Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Why Progressives Will Always Fail – Ricochet.com

As I was working on another post, I had the realization that the Progressives will never be successful in transforming our country into a Leftist state. Their goals are to create a perfect country run by perfect people to create a perfect future. What they never seem to understand is how deeply flawed their aspirationsand theyare.

First, they are the most nave people among us. No matter how intelligent they are, they have no wisdom. No matter how educated they are, they dont understand human nature. Regardless of their passion for changing the country and everyone else, they are the ones who are incapable of learning deeply and understanding (as James Madison did) the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of human beings.

They think by offering a flawless world that we will all line up behind them. But we only need to look at them to realize the impossibility of their goals. These are people who need to feed off others accomplishments, steal the results of others successes, and are prepared to try to destroy the very elements of human nature that allow us to thrive and grow. It is our diversity, which they celebrate, that forecasts the failure of their dreams.

We have had too much success as a country and as a people for them to enlist or coerce us. We are a country born in freedom with more wealth and opportunity than any country in the world. Why would we give that up?

Most Americans (who arent Progressives) at some level realize the bounties they have realized. They can pursue any job they might desire. They can live anywhere in the country. They can have families of any size. They can travel wherever they choose. They can worship however they wish, in any community they choose, and can change their allegiance at any time.

Progressivism doesnt take into account that Americans, of all the peoples in the world, are incredibly blessed. They dont need to steal from others or give up any of the prospects for their futures. We speak the language of gratitude, opportunity, creativity, possibility, and fulfillment.

Progressives dont have a chance.

Read more here:
Why Progressives Will Always Fail - Ricochet.com

Progressives target the political sausage-making in Boston – The Boston Globe

The campaign to push ward committees to the left represents a broader shift of the political landscape in Boston, according to interviews with political analysts and insiders.

The effort, dubbed Fresh Slate," is trying to harness the grass-roots energy that has grown out of the frustration with national politics a movement that has produced a new swath of elected officials, including US Representative Ayanna Pressley and unleash it at the local level.

I think its the fact that were reaching a boiling point here in the city, of folks just tired of the same-old, same-old, said Segun Idowu, a Hyde Park resident and director of the Black Economic Council of Massachusetts, an advocacy group for the citys Black community.

Members of the existing ward committees in East Boston and Hyde Park, meanwhile, have teamed up to create their own unity slate, leading to rare local clashes on a ballot that has been overshadowed by the presidential primary.

Voters decide on ward committee members every four years, during a presidential election, and can vote for individual candidates or for a slate of candidates who organize as one team.

Idowu has joined a team of nearly three dozen new candidates looking to represent Ward 18, which includes Hyde Park and parts of Roslindale and Mattapan, saying the party could do more to reflect the neighborhoods values, as opposed to just talking about them.

The team includes local politicians who have already served as flag-bearers for the progressive movement, including City Councilor Michelle Wu, the councils top vote-getter in the last election. She has been mentioned as a potential challenger of Mayor Martin J. Walsh. Shes already a committee member but has joined the new slate of candidates pushing for more diverse representation.

Councilor Ricardo Arroyo, elected to represent the district in November, is also part of the new group. Though his family has been involved in local politics for decades, he believes he would be the first Arroyo to serve on the committee.

Similar campaigns have been mounted in the South End, downtown, and in East Boston.

The effort follows the recent history-making transformation of the City Council from a white, male-dominated panel just a few years ago to a body with its first-ever majority of women and councilors of color. At a time when Boston is grappling with a housing crisis and a transportation mess, the progressive ward candidates say their activism can push city government to act more boldly on reforms.

People are ready to embrace that Boston has shifted, and lets make it shift in more ways, said Rachel Poliner, of the Roslindale and West Roxbury chapter of Progressive Massachusetts. She said the independent growth of the Fresh Slate campaigns in separate neighborhoods shows a citywide desire for change.

Thomas M. Menino, the late mayor, was known to stock ward committees with hand-picked candidates, helping him influence who won local races, such as for district councilors and state representatives.

But newer, progressive candidates have been clashing with the local establishment in recent years, finding committee members to be out of touch.

Arroyo overcame the establishments support of his opponent in the fall election, for instance, and is now the first councilor to represent Hyde Park and not be a member of the committee. Likewise, City Councilor Lydia Edwards shocked the political establishment in East Boston with her first council win just over two years ago. She is also part of the new slate.

Several members of the current committees, including the chairs, welcomed the newfound interest in the committee positions, saying the excitement with local politics is the same reason they got involved. Yet they said they share the same policy visions with the newer progressive candidates. They believe that the new interest is centered more on the frustration with Washington, D.C., politics than on whats happening in Boston.

Anyone who wants to run for office is a good thing, said Rob Consalvo, a former city councilor and Boston Public Schools employee who runs the Ward 18 committee. He said his slate similarly includes locals from every one of the wards neighborhoods, including politicians, business people, and Little League coaches everyone who makes up the civic and social fabric of our community.

I just see it as a sign of people wanting to be involved, be engaged, and have a voice in the representation of their neighborhood, he said.

Claudia Correa, a member of the East Boston ward who also works for the city, agreed, saying the ward committee was the organization she went to when she was looking to get involved in neighborhood politics two decades ago.

Its great to see other peoples platforms its what were advocating for, too, she said. Were advocating for more housing, to have conversations about climate change, to be more diverse when were putting this all together . . . the people on the list represent what were all trying to accomplish here.

But the new candidates cited what they called a history of their committees failing to be truly inclusive of new residents, and often deferring to insiders or an old guard. Several complained that their committees arent active enough, dont promote their agendas, and dont look to excite the party with get-out-the-vote drives or other events.

Brian Gannon, who is behind the new effort in East Boston, identified as Group 2 on the ballot, said he has seen for the first time a movement thats based in the neighborhoods, and not centralized in City Hall.

We just felt [the East Boston committee] wasnt as active and representative of the neighborhood, as inclusive as wed like it to be, and wed like to see more advocacy coming from the ward committee standpoint, Gannon said. Theres a lot of our neighbors that made this a great place to live, and wed be better if we could represent them.

Milton J. Valencia can be reached at milton.valencia@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @miltonvalencia.

Read more:
Progressives target the political sausage-making in Boston - The Boston Globe

Progressive groups in N.J. dont want an open primary just for the presidential race | Opinion – NJ.com

By Emmy Tiderington

Senator Robert Menendez on Thursday called for an open primary for president in New Jersey, in order to insulate the presidential race from any undue influence on New Jerseys other elections.

That influence, of course, would come from a ballot design uncommon in other states: the county line.

This ballot design feature, which usually allows county party officials to anoint their chosen candidates, suddenly has a major flaw.

The law allows for a candidate at the top of a ticket to align with candidates further down the ballot, which normally helps party-approved candidates. Whats different this year? Progressive candidates have emerged as frontrunners for the Democratic presidential nomination. If these candidates were able to align with down ballot candidates of their choosing, strong support for them here in Junes primary could threaten incumbent freeholders, congressional representatives, and even Menendezs fellow senator, Cory Booker.

That is why the party machine, with Menendez as its spokesperson, is calling for insulation. This time around, they just cannot afford to let people associate their preferred presidential candidates with progressives running against local incumbents.

The irony here is that the county line has long insulated New Jersey politicians from important elements of our electoral system. It insulates voters from having to learn what their representatives stand for. It insulates those representatives from having to explain and defend how they govern. It insulates them from debate. It insulates them from the people.

The county line insulates New Jersey from democracy.

So while some, such as Hudson County Democratic Organization Chair Amy DeGise applaud Senator Menendez for calling for an open primary, we choose to call out his hypocrisy. There can be no line for me, but not for thee.

We should not allow the machine to have its lines and columns when they help their candidates, only to get rid of them when they do not. Menendez is right that the line has undue influence -- not just on this election, but on all elections.

If we want truly open primaries, the best choice, for Menendez, DeGise, and Democratic party officials all over the state, is to end the county line once and for all.

Dr. Emmy Tiderington is a committee member of the Hudson County Democratic Organization and a founding member of the Hudson County Progressive Alliance.

Tiderington says this op ed was also supported by more than 160 individuals, including many on county and local Democratic Committees, and the following groups:

The Star-Ledger/NJ.com encourages submissions of opinion. Bookmark NJ.com/Opinion. Follow us on Twitter @NJ_Opinion and on Facebook at NJ.com Opinion. Get the latest news updates right in your inbox. Subscribe to NJ.coms newsletters.

More here:
Progressive groups in N.J. dont want an open primary just for the presidential race | Opinion - NJ.com

Here are 11 of the most popular progressive policies to run on and 5 of the least popular – AlterNet

New polling from the progressive pollster Data for Progress, described in a new piece Monday atVox, points the way forward for Democrats looking to oust President Donald Trump from the White House and enact a liberal policy agenda.

Progressives often argue that their plans are broadly popular with Americans, and that these ideas are only prevented from becoming reality because of an obstinate Republican Party weaponizing racism and misinformation, archaic political institutions that stymie significant efforts at reform, and corruption across the two parties that allows special and corporate interests to undermine the popular will. And there is a fair amount of truth in this idea some progressive idea are remarkably popular, and theres no good reason they havent been implemented yet.

But its not true that a progressive policy wishlist would garner majority support across the board, and anyone hoping to see real, positive change should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their preferred platform. Acknowledging this doesnt mean politicians cant ever run on or enact ideas that lack majority support sometimes leaders have to do what they think is right and take the hit, and some unpopular ideas are necessary but it just reflects the fact that any candidate with a considered electoral strategy should focus on the areas where they have the strongest popular support.

So whats actually popular?

One strength of the Data for Progress polling is that, instead of simply asking respondents how they feel about a specific idea, the firm listed two broad-brush arguments in favor of and against each policy, framed as coming from either Democrats or Republicans. This method should offer a better sense of how voters might respond to an issue in the context of a campaign, where both defenders and critics of a policy will have the chance to speak their minds. If a policy still retains strong support from respondents even after hearing pro and con arguments, we can be more confident that running on the idea makes for good politics.

As Voxs Matt Yglesias noted, under this type of polling, Medicare-for-All is less popular than it may appear in other surveys. Under four different versions of the question, Medicare-for-All scores support around 40 percent or a bit higher, while the opposition was slightly lower. A substantial number of people were undecided.

While defenders of the idea may take the policys slim lead as a victory, its clear that theres a lot of risk involved in an electoral strategy based on the policy. Many people are undecided, and they could be convinced to turn against it. And its important to remember that, because of the structure of the Senate, House of Representatives and the electoral college, a policy that has a slim popular lead in national polls maybe be a net negative in terms of how that support translates into who gets elected at the federal level.

But there is good news for Democrats on health care, which is consistently a central issue for voters. Three central policies that could be done either as a part of or separate from a broader Medicare-for-All push poll quite favorably.

In particular, three ideas to lower prescription drug prices revoking patent rights on the most expensive drugs, government-run manufacturing of generic drugs when there isnt much competition in the market, and a big boost in government funding for pharmaceutical R&D all hit the ball out of the park in terms of popularity, wrote Yglesias.

All three policies have support above 50 percent, and less than 30 percent of the population opposes the plans. Emphasizing these ideas in an election could likely help win over voters without scaring too many people away.

Other popular ideas

Family leave: Asked if they support a policy that would guarantee new parents and other caregivers 12 weeks of paid leave for childbirth or serious medical issues, 60 percent favored it, while only 25 percent opposed it.

100 percent clean energy: Asked whether they favor a plan to transition the economy to 100 percent clean energy by 2045, 51 percent favored it while 30 percent opposed it.

Clean water: Asked whether they favor updating and strengthening the Clean Water Act, 61 percent offered support while only 19 percent said no. As Yglesias noted: The Trump administration has beenrelentlessly hostile to clean water measures, and Democrats have scarcely pushed back. But this polling indicates that tougher clean water rules are very popular, and predictable arguments dont change that.

Corruption: The poll also asked people whether they would like to ban members of Congress and senior government officials from owning stock in companies, and require presidents to sell assets that pose a conflict of interest. Additionally, the policy would ban senior government officials from engaging in lobbying for several years after leaving office.

This policy, which has been a centerpiece of the campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), garnered 51 percent support and only 26 percent opposition.

Interest rate controls on credit cards: This policy would stop credit card companies from charging more than 15 percent interest per year. The poll found 61 percent favored this idea, while 21 percent opposed it.

Ending U.S. support for the war in Yemen: 46 percent of people approved of the idea, while 28 percent opposed it.

Lead paint removal:57 percent of people supported a plan toremove lead paint in all housing, schools and playgrounds, while only 23 percent opposed it.

Marijuana: Respondents were asked whether they support a policy where marijuana possession would be legal for those at least 21 years old. Additionally, the sale of marijuana would be legalized, taxed, and regulated. 59 percent were in favor of this idea, while only 27 percent opposed it.

Unpopular ideas

Decriminalizing unauthorized border crossing:This policy would involve decriminalizing illegal entry into the United States, which means that illegal entry would be treated as a civil, rather than criminal matter and dealt with by the civil court system.

Only 30 percent supported this idea, while 52 percent opposed it.

Cutting military spending: Asked whether they favor cutting back on our military spending for wasteful procurement of weapons systems, 33 percent supported it, while 47 percent opposed it.

Ending cash bail:This policy would shift from the current money-bail-only system to one that allows judges to release most defendants until they have been convicted of a crime. Only 35 percent of people support the idea, while 44 percent oppose it.

Reparations: Asked whether they support cash reparations to the descendants of slaves, only 21 percent said yes, while 58 percent said no.

Sectoral bargaining:Respondents were asked if they supported a policy under which sections of the US economy are unionized as a whole. Only 28 percent said yes, while 47 percent said no.

You can find the questions included in the poll here, and the results here.

Now, to be clear, even if a policy is unpopular, that doesnt mean its a bad idea; it certainly doesnt mean that activists shouldnt try to convince people to support it, or even that politicians shouldnt ever support it or try to argue in its favor. But politics is about winning votes, and politicians wont even be able to pass the good, popular ideas if theyre saddled down with too many unpopular positions. So they should be aware of which parts of their platforms are strengths and which are vulnerabilities and then strategize accordingly.

Link:
Here are 11 of the most popular progressive policies to run on and 5 of the least popular - AlterNet

Erica Smith Sees Herself as a Progressive Idealist Taking on the Party Machine. But the Democratic Senate Primary Isn’t That Simple. – INDY Week

Erica Smith is late.

Her empty chair sits on the stage beside three men hoping to challenge Thom Tillis this fall. National Democrats have pinned their hopes on the one to the far left, Cal Cunningham, a six-foot-tall veteran in a dark gray suit who has, by today, January 25, already raised north of $3 million.

Cunningham looks like a senator, like one youd order from central casting. If you close your eyes and think of the words North Carolina Democrat, something like him probably comes to mind. Hes from a small town. He served in a war. He has a beautiful wife and picture-perfect children. Hes a successful lawyer. He has a winning smile. Hes politically nonthreatening.

Cunningham grips the mic with intention. Though seated, his voice projects loudly to the audience at the Raleigh-Wake Citizens Associations candidate forum, his confidence tangible as he regurgitates soundbites from his by-now-familiar commercials, his tone somewhere between that of a minister and a car salesman.

Together this fall, were going to replace Thom Tillis in the U.S. Senate, he says.

He repeats, nearly verbatim, remarks he gave a few hours earlier at an NAACP forum in Greenborohow when he served as senior trial counsel in Iraq and Afghanistan, he could have never imagined that the countrys greatest threat would come from Washington, D.C.

Erica Smith was late to that forum, too.

Cunningham finishes. Little-known candidate Steve Swenson goes next, offering a forgettable introduction. Hes followed by Mecklenburg County Commissioner Trevor Fuller, who stands to address the crowd. Cunningham appears to take a mental note, wishing hed done the same.

As the candidates spar over the first question from the panel, Erica Smith bursts through the doors in the back of the room and bolts to claim her space on stage. Shes in an elegant navy pantsuit, but her style has a certain joyous imperfection. The state senator, who has represented North Carolinas rural northeastern edge for the last five years, asks to be allowed an introduction.

With the mic in her hand, her energy consumes the room. Unscripted and jarringly earnest, Smith recounts her journey from Boeing engineer to teacher and preacher, from being raised in Eastern North Carolina to working her way up the ranks of the General Assembly.

Smith was the first Democrat to enter the race, back in January 2019. In June and again in August, she made a pitch to the partys powerbrokers in D.C., but she says they were noncommittal. She later learned the DSCC had met with Cunningham in May. He got the groups endorsement in October.

She says she knew the campaign would be an uphill battle. But her entire life has been an uphill battle. She grew up poor and black. She almost died in childbirth. She watched her youngest son die and her second husband get charged with rape.

But shes persevered. Everything shes accomplished, she did herself, through grit and determination and her unassailable brilliance. She was made for the hustleand made from it. At 50, shes learned not to listen to the doubters.

There are plenty of doubters. Objectively, theres good reason to doubt.

At the end of 2019, Cunningham had an 111 cash advantage, which has helped him buy TV ads and amass a 27-point lead in the most recent poll.

Gary Pearce, a former adviser to Governor Jim Hunt, says that to win elections, you need to abide by the two Ms rule: You need a message, and you need moneyand the organization that money buysto get your message out. Smith has the first. She lacks the second.

Particularly Democrats, were idealists, Pearce told me. We like to think money is the root of evil, and it is, in a lot of cases. But its also the only way to get information to people.

Smith isnt listening. Shes focused on the hustleswearing off corporate PAC money, driving from forum to forum on a shoestring budget, taking her message to voters one at a time if she has to. The system is broken, she says, especially for women of color. But it doesnt have to be. Shes determined to prove that big ideas can overcome big money.

Lets be honest here, she says. Black women are never going to have the money that white men have. We dont earn dollar for dollar. We earn 65 cents on the dollar. As a public school educator, I dont have $50,000 to loan to my campaign. I have truly shown what can be done with a reasonable budget a reasonable fundraising plan. If you truly want big money out of politics, then you will back the candidate that is based on the merit and the message.

But Tillis is vulnerable, and this isnt an election Democratic bigwigs are willing to lose by gambling on an ideological purist.

The party, says political consultant Perry Woods, made a raw calculation who they think can best win. Theres a moral imperative. Whats on the line, frankly, this year is whether we are going to continue the great American experiment and save our democracy.

Smiths supporters would counter that, while Cunningham is likable, hes not exciting. Shes the races wildcard, a candidate willing to buck convention. The question is, how far can a candidate go swimming against the tide?

James Calvin Cunningham III grew up in Lexington, population 19,000, the self-proclaimed barbecue capital of the world, where the town hall contains 19th-century brick pits, prominently displayed.

I love my barbecue, Cunningham says, biting into a bacon, egg, and cheese croissant at Cafe Carolina, a few blocks from his house in Cameron Village. Hes sprawled out at a table in the back beside his communications manager. A white three-ring binder packed full of notes and research sits open on the table.

The oldest of three children, Cunningham says he learned to take responsibility at a young age. He grew up active in the church and mowed lawns on the weekends to save up for his first guitar. He attended Vanderbilt University before transferring to the UNC-Chapel Hill, where he studied political science and philosophy. He graduated in 1996, then earned his law degree from UNC School of Law.

Without missing a beat, Cunningham launched into his political career. In 2000, he ran for the General Assembly at age 27, and won, but only served one term before redistricting turned his rural district, south of Winston-Salem, red.

After 9/11, Cunningham joined the army reserves. In 2007, he shipped out to Iraq to serve as a prosecutor, working with the Judge Advocate Generals office to weed out misconduct among military contractors. For that work, Cunningham was awarded the Bronze Star and General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award. He carried a gun, but he never fired it at an enemy. For exercise, he ran around the base in Baghdad. Time moved slowly.

In 2010, he returned to the Middle East to serve a second tour in Afghanistan, a country he describes as even more desolate and primitive. At least in Iraq, he says, there was a McDonalds.

(Of North Carolinas major cities, Cunningham is most likely to meet resistance in Durham. In 2013, he represented a controversial luxury housing development known as 751 South. The city and county governments tried to block it. Cunningham, however, leaned on his relationship with future House Speaker Tim Moorea law school friendto get the General Assembly to force the city to provide water and sewer to the project.)

Cunninghams pitch to Democrats is straightforward: He can beat Thom Tillis, a former state House speaker who narrowly defeated Senator Kay Hagan six years ago, but who is now one of the least popular incumbents in the country. Tillis ran promising to be an independent voice, but hes bound himself to President Trump, hoping the presidents coattails are long enough to pull him over the finish line.

Tilliss inevitable efforts to paint his opponent as a wild-eyed socialist wont work on him, Cunningham says, no matter whos atop the Democratic ticket.

Hes more moderate than Erica Smith on issues like health care and the climate crisis. He wants a public option, not Medicare for All. Hes been an environmental lawyer, but he hasnt signed on to the Green New Deal. He voted for Pete Buttigiega fellow veterannot Bernie Sanders. Hell appeal to the suburbs, not play to the base. Hes not running to spark a revolution but to restore dignity.

Today, he tells me, is his daughters 18th birthday (yes, shes registered to vote), and shes responsible for his decision to run for officelieutenant governor at first, then U.S. Senate. One morning last year, as the family was getting ready for school, she heard someone on television talking about one of Trumps late-night Twitter rants. Suddenly, his normally reserved daughter pointed at the TV: So what are you gonna do about it, Dad?

Cunningham tells this story a lot. He tells a lot of his stories a lot. Theres nothing Cunningham tells me that he hasnt told thousands of potential voters already (save, perhaps, for an admission that he loves the Grateful Dead). He is careful and disciplined. He knows the script and he sticks to it.

Hes also very intelligent and very organized. And his campaign is a well-oiled machine.

While we finish breakfast, a gaggle of staffers is already driving to Greensboro, where Cunningham would address the NAACP in a few hours. We leave in time to arrive early.

His communications manager takes the wheel of a silver Jeep Compass, and Cunningham assumes the front seat. I ask questions to the back of his head. He leafs through the white three-ring binder.

I ask if he color-coordinatesall of his binders.

No, he replies. His binders are always white. I ask why.

White is for the good guys. Ive never rethought it.

Erica Smith is late.

Her black and gray poncho is slung over the stall door of the Sheetz bathroom. She shuffles inside, changing into evening wear.

I change in gas stations all the time, she says.

Smith has no gaggle of advance staff, no communications manager to drive her, no staff photographer snapping pictures everywhere she goes, no white three-ring binders. Her campaign is often her and her identical twin, Alicia, who hates politics but loves her sister, as well as a campaign manager and some volunteers who may or may not show up when needed. Shes always rushing. Theres always chaos. TodayFebruary 8is no different.

We were supposed to head to Alicias house in Durham so Smith could change before driving to Charlotte, where shell deliver a keynote to the nations second-oldest black sorority, Delta Sigma Theta. But we lingered too long at the HKonJ rally in Raleigh, so the Sheetz off Miami Boulevard will have to do.

Smiths car, a red Toyota Venza hatchback, is a mobile closet, full of dress pants, blouses, dresses, and shoes. Alicia rummages through the trunk as Smith emerges from the gas station in a sparkly red dress suit and bright blue sneakers. Smith flings stilettos onto the pavement as she puts mismatched heels on her stockinged feet and asks which pair matches the dress.

This is real, people, Smith laughs. A real democracy.

They go with taupe.

Alicia and Erica were born in Fort Bragg to a military family and moved to the Philippines and then Texas before eventually settling on a farm in Gaston, where the girls spent summers waking up in the dark to pick cucumbers for the farmers market. The family wasnt well off. They needed the money.

After high school, Erica and Alicia attended North Carolina A&T State University and earned engineering degrees. Erica moved to Seattle to work for Boeing after graduation, and four years later followed her husband to Washington, D.C., where she got a job with the U.S. Patent Office.

She married, had two children, and divorced, moving back to Gaston to care for her ailing father while continuing to commute several hours a day to the patent office. Sick of the commute, she started teaching math in Virginia public schools. She married and divorced again. She earned a masters degree in divinity from Howard University and got ordained. Following her first divorce, Smith ventured into politics. In 2006, she unsuccessfully ran for the school board in Northampton County, then ran again and won two years later. Shed been mapping out her next stepthe state Senatesince 2005, but really, it had been a dream since childhood.

In 2014, she made her move, challenging Democratic incumbent Clark Jenkins in the primary. She wonby eight points*. Despite working in a Republican supermajority, she was named Freshman Senator of the Year in 2016.

She started thinking about moving up again. She set her eyes on the U.S. Senate.

It hasnt been a smooth ride.

During her first year in the legislature, her second husband, Maud Ingram, was indicted on rape charges.

Smith doesnt like to talk about itout of respect for the victims, she says. When I ask how it affected her, she deflects.

We kept our eyes focused on our work and the community we serve and raising my family and getting us through that crisis, Smith says. I never paused to think about how I feel and how it affects me because the priority is the other people who were impacted by this, whose lives were devastated.

She did the only thing she knew how to do: She kept going. Shed done it before when shed met tragedy.

During her third pregnancy, Smith suffered from hypertension. At the end of her second trimester, tests showed the baby was in distress. Her doctors asked her who she wanted to saveher or her baby.

At 37, Smith decided she was prepared to die.

Despite the odds, Elias was born at 24 weeks, weighing just over one pound. But he suffered a cranial bleed and had to be given a tracheostomy due to his prematurity. And so began Smiths agonizing years-long battle with her insurance company, which refused to cover a component for Eliass trach tube and initially denied her request for an in-home aide.

It only ended when Elias died in 2012 at the age of five.

But Smith didnt give in to anger or sadness.

There are people all over this nation who go through worse, and every day they have to fight their way to get up. I have always had a strong support system and a positive outlook on life, Smith says. Its not what happens to you, its how you respond and how you keep moving forward.

Smith is funny and down to earth, smart and quirky. She looks you in the eyes and makes you feel seen.

There was a fundraiser scheduled for after her speech in Charlotte, but Smith hears theres a power outage, so she cancels it. Raising money isnt her top priority, she says.

As I write this, Smith says shes raised $275,000, mostly from small donors, $5 or $10 at a time.

Were already 20 minutes late to the sorority event when snow starts to speckle the windshield. Alicia starts to worry. Erica puts on headphones and meditates, her pre-speech ritual.

The chaos never fazes her.

Cunningham wasnt Chuck Schumers first choice. Or second, or third.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee courted state Senator Jeff Jackson, former state Senator Eric Mansfield, and former Treasurer Janet Cowell before it glanced in Cunninghams direction. Jackson would later say he turned the party down because he didnt want to spend 16 months in a windowless basement dialing donors for money to run attack ads on Tillis.

To hear Cunningham tell it, the DSCC didnt recruit him at all. In the spring of 2019, he was traveling the state, campaigning for lieutenant governor. But the people he met asked him to take on Tillis instead.

Every time I was having a conversation, and invariably, and I can say this with almost no exception: Why arent you offering to run against Thom Tillis? It was over and over and over again, Cunningham says. It just took off, and it made sense, and it was never about anyone else.

Like so much of what Cunningham says, this story has a canned, almost robotic quality to it.

But no matter whose idea it was, to party officials running out of options, Cunninghamand the $500,000 hed already raised (including $200,000 hed loaned himself)was increasingly attractive. The DSCC knew him, too. The party had backed him in 2010, when he challenged Elaine Marshall in a messy Senate primary.

Marshall came out nine points ahead but didnt secure a majority. Cunningham called for a runoff. Marshall crushed him, winning by 20. But she had to spend time and money doing ittime and money that could have gone toward battling Richard Burr, to whom the now-secretary of state lost handily.

Marshall got no help from the DSCC.

Thomas Mills is still salty about that.

I have a lot of resentments against them, says Mills, a Democratic consultant who ran Marshalls campaign. Had [the DSCC] not pushed the primary, Elaine may have had a lot more money, and they may have been putting more money into the race behind us.

In June, Cunningham announced that he was abandoning his lieutenant governor campaign to run for Senate. By July, it was clear the party was in his corner. Out-of-state donations poured in; donors maxed out. In October, the DSCC made it official, formally endorsing Cunninghams campaign.

Smith issued a blistering response: This endorsement cuts to the integrity and ethics of this election. If the DSCC has been involved all along, then it should disclose the details of its prior involvement to the voters of North Carolina. Ultimately, the voters of North Carolina will decide who their next United States Senator will beNOT a handful of DC politicians making backroom deals in windowless basements.

The DSCC, Smith says, has a history of not endorsing black candidates and not backing women. Progressives have sharply criticized the partys involvement. In a state that, not counting judicial races, has only elected one black person to a statewide position, the partys decision couldnt help but be seen through a racial prism. Indeed, earlier this month, civil rights leader the Reverend William J. Barber II blasted the party on Twitter for picking a candidate in the primary.

But Mills thinks the DSCC was simply being pragmatic: This is a race Democrats need to win to take back the Senate. And they looked at Smith and saw a campaignand a candidatethat wasnt ready for primetime.

Three months after Smith entered the race in January 2019, shed raised just $21,000. To the DSCC, thats a red flag; it costs about $40,000 a month to run a large-scale statewide political operation.

The only reason to get into a race that early is to clear the field, Mills says. And you do that showing you can raise the money and you can put together the organization.

Had she done those things, she would have been a strong contender. To win statewide, Democrats need high African American turnout and for suburban women to break their way. With the right message, Smith could likely deliver both.

You could make an argument, strongly, that Erica would be better on the ticket to turn out votes, Woods says. More minorities and low-information voters may be more willing to show up to vote for Erica than for Cal.

But, he adds, Erica has not demonstrated the ability to raise the money its going to take. Its sad, but its where we are.

In February, TV ads went up all over the state praising Smith for her commitment to the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, spliced with a picture of progressive darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She was the real deal, the black narrator said, the races only proven progressive.

But the ads didnt come from the Smith campaign. Instead, they came from a brand-new PAC called Faith and Power, which, media outlets quickly learned, had ties to the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee.

Last week, The Hill reported that Faith and Power was funded by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells super PAC.

Smith disavowed the ads, but it didnt matter. The message, according to Cunningham, was clear: Tillis was afraid of him, so Republicans were trying to prop up a weaker adversary.

It probably illustrates the stakesthat they see that Thom Tillis is extraordinarily weak, very vulnerable, and that their best play is to cause mischief, Cunningham says. Were wise to it, and were on alert that there will be more to come.

In response, Cunningham upped his own ad buy. He already has PACs working on his behalf: The Vote Vets Action Fund has shelled out more than $6 million so far, while Carolina Blue has spent $1.1 million promoting Cunningham.

He has little reason to be concerned: The most recent poll, from Public Policy Polling, has him besting Smith 4518.

Somehow, we arrive at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Charlotte at precisely 2:00 p.m.late, but in time for Smith to give her keynote address to Delta Sigma Theta. As we enter the banquet hall, were greeted by a sea of crimson dresses. As frenzied as the day has been, everything worked out. The same was true with the RWCA event: She came late, but she got the groups endorsement.

This sort of serendipity lends itself to faith, and Smith has that in abundance. Her speech is a rousing sermon on the urgency of the moment. Shes sick of waiting for the patriarchy to give her the green light. Rosa Parks didnt wait. Shirley Chisholm didnt wait.

Erica Smith isnt going to wait.

Shes bitter at the DSCCbitter that the party interfered, that party elites tried to erase her, that they chose a white man over a black woman. But damned if shes going to let that stop her. Shes never listened to doubters before. Shes not going to start now.

We cannot wait another day, Smith tells the crowd. Until we have a voice that looks like us, understands us, has been through our struggles, been through our troubles, we dont need to wait another day!

Continued here:
Erica Smith Sees Herself as a Progressive Idealist Taking on the Party Machine. But the Democratic Senate Primary Isn't That Simple. - INDY Week