Mediaboss Marketing

Source: Blic, Tanjug, Veernje novosti

BELGRADE -- The Progressives (SNS) are "close to the decision" to form a government only with parties of national minorities, writes a newspaper.

This cabinet will also reportedly be made up "mostly of non-partisan experts."

According to the Veernje Novosti daily, the SNS leadership is unlikely to go for a new alliance with the Socialists (SPS), or forge a new one with Boris Tadi's NDS - instead, its main partner will likely be the Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians (SVM).

If SNS leader Aleksandar Vui opts for this scenario, such a coalition would have an overwhelming majority of 164 MPs in Serbia's 250-seat parliament.

According to the daily, it is possible that Vui, as future PM-designate, would offer cabinet positions to "undisputed names from certain areas." In this context, former minister and former Governor of the National Bank of Serbia Kori Udoviki is mentioned as somebody the SNS would "gladly see as minister of economy."

The newspaper says that top SNS officials have already spoken "in principle" with Udoviki and also with Ivan Vejvoda about their possible engagement in the new government - "but there is no agreement yet for any of them to become ministers."

According to the article, another former minister who could once again join the cabinet is Goran Piti.

Udoviki told the daily Blic on Thursday that she has not yet discussed a ministerial position with anyone. "A lot of people have called and asked about it and I told everybody that there has been no discussion about it. I have not yet received any invitation, or any specific offer," she stated.

VIENNA -- Serbian and Austrian president Heinz Fischer and Tomislav Nikoli warned on Thursday about the consequences of introducing sanctions against Russia.

View original post here:

"Progressives mull cabinet with minority party"

Published: Thursday, March 27, 2014, 8:55p.m. Updated 6 hours ago

In a March 23, 2014, New York Times editorial, Paul Krugman discusses a hot topic being pushed by progressives and Democrats in the media, on liberal blogs, at union halls, at political rallies and even on the floors of Congress. The topic? Income and wealth inequality.

I wasn't even aware that wealth and income inequality are two different things.

But I learned from Mr. Krugman, winner of the 2008 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, that income inequality is the salary gap between rich and poor. Wealth inequality, I'm paraphrasing here, is excessive income generated from investments and inheritances (non-salary income).

Liberals and progressives, such as Krugman, Nancy Pelosi and President Obama, love this issue. After all, inequality and class warfare go hand in hand. What better way to fire up the base ahead of an election season that looks rather dismal coming on the heels of ObamaCare failures and foreign policy embarrassments?

They portray income and wealth inequality as an issue of fairness. But, I ask, what is fairness?

Of course income inequality exists. Take my story as an example.

I am a reliability engineer by trade. My job is to find and fix problems with products to create happy customers and reduce warranty costs for my company.

The value of my services is probably worth more than those provided by a store clerk or a fast-food worker. But on the flip side, a brain surgeon provides much more value than I do especially to his ill patients.

Job value is, for the most part, directly proportional to salary. More value equals higher wages.

See the article here:

Preserve the American way

Progressives
Progressives.

By: AAVigil2011

Here is the original post:

Progressives - Video

Progressives In The Driver Seat (w/ Maya Rockeymoore)
Subscribe to The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow for more: http://bit.ly/TheZeroHour If you liked this clip of The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow, please do us a big favor ...

By: The Zero Hour with RJ Eskow

Go here to see the original:

Progressives In The Driver Seat (w/ Maya Rockeymoore) - Video

The progressive community on Wednesday was celebrating the life, work, and activism of longtime writer and Yale University professor who passed away late Tuesday at his home in Brooklyn after a battle with cancer.

Author, educator, and activist Jonathan Schell (1943-2014) A journalist who reported on the Vietnam War as a staff writer for The New Yorker and whose book, The Fate of the Earth, is still regarded as one of the great books on the nuclear threat, Schell became a longtime member of The Nation magazine's community of writers and an activist who focused on nonviolent struggles, human rights, and ending the injustice associated with foreign wars abroad and assaults on liberty at home.

Schell was a senior fellow at The Nation Institute and a lecturer at Yale University, where he taught courses on nonviolence and nuclear disarmament. Over the years, his work appeared in numerous print and online publications, including: The Nation, TomDispatch, Harper's, Foreign Affairs, and Common Dreams.

For a look at those articles which appeared on Common Dreams, click here.

In the lead-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq and in its aftermath, Schell was an outspoken critic of the Bush administration and put particular emphasis on the failure of a pliant media that asked too few hard questions both before and during the war.

In his last essay in a column series, titled 'Letter from Ground Zero,' based specifically on the aftermath of 9/11 and the misguided road to Iraq, Schell wrote movingly about how the flawed response to the attacks of September 11th, though clear for a time, at some point became hard to distinguish from deeper problemsboth new and old that he perceived were gripping the American republic.

"Until recently," he wrote in 2006, "it seemed possible to trace the main developments in the Bush administration's policies back to that horrible, fantastical day in September 2001, as if following an unbroken chain of causes and effects. Now it no longer does. The chain is too entangled with other chains, of newer and older origin."

Though many voiced the idea that "9/11 changed everything," Schell proved himself capable of more sophisticated analysis in which, despite the widespread damage and deep implications of those events and the Iraq War that followed, he concluded that "what remains most striking and most surprising is the degree of continuity of the systemic disorder in the face of radical, galloping change in almost every other area of political life."

And comparing the so-called 'War on Terror' to the Cold War that preceded it, Schell asked an essential question: "By looking at external foes, are we looking in the wrong place for the origins of [our society's] illness?"

In response to his death, Yale colleague Jim Sleeper offered a 'fond farewell,' calling Schell a "luminous, noble" individual who gave others a "powerful example of how to dissent" and concluded: "A much better societys future is dimmed a bit by the loss of Jonathan Schells insight, magnanimity, and love."

Go here to see the original:

Progressives Mourn Passing of Author and Activist Jonathan Schell