Mediaboss Marketing

Katie Van Develde, senior-meteorology

Political protesting is not unfamiliar to Katie Van Develdes family in the 1970s, her dad took to the streets to protest the war in Vietnam. With older siblings who were also politically active, Van Develde said even as a kid she had an interest.

The secretary of College Progressives said the values Trump promotes are contradictory to the ones she was raised with in her liberal household growing up.

He brings out a lot of negativity you dont want to see, she said, and he doesnt value all people.

After the Womens March on Washington, however, Van Develde said the organizations work is not over. She said College Progressives are working to participate in more discourse and debates with other organizations because, we need to learn how to listen to each other, were all people and have to respect each other.

During his time at Penn State, Samuel Chelemer involved himself in politics as president of the political science association. However, traveling to the march was the first time he physically was taking a stand for political causes he believes in.

He said the last three months were a wakeup call for not only the country, but for himself. Respect for women, he said, was one of the biggest issues motivating him to become active.

I have women in my life I care about, and for the first time I did something other than writing a letter, he said. I have three nieces, older sisters and sexual assault survivors in the family. I dont know how I would to explain this election to my nieces the president is someone youre supposed to look up to, and I wouldnt want to leave them in a room alone with him.

Just because Chelemer graduated didnt stop him from returning to his Penn State roots to protest.

I have a pen and pencil, congressmen and women to write to and a checkbook, he said. Im not going to sit back and be quiet.

Anthony Zarzycki fell asleep on election night in 2008 before the results were announced. But the sound of Barak Obama supporters cheering and celebrating on TV woke him up and instantly drew him in. He said that moment was like gravity hitting him, and he knew history was changing.

His upbringing in the rural Poconos didnt expose him to politics, and it wasnt until he got to Penn State that he saw what political opportunities existed.

Opportunities such as serving as secretary of Students for Sanders, a member of NextGen Climate Change and a volunteer with the Clinton campaign in the fall.

For the better part of 2016 Zarzycki dedicated his time working toward the election.

The election in which his dad, granddad and uncle voted for Donald Trump.

Zarzycki said his family had an ongoing joke about their different political differences. Every time he would come home from school he would stick a Hillary Clinton sign in the front lawn, and the next time he came home his would dad find another reason to remove it.

Zarzycki laughed at this memory, but became serious when talking about where he sees the progressive movement going.

Trump ran on a populist message, and I hope this shows him that most people dont think thats the way to make America great, he said. So many people got energized by Bernie Sanders, and we need to invigorate and energize the people to bring back communication. Democracy cant work without the people.

Marco Ciappettas first foray into political activism was just a few months ago. It was the Tuesday after Election Day when he joined the several hundred students, faculty and community members that gathered on Old Main lawn for the Not my President protest. An experience which Ciapetta called nerve wracking, as he knew that form of protesting would be happening a lot more during the Trump administration.

A few months later when Ciappetta learned the College Progressives were going to the Womens March on Washington, he said he never felt such a strong need to participate in something.

Ive always been more empathetic, but that escalated in an international relations class when we learned about feminism, he said. Women, historically, have been the most oppressed and I truly believe men and women are equal.

Vladmir Putin is at the hot seat of Americas focus right now, but the Russian leader has long impacted Daria Sipiginas view of politics.

Sipigina is a masters student originally from the Ukraine a country that experienced a political revolution of its own in 2013. Sipigina said Ukraines revolution is similar to the current state of American politics, calling Donald Trumps populistic messages concerning.

Though shes an international student and didnt vote in the election, Sipigina said she felt compelled to protest because of Trumps relationship with Putin the leader who annexed Crimea and forced her native country into revolution. Thats why, she said, she wrote on her sign Trump Putin16 Make Tyranny Great Again.

Only through many deaths we understood how important a vote can be, she said. Our citizens are being killed. Americans should try to value their vote its taken for granted here and people dont realize how hard it is in some countries.

During her senior year of high school, classmates stuck Donald Trump stickers on Rylie Coopers car. In the red county of Juniata, Pa., Coopers liberal political views stuck out among the sea of the Make America Great Again hats that filled her schools hallway.

My dads a diehard democrat and taught me you didnt have to think like everyone else did, she said.

Cooper initially started as a Bernie Sanders supporter, and even made the visit to Penn State her senior year when he spoke in Rec Hall.

But from the moment Cooper came to campus as a student, she immediately joined the College Progressives. Even though she was always politically outspoken, she said the organization made her more outspoken about the issues shes most concerned with.

As a member of the LGBT community who lives with a chronic illness and is planning to study environmental sciences, her biggest concern are LGBT rights, healthcare and climate change.

At the march, Cooper found herself among likeminded women passionate about the same issues she is.

You dont need to study political science to be an activist, she said.

Despite not seeing the outcome of the presidential election that she wanted, president of College Democrats Veronica Weyhrauch has big plans for her organization going forward.

We have to make sure were not just showing up to a march on one day of the year, she said. Every day we need to focus on these issues.

Hearing speakers such as Gloria Steinem and Mothers of the Movement gave her that inspiration to keep that focus going the rest of the semester, she said.

College Democrats plans include interacting with local elected officials and launching a campus informational campaign on immigration.

A woman holds a sign above her head during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman stands on top of a rock and holds a sign in protest of the inauguration of Donald Trump during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Two men hold signs of Trump kissing Putin during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A group of people dance together as Madonna performs on stage during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Women hold signs during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman holds a sign during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman holds a sign ontop of a porta potty during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of protesters during the Womens March on Washington at the U.S. Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

The metro station is filled with people after the Womens March on Washington in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

The metro station is filled with people after the Womens March on Washington in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of supporters participated in the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman has Trumps Hate drawn on her face during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman wears a pink mask during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Protesters raise their fists in the air during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of protesters participate in the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman holds a sign above her head during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman stands on top of a rock and holds a sign in protest of the inauguration of Donald Trump during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Two men hold signs of Trump kissing Putin during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A group of people dance together as Madonna performs on stage during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Women hold signs during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman holds a sign during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman holds a sign ontop of a porta potty during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of protesters during the Womens March on Washington at the U.S. Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

The metro station is filled with people after the Womens March on Washington in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

The metro station is filled with people after the Womens March on Washington in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of supporters participated in the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman has Trumps Hate drawn on her face during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A woman wears a pink mask during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Protesters raise their fists in the air during the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

A huge turnout of protesters participate in the Womens March on Washington at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., a day after the inauguration of Donald Trump on Saturday, Jan. 21, 2017.

Original post:
Penn State's College Progressives and Democrats 'march on Washington,' reflect on President Trump - The Daily Collegian Online

The handwringing is unprecedented. While Democrats have always expressed outsized fears about what Republicans will do when in power, their angst over the 2016 election has now lasted two months and shows no sign of waning. Meryl Streep (a great actress, contrary to Donald Trumps tweet) spoke and emoted for millions of still-suffering Democrats when she attacked Trump at the Golden Globe Awards last Sunday.

That a movie star would take the opportunity of a nationally televised Hollywood extravaganza to express her political views is not surprising.

But its not just the self-anointed policy experts of Hollywood who are anticipating the worst.

Two groups RISE When We Fall and Lawyers for Good Government are organizing a conference they are calling Rise Above for two days after Trumps inauguration.

Dozens of cities and universities have declared themselves sanctuaries from the expected constitutional abuses of the Trump administration.

It all seems a bit over-the-top and premature. Donald Trump is not yet the president, and the tea leaves of his ideologically varied nominations thus far are difficult to read. Yet millions of Americans are expecting the worst.

Worry about Trump is understandable. He has offered very few specifics of what he intends to do and his Twitter addiction is more than unorthodox. But anticipating a tidal wave of human suffering and rights violations presumes Trump to be truly evil and reflects an extreme lack of confidence in the constitutional structure that has served our nation reasonably well for over two centuries. Few presidents in the nations history have not been frustrated by the constraints of the Constitution. Why are so many convinced that Trump will avoid those same frustrations?

But perhaps progressives do have reason to be anxious. To the extent their concerns are legitimate, it has more to do with historic erosions of constitutional constraints than with the incoming occupant of the White House.

Since the New Deal, the powers of the federal government have steadily expanded, as have the powers of the president. Progressives who have relied on expansions of federal authority to achieve most of their policy goals should not be surprised that the vast regulatory regime they created might one day be employed to achieve ends they object to. Power is indifferent to the ambitions of those who wield it.

The greatest angst has been in response to the nominees for the departments of Education (Betsy DeVos), Health and Human Services (Tom Price), Labor (Andrew Puzder), Commerce (Wilbur Ross) and the Environmental Protection Agency (Scott Pruitt). These are the agencies that have been doing the progressives bidding for decades. Now there is a real risk they will be doing the bidding of those who think differently.

As good an explanation as any for Trumps surprising victory is that Democrats finally overreached. Now they worry that the powers they created will be used to achieve ends they reject.

To their credit, Democrats are discovering the merits of federalism and the separation of powers. Sanctuary cities and defiant blue states are asserting that popular sovereignty will protect them from Trump. But like Republicans before them who have embraced big government for their own purposes, Democrats may be too late to the party.

Over a century, the federal government has grown into a behemoth that even the master of the deal may not be able to undo. Draining the swamp may be a challenge beyond the capacities of mere mortals. If it turns out a lot of damage is done in the effort, progressives will have only themselves to blame. They set us on the path to federal dominance of just about everything.

We should all hope it is not a one-way path that the swamp can be drained.

(James Huffman (huffman@lclark.edu) is dean emeritus at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Ore. He wrote this for InsideSources.com .)

Read more here:
Handwringing among the progressives - Newnan Times-Herald

Protesters at the Womens March in Washington, D.C., show their support for the Indivisible Trump resistance movement. (via Indivisible)

Now that Donald Trump has been inaugurated, resistance is unavoidable. Just look at the reports of riots and protests filling your news feeds.

But preventing Congress from carrying out Trumps agenda takes more than vocalized disapproval and demonstrations. To explain what works, a group of progressivesincluding former Democratic congressional staff members and those who have worked on Capitol Hillcreated Indivisible, a guide to effective resistance that has been downloaded by more than half a million people in one month.

How would they know how to slow down federal policymaking? Theyve seen it all firsthand: In the early days of the Obama administration, these two dozen staffers could barely carry out daily tasks in their congressional offices as tea party adherents brought any action to a crawl by, in their words, scaring congressional Democrats and keeping Republicans honest.

The tea partys success was a disaster for President Obamas agenda and for our country, but that success should give us hope today, three former staffers wrote in a New York Times op-ed piece. It proved the power that local, defensive organizing can have.

Seven years later, these now-former staffers are arguing that progressives should look to replicate the ultraconservative movements defensive strategy. By organizing small grass-roots groups that pledge to hold their local districts representatives accountable to their constituentsas the tea party did, they noteprogressives have a chance to prevent Congress from passing agendas that undermine democracy.

Last month, the staffers compiled their collective knowledge of how congressional representatives offices work into a publicly accessible Google document that suggests actions aimed at effectively stiffening Democratic spines and weakening pro-Trump Republican resolve.

Not long afterward, the page crashed as secret progressive Facebook groups such as Pantsuit Nation and verified Twitter accounts shared the document across the web. Responding to the high demand, the authors then created an official website for the 25-page guide, now called Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda.

The document, which can be read, downloaded and printed in English and Spanish on the Indivisible website, states: Our goal is to provide practical understanding of how your [members of Congress] think, and how you can demonstrate to them the depth and power of the opposition to Donald Trump and Republican congressional overreach.

It goes on to advise progressives on the most effective forms of resistance. This includes taking advantage of the fact that their members of Congress (MoC) are first and foremost beholden to their constituents.

Every single member of Congress is very focused on that goal of convincing their constituents that they are representing them in Congress, which is why relatively small numbers of constituents can really change the behavior of members of Congress, said Ezra Levin, a co-author of the guide and former policy adviser to U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas.

Conversely, the guide warns, reaching out to MoCs who dont represent you is a waste of time. Rep. Paul Ryan, for example, is not likely to respond to anyone outside his congressional district in Wisconsin.

Resistance on the local level can and will make an impact on a national level, the authors argue, and this isnt the time to rely on congressional members like U.S. Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., to hold Trump accountable. All it takes is convincing your representative that it is not in his or her best interest to allow the GOP-led Congress to get away with following through on Republican promises that include ending Medicare, creating a Muslim registry and privatizing public schools. If representatives go against their most passionate constituents interests, their re-election is in jeopardy, the authors write.

Federal policy change in the next four years doesnt depend on Mr. Trump but on whether our representatives support or oppose him, the guide says. And through local pressure, we have the power to shape what they consider possible.

Resistance should be easier with a petty tyrant named Trump than with the popular president with a mandate for change and a supermajority in Congress that the tea party faced, according to the guides authors. They write: Unlike President Obama Trump has no mandate, a slim congressional majority and a slew of brewing scandals. Our incoming president is a weak president, and he can be beat.

However, as they draw inspiration from the tea party, the authors make sure to differentiate themselves from petty scare tactics.

Their [the Trump campaigns] ideas were wrong, cruel, and tinged with racismand they won, they write. Resistance to Trump would be built on the values of inclusion, tolerance, and fairness.

In an interview with Truthdig, Indivisible co-author Angel Padilla, a former staffer for U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., emphasized that nothing in the guide is groundbreaking. It simply tapped into an already existing network of people who want to resist Trump but dont know how.

Indivisible is kind of the secret sauce that explains what is bubbling up as what may be the start of the anti-Trump movement, MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow explained in a segment on her eponymous show.

She continued: This has not really been cooking openly, in the Beltway media and on cable TV news, and in places we usually look for news about politics. It really has been cooking online, where it has taken off.

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Excerpt from:
KiMi Robinson: 'Indivisible' Guide Teaches Progressives How to ... - Truthdig

Buckle up, friends. Most Americans are about to be detoured onto a rough and rocky back road called Trump Way. The autocratic tycoon was unabashed on the campaign trail in promising that his victory would ensure millions of people a dire futurethat included mass deportations of immigrants, refugee bans and frontal assaults on women.

But theyre not the only ominous prospects. It will surprise many of the working stiffs who voted for the blustery billionaire to learn something that he didnt communicate in his hectoring, truth-telling speeches: His little-discussed economic agenda is filled with provisions that would permit 1 percenters to travel more luxuriously than ever in the smooth, fast lanes of life, while the middle class and the poor are flagged onto Trump Way for a hairy, four-year ride of even more downward mobility. The proposed package includes the following:

1. Immediately seizing control of the National Labor Relations Board, turning it into a corporate bulldozer to destroy workers rights, particularly the right to organize unions.

2. Yuuuuge new tax cuts for corporations and the superrich, busting the budget for addressing human needs.

3. Privatization of such basics as public education, Medicare and Social Security.

4. Deregulation of corporate profiteers from Wall Street banksters to Big Oil polluters.

5. Eliminating the federal minimum wage.

6. Freeing corporations from rules that prohibit discrimination in hiring, paying, promoting and firing workers.

Why were voters not aware of Trumps little secret agenda? Not justbecause he wasnt about to boast about such unpopular policies but also because mass media outlets were so dazzled by the bawdy spectacle of Trumps tweets, spats and onstage tirades that they ignored fundamentally important aspects of his presidential intentions. In fact, his entire career as a luxury property developer and brand-name marketer of himself has been built on broken promises to workers, routine scamming of suppliers and partners, blatant self-dealing, crony capitalism and lies. That con game alone tells us who our new president really is: an incorrigible swindler.

At 70 years old, he possessesa nuclear level of narcissism and a gluttonous sense of entitlement that are ingrained. Throughout his presidential run, we saw his pleasure in singling out and demeaning people as losers, including nasty women, black protestors, people with disabilities, unionists, Mexicans, Mexican-Americans, Muslims, poor people, environmental activists and anyone who criticized him. How he treats us commoners wont change because hes President Trump. (Gosh, its gonna take a long time before I can say that with a straight face.)

So, yes, buckle up. But more importantly, buck up!

Naturally, a triumphant Trump has left many of us baffled, disgusted and terrified. But, please, we have to shake off these immobilizing emotions ASAPbecause progressives everywhere have important work to do. The forces of oligarchy and repression are hoping well surrender to despair, withdraw in fear or even flee to Canada. But come on, the fiery democratic spirit of grassroots Americans has sustained and advanced our nations fundamental ideals of fairness and justice in even darker times.

Its time for us to double down on what can be seen as the progressive communitys shared campaign for populist justice. Essentially, its the integrative struggle for human dignity, combining our many separate fights for justice into a powerful and righteous whole, an all-for-one, one-for-all effort against the economic and political elites who are determined to subjugate us.

We can beat back the brutishness the reign of Trump promises if we seriously unite. That means acting on the reality that our various groups really are in this together. When the Muslim community is attacked, for example, all of us non-Muslims need to recognize thatthis an attack on all of us, from union members to climate change activists.

We need to recognize that racial and economic injustice are inseparable. Making this connection is especially important now, forthe corporate media outlets are simplistically declaring that Trump won because white working-class men rebelled against the rising swirl of multiculturalism.

Of course, the corporate powers (and those who prosper by serving them) have long divided working people by pitting the less powerful groups against one another. So its up to us to stop playing along. We now have an urgent need to organize and harmonize as members of one progressive family that can and will mobilize as a whole to defend and advance the interests of each and every part, rallying around respect for human dignity and the common good.

View post:
Yes, America, you can resist the brutishness of the reign of Trump ... - Salon

Donald TrumpDonald TrumpMassive Women's March crowds swarm DC Metro How will President Trump handle violence against women in the US? This feminist stands against abortion rights captivity of women's rights MOREs inaugural speech was the most anticipated since President Obamas speech eight years ago. Given the unconventional and unpredictable nature of his candidacy and the mixed messages his campaign advisers were sending out in advance, Americans had little inkling of which Trump would show up today.

After delivering a full-throated populist speech with heavy doses of isolationism, protectionism, and nationalism, its clear that progressives have their work cut out for them in the coming months.

1. Trump is still being Trump

Given that Donald Trump is entering office with the lowest positive ratings of any president in modern history just 38 percent there was a lot of conjecture in recent days that his inaugural speech would strike a unifying note to rally more Americans behind his administration. That speculation was wrong.

NEW POLL: Trump enters White House with historically low approval rating https://t.co/biPSXlovoP pic.twitter.com/DXmeeJuffh

The Hill (@thehill) January 18, 2017

Unlike Trumps election-night speech, when he called on Americans who opposed his candidacy for (their) guidance and (their) help so that we can work together and unify our great country, todays speech featured no such conciliatory language.

Instead, Trump doubled down on some of his more controversial campaign rhetoric America First and pointedly attacked the politicians who are all talk and no actionconstantly complaining but never doing anything about it.

As we saw throughout the campaign, Donald Trump is unlikely to change his ways even as hes about to ascend to the highest office in the nation. Whether the office of the presidency will change him remains to be seen, but todays speech shows us that were in for a wild ride. Abnormal is the new normal. Expecting Trump to abide by political norms is wishful thinking.

Its an unpleasant truth for many progressives, but one with which well have to come to terms. Each day will bring a new outrage, a new falsehood, and a new low.

Its tempting to get caught up in the outrage machine and respond to each and every one of Trumps tweet provocations. But Democrats tried to play that game in 2016 and lost.

We will have to adapt to this new environment, remember to stay focused on the issues voters care about, and not let the national dialogue be dominated by Donald Trump and his antics.

2. There is a big difference between Trumps populist rhetoric and his policies Democrats should exploit it

Woven throughout Trumps speech today were a number of strong populist statements. He spoke of the forgotten men and women of America, how politicians prospered while jobs left and the factories closed, and how as president he would transfer power away from the elites and back to the American people.

This message was crucial to his victory in November. It resonated with Republicans, Independents, and Democrats many of whom had previously cast their ballots for President Obama. The great challenge for Trump now will be delivering on his lofty promises and making good on this rhetoric with his policies. So far, hes not off to a promising start.

In the weeks since the election, Trumps cabinet appointments and policy priorities have deviated frequently from this populist message. Hes pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which has expanded healthcare to 20 million Americans including many Trump voters living in hard-hit towns across the Midwest and Appalachia.

Hes appointed as Treasury Secretary a Wall Street executive who engaged in predatory foreclosure practices, while making a pretty penny for himself.

Hes signaled his opposition to an overtime rule that will increase wages for over 4 million Americans, all while pledging to deliver large tax cuts to corporations and the wealthiest Americans.

These contradictions not Trumps over-the-top tweets provide the most fertile ground for Democrats looking to fight Trump and win back the voters we lost in 2016. It requires getting back to the basics of what Democrats stand for and not falling for every shiny object that Trump puts out there.

For starters, it means telling the stories of people whose lives and livelihoods would be imperiled without the Affordable Care Act and highlighting Trumps empty rhetoric about helping the forgotten men and women of America, while hes instead handing out tax cuts and corporate welfare to the people who need it least.

In the long term, for progressives to be successful against Trump, it will require vigilance, discipline, and a laser-like focus on bread and butter issues not just a lot of noise about the Trump controversy du jour.

3. Progressives arent the only ones feeling heartburn today

As disturbing as much of todays speech was for progressives, fear not we are not alone.

His advocacy for closed borders and protectionist economic policies flies in the face of GOP free trade orthodoxy. His apparent foreign policy doctrine America First upends the post-WWII order that has seen the United States work closely with our allies in NATO and serve as a unifying global force in confronting atrocities in places like Kosovo.

With the increased political polarization in our country, there is little common ground to be found between Republicans and Democrats.

When it comes to engaging in economically disastrous trade wars, abandoning our closest allies, needlessly escalating tensions with nations like China, and refusing to stand up to gross human rights violations and atrocities like genocide, Democrats and Republicans might actually be able to once again find common ground.

Trumps view of America as an island is antithetical to both Democrats and Republicans. In the coming weeks, months, and years, it provides the opportunity for Democrats and Republicans to join together, and stand up for the values that have made America a global force for good.

Lis Smith is a Democratic strategist & co-founder of 50 State Communications. She served as the director of rapid response for Barack Obamas 2012 campaign and deputy campaign manager for Martin O'Malley's presidential campaign.

The views of contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.

View original post here:
Onward: 3 lessons for progressives from Trump's inaugural - The Hill (blog)