Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Will progressives stick with Ricardo Arroyo after sexual assault allegations? – The Boston Globe

Does truth matter anymore? Boston City Councilor Ricardo Arroyo a candidate for Suffolk district attorney is the latest politician to test the theory that it doesnt.

Arroyo is doubling down on something that is hard to believe that until he was asked about it by the Globe, he knew nothing about an allegation that he sexually assaulted a high school classmate in 2005; or that two years later, a second teenage girl reported to police that she believed he may have raped her after she got inebriated at a party. Yet some five hours after a Globe interview about these allegations, he contacted the second alleged victim of a crime he insisted he knew nothing about. Hey its been a long time! I need to speak with you can we talk? he said via Facebook message, which the woman shared with the Globe. The woman also told the Globe Arroyo did not assault her.

Get Weekend Reads from Ideas

A weekly newsletter from the Boston Globe Ideas section, forged at the intersection of 'what if' and 'why not.'

Arroyo says hes innocent of all the allegations which he may be. But he also says he knew nothing about them which is hard to accept, given his effort to contact one alleged victim. As reported by the Globe, the two cases involving him were investigated separately by police and neither led to charges. But also, according to the Globe, Police records explicitly state that a detective spoke to Arroyo and his attorney in the 2005 case. And a spokesman for Kevin Hayden, the current Suffolk district attorney, said Arroyo was contacted back then regarding both investigations.

Arroyo is running against Hayden in the Sept. 6 primary for the countys top law enforcement position. So yes, theres a lot of politics to unpack here. In a statement in which he denies the allegations and knowing anything about them until a week ago, Arroyo also describes them as a political hit job. Sadly, what has now become clear is that the current district attorney or an official working on his behalf just weeks before the election has selectively and illegally leaked incomplete information to the media, he wrote. This was clearly done to leave the false impression that I did something wrong.

Im sure Hayden thinks the same thing about the Globes earlier reporting of his handling of a case involving two Transit Police officers, one of whom allegedly brandished a gun during an off-duty traffic dispute and then engaged the other in a cover-up. Hayden is accused of trying to bury an investigation into the matter. He denies that happened and said the case is open and always was. But his denials didnt stop Arroyo and his supporters in Bostons progressive community from calling upon him to resign.

Will Arroyos supporters believe his truth, when they didnt believe Haydens? Thats what state Senator Lydia Edwards, a Hayden supporter, is asking. When she endorsed Hayden, the pushback from Arroyo backers was brutal. The progressives ripped me apart, said Edwards, whose election to the Senate as the first woman and first person of color from her district was celebrated as a victory for progressives. They were saying he [Arroyo] was the only progressive in the race. It was hard. It was really mean. She shared screenshots of tweets attacking her as a woman of color who harmed her community by endorsing Hayden.

Now the progressive community, which embraced Arroyo as the candidate who stands for criminal justice reform, must decide how to respond to serious criminal allegations against him. After all, prominent Arroyo supporters like Senator Elizabeth Warren, US Representative Ayanna Pressley, and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu have also stood up against sexual misconduct. In 2017, Warren called for then-Senator Al Franken to resign over sexual misconduct allegations and a photo that showed him pretending to grope a sleeping woman. In a letter to President Biden, Pressley has called for justice for victims of sexual assault and shared her own story. Wu, the first woman and person of color to win election to the mayors office, also stood up for victims when she released the files on a former Boston police officer who pleaded guilty to sexual abuse charges.

To stick with Arroyo now, they have to believe not only that hes innocent of these allegations, but that he knew nothing about them until asked by the Globe. They have to accept all of his truth, when some of it sounds unbelievable.

Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at joan.vennochi@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @joan_vennochi.

Read the original here:
Will progressives stick with Ricardo Arroyo after sexual assault allegations? - The Boston Globe

Progressive fundraising group raising $25 million to boost Democrats this November and beyond – The Texas Tribune

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

An alliance of heavy-hitting donors is closing in on a goal of raising $25 million for the 2022 election cycle, looking to build lasting infrastructure for the states progressives as Texas Democrats continue to fight for a way back to power.

The Texas Future Project told The Texas Tribune it has raised or gotten pledges for over $23 million, money that benefits over a dozen groups that are largely focused on organizing around certain issues or get-out-the-vote efforts for specific constituencies. The Texas Future Project started nearly a decade ago, but the $25 million would be the most funding it has raised in a single election cycle so far and a strong sign, it says, that Democratic donors still see promise in Texas.

The biggest thing here is when folks look at Texas, I think a lot of people understand theres a sustained investment [from the right], said Delilah Agho-Otoghile, executive director of Texas Future Project. I dont think that a lot of people understand its [also] on the left.

We explain the voting process with election-specific voter guides to help Texans learn what is on the ballot and how to vote. We interview voters, election administrators and election law experts so that we can explain the process, barriers to participation and what happens after the vote is over and the counting begins. Read more here.

Instead of letting only politicians set the agenda, we talk to voters and scrutinize polling data to understand ordinary Texans top concerns. Our readers questions and needs help inform our priorities. We want to hear from readers: What do you better want to understand about the election process in Texas? If local, state or congressional elected officials were to successfully address one issue right now, what would you want it to be? Whats at stake for you this election cycle? If were missing something, this is your chance to tell us.

We do not merely recount what politicians say, but focus on what they do (or fail to do) for the Texans they represent. We aim to provide historical, legal and other kinds of context so readers can understand and engage with an issue. Reporting on efforts that make voting and engaging in our democracy harder is a pillar of our accountability work. Read more here.

We arent able to closely cover all 150 races in the Texas House, 31 in the Texas Senate or 38 for the Texas delegation in the next U.S. House. We need to choose what races we cover closely by using our best judgment of whats most noteworthy. We take into account factors like power, equity, interest and competitiveness in order to determine what warrants more resources and attention. Read more here.

In reporting on falsehoods and exaggerations, we clearly explain why it is untrue and how it may harm Texans. Sometimes, we choose to not write about misinformation because that can help amplify it. Were more likely to debunk falsehoods when they are spread by elected officials or used as a justification for policy decisions. Read more here.

There are funders that are doubling down, she added.

The list of the Texas Future Projects beneficiaries include groups like Annies List and Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, which work to elect more Democratic women who support abortion rights. Theres Jolt and LUPE Votes, which are focused on building more Latino political power, especially among young people. And there are beneficiaries affiliated with the labor movement, like the Workers Defense Project and Texas Organizing Project.

Beneficiaries also include MOVE Texas, Afiya Center, OCA-Greater Houston, Battleground Texas, Texas Freedom Network, Texas Civil Rights Project, One APIA Texas, AVOW, Transgender Education Network of Texas and Radical Registrars.

The effort is coming at an unsure juncture for Texas Democrats, who had high hopes for a historic breakthrough in 2020 and received the national funding to make it possible but came up very short. Now, Beto ORourke is fueling optimism for Democrats in the governors race, but he remains an underdog and Republican-led redistricting has curtailed down-ballot opportunities, especially in a national environment that favors the GOP.

Agho-Otoghile, who ran ORourkes 2020 presidential campaign in Texas, said Texas Future Projects funders are undeterred by the current headwinds, noting that part of the groups mission is understanding the wins will not be cycle-to-cycle. She pointed to four pillars that donors are focused on: voter registration, voter contact, candidate recruitment and issue advocacy.

The Texas Future Projects membership list is anonymous, but it revealed several funders to the Tribune. Amber Mostyn, the longtime Democratic donor from Houston, is co-founder and board chair. Other individual funders include another prominent Democratic donor from Houston, David Lee, as well as a top Democratic contributor from Dallas, Naomi Aberly.

Groups funding the Texas Future Project include Way to Win, the Texas AFL-CIO, the Stardust Fund, the Movement Voter Project and the Heising-Simons Action Fund.

The group is set up as a non-tax-exempt corporation in which members are required to give a certain amount of money on a regular basis. The group then advises donors on the best way to spend their money with partner organizations.

The group sees itself as an unrivaled convener in the state, calling itself the only statewide entity that holds collective space for donors and organizations to align program and strategy. It has drawn comparisons to the Democracy Alliance, a national coalition of major progressive donors.

There is not a precise parallel to the Texas Future Project on the GOP side, but Texas Republicans have long had ample options for high-dollar fundraising. Groups like Gov. Greg Abbotts campaign, Texans for Lawsuit Reform and the Associated Republicans of Texas all draw millions of dollars for GOP causes.

In the short term, Texas Future Project believes its coordination with so many groups benefits candidates everywhere.

In an election cycle like this one, you need a few things to go right, Agho-Otoghile said. Make sure folks are talking, make sure were not duplicating efforts [and] make sure our groups are collaborating with one another.

Disclosure: MOVE Texas, Planned Parenthood, Texans for Lawsuit Reform, Texas Freedom Network, Afiya Center, Amber Anderson Mostyn, David Lee and the Lebowitz Aberly Family Foundation have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

The full program is now LIVE for the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 22-24 in Austin. Explore the schedule of 100+ mind-expanding conversations coming to TribFest, including the inside track on the 2022 elections and the 2023 legislative session, the state of public and higher ed at this stage in the pandemic, why Texas suburbs are booming, why broadband access matters, the legacy of slavery, what really happened in Uvalde and so much more. See the program.

Follow this link:
Progressive fundraising group raising $25 million to boost Democrats this November and beyond - The Texas Tribune

Over 650 Progressive Groups Vow to Fight ‘Dirty’ Manchin Deal ‘With Everything We’ve Got’ – Common Dreams

A broad coalition of more than 650 climate and progressive advocacy groups Wednesday called on congressional Democratic leaders to reject Sen. Joe Manchin's "alarming" demands for U.S. fossil fuel projects contained in a "dirty" side deal that the West Virginia Democrat secretly negotiated to gain his support for his own party's historic but watered-down package on climate, taxes, and drug price reforms.

"After the IRA paved the way for another decade of fracking and pipelines, we have no choice but to fight this dirty deal with everything we've got."

"We are writing to express our strenuous opposition to any additional fossil fuel giveaways," states the coalition's letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), noting that the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) signed by President Joe Biden last week "already included large giveaways to polluters."

"We call on you to unequivocally reject any effort to promote fossil fuels, advance unproven technologies, and weaken our core environmental laws," the letter adds. "You must stand with the communities who continue to bear the brunt of harm from fossil fuels and act to prevent wholesale climate disaster."

According to a leaked one-page summary of what critics have called "the ultimate devil's bargain," the proposal would prioritize approval of projects with "strategic national importance," set time restrictions for reviewing permits, alter federal water rules, limit lawsuits, and increase federal authority for certain facilities. Manchin is also pushing for the completion of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), a fracked gas project that runs through his home state but is opposed by many of his constituents.

"This fossil fuel wish list is a cruel and direct attack on environmental justice communities and the climate," the new letter argues. "Prolonging the fossil fuel era perpetuates environmental racism, is wildly out of step with climate science, and hamstrings our nation's ability to avert a climate disaster. Supporting this legislation would represent a profound betrayal of frontline communities and constituents across the country who have called on you to prevent the multitude of harms of fossil fuels and advance a just, renewable energy future."

The groupsincluding the Center for Popular Democracy, Climate Justice Alliance, Green New Deal Network, Indivisible, Oil Change International, MoveOn, NAACP, Oxfam America, People's Action, Public Citizen, Sierra Club, and Sunrise Movementare demanding "bold congressional action to address the existential threat of climate chaos."

Such action "requires limiting the production of oil, gas, and coal, which are responsible for 85% of greenhouse emissions and are the root driver of the climate crisis," the letter states. "Relying only on large-scale investments in renewable energy and environmental justice alone will not stave off climate disaster if Congress simultaneously puts its legislative foot on the gas to expand fossil fuel production and false solutions like carbon capture, hydrogen, biomass, biofuels, factory farm gas, and nuclear power."

The letter acknowledges that Manchin wants to tie his dirty dealwhich is already facing opposition from some progressives in the Houseto legislation to fund the federal government after the end of next month. The right-wing Democrat has even threatened a government shutdown if members of both parties don't back his proposal.

The coalition's letter charges that "tethering this legislation to any must-pass legislation including a continuing resolution to fund the federal government is morally abhorrent. Holding the funding of the entire federal government hostage to satiate one senator with a heavy financial self-interest in fossil fuels is beyond irresponsible."

"Sacrificing the health and prosperity of communities in Appalachia, the Gulf Coast, Alaska, the Midwest, the Southwest, and other frontline communities around the country makes this side-deal profoundly disgraceful," the documents adds. "Our communities and our collective future require the political courage to stop the fossil fuel stranglehold once and for all."

Representatives of groups that signed the letter echoed its urgent tone.

"This dirty side deal is nothing short of a wholesale giveaway to the fossil fuel industry to the detriment of frontline communities, tribal nations, and Mother Earth," said Joye Braun, national pipelines organizer of the Indigenous Environmental Network. "The world is on fire and negotiating the amount of fuel for those flames is not acceptable. Congress needs to understand that there is no compromise when it comes to protecting the next seven generations of life and beyond."

According to Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity, "it's atrocious that Congress is even considering dismantling bedrock environmental protections just to please one senator." He called the effort a "poisonous plan" that "must be stopped."

"The grassroots climate movement is fired up to stop this fossil fuel expansion deal, and the sit-ins at Sen. Schumer and Murray's offices last week are just the beginning."

The letter follows protests against the deal and resulting arrests last week at the offices of both Schumer and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the party's third-ranked member in the Senate.

Thomas Meyer, national organizing manager at Food & Water Watch, told Common Dreams that "Manchin and Schumer are in for a rude awakening if they thought they could slip this deal through without a fuss."

"The grassroots climate movement is fired up to stop this fossil fuel expansion deal, and the sit-ins at Sen. Schumer and Murray's offices last week are just the beginning," Meyer added. "After the IRA paved the way for another decade of fracking and pipelines, we have no choice but to fight this dirty deal with everything we've got."

The Stop MVP and People vs. Fossil Fuels coalitions are planning a public demonstration against Manchin's deal in the nation's capital next month. "No Sacrifice Zones: Appalachian Resistance Comes to D.C." is set to kick off at 5:00 pm local time on September 8 at the Robert A. Taft Memorial and Carillon.

"We are done being sacrifice zones, and we must stop this bill and MVP!" organizers said in a statement Tuesday. "We want to build community between intersectional Appalachian resistance organizations and have their voices heard! We must protect bedrock environmental laws and public input. We are in solidarity with all frontlines of the climate crisis."

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Tuesday granted MVP's request to extend its certificate of public convenience and necessity by four yearsa move that Russell Chisholm of the Protect Our Water, Heritage, Rights (POWHR) Coalition said "emphasizes the brutal length and uncertainty of the project."

"This project should never be built and this decision subjects our communities to prolonged harm," he added. "That's why tens of thousands of people submitted comments to stop FERC from granting this extension. Now we're taking our growing movement to D.C. to demand decision-makers stop MVP and all pro-fossil fuel legislation."

View post:
Over 650 Progressive Groups Vow to Fight 'Dirty' Manchin Deal 'With Everything We've Got' - Common Dreams

Betting on Trump’s Return – Progressive.org – Progressive.org

Latin Americas far right is rooting for a comeback. As progressives gain ground with recent election victories in countries likeColombia, Chile, and Honduras, rightwing politicians in the region are hoping that former U.S. President Donald Trump and others aligned with his values will dominate in upcoming midterm elections in the United States, and the presidential election in 2024. The situation in Guatemala is a good example of how the far right hopes to maintain its grip on power across the hemisphere.

Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei was among a handful of leadersmost notably Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obradorwhoboycottedthe Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles, California, in early June. But unlike the other presidents, who were upset that Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela were excluded from the summit, Giammatteis snub was a protest of criticism by the Biden Administration of the re-election of Guatemalan Attorney General Mara Consuelo Porras, who wassanctionedin May by the U.S. government for facilitating corruption.

I excused myself from attending [the summit] because I do not agree with the way we have been mistreated, Giammatteisaidon the far-rightGlobal Liberty Alliance Podcast. [We have been] mistreated by people from the State Department, who, in a clear interference in the internal affairs of the country, pressured us [and] told us they were going to make decisions against Guatemala.

Giammattei accused U.S. officials of attempting to overthrow his administration, adding that the two countries supposedly share the same values.

But Giammatteis values seem to more closely align with a powerful minority in the United States. He is a far-right politician who has attempted to curry favor with members of the global pro-life movement, andsayshis hard-line stance against abortion rights is because Guatemala is fundamentally conservative. Describing the country as a light to the world, in March, hedeclaredGuatemala to be the Ibero-American pro-life capital. In the podcast, he accused the Biden Administration of promoting abortions in Guatemala.

At home, Giammattei facesaccusationsof corruption. In response, he has sought to bolster his support among far-right Republican politicians in the United States. Since taking office in January 2020, Giammattei and his representatives havemaintaineddirect contact with ideologically similar politicians in the United States, including Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, while facing sanctions from the Biden Administration for dismantling anti-corruption and anti-impunity initiatives.

[Giammattei] and his people are very confident they will have Trump back [in 2024], Edgar Gutirrez, a political analyst and former foreign minister of Guatemala during the administration of Alfonso Portillo (20002004), tellsThe Progressive. This is an ultraconservative regime, and the only friends they have in the United States are ultraconservatives, who are now a minority.

Trumps election in 2016emboldenedmembers of the far right in Central America, and gave a tacit green light for officials in the region to roll back anti-corruption efforts in their countries. Trump permitted the possibility of uniting everyone [here] and expelling the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala, Carmen Rosa de Len, a sociologist and human rights advocate, tellsThe Progressive. The United Nationsbacked commission, commonly known by its acronym CICIG, was a key actor in uncovering massive corruption in Guatemala, but wasshutteredin September 2019 by then-President Jimmy Morales.

But Trumps loss to Biden in 2020 derailed many of those goals and ushered in new efforts to implement oversight and curb impunity and corruption. In response, the Guatemalan administration has continued to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobby U.S. officials, primarily Republicans.

In one such arrangement, the government of Taiwan paid $900,000 to the lobbying firm Ballard Partners, whose president, Brian Ballard, is a longtime Trump supporter and has close ties to the Republican Party. In return, Ballard agreed to provide strategic consulting and advocacy services in the United States, on behalf of the Guatemalan government,according toCNBC.

Other Guatemalanbusiness groupsand politicians have hired lobbyists to influence U.S. officials in recent years as well, including Zury Ros, the daughter of the late Guatemalan dictator Efran Ros Montt. Zury Roswho wasbarredby Guatemalas constitutional court from running for president in 2019 because she is related to a coup leaderhiredWashington, D.C.-based lobbying firm Sonoran Policy Group that year to persuade U.S. officials to help her fight the socialists.

Across the hemisphere, the ideological division seems to be widening. This comes as the political pendulum is swinging to the left in several countries, includingHonduras, Colombia,Chile, and likelyBrazil. At the same time, there is increasing authoritarianism in countries led by far-right populists.

El Salvador, for example, has undergone a rapid consolidation of power by its young president, Nayib Bukele, which prompted the United States to pressure his administration to guarantee the protection of human rights. Bukele responded by telling Salvadorans in California to avoid voting for Democratic Congresswoman Norma Torres, an outspoken defender of anti-corruption efforts in Latin America, during her primary election in early June.

Salvadoran human rights defender Morena Herrera tellsThe Progressivethat Torres has criticized the governments social policy and the lack of alternatives for Salvadoran citizens, which drew Bukeles ire. Bukele, she adds, saw this as an opportunity to gain favor with the Republican Party and cozy up to Trump, whom hemetin September 2019.

Herrera says that these efforts were meant as a message for Salvadorans that Bukele can influence the conditions of the Salvadoran community in the United States. Nevertheless, Torres won her California primary election and will advance to the general election in November.

If Trump were to run again and win, a national holiday would be declared.

Bukele was elected three years ago after promising to be tough on crime and to root out corruption. Later, hepraisedTrump for helping his administration fight gangs. Yet according to U.S. officials last year, in an effort to reduce the violence, Bukeles administration secretlynegotiateda truce with the gang leaders. Bukele denied the allegations.

The peace was short-lived, however, as sixty-two people died in gang-related killings on a single day last March, making it the most violent twenty-four-hour period in El Salvador since the end of that countrys civil war in 1992, the BBCreported. In response, lawmakers declared a state of emergency that led to the detention of tens of thousands of people. While local human rights groups say the state of emergency has resulted in hundreds of human rights violations, lawmakersextendedit for a third straight month in June.

With the Trump Administration, [Bukele and his people] have found an accomplice, Ricardo Castaneda, a Salvadoran economist with the Central American Institute for Fiscal Studies, tellsThe Progressive. If Trump were to run again and win, a national holiday would be declared [in El Salvador].

The same conspiracy theories that fueled Trumps election are being echoed by far-right leaders in Latin America. But this isnt a new phenomenon in the region. In the 1950s, for example, far-right political groups in Guatemalaattackedthe administration of President Jacobo rbenz with claims that it was riddled with communists. rbenz was later overthrown in a CIA-backed coup dtat, in 1954.

Today, thanks to social media and the twenty-four-hour news cycle, conspiracy theories circle the globe at hyper speed, and some Latin American leaders are quick to promote them. Bukeletweetedlast year that George Soros was meddling in El Salvadors affairs; in Guatemala, antisemitic dogwhistles about a globalist agendapromptedconservative lawmakers tohost aon the issue, which they then linked to gender ideology.

Like their U.S. counterparts, rightwing Twitter users in Guatemala criticized the sale of inclusive childrens books at one of the countrys most prestigious bookstores, after lvaro Arz Escobar, a conservative lawmaker and son of former President lvaro Arz,posteda video online denouncing the books. Conservative groupsrespondedby calling for a boycott of the bookstore and launching a campaign on the website of a far-right group to stop the indoctrination of children with childrens books.

The manufactured controversy over critical race theory in the United States has even made its way to Guatemala, where it is discussed in private text exchanges and online chats.

As in the United States, one of the main vehicles for these conspiracy theories in Latin America is the church. Conspiracy theories practically link these ultraconservative groups and fanatics of the neo-Pentecostal churches with the United States, Iduvina Hernndez, director of the Guatemalan nonprofit Security in Democracy, tellsThe Progressive. She says that from the churches, the conspiracy theories quickly enter into the political realm.

While Giammattei has claimed that Guatemala maintains a good relationship with the United States, and is committed to combating drug trafficking and undocumented migration, there are limits to his support for U.S. policies, which are linked to whether the United States will interfere with what members of the Guatemalan far right want. And right now, what they want is a return of Trump to the White House and of his supporters to Congress. They have their eyes on the November elections, Hernndez says.

In late June, Giammattei traveled to Washington, D.C., tocomplainto members of the Organization of American States about a report by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights thatcriticizedGuatemala for human rights abuses. While there, with theInternational Summit for Religious Freedomas a backdrop, Giammattei sat for aninterviewwith Trumps former press secretary, Sean Spicer, for the rightwing TV network Newsmax. He was alsointerviewedbyBreitbart, the far-right website previously run by Trumps former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon.

Back home, efforts by Giammatteis administration to roll back human rights protections and block access to justice continue. Former anti-corruption prosecutors, lawyers, and investigatorsfaceongoing criminal investigations, as do human rights activists andmembersof the opposition parties. The short-term goal of these far-right politicians and their economic allies is to tighten their grip on power ahead of a presidential election next year.

There is no institutional counterweight that is strong and independent enough to be able to put a stop to this agenda, political analyst Marielos Chang tellsThe Progressive. They already have taken control of all of the institutions.

Link:
Betting on Trump's Return - Progressive.org - Progressive.org

Hakeem Jeffries again challenges the left, on the eve of the primary – City & State

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, who is seen as a leader among New Yorks Democrats in Congress and a critic of the partys left wing, seemed to purposefully leave out a name among the candidates running in the 10th Congressional District.

There are multiple candidates who are highly qualified, in my view, to represent that district, many of whom Ive worked with, including Carlina Rivera, Dan Goldman, Mondaire Jones and Jo Anne Simon, Jeffries said in a roundtable interview with reporters in Downtown Brooklyn on Wednesday. Its still a very highly competitive race, he continued, And any of four or five candidates could conceivably win. And any of the candidates who are in the top tier, any of the candidates that Ive mentioned who Ive worked closely with who are in the top tier, are people Id be happy to work with, should they be successful.

Left unmentioned was Assembly Member Yuh-Line Niou, another member of that races top tier, and somebody who has positioned herself as the most progressive candidate in the Aug. 23 primary with her endorsements, her pledge against donations from real estate developers (with some exceptions) and support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movements right to engage in protest against the Israeli government.

To be fair, Niou and Jeffries represent different boroughs, and their districts are miles apart. Theres no readily apparent example of the two working together on either political or government work. The Brooklyn representative simply may not know her like he knows the others. But Jeffries is a particularly careful speaker who answers questions slowly and deliberately. And he has never been one to hide his disdain for the partys left wing, especially when it comes to electoral challenges to more moderate incumbents.

Jeffries dug in again last week, when asked if he thought the progressive movement had hit a wall, electorally.

Politically, the left did have some success in primarying Democratic incumbents in 2018, and 2020, Jeffries conceded, no doubt in reference to candidates supported by the progressive PAC Justice Democrats, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who unseated Joe Crowley, and Rep. Jamaal Bowman, who unseated Eliot Engel. But a lot of their electoral momentum began to dissipate shortly after Biden was elected. Its a question that the Justice Democrats and others have to ask: Why are we losing race after race after race, running against Joe Biden and the Democratic Party? Perhaps the voters are sending us a message.

Jeffries pointed to a couple examples of congressional primaries Nina Turners back-to-back losses to Rep. Shontel Brown in Ohio, Rep. Henry Cuellars win over Jessica Cisneros in Texas and Rep. Danny Davis big win over Kina Collins in Illinois. That could be the case locally too. The Democratic Socialists of America backed five candidates who werent incumbents in the June Democratic primary, and only one of them succeeded compared to 2020, when DSA went 5 for 5. But Jeffries may have overstated his case. Justice Democrats-backed Greg Casar and Summer Lee just won competitive primaries for open seats in Texas and Pennsylvania, respectively, and Sarahana Shrestha, who was endorsed by the DSA and the Working Families Party, defeated Assembly Member Kevin Cahill.

A similar dynamic could now be at play in the 10th District, an open seat covering lower Manhattan and northwestern Brooklyn. Niou isnt backed by the Justice Democrats or the DSA, but her coalition of supporters includes six DSA legislators, and she has the support of the WFP and other progressive groups like the Sunrise Movement. In the closing days, Nious campaign has tried to frame the crowded primary as a two-person race between her and Goldman. Shes the progressive insurgent woman of color, and hes the white male moderate Democrat, self-funding with $4 million.

Jeffries is not formally endorsing in that race, but he has weighed in on a few of the August races. Hes strongly supporting Democrat Pat Ryan over Republican Marc Molinaro in the special election in the 19th Congressional District though hes tempering expectations, and thinks Ryan may have a better shot in the new 18th Congressional District, which hes expected to contest in November. In New York City, hes supporting Angel Vasquez over state Sen. Robert Jackson following the lead of his ally Rep. Adriano Espaillat, who has prioritized that race himself. And hes backing state Sen. Kevin Parker, whos facing a vigorous challenge from DSA-backed David Alexis. It will be interesting to see whether the virtue signalers can break through in that particular context in a majority-Black district, Jeffries said, grinning with confidence.

But the representatives endorsements arent as clear and consistent as those of New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who seems eager to back anybody opposed by the progressive movement. Jeffries, after all, gave Maya Wiley his No. 1 ranked endorsement in the 2021 mayoral race, joining a progressive coalition that included Ocasio-Cortez and Bowman. And this year, Jeffries declined to endorse Conrad Tillard, who is running against DSA state Sen. Jabari Brisport in the heart of Jeffries district.

I definitively have no disdain for progressive movement, being a progressive myself, and a longtime member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus from the moment I first arrived in Washington, D.C., Jeffries explained. Its important to understand theres a distinction between the socialist machine and mainstream progressives, which some of the virtue signalers on Twitter dont always focus on as a result of a seemingly myopic view of the political world.

Jeffries noted that Espaillat and Rep. Nydia Velzquez, both of whom endorsed Rivera in the 10th Congressional District, have been criticized online because they are not supporting candidates that are part of the ideological purity test. Thats not a legitimate frame, in Jeffries eyes. Representatives progressivism should instead be judged by their legislative record. (GovTrack ranked Jeffries the 90th most left-leaning member of Congress in 2020, out of 237 Democrats. Velzquez was 27th and Espaillat was 11th.) There are some forces on the left that want to define progressive as you bend the knee, and we tell you what to do, and if you fail to fall in line, youre a machine Democrat or a corporate sellout. Thats a joke, Jeffries said. And what weve seen consistently in race after race after race, over the last two years, is that the voters arent buying it.

Jeffries himself has a chance to prove that Tuesday. Hes facing a primary challenge from the left from Queen Johnson, a community organizer. Johnson hasnt reported any fundraising and hasnt been endorsed by even a single pillar of the citys progressive movement, so Jeffries, a powerful incumbent, is expected to win in a landslide.

But his real race may come up after November. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had previously said this would be her last term leading the Democrats. But she and other leading party members like Jeffries the fifth-ranking Democrat, as Democratic Caucus chair have been tight-lipped on who could take over. Jeffries is a leading contender, but hes got competition. And hes not eager to talk. I think all of us within leadership are appropriately and singularly focused on holding the House in a hypercompetitive midterm environment, because the stakes are so high, given how extreme Republicans have become in the aftermath of Trumps rise, he said. Taking their eyes off the effort to hold on to the majority would be political malpractice.

But have there even been private conversations about whether Pelosi will step down, and who would lobby their colleagues to replace her? Silence until after November, Jeffries said. And there have been no conversations, and I think thats appropriate, because everyones focused on doing the job that is in front of them at this moment. And it would be irresponsible for people to put their ambitions and aspirations that are personal in nature above the collective cause of getting big things done for everyday Americans and winning in November.

Unsurprisingly, Jeffries expects that, come November, Democrats will be discussing who should be speaker of the House, not minority leader.

Its going to be a hard-fought battle, he said. But I believe that were going to hold the House and pick up seats in the United States Senate.

View original post here:
Hakeem Jeffries again challenges the left, on the eve of the primary - City & State