Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Obama said there was never a better time to be alive. Trump thinks a ‘nasty’ world offers nothing but problems. – Washington Post

Addressing the United Nations last fall, President Barack Obama took a moment to highlight for fellow world leaders what he called the most important fact about the state of global affairs: Human existence on planet Earth is good and getting better.

War is down, he said, while life expectancy is up. Democracy is on the march, and science has beaten back infectious diseases. A girl in a remote village can download the entirety of human knowledge on a smartphone.

A person born today, Obama concluded, is more likely to be safer, healthier, wealthier and better-educated and to see a path to prosperity than at any time in human history.

President Trump does not inhabit this world.

To Trump, the world is a mess, as he said during a White House news conference this week with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

(Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)

In recent days, Trump authorized missile strikes on Syria, shifted rapidly to a tougher tone with Russia, and negotiated with Chinas authoritarian leader over what to do about North Koreas nuclear weapons program.

Its crazy whats going on, Trump said. Whether its the Middle East or you look at no matter where Ukraine whatever you look at, its got problems, so many problems.

Right now, he concluded, its nasty.

What a time to be alive.

To ordinary Americans, the gulf between the worldviews of the United States two most recent leaders could not be more vast.

But historians and foreign affairs analysts said that, despite their apparent contradictions, both things can be true. The world is always a mess. Bad things happen. There are crises. People die.

The question, they said, is how a president responds to the mess and how he frames the threat and the response to the public a challenge made more difficult in an age of immediate and nonstop news from across the world.

President Obama constantly reminded us that our own times are not uniquely oppressive, said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian and author at Rice University. Theres a feeling due to the 24-7 news cycle that everything is a crisis mode, when the fact of the matter is, Americans have it better now than ever before.

Throughout his campaign, Trump railed about the dangers and threats to Americans: inside the country in the form of undocumented immigrants and violent inner cities, and abroad in the form of Islamic State terrorists, swarms of refugees and rapacious U.S. trading partners.

Time and again, Obama sought to counter Trumps apocalyptic rhetoric by putting the purported threats in broader context and cautioning Americans not to succumb to fear or anger.

The Islamic State does not represent an existential threat to the country, Obama said in November 2015, just a few days after Islamic State terrorists killed 130 people in Paris. Rather, he said, they were nothing more than a bunch of killers with good social media.

Obama characterized most undocumented immigrants as hard-working strivers. Globalization caused discomfort for some workers, Obama acknowledged, but he was quick to emphasize the opportunities it provided for American ingenuity in new markets overseas.

Yes, were going through large, structural changes ... [and] all these things are creating a new politics for the world, said Simon Rosenberg, founder of NDN, a liberal think tank in Washington. The challenge is not to be overwhelmed but to manage them for ones own benefit. Thats where Trump is so flummoxed. He is more fearful of the changes than he is understanding the goal of the president is to manage them for the benefit of the United States.

That might have been Obamas goal, but the president recognized during his final year in office that his optimistic message to Americans was at risk of being overtaken by the chaotic images from abroad.

During a town hall-style event with young people in Malaysia in September, Obama said that the flow of information bombarding news consumers on televisions, computers and smartphones makes it appear as if the world is falling apart.

A war here, an environmental disaster there, and suddenly everybody is shouting and everybody hates each other, Obama said. And you get kind of depressed. You think, Goodness, whats happening?

But, Obama emphasized, if you had a choice of when to be born and you didnt know ahead of time who you were going to be what nationality, whether you were male or female, what religion but you had said, When in human history would be the best time to be born? the time would be now.

Steven Pinker, a psychology professor at Harvard University, has written that voluminous data back up Obamas argument. But he acknowledged that the former presidents message did fail to resonate during a rapid-fire campaign news cycle.

He has the facts behind him, but to get those facts, you cant read the daily news, Pinker said. If you only look at bad things, there are always bad things. Trump is right that there is a lot of nasty stuff going on. There always is, and unfortunately there probably always will be. The question is, is there more nasty stuff? The answer is no.

Unlike Obama, Trump is a voracious consumer of breathless, hyperbolic cable news programming. In the White House, he has continued to react, on Twitter, to the partisan debate and unfolding horrors on his television screen.

His message has consistently been that America is being taken advantage of because of Obamas weakness. China and Mexico are beating the United States on trade. Middle Eastern refugees are flowing across borders, causing chaos and crime. Immigrants are taking American jobs. We dont win anymore, Trump said repeatedly.

In his inaugural address, Trump described in stark terms problems he saw across the country as he began his presidency and said, This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.

To historian Rick Shenkman, author of Political Animals: How Our Stone-Age Brain Gets in the Way of Smart Politics, Trumps rhetoric appeals to base human instincts, hard-wired from prehistoric times, to be on guard for constant threats.

While some critics have suggested Trump exploits public fears, Shenkman believes he more effectively leverages public anger.

People who are in an angry mood want change, he said. They will take risks for change ... Modern political parties, and Trump in particular, have learned that if you keep people in a state of nonstop anger, they stand by you.

Yet historians said Trump, like other presidents, would have to shift to a more upbeat message as his presidency matures. A presidency cant feed on failure, Brinkley said.

Others suggested that Trumps recent pivot away from some of his foreign policy positions from the campaign such as calling NATO obsolete and threatening to label China a currency manipulator reflects a leader coming to terms with how complicated the world is and how difficult it will be to address the global challenges without allies and partners now that he is in charge.

Right now, there is a fear, and there are problems there are certainly problems, Trump said at the White House. But ultimately, I hope that there wont be a fear and there wont be problems, and the world can get along. That would be the ideal situation.

Visit link:
Obama said there was never a better time to be alive. Trump thinks a 'nasty' world offers nothing but problems. - Washington Post

Obama mourns death of Steelers chairman Dan Rooney – The Hill (blog)

Former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaEx-Pentagon chief: Its not Trumps military Justice Department must act on Puerto Rico North Korean official warns of preemptive strike of its own MORE on Thursday mourned longtime Pittsburgh Steelers chairman Dan Rooney, who died Thursday at 84.

In a statement Thursday, Obama said Rooney was a great friend of his.

"But more importantly, he was a great friend to the people of Pittsburgh, a model citizen, and someone who represented the United States with dignity and grace on the world stage," Obama said in the statement.

The former president said he knew Rooney would do a "wonderful job" when he named him to the post of U.S. ambassador to Ireland.

"And I know the people of Pittsburgh, who loved him not only for the Super Bowl championships he brought as the owner of the Steelers, but for his generosity of spirit, mourn his passing today."

The Steelers confirmed Rooney's death on Twitter.

Read more here:
Obama mourns death of Steelers chairman Dan Rooney - The Hill (blog)

Obama Foreign Policy & Trump’s Situation Resemble Britain before … – National Review

Last year, President Obama assured the world that we are living in the most peaceful, prosperous, and progressive era in human history, and that the world has never been less violent.

Translated, those statements meant that active foreign-policy volcanoes in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and the Middle East would probably not blow up on what little was left of Obamas watch.

Obama is the U.S. version of Stanley Baldwin, the suave, three-time British prime minister of the 1920s and 1930s. Baldwins last tenure (19351937) coincided with the rapid rise of aggressive German, Italian, and Japanese Fascism.

Baldwin was a passionate spokesman for disarmament. He helped organize peace conferences. He tirelessly lectured on the need for pacifism. He basked in the praise of his good intentions.

Baldwin assured Fascists that he was not rearming Britain. Instead, he preached that the deadly new weapons of the 20th century made war so unthinkable that it would be almost impossible for it to break out.

Baldwin left office when the world was still relatively quiet. But his appeasement and pacifism had sown the seeds for a global conflagration soon to come.

Obama, the Nobel peace laureate and former president, resembles Baldwin. Both seemed to believe that war breaks out only because of misunderstandings that reflect honest differences. Therefore, tensions between aggressors and their targets can be remedied by more talk, international agreements, goodwill, and concessions.

Ideas such as strategic deterrence were apparently considered by both Baldwin and Obama to be Neanderthal, judging from Baldwins nave efforts to ask Hitler not to rearm or annex territory, and Obamas lead from behind foreign policy and his pledge never to do stupid sh** abroad.

Aggressors clearly assumed that Obamas assurances were green lights to further their own agendas without consequences.

Iran routinely threatened U.S. Navy ships, even taking ten American sailors into custody early last year. Obama issued various empty deadlines to Iran to cease enriching uranium before concluding a 2015 deal that allowed the Iranians to continue working their centrifuges. Iran was freed from crippling economic sanctions. And Iran quietly received $400 million in cash (in the dead of night) for the release of American hostages.

All that can be said about the Iran deal is that Obamas concessions likely ensured he would leave office with a non-nuclear Iran soon to get nuclear weapons on someone elses watch.

Obama green-lighted the Syrian disaster by issuing a red line over the use of chemical weapons and then not enforcing it. When Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad called Obamas bluff, Obama did nothing other than call on Russian president Vladimir Putin to beg Assad to stop killing civilians with chemical weapons.

Nearly five years after Obama issued his 2012 red line to Syria, and roughly a half-million dead later, Assad remains in power, some 2 million Middle Eastern refugees have overrun Europe, and Assad is still gassing his own citizens with the very chemical agents that the Obama administration had boasted were removed.

Obamas reset policy with Russia advanced the idea that George W. Bush had unduly polarized Putin by overreacting to Russian aggression in the former Soviet republic of Georgia. But Obamas concessions and promises to be flexible helped turn a wary but opportunistic Putin into a bold aggressor, assured that he would never have to account for his belligerence.

Middle Eastern terrorism? Obama assured us that al-Qaeda was on the run and that the Islamic State was a jayvee organization. His policy of dismissing the phrase radical Islamic terrorism, along with his administrations weird assertions that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was largely secular and that jihad did not mean using force to spread Islam, earned the U.S. contempt instead of support.

Russia and China launched cyberattacks on the U.S. without worry of consequences. Both countries increased their defense budgets while ours shrank. China built artificial island bases in the South China Sea to intimidate its neighbors, while Russia absorbed Crimea.

North Korea built more and better missiles. Almost weekly, it threatened its neighbors and crowed that it would soon nuke its critics, the American West Coast included.

In other words, as was true of Europe between 1933 and 1939, the world grew more dangerous and reached the brink of war. And like Stanley Baldwin, Obama was never willing to make a few unpopular decisions to rearm and face down aggressors in order not to be forced to make far more dangerous and unpopular decisions later on.

Baldwin was popular when he left office, largely because he had proclaimed peace, but he had helped set the table for the inevitable conflict to be inherited by his successors, Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill.

Obama likewise ignored rumbling volcanoes, and now they are erupting on his successors watch.

In both cases, history was kind while Baldwin and Obama were in office but not so after they left.

Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author, most recently, of The Savior Generals. You can reach him by e-mailing [emailprotected]. 2017 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

READ MORE:

Read the original:
Obama Foreign Policy & Trump's Situation Resemble Britain before ... - National Review

Sweet: Obama Foundation ramps up fundraising – Chicago Sun-Times

Former President Barack Obamas foundation kicked up fundraising in the weeks since Obama left office on Jan. 20, disclosures released on Thursday show, landing the co-founder of Twitter as a major donor and, for the first time, soliciting contributions from smaller givers.

Evan Williams, now the CEO of the California-based website Medium, with his wife, Sara Morishige, donated between $750,000 and $1 million through another foundation, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

Williams is no stranger to the Obama orbit. In 2012, he donated $250,000 to Priorities USA Action, the super PAC created to bolster Obamas second term re-election bid.

Each year, in its annual IRS 990 filing, the Obama Foundation lists its major donors and the specific amount they give.

Each quarter, the foundation voluntarily discloses new givers but clouds how much money was given by stating the contribution only within a broad range. The Obama Foundation could but does not disclose more clearly each quarter to make sense of the numbers, since the ranges are so vast.

In its first quarter 2017 disclosure, the Obama Foundation reveals its first million-dollar plus donors, Ann and John Doerr and Cari and Michael Sacks.

John Doerr, a billionaire venture capitalist, and Michael Sacks, the chairman and CEO of GCM Grosvenor, an investor in the company that owns the Chicago Sun-Times, and adviser to Mayor Rahm Emanuel, are both on the Obama Foundation board.

The new filing, which is tucked in an obscure place on the Obama Foundation website shows Sacks kicked up his giving to more than $1 million. In the last donor posting on Dec. 16, 2016, the Sacks and the Doerrs were listed as giving between $500,001 and $1 million.

Obama declined to make direct asks for contributions while in the White House, though he did small events, such as private dinners with potential donors.

The higher level of major giving is expected to jump as the Foundation spreads its wings in programming and planning for the Obama Center, a library, museum and event space to be constructed in Jackson Park on Chicagos South Side. The Foundation also must raise hundreds of millions to pay for the building and endowment of the Obama Center.

The bulk of those small donor amounts have come in through web online contributions, Obama Foundation President Marty Nesbitt told the Sun-Times. We didnt turn that on until the President was out of office.

John Rogers Jr., a longtime friend of Obama and former first lady Michelle, and his daughter Victoria made an additional contribution to the foundation. Previously they gave between $250,000 and $500,000. On Thursday, they were listed in the $500,000 to $750,000 range. Rogers is an Obama Foundation board member and CEO and founder of Ariel Investments.

OBAMA FOUNDATION LEAPS INTO GLOBAL ARENA

The Obama foundation is also making its first international move, co-hosting a program in Berlin to take place on May 25 at the Brandenburg Gate with Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Obamas first domestic post-presidential speech will be on May 7, when Caroline Kennedy, who played a pivotal role in his 2008 election and went on to become his ambassador to Japan, awards him the 2017 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage award.

According to his office, Obamas first international appearance since leaving the White House will be in Milan, where he will be a keynoter on May 9 at the Global Food Innovation Summit.

Continue reading here:
Sweet: Obama Foundation ramps up fundraising - Chicago Sun-Times

Twitter co-founder among latest major donors to Obama Foundation – Chicago Tribune

The billionaire co-founder of Twitter is among the new donors to the Obama Foundation, which on Thursday made public the names of almost two dozen major donors from the first three months of the year.

Evan Williams and his wife, Sara Morishige, gave between $750,000 and $1 million to the foundation. Forbes put Williams' net worth at $1.29 billion.

Michael Sacks and his wife, Cari, of Highland Park, were one of two couples who have given money in the past and whose overall gifts now exceed $1 million. Sacks is chairman and CEO of GCM Grosvenor Capital Management, was once a top fundraiser for former President Barack Obama and is a close ally of Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Sacks is vice chairman of World Business Chicago, a group chaired by the mayor that seeks to foster economic growth in the city.

Silicon Valley venture capitalist John Doerr and his wife, Ann, have also now given more than $1 million, according to the foundation. He sits on the Obama Foundation's board, and Forbes put his net worth at $5.4 billion.

Another big giver: Joe Kiani and his wife, Sarah, whose overall giving is in the range of $500,000 to $750,000. He is founder and CEO of Masimo, an Irvine, Calif., company that makes medical monitoring devices.

Other Chicagoans who were previous donors also gave more. John Rogers Jr., a close friend to Obama, and his daughter, Victoria, are now in the range of $500,000 to $750,000 in overall gifts. He is the chairman and CEO of Ariel Investments. They previously were in the $250,000 to $500,000 range.

Gifts from Daniel Levin and his wife, Fay Hartog-Levin, now total $250,000 to $500,000. He is the founder of The Habitat Company, a major developer in Chicago. She was U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands from 2009-11 during Obama's first term.

The foundation's report for the first quarter of 2017 represents its first disclosure since Obama left office. Foundation officials had planned to ratchet up fundraising after he left.

Construction of the presidential center is expected to begin in 2018, and it is to open in 2021. The design of the prestigious project has not yet been revealed, but the center is to house Obama's archives, a museum and community gathering spaces to create a "center for citizenship." The cost is expected to be at least $500 million.

The foundation was created early in 2014 and had raised $7.35 million by the end of 2015. It has not yet released the amount raised during 2016, Obama's last full year in office.

The new donors were posted on the foundation's website. Every three months, the nonprofit group posts the names of contributors and their gift, which is listed in a range of dollars.

While Obama was in the White House, his foundation took no money from for-profit entities, federal lobbyists, or foreign nationals or agents. The restrictions no longer apply, but a foundation official said Thursday it will "continue to vet and publicly disclose all large contributions."

The posting Thursday reflects some changes. Top donors are in the $1 million-plus category, and there is also greater specificity for smaller donors, including some who gave in the range of $200 to $500.

Earlier, gifts of $200 or more were placed in a broad category: $200 to $100,000.

The foundation's quarterly postings lack the specificity of Federal Election Commission filings, which give the exact contribution to candidates for federal office. FEC reports also give information about donors, including their address, employer and occupation.

kskiba@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @KatherineSkiba

Read the original:
Twitter co-founder among latest major donors to Obama Foundation - Chicago Tribune