Mediaboss Marketing

Atlantic magazine writer Steve Clemons said during a Saturday panel on MSNBCs The Point with Ari Melber that National Security Administration (NSA) Director Michael Rogers may have a bomb to drop on the Trump administration.

Rogers will testify Wednesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is currently investigating whether President Donald Trumps campaign colluded with Russian officials to sway the results of the 2016 election.

We now know for certain that Vladimir Putin waged political warfare against Americas democracy with the election last year, said Mother Jones magazines David Corn. While thats going on, Donald Trump is saying, No, its not happening. Its like a guy in front of a bank robbery saying, Nothing is going on here. He was helping.

He made it easier for Putin to pull this off, Corn said. That in itself should be a big scandal.

While a lot of people have focused on James Comey and thats obviously a huge anchor in this, Clemons said at the end of the segment, watch the Senate Intelligence Committee hearings on Wednesday. National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers may have a bomb to drop in this, as well as Dan Coates. I have been tipped off that Mike Rogers has a story to tell as well that goes right along the lines that our friend David Corn has shared.

Watch the video, embedded below:

The rest is here:
NSA Director Mike Rogers poised to 'drop a bomb' on Trump admin ... - Raw Story

NEW YORK (NBC) Megyn Kelly makes her NBC debut with the first episode of her new show, "Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly" at 6 p.m. on KY3.

In her first episode, she sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and asks him about the nature of his relationship with former U.S. National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn.

Megyn Kelly: He came over here for a dinner-- a photo of which has been widely circulated in the American media. What was the nature of your relationship with him?

Vladimir Putin: You and I, you and I personally, have a much closer relationship than I had with Mr. Flynn. You and I met yesterday evening. You and I have been working together all day today. And now we're meeting again. When I came to the event for our company, Russia Today, and sat down at the table, next to me there was a gentleman sitting on one side.

I made my speech. Then we talked about some other stuff. And I got up and left. And then afterwards I was told, You know there was an American gentleman he was involved in some things. He used to be in the security services. That's it. I didn't even really talk to him. I just greeted him and sat down next to him. Later I said good bye, got up and left. That's the extent of my acquaintance with Mr. Flynn.

See the original post:
Putin denies relationship with former NSA Michael Kelly - KY3

"I have reviewed the declaration of Michael V. Hayden dated March 8, 2017," Drake's statement said. "As a result of personal knowledge I gained as a long-time contractor and then senior executive (1989-2008) of the NSA, I know the statements made by Hayden in that declaration are false or, if not literally false, substantially misleading."

Drake's statement was provided to the U.S. Department of Justice this week, as part of discovery, by attorney Rocky Anderson the Salt Lake City mayor at the time of the 2002 Olympics who represents plaintiffs Mary Josephine Valdez, Howard Stephenson, Deeda Seed, Will Bagley and Thomas Nelson Huckin.

In January, Judge Robert Shelby rejected an attempt by the Department of Justice to dismiss the case.

The NSA has the capability to seize and store electronic communications passing through U.S. intercept centers, according to a statement from Drake.

After Sept. 11, 2001, "the NSA's new approach was that the president had the authority to override the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Bill of Rights, and the NSA worked under the authority of the president," Drake said. "The new mantra to intercepting intelligence was 'just get it' regardless of the law."

Additional information on NSA's intelligence gathering came to light in 2013 when Edward Snowden revealed to Glenn Greenwald of the Guardian, the scope of U.S. and British global surveillance programs.

One of the documents Snowden purloined spoke to the 2002 operation, where the NSA sought detailed records without warrants from telecom communications systems in Utah, including Qwest Communications.

The document, labeled "Top Secret," has several entries, including this one: "In early 2002, NSA personnel met with senior vice president of government systems and other employees from Company E [later identified as Qwest]. Under authority of the President's Surveillance Program (PSP), NSA asked Company E to provide call records in support of security for the Olympics in Salt Lake City... On 19 February 2002, Company E submitted a written proposal that discussed methods it could use to regularly replicate call record information stored in a Company E facility and potentially froward the same information to NSA ... "

In 2011 the NSA completed the $1.2 billion digital storage faci`lity called the Utah Data Center in Bluffdale.

In a 2012 lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, two former highly-placed NSA employees said the agency was not filtering personal electronic data but was storing everything it collected.

"The capacity of NSA's infrastructure far exceeds the capacity necessary for the storage of discreet, targeted communications," said William Binney. "The capacity of NSA's infrastructure is consistent, as a mathematical matter, with seizing both the routing information and the contents of all communications."

In the same case, J. Kirk Wiebe, who worked as a senior analyst at the NSA from 1975 to 2001, concurred with Binney and Drake.

"I agree with Mr. Drake's assessment that everything changed at the NSA after the attacks of September 11. The prior approach focused on complying with the Foreign Intelligence Act (FISA)," he stated. "The post-September 11 approach was that NSA could circumvent federal statutes and the Constitution as long as there was some visceral connection to looking for terrorists."

By contrast, in the Utah case, current NSA Director of Operations Wayne Murphy, like Hayden, rejected allegations of an NSA "blanket" surveillance program during the 2002 Winter Olympics. He noted, however, that NSA collection of communications did and does continue to exist but is "targeted at one-end foreign communications where a communicant was reasonably believed to be a member or agent of Al-Qaeda or another international terrorist organization."

Anderson called the NSA's surveillance programs "Orwellian."

Read the original post:
NSA conducted blanket surveillance of Salt Lakers during 2002 ... - Salt Lake Tribune

Russian President Vladimir Putinbelieves Edward Snowdens decisionto leaktop-secret information from the National Security Agency was wrong.

Yet speaking in an interview with Oliver Stone for a series called The Putin Interviews,which airs onShowtime on June 12, the Russian president also defended Snowden, a former NSA contractor who is currently living in exile in Moscow.

Related: Putin slams Trump-Russia probe

Subscribe to Newsweek from $1 per week

As an ex-KGB agent, you must have hated what Snowden did with every fiber of your being? Stone asks Putin through a translator in a clip from the show.

"Snowden is not a traitor," Putin replies. "He didnt betray the interest of his country. Nor did he transfer any information to any other country which would have been pernicious to his own country or to his own people.

Still, the Russian president said he thought Snowden had other options.

I think he shouldnt have done it," Putin said.

If he didnt like anything at his work, he should have simply resigned. But he went further. Thats his right. But since you are asking me whether it's right or wrong, I think its wrong.

The four-part special from Stone will air a week after Putin's much publicized interview withNBC's Megyn Kelly and comes at a time when allegations continue to swirl that Russian intelligence meddled in the 2016 presidential election and possibly colluded with now-President Donald Trump.

Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke to Oliver Stone for series called "The Putin Interviews." Dmitri Lovetsky/Pool/Reuters

During the interview with Stone, Putin also defended the actions of his own intelligence services.

"Our intelligence services always conform to the law," the Russian president said. "Thats the first thing. And secondly, trying to spy on your allies if you really consider them allies and not vassals is just indecent. Because it undermines trust. And it means that in the end it deals damage to your own national security."

Read more from the original source:
Vladimir Putin on Edward Snowden's NSA Leak: He Shouldn't Have Done It - Newsweek

National Security Agency analysts under the Obama administration improperly searched Americans' information, but the searches were conducted largely out of error, according to a review of publicly available intelligence documents reported on by Circa last week.

The website reported that Obama's NSA violated privacy protections by searching a subset of intelligence for Americans' information. The story draws in part from a partially declassified April 2017 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinion, which says that the NSA repeatedly and inappropriately queried, or searched, "U.S. person identifiers" within a swath of data. The data was collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, meaning that it targeted a foreigner, on foreign soil, for a foreign intelligence purpose.

The NSA at the time was not allowed to search a chunk of intelligence, known as "upstream," using U.S. person identifiers (like an American's email address)but it did, and "with much greater frequency than had previously been disclosed" to the FISC. Upstream data is obtained from "providers that control the telecommunications "backbone" over which telephone and Internet communications transit," according to an independent government oversight agency.

Of this, Circa wrote:

The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.

Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person's identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.

Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA's own internal watchdog found that not to be true.

This sounds nefarious, especially against the backdrop of a months-long controversy over unmasking and leaks. But as Circa hints some paragraphs later, the incidents, which were self-reported by the NSA to Congress and the FISC, were in part the result of a system design quirk.

"The system automatically includes in a search all authorities an analyst's credentials permit the analyst to access," Adam Klein, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told THE WEEKLY STANDARD. "That meant that analysts with access to upstream data had to opt out of querying upstream when setting their search criteria. That system design apparently resulted in non-compliant queries."

A January notice to the FISC also said that "human error was the primary factor" in a portion of these improper queries. The NSA in an announcement also claimed that the incidents were "not willful." And as Klein told TWS, "There have been no reported incidents of intentional misuse of Section 702 by the agencies responsible for implementing it."

The NSA inspector general report read:

For the queries into FAA 702 upstream data, SV concluded that analysts had not removed the FAA 702 upstream authority from their search criteria (that automatically defaulted on the basis of their credentials) or had not included the appropriate . . . limiters to prevent FAA 702 upstream data from being queried.

The NSA told the FISC about the incidents as the court conducted its annual review for 702 certifications. The non-compliance triggered a broader NSA review, and ultimately resulted in the agency declaring the end of "about" collectionor the gathering of communications that mention a target. "About" collection often scooped up entirely domestic communications, drawing the ire of civil liberties advocates. The NSA also announced that it would purge much of its upstream data, and the FISC gave the go-ahead for analysts to query upstream using U.S. person identifiers, now that "about" has ended.

The court's late March certification reflected that change. But the court was not pleased with the non-compliance. The FISC in October described it as "a very serious Fourth Amendment issue" and attributed the agency's delayed disclosure to "an institutional 'lack of candor.'"

Still, the incidentincluding the NSA's self-reporting and public announcementsexemplifies the extent of 702 oversight, Klein said.

"The program is subject to extensive oversight, including judicial supervision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The recent end of "about" collection in response to FISC oversight shows that it has real teeth," he said.

If you have questions about this fact check, or would like to submit a request for another fact check, email Jenna Lifhits at jlifhits@weeklystandard.com or The Weekly Standard at factcheck@weeklystandard.com.

More:
Fact Check: Why did the NSA breach privacy protections? - The Weekly Standard