Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Moon’s Path In Front of Sun Eclipsed Malia Obama’s Harvard Move-In – NBCNews.com

Malia Obama's hair flies into the air as a cold wind hits her and President Barack Obama while descending the steps of Air Force One upon their arrival at O'Hare Airport in Chicago on April 7, 2016. KEVIN LAMARQUE / Reuters

After graduating from Sidwell Friends School in 2016, the oldest Obama daughter decided to take a

Malia not only got some down time traveling with family, but interned in New York City at

Malia was 10-years-old when she came into the national limelight after her father was elected the first Black president in 2008. After growing up in the White House, she is starting a new chapter as a young woman away from her parents and Washington.

Related:

Former president Obama is known to get emotional when talking about his daughters growing up. In an interview with Ellen DeGeneres in 2016, Obama joked he would be wearing dark glasses, sobbing at Malias graduation. He

The first day of fall classes at Harvard is August 30, 2017.

Follow NBCBLK on

See the rest here:
Moon's Path In Front of Sun Eclipsed Malia Obama's Harvard Move-In - NBCNews.com

Obama’s former staffers hope to build upon his legacy as they run for office – Los Angeles Times

When bidding farewell to the nation in January, President Obama urged perseverance in the face of political change.

If youre disappointed by your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures and run for office yourself, he said.

Dozens of people who worked in his administration or on his presidential bidshave taken that call to action to heart, with several top political aides, policy staff and ambitious millennials from the Obama era mounting campaigns of their own right here in California. All are Democrats, and some of their races could be tipping points in the 2018 midterms as the party attempts to win back control in Washington.

Among the former government officials is Ammar Campa-Najjar, who is seeking to oust Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter in San Diego County.

Born in the U.S. to a Mexican mother and a Palestinian father, Campa-Najjar recalls questioning if his fellow Americans would ever truly accept him in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

He brooded and struggled, but his faith was renewed when another biracial man with a unique name and an absent father, Barack Obama, won the presidency of the United States.

In 2008, the country said, Yes, we can, and elected this skinny brown kid with a funny name. It really kind of inspired me, said Campa-Najjar, 28.

In the short term, that resulted in Campa-Najjar interning at the White House, where he was assigned the task of reading the letters Americans sent the president about their heartbreak and their victories, and helping select the 10 that were sent to Obama for him to read himself daily. He later worked in the Department of Labor and on Obamas 2012 reelection campaign.

Today, he is among the youngest congressional candidates in the nation. And he is one of several former Obama campaign and administration officials who are running for office across the nation at all levels of government.

Its not unusual for political staffers to seek elected office, but the number of Obama alumni who have entered the field for the 2018 election is notable. In California alone, there are at least four congressional candidates who worked for Obama, as well as several others seeking legislative and statewide posts.

Their campaigns are driven by the election of President Trump, fewer opportunities in Washington, D.C., with Republicans in control of the White House and Congress, and the desire to protect and build upon the former presidents legacy.

Coming out of the Obama administration, people are particularly motivated by what Donald Trump has been trying to do to this country, said Bill Burton, who served as a spokesman for Obama during the 2008 campaign and his first term in office and is now a Democratic operative in Southern California.

He added that early Obama supporters who signed on at a time when Hillary Clinton was perceived as the unstoppable nominee have already shown a natural willingness to take on long odds, a quality that can help them achieve their own political goals.

When I started working for [Obama], the only person in America who thought he was going to win the Iowa caucuses was him, Burton said.

The congressional candidates in California are all running in districts historically dominated by the GOP.

Sam Jammal is trying to defeat Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton), who has represented Orange County in Congress for nearly 25 years. Jammal said his experience growing up in the district as the child of immigrants, attending law school and then working on Obamas 2008 campaign and in the Department of Commerce proved to him that anything is possible.

Our story is the embodiment of that, said Jammal, whose parents are from Jordan and Colombia. The same day my dad landed here, he was working at a gas station . For me, his youngest son, I was able to work for the president of the United States. My proudest moment in the administration was taking my parents to a White House naturalization ceremony where they were able to meet President Obama. Its full circle.

Others, including Eleni Tsakopoulos Kounalakis, said they expected Clinton to win the November 2016 election, giving them the opportunity to work for the first woman president. The experiences the Sacramento-area native had as Obamas ambassador to Hungary cemented her desire to continue working in public life once he left office.

It took me a few months after the election to recalculate how I could best serve, said Kounalakis, who is one of two Obama alumni running for lieutenant governor. It [became] clear: It was more important than ever that California lead the way on our values, whether its fighting for the climate or supporting and celebrating our immigrant community and our LGBT community.

Trumps actions since taking office, including trying to institute a travel ban on people from several Muslim-majority nations and withdrawing from the Paris climate accord, quickened the Obama alums resolve. But nearly all said Trumps recent statements placing neo-Nazis and white supremacists who violently protested in Charlottesville on the same moral plane as those who protested against them exemplified why they decided to run.

What has happened with this presidency and what Donald Trump stands for and believes in is in such stark contrast to everything we worked on for eight years, said Buffy Wicks, a grass-roots organizer who worked on Obamas campaigns and as the White House deputy director of public engagement. She is now running for the California Assembly.

But an impressive political rsum is no guarantee of success.

Ultimately, the races will come down to how voters connect with the politicians and their policies, said Massachusetts state Sen. Eric Lesser, who went from shepherding luggage during the 2008 campaign to working steps from the Oval Office as the top aide to one of Obamas must trusted advisors, David Axelrod.

Show, dont tell. You have to be elected on your own merits and your own vision, and ideas for your community, he said.

While Lesser speaks reverently about his time working for Obama and Axelrod and the counsel he received from them during his 2014 campaign, he noted that voters want to hear how a candidate is going to address their needs, not about his time in Washington.

Expecting people to suddenly be impressed or suddenly open doors because of a previous fancy job is not going to happen, he said.

Expecting people to suddenly be impressed or suddenly open doors because of a previous fancy job is not going to happen.

Eric Lesser, former Obama White House aide elected to the Massachusetts state Senate in 2014

Lesser recalled that when he mounted his 2014 run, the best advice he received was from Obama, who told him to outhustle his rivals and connect with the people who would become his constituents.

He asked, How many people are in the district? How many households? How many doors? Lesser said. When I ran the numbers, he goes, You can meet all those people. I havent quite met everyone, but I took his advice to heart.

Follow California politics by signing up for our email newsletter

Reed Galen, who worked for President George W. Bush, said that while some administration posts could be particularly relevant to a race one Obama administration official who worked on the auto industry bailout is now running for Congress in Michigan, for example most candidates with such experience probably worked in a vast bureaucracy that few voters know or care about.

My guess is most of these folks, the best thing they have going for them is a picture of them and the president [that shows] Barack Obama reasonably knows who I am, said Galen, a former California GOP operative who worked on both of Bushs campaigns and in his administration.

The greater advantages, he said, are the relationships forged with donors, leaders, strategists and the alumni network that remains tightly knit after their tenure ends.

Wicks fundraisingreport illustrates the political value of the connections that come from working for Obama. Axelrod, elected officials including former Rep. Gabby Giffords of Arizona, and scores of people from Washington, D.C., have donated to her campaign, names unlikely to appear on the donor list for most other California legislative candidates.

Wicks campaign also follows a grass-roots blueprint she helped craft for Obama when he was unknown, introducing himself to voters in diners and coffee shops and talking about their concerns.

Im doing house parties all over the district, really spending a lot of time in living rooms, 20 to 30 people at a time and having a really thoughtful conversation about what kind of community do we want to live in, she said. Its a way to build relationships with voters, investing on the front end of that relationship and not just plying you with direct mail pieces and television ads.

And for those who lack Wicks campaign experience, the connections to some of the top Democrats in the nation is invaluable.

When you havent been an elected official before, you have a lot of questions . You understand the policies, you know what your positions are, but the actual architecture of running a campaign is something thats inherently new, said Brian Forde, who worked on technology in the Obama administration and is now trying to topple Republican Rep. Mimi Walters in Orange County.

Whats most helpful is being able to pick up the phone or send a text message to a friend who was a speechwriter for the president or the first lady, or someone who did work on communications who does understand all of these things because they worked on the campaign, Forde said.

seema.mehta@latimes.com

For the latest on national and California politics, follow @LATSeema on Twitter.

ALSO

'Art of the Deal' writer predicts that Trump will resign by the end of the year

Defending Confederate memorials, Trump equates Gens. Lee and Jackson with Presidents Washington and Jefferson

Trump succeeds where Obama failed spawning a new wave of liberal activism

Live coverage of California politics

Read the rest here:
Obama's former staffers hope to build upon his legacy as they run for office - Los Angeles Times

We also heard ‘presidential equivocation’ from Obama – The Laconia Daily Sun

To The Daily Sun,

I find the continual hypocrisy of Democrats who write to The Daily Sun most entertaining. Robert T. Joseph, Jr. offers up the latest, special vintage. What's truly laughable is the non-stop, fiery, HATE MESSAGE spewed at Trump by people who 30 seconds later demonize others for spreading their hate message, like those in Charlottesville. Its okay for the Trump haters to shout their HATE MESSAGE toward him, but not others to spread theirs, all while Bernie Sanders spreads his own "special brand." Bernie hates the rich. He says so every place he goes. Wake up! HATE IS HATE, no matter what vehicle or model it chooses to ride in. Too bad, hypocrisy isn't like a wart on the end of a nose that can be seen in a mirror. If it were, Mr. Joseph would see a troll when he looks at his own reflection.

Here's my point. If you were outraged Trump had to be dragged to the wood shed screaming to denounce the happenings in Charlottesville why weren't you screaming outrage over how Obama reacted when five police officers were shot in Dallas last year? Obama said " there was no justification for violence against law enforcement." THEN HE COUCHED with his "political cover card," describing what he interpreted as rampant, racial inequality in law enforcement just to make sure there was no confusion to Democrats and Blacks where his real sympathies lay. All while five cops lied stone cold dead, in pools of their own blood, riddled with bullet holes.

The same "Obama cop out", cover your political derrire happened in Baltimore in 2015 following several days of street rioting, property torching, and looting after a black man died in police custody. Obama, dutifully condemned the rioters ( just as Trump condemned the white supremacists) but Obama also said the following to make sure no voters were lost: "We have seen too many instances of police officers interacting with individuals, primarily African American, often poor, in ways that raise troubling questions." In other words, rioting, and looting are wrong, but black people may have good cause to burn Baltimore down given the embedded racism I see in the criminal justice system.

What we heard from Trump last Saturday when he said, "many sides were to blame for what took place in Charlottesville" was the same, exact PRESIDENTIAL EQUIVOCATION we heard from Obama time and time again after horrific violence occurred on his watch. Both Trump and Obama expressed their moral outrage, then both placated their supporters with "double speak" for political protection. White, Trump gets the gallows for doing it. Black, Obama got a free pass. That lopsided reaction personifies the brand of "IDENTITY POLITICS" strangling the Democracy Party today, and America with it. IDENTIFY POLITICS" is aimed specifically to spark and intensify the racial divide to produce an election advantage. How detestable , and repugnant is that? Now there's something we can all join hands to HATE!

Tony Boutin Gilford

Read the rest here:
We also heard 'presidential equivocation' from Obama - The Laconia Daily Sun

Trump Official Praises Oval Office Makeover, Blames Obama for Wallpaper Stains – Vanity Fair

No one knows exactly what the unnamed Trump official is implying, but it can't be good.

By Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

When Donald Trump returned to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue after his working vacation in Bedminster, the West Wing had undergone some radical changes. For one, Steve Bannon had been fired. But just as prominently, the White House had finally received a much-needed $3.4 million upgrade. While Trump deservedly caught some flack for allegedly calling the residence a dump, current and former administration staffers have admitted the property could use some sprucing up. The renovation, approved during the Obama administration, included updating a 27-year-old H.V.A.C. system, upgrading I.T. systems, and repairing the South Portico steps for the first time since the Eisenhower administration. Much like any fixer-upper project, though, the structural changes gave the new administration a chance to change the decoran opportunity that Trump, an amateur interior decorator with an eye for Louis XIV-style glitz, apparently seized with vigor.

CBS News toured the new digs, which include a refresh of the Navy mess, the West Wings V.I.P. lobby, and the Roosevelt Room, which is now a tribute to both our 26th president and Sheraton Conference Centers. (House Beautiful has some more before-and-after photos of the renovation, which showcase the White Houses preference for a neutral color palette of taupes and grays, a very on-trend look for the Fixer Upper and West Elm set.)

The Oval Office itself received a facelift, swapping out the midcentury modern furniture and curtains for some conspicuously gold-hued upholstery, and replacing Barack Obamas striped yellow wallpaper with a gray damask print that Trump picked out himself. (The wallpaper itself is temporary and may be changed when Trump picks out a permanent rug; a pragmatic choice for someone renting a room.)

Normally, this would be an uncontroversial process, newsworthy only to HGTV Magazine and Martha Stewart acolytes, but in Trumps White House, full of leaking and backstabbing and petty feuds, an unnamed source could not resist taking a swipe at his predecessors design choices:

[Mr. Trump] wanted to bring back the luster and the glory of the White House, said the White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Obama wallpaper was very damaged. There were a lot of stains on it, the official said.

This may be the first time in White House history that a White House official has gone on background to discuss something as mundane as a wallpaper refresh.

Some of the changes were more symbolic than cosmetic. Trump also selected politically relevant pieces of decor to offset his attempt at a muted color palette. He previously raised hackles when he chose a portrait of Andrew Jackson to hang in his office, added six extra flags behind his desk, and replaced a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. with one of Winston Churchill, complaining that Obama had given the bust back to the British government. (A false story, it turns out.) CBS News noted that Trump had added another touch to the Roosevelt Room: Two large, gilded eaglesacquired by G.S.A.s West Wing historian at a Maryland antique shopwhich now adorn pedestals in the large West Wing conference room.

By J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images.

By Charles Dharapak, FILE/AP Photo.

Courtesy William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

By Susan Biddle, White House, FILE/AP Photo.

From the White House Historical Association.

By John Bazemore/AP Photo.

PreviousNext

By J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images.

By Charles Dharapak, FILE/AP Photo.

Courtesy William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

By Susan Biddle, White House, FILE/AP Photo.

From the White House Historical Association.

By John Bazemore/AP Photo.

Link:
Trump Official Praises Oval Office Makeover, Blames Obama for Wallpaper Stains - Vanity Fair

Trump’s Afghan Strategy Is Different, and Braver, Than Obama’s – Bloomberg

U.S. President Donald J. Trump was right to jettison his initial instincts for a hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan and to articulate a firm, continued commitment to that country and the region in his speech on Monday night. The conventional wisdom was quick to dismiss the strategy as little different from that of President Barack Obama. But it is in fact a welcome departure from Obamas foreign policy in two critical ways.

First, Trump deserves credit for a decision that clearly goes against immediate political interests. Sure, this is a low bar; we should all want and expect our commander in chief to prioritize national security above voter popularity. But it is easy, when viewing the tumultuous and sometimes baffling Trump foreign policy, to forget how domestic political considerations were so often the driving force behind Obamas foreign policy. The best example of this is the drive to remove all U.S. forces from Iraq before the 2012 presidential elections.

Trumps advisors may try to spin the approach outlined in the Monday speech as consistent with his campaign rhetoric, but this is a tough sell. One just needs to look at Trumps pre-presidency tweets to see what a departure this is:

More important, Trumps new strategy discards the timeline under which Obamas Afghan strategy always labored. The significance of returning to the conditions-based approach of President George W. Bush -- that is, tying U.S. military presence to improvements in security, not domestically driven political timelines -- cannot be underestimated.

Nothing did more to undercut Obama's 2009 surge of troops into Afghanistan than his announcing in advance when Western forces would be pulled out. Given that no victory over the Taliban was conceivable, the only realistic objective of more military might was to bring the enemy to the negotiating table. Yet as long as waiting out U.S. resolve was a distinct option, compromise never seemed attractive to the Taliban, and the war dragged on. This is not just my opinion. It is also that of the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan under Obama, James Cunningham, who said as much to an audience at the Aspen Institute just last month.

Ditching the timeline will also help strengthen the nation's institutions critical to success. Afghans were reluctant to invest in a state when the chances of its failure seemed high; instead, many in important roles saw their time in government as little more than a chance to position themselves as well as possible for when the state collapsed. But now that the U.S. seems committed to staying, Afghans are more likely to see the state as worthy of their efforts to create a new reality.

Finally, losing the timeline could make a big impression on two countries that are not mentioned in Trumps speech, but are creating major obstacles to a better Afghan future: Iran and Russia. Both governments have upped their meddling, likely positioning themselves for what was perceived as an imminent American departure.

For all these reasons, removing an arbitrary timeline from the U.S. Afghan strategy will make it a significantly different approach than that tried under Obama -- with better prospects for success.

Yet, while appreciating these two points, I still find the new strategy wanting. As a former deputy national security adviser to President George W. Bush, I listened to the speech asking myself whether it would give all members of our government sufficient strategic guidance to put in place a winning plan. The answer was no. At least three major contradictions need to be resolved before what was outlined can be translated into an approach with some prospect of delivering a different outcome than the current stalemate acknowledged by General John W. Nicholson, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

First, Trump spoke of how a fundamental pillar of our new strategy is the integration of all instruments of American power: diplomatic, economic and military. No such speech could afford to say otherwise -- this phrase is the bread and butter of anyone who has worked in national security since the Sept. 11 attacks. Yet not only did Trump not explain how the non-military tools would be used in concert with physical force, he sowed doubt about their importance with his line we are not nation-building again, but killing terrorists.

I understand that nation-building may be the most unpopular phrase in America. But one cannot succeed in squelching terrorism and the spread of weapons of mass destruction without improving the military and civilian abilities of partner governments that face terrorist threats. Military engagement helps -- armies, air forces and police are critical institutions any society. But it is in the realm of nation-building that the nonmilitary instruments of national power truly come to bear. What is the purpose of diplomatic and economic efforts in Afghanistan if not to buttress the legitimacy and capacities of the Kabul government?

Second, Trump made his usual comments about how he will not provide the enemy with details about his military approach. But the president needs to keep in mind that his audience is not only the enemy; it is also, more importantly, the American people. If he wants to calibrate the U.S. military presence to conditions on the ground in Afghanistan, he will need to invest a lot of time and effort speaking to the American public about why Afghanistan is important and how what the U.S. is doing there is producing results. Obama rarely did this, even with tens of thousands of Americans deployed there.

Trump will have to be different, and specific, if he hopes to succeed -- and banalities about not telegraphing plans to the enemies will grow thin quickly. Americans arent interested in tactical or operational plans, but they do want to understand and have confidence in the strategy -- which will require sharing more details than offered on Monday night.

Finally, Trump glossed over the complexities of the U.S. relationship with Pakistan. For those who have worked on Afghanistan over the last 16 years, it was refreshing to hear an American president call Pakistan out on its troubling behavior. But there is an obvious tension between the ability of the U.S. to work with Pakistan on the larger agenda of nonproliferation and counterterrorism that goes beyond Afghanistan, and threatening to condition U.S. support for Islamabad based only on Pakistani actions in Afghanistan.

In a world in which terrorism and WMD have not yet been married but could be, Pakistan -- the fastest builder of nuclear weapons in the world -- has as least as much leverage over the U.S. as Washington does over Islamabad. The Trump administration may have decided to prioritize Afghanistan above all other interests in which Pakistan -- for better or worse -- has a role to play. If so, this approach requires some major contingency planning about other regional crises that may occur, and we can only surmise such planning is going on behind the scenes.

Trumps speech on Afghanistan was welcome on several fronts. But lets hope that it was just a telegraphed version of a much more developed strategy -- one that the president's team is laying out in much greater detail to the military and civilian leadership in the government right now, and one that he will take more time to explain to the American people in the future. If not, the kudos he gets for resisting a more politically popular short-term approach will be meaningless in the face of a long-term strategy full of unresolved contradictions.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Meghan L. O'Sullivan at Meghan_OSullivan@hks.harvard.edu

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tobin Harshaw at tharshaw@bloomberg.net

Read the original post:
Trump's Afghan Strategy Is Different, and Braver, Than Obama's - Bloomberg