Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Progressive Era – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

President Theodore Roosevelt, 1901-09 (left), President William Howard Taft, 1909-13 (center), and President Woodrow Wilson, 1913-21 (right) are often referred to as the "Progressive Presidents"; their administrations saw intense social and political change in American society.

The Progressive Era was a period of social activism and political reform in the United States, that flourished from the 1890s to the 1920s.[1] One main goal of the Progressive movement was purification of government through direct democracy, as Progressives tried to eliminate corruption by exposing and undercutting political machines, bosses. Progressives also sought regulation monopolistic trust corporations through antitrust laws, which were seen a means to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers.

Many (but not all) Progressives supported prohibition in order to destroy the political power of local bosses based in saloons.[2] At the same time, women's suffrage was promoted to bring a "purer" female vote into the arena.[3] A second theme was building an Efficiency Movement in every sector that could identify old ways that needed modernizing, and bring to bear scientific, medical and engineering solutions; a key part of the efficiency movement was scientific management, or "Taylorism".

Many activists joined efforts to reform local government, public education, medicine, finance, insurance, industry, railroads, churches, and many other areas. Progressives transformed, professionalized and made "scientific" the social sciences, especially history,[4] economics,[5] and political science.[6] In academic fields the day of the amateur author gave way to the research professor who published in the new scholarly journals and presses. The national political leaders included Theodore Roosevelt, Robert M. La Follette, Sr., and Charles Evans Hughes on the Republican side, and William Jennings Bryan, Woodrow Wilson and Al Smith on the Democratic side.

Initially the movement operated chiefly at local levels; later it expanded to state and national levels. Progressives drew support from the middle class, and supporters included many lawyers, teachers, physicians, ministers and business people.[7] The Progressives strongly supported scientific methods as applied to economics, government, industry, finance, medicine, schooling, theology, education, and even the family. They closely followed advances underway at the time in Western Europe[8] and adopted numerous policies, such as a major transformation of the banking system by creating the Federal Reserve System in 1913.[9] Reformers felt that old-fashioned ways meant waste and inefficiency, and eagerly sought out the "one best system".[10][11]

Disturbed by the waste, inefficiency, stubbornness, corruption and injustices of the Gilded Age, the progressives were committed to changing and reforming every aspect of the state, society and economy. Significant changes enacted at the national levels included the imposition of an income tax with the Sixteenth Amendment, direct election of Senators with the Seventeenth Amendment, Prohibition with the Eighteenth Amendment, and women's suffrage through the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[12]

Muckrakers were journalists who exposed waste, corruption, and scandal in the highly influential new medium of national magazines, such as McClure's Magazine and TIME magazine. Ray Stannard Baker, George Creel and Brand Whitlock were active at the state and local level, while Lincoln Steffens exposed political corruption in many large cities; Ida Tarbell went after Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company. Samuel Hopkins Adams in 1905 showed the fraud involved in many patent medicines, Upton Sinclair's The Jungle (1906) was a novel that gave a horrid portrayal of how meat was packed, and David Graham Phillips unleashed a blistering indictment of the U.S. Senate in 1906. Roosevelt gave these journalists their nickname when he complained they were not being helpful by raking up all the muck.[13][14]

The progressives were avid modernizers. They believed in science, technology, expertiseand especially educationas the grand solution to society's weaknesses. Characteristics of progressivism included a favorable attitude toward urban-industrial society, belief in mankind's ability to improve the environment and conditions of life, belief in obligation to intervene in economic and social affairs, and a belief in the ability of experts, such as Tom Sawyer, and in efficiency of government intervention.[15][16]

The number of rich families climbed exponentially, from 100 or so millionaires in the 1870s, to 4000 in 1892 and 16,000 in 1916. Many paid heed to Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth that said they owed a duty to society that called for philanthropic giving to colleges, hospitals, medical research, libraries, museums, religion and social betterment.[17]

In the early 20th century, American philanthropy matured, with the development of very large, highly visible private foundations created by Rockefeller, and Carnegie. The largest foundations fostered modern, efficient, business-oriented operations (as opposed to "charity") designed to better society rather than merely enhance the status of the giver. Close ties were built with the local business community, as in the "community chest" movement.[18] The American Red Cross was reorganized and professionalized.[19] Several major foundations aided the blacks in the South, and were typically advised by Booker T. Washington. By contrast, Europe and Asia had few foundations. This allowed both Carnegie and Rockefeller to operate internationally with powerful effect.[20]

See the article here:

Progressive Era - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Progressive Politics and Political News

Same old rhetoric from the right wing

Its premature and unfair to criticize the Affordable Care Act when its significant reforms dont start to take effect until January. Calling Obamacare a failure over early website problems is political propaganda at its worst.

Rep. Daniel Reed, R-N.Y., said that Americans would come to feel the lash of the dictator. Sen. Daniel Hastings, R-Del., declared it would end the progress of a great country. Rep. John Taber, R-N.Y., said it would enslave workers. Rep. Thomas A. Jenkins, R-Ohio, called it a compulsion of the rankest kind. The conservative American Liberty League called it the end of democracy. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce called it a job killer and unconstitutional. The Republican nominee for president called it a fraud on the working man and a cruel hoax and promised to repeal it if elected.

Though these statements may sound familiar to recent ones, they were made by Republicans and their allies in the mid-1930s while criticizing new legislation called Social Security.

Social Security has become one of the most popular federal programs in U.S. history and likely our greatest achievement in the past 80 years. Social Security protects our elderly against poverty and assures young people of a more secure future. And if Republicans had gotton their way, it probably wouldnt exist.

Conservative hero Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, a likely GOP presidential candidate, was born in Canada to an American-born mother and a father born in Cuba, who was a Cuban citizen until 2005.

Birthers claim that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore an illegitimate president. In numerous polls of Republican voters, a majority of participants have questioned whether Obama is eligible to be president.

Just like Cruzs mother, Obamas mother was a U.S.-born American citizen. Even birthers dont dispute that. Read more

The origins of the progressive movement date back to the 1880s. Progressivism describes a political movement and ideology in which subscribers believe in progress, change, or reform, particularly in regard to who has control over peoples lives.

Progressives tend not to like the status quo and see the current political climate as being dominated by corporate and other special interests whose agendas are contrary to the best interests of the vast majority of Americans. Progressives embrace pluralism and individual human freedom.

Continued here:

Progressive Politics and Political News

Progressive Politics at Progressives.net

What are Progressives

The origins of the progressive movement date back to the 1880s. Progressivism describes a political movement and ideology in which subscribers believe in progress, change, or reform, particularly in regard to who has control over the government. Progressives tend not to like the status quo and see the current political climate as being dominated by corporate interests. Progressives embrace pluralism and individual human freedom. Progressives are a diversified bunch. They come from all political parties with a full range of human characteristics.

Progressive ideology supports human rights, living wages, pacifism, consumer safety, healthcare reform, a stop to corruption in politics, an end to corporate welfare, environmental protections, and Social Security. They champion consumer rights and seek a government run by the people rather than special interest groups. Progressives advocate staying out of unjust military conflicts.

Without progressives we would not have unemployment benefits, public libraries, a women's right to vote, environmental protections such as clean air, food safety, a 5-day work week, living wages, child labor laws, desegregation, national parks, Social Security, Medicare, and many other things - several are listed to the right - that people take for granted and make our nation great.

The chairwoman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee accused the Central Intelligence Agency on Tuesday of inappropriately searching the...

LZ Granderson says President Obama's "My Brother's Keeper" initiative represents the return of "change we can believe in"

Donna Brazile was inspired by Barbara Jordan to fight for voters rights and is launching a project to ensure that everyone can vote and all ...

The idea of returning to an open amendment process is the brainchild of Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, and Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Republic...

Once again, at a White House press briefing, Jay Carney was asked about the serious problems many unions, including mine, have with Obamacar...

The United States has failed over and over to confront its legacy of torture in the years of the Bush administration, what then Vice-Preside...

Original post:

Progressive Politics at Progressives.net

Are Progressives Ready for 'Political Revolution' with Bernie?

With lots of agreement, some divergence, and plenty of questions still to consider, progressives weigh in on a 'Bernie Sanders for President' campaign. (Photo: DonkeyHotey / cc / Text added)Vermont's Independent Senator Bernie Sanders has now said he is 'prepared to run for President of the United States' in 2016, but that he wants to hear from progressives across the country about what such a run should look like if and when he makes it official.

In interviews with both The Nation and Time magazines published last week, Sanders spoke in the most specific terms yet about why a serious progress candidate is necessary, what the goals of such a campaign should be, and the inherent challenges involved. And even though the self-described democratic socialist admits he's not 'the only person out there who can fight this fight'Sanders says the moment demands what he repeatedly calls a "political revolution."

"Sanders is right, now is a good time for a political revolution." Sonali Kolhatkar

Speaking with Time's Jay Newton-Small, Sanders said, "We need candidates who are prepared to represent the working families of this country, who are prepared to stand up to the big money interests, who are prepared to support an aggressive agenda to expand the middle class. And I am prepared to be that candidate."

And on two key issuesrunning against the as-yet-undeclared but clear Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton and the question on whether he would run as a Democrat or as an independent candidate outside the two dominant partiesSanders was descriptive if not conclusive in his answers.

In both interviews he made it clear he "likes" Clinton, has worked with her, and considers her both intelligent and highly experienced. But as he told The Nation's John Nichols, Sanders thinks that "the Clinton type of politics is not the politics" he has in mind when he talks about the need for transformational solutions to the most pressing issues.

"We are living in the moment in American history where the problems facing the country, even if you do not include climate change, are more severe than at any time since the Great Depression," he told Nichols. "And if you throw in climate change, they are more severe."

And to Newton-Small, Sanders was perhaps more clear: "If you talk about the need for a political revolution in America, I think its fair to say that Secretary Clinton probably will not be one of the more active people."

In the U.S. Senate, Sanders remains an Independent but has caucused with the Democrats since his arrival there. He currently serves as the chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee by appointment of Senate Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

Asked by Nichols if he would run for president inside the Democratic Party, competing in state primaries and appearing in televised debatesor running outside as an Independent or third party candidate, Sanders responded: "I want to hear what progressives have to say about that."

Excerpt from:

Are Progressives Ready for 'Political Revolution' with Bernie?

Must Jonathan visit Borno, Yobe?

President Goodluck Jonathan

The All Progressives Congress has called on President Goodluck Jonathan to visit Yobe State to commiserate with the families of students of the Federal Government College, Bunu-Yadi, who were murdered by the Boko Haram insurgents on February 24.

Comments:

Edo Boy: Yes, Jonathan should visit Yobe and Borno states. It appears that he has abandoned his constitutional duties for political campaigns across Nigeria. He should immediately proceed on a visit to the region since the 20 girls kidnapped by Boko Haram as sex slaves are still unaccounted for. I wonder what goes through GEJs mind.

Bazooka: As President, come what may, GEJ is duty-bound to visit Yobe. Visiting the state will help demonstrate the strength of the Federal Government and thereby send a signal to the outside world that his administration is, indeed, in control of the territory called Nigeria.

His visit is also necessary to show empathy with those who have lost loved ones to the terrorist activities of the violent sect. It is a globally accepted practice. Even American presidents visit war zones to encourage their troops. It is GEJs responsibility, not that of the defence chiefs.

punchng.com

Here is the original post:

Must Jonathan visit Borno, Yobe?