Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Floyd Mayweather Says Barack Obama May Attend Conor McGregor Fight – Bleacher Report

Floyd Mayweather Jr. has said former President of the United States Barack Obama could attend his August 26 fight against Conor McGregor.

In an interview with TMZ on the press tour ahead of their bout next month, Mayweather spoke highly of the audience he's expecting the matchup to attract, which included more than one presidential alumni:

He said:"Barack Obama may be there. Donald Trump may be there. I'm pretty sure it's gonna be a star-studded event."

UFC President Dana Whiterecently indicatedincumbent U.S. President Trump could be on the guest list for the megafight and was "100 per cent interested" but added he may not attend as he "feels like he ruins events":

The level of security required for the boxing bout is already likely to be rigorous, but any amount of red tape would be increased substantially if a presidenteither current or formerwas part of proceedings.

Mayweather attended Trump's inauguration in January, perHayley MillerofHuffington Post,but it seems unlikely the leader of the free world will repay the favour in Las Vegas next month.

The fight between McGregor and Mayweather is likely to attract many celebrities.

It would almost require a president's salary to afford entry, too, considering ringside tickets are selling for $10,000 (7,700)at the T-Mobile Arena, perMMA Junkie.

Obama and his family have been granted more freedom in his personal life since leaving the Oval Office, and the 44th President of the United States could feature among what will inevitably be a who's who of the world's biggest names,according to Mayweather.

Go here to see the original:
Floyd Mayweather Says Barack Obama May Attend Conor McGregor Fight - Bleacher Report

Obama, Clinton return to political fray but can they help Dems? – Fox News

As Democrats move to regroup after last year's bruising election, the party's biggest heavyweights former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have made clear they're not going anywhere.

The former commander-in-chief was returning to the political fray Thursday evening, headlining aprivate fundraiser for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee in Washington, D.C.

The group is led by his former attorney general Eric Holder and aimed at tackling "unfair" gerrymandering.

"Restoring fairness to our democracy by advocating for fairer, more inclusive district maps around the country is a priority for President Obama," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said Wednesday.

Before he left the White House, Obama said redistricting would be a top political priority in his post-presidency and admitted he failed to create a sustaining organization around the political coalition that twice elected him to office.

But the appearance could signal the latest step in a gradual return to political life, at a time when his party could use the boost.

The GOP raised nearly $10.9 million in May more than twice the amount collected by Democrats. Not only are Democrats low on cash, they have struggled in a series of congressional special elections this year.

As a private citizen, Obama mostly has worked on causes related to his foundation and future presidential library, avoidingD.C. politics or mentioning President Trump by name. But that could be changing, as he has blasted congressional Republicans attempts to repeal and replace his signature health care legislation.

Clinton, too, is returning to the spotlight by launching a PAC aimed at helping congressional Democratic candidates in the upcoming midterms.

Former California Rep. Ellen Tauscher and aide Kate Merrill also have started a super PAC focused on seven districts in the Golden State that voted for Clinton but ended up voting for a GOP candidate in the House.

Some, though, have questioned whether the two-time failed presidential candidate, who recently slammed the DNC, should have such a starring role.

In May, the former Democratic presidential nominee directed criticism at the DNC and said she inherited nothing from the Democratic Party.

It was bankrupt, it was on the verge of insolvency, its data was mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong. I had to inject money into it the DNC to keep it going, Clinton said during a question and answer session at Recodes Code Conference in California.

Democrats, it seems, are still mapping out a game plan for 2018.

The party suffered losses in several House special elections this year, reigniting the debate as to whether the current leaders have what it takes to put Democrats back in power.

Particularly painful was Jon Ossoffs 3-percentage-point loss in Georgias 6th Congressional District. More than $23 million was raised across the country in the contest that was billed as a referendum on Trump.

Following the Georgia fail, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., faced renewed calls from party colleagues for her removal from leadership. She also had been linked to Ossoff in multiple Republican ads in the race. But Pelosi continues to hold on, as Clinton and Obama return to the political stage.

Garry Mauro, a strategist who led former President Bill Clintons 1992 campaign effort in Texas, told The Daily Caller that while Hillary Clinton would be well received, it would be ill-advised for her to play the dominant role.

Were not going to win these races because Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi comes to the state and campaigns, he said. Were going to win it because we represent new leadership and new ideas.

Rep. Seth Moulton, Democrat of Massachusetts, agrees. Moulton has been one of many who have been calling for new leadership.

We're at the worst electoral position that the Democratic Party has been in in decades, he said in an NPR interview. And so when you keep losing like that, you can't keep doing the same old thing.

One up-and-comer is California Sen. Kamala Harris, whose national presence got a boost after Obama told a group of Democrats in 2013 that in addition to being brilliant and tough, Harris was by far, the best-looking attorney general in the country.

Obama later apologized for the comment.

Since then, Harris, in her freshman term, has been dogged in her criticism of the Trump administration. She has voted against 18 of Trumps nominees and has been described as fearless.

But pinning the hopes of the Democratic Party on her shoulders might be a bit premature.

She just got here, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, said when asked about Harris political future as a national figure. What she should do is concentrate on being a good, and possibly a great, United States senator. The rest will either happen or not happen.

Fox News' Mike Emanuel contributed to this report.

Read this article:
Obama, Clinton return to political fray but can they help Dems? - Fox News

Michelle Obama wins the night at the ESPYs – Washington Post

The ESPYs are all about celebrating the biggest and boldest names in sports but at Wednesdays award show, it was former first lady Michelle Obama who took home the prize for loudest applauseof the night.

The audience at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles rose to a standing ovation when Obama took the stage to posthumously present Special Olympics founder Eunice Kennedy Shriver with the Arthur Ashe Award for Courage.

Obama gave a heartfelt speech praising Shriverslifelong work on behalf of people with disabilities.

[ESPYs to honor Special Olympics founder Eunice Kennedy Shriver with posthumous courage award]

I am here tonight to honor a remarkable woman, a woman who believed that everyone has something to contribute and everyone deserves the chance to push themselves, to find out what theyre made of, and to compete and win, Obama told the crowd. Through her passionate service, she made the world more welcoming and fair.

Shriver, who died in 2009, was inspired by her sister Rosemary, who was born with intellectual disabilities but loved to play sports with her athletic siblings. In 1962, Shriver created Camp Shriver, a day camp for children with intellectual disabilities hosted in her familys back yard. Six years later, her effort evolved into the first International Special Olympics Games in Chicago.

The former first lady, clad in a striking black dress, was joined onstage by eight Special Olympics athletes as well as Shrivers son Tim Shriver, who accepted the award on his mothers behalf.

[Michelle Obama continues her speaking tour with appearance at womens conference]

Once a great first lady, still a great first lady, he said of Obama, and the crowd cheered its approval. He added that his mother would have been touched by Obamas presence at the ceremony: She would have been so honored that you are here for her tonight, as we all are.

Read the original post:
Michelle Obama wins the night at the ESPYs - Washington Post

Obama-appointed ‘ethics’ officer resigns – good riddance – Fox News

When a partisan member of the bureaucratic swamp resigns, thats something to cheer about. And huzzahs were certainly in order last week when the nations top ethics officer, Walter Shaub, announced that he is resigning, effective July 19.

Barack Obama appointed Shaub to head the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) back in 2013. Its a five-year appointment, so Shaubs resignation merely ends his reign six months early.

Shaub has already lined up a new gig. He is headed to the Campaign Legal Center, a partisan, Soros-funded advocacy group that has been working for years to restrict your First Amendment right to speak and engage in political activity. That tells you a lot about Shaubs politics and why his resignation is cause for celebration.

His old sinecure, the Office of Government Ethics, was established by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. Its function is to oversee the ethics rules governing federal employees, including the public disclosure process that requires high-level civil servants to disclose their financial holdings. Given the enormous effect that charges of unethical conduct can have, it is critical that this agency have a head who is ethical, highly professional, and unwilling to use his power in a partisan manner.

Shaub fell far short of that mark. After Donald Trump became president, he directed his staff to use the official OGE twitter account to send out a series of mocking tweets about the president. The tweets were designed to pressure Mr. Trump into jettisoning all of his business interestsdespite the fact that no federal law or ethics rule requires divestment.

Unsurprisingly, the OGE under Shaub has treated many of President Trumps nominees and potential nominees shabbily, too. Clearly, the agency is doing everything it can to slow down the clearance process.

One tweet promised that OGE would sing your praises if you divested. It is not OGEs job to praise or criticize anyone. Its sole job is to determine what ethics rules apply to government employees and to advise them accordingly. As its website says, its mission is prevention; it does not adjudicate complaints or prosecute ethics violations.

The head of OGE is not a superhero. He doesnt have the power to impose drastic requirements, such as complete divestiture, that have never been authorized by Congress.

It was unethical of Shaub to publicly air his erroneous opinion that the president and his transition team needed to jettison their business holdings. No ethics agency can operate if those it is meant to advise have no assurance that their requests for guidance will be kept confidential.

Not only was Shaub unapologetic about abusing his authority in an attempt to publicly embarrass the president into complying with a nonexistent ethics requirement, he went so far as to criticize the president for declining to release his tax returns. Again, there is no federal law requiring such disclosure. As the head of an agency charged with implementing existing ethics law, Shaub had no business publicly commenting on the presidents decision.

Unsurprisingly, the OGE under Shaub has treated many of President Trumps nominees and potential nominees shabbily, too.

Several individuals going through the approval process with OGE have told me that the agency has been raising bogus ethics and conflict of interest claims when no conflict exists and no federal ethics law or regulation supports the claims and demands being made by OGE. Clearly, the agency is doing everything it can to slow down the clearance process.

Fittingly, Shaub may have committed an actual ethics violation in terminating his employment: 5 CFR 2635.702(c) specifically prohibits government officials from endorsing any product, service or enterpriseincluding nonprofit organizationsand persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment. Shaub submitted his resignation letter on July 6 with an effective date of July 19. Yet on July 6, his future employer published a press release prominently mentioning Shaubs current and future titles and quoting him as looking forward to improving the OGEs program through his work at the Campaign Legal Center.

Shaubs post-election actions at OGE abused his authority and contributed to the noxious political environment that infests the nations capital. He severely damaged the reputation of the Office of Government Ethics as an unbiased, objective agency that helps government employees comply with federal ethics rules no matter what political party they support.

Now he is shipping off to an advocacy organization that wants to curtail the First Amendment rights of candidates and the general public to speak and work in the political arena. Good riddance.

Hans A. von Spakovsky is a Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation and former Justice Department official. He is coauthor of Whos Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk.

The rest is here:
Obama-appointed 'ethics' officer resigns - good riddance - Fox News

DeVos: Too many college students have been treated unfairly under Obama-era sexual assault policy – Washington Post

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said Thursday that too many students have been treated unfairly as colleges have sought to comply with Obama-era policy on handling sexual assault, but she declined to offer any specifics about how she intends to move forward on one of the more controversial and closely watched issues handled by her agency.

No student should feel like there isnt a way to seek justice, and no student should feel that the scales are tipped against him or her, she told reporters Thursday afternoon, following what she called an emotionally draining series of meetings with college administrators, survivors of assault and students who said they were falsely accused and wrongly disciplined.

The day after her civil rights chief suggested that 90 percent of assault allegations are the result of drunken and regretted sex rather than rape, DeVos sought to show sensitivity to victims, saying that assault allegations should not be swept under the rug and women should not be dismissed.

But she also said she was deeply concerned about addressing the concerns of the accused. Their stories are not often shared, she said.

Advocates for accused students have been pleased to have the ear of the Trump administration, seeing an opening to roll back Obama-era policies that they argue have results in biased campus sexual assault investigations. During the Thursday session devoted to wrongful accusations, about a half-dozen students (including one woman) told their stories, often tearfully, according to Cynthia Garrett, co-president of Families Advocating for Campus Equality, who was in the meeting.

The secretary was extremely attentive to these students, Garrett said. We had young men breaking down telling their stories.

But advocates for survivors of sexual assault have been alarmed by what they view as DeVoss outsized interest in hearing from wrongfully accused students, given that only a small fraction of rape reports are found to be false.

Dozens of survivors and their allies gathered outside the Education Department Thursday to urge DeVos not to roll back federal protections for victims of sexual violence, and to decry what they view as the Trump administrations lack of commitment to enforcing federal civil rights law.

On the concrete plaza outside the agencys D.C. headquarters, activists read the stories of survivors from across the country while DeVos held her meetings inside.

Survivors want to make it very clear that we deserve to be listened to, said Mahroh Jahangiri of the advocacy group Know Your IX, one of the events organizers.

Education Department officials are weighing whether to keep or reject Obama-era guidance that outlined how schools must meet their obligations under Title IX, a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination at federally funded institutions. Critics of that guidance, issued in 2011, said it was an executive overreach that set too low a bar for campus administrators to find a student guilty of sexual assault.

[DeVos considers whether to roll back Obama-era approach to campus sexual assault]

It incentivized these campus panels to err on the side of punishing potentially innocent students, said Christopher Perry of Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE), who met with DeVos Thursday.

Some accused students hope the Trump administration will take a different tack. Joseph Roberts said he was cautiously optimistic that federal officials will care about his story: Roberts said he was falsely accused of sexual harassment and suspended three weeks before he was due to graduate from Savannah State University, an experience that left him hopeless and suicidal. The guidance, he said, definitely needs to be reexamined.

Victims advocates and some lawyers believe that the problem is not with the guidance, but with the way some colleges have interpreted it.

They went overboard in terms of changing their policies, said Naomi Shatz, a Boston lawyer who represents accused students. Shatz said too many schools dont hold hearings and dont give accused students a chance to see the evidence against them approaches that are unfair and not dictated by the guidance.

Several college officials who participated in the meeting said they were grateful to be asked about this issue, as they had not been during the Obama administration.

In 2012 the American Council on Education sent a letter to the departments Office for Civil Rights (OCR) with a number of questions, asking for clarification of the 2011 directive, said Terry Hartle of ACE. The letter has never been answered, he said.

The Obama administration took such an enforcement-centered approach that institutions were reluctant to ask questions of OCR for fear of being flagged for an audit, he said.

Victims rights activists argue that the guidance is firmly rooted in existing law and fear that DeVos intends to jettison the guidance. They said remarks this week by Candice Jackson, the acting head of OCR, seemed to confirm that fear.

Speaking to the New York Times, Jackson argued that college investigations have often been unfair to accused students, in part because of undue pressure from the federal government. She claimed that 90 percent of accusations fall into the category of we were both drunk, we broke up, and six months later I found myself under a Title IX investigation because she just decided that our last sleeping together was not quite right.

Jackson has since apologized for the statement, saying her words poorly characterized the conversations Ive had with advocates. As a survivor of rape myself, I would never seek to diminish anyones experience, she said. All sexual harassment and sexual assault must be taken seriously which has always been my position and will always be the position of this Department.

[Lawyer who highlighted Hillary Clintons role in defending rape suspect tapped for civil rights post]

Jackson apologized again to survivors in the meeting Thursday, according to attendees. Its impossible to take something like that back, said Fatima Goss Graves of the National Womens Law Center, who was in the meeting. But she said the department can show its commitment to protecting students by helping colleges understand how to fairly adjudicate sexual assault allegations, and by conducting a listening tour to hear from survivors around the country.

We cant expect them to go to Washington, D.C., Goss Graves said. The department has to go to them and listen deeply.

DeVos said that while she intends to continue seeking input, she wants to move quickly to make changes.

Thursdays event was one part of a broader effort to mobilize support for maintaining the 2011 Title IX guidance, which victims rights advocates greeted as a step toward ensuring disciplinary consequences for students found to have committed assault. In an op-ed published in Teen Vogue this week, 114 sexual assault survivors called on DeVos to keep the guidance in place.

We cannot imagine a more cruel or misguided policy agenda than one that withdraws protections from vulnerable students especially coming from the administration of a man who has been repeatedly accused of committing sexual violence himself, they wrote.

In a letter to DeVos on Wednesday, Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) urged her to keep the 2011 guidance in place and decried her decision to meet with advocates for the accused, including the National Coalition for Men and Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE), which the Southern Poverty Law Center has called misogynistic. Instead of catering to organizations that want to sweep sexual assaults on college campuses under the rug, the Department of Education should confront this challenge directly by coming to uphold the protections currently in place, Casey wrote.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), who spoke at Thursdays event outside the agency headquarters, said she doesnt want to see an innocent person punished any more than I want to see a guilty person let off the hook. But she said there are still too many victims who are met with blame and retaliation rather than support and protection.

There continues to be heinous injustice across this country, she said.

Susan Svrluga contributed to this report.

Read more:
DeVos: Too many college students have been treated unfairly under Obama-era sexual assault policy - Washington Post