Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Revisiting Obama’s Energy Lies – Power Line (blog)

These days, the press is carrying on a running battle with the Trump administration. Pretty much every news story, every day, is intended to undermine President Trump and perhaps drive him from office. The New York Times, Washington Post and Associated Press are the worst offenders, but almost every news outlet is in this category.

It wasnt always that way. Until January, our press slavishly reported every pronouncement of the administration in power, sometimes reinforcing it, sometimes just letting it stand. This was its own form of fake news: Barack Obama and his minions would utter absurd pronouncements, and the press would report them as fact.

For years, we pointed out that President Obama was lying about energy. This post is one of several. Barack Obama let loose with his favorite pseudo-statistic, which, although he repeated it many times, was never challenged by any press outlet, to my knowledge:

I give out this statistic all the time, and forgive me for repeating it again: America holds about 2 percent of the worlds proven oil reserves. What that means is, is that even if we drilled every drop of oil out of every single one of the reserves that we possess offshore and onshore it still wouldnt be enough to meet our long-term needs. We consume about 25 percent of the worlds oil. We only have 2 percent of the reserves.

As I pointed out in the linked post and elsewhere, this was a calculated deception. Most people, listening to Obama recite this statistic, undoubtedly assumed that proven oil reserves means oil in the ground. Not true. In the U.S.but nowhere else in the worldproven oil reserves is a legal term, defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission:

The quantities of hydrocarbons estimated with reasonable certainty to be commercially recoverable from known accumulations under current economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations. Current economic conditions include prices and costs prevailing at the time of the estimate.

So in the U.S., proven oil reserves has nothing to do with the total amount of oil in the ground. It includes only those hydrocarbons that are commercially recoverable under current economic conditions (which means that when the price of oil increases, our proven reserves increase, too) and, most notably, under current government regulations. So, for example, ANWR has never been included in the tabulation of U.S. oil reserves, nor has offshore oil in the areasmost of themwhere drilling is prohibited by regulation, nor has oil on federal lands where current regulations dont allow it to be developed.

In fact, the U.S. has more fossil fuel reserves than any other country. More than Russia, more than Saudi Arabia. Fracking has alerted most Americans to the fact that we have far more recoverable oil than they thought, but it only scratches the surface of what we could do under a pro-America regime.

I am reminded of this by this story about the shale oil boom. Currently, the U.S. is producing more than 9 million barrels per day of oil. World-wide production is around 96 million barrels per day. Which means that the U.S. now accounts for 9 or 10 percent of the worlds oil production. That figure will grow, if the Trump administration follows through on the presidents promises.

Barack Obama wasnt confused, he was lying. He misrepresented Americas petroleum resources, over and over, because doing so served his anti-progress agenda. And to my knowledge, not a single news outletnot oneever pointed out that Obama was lying, even though everyone who knew anything about energy was aware of the deception. It is amazing how a change in administrations causes the press to completely reconceive its role.

See the rest here:
Revisiting Obama's Energy Lies - Power Line (blog)

10 reactions to Trump’s wiretapping allegations against Obama – Washington Post


Washington Post
10 reactions to Trump's wiretapping allegations against Obama
Washington Post
March 5, 2017 1:10 PM EST - Former director of national intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. on March 5 denied that President Trump's 2016 campaign was wiretapped while senators of both parties weighed in on the allegations. (Bastien Inzaurralde / The ...

Follow this link:
10 reactions to Trump's wiretapping allegations against Obama - Washington Post

Obama responds to Trump claim he ordered Trump Tower …

Former President Obama on Saturday denied President Trumps accusation that Obama had Trump Tower phones tapped in the weeks before the November 2016 election.

Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," said Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for the former president.

Trump made the claim in a series of early Saturday morning tweets that included the suggestion that the alleged wiretapping was tantamount to McCarthyism and Nixon/Watergate.

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism, Trump tweeted.

Is it legal for a sitting President to be wire tapping a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW! he said in another tweet.

Trump also tweeted that a good lawyer could make a great case of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!

How low has President Obama gone to tap (sic) my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergage. Bad (or sick) guy! the president continued.

Trump does not specify how he uncovered the Obama administration's alleged wiretapping.

However, he could be referencing aBreitbartarticle posted Friday that claimed the administration made twoForeign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) requests in 2016 to monitor Trump communications and a computer server in Trump Tower, related to possible links with Russian banks.

No evidence was found.

The article was based on a segment by radio hostMark Levin.

However, the timelines for each seems to draw from a range of news reports over the last several months, including those from The New York Times and Heat Street.

Lewis also said Saturday: "A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with anyindependent investigation led by the Department of Justice.

Former Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes tweeted earlier in the day: "No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you."

During Trump's Saturday morning tweets, he also brought up the ongoing controversy surrounding Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his reported 2016 meetings with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Trump said the first meeting between Sessions, a senator at the time, and Kislyak was arranged by the Obama administration.

He then said Kislayk also visited the White House nearly two dozen times during the Obama administration.

Just out: The same Russian Ambassador that met Jess Sessions visited the Obama White House 22 times, and 4 times last year alone, Trump wrote.

On Friday, Trump fought back against top Democratic lawmakers who are demanding his attorney general's resignation over past meetings with Russia's ambassador -- after pictures emerged of the same lawmakers in similar meetings, exposing them to "hypocrisy" charges.

Trump tweeted: "I hereby demand a second investigation, after Schumer, of Pelosi for her close ties to Russia, and lying about it.

Fox News' Serafin Gomez contributed to this story.

Link:
Obama responds to Trump claim he ordered Trump Tower ...

Lewandowski claims Obama WH listened in on Sessions, Russian envoy meetings – Fox News

Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said in an interview on Justice with Judge Jeanine Saturday that the Obama administration listened in on conversations between then-Sen. Jeff Sessions and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

What we have seen from the previous administration is they did spend time listening to conversations between then Senator Jeff Sessions and the ambassador to Russia while he was in his U.S. Senate office, Lewandowski told Fox News Jeanine Pirro. If that were to take place which supposedly did take place what other conversations are they listening in on.

Lewandowski, trying to connect the dots, said the previous administration said they were aware of two conversations Sessions had with Kislyak one time during the Republican National Convention and another in the U.S. Senate office.

And they were monitoring who (Sessions) was having a conversation with from what I understand, Lewandowski said. If that is the case, that is very concerning. Is it possible that the previous administration was listening to the conversations that took place in Trump Tower from their political opponents? If that is the case, and what Donald Trump alludes to is accurate, then thats very disturbing.

The Justice Department said Wednesday that Sessions did meet with Kislyak twice in 2016. The first was an office visit that occurred in Sessions capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the second took place in a group setting with other ambassadors following a Heritage Foundation speech, which was sponsored by the Obama State Department.

President Trump claimed earlier Saturday that Obama had Trump Tower phones tapped in the weeks before the November 2016 election. He made the claim in a series of tweets that included the suggestion that the alleged wiretapping was tantamount to McCarthyism and Nixon/Watergate.

Trump does not specify how he uncovered the Obama administration's alleged wiretapping.

Former President Obama denied Trumps accusation.

Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," said Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for the former president.

Go here to read the rest:
Lewandowski claims Obama WH listened in on Sessions, Russian envoy meetings - Fox News

Trump accuses Obama of ‘Nixon/Watergate’ wiretap but offers no evidence – Washington Post

(Thomas Johnson,Claritza Jimenez/The Washington Post)

President Trump on Saturday angrily accused former president Barack Obama of orchestrating a Nixon/Watergate plot to tap the phones at his Trump Tower headquarters in the run-up to last falls election, providing no evidence to support his explosive claim and drawing a flat denial from Obamas office.

Leveling the extraordinary allegation about his predecessor in a series of four early morning tweets, Trump said Obama had been wire tapping his New York offices and suggested that the former president had meddled with the very sacred election process. Obamas supposed actions, Trump said, amounted to McCarthyism.

Bad (or sick) guy! the 45th president tweeted about the 44th, insisting that the surveillance efforts resulted in nothing found.

Senior U.S. officials with knowledge of a wide-ranging federal investigation into Russian interference in the election, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified information, said Saturday that there had been no wiretap of Trump.

Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for Obama, said in a statement: A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false.

Officials at the FBI and the Justice Department declined to comment.

According to senior administration officials, White House Counsel Donald McGahn and his office are inquiring about possible surveillance of then-candidate Trump while being sensitive to legal and national security considerations.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said McGahn is reviewing what options, if any, are available to us.

It could not be immediately determined whether there had been wiretaps of anyone in Trumps orbit who might be a subject of the Russia probe. Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.) told MSNBC on Friday that he believes transcripts exist that would show whether Russian officials colluded with Trumps campaign.

Wiretaps in a foreign intelligence probe cannot legally be directed at a U.S. facility without probable cause reviewed by a federal judge that the phone lines or Internet addresses at the facility were being used by agents of a foreign power or by someone spying for or acting on behalf of a foreign government.

Ben Rhodes, a longtime national security adviser to Obama, tweeted at Trump: No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.

Neither Trump nor his aides offered any citation to back up Trumps accusation about Obama. Trump may have been prompted by a report on the conservative website Breitbart and commentary from talk radio host Mark Levin suggesting that the Obama administration used police state tactics to monitor the Trump team. The Breitbart report circulated among Trumps senior aides Friday and early Saturday, and Trump may have simply been reacting to the piece when he took to his preferred megaphone, Twitter, to trumpet his claim.

Trumps tweets punctuated a general feeling shared by the president, his advisers and allies that Obama and the Deep State of critics within the intelligence community who they think are fueling stories on Trump and Russia have been conspiring to derail his presidency. At the heart of each of the presidents tweets is Trumps apparent belief that Obama himself as opposed to members of his administration had been personally overseeing surveillance of Trump Tower.

The conservative media landscape including Sean Hannitys show on Fox News and Infowars, the conspiracy website run by Alex Jones, outlets on which Trump has appeared has in recent days given birth to tales of Obama and his closest confidants trying to spur Trumps impeachment or force his resignation.

But separately, the president is furious that a slow churn of revelations about communications between Attorney General Jeff Sessions, ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn and other Trump associates and Russian officials has overshadowed the early weeks of his administration. And he has grown fixated on identifying leakers.

Hes angry, and he thinks that the leaks even forgetting the rhetoric on politics are a significant problem that hurts the security of the country, said Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a close friend who chaired Trumps inauguration. He feels if he cant rely on his team, if he were negotiating with North Korea on something sensitive and death by a thousand leaks continued, he views that as really being disruptive to the security of America.

Trump has directed his aides to investigate employees across the federal government, with a particular focus on holdovers from the Obama administration and career intelligence officers, who Trump believes are trying to sabotage him.

White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon has been in close touch with the president about what he has called the Deep State. Bannons remarks in a recent speech about the deconstruction of the administrative state were designed in part to raise alarm among activists on the right about entrenched bureaucrats in the intelligence and defense agencies, according to White House officials.

Roger Stone, a longtime political adviser to Trump who does not work in the administration but still talks with the president, said he is urging Trump to fire and prosecute anyone who leaks damaging information.

What the president doesnt understand is he has more power than he knows, Stone said. He needs to clean house. Just clean house! Hand the pink slips to everybody. ... Lock them out of their offices and tell the FBI to start going through their emails and phone messages.

Trump was incensed over Sessionss decision to recuse himself from the Russia probe after The Washington Post reported that Sessions had met twice with the Russian ambassador but then testified falsely at his Senate confirmation hearing that he did not have communications with the Russians.

In the Oval Office on Friday morning, Trump fumed at his senior staff about the Sessions situation and told them that he disagreed with the attorney generals move, according to senior White House officials who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Trump told aides that he thought the White House and Justice Department should have done more to counter the argument that Sessions needed to step away. Trump said he wanted to see his staff fight back against what he saw as a widespread effort to destabilize his presidency, the officials said.

Trump then departed for Palm Beach, Fla. in what one associate described as a [expletive] bad mood to spend the weekend at his private Mar-a-Lago Club, where he fired off Saturday mornings tweets alleging wiretaps.

Trump amended his public schedule Saturday to add an early evening meeting with Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly, as well as dinner with both men and other advisers, including Bannon.

If the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approved a wiretapping order on one of Trumps associates, that would mean the federal judge involved had decided there was probable cause that the person was colluding with a foreign government.

Some current and former intelligence officials cast doubt on Trumps wiretapping assertion.

Its extremely unlikely that there would have been any sort of criminal or intelligence surveillance of Trump, said Jennifer Daskal, a former senior Justice Department national security official. Theres no credible evidence yet to suggest that that happened. It would be an extraordinary measure for the FBI to ask for and the court to grant a surveillance order on a presidential candidate of the opposing party in an election year.

Most Republican leaders were quiet on the issue Saturday, but Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) vowed at a town hall meeting with constituents to get to the bottom of this. He said it would be the biggest scandal since Watergate if Obama illegally spied on Trump or if a judge approved a warrant to monitor Trumps campaign for possible communications with Russia.

Im very worried that our president is suggesting that the former president has done something illegally, Graham said. At the same time, because of what it would signal, I would be very worried if in fact the Obama administration was able to obtain a warrant lawfully about Trump campaign activity with foreign governments.

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) called for Trump to provide the public more information about his charges. We are in the midst of a civilization-warping crisis of public trust, and the Presidents allegations today demand the thorough and dispassionate attention of serious patriots, Sasse said in a statement.

Democrats, meanwhile, blasted Trump. Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said the president leveled a spectacularly reckless allegation against Obama without evidence.

Referencing Trumps description of Obama as a bad (or sick) guy, Schiff said in a statement, If there is something bad or sick going on, it is the willingness of the nations chief executive to make the most outlandish and destructive claims without providing a scintilla of evidence to support them.

Daskal, who now teaches law at American University, agreed. It is extremely dangerous for the president to be suggesting that he was being surveilled for political purposes, when there is absolutely no evidence of that fact, she said.

Jenna Portnoy in Palm Beach, Fla., and David Weigel and Matt Zapotosky in Washington contributed to this report.

Continued here:
Trump accuses Obama of 'Nixon/Watergate' wiretap but offers no evidence - Washington Post