Archive for the ‘NSA’ Category

Trump nemesis Rosie O’Donnell donates $1000 to NSA leak suspect – Atlanta Journal Constitution

A Trump basher in serious hot water is getting help from the presidents arch-nemesis, Rosie ODonnell.

The TV comedian has donated $1,000 to a GoFundMe campaign for Reality Leigh Winner, the 25-year-old federal contractor charged with leaking classified documents to an online media outlet.

Brave young patriot, ODonnell tweeted Wedesday, with a link to Winners GoFundMe page.

ODonnell has been feuding with Trump for more than a decade. She called him a snake-oil salesman on The View, and over the years hes called her a loser, crude, fat and dumb. Confronted with his belittling comments about women during a presidential debate, Trump interrupted, Only Rosie ODonnell.

Winner is the first person to be prosecuted for leaking under a president who has been vowing a crackdown on leaks for months.On her social media feeds, Winner didnt hide her disdain for Trump, calling him an orange fascist and Tangerine in Chief. Trump supporters have assailed her online, calling her a traitor, calling for her execution and even mocking her parents.

Via Twitter, ODonnell confirmed for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution late Wednesday that she made the $1,000 donation and said shes willing to do more. I would love to help her and her family, she said. I would love to talk to the mother and offer any help.

The GoFundMe account has raised more than $14,000.

It wasset up Monday by Shirley Fink, of Fairfax, Va., to assist with loss of wages, counseling from this traumatic experience and to be able to recover from this as Reality & her family rebuilds their lives. Its also for possible expenses for travel for the family and anything they might need to help them through these troubled times.

Winner is being held in the Lincoln County jail, about 40 miles from Augusta, with a bond hearing scheduled Thursday. Before her arrest, shehad access to classified National Security Agency material as an employee of government contractor Pluribus International, working at Fort Gordon.

Shes accused of printing out and mailing a secret intelligence report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election toThe Intercept, an online publication focused on national security and surveillance.

The rest is here:
Trump nemesis Rosie O'Donnell donates $1000 to NSA leak suspect - Atlanta Journal Constitution

50 Years Ago: NSA’s Deadliest Day – Observer

June 8, 1967 was the worst day in the history of the National Security Agency. On that date, Israeli airplanes and torpedo boats mauled and nearly sank an American spy ship in international waters, killing or maiming most of its crew. This tragedy appears as a footnote to Israelis, an unpleasant sideshow of their victorious Six Day War, while official Washington preferred the embarrassing episode be forgotten. But NSA has never let the Liberty and her ill-fated crew disappear from memory altogether.

The USS Liberty was owned and operated by the U.S. Navy, which euphemistically referred to her as one of its Technical Research Ships, but she really worked for NSA. A converted World War Two freighter, the Liberty was barely a warship, possessing minimal armament for self-defense, and her mission was very hush-hush. She sailed the world collecting signals intelligence on behalf of her bosses at Fort Meade, Maryland. Her hull contained a large top-secret room where sailors of the Naval Security Group, NSAs Navy component, intercepted and translated foreign communications.

In the mid-1960s, the Liberty sailed from crisis to crisis, wherever NSA needed her on station to collect SIGINT, and the beginning of June 1967 found her off the coast of west Africa. However, the rapidly deteriorating situation in the Middle East required her dispatch to the eastern Mediterranean, where war was about to break out again between Israel and her Arab neighbors.

On the fateful morning of June 8, the Liberty was sailing almost 30 miles north of the Sinai Peninsula, a war zone. By this point, the Six Day Wars fourth day, Israel was well on its way to defeating the combined forces of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, an epic victory that changed the map of the Middle East. The Liberty was in position to monitor possible Soviet movements, since there was concern in Washington that Moscow might come to the aid of its humiliated Egyptian client. The Cold War was still very real and as a result most of the Naval Security Group linguists aboard were specialists in Russian and Arabicnot Hebrew.

A half-century on, considerable debate persists about what really happened to the Liberty on June 8, but the essential facts not in dispute are these. Throughout the morning, several Israeli warplanes individually approached the U.S. Navy vessel, in some cases circling above the Liberty, in an apparent reconnaissance effort. Just before 2 p.m., two Israeli Air Force Mirage fighter jets raked Libertys decks with cannon fire. They were soon joined by three Israeli Mystre attack jets which executed multiple attack runs on the American ship, offering cannon blasts, rocket fire, and even napalm. The jets made repeated low-level attacks on the nearly defenseless Liberty for about 20 minutes. By the time they ceased, Libertys radars and communications gear were destroyed, nine Americans were dead or dying, and dozens more were wounded.

Shortly before 2:30 p.m., three Israeli Navy torpedo boats approached the Liberty, which was burning and littered with maimed sailors. They soon made an attack run on the wounded vessel, launching several torpedoes, only one of which found its target. That hit, however, landed right in the NSA-run top-secret SIGINT facility, incinerating it and killing 25 Americans. The torpedo boats then approached to rake the foundering ship with cannon and machine gun fire, culling sailors trying to save their vessel and wounded shipmates.

After that, the Israelis backed off, leaving the Liberty to sink. That she did not go under, despite a torpedo hit that nearly broke her hull in two, leaving a hole almost 40 feet across, can be attributed to the heroism of her crew and the leadership of her skipper, Commander William McGonagle, who led damage control efforts despite his own serious wounds. For his remarkable courage under fire, McGonagle would receive the Medal of Honor, the nations highest valor decoration, while other Liberty sailors were awarded other high decorations, including two Navy Crosses (both posthumously) and 11 Silver Stars (three posthumously).

The U.S. Navys powerful Sixth Fleet, which had considerable presence in the Mediterranean, was slow to come to the Libertys aid, despite her repeated distress calls. The first warship to reach the crippled ship was a Soviet destroyer, which reached the scene before any American vessels did. The Liberty limped to Malta and was taken out of service, too badly damaged to be repaired. She was officially removed from the fleet in 1970 and scrapped three years later.

From the outset, Israel insisted the incident was all a mistake, a tragic case of the fog of war. Israeli defense officials insisted they had confused the Liberty with an Egyptian vessel half her size. In Washington, the administration of President Lyndon B. Johnson was eager to accept Israels apology and offer to compensate the families of the dead. The White House didnt want a public fuss with an ally, much less one which had many friends and donors in Johnsons own Democratic Party. Neither was the navy eager to showcase its failure, above all Sixth Fleets fateful refusal to give the exposed Liberty a warship escort, as McGonagle had requested. Official Washington therefore did its best to pretend the whole regrettable incident had never transpired.

In a typical case, McGonagle received his Medal of Honor not from the president in a White House ceremony, as was the norm, but from the Navy secretary in a nondescript room at the Washington Navy Yard. Liberty survivors were sworn to secrecy, with threats of grave repercussions if they spoke to the media or the public about what transpired on June 8, 1967. Many grew resentful at their treatment, particularly after so many Liberty sailors had been killed or injured. In all, 34 men died and 171 were wounded, many of them maimed for life, 205 Purple Hearts in alla staggering percentage of the Libertys crew.

Time moved on and the Liberty issue became polemical as major facets of the case remained unresolved. Nobody in Washington who desired a political future wanted to discuss the events of June 8, 1967 so the issue faded from the newspapers. Some survivors sensed a cover-up. While their physical wounds eventually healed, for many of the men who served on the Liberty, their mental anguish never abated.

One survivor, Jim Ennes, who had been the Libertys Officer of the Day on that terrible day, became an activist and published a book in 1980 which was sharply critical of both Israel and the U.S. Navy, arguing that the Israeli attack had been intentionala fact which the American government had conspired to obscure.

A counterpoint came in 2002 with the publication of a book on the case by Jay Cristol, a Federal judge and Navy Reserve lawyer. Cristol argued that the attack on the Liberty was precisely the mistake Israel had always said it was. However, his book was more a detailed legal brief for the Israeli version of the case than a balanced effort to resolve unanswered questions.

The best book on the Liberty incident was published in 2009 and was authored by James Scott, an award-winning journalist and the son of a Liberty survivor. Years of meticulous research went into the book, and Scott uncovered ample new evidence which raises awkward questions for both Tel Aviv and Washington. In the end, Scott demonstrates that there was indeed a high-level cover-up about the events of June 8, 1967, and the public has never been told the full truth of the Liberty incident.

For its part, NSA has never believed the official version of what happened to its doomed spy ship. Lieutenant General Marshall Carter, the agencys director in 1967, from the outset was contemptuous of Israels claims of a mere accident. Oliver Kirby, who was NSAs deputy director for operations, i.e. its SIGINT boss, when the Liberty was attacked, decades later stated that NSA possessed intercepts which left no doubt that Israeli pilots who attacked the vessel knew it was American. In 2003, Kirby professed his absolute certainty that Israel knew the Liberty was a U.S. Navy ship, based on SIGINT intercepts he had seen. Several other top Intelligence Community officials over the years have said similar things. For his part, Richard Helms, who was the CIAs director at the time of the Liberty incident, stated in 2002 about the Israeli attack: It was no accident.

In 2007, NSA released a substantial trove of declassified materials on the Liberty incident, including reports, assessments, studies, and some SIGINT. None of those reports demonstrate that Israeli pilots and sailors knew the vessel they were attacking was American. Clearly the SIGINT Kirby referencedwhich many other IC insiders over the years claim to have seen, including people at the agency whom I knewhas not been released by NSA to date.

Therefore, the Liberty case will continue to linger with many basic questions about what happened on June 8, 1967and whyunanswered. Survivors are now old men, and with their passing such questions may become unanswerable. Not long before his death in 1999, retired Captain McGonagle broke his three decades of silence on the tragedy. Speaking at a memorial at Arlington Cemetery, where several of the Libertys dead are interred, McGonagle stated:

For many years, I had wanted to believe that the attack on the Liberty was pure error. It appears to me that it was not a pure case of mistaken identity. I think its about time that the state of Israel and the United States government provide the crew members of the Liberty and the rest of the American people the facts of what happened and why it came about that the Liberty was attacked.

Two decades have now passed since Captain McGonagle made his plea, wearing his navy dress whites with the Medal of Honor around his neck, and we are no closer to knowing the full truth of this troubling case.

NSA remembers the brave men of the USS Liberty and their sacrifice, even if the American public has long forgotten. The National Cryptologic Museum, which is adjacent to the agencys sprawling headquarters complex, possesses a display about the ship and its crew, including Captain McGonagles Medal of Honor, as well as the large U.S. flag which the Liberty flew during the attack, tattered by Israeli fire.

Nearby is a full-size replica of NSAs memorial wall the original is a few hundred yards away inside agency headquarters, inaccessible to the public which lists the names of 176 Americans who gave their lives on duty for NSA. The biggest group comes from the USS Liberty, 34 names in all 31 sailors, two Marines, and one NSA civilian. Above all their names is inscribed a memorable description of their work and their fate:

THEY SERVED IN SILENCE

John Schindler is a security expert and former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer. A specialist in espionage and terrorism, hes also been a Navy officer and a War College professor. Hes published four books and is on Twitter at @20committee.

Follow this link:
50 Years Ago: NSA's Deadliest Day - Observer

Accused NSA leaker may have worked at secretive listening post – New York Post

The 25-year-old contractor accused of leaking classified NSA documents may have used her linguistics skills to gain access to a government listening post that collects intelligence signals from the Middle East and Europe, according to a report Tuesday.

Reality Winner who allegedly leaked a classified intelligence report containing Top Secret Level defense info likely worked at the Sweet Tea outpost, a 604,000-square-foot NSA post in Fort Gordon, Ga., according to The Daily Beast.

The sprawling facility, which opened 2012, can house up to 4,000 specialists working to translate and analyze intercepted communications from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, according to The Daily Beast.

Winner speaks at least four languages and served as a linguistics specialist for in the Air Force. She speaks Farsi, Pashto, and Dari, her mother told The Guardian.

What she did is very common among former military personnel, especially people who, like her, were trained in the military with linguistic skill sets, Bradley Moss, an attorney specializing in national security told The Daily Beast. She was already vetted and cleared by the Air Force for at least top secret clearance, if not top secret clearance with sensitive compartmented information access eligibility. It transfers over to her contract wherever she goes, in this case apparently the NSA.

Winners rsum notes she worked at the Georgia Cryptologic Center as a contractor for Pluribus International Corporation, the news site reported. An Army spokesperson for Fort Gordon claimed Winner was contractor who was not in Fort Gordon.

An NSA spokesperson wouldnt confirm whether Winner had worked at Sweet Tea. Winners employer, Pluribus International, did not return a request for comment.

Inside, behind barbed-wire fences, heavily armed guards, and cipher-locked doors, earphone-clad men and women secretly listen in as al-Qaeda members chat on cell phones along the Afghan border, and to insurgents planning attacks in Iraq, journalist James Bamford wrote about the site in 2008.

Original post:
Accused NSA leaker may have worked at secretive listening post - New York Post

The latest NSA leak is a reminder that your bosses can see your every move – Washington Post

The Washington Post's Devlin Barrett explains how an arrest of a government contractor was made so quickly in the NSA document leak to The Intercept. (Whitney Leaming/The Washington Post)

It took just days forauthorities to arrest and charge a federal contractorwithleaking classified intelligence to the media. Court documents explain in detail how the 25-year-old woman suspected in the leak,Reality Leigh Winner, allegedly printed off a copy of a National Security Agency report on Russian tampering in the U.S. elections and mailed it to a news outlet.

What helped federal authorities link Winner to the leak were unrelated personal emails she had sent to the Intercept news site weeks before, which surfaced when investigators searched her computer. But how were officials able to gain access to her personal accounts? The answer, according to some former NSA analysts, is that the agency routinely monitors many of its employees' computer activity.

The case offers a reminder that virtually every American worker in today's economy can be tracked and reported and you don't even have to be the NSA to pull it off.

[What we know about Reality Winner, the contractor accused of leaking an NSA document]

She emailed the Intercept using her work computer, said Michelle Richardson, a privacy expert at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington think tank. They can monitor the traffic on their systems, look at thesix people who printed the doc, and see that she was the one who had contact.

The NSA didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Employee monitoring issoextensive in American society that it may be difficult for workers to know just how far they might have to go to avoid it.Itis a $200 million-a-year industry, according toa study last year by 451 Research, a technology research firm, and is estimated to be worth $500 million by 2020.

[How Congress dismantled federal Internet privacy rules]

Monitoringtechniques have become quite sophisticated, enabling employers to track notonly what websitestheir workers visit, but also when they plug in USB storage devices, move or copy files, and what programs theyrun, privacyexperts say. One companyevenallows bosses to play back videos of what took place on a user's screen and can collect communications activity both on traditional email programs as well as popular webmail services.

Employee monitoringrecently came tolight in ahigh-profile lawsuit involving Uber and Waymo, the self-driving car company owned by Google's parent firm, Alphabet. In accusing former Waymo employee Anthony Levandowski of stealing trade secrets and taking them to Uber, Waymo said it was able to determine that Levandowski installed inappropriate software on his company-issued laptop, then downloaded thousands of confidential files before putting them on an external storage device he connected to the machine.

[Supreme Court to decide if a warrant is needed to track a suspect through cellphone records]

Despite Levandowski's attempt to then erase forensic fingerprints by reformatting the laptop's hard drive, Waymo said, the company was nonetheless able to gather the requisite evidence likely using monitoring technology, analysts said.

Even workers who don't report to an office every day are subject to monitoring. The proliferation of GPS devices in smartphones now means that even truck drivers can be tracked. Arecent report from the technology research firm Aberdeen Group found that nearly two-thirds of companies with employees who work in the field were tracking their employees with GPS.

The earliest forms of modern employee monitoring date to the early 1910s, when companies would use mechanical counters to track how quickly workers were typing on their typewriters, according to Jitendra Mishra and Suzanne M. Crampton, who co-wrote a study in 1998 on the topic.Theynotedthatwhat has changed in more recent years is the method of supervision and the extent of information gathering capabilities available. That includes phone and video surveillance, keystroke logging and other forms of monitoring.

[Booz Allen Hamilton employee left sensitive passwords unprotected online]

Since then, numerous court cases have givenemployers a remarkable amount of freedom towatch their workers. In 2010, the Supreme Court heard a case involving two police officers who had been punished at work after it was discovered that they had used their mobile devices to send personal text messages. The officers argued that the police department's search of their devices was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, but the court unanimously ruled against them, saying it was a reasonable search and that the officers should have known that their work devices might be inspected.

Privacy advocates have been pushing for years to have Congress review various communications privacy laws in light of updates to technology. Many argue that the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act does not provide enough protections to consumers today because many emails, text messages and other content can be summoned by law enforcement with little more than a subpoena.

ECPA was first passed in 1986 before Congress could imagine the wealth of personal information that would be stored on third-party servers rather than private hard drives, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a technology advocacy group, has said.

Congresstook a step toward updating the country's digital privacy laws in February, when the Housevoted to approve the Email Privacy Act. While the bill has largely stalled, it proposes requiring a warrant for searching emails that have been sitting in an account for more than 180 days.

Still, given the other case law surrounding employee surveillance, it's important to note that changes to the ECPA mightnot putan end to routine employer monitoring. Soyou might still want to be careful with what you do on your devices at work.

Read the original:
The latest NSA leak is a reminder that your bosses can see your every move - Washington Post

Senator blasts NSA chief: ‘What you feel isn’t relevant, admiral’ – The Hill

Sen. Angus KingAngus KingGOP chairman admonishes intel chiefs Senator blasts NSA chief: What you feel isnt relevant, admiral The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (I-Maine) snapped at the head of the National Security Agency (NSA) in a contentious moment of a Senate hearing on Wednesday that delved into questions over Russias meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

King, known as one of the Senates more genial members, reached a breaking point more than an hour into the hearing after Michael Rogers repeatedly refused to answer questions about whether President Trump tried to interfere in the FBIs investigation into Russias actions and possible collusion with his campaign.

Rogers declined to answer questions about reports of his interactions with Trump throughout the morning, telling a visibly frustrated King that he didnt feel it was appropriate.

What you feel isnt relevant, admiral, King said back at the NSA chief.

Later, when Rogers said he did not mean for his answer to King's question to sound confrontational, King said he did mean to sound confrontational.

Why are you not answering these questions? Is there an invocation of executive privilege? King demanded. Im not satisfied with, I do not believe its appropriate or I do not believe I should answer.

Im not sure I have a legal basis, Coats said at one point, adding that he would provide as much information as he was able behind closed doors.

Rogers indicated that while he and Coats have had conversations with the White House about a potential claim of executive privilege, he said that they had not gotten a definitive answer.

McCabe and Rosenstein both cited the ongoing federal investigation, led by special counsel Robert Mueller, arguing that it is longstanding Justice Department procedure not to discuss anything that might be under active investigation.

I dont understand why the special counsels lane takes precedence over the lane of the United States Congress, King said.

At issue was whether any of the officials had any evidence that Trump may have inappropriately attempted to curtail the FBI's investigation.

The Washington Post reported on Tuesday that Trump had asked Coats to intervene with then-FBI Director James Comey to limit the probe.

Both Coats and Rogers deniedfeeling pressured by Trump to intervene in the handling of intelligence in any inappropriate way but refused to answer specific questions about their interactions with the president.

Im willing to come before the committee and tell you what I know and dont know, Coats said. What Im not willing to do is share information I think ought to be protected in an opening hearing.

In a clear sign of the level of frustration in the room, Democrats repeatedly interrupted and talked over officials claims that they couldnt respond to certain lines of questioning. The argumentative exchanges on more than one occasion prompted Sen. John McCainJohn McCainSenator blasts NSA chief: What you feel isnt relevant, admiral Senate trying to insert Russia sanctions into popular Iran bill OPINION: Why President Trump should fear John McCain MORE (R-Ariz.) to grab his microphone and request that witnesses be allowed to answer.

In a previous and equally tense moment, Sen. Martin HeinrichMartin HeinrichSenator blasts NSA chief: What you feel isnt relevant, admiral Unemployment rate hits 16-year low as just 138K jobs added Intel chief has not talked with Trump about reported disclosure of classified info MORE (D-N.M.) cut off Rosenstein by saying, At this point you filibuster better than most of my colleagues.

Chairman Richard BurrRichard BurrWarren encourages Kamala Harris after shes scolded in hearing GOP senator threatens to subpoena Comey GOP chairman admonishes intel chiefs MORE (R-N.C.), clearly aggravated, eventually intervened. The committee is on notice, he snapped, pointing a finger and demanding that members provide the witnesses the courtesy to respond.

Comey is set to testify before the Senate Intelligence panel on Thursday in what may be the most highly anticipated congressional hearing since the Senate Judiciary Committee heard from Anita Hill, who had accused then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment.

View post:
Senator blasts NSA chief: 'What you feel isn't relevant, admiral' - The Hill