Mediaboss Marketing

The National Security Agencys chief information officer may be unsure of what theyre supposed to be doing with attention being pulled disproportionately toward cybersecurity issues, according to the agencys inspector general.

The Agencys CIO role is ambiguous, without clearly defined authorities and responsibilities, the OIG wrote in the semi-annual report released Thursday, which otherwise gives NSA a pat on the back for implementing its recommendations.

The IG audited the agency for compliance with Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 and an Office of Management and Budget memorandum, documents that describe the CIO role and responsibilities for budget, program and workforce management as well as overseeing information security.

Examining the implementation of an enterprise IT architecture program and the CIOs placement within the NSAs management structure, the IG said the agency and the CIO made substantial progress, but there were a few attention-grabbing reasons they noted as contributing to shortfalls.

These were dual hatting the functions of the CIO with those of an NSA Directorate, a lack of documentation for the delegation of authorities, failure to include the CIO role in agencyorganization charts, and agency communications that reinforced the CIOs authorities primarily for the information security component.

The CIO has the requisite oversight of and decision rights for all Agency IT, the IG explains, noting, The issues identified in this audit increase the risk that the agency ...may not be maximizing its effectiveness and efficiency in designing, investing in, acquiring, managing, and maintaining the full range of its IT.

The report said the IG made four recommendations to address the issue, and that the NSA has sufficiently addressed one of those, with actions planned to implement the other three.

In general, though, the IG reports the NSAs overdue recommendations for the period of April through September represented 59% of the total number of open recommendations, which was the lowest percentage of open recommendations that were overdue over the past four semi-annual reports.

This reflects significant progress, but there is still substantial work to be done, according to the latest report.

The OIG is now evaluating NSAs implementation of the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014. That audit will focus specifically on assessing the agencys information security practices.

Link:
Unclear NSA CIO Role Puts the Agency's IT at Risk, IG Says - Nextgov

FT. MEADE, Md. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Illinois) is one of the first universities to partner with NSA on researching the science of security and has been working on cybersecurity problems with NSA for more than 19 years.

As one of the initial schools to be designated to host an NSA Science of Security (SoS) Lablet, Illinois has been instrumental in stimulating basic research to create scientific underpinnings for security and advocating for scientific rigor in security research, said NSA Deputy Director George Barnes. The Illinois SoS Lablet builds on a long history in developing science upon which systems might be engineered.

To celebrate this partnership, NSA has named Illinois as a featured schooland ishighlighting the collaboration on NSA.gov, IntelligenceCareers.gov, and on social media beginning January 23, 2020.

As a public comprehensive research university, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign has an opportunity and responsibility to advance our society, said Illinois Chancellor Robert Jones. We are honored to be named a National Security Agency Featured School, and we look forward to continuing to partner to develop the talent and tools needed for our national security challenges.

The partnership began in 2000 when Illinois was designated as a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense(CAE-CD), a program now jointly sponsored by NSA and the Department of Homeland Security. That program, along with a CAE-Research designation, which Illinois received in 2008, promotes higher education and research in the critical area of cybersecurity.

At about the same time NSA researchers began collaborating with Illinois faculty and students in support of broad cybersecurity and assurance goals, to include research in programming languages and system verification in support of systems analysis.

This early work with Illinois led to valued capability developments that are still in use within NSA and partner federal agencies today, said Mr. Brad Martin, Illinois Academic Liaison.

In 2011, Illinois became one of just three universities to host a SoS Lablet. Dr. David Nicol, a professor at Illinois, has been involved in the lablet since the beginning and appreciates the fact that NSA has been investing in research at the early conceptual stages.

I was pleased that the problem of viewing the scientific basis for security was being taken seriously, he said. Its commendable that NSA recognized this issue and invested resources in studying it.

NSA has also awarded Illinois more than $600,000 in grants over the last five years and has hosted a number of summer interns from the university. Currently, two students at Illinois are in the Stokes Educational Scholarship Program, which recruits students, particularly minorities, who have demonstrated skills critical to NSA. The students receive up to $30,000 a year toward their college education and commit to summer internships and six years of agency employment following graduation.

Currently 115 Illinois graduates with degrees at all levels in areas from mathematics to Russian work at NSA.We have many talented employees at NSA who have come from Illinois, said Ms. Kathy Hutson, NSAs Senior Strategist for Academic Engagement. We are so pleased with the partnership we have forged with the university and what it has yielded for NSA.

Illinois is the fifth university to be named an NSA Featured School. The series highlights schools designated as CAEs that have a depth and breadth of engagement with the Agency.

The rest is here:
NSA and University of Illinois: Partnering to Secure Networks and Cyber Systems - Illinois Computer Science News

But a newfound appetite for curtailing U.S. surveillance practices has emerged among Republicans who have criticized the FBIs eavesdropping of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, making them willing to buck the Trump administrations demands that the program be permanently extended.

And intelligence officials arent making the case to keep to phone records program, either. Theyve previously admitted it has become too technically complex a burden to maintain.

Longtime privacy advocates on the Hill are seizing on this momentum to kill the program theyve argued is ineffective and violates Americans rights before the statute authorizing it expires on March 15.

This is a big moment for reformers, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who is looking to push for greater surveillance changes given this new climate in Congress, told POLITICO this month.

Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the panels top Democrat, introduced legislation that would render the program essentially inoperable while renewing the laws other surveillance authorities predominantly used by the FBI for another eight years.

I plan to propose to leadership that we move, in some fashion, [our] bill, Burr said.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), whose panel held a contentious public hearing with an NSA official who couldnt offer examples of the program helping in terror probes, said the proposed legislation works for him.

Meanwhile, in the Democrat-controlled House, the Judiciary and Intelligence committees have been working together for months on a bill that would pull the plug on the surveillance tool once and for all.

The panels are writing a proposal that will both renew authorities necessary to the protection of national security, while also bolstering additional privacy and transparency safeguards where appropriate, a senior Democratic House Intelligence Committee official told POLITICO.

Obviously, time is of the essence, and we hope to come to [a] consensus in the coming month or so, the official added.

A House Democratic aide said the program was built to address an adversary and a technological gap that existed 25 years ago, but times have changed. Bad guys don't use landlines to talk to each other anymore The technology is different. It is less valuable to us today than it was than it would have been in 2001 when they needed it.

But a critical player is Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has yet to indicate he would buck the White House over the intelligence tool. A McConnell spokesperson declined to comment, and a spokesperson for the National Security Council did not respond to a request for comment from POLITICO about the broad resistance from Congress.

The NSA gained the ability to access and analyze Americans domestic calling records shortly after 9/11. Established in secret, the program was designed to vacuum up metadata the numbers and time stamps for calls or text messages but not the actual content so the agency could sift for links among possible associates of terror suspects.

The Snowden leaks eventually forced the Obama administration and Congress to settle on a new law, the USA Freedom Act, that ended NSAs bulk phone collection but allowed the records to be retained by telephone companies and accessed by the federal government with court approval.

Problems with the revised system began to emerge publicly in 2018 when the NSA announced it had uncovered technical irregularities that caused it to collect more phone records than it had legal authority to gather. The agency dumped its entire collection of phone records. However, the problem soon resurfaced, according to an inspector general report.

The recurring compliance headaches around the program, its negative association with Snowden and an inability by intelligence leaders to offer concrete examples of its value in fighting terrorism led a spectrum of observers including former and current intelligence officials to question if the scaled down system was worth keeping at all.

The administration had been quiet about its intentions for the future of the program. Thats a contrast to 2017 when the White House and the intelligence community successfully pressed lawmakers to renew a separate set of warrantless programs that intercept digital traffic of foreign targets while collecting personal information on Americans.

In March, a senior congressional aide revealed that the NSA had deactivated the domestic surveillance program. Then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats confirmed that fact in a letter to Congress in August, which acknowledged that the system has been indefinitely shut down but still asked lawmakers to extend its legal basis.

On Capitol Hill, the urge to strike the program from the books only grew. But in December, lawmakers were forced to include language in a stopgap government funding bill that punted the deadline for the surveillance programs by 90 days, until March 15.

The move was made, in part, because the House impeachment inquiry dominated much of the congressional calendar and to wait for potentially consider additional surveillance reforms, some of which were highlighted by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitzs review of the FBIs handling of its investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016.

A lot of very smart people had a notion that it would be a bad idea for us to pass a bill the first week of December and to have an IG report detailing the inner depths of the FISA process come out the second week of December and then look foolish, the House Democratic aide told POLITICO.

The aide said that on big ticket questions there isnt a lot of daylight between the existing Senate bill and the one that will be produced by the House Judiciary and Intelligence panels, though an eight-year extension of the other authorities isnt likely to pass the lower chamber.

Other issues could also complicate the short window left for lawmakers to take up the surveillance law.

This week, Wyden and a bipartisan group of House and Senate lawmakers introduced a bill that would end the program, codify an intelligence community decision to stop location-tracking surveillance activities, and change the process for obtaining court approval for surveillance, while proposing additional transparency measures.

To pass a bill where everybody says the thing doesn't work and we're just going to write into law what they're already doing and then call it a day, I think, would be very unfortunate because there's a lot more to do, Wyden said.

But additional changes appear to be a non-starter for Burr, who advised Wyden and others to introduce legislation if they want to see them enacted.

Elizabeth Goitein, a privacy advocate and co-director of the Liberty & National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, said offing the program should be the bare minimum lawmakers try to achieve.

When you have a surveillance program that has collected more than a billion records of Americans some of them without legal authorization, and all of them without any significant benefit its a no-brainer that the program should be terminated, she said.

The House aide said the expectation is for legislation to be introduced and voted on, at least by the Judiciary Committee, before going to the full chamber before the March 15 deadline. An overwhelmingly bipartisan House vote could send a message to the Senate to get on board with its bill.

Burr suggested that any extension would have to be hitched to another must-pass bill something in short supply this time of year. Such a move would prevent the legislation from being jammed on the floor by privacy hawks like Wyden and Republican Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Mike Lee (Utah).

Burr didnt rule out another short-term extension, either.

Im not going to rule out that we may have an effort by leadership to extend the authorization another 90 days or 60 days or something, Burr said.

We still have to do it. This is a must do.

See the article here:
Powerful lawmakers join effort to kill surveillance program protected by Trump administration - POLITICO

Putting AI to its broadest use in national defense will mean hardening it against attack.

Americas intelligence collectors are already using AI in ways big and small, to scan the news for dangerous developments, send alerts to ships about rapidly changing conditions, and speed up the NSAs regulatory compliance efforts. But before the IC can use AI to its full potential, it must be hardened against attack. The humans who use it analysts, policy-makers and leaders must better understand how advanced AI systems reach theirconclusions.

Dean Souleles is working to put AI into practice at different points across the U.S. intelligence community, in line with the ODNIs year-old strategy. The chief technology advisor to the principal deputy to the Director of National Intelligence wasnt allowed to discusseverything that hes doing, but he could talk about a fewexamples.

At the Intelligence Communitys Open Source Enterprise, AI is performing a role that used to belong to human readers and translators at CIAs Open Source Center: combing through news articles from around the world to monitor trends, geopolitical developments, and potential crises inreal-time.

Imagine that your job is to read every newspaper in the world, in every language; watch every television news show in every language around the world. You dont know whats important, but you need to keep up with all the trends and events, Souleles said. Thats the job of the Open Source Enterprise, and they are using technology tools and tradecraft to keep pace. They leverage partnerships with AI machine-learning industry leaders, and they deploy these cutting-edgetools.

Subscribe

Receive daily email updates:

Subscribe to the Defense One daily.

Be the first to receive updates.

AI is also helping the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, or NGA, notify sailors and mariners around the world about new threats, like pirates, or new navigation information that might change naval charts. Its a mix of open source and classified information. That demands that we leverage all available sources to accurately, and completely, and correctly give timely notice to mariners. We use techniques like natural language processing and other AI tools to reduce the timelines reporting, and increase the volume of data. And that allows us to leverage and increase the accuracy and completeness of our reporting, Souleles said.

The NSA has begun to use AI to better understand and see patterns in the vast amount of signals intelligence data it collects, screening for anomalies in web traffic patterns or other data that could portend an attack. Gen. Paul Nakasone, the head of NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, has said that he wants AI to find vulnerabilities in systems that the NSA may need to access for foreignintelligence.

NSA analysts and operators are also using AI to make sure they are following the many rules and guidelines that govern how the NSA collects intelligence on foreigntargets.

We do a lot of queries, NSA-speak for accessing signals intelligence data on an individual, Souleles said. Queries require audits to make sure that NSA is complying with thelaw.

But NSA technicians realized that audited queries can be used to train AI to get a jump on the considerable paperwork this entails, by learning to predict whether a query is reportable with pretty high accuracy, Souleles said. That could help the auditors and compliance officers do perform their oversight roles faster. He said the goal isnt to replace human oversight, just speed up and improve it. The goal for them is to get ahead of query review, to be able to make predictions about compliance, and the end result is greater privacy production foreveryone.

In the future, Souleles expects AI to ease analysts burdens, proving instantaneous machine translation and speech recognition that allows analysts to pour through different types of collected data, corroborate intelligence, and reach firmer conclusions, said Jason Matheny, a former director at the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity and founding director of the new Center for Security and Emerging Technology at GeorgetownUniversity.

One roadblock is the labor of collecting and labeling training data, said Souleles. While that same challenge exists in the commercial AI space, the secretive intelligence community cannot generally turn to, say, crowdsourcing platforms like Amazons Mechanical Turk.

The reason that image recognition works so well is that Stanford University and Princeton published Imagenet. Which is 14 million images of the regular things of the world taken from the internet, classified by people into about 200,000 categories of things, everyday things of the world; toasters, and TVs, and basketballs. Thats training data, says Souleles. We need to do the same thing with our classified collections and we cant, obviously, rely on the worlds Mechanical Turks to go classify our data inside our data source. So, weve got a big job in getting ourdata.

But the bigger problem is making AI models more secure, says Matheny. He says that todays flashy examples of AI, such as beating humans at complex games like Go and rapidly identifying faces, werent designed to ward off adversaries spending billions to try and defeat them. Current methods are brittle, says Methany. He described them as vulnerable to simple attacks like model inversion, where you reveal data a system was trained on, or trojans, data to mislead asystem,

In the commercial world, this isnt a big problem, or at least it isnt seen as one yet, because theresno adversary trying to spoof the system. But concern is rising, in 2017, researchers at MIT showed how easy it was to fool neural networks with 3D-printed objects by just slightly changing the texture. Its an issue that some in the intelligence community are beginning to talk about as well with the rise of new tools such as general adversarialnetworks.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has proposed an AI security program. Matheny said national labs should also play a leading role. To date, this is piecemeal work that an individual has done as part of a research project, hesaid.

Even a bigger problem is that humans generally dont understand the processes by which very complex algorithms like deep learning systems and neural nets reach the determinations that they do. That may be a small concern for the commercial world, where the most important thing is the ultimate output, not how it was reached, but national security leaders who must defend their decisions to lawmakers, say opaque functioning isnt good enough to make war or peacedecisions.

Most neural nets with a high rate of accuracy are not easily interpretable, says Matheny. There have been individual research programs at places like DARPA to make neural nets more explainable. But it remains a keychallenge.

New forms of advanced AI are slowly replacing some neural nets. Jana Eggers, CEO of Nara Logics, an AI company partnered with Raytheon, says she switched from traditional neural nets to genetic algorithms in some of her national security work. Unlike neural nets, where the system sets its own statistical weights, genetic algorithms evolve sequentially, just like organisms, and are thus more traceable. Look at a tool like Fiddler, a web debugging proxy that helps users debug and analyze web traffic patterns, she said. Theyre doing sensitivity analysis with what I would consider neural nets to figure out the why, what is the machine seeing that didntnecessarily.

But Eggers notes that making neural nets transparent also takes a lot of computing power, For all the different laws that intelligence analysts have to follow, the laws of physics present their own challenges aswell.

Read this article:
Spies Like AI: The Future of Artificial Intelligence for the US Intelligence Community - Defense One

Share

Share

Share

Email

JACKSON-A report in the Lakewood Scoop on Thursday said National Security Advisor John Bolton was heading to New Jersey to meet with religious leaders, community leaders and GOP officials to address a pattern of anti-Semitism against Orthodox Jews by the Jackson Township Republican Club.

Bolton, a former Trump aide was invited by Dr. Richard Roberts, President Trumps former Advisor on Jewish Relations who has pledged his support to combat what has become a culture of anti-Semitism within the Jackson Republican Club.

In recent years, Jackson Township has experienced a population surge of Orthodox Jews, after neighboring Lakewood Township is running out of space to build new homes. That influx of new residents and the fear of rapid overdevelopment has the community of Jackson on edge, but Roberts said some members of the local GOP club who run the town have gone too far.

Roberts blames party leaders Ocean County GOP Chairman Frank B. Holman, III and Mayor Michael Reina for the acceptance of intolerance in their party. Over the years the club has been plagued with resignations of members from township boards because of remarks made on social media. In one instance, a former Jackson GOP appointed zoning board member even threatened New Jersey State Senator Robert Singer and former Ocean County Chairman George Gilmore, both of whom are known to foster good relations with the Orthodox Jewish community in Ocean County.

Roberts claims Holman and Reina have failed to take proper actions to call out anti-Semitism within the party, especially in Jackson where the clubs two top officials, County Committee Chairwoman Clara Glory and Jackson GOP Club President Todd Porter have been under fire for insensitive and anti-Semitic posts made on Facebook against Orthodox Jews.

Jackson Township and elected officials are currently defending two federal civil rights lawsuits regarding actions and ordinances by the township government that claims those actions were based on anti-Semitism. Those defending the township claim they are merely fighting overdevelopment in their town brought by the need for more housing to accommodate the volume of Orthodox Jews moving into the town.

In one lawsuit, plaintiff Agudath Israel of America claims the township crossed the line when it drafted ordinances aimed to limit the construction of Synagogues and dormitories for religious schools. The lawsuit also claims former Jackson Township Councilman Robert Nixon crossed many lines after it was learned that he orchestrated a campaign against Orthodox Jews that involved checking on homes where prayers were being held and an increase in code enforcement activity in neighborhoods where Orthodox Jews were moving into.

Nixon resigned from the township council in November.

Last year, three Jackson GOP Club members were forced to resign from their positions on the township planning and zoning boards after they attended a meeting of a group called CUPON whose mission is to discuss strategy on how to stop residential overdevelopment in the town. At that meeting, comments were made that some deemed offensive and anti-Semitic, but because the three members sat on land use boards, they were forced to resign.

John Burrows, a former zoning board member and Jackson GOP club member John Burrows who ruled against an application for an all-girls religious high school later posted a scathing message on Facebook against Senator Robert Singer on September 10th, 2017, a day known as Suicide Awareness Day.

I implore senator Singer to step up and commit suicide, Burrows posted on Facebook. He is nothing but the byproduct of a human body eating matzoh and gafelta [sic] fish.

After many years of watching senator Singers proposals and interests which are solely to support and advance the Lakewood medieval cult, on the backs of the surrounding communities, its time to come to an end, his tirade continued. He is so obviously bought, paid for, and in the pocket of the Lakewood cult.

Burrows statement opened the door for the school developer to file a lawsuit against Jackson for the denial, claiming it was based on anti-Semitism and not building code or zoning.

GOP Club President Todd Porter on Facebook offered to chase Jewish children and families out of township parks by blasting death metal music and Slayer. Porter later issued an apology for that comment.

Ocean County Republican Committee Chairwoman Clara Glory was also accused of making anti-Semitic posts on Facebook, including a comment referencing Jews as criminals.

After another resident posted, They are crooks and should be deported they serve no good interest to America. People better start waking up before its too late, another user posted, We should not stereotype, there are bad in every group.

Glory, who also sits on the township Municipal Utilities Authority and an executive of the Jackson Chamber of Commerce replied, NO STEREOTYPING HERE..FACTS ARE FACTSTHIS IS EXACTLY WHAT JACKSON RESIDENTS FEAR. AND YES IT IS ALREADY HAPPENING.

Glory has also been criticized for her ties to Rise Up Ocean County by Dr. Roberts. On multiple occasions, Glory shared posts and videos by the group, which has been declared a hate group by the Ocean County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Rise Up Ocean County, an anonymous group claims their page is dedicated to resisting overdevelopment, but nearly every post on the page is focused on Orthodox Jews in Jackson, Lakewood and New York. Posts frequently detail crimes and offenses committed by Orthodox Jews and comments regarding overdevelopment in Lakewood Township.

Barry Calogero, another Jackson GOP Club member and elected councilman in Jackson has also come under fire for anti-Semitism. Ken Bressi, another GOP councilman recently claimed in a legal deposition that he felt Calogero and Reina were anti-Semitic. Calogero also happens to be a Trump appointee, serving as Executive Director of the NJ Farm Services branch of the USDA.

Lakewood Township is home to the worlds largest concentration of Orthodox Jews outside of Israel and home to Americas largest Jewish Yeshiva, Beth Medrash Govoha. Lakewood has become a concern by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the New Jersey State Police and other local law enforcement agencies after brutal attacks on Orthodox Jews in Jersey City and Monsey, New York. It has long been identified as a potential target of terrorism by DHS.

The Jackson Township GOP, which has drawn the attention of Roberts and Bolton has recently been condemned by National GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and NJ GOP Chairman Doug Steinhardt who both said there is no place for hate or anti-Semitism within the Republican Party. Roberts also criticized County GOP Chairman Holman for turning a blind eye to comments made by Glory. Holman, who is also a Jackson native has been protective of Glory. The boast frequently of their longtime relationship that dates back to their childhood.

Anti-Semitism was the topic of this weeks meeting of the Jackson Republican Club after several Orthodox Jews joined the club and claimed that a club member asked for their names and wrote them on a sheet of paper. A discussion about anti-Semitism became somewhat heated when club officials reportedly asked those new Jewish club members if they thought the club was anti-Semitic.

The Orthodox Jewish growth issue isnt contained to Jackson. In neighboring Toms River, in 2016, former Mayor Thomas Kelaher said the influx of Jewish residents was an invasion. Kelaher has since been replaced as Mayor by Maurice Mo Hill who has strong ties to the Orthodox Jewish community. Hill is a native of Lakewood and had the full support of the Jewish community during his 2019 election and tensions in Toms River have since eased.

See the article here:
Former NSA Security Advisor John Bolton Heading to NJ to Address Anti-Semitism by Republicans in Jackson Township - Shore News Magazine