Archive for the ‘NSA’ Category

FBI searched NSA spying records on Americans — without a court order: report – Raw Story

On Monday, The Daily Beast reported that the FBI searched through huge collections of National Security Agency-gathered foreign communications for information on domestic terrorists and gangs in the United States without any sort of authorization by a court.

"Even though the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court warned the FBI in 2018 that its warrant-free queries, known as backdoor searches, were constitutionally alarming, the bureau still conducted queries relevant to criminal investigations about, among other things 'domestic terrorism involving racially motivated violent extremists,'" reported Spencer Ackerman. "The court's Judge James E. Boasberg found what he referred to as 'apparent widespread violations of the querying standard.'"

In addition to domestic terrorism, the report said, "The FISA Court recounts government acknowledgement that at least 40 FBI searches through the NSA's warrantlessly-collected data involved 'health care fraud, transnational organized crime, violent gangs' and 'public corruption and bribery.' On at least one occasion, around May 2020, an FBI analyst looked through the foreign NSA troves 'to vet [a] potential source in [a] predicated criminal investigation relating to public corruption.' Seven FBI field offices were implicated in 'these and a number of similar violations,' according to a November 18, 2020 FISA Court opinion declassified on Monday and signed by Boasberg."

The FBI maintains that none of these searches were actually "used in a civil or criminal proceeding" but had they been, these searches could have jeopardized suspects' right to a fair trial and given ammunition for appeal. Indeed, noted the report, "In an opinion released in 2019, the Court explicitly warned the FBI that its backdoor searches were dubious under the Fourth Amendment."

In recent years, the NSA has reduced the use of warrantless surveillance of some Americans as the programs to do so have become controversial.

You can read more here.

Go here to read the rest:
FBI searched NSA spying records on Americans -- without a court order: report - Raw Story

Impact Of COVID-19 On 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market 2021 Industry Challenges Business Overview And Forecast Research Study 2027 KSU |…

Report Covers the Detailed Pre and Post COVID-19 Impact Analysis on 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market

This report contains market size and forecasts of 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture in Global, including the following market information:, Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Revenue, 2016-2021, 2022-2027, ($ millions), Global top five companies in 2020 (%)

The global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture market was valued at xx million in 2020 and is projected to reach US$ xx million by 2027, at a CAGR of xx% during the forecast period., Research has surveyed the 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture companies, and industry experts on this industry, involving the revenue, demand, product type, recent developments and plans, industry trends, drivers, challenges, obstacles, and potential risks.

Download PDF Sample@ https://www.themarketinsights.com/request-sample/125119

Total Market by Segment:, Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market, By Type, 2016-2021, 2022-2027 ($ millions), Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Segment Percentages, By Type, 2020 (%), by Type of Infrastructure, Femtocell, Pico Cell, Micro Cell, Macro Cell, by Type of 5G NSA, LTE assisted, NR under EPC, NR assisted LTE under 5GC, LTE assisted, NR under 5GC, LTE assisted, 5GC connected

China 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market, By Application, 2016-2021, 2022-2027 ($ millions), China 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Segment Percentages, By Application, 2020 (%), Smart Home, Autonomous Driving, Smart Cities, Industrial IoT, Smart Farming

Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market, By Region and Country, 2016-2021, 2022-2027 ($ Millions), Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Segment Percentages, By Region and Country, 2020 (%), North America, US, Canada, Mexico, Europe, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, Nordic Countries, Benelux, Rest of Europe, Asia, China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, India, Rest of Asia, South America, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America, Middle East & Africa, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of Middle East & Africa,

Request Customization@ https://www.themarketinsights.com/request-customization/125119

Competitor Analysis, The report also provides analysis of leading market participants including:, Total 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Competitors Revenues in Global, by Players 2016-2021 (Estimated), ($ millions), Total 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Competitors Revenues Share in Global, by Players 2020 (%)

Further, the report presents profiles of competitors in the market, including the following:, Qualcomm, Intel, Avago, Skyworks, Ericsson, Samsung, NEC, Mediatek, Cisco, Marvell, Qorvo, Huawei, LG, NTT DoCoMo, SK Telecom, ZTE, Nokia,

Request Discount@ https://www.themarketinsights.com/check-discount/125119

Some Point of Table of Content:

Chapter One: Introduction to Research & Analysis Reports

Chapter Two: Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Overall Market Size

Chapter Three: Company Landscape

Chapter Four: Market Sights by Product

Chapter Five: Sights by Application

Chapter Six: Sights by Region

Chapter Seven: Players Profiles

Chapter Eight: Conclusion

Chapter Nine: Appendix

9.1 Note

9.2 Examples of Clients

9.3 Disclaimer

Access Complete TOC @ https://www.themarketinsights.com/report/5g-non-standalone-nsa-architecture-market-125119

List of Table and FigureTable 1. 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Opportunities & Trends in Global Market

Table 2. 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Drivers in Global Market

Table 3. 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market Restraints in Global Market

Table 4. Key Players of 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture in Global Market

Table 5. Top 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Players in Global Market, Ranking by Revenue (2019)

Table 6. Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue by Companies, (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 7. Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue Share by Companies, 2016-2021

Table 8. Global Companies 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Product Type

Table 9. List of Global Tier 1 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Companies, Revenue (US$, Mn) in 2020 and Market Share

Table 10. List of Global Tier 2 and Tier 3 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Companies, Revenue (US$, Mn) in 2020 and Market Share

Table 11. By Type Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2021 VS 2027

Table 12. By Type 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue in Global (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 13. By Type 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue in Global (US$, Mn), 2022-2027

Table 14. By Application Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2021 VS 2027

Table 15. By Application 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue in Global (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 16. By Application 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue in Global (US$, Mn), 2022-2027

Table 17. By Region Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2021 VS 2027

Table 18. By Region Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 19. By Region Global 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue (US$, Mn), 2022-2027

Table 20. By Country North America 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 21. By Country North America 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2022-2027

Table 22. By Country Europe 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2016-2021

Table 23. By Country Europe 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2022-2027

Table 24. By Region Asia 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Revenue, (US$, Mn), 2016-2021 continued

About us.The Market Insights is a sister company to SI Market research and The Market Insights is into reselling. The Market Insights is a company that is creating cutting edge, futuristic and informative reports in many different areas. Some of the most common areas where we generate reports are industry reports, country reports, company reports and everything in between. At The Market Insights, we give our clients the best reports that can be made in the market. Our reports are not only about market statistics, but they also contain a lot of information about new and niche company profiles. The companies that feature in our reports are pre-eminent. The database of the reports on market research is constantly updated by us. This database contains a broad variety of reports from the cardinal industries. Our clients have direct access online to our databases. This is done to ensure that the client is always provided with what they need. Based on these needs, we at The Market Insights also include insights from experts about the global industries, market trends as well as the products in the market. These resources that we prepare are also available on our database for our esteemed clients to use. It is our duty at The Market Insights to ensure that our clients find success in their endeavors and we do everything that we can to help make that possible.

Direct ContactJessica Joyal+91-9284395731 | +91 9175986728sales@themarketinsights.com

Read the rest here:
Impact Of COVID-19 On 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) Architecture Market 2021 Industry Challenges Business Overview And Forecast Research Study 2027 KSU |...

Registration for NSA’s Hot Topics on Science of Security (HoTSoS) Event – HSToday

Hot Topics on Science of Security (HoTSoS)is a research event centered on the Science of Security, which aims to address the fundamental problems of security in a principled manner.Registration is now open for the eighth annual HoTSoS event which will be held virtually, hosted by the National Security Agency on April 13-15, 2021. The HotSoS plenary presentations will take place on the Hopin virtual conference platform. Networking and poster sessions will be held on the Gather.town platform. Registered attendees will receive an email with instructions for accessing the platforms in the week prior to the event.Register hereRegistration deadline is 11 April.

HotSoSbrings together researchers from diverse disciplines to promote advancement of work related to the science of security. The 8th Symposium continues the series emphasis on cyber-security with a strong methodology and scientific rigor. This symposium solicits presentations of already published work in security and privacy, particularly that which examines the scientific foundations of trustworthy systems. In addition to these presentations, the symposium solicits work in progress papers for discussion, presentations of student research projects, and research posters. The program will also include invited talks and panels. The poster session will be highlighted by a poster competition.

Keynote presentations will be delivered by:

Special Session on Science of Security Hard Problems

The program this year will also include a special breakout discussion session centered on Science of Security Hard Problems.The SoS community influencers are revisiting the SoS Hard Problems and their definitions in preparation for a second decade of the National Security Agency (NSA) Science of Security and Privacy Program.

Read more at NSA

(Visited 70 times, 1 visits today)

The rest is here:
Registration for NSA's Hot Topics on Science of Security (HoTSoS) Event - HSToday

US NSA to host trilateral dialogue with Japan and South Korea on April 2 – Economic Times

US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan will hold a trilateral dialogue with his South Korean and Japanese counterparts on the issue of North Korea on Friday, the White House announced on Wednesday.

On April 2, Sullivan will welcome National Security Secretariat Secretary General Shigeru Kitamura of Japan and National Security Advisor Suh Hoon of the Republic of Korea for a trilateral dialogue at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, National Security Council Spokesperson Emily Horne said.

This meeting, which follows the visits of Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin to Japan and the Republic of Korea, provides an opportunity for the three nations to consult on a wide range of regional issues and foreign policy priorities, including maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula, addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, and combating climate change, she said.

This meeting with Japan and South Korea is the first National Security Advisor-level multilateral dialogue of the Biden Administration, reflecting the importance it places on broadening and deepening its cooperation on key issues and advancing the shared prosperity across a free and open Indo-Pacific, Horne said.

Go here to read the rest:
US NSA to host trilateral dialogue with Japan and South Korea on April 2 - Economic Times

The Cyberlaw Podcast: Can Editorial Middleware Cut the Power of the Big Platforms? – Lawfare

Our interview this week is with Francis Fukuyama, a fellow and teacher at Stanford and a renowned scholar and public intellectual for at least three decades. He is the coauthor of the Report of the Working Group on Platform Scale. Its insightful on the structural issues that have enhanced the power of platforms to suppress and shape public debate. It understands the temptation to address those issues through an antitrust lens as well as the reasons why antitrust will fail to address the threat that platform power poses to our democracy. As a solution, it proposes to force the platforms to divest their curatorial authority over what Americans (and the world) reads, creating a host of middleware suppliers who will curate consumers feeds in the way that consumers prefer. We explore the many objections to this approach, from first amendment purists to those, mainly on the left, who really like the idea of suppressing their opponents on the right. But it remains the one policy proposal that could attract support from left and right and also make a real difference.

In the news roundup, Dmitri Alperovich, Nick Weaver, and I have a spirited debate over the wisdom of Googles decision to expose and shut down a western intelligence agencys use of zero day exploits against terrorist targets. I argue that if a vulnerabilities equities process balancing security and intelligence is something we expect from NSA, it should also be expected of Google.

Nate Jones and Dmitri explore the slightly odd policy take on SolarWinds that seems to be coming from NSA and Cyber Command the notion that the Russians exploited NSAs domestic blind spot by using US infrastructure for their attack. That suggests that NSA wants to do more spying domestically, although no such proposal has surface. Nate, Dmitri, and I are united in thinking that the solution is a change in US law, though Dmitri thinks a know your customer rule for cloud providers is the best answer, while I think I persuaded Nate that empowering faster and more automatic warrant procedures for the FBI is doable, pretty much as we did with the burner phone problem in the 90s.

The courts, meanwhile, seem to be looking for ways to bring back a Potter Stewart style of jurisprudence for new technology and the fourth amendment: I cant define it, but I know it when it creeps me out. The first circuits lengthy oral argument on how long video surveillance of public spaces can continue without violating the fourth amendment is a classic of the genre.

Dmitri and Nick weigh in on Facebooks takedown of Chinese hackers using Facebook to target Uighurs abroad.

Dmitri thinks we can learn policy lessons from the exposure (and likely sanctioning) of the private Chinese companies that carried out the operation.

Dmitri also explains why CISAs head is complaining about the refusal of private companies to tell DHS which US government agencies were compromised in SolarWinds. The companies claimed that their NDAs with, say, Treasury meant that they couldnt tell DHS that Treasury had been pawned. Thats an all too familiar example of federal turf fights hurting federal cybersecurity.

In our ongoing feature, This Week in U.S.-China Decoupling, we cover the Disaster in Alaska evaluate the latest bipartisan bill to build a Western technology sphere to compete with Chinas sector, note the completely predictable process ousting of Chinese telecom companies from the US market, and conclude that the financial sectors effort to defy the gravity of decoupling will be a hard act to maintain.

Always late to embrace a trend, I offer Episode 1 of the Cyberlaw Podcast as a Non-Fungible Token to the first listener to cough up $150, and Nick explains why it would be cheap at a tenth the price, dashing my hopes of selling the next 354 episodes and retiring.

Nick and I have kind words for whoever is doxxing Russian criminal gangs, and I suggest offering the doxxer a financial reward (not just a hat tip in a Brian Krebs column.) We have fewer kind words for the prospect that AI will soon be able to locate, track, and bankrupt problem gamblers.

I issue a rare correction to an earlier episode, noting that Israel may not have traded its citizens health data for first dibs on the Pfizer vaccine. It turns out that what was deidentified aggregate health data, Israel offered Pfizer which with proper implementation may actually stay aggregate and deidentified. And I offer my own hat tip to Peter Machtiger, for a student note in an NYU law journal that cites the Cyberlaw Podcast, twice!

And more!

Download the 355th Episode (mp3)

You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!

The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.

Here is the original post:
The Cyberlaw Podcast: Can Editorial Middleware Cut the Power of the Big Platforms? - Lawfare