Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Here are 11 of the most popular progressive policies to run on and 5 of the least popular – AlterNet

New polling from the progressive pollster Data for Progress, described in a new piece Monday atVox, points the way forward for Democrats looking to oust President Donald Trump from the White House and enact a liberal policy agenda.

Progressives often argue that their plans are broadly popular with Americans, and that these ideas are only prevented from becoming reality because of an obstinate Republican Party weaponizing racism and misinformation, archaic political institutions that stymie significant efforts at reform, and corruption across the two parties that allows special and corporate interests to undermine the popular will. And there is a fair amount of truth in this idea some progressive idea are remarkably popular, and theres no good reason they havent been implemented yet.

But its not true that a progressive policy wishlist would garner majority support across the board, and anyone hoping to see real, positive change should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their preferred platform. Acknowledging this doesnt mean politicians cant ever run on or enact ideas that lack majority support sometimes leaders have to do what they think is right and take the hit, and some unpopular ideas are necessary but it just reflects the fact that any candidate with a considered electoral strategy should focus on the areas where they have the strongest popular support.

So whats actually popular?

One strength of the Data for Progress polling is that, instead of simply asking respondents how they feel about a specific idea, the firm listed two broad-brush arguments in favor of and against each policy, framed as coming from either Democrats or Republicans. This method should offer a better sense of how voters might respond to an issue in the context of a campaign, where both defenders and critics of a policy will have the chance to speak their minds. If a policy still retains strong support from respondents even after hearing pro and con arguments, we can be more confident that running on the idea makes for good politics.

As Voxs Matt Yglesias noted, under this type of polling, Medicare-for-All is less popular than it may appear in other surveys. Under four different versions of the question, Medicare-for-All scores support around 40 percent or a bit higher, while the opposition was slightly lower. A substantial number of people were undecided.

While defenders of the idea may take the policys slim lead as a victory, its clear that theres a lot of risk involved in an electoral strategy based on the policy. Many people are undecided, and they could be convinced to turn against it. And its important to remember that, because of the structure of the Senate, House of Representatives and the electoral college, a policy that has a slim popular lead in national polls maybe be a net negative in terms of how that support translates into who gets elected at the federal level.

But there is good news for Democrats on health care, which is consistently a central issue for voters. Three central policies that could be done either as a part of or separate from a broader Medicare-for-All push poll quite favorably.

In particular, three ideas to lower prescription drug prices revoking patent rights on the most expensive drugs, government-run manufacturing of generic drugs when there isnt much competition in the market, and a big boost in government funding for pharmaceutical R&D all hit the ball out of the park in terms of popularity, wrote Yglesias.

All three policies have support above 50 percent, and less than 30 percent of the population opposes the plans. Emphasizing these ideas in an election could likely help win over voters without scaring too many people away.

Other popular ideas

Family leave: Asked if they support a policy that would guarantee new parents and other caregivers 12 weeks of paid leave for childbirth or serious medical issues, 60 percent favored it, while only 25 percent opposed it.

100 percent clean energy: Asked whether they favor a plan to transition the economy to 100 percent clean energy by 2045, 51 percent favored it while 30 percent opposed it.

Clean water: Asked whether they favor updating and strengthening the Clean Water Act, 61 percent offered support while only 19 percent said no. As Yglesias noted: The Trump administration has beenrelentlessly hostile to clean water measures, and Democrats have scarcely pushed back. But this polling indicates that tougher clean water rules are very popular, and predictable arguments dont change that.

Corruption: The poll also asked people whether they would like to ban members of Congress and senior government officials from owning stock in companies, and require presidents to sell assets that pose a conflict of interest. Additionally, the policy would ban senior government officials from engaging in lobbying for several years after leaving office.

This policy, which has been a centerpiece of the campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), garnered 51 percent support and only 26 percent opposition.

Interest rate controls on credit cards: This policy would stop credit card companies from charging more than 15 percent interest per year. The poll found 61 percent favored this idea, while 21 percent opposed it.

Ending U.S. support for the war in Yemen: 46 percent of people approved of the idea, while 28 percent opposed it.

Lead paint removal:57 percent of people supported a plan toremove lead paint in all housing, schools and playgrounds, while only 23 percent opposed it.

Marijuana: Respondents were asked whether they support a policy where marijuana possession would be legal for those at least 21 years old. Additionally, the sale of marijuana would be legalized, taxed, and regulated. 59 percent were in favor of this idea, while only 27 percent opposed it.

Unpopular ideas

Decriminalizing unauthorized border crossing:This policy would involve decriminalizing illegal entry into the United States, which means that illegal entry would be treated as a civil, rather than criminal matter and dealt with by the civil court system.

Only 30 percent supported this idea, while 52 percent opposed it.

Cutting military spending: Asked whether they favor cutting back on our military spending for wasteful procurement of weapons systems, 33 percent supported it, while 47 percent opposed it.

Ending cash bail:This policy would shift from the current money-bail-only system to one that allows judges to release most defendants until they have been convicted of a crime. Only 35 percent of people support the idea, while 44 percent oppose it.

Reparations: Asked whether they support cash reparations to the descendants of slaves, only 21 percent said yes, while 58 percent said no.

Sectoral bargaining:Respondents were asked if they supported a policy under which sections of the US economy are unionized as a whole. Only 28 percent said yes, while 47 percent said no.

You can find the questions included in the poll here, and the results here.

Now, to be clear, even if a policy is unpopular, that doesnt mean its a bad idea; it certainly doesnt mean that activists shouldnt try to convince people to support it, or even that politicians shouldnt ever support it or try to argue in its favor. But politics is about winning votes, and politicians wont even be able to pass the good, popular ideas if theyre saddled down with too many unpopular positions. So they should be aware of which parts of their platforms are strengths and which are vulnerabilities and then strategize accordingly.

Link:
Here are 11 of the most popular progressive policies to run on and 5 of the least popular - AlterNet

Erica Smith Sees Herself as a Progressive Idealist Taking on the Party Machine. But the Democratic Senate Primary Isn’t That Simple. – INDY Week

Erica Smith is late.

Her empty chair sits on the stage beside three men hoping to challenge Thom Tillis this fall. National Democrats have pinned their hopes on the one to the far left, Cal Cunningham, a six-foot-tall veteran in a dark gray suit who has, by today, January 25, already raised north of $3 million.

Cunningham looks like a senator, like one youd order from central casting. If you close your eyes and think of the words North Carolina Democrat, something like him probably comes to mind. Hes from a small town. He served in a war. He has a beautiful wife and picture-perfect children. Hes a successful lawyer. He has a winning smile. Hes politically nonthreatening.

Cunningham grips the mic with intention. Though seated, his voice projects loudly to the audience at the Raleigh-Wake Citizens Associations candidate forum, his confidence tangible as he regurgitates soundbites from his by-now-familiar commercials, his tone somewhere between that of a minister and a car salesman.

Together this fall, were going to replace Thom Tillis in the U.S. Senate, he says.

He repeats, nearly verbatim, remarks he gave a few hours earlier at an NAACP forum in Greenborohow when he served as senior trial counsel in Iraq and Afghanistan, he could have never imagined that the countrys greatest threat would come from Washington, D.C.

Erica Smith was late to that forum, too.

Cunningham finishes. Little-known candidate Steve Swenson goes next, offering a forgettable introduction. Hes followed by Mecklenburg County Commissioner Trevor Fuller, who stands to address the crowd. Cunningham appears to take a mental note, wishing hed done the same.

As the candidates spar over the first question from the panel, Erica Smith bursts through the doors in the back of the room and bolts to claim her space on stage. Shes in an elegant navy pantsuit, but her style has a certain joyous imperfection. The state senator, who has represented North Carolinas rural northeastern edge for the last five years, asks to be allowed an introduction.

With the mic in her hand, her energy consumes the room. Unscripted and jarringly earnest, Smith recounts her journey from Boeing engineer to teacher and preacher, from being raised in Eastern North Carolina to working her way up the ranks of the General Assembly.

Smith was the first Democrat to enter the race, back in January 2019. In June and again in August, she made a pitch to the partys powerbrokers in D.C., but she says they were noncommittal. She later learned the DSCC had met with Cunningham in May. He got the groups endorsement in October.

She says she knew the campaign would be an uphill battle. But her entire life has been an uphill battle. She grew up poor and black. She almost died in childbirth. She watched her youngest son die and her second husband get charged with rape.

But shes persevered. Everything shes accomplished, she did herself, through grit and determination and her unassailable brilliance. She was made for the hustleand made from it. At 50, shes learned not to listen to the doubters.

There are plenty of doubters. Objectively, theres good reason to doubt.

At the end of 2019, Cunningham had an 111 cash advantage, which has helped him buy TV ads and amass a 27-point lead in the most recent poll.

Gary Pearce, a former adviser to Governor Jim Hunt, says that to win elections, you need to abide by the two Ms rule: You need a message, and you need moneyand the organization that money buysto get your message out. Smith has the first. She lacks the second.

Particularly Democrats, were idealists, Pearce told me. We like to think money is the root of evil, and it is, in a lot of cases. But its also the only way to get information to people.

Smith isnt listening. Shes focused on the hustleswearing off corporate PAC money, driving from forum to forum on a shoestring budget, taking her message to voters one at a time if she has to. The system is broken, she says, especially for women of color. But it doesnt have to be. Shes determined to prove that big ideas can overcome big money.

Lets be honest here, she says. Black women are never going to have the money that white men have. We dont earn dollar for dollar. We earn 65 cents on the dollar. As a public school educator, I dont have $50,000 to loan to my campaign. I have truly shown what can be done with a reasonable budget a reasonable fundraising plan. If you truly want big money out of politics, then you will back the candidate that is based on the merit and the message.

But Tillis is vulnerable, and this isnt an election Democratic bigwigs are willing to lose by gambling on an ideological purist.

The party, says political consultant Perry Woods, made a raw calculation who they think can best win. Theres a moral imperative. Whats on the line, frankly, this year is whether we are going to continue the great American experiment and save our democracy.

Smiths supporters would counter that, while Cunningham is likable, hes not exciting. Shes the races wildcard, a candidate willing to buck convention. The question is, how far can a candidate go swimming against the tide?

James Calvin Cunningham III grew up in Lexington, population 19,000, the self-proclaimed barbecue capital of the world, where the town hall contains 19th-century brick pits, prominently displayed.

I love my barbecue, Cunningham says, biting into a bacon, egg, and cheese croissant at Cafe Carolina, a few blocks from his house in Cameron Village. Hes sprawled out at a table in the back beside his communications manager. A white three-ring binder packed full of notes and research sits open on the table.

The oldest of three children, Cunningham says he learned to take responsibility at a young age. He grew up active in the church and mowed lawns on the weekends to save up for his first guitar. He attended Vanderbilt University before transferring to the UNC-Chapel Hill, where he studied political science and philosophy. He graduated in 1996, then earned his law degree from UNC School of Law.

Without missing a beat, Cunningham launched into his political career. In 2000, he ran for the General Assembly at age 27, and won, but only served one term before redistricting turned his rural district, south of Winston-Salem, red.

After 9/11, Cunningham joined the army reserves. In 2007, he shipped out to Iraq to serve as a prosecutor, working with the Judge Advocate Generals office to weed out misconduct among military contractors. For that work, Cunningham was awarded the Bronze Star and General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award. He carried a gun, but he never fired it at an enemy. For exercise, he ran around the base in Baghdad. Time moved slowly.

In 2010, he returned to the Middle East to serve a second tour in Afghanistan, a country he describes as even more desolate and primitive. At least in Iraq, he says, there was a McDonalds.

(Of North Carolinas major cities, Cunningham is most likely to meet resistance in Durham. In 2013, he represented a controversial luxury housing development known as 751 South. The city and county governments tried to block it. Cunningham, however, leaned on his relationship with future House Speaker Tim Moorea law school friendto get the General Assembly to force the city to provide water and sewer to the project.)

Cunninghams pitch to Democrats is straightforward: He can beat Thom Tillis, a former state House speaker who narrowly defeated Senator Kay Hagan six years ago, but who is now one of the least popular incumbents in the country. Tillis ran promising to be an independent voice, but hes bound himself to President Trump, hoping the presidents coattails are long enough to pull him over the finish line.

Tilliss inevitable efforts to paint his opponent as a wild-eyed socialist wont work on him, Cunningham says, no matter whos atop the Democratic ticket.

Hes more moderate than Erica Smith on issues like health care and the climate crisis. He wants a public option, not Medicare for All. Hes been an environmental lawyer, but he hasnt signed on to the Green New Deal. He voted for Pete Buttigiega fellow veterannot Bernie Sanders. Hell appeal to the suburbs, not play to the base. Hes not running to spark a revolution but to restore dignity.

Today, he tells me, is his daughters 18th birthday (yes, shes registered to vote), and shes responsible for his decision to run for officelieutenant governor at first, then U.S. Senate. One morning last year, as the family was getting ready for school, she heard someone on television talking about one of Trumps late-night Twitter rants. Suddenly, his normally reserved daughter pointed at the TV: So what are you gonna do about it, Dad?

Cunningham tells this story a lot. He tells a lot of his stories a lot. Theres nothing Cunningham tells me that he hasnt told thousands of potential voters already (save, perhaps, for an admission that he loves the Grateful Dead). He is careful and disciplined. He knows the script and he sticks to it.

Hes also very intelligent and very organized. And his campaign is a well-oiled machine.

While we finish breakfast, a gaggle of staffers is already driving to Greensboro, where Cunningham would address the NAACP in a few hours. We leave in time to arrive early.

His communications manager takes the wheel of a silver Jeep Compass, and Cunningham assumes the front seat. I ask questions to the back of his head. He leafs through the white three-ring binder.

I ask if he color-coordinatesall of his binders.

No, he replies. His binders are always white. I ask why.

White is for the good guys. Ive never rethought it.

Erica Smith is late.

Her black and gray poncho is slung over the stall door of the Sheetz bathroom. She shuffles inside, changing into evening wear.

I change in gas stations all the time, she says.

Smith has no gaggle of advance staff, no communications manager to drive her, no staff photographer snapping pictures everywhere she goes, no white three-ring binders. Her campaign is often her and her identical twin, Alicia, who hates politics but loves her sister, as well as a campaign manager and some volunteers who may or may not show up when needed. Shes always rushing. Theres always chaos. TodayFebruary 8is no different.

We were supposed to head to Alicias house in Durham so Smith could change before driving to Charlotte, where shell deliver a keynote to the nations second-oldest black sorority, Delta Sigma Theta. But we lingered too long at the HKonJ rally in Raleigh, so the Sheetz off Miami Boulevard will have to do.

Smiths car, a red Toyota Venza hatchback, is a mobile closet, full of dress pants, blouses, dresses, and shoes. Alicia rummages through the trunk as Smith emerges from the gas station in a sparkly red dress suit and bright blue sneakers. Smith flings stilettos onto the pavement as she puts mismatched heels on her stockinged feet and asks which pair matches the dress.

This is real, people, Smith laughs. A real democracy.

They go with taupe.

Alicia and Erica were born in Fort Bragg to a military family and moved to the Philippines and then Texas before eventually settling on a farm in Gaston, where the girls spent summers waking up in the dark to pick cucumbers for the farmers market. The family wasnt well off. They needed the money.

After high school, Erica and Alicia attended North Carolina A&T State University and earned engineering degrees. Erica moved to Seattle to work for Boeing after graduation, and four years later followed her husband to Washington, D.C., where she got a job with the U.S. Patent Office.

She married, had two children, and divorced, moving back to Gaston to care for her ailing father while continuing to commute several hours a day to the patent office. Sick of the commute, she started teaching math in Virginia public schools. She married and divorced again. She earned a masters degree in divinity from Howard University and got ordained. Following her first divorce, Smith ventured into politics. In 2006, she unsuccessfully ran for the school board in Northampton County, then ran again and won two years later. Shed been mapping out her next stepthe state Senatesince 2005, but really, it had been a dream since childhood.

In 2014, she made her move, challenging Democratic incumbent Clark Jenkins in the primary. She wonby eight points*. Despite working in a Republican supermajority, she was named Freshman Senator of the Year in 2016.

She started thinking about moving up again. She set her eyes on the U.S. Senate.

It hasnt been a smooth ride.

During her first year in the legislature, her second husband, Maud Ingram, was indicted on rape charges.

Smith doesnt like to talk about itout of respect for the victims, she says. When I ask how it affected her, she deflects.

We kept our eyes focused on our work and the community we serve and raising my family and getting us through that crisis, Smith says. I never paused to think about how I feel and how it affects me because the priority is the other people who were impacted by this, whose lives were devastated.

She did the only thing she knew how to do: She kept going. Shed done it before when shed met tragedy.

During her third pregnancy, Smith suffered from hypertension. At the end of her second trimester, tests showed the baby was in distress. Her doctors asked her who she wanted to saveher or her baby.

At 37, Smith decided she was prepared to die.

Despite the odds, Elias was born at 24 weeks, weighing just over one pound. But he suffered a cranial bleed and had to be given a tracheostomy due to his prematurity. And so began Smiths agonizing years-long battle with her insurance company, which refused to cover a component for Eliass trach tube and initially denied her request for an in-home aide.

It only ended when Elias died in 2012 at the age of five.

But Smith didnt give in to anger or sadness.

There are people all over this nation who go through worse, and every day they have to fight their way to get up. I have always had a strong support system and a positive outlook on life, Smith says. Its not what happens to you, its how you respond and how you keep moving forward.

Smith is funny and down to earth, smart and quirky. She looks you in the eyes and makes you feel seen.

There was a fundraiser scheduled for after her speech in Charlotte, but Smith hears theres a power outage, so she cancels it. Raising money isnt her top priority, she says.

As I write this, Smith says shes raised $275,000, mostly from small donors, $5 or $10 at a time.

Were already 20 minutes late to the sorority event when snow starts to speckle the windshield. Alicia starts to worry. Erica puts on headphones and meditates, her pre-speech ritual.

The chaos never fazes her.

Cunningham wasnt Chuck Schumers first choice. Or second, or third.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee courted state Senator Jeff Jackson, former state Senator Eric Mansfield, and former Treasurer Janet Cowell before it glanced in Cunninghams direction. Jackson would later say he turned the party down because he didnt want to spend 16 months in a windowless basement dialing donors for money to run attack ads on Tillis.

To hear Cunningham tell it, the DSCC didnt recruit him at all. In the spring of 2019, he was traveling the state, campaigning for lieutenant governor. But the people he met asked him to take on Tillis instead.

Every time I was having a conversation, and invariably, and I can say this with almost no exception: Why arent you offering to run against Thom Tillis? It was over and over and over again, Cunningham says. It just took off, and it made sense, and it was never about anyone else.

Like so much of what Cunningham says, this story has a canned, almost robotic quality to it.

But no matter whose idea it was, to party officials running out of options, Cunninghamand the $500,000 hed already raised (including $200,000 hed loaned himself)was increasingly attractive. The DSCC knew him, too. The party had backed him in 2010, when he challenged Elaine Marshall in a messy Senate primary.

Marshall came out nine points ahead but didnt secure a majority. Cunningham called for a runoff. Marshall crushed him, winning by 20. But she had to spend time and money doing ittime and money that could have gone toward battling Richard Burr, to whom the now-secretary of state lost handily.

Marshall got no help from the DSCC.

Thomas Mills is still salty about that.

I have a lot of resentments against them, says Mills, a Democratic consultant who ran Marshalls campaign. Had [the DSCC] not pushed the primary, Elaine may have had a lot more money, and they may have been putting more money into the race behind us.

In June, Cunningham announced that he was abandoning his lieutenant governor campaign to run for Senate. By July, it was clear the party was in his corner. Out-of-state donations poured in; donors maxed out. In October, the DSCC made it official, formally endorsing Cunninghams campaign.

Smith issued a blistering response: This endorsement cuts to the integrity and ethics of this election. If the DSCC has been involved all along, then it should disclose the details of its prior involvement to the voters of North Carolina. Ultimately, the voters of North Carolina will decide who their next United States Senator will beNOT a handful of DC politicians making backroom deals in windowless basements.

The DSCC, Smith says, has a history of not endorsing black candidates and not backing women. Progressives have sharply criticized the partys involvement. In a state that, not counting judicial races, has only elected one black person to a statewide position, the partys decision couldnt help but be seen through a racial prism. Indeed, earlier this month, civil rights leader the Reverend William J. Barber II blasted the party on Twitter for picking a candidate in the primary.

But Mills thinks the DSCC was simply being pragmatic: This is a race Democrats need to win to take back the Senate. And they looked at Smith and saw a campaignand a candidatethat wasnt ready for primetime.

Three months after Smith entered the race in January 2019, shed raised just $21,000. To the DSCC, thats a red flag; it costs about $40,000 a month to run a large-scale statewide political operation.

The only reason to get into a race that early is to clear the field, Mills says. And you do that showing you can raise the money and you can put together the organization.

Had she done those things, she would have been a strong contender. To win statewide, Democrats need high African American turnout and for suburban women to break their way. With the right message, Smith could likely deliver both.

You could make an argument, strongly, that Erica would be better on the ticket to turn out votes, Woods says. More minorities and low-information voters may be more willing to show up to vote for Erica than for Cal.

But, he adds, Erica has not demonstrated the ability to raise the money its going to take. Its sad, but its where we are.

In February, TV ads went up all over the state praising Smith for her commitment to the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, spliced with a picture of progressive darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She was the real deal, the black narrator said, the races only proven progressive.

But the ads didnt come from the Smith campaign. Instead, they came from a brand-new PAC called Faith and Power, which, media outlets quickly learned, had ties to the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee.

Last week, The Hill reported that Faith and Power was funded by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells super PAC.

Smith disavowed the ads, but it didnt matter. The message, according to Cunningham, was clear: Tillis was afraid of him, so Republicans were trying to prop up a weaker adversary.

It probably illustrates the stakesthat they see that Thom Tillis is extraordinarily weak, very vulnerable, and that their best play is to cause mischief, Cunningham says. Were wise to it, and were on alert that there will be more to come.

In response, Cunningham upped his own ad buy. He already has PACs working on his behalf: The Vote Vets Action Fund has shelled out more than $6 million so far, while Carolina Blue has spent $1.1 million promoting Cunningham.

He has little reason to be concerned: The most recent poll, from Public Policy Polling, has him besting Smith 4518.

Somehow, we arrive at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Charlotte at precisely 2:00 p.m.late, but in time for Smith to give her keynote address to Delta Sigma Theta. As we enter the banquet hall, were greeted by a sea of crimson dresses. As frenzied as the day has been, everything worked out. The same was true with the RWCA event: She came late, but she got the groups endorsement.

This sort of serendipity lends itself to faith, and Smith has that in abundance. Her speech is a rousing sermon on the urgency of the moment. Shes sick of waiting for the patriarchy to give her the green light. Rosa Parks didnt wait. Shirley Chisholm didnt wait.

Erica Smith isnt going to wait.

Shes bitter at the DSCCbitter that the party interfered, that party elites tried to erase her, that they chose a white man over a black woman. But damned if shes going to let that stop her. Shes never listened to doubters before. Shes not going to start now.

We cannot wait another day, Smith tells the crowd. Until we have a voice that looks like us, understands us, has been through our struggles, been through our troubles, we dont need to wait another day!

Continued here:
Erica Smith Sees Herself as a Progressive Idealist Taking on the Party Machine. But the Democratic Senate Primary Isn't That Simple. - INDY Week

Lots of doors to knock: Meet Arati Kreibich, the progressive challenger to Josh Gottheimer – NorthJersey.com

Arati Kreibich speaks to volunteers before a Hackensack canvass launch Sunday, Feb. 16, 2020. Wochit

Its a chilly Sunday in Hackensack, and Pat Henrys 100-year-old house is packed with volunteers.Henrys living room has an eclectic mix of colorfulchairs. One is lime green, nearly as bright as the green stripe on the campaign signs taped to the walls.

The signs promoteArati Kreibich, the Glen Rock councilwoman, immigrant, neuroscientist and mother challengingRep. Josh Gottheimer for New Jerseys Fifth District Democratic nomination.

Volunteers gather ahead of a canvass launch Sunday, Feb. 16, 2020.(Photo: Alexis Shanes)

AJune 2019 vote by Gottheimer turned Kreibich, who immigrated to the U.S. from India when she was 11, from activist to congressional candidate. Gottheimer led a faction that pressedHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her Democratic caucus to pass an emergency border funding bill that did not include somekey aid for detained migrant families.

The minute I realized he did that, to me, he made me morally complicit, Kreibich told NorthJersey.com. I dont know how you can do that as a human being. Most people know and understand the humanitarian crisis.

By the time Kreibich steppedup on the ottoman at the back of Henry's livingroom to rally the volunteers, thecolorful chairs werefull, and some people sat on a gray shag rug. It wasthe Kreibich campaigns third canvass launch and the largest yet, with 40 volunteers ready to knock doors.

Afterward, Kreibich steppedout onto Henrys porch, where a roll of campaign stickers sat on a folding table. Kreibich checkedher phone for updates from her husband and two sons, ages 11 and 14, who were ata debate tournament.

Arati Kreibich.(Photo: Arati Kreibich for Congress)

Reena Chojar followedher. Chojar, 27, began volunteering for Kreibichs campaign a month ago. She grew up in Saddle River and calls Kreibich a really cool candidate.Kreibich and Chojar climbed into the volunteers car, drovea few blocks,parked, and ventured to the first address on Chojars clipboard.

Kreibich pickedup a newspaper inthe driveway and brought it to the front door. Nobody answered. She left a campaign palm card. At another house, she pushed a Ring video doorbell and waveda palm card for the camera. Nobody answered. Well keep going, she said, cheerfully. Its still fun.

Nobody knew Kreibich when she ran for Glen Rock council. She realized Sunday afternoon canvasses worked best, with bonus points for rainy days that left residents cooped up at home. Glen Rock, she said, is a microcosm. Im surprised at how much the stories are the same.

Kreibichs volunteer team plans to knock on 1,000 doors aweek. By the end of the campaign, they hope tohave knocked on 100,000. Cup of coffee says theyre home, Kreibich toldChojar as they approached another house. Ice cream. I dont know. They laughed and rangthe doorbell. Nobody answered.

Campaign signs are displayed on a house Sunday, Feb. 16, 2020.(Photo: Alexis Shanes)

The first person who actually openeda door on thisdaywasstaunchly anti-Trump. Are you going to fight his agenda? the man asked. Kreibich said yes.Let me see that, he said, taking a pen to sign the petition that will put Kreibich on the June 2, 2020, primary ballot.Kreibich broughtup her opponent's vote for border wall funding, and the man wassurprised. We deserve a lot of changes, he said.

Kreibich deftly engagesreluctant voters in conversation. People, she said, simply want to be heard, given a chance to share their stories.

The environment we live in doesnt allow us to be nice to each other, one man said. Were just too stressed to do better. They talked for a few minutes and he agreedto vote for Kreibich. You guys made a good case, he said.

Reader covering our local communities takes time and resources. Support our journalism by becoming a subscriber today ="left"> see our special offers.

A woman who openedthe door at ahouse with two small American flags was worried about the way things are going and about immigration. She agreedwith Trump about one thing: immigrants should use legal means to enter the country.

But he thinks everyones a criminal, she added. You cant put everybody in the same category. Is she going to vote for Kreibich in the primary? You know what? I am, she said. Do you have more cards?

Another woman recognizedKreibich. Youre running against Gottheimer, she said. I know a few volunteers who might be interested.

Kreibichs campaign ended 2019 with roughly $170,000 raised. Her largest donor invested $2,800,the federal limit for an individual. Meanwhile, Gottheimers campaign receipts totaled $3.5 million at the end of the year, according to Federal Election Commission filings. The congressman ranks13th in money raised among his House colleagues. He is a top funding recipient fromsecurities firms, hedge funds and private equity firms.

Reena Chojar helps a volunteer gather candidate information ahead of a canvass Sunday, Feb. 16, 2020.(Photo: Alexis Shanes)

Gottheimers war chest helped him topple seven-term Republican incumbent Scott Garrett in 2016. He was the glimmer of hope we had in the 2016 election, Kreibich said. The Fifth District, which covers a diversely liberal and conservativeswath of Bergen, Passaic, Sussex and Warren Counties, went 48.8 percent for Trump that year.

The first Democrat in 84years to win his seat, Josh has proudly built a strong record as a pro-choice, pro-equality, tax-cutting Democrat who defied the odds to defeat a seven-term Tea Party extremist in a district that President Trump won," saidAndrew Edelson, spokesperson for Gottheimer for Congress, adding that the incumbent's views are consistent with the people in his district.

But Kreibich says the region is ready for a progressive.

The neuroscientist made the environment a hallmark of her Glen Rock council run and now, it's front and center in her congressional campaign. People said not do that, she said. But as she talked to folks, environmental issues wereon their minds.

As a freshman councilwoman, she steered Glen Rock onto the list of New Jersey towns that banned single-use plastic bags. She was also involved in an effort to transition Glen Rock to 100 percent renewable energy via a community choice aggregation program.

She has attracted support frompeople like Henry, who spent most of her life noninvolved in politics until 2016. I was just a good girl Democrat, she said. The day Hillary Clinton lost, I lost my mind.

COLUMN: Democrats run everything in Trenton but can't get anything done | Stile

NEWS: Rep. Josh Gottheimer joins fellow NJ Democrats and backs Mike Bloomberg's presidential bid

MURPHY: Here's what will happen while Gov. Phil Murphy is out for surgery and when he'll be back

Henry is part of Indivisible Five, a grassroots non-profit with about 600 membersunaffiliated with any party or donor but positioned squarely againstTrump and the Republican congressional caucus. She campaigned heartily for Gottheimer.

After its members became disenchanted with him, the grassroots group threw its support behind Kreibich. Shes everything we need, Henry said. Intelligent. Kind.

Kreibichhas also gathered support from Food and Water Action, part of a non-profit focused on climate, food and water issues; and Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a political action committee that spent $7.3 million during the last election cycle and endorses high-profile progressives such as Democratic presidential contenderElizabeth Warren, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rep. Katie Porter of California.

The endorsements, Kreibich said, are key, andher campaign hopes they will spur donors.

Arati Kreibich and Reena Chojar talk to a prospective voter Sunday, Feb. 16, 2020.(Photo: Alexis Shanes)

Kreibichs path to candidacy is strewnwith barriers that extend well beyond funding. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, in a bid to protect the Democrats House majority, said it would blacklist private political firms that work for Democratic primary challengers. When Kreibich started recruiting staffers, many people wouldnt talk to her. Thats an undue burden to say you have to choose between possible future jobs and your values, she said.

Kreibich said its indicative of not allowing conversations about where the party is headed and of policiesthat suppress women and people of color for the sake of party unity.

The people it affects the worst are women who havent been allowed to be part of the political process for a long time, she said.

Had she known the barriers she would face, Kreibich might have been more daunted about entering the race, but she probably wouldnt have been deterred from running, she said.

People are going to come out for me because theyre sick of the establishment, sick of politics as usual,, Kreibich said. Its clear that Im not politics as usual. Its clear Im not doing this as a career politician.

"Its clear why Im doing it and what my values are," she added. And I think that resonates."

AlexisShanesis a local reporter for NorthJersey.com. For unlimited access to the most important news from your local community,please subscribe or activate your digital account today.

Email:shanesa@northjersey.comTwitter:@alexisjshanes

Read or Share this story: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2020/02/25/glen-rock-nj-progressive-kreibich-challenges-rep-josh-gottheimer-fifth-district-primary/4824528002/

View post:
Lots of doors to knock: Meet Arati Kreibich, the progressive challenger to Josh Gottheimer - NorthJersey.com

Why Many Progressives Say They’ve Come Back To Bernie Sanders – NPR

A year ago, many progressives told NPR they weren't so sure they wanted to see Bernie Sanders run for president again. But now, it appears those voters are coming back. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images hide caption

A year ago, many progressives told NPR they weren't so sure they wanted to see Bernie Sanders run for president again. But now, it appears those voters are coming back.

A year ago, some New Hampshire progressives, who had elevated Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders to a decisive victory in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary there, told NPR they weren't so sure they wanted to see him run for president again.

But with just days until the first votes of the 2020 presidential contest, in Iowa, it appears that progressives are coming back to Sanders. His polling has risen in recent weeks, as a number of progressive groups announced their support for him and as many voters on the left ultimately decided to stick with him.

Burt Cohen is one such voter.

He's known Sanders since the 1970s, and in the last presidential election he was a delegate for the Vermont senator at the Democratic National Convention.

But Cohen was initially skeptical of a Sanders sequel.

"I wasn't sure it was a good idea, to be perfectly honest," the former New Hampshire state senator-turned-podcast host said recently. "What held me back a little bit was, as Bernie says, 'It's not me, it's us,' and that so many other candidates were picking up what he was talking about."

Many progressives said similar things at the beginning of this campaign cycle. They felt the issues that Sanders has championed, such as "Medicare for All," were now part of the party's mainstream debate.

But as the campaign dragged on, some voters, like New Hampshire gubernatorial candidate Andy Volinsky, began to have doubts about other candidates.

"I am not convinced that Sanders' level of commitment to things like Medicare for All exists among very many other candidates," he said.

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren speaks during a campaign stop in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Sunday. Stephen Maturen/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren speaks during a campaign stop in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Sunday.

In 2016, Volinsky was Sanders' New Hampshire attorney. But this year, he took months to make a decision. He said he was impressed with Elizabeth Warren and even introduced her at a rally.

But he was worried that the Massachusetts senator is "not as readily accepted by working people as Bernie is."

That was a common concern voiced by progressive voters who said they had considered Warren before coming back to Sanders.

"I had been for Warren back in 2015," Cohen said. "I had a sticker on my car 'Run, Warren, Run.' "

He said Warren would make a "terrific" president but, he said, Democrats need a candidate who can win back the voters the party lost in 2016.

"Frankly," he said, "the Harvard, professorial style, I don't know how well that would do in the Midwest."

But that same concern is what led Bill Stelling away from Sanders, whom he supported in 2016, and toward Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., this year.

"One of the things about Bernie is that I don't think he's evolved very much since 2016," said Stelling, of Manchester, N.H. "He's delivering exactly the same message, but the world has changed."

This notion that consistency might not always be a virtue is perhaps progressives' most common critique of the Vermont senator.

A Sanders-or-Warren family

"Maybe Bernie hasn't changed, but the times have," said Ron Abramson.

He and his daughter, Quincy, both supported Sanders in 2016. He held a house party for the senator. She volunteered for him.

But this year, they're not in sync.

Ron wants a leader who can effectively govern and adapt if needed. He said that's Warren.

Quincy wants drastic change. She thinks capitalism is the root of almost every problem in this country, so she told her dad how she sees Warren: "She does know how to work within the system more and play the game better and, for you, that's pragmatic, and for me, that's scary."

Quincy is supporting Sanders again. She said she came to that decision partly because of how he speaks, compared with Warren.

"The feeling I get from the way Warren talks about going into office is, you know, 'I have a plan for that. Vote for me. Trust me, and I'll handle it,' " she said. "While Bernie's is, 'We have to do this together.' "

But Ron is skeptical of his daughter's interpretation of Sanders as a more collaborative leader.

"I appreciate that he has created a movement," he said, "but there's a fine line between a movement and a cult of personality."

Read the original:
Why Many Progressives Say They've Come Back To Bernie Sanders - NPR

Letter: We owe a debt of gratitude to liberals, progressives and conservatives – INFORUM

Lets start with a definition for each of these terms. Liberal means open to new behaviors or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. Progressives are known for favoring or implementing social reform or new liberal ideas. Conservatives hold onto traditional attitudes and values and are cautious about change.

Many in the United States have used these terms to denigrate people who they disagree with politically and socially. Yet we may find ourselves agreeing with parts of both viewpoints. For instance, you may be very conservative with your spending and liberal with your social beliefs. I personally know people I consider friends who are very conservative with their political beliefs but have accepted many liberal actions from the past. I also know people I consider friends who are very liberal with their social beliefs but are very conservative economically.

When we use history to study liberalism/progressivism and conservatism, we may see some hypocrisy in all of us. If you have or had a daughter who participated in high school sports, you really need to thank a liberal/progressive who pushed for this in the early 70s. If you appreciate women voting, you need to thank a liberal/progressive who pushed for womens suffrage over a hundred years ago. If you agree that children should be in school and not the work place, you need to give recognition to liberal/progressives. If you have taken your family to a national park, you need to thank liberal/progressives. If you believe that companies who prepare food products are liable for what they put in the product, thank liberal/progressives. If you believe corporations should not pollute our water, thank liberal/progressives.

If you believe traditional family structures have been a positive for society, you agree with conservatives. If you believe that individuals should take responsibility for their actions, you agree with conservatives. If you partake in traditional holidays, you agree with conservatives. If you believe the Constitution of the United States provides an ideal which we can follow, you agree with conservatives.

So, some liberals follow conservative practices and some conservatives accept the changes liberals have brought to the country. Can we really just be solely a liberal or solely a conservative when both sides have made contributions to the history of the United States.

The anger many individuals have toward others who hold differences of opinions is misplaced. To use the terms liberal and conservative as a means to belittle and demean others demonstrates ignorance of historical content and, more importantly, a blatant lack of respect for others.

I am a progressive. I cannot imagine that we cannot do better politically, economically and socially. As a progressive I have no business telling others how to pray, who to marry, or what to do with their money. It is not in my character to judge another human being. I would leave all the judging to the greatest progressive leader who changed the world over 2,000 years ago by teaching love, acceptance and sharing.

Read more:
Letter: We owe a debt of gratitude to liberals, progressives and conservatives - INFORUM