However, with this report, our objective is to go beyond the numbers and the data collected. We want to present the lived experiences of workers who, in less than a year, have had to face two successive crises of livelihoods that have dented their savings and income.

We have also observed certain patterns across the calls weve been receiving and realised that the nature of calls has evolved over the course of the year. These days the workers are very disheartened, even more so than last year. Nobody really cares about us. They dont really take us into consideration when they make policies, is a common refrain across calls. Which is why, in the report, we have decided that we want to capture their messages, the pictures they send in, and other material that can be used to effectively communicate the larger story of the crisis.

Covid-19 has revealed a massive systematic problem. Through this report, SWAN is also trying to make this appeal that more needs to be done, because what has been done until now has just been completely insufficient.

4:00 PM:I join the weekly core group meeting. These meetings have become even more important as the situation is evolving daily. SWANs core group comprises members who oversee the daily operations of different teams. These meetings are usually more strategic, with the agenda laid out in advance. Some action points for today include discussing the status of the report, the feedback shared by our volunteers at our last all-volunteer meet, and how we can engage better with the government machinery to advocate for change on the ground.

We start by going over the report in detaildiscussing which parts to keep, and which can be left out to be used as stand-alone pieces, so on and so forth.

While providing immediate relief to workers is central to what we do at SWAN, this year we have gone a step further and worked on advocacy. The report is one part of our advocacy agenda. Another aspect of it is holding governments accountable for the relief measures that they have announced. For example, in April 2021, when the second wave had hit its peak in New Delhi, we started receiving a barrage of calls from the capital. Upon investigating further, we came to know that the Delhi government had announced some steps to manage the situation on ground, such as a labour helpline and an information desk. Upon calling the labour helpline, we found that it was meant for employers and not for workers. The other helpline that was supposed to be for ration distribution was only coordinating the distribution of cooked food, and even the operators themselves seemed to be uninformed. Based on our findings, we drafted a letter to the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister. We followed this up with a Twitter campaign asking them for a status on all the points raised in the letter. Eventually, the Delhi government announced that they were arranging for ration to be distributed.

To pick out any such similar patterns in the calls we have been receiving, we go over the feedback we have collected from various teams during our meeting.We discuss the need to engage with the official machinery further and steps we can take to raise our concerns, while proactively working with them on solutions.

Another important aspect we discuss is the SWAN fellowship programme, which allows SWANs work to continue beyond its current structure. As a part of the fellowship, six migrant workers, who have been selected as SWAN fellows, get a platform to record and document their experiences and help other migrant workers get access to government schemes. These fellows can then further mobilise other networks of migrant workers, and collect data from them in order to amplify their collective appeals to the government.

When SWAN was set up, the intention was to fill gaps in the system and not do the work that the governments were supposed to or what the nonprofits were already doing. As we discuss the decreasing volume of calls and wrapping up operations for SWAN during the meeting, we also talk about ways in which we can strengthen the SWAN fellowship programme to enable our fellows to keep the momentum going.The meeting goes on for three hours.

8:00 PM:After a quick dinner, I go over all the action points for work tomorrow. Before calling it a night, I check in with all the zonal managers to see if they had any issues during their workday or came across any case that needs urgent attention.

As told to IDR.

This article was originally published on India Development Review.

Views expressed above are the author's own.

END OF ARTICLE

Go here to see the original:
Who is looking out for migrant workers during the Covid-19 crisis? - The Times of India Blog