Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Catching Up With Progressives, Biden to Provide N95s Nationwide – Common Dreams

Eighteen months after Sen. Bernie Sanders first introduced legislation to ensure everyone in the U.S. would receive face masks to protect against Covid-19, the White House on Wednesday followed public health guidance by announcing it will make N95s available for free nationwide.

"It's starting to work. Demand more. Demand better."

Drawing from the Strategic National Stockpile, which now has 737 million domestically-manufactured N95 masks after shortages at the beginning of the pandemic, the Biden administration will supply 400 million of the nonsurgical respirators to pharmacies and community health centers across the country later this week. The White House is calling the plan the "largest deployment of personal protective equipment in U.S. history."

The N95s, which can filter out 95% of airborne particles when used correctly, will be available by the end of next week, according to the New York Times.

Sanders praised the White House for heeding warnings that cloth masks may not provide sufficient protection against the Omicron variant, calling the move "a good first step."

According to NBC News, there has been division in the administration regarding how far officials should go in urging Americans to use the respirators.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky only recently updated the agency's guidance regarding the superior effectiveness of N95s versus cloth masks, and warned in recent days that people who don't like the fit of the respirators may stop masking altogether.

Sanders, who reintroduced his Masks for All Act last week, vehemently disagreed with Walensky on CNN, sending what Dr. Abraar Karan, an infectious disease doctor at Stanford University, called "a clear, concise message" about upgrading masks.

The Biden administration's deployment of N95s comes as Covid-19 cases have been rising for several weeks, driven by the Omicron variant. The seven-day average for daily new cases reached 1,700 on Monday and modelers say between 50,000 and 300,000 Americans could die of Covid-19 before the wave is expected to end in mid-March.

But Karan rejected the notion that the N95s are reaching Americans too late to make a difference in public health outcomes, especially considering warnings from experts that continued vaccine apartheid is likely to result in new variants cropping up around the world and causing new surges in the United States.

"If you think we'll never need masks again, I'd say that prediction hasn't worked out too well," said Karan.

As the administration announced the distribution of N95s, officials also launched a website where Americans can order four free rapid Covid-19 tests per household. That program follows an overhaul of the White House's strategy regarding testing after Press Secretary Jen Psaki was widely denounced for openly mocking a reporter's suggestion that the U.S. government could and should provide tests to all Americans.

Two weeks after Psaki suggested the proposal was unrealistic, the White House responded to pressure from public health experts and political observers by announcing it would make 500 million tests free to the public.

Dr. Rick Bright, an immunologist who issued early warnings about the Covid-19 pandemic to the Trump administration in January 2020, said the White House's recent policy shifts regarding masks and tests are a sign that Americans and public health experts should "demand more" and "demand better" from the federal government.

After the recent successes, Bright asked, "can we upgrade ventilation and air filtration in schools, businesses, and transportation?"

Continued here:
Catching Up With Progressives, Biden to Provide N95s Nationwide - Common Dreams

Maine lawmaker hailed as example for rural progressives won’t seek reelection in 2022 – Bangor Daily News

A Nobleboro state senator whose win over the Maine Senates top Republican in 2020 was held up as an example for rural progressives is not seeking a second term this fall, setting up another battleground race in Lincoln County.

Sen. Chloe Maxmin, a 29-year-old Democrat, announced last Wednesdaythat she decided not to run again in order to attend the University of Maine School of Law. She cited the demands of legislative life in a statement, saying she planned to start a nonprofit with her campaign manager about grassroots organizing, a topic the two are also releasing a bookabout.

Maxmins win over then-SenateMinority Leader Dana Dow, R-Waldoboro, was one of the more notable upsetsof 2020. It came after Democrats spent heavily on the race in the district encompassing all of Lincoln County, plus Washington and Windsor. She was a freshman state representative at that time after winning a district previously held by a Republican.

It led to her gaining a national profile as an example of a progressive that could win in more conservative and rural districts. Lincoln County only partially fits that bill as a swing county easily won by President Joe Biden by 10 percentage points in 2020, while Republican U.S. Sen. Susan Collins took it by 8 points the same year.

Everything is really divisive right now, and the need for community-based organizing is more important than ever, Maxmin said, adding that Democrats will need to listen to voters of all affiliations and backgrounds in the rural district if they wish to hold the seat.

Her decision not to run will ensure the 2022 election will again be one to watch. Competition is already ramping up for the seat. Former Republican state Rep. Abden Simmons of Waldoboro registered for the seat in December. He won a single term representing House District 91 in 2016 before losing to Rep. Jeffrey Evangelos, I-Friendship, in 2018.

Two Democrats have registered for the seat. Maxmin has endorsed Round Pond school counselor and educator Cameron Reny, while Damariscotta lawyer David Levesque also filed to run for the seat last week.

Reny, whose husband co-owns the Renys store chain, already appears to have the backing of the Maine Senate Democrats. Her announcementwas made alongside Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, Senate Majority Leader Eloise Vitelli, D-Arrowsic, as well as Maxmin.

More articles from the BDN

Continue reading here:
Maine lawmaker hailed as example for rural progressives won't seek reelection in 2022 - Bangor Daily News

Progressive Stalwart Vincent Fort To Take On Georgia Rep. David Scott – HuffPost

Vincent Fort, an outspoken Atlanta progressive and former Georgia state Senate whip, announced plans Thursday to challenge Rep. David Scott, a 10-term centrist Democrat, in Georgias June primary elections.

Given Forts close relationship with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and deep ties to the Atlanta-area left, his entry into the race raises the prospect of a primary challenge that attracts national attention and resources.

Its time for a change. We need somebody in place who is prepared and able to fight for a progressive agenda, Fort told HuffPost. We need someone who puts people in this district first.

Scott, a member of the centrist Blue Dog Coalition who chairs the House Committee on Agriculture, has taken some votes that have elicited criticism from progressives. A recipient of copious corporate PAC contributions, Scott voted for the 2005 law making it harder for households to declare bankruptcy, and for a 2018 bill rolling back some of the Wall Street regulations that former President Barack Obama signed into law.

Scotts colleagues on the House Committee on Agriculture have also raised concerns about whether Scott, 76, is in good enough physical and mental shape to adequately discharge his duties as chairman, according to a Politico report. Scott has rejected doubts about his capacities, attributing temporary mobility challenges to a recent leg surgery.

Fort, 65, represented southwest Atlanta in the Georgia state Senate for two decades, reaching the No. 2 position of Democratic whip. During the last period of Democratic control in the state legislature, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Fort shepherded the passage of pioneering laws restricting predatory lending and enhancing punishments for the commission of hate crimes.

We need someone who is going to stand up for hardworking people as opposed to predatory lending companies, Fort told HuffPost.

Fort does not currently live in Georgias solidly Democratic 13th Congressional District, which includes part of the city of Atlanta and suburbs with a large Black population. He plans to move there as soon as possible and said that his tenure as a state senator for some of the district has given him insight into the needs of his would-be constituents. He suggested that he would be more available to constituents than Scott, who also does not live in the district.

Not only am I right on the issues, but I also am present and have always been present, he said. I have a reputation of being in the district, amongst the voters and constituents. I wont be missing in action.

An inside player in the state Capitol, Fort is also known as an independent-minded populist with one foot in the activist world. He was an early supporter of both the Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter movements who frequently intervened personally on behalf of constituents facing eviction or foreclosure.

During the 2016 presidential primary, Fort, who initially backed Hillary Clinton, ended up embracing Sanders candidacy, declaring that Sanders was speaking to the issues that are the most critical to Forts constituents. Fort went on to become a co-chair of Sanders campaign in the state.

Sanders returned the favor in 2017 when Fort launched an ill-fated bid for mayor of Atlanta; he came in fifth place. Fort currently earns a living lobbying for, and advising, labor unions at the state Capitol.

If elected, Fort would mark a dramatic leftward shift in representation for Georgias 13th Congressional District, which includes part of the city of Atlanta and suburbs with a large Black population. He is a supporter of Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, tuition-free public college, student debt cancellation, and federal rules to reduce police misconduct. He stops short of endorsing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel, and demurs when asked about calls to reduce police funding, noting that he has stood both with families who have lost loved ones to police violence and those who have lost loved ones to civilian gun violence.

When I am in the community, I hear two things from the Miss Marys: One, we need to be safe. And two, we need to give the kids something to do, he said. More resources need to be put into making sure that there are alternative approaches to putting people in jail.

Fort, who is refusing to accept corporate PAC contributions, begins his campaign with the endorsement of Atlanta City Councilman Antonio Lewis, a progressive who unseated a more moderate incumbent in the citys 2021 municipal elections.

Fort faces obstacles on the road to defeating Scott in Georgias June 21 primary, however. He does not yet have the support of any progressive groups that normally help primary challengers fundraise, and his frosty relationship with Stacey Abrams, the former Georgia state House Democratic leader-turned-gubernatorial candidate and voting rights icon, could prove a hindrance.

And Fort has competition for the progressive mantle in the race. South Fulton, Georgia, City Councilman Mark Baker is also running to unseat Scott on a left-leaning platform. He has the endorsement of South Fulton Mayor khalid kamau, a democratic socialist and Black Lives Matter activist with his own following in Atlanta-area activist circles.

Read more here:
Progressive Stalwart Vincent Fort To Take On Georgia Rep. David Scott - HuffPost

Progressive Allies Need to Call Out Everyday Antisemitism – The Daily Beast

American Jews were reminded once again last weekend that even in one of the safest countries in the world for Jews, they are never truly safe.

A gun-wielding man of British Muslim descent took four worshipers hostage in a synagogue in Colleyville, Texas. After hours of fruitless negotiations, the hostages fled for their lives and the gunman was subsequently killed by an FBI anti-terrorism unit.

As is often the case when high-profile antisemitic attacks occur, American Jews were bombarded by the now familiar thoughts and prayers from political leaders and media figures outraged by the latest manifestation of anti-Jewish hatred.

But such gestures are increasingly falling flat, particularly as more and more American Jewsand Jewish institutionsfind themselves fearful and under assault.

Despite accounting for 2 percent of the US population, Jews are the victims in more than half of all hate crimes. One in four Jews say they have experienced antisemitism in the past year. Wearing a yarmulke in public is becoming an increasingly risky endeavor and an open invitation for ridicule or even assault. Synagogues today in America look more like armed garrisons than open and welcoming places of worship.

This is the new reality for American Jews. And if non-Jews want to truly stand with us, they need to do more than mouth empty platitudes.

For example, Republicans were quick to condemn the attack in Texasand pledge their bona fides in fighting antisemitismbut where was their outrage when just last month former President Donald Trump said Jews used to have absolute power over Congress and that American Jews either dont like Israel or dont care about Israel because they overwhelmingly voted for Barack Obama and Joe Biden?

How many of them have spoken out against the routine and obscene use of Nazi atrocities committed against European Jews as an analogy to mask-wearing and vaccine mandates in the fight against COVID-19?

Truth be told, most American Jews dont have the highest expectations for Republican politicians. The GOP has long used charges of antisemitism as a cudgel for dividing Democrats, all the while looking the other way at anti-Jewish animus in their own ranks.

But its the reaction on the left thats more troubling for Jews, who have long viewed the Democratic Party and progressives as political and cultural allies. Progressives, by and large, are happy to talk about antisemitism when the culprit is a white right-winger. They are far more reticent when anti-Jewish hatred hits closer to home.

As the situation in Colleyville unfolded, some progressive commentators pointed a finger at white supremacists, which is not necessarily surprising. In 2017 neo-Nazis infamously marched in Charlottesville, Virginia, chanting Jews will not replace us. In 2018 a deranged gunman stormed the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh and killed 11 worshipers.

But antisemitism is more than just the oldest prejudiceits also bipartisan and multicultural.

Deeply liberal New York City is host to the majority of antisemitic assaults in the United States, and they are almost never carried out by white nationalists.

In 2018 and 2019, Orthodox Jews in New York were routinely the victims of antisemitic attacks, including slapping, kicking, sucker punches, death threats, menacing, vandalism, and swastika graffiti. According to the NYPDs hate crime stats for 2019 and 2020, more than half of those arrested for anti-Jewish hate crimes were persons of color.

In 2019 two members of the extremist Black Israelite sect took over a Kosher supermarket in Jersey City and killed four people, including a local police detective. Weeks later, a machete-wielding Black man stormed a Hannukah celebration in Monsey, New York, killing one person. And then last May, Jews were attacked on the streets of Los Angeles, New York City, and a host of other major American cities by pro-Palestinian demonstrators. In Bal Harbour, Florida, four men surrounded a Jewish family and yelled Die Jew at a man in a yarmulke before threatening to rape his wife and daughter.

On college campuses, virulent criticism and demonization of Israel and its supporters is frequently lodged in the language of antisemitism and the ridicule and exclusion of Jewish students.

Media attentionand outcry from liberal commentatorshas been far more muted after these incidents. At the very least, theres been little introspection at the growing prevalence of antisemitism committed by non-white supremacists.

Few recent episodes have highlighted this resounding silence more than the reaction to comments by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who in February 2019 took to Twitter to declare that American support for Israel is all about the Benjaminsa long-standing conspiracy theory that claims Jews use their allegedly vast wealth to exercise influence and political power.

Though she half-heartedly apologized, only weeks later she obliquely suggested that American Jews maintain dual loyalty to the United States and Israel. She also argued that her comments are unfairly labeled as antisemitic because she is Muslim.

Many progressives rallied around the embattled congresswoman, all the while telling concerned American Jews that she meant no harm and that attacks against her were motivated by Islamophobia.

This is a recurrent phenomenon in the discourse on antisemitism.

American Jews are perhaps the only minority community in America who are regularly told by progressives that what they view as antisemitism really isnt antisemitism. As the British comedian and writer David Baddiel notes in his book Jews Dont Count:

It is a progressive article of faith, Baddiel notes, that those who do not experience racism need to listen, to learn, to accept and not challenge, when others speak about their experiences. Except, it seems, when Jews do. Non-Jews, including progressive non-Jews, are still very happy to tell Jews whether or not the utterance about them was in fact racist.

I was reminded of this odd circumstance in an exchange with the MSNBC anchor Mehdi Hasan. In the hours after the Colleyville incident he used his nightly newscast to express solidarity with the American Jewish community. You are not alone. We have your back. And in this moment of fear, hate, and violence, you can count on the rest of us, Hasan said.

Many Jews were rightly gratified by Hasans empathetic words. However, after I pointed out on Twitter that its not enough to simply express solidarity with Jews after high-profile incidents, Hasan directed me to an op-ed hed written several years ago defending then-British Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn.

Corbyn had infamously made a host of antisemitic comments. He also associated with and defended virulent Jew-haters. But after British Jews published an open letter decrying Corbyn as an existential threat to Jewish life in the U.K., Hasan wrote, Dont. Be. Silly. He added that it was possible to commit to both defeating antisemitism and electing a Corbyn-led government.

I dont write to point fingers at Hasanwho is humane, fiercely honest, and whose heart is clearly in the right place. Rather, I offer up this admonition as a teachable moment.

Allyship means listening to American Jews when they point out antisemitism, not questioning what centuries of experience have taught us about anti-Jewish hatred. Having our back only some of the time is not enough.

Allyship also means looking inward at the ways that antisemitism has taken root and flourished in American society.

Indeed, the Texas hostage-taker took hostages in a synagogue because he believed that Jews exercise disproportionate power in the United States, and that by taking Jews captive his demands to free a convicted Islamic terrorist would be met.

It is an idea that is widely held across the political spectrum, from those who highlight the allegedly out-sized power of prominent philanthropists like George Soros to those who see financial suasion as the explanation for American support for Israel. Quite often, non-Jews use anti-Jewish tropes or speak in the language of antisemitism, not even understanding the prejudicial nature of their words. Thats why its so important to listen to Jews when they talk about the sometimes subtle nature of antisemitismand the scars it leaves behindjust as we must listen to any minority community talk about prejudice.

The best possible response to anti-Jewish hatred is not just to speak up in the immediate aftermath of incidents like the one in Colleyville. Thats easy. The hard part is recognizing antisemitism when it occurs in its more benign, but common formsand forcefully speaking out against it.

Frankly, Jews need to more forcefully demand such attention from their nominal progressive allies. Far too often we accept a few breadcrumbs of support rather than demanding more than just fancy words.

Quite simply, if you can speak out against Jews being held hostage in a synagogue but balk at condemning the routine use of antisemitic tropes by your political and cultural allies, then American Jews should not be in interested in ritualistic affirmations of support.

If you want to be true allies of American Jews, thoughts and prayers simply wont do.

Continue reading here:
Progressive Allies Need to Call Out Everyday Antisemitism - The Daily Beast

Bidens first year adds progressive shakeups to centrist foreign policy agenda – The National

US President Joe Biden ran his 2020 election campaign as the unabashedly centrist candidate in a field dominated by Democratic primary opponents making broad appeals to the left and a Republican general election opponent leaning further and further to the right.

Throughout his first year in office, Mr Biden has kept most of his foreign policy agenda in line with the traditional centrist ethos that has long dominated much of Washingtons Democratic foreign policy establishment.

Still, he has made some slight adjustments coupled with one major overhaul in Afghanistan to his centrist agenda with initiatives favoured by progressive foreign policy advocacy groups that had gained increasing clout among Democrats in Congress under former president Donald Trump.

Biden has been an interesting mix, said Greg Treverton, an international relations scholar at the University of Southern California and former chairman of the National Intelligence council.

On balance, with a couple of exceptions like Afghanistan, I think hes been a fairly traditional centrist Democrat on foreign policy.

The notable exception to Mr Bidens centrist track record was the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, a move lobbied for by an alliance of both progressive and conservative advocacy organisations that occurred despite warnings from the congressionally mandated Afghanistan Study Group.

Mr Biden had opposed US troop surges in Afghanistan under the Obama administration and had pledged to withdraw US combat troops from the country while campaigning for the presidency.

He long wanted to get out of Afghanistan, however badly that got executed, said Mr Treverton. And I still think on balance, it was the right thing to do, but it would have been nice to do it a little more gracefully.

A Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll from September found that 58 per cent of American voters approved of withdrawing from Afghanistan, even as 59 per cent disapproved of the way Mr Biden did it.

Trita Parsi, executive vice president at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, noted that large parts of both the Democratic and Republican electoral bases supported withdrawing from Afghanistan despite widespread resistance to the move among Washington foreign policymakers.

Its more whether Biden has pursued the status quo, pro-blob foreign policy or if he has deviated from it, said Mr Parsi. I cant point to a lot of things besides Afghanistan or the early policy on Yemen to indicate that were going to shift away from the blob.

Blob, in reference to Washingtons foreign policy establishment, is a concept first coined by Mr Obamas then-foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes in response to critiques over the former presidents policies in places such as Iran and Syria.

Upon taking office, Mr Biden announced the end of offensive American support to the Saudi-led coalition fighting the Houthis in Yemen and revoked Mr Trumps last-minute designation of the group as a terrorist organisation an action that had blocked the delivery of US humanitarian aid to areas in Yemen controlled by the Iran-backed rebels.

But the Biden administration has approved a $650 million arms sale to replenish Saudi Arabia's stock of air-to-air missiles depleted by countering Houthi drone attacks and a separate $500m deal to service and maintain attack helicopters that the kingdom already has in its possession.

Saudi policy, certainly early on, was absolutely a nod to the progressives and their desires to castigate Saudi Arabia, said Jonathan Schanzer, senior vice president at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies.

Still, Mr Schanzer called Mr Bidens foreign policy a mixed bag between the centrist and leftist forces within the Democratic party and framed it as to an attempt to hearken back to Obama administration policies, which are left but not hard left".

A prime example of that would be the Gaza war in May of last year, he said. For the first nine days, there was a sense that Biden was hewing to that centrist Democrat pro-Israel perspective to let Israel take care of its own business.

However, Mr Schanzer noted that the president began to issue harsher statements with regard to Israel and specifically to then-prime minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu before an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire took effect.

At the same time, Mr Biden has resisted growing calls within his party to restrict military aid to Israel and has endorsed a $1 billion increase in Iron Dome missile defence funding for the close US ally.

Nonetheless, an August poll from the Chicago Council survey found that only 22 per cent of Democrats view Israel as an ally while 62 per cent of the partys voters support restrictions on US military aid to the country.

Iraq and Syria mark another area where Mr Biden has resisted domestic calls to scale back the US military presence in the Middle East.

Mr Biden said during the Democratic primary that it would be a mistake to pull out the small number of troops in Syria and Iraq, citing ISIS as a concern.

In addition to maintaining the 2,500 US troops in Iraq and 900 soldiers in Syria, Mr Biden has also launched air strikes against Iran-backed militias in each country after attacks on American forces.

Pulling out of Iraq would not have led to the chaos of Afghanistan, would not have led to the falling of the Baghdad government, would not have led to people falling [off] planes on to the tarmac, said Mr Parsi. In Syria, we dont even have an authorisation there.

While Mr Biden has lined up behind Democratic efforts in Congress to revoke the 2002 authorisation that allowed for the invasion of Iraq a repeal that would not affect the current US force posture there his White House has balked at efforts to repeal the 2001 authorisation that serves as the basis for American counter-terrorism operations across the globe.

US Marines keep watch as unseen Afghan National Army soldiers participate in an IED (improvised explosive device) training exercise at the Shorab Military Camp in 2017. AFP

The Biden administration has cited the authorisation as the legal rationale to maintain US troops in Syria as well as continue counter-terrorism operations throughout the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

Hes snakebitten after Afghanistan, said Mr Schanzer.

Its very hard to do that again in another place and precipitate a collapse of the US-led order after having already done it.

I think a lesson must have been learnt, and at a minimum, its probably prompting the White House to take a beat, if not longer, before considering something like that again.

Updated: January 20th 2022, 7:25 PM

Visit link:
Bidens first year adds progressive shakeups to centrist foreign policy agenda - The National