Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Poll: Obama, George W. Bush are popular post-presidency – CBS News

A majority of Americans view both former Presidents Obama and George W. Bush favorably, according to a Gallup survey released Tuesday.

45 Photos

How do the presidents of our era compare with those who came before?

The poll found that 63 percent view Obama favorably and 59 percent view Bush in the same way, with Bush's favorability rating rising 7 percentage points over the last year. Just a few months after he left office in 2009, only 35 percent of the public viewed Bush favorably.

Obama's current rating mirrors the rating Gallup measured for him during the last leg of his presidency -- from November of last year through this past January. The poll found that Obama is viewed favorably among all major demographic groups -- whites, nonwhites, men, women people of all ages.

This comes as President Trump's approval rating takes a dip. A CBS News poll released Tuesday finds that 36 percent of the public approve of his job, down from 41 percent in late April.

The poll surveyed 1,009 adults between June 7 and 11 with a 4 percentage point margin of error.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Visit link:
Poll: Obama, George W. Bush are popular post-presidency - CBS News

Most Americans Still Like Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, Poll Says – TIME

Former President George W. Bush (2-R), his wife Laura (R) stand with President Barack Obama (2-L) and First Lady Michelle Obama (L) as Bush departs from the U.S. Capitol after the inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th president of the U.S. on Jan. 20, 2009 in Washington, DC.PoolGetty Images

More than half of Americans hold favorable views of the United States' previous two presidents, Barack Obama and George W. Bush , according to Gallup .

Fifty-nine percent of Americans saw former President George W. Bush positively in June, a new post-presidential high for the leader whose favorability rating stood at just 35 percent in 2009.

The poll found that 63 percent of Americans felt favorably about former President Obama in June, five months after his farewell address . Americans' feelings differ starkly depending on their party politics, however, as only 22 percent of Republicans felt favorably towards Obama this month compared to 95 percent of Democrats.

The poll surveyed 1,009 adults across the country from June 7 to 11. It has a margin of error of +/- 4%.

Other presidents have seen their favorability ratings climb after vacating their seats behind the Resolute Desk. Former President Bill Clinton had a post-presidential rating of 39 percent in March, 2001, but it rose to 69 percent in 2012, according to Gallup.

President Trump's approval rating was 38% in the most recent Gallup tracking poll .

Read more:
Most Americans Still Like Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, Poll Says - TIME

Shattuck: Differences in Trump, Obama efforts speak for themselves – Boston Herald

President Obama left him there. President Trump got him back. No need to overthink it.

Yes, murderous North Korean thugs killed 22-year-old Otto Warmbier after holding him for 17 months, but the last administration was willfully impotent in dealing with the regime.

Obamas official approach was dubbed strategic patience. It sounds like a term that wins the marketing meeting but has little effect in real life.

Kind of like leading from behind.

In the case of poor Warmbier, it meant that all hope was gone.

His parents were told to sit tight. When Otto was first taken, we were advised by the past administration to take a low profile while they worked to obtain his release, his father told the media. We did so without result.

Warmbiers father learned the hard way that results among progressives are less important than symbolism, intent and high-minded nuance: the kind of thinking that compelled Secretary of State John Kerry to pack up James Taylor and head to France after a 2015 terror attack.

Kerry said it was to share a big hug with Paris.

Unbelievable. There is no greater threat to the innocent than the deranged logic of liberals. It often disguises itself as compassion, usually spoken in a thoughtful tone, lyrically elegant at every turn.

But deadly and destructive and former President Obama was a master.

Those days are over. American voters began to feel rightfully unsafe under an administration that blamed unemployment and climate change for terrorism.

Donald Trumps prescription was less flowery: Bomb the (expletive) out of ISIS.

And so he did.

He also brought Otto Warmbier home by bringing him home. No lofty lectures to the American people. No cute turns of phrase. David Crosby was not mobilized.

Warmbiers family was able to spend a few days with their mortally injured son because there is a pragmatist in the White House.

Warmbiers father said it best: Do I think the past administration could have done more? I think the results speak for themselves.

Lets not ever forget what those villains did to that kid in North Korea and hopefully those responsible can be made to pay for it someday.

Meanwhile, we finally have a president determined to fix whats broken in this country. If his vast establishment opposition can put the interests of the country first, perhaps the results will speak for themselves.

Read the original here:
Shattuck: Differences in Trump, Obama efforts speak for themselves - Boston Herald

A pro-Trump group is using Obama’s voice out of context in radio ad for Georgia’s special election – CNN

Great America Alliance, a pro-Trump non-profit group that previously ran ads attacking former FBI director James Comey during his testimony, is running an ad that quotes Obama narrating his autobiographical book "Dreams From My Father." The ad, however, does not mention that in the selected passage, Obama is actually quoting someone else who is speaking about the black community and Chicago politics before the early 1980s.

The ad begins with narration from conservative activist Autry Pruitt.

"Hi, my name is Autry Pruitt, a fellow black American working hard every day, just like you. It may seem out of season, but all of a sudden, Democratic politicians have started coming around again. We normally only see them every other November, swarming around and making promises to get our vote. But nothing ever changes for us, does it? Here's what President Barack Obama had to say about it."

Then Obama can be heard saying, "Plantation politics. Black people in the worst jobs. The worst housing. Police brutality rampant. But when the so-called black committeemen came around election time, we'd all line up and vote the straight Democratic ticket. Sell our souls for a Christmas turkey."

Pruitt then says, "Let's not sell out for another Christmas turkey. The more things change, the more they stay the same. Democrats keep taking our votes for granted."

In the book, Obama was quoting a barber telling him about the political system in Chicago before the city elected Harold Washington, the city's first black mayor, in 1983. Immediately after the Christmas turkey line in the book, Obama quotes the barber as saying, "White folks spitting in our faces, and we'd reward 'em with the vote."

The ad is running days before the special election in Georgia's 6th congressional district, with Democrat Jon Ossoff and Republican Karen Handel facing off in a tight race to fill the House seat left vacant by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.

Eric Beach, a co-chair of Great America Alliance, said the ad was an attempt to run something "outside the box" and that the group was trying to show "creatively" that Democrats have a history of failed promises.

Asked about the cut line, Beach said, "it's like any ad, those are his words and we want to use his words and I'll leave it at that."

A spokesman for former President Obama did not immediately return a comment request about the ad.

See the article here:
A pro-Trump group is using Obama's voice out of context in radio ad for Georgia's special election - CNN

How Obama Won The French Election – HuffPost

French President Emmanuel Macrons party, La Republique En Marche, won a resounding victory Sunday in the final round of the countrys parliamentary elections, gaining a commanding majorityin the National Assembly.

The victory, which dramatically reshapes French politics, is particularly remarkable given that Macrons party is just a year old and many of its elected representatives are new to government. Macron himself was practically unknown a year ago.But amid a fracturing of support for Frances traditionally powerful parties, En Marche successfully presented itself as a party able to transcendleft-right political divides to bring reform.

En Marche created both a presidential and a parliamentary campaign that mimicked the campaign of then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) in 2008 with young candidates pledging change and a large grassroots movement of volunteers getting out the vote.Behind the scenes, the parallel was even more explicit, as Macron employed a political consulting firm called Liegey Muller Pons to bring U.S.-style voter outreach strategy and data collection methods reminiscent of Obamas 2008 and 2012 campaigns into French politics.

The consulting firms founders, Vincent Pons, Arthur Muller and Guillaume Liegey, met while at Harvard and MIT and had spent time as canvassers for Obamas data-driven ground game. While volunteering and observing how the Obama campaign ran, they began to note its extensive use of data, door-to-door canvassing and recording of information from voters.

Pons, who went door-to-door in New Hampshire in 2012, told HuffPost he was struck by the level of professionalism and technology in Obamas campaign as compared to French elections. Pons, Liegey and Muller focused their firm on taking some of the methods theyd witnessed in the U.S. and bringing them back to France.

JEFF PACHOUD via Getty Images

For Macron, Liegey Muller Pons developed an algorithm based on census data and past election results to help En Marche pinpoint neighborhoods in France that were indicative of the country as a whole. Macrons party then sent tens of thousands of volunteers to speak with potential voters in those areas during 2016, and used these visits as a kind of mass focus group to determine what issues the electorate cared about.

The effort was not meant to persuade and mobilize voters to support [Macron], Pons, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School, told HuffPost. The intention was instead to have a discussion with voters and bridge the gap between politics and voters.

En Marche recorded tens of thousands of conversations, using the resulting data to craft Macrons policy platform and communications strategy. It also planted an early seed in key neighborhoods and helped build a base of volunteers and staff that it could use in its official election campaign this year. Liegey Muller Pons provided analysis on this data to further inform the campaigns strategy.

Pons believes that the process of canvassing and voter engagement outside of the election cycle something not previously done in France allowed Macron to reach disillusioned citizens who would have otherwise ignored last-minute appeals to vote. It also created an image of a party willing to hear the grievances of voters, even before they were formally asking for a vote in return.

En Marche and Macron ran on a platform that combined centrist, pro-European Union policies with promises of reform and a change from establishment parties. Unlike the more radical campaigns run by the far-left and far-right candidates, which attracted a high percentage of the youth vote, En Marche received an almost even distribution of voters across age demographics. The party did especially well in major cities and with educated voters.

The success of En Marche shows that you can also provide a powerful answer by having someone who has reasonable ideas, progressive ideas, but who brings a change simply because he doesnt have a large political background and is going to present a number of new faces and new candidates, Pons said.

Bertrand Guay / POOL New / Reuters

Macron, a banker and former Socialist minister, came from relative obscurity to upend French politics, defeating established party candidates and far-right leader Marine Le Pen to win the presidency last month.But even after his win, Macron still needed a parliamentary majority in order to avoid a gridlocked government and a diminished presidency.

En Marche fielded more than 14,000 applications from people seeking to run for Parliament. Around half of the partys 526 candidates are new to politics, and 266 of them are women.La Republique En Marche candidates ended up easily securing a majority on Sunday, as projections showed the party and its centrist ally the MoDems on pace to secure at least 355 seats out of the chambers 577.

Even as low voter turnout in parliamentary elections took some sheen off the strong showing, the results still suggest that Macrons party will have the numbers to enact the wide-ranging reforms promised during the campaign.

But public backlash to some of Macrons pro-business reforms is likely, and the low turnout is not a good sign for French enthusiasm toward its current politics. Frances powerful trade unions have in the past rallied millions of people to the streets over proposed policy changes, and the unions have cautioned Macron against pushing through labor reforms too swiftly.

Wake up to the day's most important news.

Follow this link:
How Obama Won The French Election - HuffPost