Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill – NPR

The United States Capitol building in Washington, D.C. Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call,Inc. hide caption

The United States Capitol building in Washington, D.C.

On Thursday the GOP-controlled House voted to overturn an Obama administration rule designed to keep firearms out of the hands of some people deemed mentally ill.

The action was the latest move by Congressional Republicans to undo several of President Obama's regulations on issues such as gun control and the environment though an arcane law called the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.

The National Rifle Association had pushed for the repeal, and Republicans argued it infringed upon Second Amendment rights by denying due process.

Supporters of the rule argued it was designed to stop mentally ill persons from getting firearms.

"The House charged ahead with an extreme, hastily written, one-sided measure that would make the American people less safe," Rep. Elizabeth Esty, D-Conn., said, according to The Hill. Esty represents Newtown, Conn., where a mentally ill man shot and killed 20 six- and seven-year-olds and six adults.

NPR's Nathan Rott reports that the Senate also passed a resolution to undo the Obama administration's Stream Protection Rule, also largely along party lines, by using the CRA. The goal of the rule was to minimize coal mine pollutants in waterways, and would have required coal companies to monitor water quality in nearby streams during mining operations. Republicans argued the law was too burdensome and would kill jobs in the coal industry.

Go here to read the rest:
House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill - NPR

Barack Obama Rocks His Hat Backwards While Vacationing in the British Virgin Islands – Entertainment Tonight

Playing Barack Obama Rocks His Hat Backwards While Vacationing in the British Virgin Islands

Island vibes!

Barack Obama was spotted in full vacation mode on Tuesday, rocking his hat backwards while taking a stroll in the British Virgin Islands with his wife, Michelle Obama.

RELATED: President Obama's Post-White House Plan: A Trip to Palm Springs!

The 55-year-old former president went for an ultra-casual look, trading in his signature suit and tie for shorts and flip flops, as he and the former first lady waved at a nearby crowd.

READ: President Barack Obama Shares Sweet Birthday Message to Michelle Obama

Obamas backwards hat was the talk of Twitter, with one tweet reading, "Obama got his hat to the back like it's 1990 and trump isn't president. GET YO A** BACK HERE... with respect, sir."

Other tweets focused on the joy of seeing the former POTUS happily enjoying his vacation after eight years in the White House.

"Seeing Obama on vacation in flip flops with his hat to the back just brought me so much joy," tweeted one user.

"Obama in a backwards hat is my favorite Obama," read another tweet.

WATCH: President Obama Thanks Americans in Parting Letter: 'You Have Made Me a Better Man'

While the ex-POTUS has been soaking up the sun since leaving Washington D.C. last month, hes still being praised for his work in the White House.

Chicago native Chance the Rapper took to Twitter on Thursday to announce the launch of his Thank U Obama clothing line in honor of the 44th president.

MORE: Ellen DeGeneres Shares Touching Tribute Montage to the Obama Family

The Obamas jetted off on vacation after President Donald Trump's inauguration last month.

See the couple's final day in the White House below.

Follow this link:
Barack Obama Rocks His Hat Backwards While Vacationing in the British Virgin Islands - Entertainment Tonight

This Obama-Themed Clothing Line Just Dropped Into Your Life – Huffington Post

There has been no shortage of tributes to President Obama and first lady Michelle in the months since the 2016 election. But none have been quite as cool as this clothing collection by designer Joe Freshgoods, which launched on January 20.

If you, like us, missed the first release of Thank You Obama, a collection of T-shirts, posters and sweatshirts all dedicated to the Obama family, all of that changed whenChance the Rappertweeted photos of himself wearing the restocked goods on Thursday.

Im a model now. droppin in like 15 minutes. ThankUObama.us, he captioned the group of images. Hes seen wearing a T-shirt featuring Obama in a crown, an airbrushed Barack and Michelle wedding T-shirt that looks like it came from the coolest amusement part of all time and oh, right ...

A T-shirt that has the name Malia emblazoned across it. Said T-shirt, called a message to Malia, also says, We all smoke, its OK. The design and color appear to be an homage to Harvard, where Malia will study after a gap year.

Thank You Obama/Joe Freshgoods

On the Thank You Obama website, Freshgoods explained the inspiration for this extremely important project. The night Obama won his first term gave me so much hope, especially and most importantly as a black man. I decided to make a collection saying thank you and give me something to smile at every now and then when i look in the closet, he wrote.

According to Casual Fridays, the line sold out quickly when it first dropped, and this restock is already on a 1- to 2-week backorder, so youd better move fast if you want to score some of this iconic memorabilia.

Thank you,Chance the Rapper. Thank you, Obama. And thank you, Thank You Obama.

Head to Thank You Obama to learn more.

Continue reading here:
This Obama-Themed Clothing Line Just Dropped Into Your Life - Huffington Post

Barack Obama Radically Expanded Our Appreciation of African-American History – The Nation.

By preserving sites that have been central to the black experience, Obama helped revitalize our civic religion.

Barack Obama speaking at the Smithsonians National Museum of African American History and Culture on September 24, 2016. (Reuters / Joshua Roberts)

Among its other accomplishments, the presidency of Barack Obamayou do remember it?featured an unmistakable expansion of public appreciation for African-American history. This was especially true as his time remaining in the White House dwindled away: From the opening of the Smithsonians Museum of African-American History and Cultureto the designation of a site in South Carolina as the nations first national park devoted to Reconstruction, the Obama presidency ended with considerable emphasis on how the nation conceives of African-American history in public spaces. In many ways, and despite whatever uncertainties lie ahead, Obamas attempts to memorialize more of the African-American experience enhanced the meaning of what it means to be an American.

The idea that the United States has a civil religion, an argument first put forward by sociologist Robert Bellah in 1967, suggests that all Americans possess certain national touchstones for collective memory. We have a shared understanding of the importance of certain events, such as the battles of the American Revolution and the Civil War. This is crafted by public memoryhistory not necessarily as it is written by historians, but more generally, the ways in which the public remembers the past in popular culture and media. During Obamas presidency, Americas civil religion expanded to include moments from the civil-rights struggle and other protest movements, all of which enhanced and enlarged the definition of who counts as an American. In a rapidly diversifying country, the importance of this achievement cannot be underestimated.

From his early entry into public discourse, which can be traced to the publication of his memoir, Dreams From My Father, Obama has written and spoken extensively of the importance of African-American historyboth to himself and to the nation. Indeed, Obama wrote in that book about the importance writers such as James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison, and Malcolm X had on the development of his own identity. As president, Obama continued his engagement with the black historical and literary tradition by using the power of the presidency to create landmarks to the African-American experience, thereby forever shaping public memory and Americas civic religion.

His second inaugural address, in 2013, for example, argued for the need to memorialize moments in African-American history as part of a larger national narrative. His famous line about Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall was an attempt to broaden the idea of who is remembered in American memory. In both the realm of presidential rhetoric and physical spaces, Obama worked time and again to broaden the ideas of what is memorialized, of who counts as an American.

His participation at the commemoration of the 50thanniversary of the Selma voting-rights march is another example of how the president used the power of the presidency to memorialize a national event. It would be easy to assume that anyone occupying the White House in 2015 would have participated in the Selma march. However, the symbolism of the first African-American president speaking to the power of the ballotespecially during a time of renewed voter suppression across the nationcould not be missed. In his speech, the president compared the site of Selma to other important places in American history: As John [Lewis] noted, there are places and moments in America where this nations destiny has been decided. Many are sites of warConcord and Lexington, Appomattox. Gettysburg. Others are sites that symbolize the daring of Americas characterIndependence Hall and Seneca Falls, Kitty Hawk and Cape Canaveral.

Obama positioned the civil-rights movement within the highest pantheon of moments in Americas history.

By comparing Selma to other important battles and turning-points in American history, Obama positioned the civil-rights movement within the highest pantheon of moments in Americas political and cultural history. Presidents, through public addresses and what they choose to memorialize, determine what future generations will also consider to be significant in the national story. Just as importantly, they choose the reasons why such moments deserve memorialization. This also matters. Think about President Ronald Reagans reluctance to support a holiday commemorating the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. When Reagan was finally compelled to sign the bill into law in 1983after pressure from both civil-rights activists and Congresshe repackaged King as a color-blind, centrist hero. Even though Kings birthday is now a federal holiday, Americans are still debating the legacy of Dr. King, thanks to Reagans attempt to appropriate him for the conservative cause.

Remember, too, who Obama memorialized in his Selma addressnot just Martin Luther King Jr. but also local activists like Amelia Boynton and C.T. Vivian, thus tying together the local and national civil-rights campaign as is not often done in important, nationally-televised speeches that help shape public memory. In that same address, Obama even spoke to how the activists were seen at that time: Back then, they were called Communists, or half-breeds, or outside agitators, sexual and moral degenerates, and worse. His purpose was to remind Americans of the dangers of labeling anyone who dissents from the status quo as being so far outside the mainstream as to be alien to the American experience. (It was also, significantly, a rhetorical shot at Reagans attempt to redefine Kings legacy; one of the former presidents reasons for originally refusing to support the MLK holiday was his view that King had been a Communist stooge.)

The stakes are higher now than ever. Get The Nation in your inbox.

Obamas efforts to reshape American memory only accelerated in his final year in office. The opening of the National Museum of African-American History and Culture in September 2016 was another occasion for Obama to memorialize African-American history as part of a larger American story of struggle and progress. The museum was created in 2003, long before Obama became president or even emerged on the national stage. But the opportunity of the its actual opening lent itself to Obamas mission of commemorating African-American history as fundamental to the broader American story. As he argued during his speech, too often, we ignored or forgot the stories of millions upon millions of others, who built this nation just as surely, whose humble eloquence, whose calloused hands, whose steady drive helped to create cities, erect industries, build the arsenals of democracy.

These were encouraging and affirming words not just for African Americans, but for those historians of the American experience who have argued over the last 50 years for a shift towards looking at the lives and aspirations of downtrodden Americans, and not just those great men in power. Obamas own speeches and rhetorical gestures, therefore, speak to a larger shift in how American public memory is being recorded, stored, and used.

Obamas own speeches and rhetorical gestures speak to a shift in American public memory.

Obamas decision to grant national-monument status to a Reconstruction historic site in Beaufort, South Carolina, was another example of the presidents attempt to broaden what is memorialized in the United States. By establishing this national monument, the president corrected a previously grievous oversight by the national governmentuntil then, there had been no national monument dedicated to the Reconstruction period. This is not a surprise. The Reconstruction era, long depicted through a racist and simplistic historical lens as a disaster in American history, has undergone a re-evaluation in the last fifty years among mainstream historians (and far longer on the left, going back to W.E.B. Du Boiss Black Reconstruction, published in 1935). But for far too long, Americans appeared unwilling to commemorate Reconstruction as an important moment in American history. This was due to the eras complicated racial and sectional politics, offering both an inspiring story of newly freed African Americans becoming citizens and the depressing end to that experiment only a decade after their freedom. Reconstruction has always resisted the easy American historical narrative of steady and inevitable progress.

Along with providing for the creation of a Reconstruction historic site, Obamas proclamation last month also designated historic sites for the Birmingham civil-rights campaign of the early 1960s, along with ones that tell the story of the Freedom Riders of 1961. Both these sites commemorate not just the victories of the civil-rights movement but some of the worst violence from that time period targeted against civil-rights activists. Again, Obamas designations show that he is concerned not only with remembering American history as one of constant progress, but also one of struggle andin the case of Reconstructionwith the potential for devastating reversals.

Memory of the past matters. If Americans have a collective memory of the past that promotes activism and political participation, it has the potential to push modern and future activists to also imagine a better nationjust as freedmen and women did during Reconstruction, or activists in Selma and Birmingham a century later.

The fight to reshape American memory of the past is one that must be joined by common citizens, politicians, and academics. The battle over the creation of a Reconstruction memorial site was led by historians themselvesmost notably Greg Downs, Kate Masur, and Eric Foner. Local activists have often fought for new ways to commemorate civil-rights struggles. Everyone has a role to play in continuing Obamas efforts to expand the public memory and revitalize the civic religion into one that represents all Americans. We need it now as much as ever.

Read the original post:
Barack Obama Radically Expanded Our Appreciation of African-American History - The Nation.

The Obama-Trump Truce Is Already Over – The Atlantic

It took George W. Bush and Barack Obama a while to warm up to each other. They had many differencesin party, in age, in temperament, in style. Obama had risen to the presidency in part by peddling a harsh critique of Bushs administration. The relationship grew gradually over time. The two men joked at the unveiling of Bushs White House portrait in 2012. Bush invited Obama to the opening of his presidential library. By the time Michelle Obama and the former president embraced at the opening of the National Museum of African American History, stories emerged about the odd friendship between the couples.

The Feedback Loop of Doom for Democratic Norms

That growing warmth was fostered in part by a detente between the two men. While Obama fired broadsides against Bush on the campaign trail, Bush mostly shrugged it off. He instructed Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to keep Obama briefed on responses to the economic crisis, Jonathan Alter reported, with Paulson deeming Obama far more informed about the economy than John McCain. During the transition process, Bush invited Obama and his national-security appointees to war games.

After Obamas inauguration, Bush quietly left the scene and mostly avoided talking about politics. He repeatedly stressed the importance of allowing Obama to govern without the interference of an ex-president. The silence was so striking that when reports surfaced in April 2015, seven years into Obamas presidency, that Bush had privately criticized Obamas ISIS policy, it was headline news. Just as notably, former Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer disputed the reports. He never mentioned Obama. He gave direct, blunt answers to the hottest topics of the day involving politics of the Middle East, Fleischer told CNN.

Obama, in turn, responded to Bushs withdrawal using the same methodhe seldom mentioned Bushs name. As conservatives did not fail to point out, whenever Obama was confronted with his administrations struggles to get the economy rolling, he complained that he had been handed an extremely poor economy. But he usually avoided saying just who he had inherited that economy from. It was a small courtesy for the former president, and a token of Obamas gratitude for Bushs graciousness. Former Obama Chief of Staff Bill Daley told The Washington Post that Obama didnt mention Bush much in private, either, though some of his staffers grumbled about the former president. (Many of Bushs aides still found Obamas criticisms of their old boss unfair and distasteful.)

The public truce between Obama and Bush was notable because of the harsh tone of the 2008 campaign, but it followed the pattern set by previous commanders in chief: The outgoing president would stay out of the way and the incoming president would avoid attacking him. Despite Barack Obamas attempts to build a rapport with Donald Trump during the presidential transition, and despite Trumps public gratitude, the tradition seems moribund now.

Obama had already declared his intention to deviate from tradition if there are issues that have less to do with the specifics of some legislative proposal or battle, but go to core questions about our values and our ideals. He has already broken his silence once, with a spokesman issuing a statement on protests last weekend over Trumps immigration executive order. President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country, the statement said, calling the demonstrations exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake.

But if Obama is willing to fire a broadside at his successor,Trumps administration has shown its willingness to attack Obama in terms that are equally harsh, or even harsher. In a statement on Wednesday about Iran conducting a ballistic-missile test, National Security Adviser Michael Flynn spent nearly as much ink blasting Obamas policies as he did the Iranians:

The Obama Administration failed to respond adequately to Tehran's malign actionsincluding weapons transfers, support for terrorism, and other violations of international norms. The Trump Administration condemns such actions by Iran that undermine security, prosperity, and stability throughout and beyond the Middle East and place American lives at risk. President Trump has severely criticized the various agreements reached between Iran and the Obama Administration, as well as the United Nationsas being weak and ineffective.

On Thursday, Press Secretary Sean Spicer also opened up on Obama. Spicer was being quizzed about a phone call between Trump and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, which reportedly ended acrimoniously in part due to differences over an agreement by the Obama administration to accept 1,250 refugees from Australia.

The president is unbelievably disappointed in the previous administrations deal that was made and how poorly it was crafted, and the threat to national security it put the United States on, Spicer said, a statement remarkable not only for its directness but for the accusation that Obama had endangered American security.

A showdown between presidents is unpredictable because its so rare. But Obama might feel emboldened by his public standing. He has a hefty advantage in approval ratingshe left office with a 59 percent approval rate, according to Gallup, against Trumps current 45 percent. (Incidentally, he also had the upper hand when he entered office, with two-thirds of Americans approving of his performance against just 34 percent approval for Bush, which might have encouraged Bush to stay mum.)

Nonetheless, these are likely only the opening skirmishes of a longer campaign of sniping between Obama and Trump. Trumps agenda is full of just the kinds of items that Obama said would force him to speak up. The tone of Flynns attack on Obama startled White House reporters, who asked Spicer on Wednesday whether to expect more like that. Yes, came the answer.

I think in areas where there's going to be a sharp difference, in particular national security, in contrasting the policies that this president is seeking to make the country safer, stronger, more prosperous, he's going to draw those distinctions and contrast out, Spicer said. And so he's going to continue to make sure that the American people know that some of these deals and things that were left by the previous administration, that he wants to make very clear what his position is and his opposition to them. And the action and the notice that he put Iran on today is something that is important, because I think the American people voted on change.

One change they voted on, whether they realized it or not, was the end of the tradition of comity between former and current presidents.

See more here:
The Obama-Trump Truce Is Already Over - The Atlantic