Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

The Progressive Movement (1900-1918) . Eleanor Roosevelt …

For Eleanor Roosevelt and others of her generation, early 20th century America was the training ground for a transformation of the relationship between a democratic government and its people. Perhaps the best known results of this era are the 18th and 19th Amendments, Prohibition and woman suffrage respectively. But this legislation really came at the tail end of the period which has come to be known as the "Age of Reform." The amendments were actually the byproducts of an immense social and political upheaval which changed forever the expectations of the role government would play in American society.

It was during this brief interlude, 1900-1918, that America was completing its rapid shift from an agrarian to an urban society. This caused major anxiety among the country's predominantly Yankee, Protestant middle-class because it introduced "disturbing" changes in their society. Large corporations and "trusts," representing materialism and greed, were controlling more and more of the country's finances. Immigrants from southeastern Europe -- "dark-skinned" Italians and peasant Jews from Russia -- were flocking to major industrial centers, competing for low wages and settling in the ethnic enclaves of tenement slums. Party bosses manipulated the political ignorance and desperation of the newcomers to advance their own party machines. To the native middle-class, these ills of society seemed to be escalating out of control. In the name of democratic ideals and social justice, progressives made themselves the arbiters of a "new" America in which the ideals of the founding fathers could find a place within the nation's changing landscape.

The progressives came from a long tradition of middle-class elites possessing a strong sense of social duty to the poor. The social hierarchy wherein blue-blooded, native stock was at the top and the poor along with the "darker-skinned" were at the bottom, was accepted by the elite. But inherent in their role as privileged members of society was a certain degree of responsibility for the less fortunate. Growing up in this social class, Eleanor Roosevelt remarked, "In that society you were kind to the poor, you did not neglect your philanthropic duties, you assisted the hospitals and did something for the needy." The Progressive Era is unique in that this impulse spread to foster an all-encompassing mood and effort for reform. From farmers to politicians, the need for change and for direct responsibility for the country's ills became paramount and spread from social service to journalism. During his presidency, Theodore Roosevelt commented on the need: "No hard-and-fast rule can be laid down as to the way in which such work [reform] must be done; but most certainly every man, whatever his position, should strive to do it in some way and to some degree."

Applying this sense of duty to all ills of society, middle-class reformers attempted to restore democracy by limiting big business, "Americanizing" the immigrants, and curbing the political machines. Theodore Roosevelt, wanting to ensure free competition, was particularly instrumental in curtailing monopolistic business practices during his time in the White House. He extended the powers of the executive branch and the powers of the government within the economy, departing from the laissez-faire attitude of previous administrations. By supporting labor in the settlement of the Anthracite Coal Strike in 1902, Roosevelt became the first president to assign the government such a direct role and duty to the people.

The immigrant "problem" was handled for the most part by white, middle-class young women. Many of these female reformers had been educated in the new women's colleges which had sprung up in the late nineteenth century. Possessing an education yet barred from most professional careers, these women took to "association building" as a means to be active in public life. Among these associations were the Women's Trade Union League, the Women's Christian Temperance Union, the National Consumers' League, and a vast system of "Americanizing" centers known as settlement houses. These organizations were meant to "purify" the public sphere of men in which vice and corruption were bred. The WTUL and the NCL sought to cleanse the largely male-owned garment factories in which female workers were harshly exploited. The Temperance Union sought to eliminate the dominantly male immigrant worker's drinking habits and with them, saloons and prostitution. With settlement houses, women such as Jane Addams and Lillian Wald set out to uplift the immigrant masses and to teach them "proper" ways of life and moral values. These houses, of which there were 400 in America by 1910, instructed immigrants on everything from proper dancing forms (intentionally steering them away from more popular and sexually suggestive dances like the "cakewalk") to proper housekeeping and civic reforms. Settlement house work influenced woman and child labor laws, welfare benefits, and factory inspection legislation.

By helping the immigrants, female reformers hoped to curb the influence of the political bosses in the urban slums. Ironically, however, their efforts only added to the bosses' popularity. Many immigrants saw the reformers as meddlesome outsiders with little regard or respect for their ways of life. Such nuances as temperance and woman suffrage meant far less to them than issues of subsistence: securing a vendor's license for their pushcart or obtaining false birth certificates so that their children could contribute to the family income. The political boss could provide these services while the reformer only hampered them.

Also working to expunge the ills of society were progressive, "muckraking" journalists. Jacob Riis exposed the poor living conditions of the tenement slums in How the Other Half Lives (1890) and inspired significant tenement reforms. In The Shame of the Cities (1904), Lincoln Steffens revealed the political corruption in the party machines of Chicago and New York. Most shocking to contemporary readers was Upton Sinclair's The Jungle (1906) in which he traced an immigrant family's exploitation and downward spiral in Chicago's meat packing industry. The novel resulted in the Pure Food and Drug and the Meat Inspection Acts in 1906, the first legislation of its kind.

At the outset of the First World War, the progressive spirit turned from domestic issues to international concerns. Extending their democratic sensibilities and sense of moral duty to the situation in Europe, the pro-war progressives approached the conflict with the same moralizing impulse. Under Woodrow Wilson's leadership, America entered WWI in order to extend democracy and spread its ideals beyond its own borders. When this could not be achieved -- the death of the League of Nations and Wilson's failing health being significant setbacks -- the reforming spirit significantly lessened. The nation was tired of war and it lacked the widespread desire for change to carry on the moralizing crusade.

The window of time that the Progressive Era inhabits is a brief one, but not at all insignificant. Its reforms introduced a new role for government. In dealing with the problems of urbanization and industrialization, the country's democratic institutions had to address problems on a very local level. This precedent would provide the backbone for the New Deal and would inspire the reforming spirit of the nation's leaders during the Great Depression.

More:
The Progressive Movement (1900-1918) . Eleanor Roosevelt ...

The Progressives – University of Virginia

The rapid industrialization and growth of a world economy in the Gilded Age gave birth to a reform movement in the last decade of the nineteenth-century that hoped to solve the many problems encountered in this swiftly changing era, the Progressive movement.

They feared that the future of Democracy itself was at stake. The hordes of people flowing into the cities, both from overseas and the "Great Migration" of African-Americans from the South, threatened to subvert the "American experiment" and corrupt the civil order. The Progressives thought newcomers must "forsake their language and obliterate their cultural differences" (Gilmore, 8). With all traces of foreign culture removed, these immigrants would then reflect the "traditional American ideal." Though a few Progressives believed in the possibility of a multicultural

Many Progressives tried to enact legislation that curbed immigrants' rights or put quotas on certain nationalities' admission into the United States. At one point, this attempt at exclusion came into direct conflict with the organizers of the Panama-Pacific International Exposition. In California there was already significant resentment of Japanese ownership of farmland and many politicians campaigned for the prohibition of their rights to own property. The President of the Exposition made a plea to the state legislature that such restrictions on Asians would result in the withdrawal of Chinese and Japanese participation which would destroy the opportunity to trade with these giants from the Far East. He suggested the legislature wait until the Exposition was over. The Progressive former mayor of San Francisco and its then current US Senator, James Phelan, countered by saying:

Despite the efforts of Moore and the directors of the Exposition, the Alien Land Law passed in 1913 and remained a law until the United States Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in 1952. Regardless, the Chinese and Japanese contingents participated in the Exposition despite their opposition to the bill (ibid.).

Read the rest here:
The Progressives - University of Virginia

Progressives unveil income inequality plan in D.C …

Standing under the scorching sun with the temperature approaching 90 degrees, liberal members of Congress, mayors, economists, labor leaders and activists gathered outside of Capitol Hill to rally behind a new progressive policy blueprint.

With the 2016 presidential campaign well underway, the set of proposals lays down a prominent marker for the priorities of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party -- a faction that's been eager to flex its muscles in the policy sphere and in recent years has found a powerful voice in Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

RELATED: Senate Dems block key Obama priority

It will also likely serve as a measuring stick for Democratic presidential candidates, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whom liberals are pushing to support progressive policy ideas.

"The crisis of economic inequality is massive. But it is well within our power to take it head-on," New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said. "And we won't do it from the top down. We'll do it as a progressive force."

With more than 80 signatories, the agenda includes more than a dozen specific proposals, most of them already widely supported within the Democratic Party.

They include raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, passing comprehensive immigration reform; passing national paid sick leave and family leave; a universal pre-K program and closing certain tax loopholes that benefit investors.

At least some of those proposals, like raising the federal minimum wage, are unlikely to gain traction in a GOP-controlled Congress.

Wednesday's press conference also came moments after Senate Democrats rebelled against President Barack Obama by voting against a key procedural motion on the so-called "fast-track" trade bill, and served as a victory rally for progressives who opposed the controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

New York Rep. Charlie Rangel said at the event that the trade agreement does not protect the working people.

See the article here:
Progressives unveil income inequality plan in D.C ...

With Clinton In, Progressives Ramp Up Pressure

Now that Hillary Clinton is officially in the presidential race, liberal groups are vowing to keep pushing Clinton to adopt a more progressive message.

Shortly after her video announcement, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee released its own video using Clinton's own words: "I'm not just beginning a campaign though, I'm beginning a conversation. So let's talk. Let's chat. Let's start a dialogue about your ideas and mine."

The video goes on to call on Clinton to adopt a "bold" campaign platform adopting progressive, populist ideas.

Clinton's official candidacy has done little to deter populist progressives, especially those who have been working to persuade Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren to join the race. Instead, these activists say they see Clinton's candidacy as a critical moment in the 2016 presidential contest.

"Ready for Warren will be stepping up our efforts to convince Warren to run for president," said Erica Sagrans, the campaign manager for outside group Ready For Warren. "With the 2016 race officially underway, we anticipate more Americans expressing their desire for a vigorous Democratic primary with Elizabeth Warren in it a primary that would strengthen the eventual nominee, ensure Democrats are better positioned to win the general election, and give working families a champion in Washington."

While many progressives won't publicly criticize Clinton, they believe Warren, who has rallied against Wall Street and excessive money in politics, would be well-suited as a fighter for the poor and the middle class.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who was elected on a progressive platform and is also Clinton's former campaign manager, said he is holding out endorsing her until he sees "an actual vision of where they want to go."

Warren, meanwhile, has said many times that she is not running for president. Last week, she turned down an offer of a million dollars from television host Bill Maher if she jumped in the race.

Still, Warren's supporters are continuing to organize in the key primary states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

Ben Wikler, Washington director of Moveon.org and the Run Warren Run campaign, said 12 staff members in the two states are creating "the apparatus so that when she does announce she hits the ground running."

Originally posted here:
With Clinton In, Progressives Ramp Up Pressure

Osun APC, PDP trade blame over post-election violence

The All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party in Osun State have accused each other of being behind the violence that erupted in Ile Ife after the House of Assembly election on Saturday.

The Director of Publicity of the APC in Osun State, Mr. Kunle Oyatomi, said in a statement made available to our correspondent in Osogbo on Monday that the violence in Ife and Ilase was caused by the PDP.

He said that supporters of the PDP, which won two seats in the Osun State House of Assembly, had been venting their anger on members of the APC, whose party won 24 seats out of 26 available.

But the Secretary of the PDP in the state, Mr. Bola Ajao, when contacted on the telephone, denied the allegation.

Ajao said that the PDP was not known to be troublemakers, saying the APC would attack and kill and would be the first to rush to the press to accuse the PDP.

The APC statement read, All Progressives Congress in the State of Osun has called on the national leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party to prevail on its partys Osun chapter to stop forthwith, the killings going on in Ile Ife and Ilase in the Obokun Local Government Area of the state.

Violence and murder are crimes against humanity and society and they are not tolerated in a democratic setting.

If Osun PDP leadership and their supporters have any issue or objection to the outcome of last Saturdays election, the lawful and civilised thing to do is to seek redress from the election tribunal.

However, the PDP secretary challenged the APC to name the PDP members who perpetrated the crimes.

He said, We need to ask the APC if those who engaged in the violence wore PDP clothes. How did he know that they were supporters of the PDP?

See the original post here:
Osun APC, PDP trade blame over post-election violence