Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Killing of George Floyd shows that years of police reform fall far short – Minneapolis Star Tribune

Minneapolis did everything Barack Obama asked it to.

Its mayor and City Council appointed a reform-minded police chief who emphasized a guardian mentality instead of a warrior one. They held listening sessions with the community and updated policies to create more transparency and accountability. They promoted officer wellness by offering yoga and meditation classes.

Yet none of this stopped officer Derek Chauvin from pinning his knee on the neck of George Floyd until he lost consciousness and died.

Minneapolis is a case study in a city that embraced the pillars of the final report from the Presidents Task Force on 21st Century Policing, a signature blueprint from the Obama era on how to reform American law enforcement. After five years, the city is no closer to achieving the primary objective of creating trust between police and the communities they serve.

After the killing of Floyd and the uprising against police that followed, culminating in the torching of the Third Precinct station, Minneapolis is at a crossroads. It can continue on the path of slow cultural change, or it can opt for a blank slate to end the current policing system as we know it, as City Council Member Alondra Cano, who heads the councils committee on public safety, said recently.

The 21st Century Policing model for reform came out of a moment similar to the one Minneapolis faces now. In August 2014, a white police officer shot and killed Michael Brown, a young black man, in Ferguson, Mo. The shooting and decision not to indict the officer laid bare long-standing civil unrest over racial disparities in policing and use of force. It led to protests and riots throughout the suburban St. Louis city and a federal investigation that determined the Ferguson Police Department engaged in a pattern of unlawful and racist policing.

In May 2015, the Presidents Task Force on 21st Century Policing released a report of recommendations for cities to move into a new era of law enforcement. The document emphasized the need for a cultural revolution in American police departments, which the authors said would come through more transparency and accountability. Police would have to reset their philosophy to focus on community policing rather than the militarized, warrior-minded tactics embraced by so many officers. The trust of skeptical citizens key to a functioning democracy, according to the report would come from police forces reflecting the values of the communities in which they work.

One barrier that has prevented Minneapolis from achieving these goals has been pushback from the police union and its president, Lt. Bob Kroll, against policy and culture change, said Michelle Phelps, a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota. Last year, when Mayor Jacob Frey announced Minneapolis would become the first city to ban warrior-style training, Kroll countered by publicly announcing free warrior training for rank-and-file officers.

Cultural change is really hard, Phelps said. We can see the resistance to this change in the election and re-election of Bob Kroll. And the union exerts its own independent push against reform.

There is also a bureaucracy that complicates the very idea of ground-level change. Phelps points out that Minneapolis is under jurisdiction of not only Minneapolis police, but also University of Minnesota police, park police, Metro Transit police and state and federal law enforcement, all of whom answer to different leadership hierarchies.

The Minneapolis Police Department has made some progress toward more accountability over the past five years. In 2016, following the police killing of Jamar Clark, a black man, the department updated its use-of-force policy with greater emphasis on sanctity of life. The new language made it possible for the city to take swift action against Chauvin and the other three officers who stood by and watched as Floyd pleaded that he couldnt breathe, Phelps said.

The fact that all four officers got fired immediately means something, she said. And yet its woefully inadequate.

Its too early to say whether Minneapolis is giving up entirely on the Obama model. A majority of the City Council has publicly committed to dismantling the police department, but they have yet to come to a clearly defined consensus of what that means. Phelps said even radical changes could end up looking more like a 21st Century Policing-plus model than an entirely new playbook.

The death of Floyd has moved the Overton window the range of ideas deemed politically acceptable insanely quickly, Phelps said. I think everybodys catching their breath and trying to figure out what that means.

The measure of success of a functional police department is also in the eye of the beholder, said Sandra Susan Smith, a sociology professor at University of California-Berkeley.

Communities of color in particular have historically seen the role of police as about confinement and control vs. protect and serve, Smith said. Through that lens, many Americans view efforts to make police more accountable as nibbling around the edges, rather than addressing the fundamental problems of policing head on.

Some people argue that police are doing exactly what theyre intended to do, she said.

The 21st Century Policing model is predicated on the philosophy that police are an important resource in communities, Smith said. Making dramatic changes including better training, more accountability and redirecting some police duties to other city departments could still be compatible with the Obama-era reform model.

What is incompatible is the abolition of the police, she said.

Earlier this month, the City Council approved a resolution for intent to create a transformative new model for cultivating safety in our city. Mayor Frey, who signed the resolution, is pushing for change within the current department, rather than starting over. What exactly changes will likely come down to Minneapolis voters in the form of a referendum, which some council members say could appear on the ballot this year.

In the meantime, unrest over American policing continues to generate protests across the country in the name of Floyd and other victims of police brutality. Many look to Minneapolis for what comes next.

Originally posted here:
Killing of George Floyd shows that years of police reform fall far short - Minneapolis Star Tribune

Michelle Obama shares what Juneteenth means to her – The Loop

Today marks an important day in history. On June 19th, 1865 (known now as Juneteenth), federal orders proclaimed the emancipation of the last remaining enslaved African-Americans in the American Confederacy. As a celebration of the freedom of Black people, the day serves as an important reminder that the fight for equality is far from over, and celebrities are taking to their social media platforms to remind us, as well.

Former First Lady and national treasure (international treasure?), Michelle Obama, took to Twitter Friday to tell her followers what the day means to her. As usual, her words were eloquent, and began by paying tribute to the history of the continued movement. Most of us were taught that slavery came to an end when President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. But as is so often the case, the full promise of this country was delayed for segments of the African-American community. And for enslaved people in Galveston, Texas, freedom didnt come until June 19th, 1865.

Continuing on, Michelle explained, What I love about Juneteenth is that even in that extended wait, we still find something to celebrate. Even though the story ha never been tidy, and Black folks have had to march and fight for every inch of our freedom, our story is nonetheless one of progress.

Michelle shared that she cant help but think of her own family through this lens, recognizing that both her grandfathers were the grandchildren of enslaved people, growing up in the Jim Crow South and later migrating north for a better life. But then they pressed forward with dignity and with purpose, raising good kids, contributing to their communities, and voting in every election, she went on. And even though they didnt live to see it themselves, I can see the smiles on their faces knowing that their great-granddaughters end up playing ball in the halls of the White House a magnificent structure built by enslaved Americans.

The Becoming author then followed up her tweet with another, asking her followers to join her in the pledge to use our voices and our votes to keep marching towards freedom.

Obama, of course, chimed in as well. In his tweet, the POTUS linked to an article titled Why Juneteenth Matters, and explained that Juneteenth has never been a celebration of victory, or an acceptance of the way things are. Its a celebration of progress. Its an affirmation that despite the most painful parts of our history, change is possibleand there is still so much work to do.

The Obama family joins the likes of many other political figures and celebrities who have taken to social media today to vocalize the importance of the day; many of whom noted that it should be deemed a national holiday.

Actress Lupita Nyongo shared her thoughts with her Twitter followers. Public holidays indicate the moments in history that are important to a nation and the values they hold dear. Recognizing #Juneteenth nationally would be one more way to acknowledge the intrinsic value of Black people and their history to the wealth and prosperity of the USA.

Earlier this week, Pharrell Williams spoke at a press conference in support of Virginia Gov. Ralph Northams call to make June 19th, an official state holiday commemorating the end of slavery. The musician told the audience, This is our chance to lead, to truly embrace the importance of Juneteenth and treat it as a celebration of freedom that black people deserve.

Selena Gomez, who has been using her platform to amplify black voices over the past two weeks, shared a heartfelt message yesterday, thanking the black community for their knowledge, eagerness to teach and commitment to ensuring Black voices are not silenced and urged all to mark Juneteenth. Please take the day to have conversations with your family and friends about the importance of Black Lives Matter and how we all need to join together to ensure equality and justice and then continue these conversations every day!

Read this article:
Michelle Obama shares what Juneteenth means to her - The Loop

7 Things: Supreme Court rules Trump can’t undo Obama executive order, Fauci suggests football may not be played even with no new lockdowns, states…

Club for Growth Action, the super PAC associated with Club for Growth, reported spending $851,070 on three federal races in Alabama this week, the majority of which will go towards running ads on television.

Most notably, in the Republican primary runoff for the U.S. Senate, the group reported spending $196,409 in support of former Auburn University head football coach Tommy Tuberville.

Members of the Republican Party are often divided over Club for Growth. Many cite it as a bastion of fiscal conservatism and limited government principles; others say that the groups opposition to President Donald Trump during the 2016 primaries and continuous objections to the Farm Bill prove that it is out of touch with key conservative constituencies.

624

The Club was an ardent supporter of Jeff Sessions while he was in the Senate, but earlier in 2020 decided to support Tuberville a few days after the former Auburn coach was endorsed by Trump. In contrast to the other primaries in the state, the PAC so far is refraining from attacking Sessions and instead solely focusing their resources on supporting Tuberville.

In addition to Tuberville, the group is backing former State Representative Barry Moore (R-Enterprise) and former State Senator Bill Hightower (R-Mobile) in the states two open congressional primaries.

The group often intervenes in primaries where they believe they can help elect a potential ally.

Notable Club for Growth-backed politicians are U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rand Paul (R-KY).

In the Republican primary runoff for Alabamas Second Congressional District, the super PAC reported spending a total of $484,375 in the past week, with $383,842 of it going towards airing ads on television.

Barry Moores opponent in the AL-02 primary runoff is Dothan businessman Jeff Coleman, who has been endorsed by the Alabama Farmers Federations political arm.

In terms of Club for Growth money, $316,579 was spent opposing Coleman, and $167,796 was spent supporting Barry Moore.

In an email to supporters, Colemans campaign manager Dalton Dismukes criticized Moore for welcoming the groups support, and described the Club For Growth as a special interest group made up of a small group of disgruntled Never-Trumpers who are anti-farmer, pro-China, and weak on many other issues critical to our district.

The original never-Trump, anti-farmer Super PAC Club for Growth is up to their old swamp tactics again. Its disturbing that Barry Moore would welcome this group into our state after they ran millions of dollars in attack ads against Donald Trump in 2016, Dismukes stated. [N]ot only has Club targeted our President, but they have also targeted the livelihood of our farmers and producers by routinely opposing the Farm Billand other critical needs that support farmers and agribusiness across our district.

Jonathan Barbee, a consultant for Moore, said that it was sad that Mr. Dismukes has already resorted to mudslinging, and added, Barrys always supported farmers and agribusiness across District 2; he even grew up on a farm and has a degree in agriculture.

The Clubs favorite candidate in Alabama, at least by money spent, appears to be Hightower in AL-01. The group has spent more than $1 million since the start of the 2020 cycle with the goal of getting Hightower elected, including $170,286 in the last week.

Hightowers opponent on July 14 is Mobile County Commissioner Jerry Carl, who has also been endorsed by the Alabama Farmers Federations political arm. The entirety of Clubs spending in AL-01 during the past week has gone to opposing Carls campaign.

Additionally, Stephen Moore, a past president of Club for Growth and former economic adviser to President Donald Trump, endorsed Hightower this past week.

Carl called on Hightower to renounce the endorsement due to Moores alleged adulterous behavior and his heinous comments about women and minorities. Hightower did not respond to Carl, and called Moore a Major Endorsement in a Facebook post.

A representative in the communications department of Club for Growth did not immediately respond to Yellowhammer News request for comment.

The groups ad supporting Tuberville focuses on Trumps endorsement.

Club for Growths ads supporting Hightower focuses on the candidates record while an Alabama state senator, as well as his support for term limits.

Their ad opposing Carl zeroes in on a 2019 clip where Carl indicates favorability to raising the gas tax in Alabama.

Clubs ad supporting Moore focuses on the candidates early endorsement of then-candidate Trump.

Club For Growth Actions ad(s) opposing Coleman have not yet been made publicly available.

Henry Thornton is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can contact him by email:henry@yellowhammernews.comor on Twitter@HenryThornton95

Here is the original post:
7 Things: Supreme Court rules Trump can't undo Obama executive order, Fauci suggests football may not be played even with no new lockdowns, states...

V.A. Secretary Robert Wilkie: This Is Not The "Scandal-Plagued V.A. Of The Obama Administration" – FOX News Radio

On Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla, V.A. Secretary Robert Wilkie explained why President Trump has done more for America's veterans than any other elected official, and gave an example of why the V.A. is during better now than under President Obama.

"This is not the scandal plagued V.A. of the Obama Administration and I certainly don't mind saying that. I will shout that from the rooftops. And this President, as I said yesterday in the White House, you can't find another president in American history who first as a candidate, and then as a president, put veterans at front and center. And the proof is there."

"In a normal month, we have 40,000 mental health tele-encounters. In the month of April, we had over 900,000. This allows veterans to talk to us without the pressure of going into a large clinical setting, without the pressure on their families to get them hundreds of miles to a V.A. center. So it is an all encompassing thing and it's about time."

See the article here:
V.A. Secretary Robert Wilkie: This Is Not The "Scandal-Plagued V.A. Of The Obama Administration" - FOX News Radio

Did Putin save Israel from Obama at UN, and why are we hearing this now? – The Jerusalem Post

Three and a half years after UN Security Council Resolution 2334 condemning Israeli settlement activity passed thanks to an US abstention, as opposed to their usual veto, new details published this week raised new questions.When the resolution passed in December 2016, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his governments representatives in the US were furious.Ambassador to the US Ron Dermer said he has evidence that the Obama administration not only abstained from the vote, but pushed and supported the resolution forward. US Ambassador to Israel at the time Dan Shapiro denied the claims and maintained on Wednesday that Resolution 2334 was not a US initiative, which it technically was not Venezuela, Senegal, New Zealand and Malaysia were the sponsors.But in 2019, a New York Times Magazine article featured a quote from an anonymous member of the Obama White House somewhat confirming Dermers account, saying that they ensured the vote would only take place after the November 2016 election in order not to scare donors away from Hilary Clintons presidential campaign. An Israeli source said this week that Obama aides worked on the text, as well.Comments by Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon at the time summed up the feeling in Jerusalem.To be in a room and see all the other member states voting against Israel, and the US allowing it to happen, was a moment I will never forget, Danon said. I think the resolution was the lowest place in decades regarding Israel and the US at the UN. We did work with the US mission very closely and we achieved a lot of things together, but that shameful vote will be what people remember of president Obamas presidencyThey will remember that moment when the US abandoned Israel and allowed a one-sided resolution to pass.But it turns out the acrimony in Danons words and those of others, were hiding what was, in Israels eyes, even more egregious behavior by then US president Barack Obama and his administration.An Israeli source confirmed most of the details of an account in Israel Hayom this week, that Obama pushed a second UN Security Council resolution that would be damaging to Israel, and Netanyahu ended up convincing Russian President Vladimir Putin to threaten a veto. The resolution was never actually submitted to the UNSC, because it had no chance to pass.Netanyahu hinted at the story in an election rally in Maaleh Adumim in February, but a clearer picture came out of the Israel Hayom article, which says the prime minister told the full story in a closed meeting this week.Months before Resolution 2334 passed, journalist David Zeev Jablinowitz, who was a correspondent for Israel Radio in 2016, spoke to Obama in October of that year and confirmed that part of the story. The then-president told Jablinowitz he had a resolution in the works that would set the parameters for an Israeli-Palestinian final-status agreement that would include a Palestinian state and would include a time frame by which such talks should be completed, the journalist recounted.The impression I got from him was that he wanted to show he was a friend of Israel but [the resolution] was all about Netanyahu and the right-wing, he added.In December, Israel tried to block [Resolution 2334] and Obamas people worked behind the scenes to push it. He wouldnt take Netanyahus calls at the time, the source said. [Then president-elect Donald] Trump was also involved in trying to stop it. Egypt were sponsors of the resolution, but they pulled their sponsorship because of Trumps pressure.In his talks with various UN delegation, Danon found out that there was a second resolution that the Obama administration was quietly supporting, and informed Jerusalem.There was the resolution people know about and a second one, which was the parameters for a peace agreement, which included a Palestinian state based on pre-1967 lines with land swaps, the source said. The parameters would have paved the way for a General Assembly decision, and forced an outline of how peace agreement would look, which was more like what the Palestinians want and very far from the Trump plan.Danon appealed to his Russian counterpart Vitaly Churkin, and the matter went up to the Netanyahu-Putin level. The Russians did not agree to veto Resolution 2334 condemning settlements, but they were opposed to the second one, and generally did not approve of the Obama administration making these last-minute moves right before Trump took office.The Israeli source posited that the Obama administration did not want to be seen as less pro-Israel than Russia, so they backed down from the second initiative.Jablinowitz may have played his own part in the second resolution not going to a vote. During his October phone call, he suggested to Obama that he tell the US Embassy to Israels staff to reach out to the Zionist parties in the Knesset, suggesting that while the Israeli Left may want a two-state solution, they might not like it being imposed by a UNSC resolution. An Obama aide later contacted Jablinowitz to tell him he was right, and Labor and Meretz, in addition to everyone to their Right, did not support the idea.Shapiro denied the story: I dont know anything about promises Putin might have made, and I certainly wouldnt trust himThe idea that Israel had to be rescued by a Russian veto is false.There was no second resolution planned, and the first wasnt our initiative. Shapiro added that The Israeli administration knew that at the time.As for the claim that Obama would not take Netanyahus calls, Shapiro said it doesnt sound right, and he doesnt recall Netanyahu trying to call Obama at the time.Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova denied the report that Putin stopped the resolution, calling it "disinformation." Zakharova pointed out that Russia already recognized a Palestinian state in pre-1967 borders in 1988, and reaffirmed Russia's position in support of direct negotiations for a two-state solution.What is indisputable is that two days after Resolution 2334 passed, then secretary of state John Kerry gave a long speech on how the Obama administration envisions a two-state solution. The plan described in the speech is consistent with the Israeli sources description of the second resolution that never came to pass. There is still the question of why this story is coming out now, three-and-a-half years after Trump came into office.The answer is likely that it is politically beneficial to both Netanyahu and Trump, and the fact that the story came out in Israel Hayom, owned by Sheldon Adelson who supports them both, supports that theory.The Trump reelection campaign can use the story as a cudgel to attack Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, who was vice president under Obama, by associating him with yet another anti-Israel move.Netanyahu can send a similar message to Alternate Prime Minister Benny Gantz or to opponents on his Right that if Trump is voted out of office, they can expect a return to Obama-era relations with the US.In fact, the timing could not be more convenient for Netanyahu, who is currently trying to push for Israel to extend sovereignty to parts of the West Bank in July, in accordance with Trumps peace plan.He can make the argument that not annexing doesnt mean staying with the status quo and saving Israel from international censure, it means missing an opportunity and still opening Israel up to punitive measures from the world.

Follow this link:
Did Putin save Israel from Obama at UN, and why are we hearing this now? - The Jerusalem Post