Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Progressives launch campaign to get upstate cities to opt in to ‘good cause’ law – City & State New York

There wasnt unanimous praise when the state Legislature and Gov. Kathy Hochul came together on a housing deal. Housing advocates, labor unions, developers and landlords were seemingly united in their disappointment.

Lawmakers and housing advocates spent years pushing for good cause legislation sponsored by state Sen. Julia Salazar and Assembly Member Pamela Hunter. That bill would have prohibited evictions without a good cause and required landlords to justify any rent increases above 3%. In the end, budget negotiations left them with a version chock full of carve-outs and exemptions.

While Salazar and Hunters bill would have covered all tenants in the state, the version of good cause included in the final budget deal only applied to tenants in New York City. Other cities must explicitly opt in to the law in order to receive the same protections. In the weeks since the state budget was approved, supporters of good cause eviction have begun eyeing a host of upstate municipalities that could opt in to the law.

In years prior, some of these cities passed their own local good cause laws, but a 2022 state Supreme Court ruling found those to be in conflict with state law. Some cities moved to repeal good cause rather than face legal action. Now that the state has created a way for local municipalities to opt in to the state law, though, tenants from Newburgh to Rochester are eyeing ways to make good cause eviction a reality, and a few have a good shot of getting it done this summer.

The City of Kingston passed its own local good cause law in 2022 and could be among the first wave of cities to opt in to the states new good cause law. Brahvan Ranga, political director at the Hudson Valley-based progressive activist organization For the Many, told City & State that the city is one of their top priorities this year.

Cities like Kingston were able to have the courage to pass local good cause eviction laws, he said. Hes now optimistic that Kingston, Newburgh, Poughkeepsie, Beacon and possibly Middletown will opt-in to the version of good cause passed by the state Legislature. From there, he said, For the Many plans to explore opt-in campaigns in other municipalities.

Housing Justice For All Campaign Coordinator Cea Weaver said housing advocates across the state are taking a targeted approach to growing the amount of good cause opt-ins. The first phase, she said, will target Hudson Valley cities like Newburgh and Poughkeepsie as well as Albany and Ithaca.

These are places that we either have a pretty strong relationship with electeds on the council, or the places have already passed the (Emergency Tenant Protection Act), theyre majority-tenant cities, you know, we're not expecting a lot of political opposition, said Weaver.

Once those cities opt-in, a second phase could see organizing in municipalities where tenants have organized with more pushback from local electeds, like Hudson, Middletown, Syracuse and Rochester. There's some progressive political infrastructure, but it still will take some work, Weaver said.

Other parts of New York, she said, are on a much longer timeline, like Buffalo or Long Island, and Weaver says an injection of progressive candidates and more tenant organizing are necessary.

Upstate cities that opt in to the states good cause law have the option to tweak the law to cover even more tenants. Some municipalities who are planning to opt in are exploring changes to small property owner exemptions. In New York City, landlords who own 10 or fewer properties are exempt from the law, but some cities want to lower that threshold.

Katie Sims, co-chair of the Ithaca Tenants Union, said that the citys common council, which is composed of a majority of tenants, is aligned on the issue. It's kind of arbitrary on the tenant's part, Sims said. Like it's a protection for tenants, whether your landlord owns 10 or however many buildings doesn't really tell you anything about the tenant's deservingness of the protection, so we're really excited that they're planning on closing that loophole in the City of Ithaca.

Opponents of good cause eviction are not happy about the prospect of more cities opting in to the controversial law. Rich Lanzarone, executive director of the Hudson Valley Property Owners Association, said that good cause and other housing regulations are preventing a tsunami of building in New York. He has sued multiple city governments over housing legislation they have passed, most recently the City of Newburgh after it opted into the Emergency Tenant Protection Act in order to enact rent control measures.

New York State could solve is housing problem, one that has persisted particularly in New York City for 50 years without a solution, by eliminating all regulation and under that plan, people who are currently regulated would stay regulated as long as they live where they live, so they're protected, Lanzarone said.

Either Albany or Kingston is likely to become the first municipality to opt in to the states good cause eviction law later this summer, possibly as soon as July. Albany has the distinction of being the first city to pass its own local good cause law, back in 2021, though it was later struck down by the courts.

Canyon Ryan, the executive director of United Tenants of Albany, said the dynamic between tenants in Kingston and Albany is akin to a race, where tenants want everyone to get to the finish line.

It's kind of like a friendly competition, but also, we're all working to support each other. We talk regularly about, What does this look like? How are your common council members receiving and responding to this? Ryan said. We want to be the first because we were the first, and so we want to kind of maintain that title as the first city.

Original post:
Progressives launch campaign to get upstate cities to opt in to 'good cause' law - City & State New York

Commentary: Progressives are behind the wrong policies | Opinion – The Bulletin

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Read the original post:
Commentary: Progressives are behind the wrong policies | Opinion - The Bulletin

Progressive Prosecutor in Portland Faces Bitter Challenge From Co-Worker – The New York Times

Four years ago, Mike Schmidt handily won the election to be the top prosecutor in the Portland, Ore., area, expanding the ranks of progressives looking to remake the criminal justice system from the inside.

But he faces a daunting re-election bid from one of his deputies at the Multnomah County District Attorneys Office. His rival, Nathan Vasquez, a deputy district attorney, has blamed Mr. Schmidt for Portlands recent problems with drugs and crime.

Many residents have said they are fed up with the citys troubles a sentiment shared by big-city residents across the country since the pandemic, but one that is perhaps more acute in Portland. Homicides there hit record highs in 2021 and 2022. Businesses have fled the city center. Homelessness has soared. Opioid overdose deaths have tripled.

Mr. Vasquez has said that he wants to take on lawless behavior and prosecute even petty crimes. Mr. Schmidt, who campaigned in 2020 on making low-level crimes a lower priority, has responded to voter concerns by trying to burnish his law-and-order credentials. He supported a partial rollback of Oregons pioneering drug decriminalization law this year and dedicated more staff members to prosecuting violent crime. Car theft numbers have dropped rapidly in the past year, and he has touted that progress.

Voters across the West Coast have sent signals in the last few years that they want to see a crackdown on crime. In 2021, Seattle elected a Republican as the citys lead prosecutor for low-level crimes. The next year, voters in San Francisco recalled that citys progressive prosecutor, Chesa Boudin.

Mr. Vasquez was previously registered as a Republican. The post under contest in Tuesdays primary is nonpartisan, with only two candidates on the ballot. Whoever gets more than 50 percent of the vote will lead the office next year.

More here:
Progressive Prosecutor in Portland Faces Bitter Challenge From Co-Worker - The New York Times

Will the Progressive Left Bury the Two-State Solution For Good? – Commentary Magazine

Opposition to the two-state solution was once the province of a small group of rightists who were ideologically opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state. Eventually they were joined by a more pragmatic and hawkish contingent alarmed by the rise and popularity of Hamas and other Iranian-controlled proxies. Those two groups then benefited from the deflation of the Oslo balloon, in which many who supported Palestinian self-governance in theory had become disillusioned by the terrorism that followed each Israeli concession.

Those two latter categories are persuadable. The pragmatists can be swayed by the defeat of Iranian terror gangs and the emergencehowever farfetched it might beof a homegrown Palestinian nationalist party that reflects the changes in the region and makes its peace with Israels existence. The disillusioned can be swayed, perhaps, by the same thing that made them disillusioned in the first place: a change in Palestinian culture and behavior.

Yet all of those disparate pockets of opposition to a two-state solution might pale in comparison to the one that has only recently shown its strengththat of the ideological left.

Historically, support for Palestinian self-determination was synonymous with two states for two peoples, a concept with enduring support on the political left. Support for a Palestinian state itself remains high among self-described Democrats in the U.S., but that has become disentangled from the two-state solution, primarily because many progressives have come to believe that a Palestinian state would be the only legitimate one. This trend has left Israeli liberals with no real support system abroad, because even Israelis who support Palestinian statehood tend not to support the dismantling and annihilation of their country, their people, and their family. Thats a sticking point that isnt going away.

The post-October 7 pro-Hamas protests were revelatory in this way. Those inclined to dismiss these demonstrations by waving them away as college silliness must understand that the campus portions of the response to the Gaza war are a later development, evidence of the bandwagon effect. Immediately upon the news of Hamass success in carrying out the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, progressive organizers were out in force. The protest movement did not rise in response to anything Israel said or did; it was a true out-of-the-woodwork moment for Hamas superfans. It was as if a hard-luck baseball team made the World Series for once: Everybody who wanted to see Hamas win but hadnt made their Hamas fandom much of a priority suddenly came to claim their share of the spoils. The Democratic Socialists of America held what was essentially a victory party in New York.

Soon these demonstrations took to the halls of Congress, where staffers openly sympathized (and even occasionally defected to) the pressure groups attacking their bosses. Eventually Democratic representatives, and then senators, began to capitulate. Democratic-aligned super-donors kept the pro-Hamas demonstrators flush with cash. Elite university presidents granted the tentifadas wish lists, ceding them power over the administrating of the campuses. President Biden, the last holdout, folded and let them influence his foreign policy.

It would be one thing if this entire movement were merely indifferent to the two-state solution. But in fact it is undergirded by hostility to any Jewish sovereignty at all. The larger progressive movement from which it sprang has long been of the opinion that the vital conflict in Israel is over what happened in 1948, not 1967that is, the existence of Israel, not the expansion of its borders or territory, is the original sin that must be rectified.

The ideological engine behind this is decolonization, an upside-down anti-Western and antidemocratic theory of which Israel is only a part. But its a large part, because anti-Semitism does not do portion control. The flat-earther idea that Jews arent native to Judea or that the people of Israel arent from the Land of Israel is silly on its face, but the combination of ideology and conspiracy theory makes it impervious to facts and evidence in the minds of its true believers.

You do not, as Bob Dylan sang, need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. But the Weathermen are the ones with that wind at their backs.

Sometimes the easiest way to see this is by paying attention to those whose professional lives depend on their ability to anticipate shifting orthodoxy. In an April interview with Politico, Patrick Gaspard, president and CEO of the influential Democratic think tank the Center for American Progress, suggested the two-state solution might be a dead end. He and his interviewer then had this exchange:

You dont see a two state solution as a plausible outcome?

I firmly believe Israel must exist as a state. But I also believe Palestinians if we are going to solve this problem need to exist in an Israel that is inclusive of their full rights.

The pushback has always been that if you have a single state, you cant have a Jewish majority state that is democratic in Israel.

I think that taking out the possibility of coexistence is, in itself, really cynical and tragic.

Gaspard later tried to walk it back, so the finger-in-the-wind take is that Israels existence is at least still open to discussion on his side of the aisle. But the shift is pronounced and the forces driving that shift still have all the momentum.

See more here:
Will the Progressive Left Bury the Two-State Solution For Good? - Commentary Magazine

Progressives warn young voters, as Biden’s polling lags – Spectrum News NY1

Progressive New York Democrats on Capitol Hill are offering a stark warning to young voters, as polls show President Joe Bidens support from that voting bloc lagging compared to 2020.

They also have advice for the incumbent.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman told Spectrum News NY1 he understands young people's frustration. "I feel much of the same frustration, he said before invoking Donald Trump. The former president getting back in will be 10 times, 100 times worse than what we have right now.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in an interview, pointed to the legislative stakes in November, such as the future of climate change and affordable housing policy.

I just dont personally think we can afford to wait another four years for us to try to tackle these issues, she said.

In a Siena College/New York Times poll conducted in late April and early May, Biden beat Trump in a head-to-head matchup by just 4 percentage points among voters aged 18 to 29.

That is a significantly smaller margin than 2020. Siena College Research Institute Director Don Levy saidBiden won that age bracket by about 24 points.

According to Levy, part of the reason for the shift is the economy and inflation, which polling shows are the top issue for those voters.

By 33 points, right now, they trust Trump more than Biden as a steward of the economy, he said.

So what should Biden do?

For starters, after weeks of college protests over the Israel-Hamas war, both New York Squad members urged the president to heed the concerns ofprogressives and activists and try to bring stability to the region.

But they both were also eager to see the conversation turn back home.

It's making sure that we end this siege on Gaza and can focus on all the issues that matter to us, Ocasio-Cortez said.

We have to do something about affordability, childcare, utilities, housing - housing in particular - and that includes holding corporations accountable, Bowman said.

The progressives also offered some praise for Biden. Bowman noted that the president has been receptive when pushed on policy, citing rent stabilization as an example.

Ocasio-Cortez argued Biden has been effective on some major policy fronts, such as making historic investments in climate change and expanding the child tax credit. She also said such an observation can be true even if young voters are also concerned about Bidens foreign policy.

We can hold both of these things at the same time, she said.

She urged young voters to think of the big picture, saying November is about more than just one match-up.

It's about our actual legislative goals, right? she said. The only way we can do that is if Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn is Speaker, if Chuck Schumer of Brooklyn is the Senate Majority Leader, and if Joe Biden is President of the United States.

With summer just around the corner, Biden now has just five and a half months left to turn more young voters around.

See the rest here:
Progressives warn young voters, as Biden's polling lags - Spectrum News NY1