Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Letter: Mike Stenhouse: Progressives deny the reality of their bad policies – The Providence Journal

Doug Halls July 27 Commentary piece (News of R.I.'s demise exaggerated) criticized me and the Rhode Island Center for Freedom & Prosperity, challenging our contention that it is unacceptable that Rhode Island should rank a dismal 45th in the broadest national research ever conducted on family well-being. Mr. Hall incorrectly stated that this index did not include a family income metric. It does.

Progressives like Mr. Hall believe that compassion should be measured by how many people are enrolled in government assistance programs, surviving at some arbitrarily defined meager level of subsistence. Our center believes that a more appropriate measure is how many families remain together, thrive and are empowered to improve their own quality of life via more and better jobs created by more and better companies.

The sad truth is that progressive policies have driven away more than 80,000 Rhode Islanders in recent years, yet pro-poverty advocates want even more progressive policies that seize wealth from those who have earned it and hand it over it to those who they want to be dependent on government.

Progressives can keep living in their land of make-believe, denying the harm of their policies on Ocean State families. Our center is not so naive and will continue to advocate for policies that encourage work and marriage.

Mike Stenhouse

Cranston

The writer is CEO of the Rhode Island Center for Freedom & Prosperity.

See original here:
Letter: Mike Stenhouse: Progressives deny the reality of their bad policies - The Providence Journal

Wary and weary, progressives celebrate victory over ACA repeal … – Washington Post

Ben Wikler learned the Affordable Care Acts fate from a text message. The Washington director of MoveOn.org, who had led nearly daily rallies outside the Capitol to stop repeal, was five hours into the final protest when a colleague passed him her phone, buzzing with texts.

Pence not in chair, read one text. Wikler read it to the 300 protesters gathered around him, in a circle, who had been taking turns giving speeches. Murkowski is a no. Let me confirm that. Murkowski is a no. Then: McCain is a no.

Wikler read the text out loud. It was like fireworks going off, he said in an interview. Everyone started chanting U-S-A. Strangers were hugging.

One day later, Wikler and a sizable army of activists were still dazed, and a little nervous. The anti-Trump resistance movement, which has repeatedly watched the repeal effort die and be miraculously reborn, looked at the Senate vote as a genuine victory, with lessons about how to keep blocking the Republican agenda.

This is a truly historic victory and a demonstration of constituent power, said Ezra Levin, a former congressional staffer who co-founded the Indivisible project of grass-roots activist groups. We should celebrate ... [but] Trumpcare is not dead. Do not forget that in the House, [Speaker Paul D.] Ryan declared defeat, and then six weeks later they passed it.

Six months earlier, when new and old liberal groups first organized against the Trump administration, it was unclear whether they could cohere and avoid plunging into the infighting that typically follows electoral defeat. President Trump had full command of the news cycle; Republicans, who had passed multiple ACA repeal bills, insisted that they had a plan to scrub the act off the books.

Activists, who on Friday were still surprised by their victory, credited a number of factors for the turnaround. First, to their surprise, the conservative movement that had so effectively toxified the ACA for voters seemed to phone it in during the repeal fight. Pro-repeal organizations such as the Club for Growth ran TV ads to urge House members along, but faded during the Senate battle. The Club for Growths biggest contribution, a team-up with the Tea Party Patriots, was a little-seen website that attacked skeptical Republicans as traitors. In the end, no TV ads were run to support the Senates version of repeal, and no activism or rallies in favor of repeal was seen by any senator.

I never had any of that in my state, a state [Trump] won bigger than any other state in the nation, said Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.). Even the people who voted for Trump, they were benefiting from the law. They got a Medicaid expansion. They got subsidies. The people who were harmed by it because they made too much money to get subsidies: I want to help them. They have a right to be upset. But they were not an organized force like the ones who threw it out.

The Republican decision to craft a conservative bill that only needed intraparty support also put the activists on the same side as health insurance groups and AARP, which activated their own networks to oppose repeal.

But the critical mass of opposition came from liberal groups that had never been so threatened or so organized. MoveOn, battle-hardened by the effort to prevent (and then end) the war in Iraq, ran an aggressive protest and media campaign, including tens of thousands of calls to congressional offices and a series of rallies in swing states that featured Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

They were matched by tens of thousands of more calls from a constellation of groups and by protests organized by everything from ADAPT, a disability rights organization, to the Democratic Socialists of America. Planned Parenthood, which was threatened with zeroed-out federal funding if repeal succeeded, organized nationally and hyper-locally, with key states quickly growing their activist networks.

In Maine, whose Republican senator, Susan Collins, became a reliable vote against repeal, Planned Parenthood began working against repeal immediately after the 2016 election. According to Nicole Clegg, vice president for public policy at Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, the local chapter signed up 300 new activists in the week after Trumps victory.

I dont think we ever took the foot off the pedal, she said.

A similar effort took place in Alaska, where another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski, declared in February that she would oppose defunding of Planned Parenthood. She eventually voted to oppose repeal. Activists in Alaska perfected a model that became universal by July protest after protest in the offices of Republicans who might vote for repeal, but steady phone calls and shows of support for Republicans who might vote no. (On Friday afternoon, Planned Parenthood sent superhero capes to the offices of no-voters.)

Starting Friday morning, all of the activist groups began organizing a next step steady action to assure legislators that any revival of the repeal push would spark a backlash. A national day of health-care action was already planned for Saturday, so little had be changed.

In the meantime, MoveOn and its allies faced an unexpected problem: accusations of being sore winners. Some of the first coverage of the Capitol protest appeared on Fox and Friends, reportedly the presidents favorite show, in a segment shaming Democratic senators for taking selfies at Wiklers rally. (Congratulations, the healthy people are paying for the sick people, said co-host Brian Kilmeade.)

But Democrats, who repeatedly praised activists for making the repeal push untenable, were happy to celebrate the rally. On Friday morning, dozens of Democratic candidates at a training session sponsored by a progressive group watched a video that Sen. Elizabeth Warrens staff had recorded at the protest. It began with the senator speed-walking away from the vote, then marching, in the witching-hour darkness, toward Wikler and his microphone.

The nightmare is over, said Warren (D-Mass.). The 15 million people who were going to lose their health-care coverage can sleep a little better tonight.

On Facebook, Warrens video of the rally was watched nearly 1million times.

Read more at PowerPost

More here:
Wary and weary, progressives celebrate victory over ACA repeal ... - Washington Post

House Progressives Call on Members of Congress to Sign Single … – Common Dreams


Common Dreams
House Progressives Call on Members of Congress to Sign Single ...
Common Dreams
Support for a single payer healthcare system has grown in recent years, with 33 percent of Americans supporting the plan last month. (Photo: National Nurses ...

and more »

Read more:
House Progressives Call on Members of Congress to Sign Single ... - Common Dreams

The Danger of Progressives’ Inhumanity to the Humanities – WSJ – Wall Street Journal (subscription)


Wall Street Journal (subscription)
The Danger of Progressives' Inhumanity to the Humanities - WSJ
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Science moves forward; literature doesn'tand when it tries, the results can be monstrous.

and more »

Go here to see the original:
The Danger of Progressives' Inhumanity to the Humanities - WSJ - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

‘Socialist’ is a more accurate description of today’s Democratic base. – National Review

Over and over again, political pundits and journalists make constant reference to the Democrats progressive base. Without heavy progressive turnout, we are told, the House wont flip in 2018 and Democrats will have to endure the most painful, humiliating victory Tweetstorm from President Trump.

This is likely true, but it raises an important question: What exactly is a progressive at this point?

The group of voters currently holding Democratic leaders (and lets face it, donors) hostage has made it clear that the partys next nominee for president must adopt certain policies, such as single-payer health care and a nationwide $15 minimum wage, to secure their support. Such policies will likely be sold by the press and Democratic leaders as a Strong Progressive Agenda, or something similar.

Yet such a description is vague at best and deceptive at worst. After all, Senator Bernie Sanders mainstreamed many of these policies in last years Democratic primary campaign, not as a Democrat but as an Independent who proudly calls himself a democratic socialist. Despite his outsider status, Sanders still received over 43 percent of the votes cast in his campaign against Hillary Clinton. And according to a poll done in 2016 by American Action Network, nearly 60 percent of Democratic primary voters viewed socialism as having a positive impact on society.

So one must ask why so many insist on using an outmoded nicety like progressive. While the term was originally used to describe those who supported a more active federal government and expansive welfare state in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, old-school progressives like Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson didnt advocate for government control of the means of production, as many socialists do today. Setting aside whether or not their policies of trust busting or expanding the role of the executive branch produced desirable outcomes, neither of these men sought to fundamentally dismantle the nations market economy.

Sanders was asked in an interview with The Nation in 2015 about whether a socialist could be president. He responded that he wasnt afraid of the word and had no problem defending its core tenets. So why are so many other people?

The answer likely has to do with marketing. Progressive remains a nebulous enough term that the average voter wont make any immediate historical connections to the phrase; the historical failures of socialism, meanwhile, are well documented. The root of the word progress has generally positive connotations for voters. Thus when presented with a progressive policy, voters will think of an improved future, rather than some sort of rigid ideology. (Simple, yes. But, then, most sales pitches are.)

Of course none of this makes the efforts by Democratic-party officials and their allies in the media to shy away from the S word any less disingenuous. When so many members of the party openly celebrate socialism and support socialist candidates, using any other word to describe this political constituency is an act of absurdity.

Perhaps in an earlier time when the country was less divided politically and Americans were more suspicious of liberal welfare programs, a rebranding was necessary. Now, on the heels of a primary campaign in which Democrats nearly nominated a socialist for president, its safe to say that that moment has passed.

Its time to move on as a society and retire progressive. Socialist might seem just as outdated, but if youre worried about how people might judge you, perhaps you should reconsider your beliefs.

Joe Simonson writes about politics and culture.

View post:
'Socialist' is a more accurate description of today's Democratic base. - National Review