Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Progressive Volland leads in Anchorage special election, which will add 12th seat to assembly – The Midnight Sun

It was special election day for voters in Anchorages newly redrawn and expanded North Anchorage assembly district on Tuesday.

With the early results, the mainstream progressive candidate Daniel Vollandwho came into the race with endorsements from several prominent progressive and Democratic elected officialshas a commanding lead over a field that includes repeat conservative candidate Stephanie Taylor and progressive Tasha Hotch.

With 3,801 votes counted (a 10.37% turnout, so far), the race results break down as follows:

The election adds a 12th member to the Anchorage Assembly following the voter-approved plan to equalize the representation among the six assembly districts. Previously, the Downtown Anchorage assembly district had only one assemblymember (Christopher Constant) while other districts were stuck with only one. The change coincided with the citys reapportionment process, which saw the downtown district expand and reach into East Anchorage. The change saw Taylor, who ran against Forrest Dunbar for the East Anchorage seat, move into the North Anchorage seat.

There was concern among progressive circles that Taylor, who had Dunbar sweating a bit despite his eventual 13.3-point margin of victory, could capitalize on a race where the progressive vote would be split between Volland and Hotch. While both Volland and Hotch had strong results, the districts underlying electorate is strongly progressive, and it appears that its representation will continue to reflect that.

If Vollands margin of victory holds, the Anchorage Assemblys core of moderates and progressives would be back to nine members. The core lost one member in the spring elections when South Anchorage Assemblymember John Weddleton lost to far-right conservative Randy Sulte, who has aligned himself with the far-right Eagle River assemblymembers to form a three-member group.

A core of nine members would give the Anchorage Assembly one vote to spare on overrides of far-right Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronsons vetoes as well as the power to override vetoes of emergency ordinances (as was the case with the masking mandate last year). Veto overrides require 2/3 of the Anchorage Assemblys membership, which is eight members under both an 11- and 12-member assembly. Veto overrides of emergency measures requires 3/4 of the Assembly, which is nine members under both an 11- and 12-member assembly.

View post:
Progressive Volland leads in Anchorage special election, which will add 12th seat to assembly - The Midnight Sun

Zachary Parker Delivered Another Win for Progressive Organizers in Ward 5. Can They Keep Repeating This Success? – Washington City Paper

Zachary Parker wasnt up against a Green Team incumbent in Ward 5, but in many other other respects, his convincing primary win sure feels a lot like the one Ward 4 Councilmember Janeese Lewis George pulled off two years ago.

In both cases, most politicos were expecting things to come down to the wire; instead, both won handily. The candidates themselves arent so different either: young, Black, and generally outspoken about their left leanings. Lewis George even endorsed Parker, one of just a few sitting elected officials to do so.

And perhaps most crucially, both benefited from a small army of volunteers from D.C.s coterie of left-leaning groups, such as D.C. for Democracy, a constellation of labor unions, and the local chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. The latter group alone says its 60 volunteers knocked on a total of 40,000 doors for Parker since late Januaryfor context, theres about 53,300 registered Democrats in the entire ward, per elections officials latest estimates. Loose Lips is beginning to suspect theyve found a model for winning ward races thats replicable.

DSA has a very focused strategy and its clearly a smart one, says Zach Teutsch, who helped manage Lewis Georges 2020 bid and supported Parker this time around. They knew that if they could knock 30,000 to 40,000 doors it would be the difference in the race, and they were correct.

Its difficult to see what else couldve helped Parker win so decisively. The candidates all raised pretty similar amounts of money via the citys public financing program, so its not as if Parker had some huge cash advantage.

It wasnt exactly a weak field either: Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie bowed out, but proven Ward 5 vote-getter Vincent Orange was in the race (for full disclosure, Orange is suing LL for defamation over several past articles). Gordon-Andrew Fletcher and Faith Gibson Hubbard have deep ties in community organizing there, too, and Gibson Hubbard specifically had the benefit of McDuffies backing (and the implicit support of Mayor Muriel Bowsers administration).

Yet Parker won in a walk anyway, with his race one of the first called on election night (he beat second-place finisher Gibson Hubbard by more than 18 points, according to preliminary results). Parker himself says his message of bringing change to Ward 5 plainly resonated with voters and put him over the top, but the on-the-ground organization was probably just as important.

Tom Lindenfeld, a longtime political strategist in the city whos run organizing efforts for both Bowser and Adrian Fenty, suspects that Parkers success in lining up that much volunteer support was the decisive factor. He rejects the notion that most voters care much about the moderate-progressive divide among D.C. Democrats, arguing that if a candidate can present as an advocate on issues people care about (and then reach people with that message at the doors) they dont need a rigid ideology to win votes. Hes no great fan of the Democratic Socialists, per se, but does suspect theyre embracing the right tactics.

Theres a reason why progressive people win: Theres a lot more of them knocking on doors, Lindenfeld says. If mail turned out voters, we wouldve had a million people voting. Mailboxes were filled everyday in wards with competitive races. But it was the canvassing that got people to come out.

Of course, Teutsch cautions that those volunteers wouldnt have come out with such zeal had Parker not won them over with his extremely clear support for issues that lefty groups care about. He wasnt wishy washy, Teutsch says, so organizers were actually energized to devote so many weekends to hitting the doors for Parker. DSA, for instance, saw a clear example of a candidate who would fight to create social housing, defend Initiative 82 and expand worker protections, invest in alternatives to policing, and raise taxes on the rich to fund housing and early childcare and was inspired to support him, the groups 11-member steering committee writes in a joint statement to LL.

He doesnt shy away from his values, but works really hard to find common understanding with people, says Ed Lazere, an early supporter of Parker who helped him build credibility among progressives. And its pretty clear he occupied a progressive lane by himself, while the other candidates were swimming together in much murkier waters.

The real question for D.C. politicos is whether these tactics can work elsewhere. Progressives pulled off these wins in two very different wards, so theres reason to believe it could happen again. What happens, for instance, if Ward 7 Councilmember Vince Gray decides to retire when his term expires in 2024 and sets off an open-seat contest there?

DSAs steering committee argues that its last two victories were valuable not only for adding Parker and Lewis George to the Council but for building the power necessary to win a harder race next time. Knocking a bunch of doors is never enoughmaking sure you can knock more next time is just as important, the committee writes.

But can this success translate citywide? Progressives were heartened by Parkers big win (alongside apparent victories by Ward 1 Councilmember Brianne Nadeau and Matt Frumin in Ward 3) but the races for mayor, Council chair, and the at-large seat were all disappointments. Lazere himself has seen how hard it is for a lefty candidate to win citywide, having lost races for chair and a different at-large seat in consecutive cycles.

Part of the problem for lefty groups is winning over poorer voters, particularly those living east of the river. Ari Theresa, an Anacostia activist and lawyer who backed Ward 8 Councilmember Trayon Whites mayoral bid, observed on Twitter that the citys old guard was still very successful in precincts below the citys median income.

If progressives are for all D.C., lower income voters did not appear to believe it, Theresa says in a tweet.

But Teutsch notes that the margins of victory for Bowser, Chairman Phil Mendelson, and At-Large Councilmember Anita Bonds all declined compared to four years ago (including those in wards 7 and 8). Lindenfeld agrees, seeing it as perfectly possible to run a progressive, citywide campaign based on door-to-door organizing with enough dedication. That strategy was a big part of Fentys success back in 2006, he notes.

The DSA certainly seems eager to try someday, arguing in its statement to LL that this ward-level work is part of a strategy that gets DSA into a position to win things like the mayors office down the line.

By focusing on the ward-level race this cycle, we were able to talk to the same voters multiple times, build trust with them, and make it clear that Zachary was the people-powered candidate, the steering committee writes. Were looking forward to eventually making that case again for DSA candidates citywide.

Lazere and Teutsch both say that such an effort would really require finding the right person for progressives to back up with this organizing muscle. There arent any obvious answers just yet (maybe Lewis George someday, should she win again in 2024?) but recent success has them ready to start looking.

It will not be that progressive organizations can anoint a candidate thats going to win, Lazere says. It needs to be someone connected to the community, period. If that person does emerge, if there are people who have those deep community connections and the energy to connect with voters, I just think theres a huge opportunity for a victory.

This article has been updated to correct the number of members on Metro DC-DSAs steering committee.

Read the original post:
Zachary Parker Delivered Another Win for Progressive Organizers in Ward 5. Can They Keep Repeating This Success? - Washington City Paper

CAL THOMAS: How children are taught to become progressives

How are progressives made? By cooking them in a public school six hours a day, five days a week where they are seemingly indoctrinated with an ideology that contradicts the values and beliefs of many of their parents.

It began as a trickle, but now is approaching a flood as activist groups notably LGBTQ organizations have infiltrated public schools and demanded their views on sexuality and gender be taught.

Here are a few of many examples. In Montgomery County, Maryland (where I received a good education without the culture war stuff), Cedar Grove Elementary School posted this message on its PTA Facebook page: [we] will be celebrating love, respect, and tolerance: by use of video with students holding Pride flags while pledging, Love, Respect, Freedom, Tolerance, Equality, and Pride. What happened to pledging to the American flag?

Also in Montgomery County, a once conservative suburb of Washington, D.C., The Washington Times reports a group of parents are waiting for a federal judge to rule on their lawsuit directed at overturning a school district policy that requires teachers to hide how gender-transitioning students identify at school by reverting to birth names and pronouns with unsupportive caregivers.

Erin Lee, the mother of a 12-year-old girl in Fort Collins, Colorado, complained when an after school arts club her daughter attended turned out to be a Genders and Sexualities Alliance Club. Lee said the club taught that heterosexuality and monogamy are not normal. She also claimed students were told not to tell their parents. Lee pulled her daughter out of the middle school and enrolled her in a private Christian school where she says she is doing much better.

Its not just gender and sexuality that is being taught in public schools. A group of Jewish parents has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the teaching of what they claim are anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist materials in Los Angeles public schools. The materials, they say, refer to Israel as a settler state founded on genocide.

In their book Get Out Now: Why You Should Pull Your Child from Public School Before Its Too Late, Mary Rice Hasson and Theresa Farnan detail at great length with hundreds of documenting footnotes the progress activist groups have made in manipulating the minds of young people whose ability to think critically has yet to be even marginally developed.

This one paragraph sums up the challenge: Public education has been incredibly successful in one area churning out youthful progressives growing numbers of men and women in the grips of existential confusion, perpetual victimhood, and political intolerance ... The system takes full advantage of their most formative years in early elementary school, and the indoctrination continues through high school. Thanks to Americas public schools, they show up to college already prepped and ready to play on the progressive team.

The authors have an appendix in which they answer most of the questions raised by parents including how to deal with the cost of private education and whether their kids can play sports if they dont attend a public school.

Refusing to protect ones children from this stuff is a form of moral, spiritual and intellectual abuse. As this school year comes to an end, the summer would be a good time for parents of public school children to consider what is truly best for their offspring. They can start by investigating what is taught in their local school and they can finish by getting them out.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas latest book Americas Expiration Date: The Fall of Empires and Superpowers and the Future of the United States (HarperCollins/Zondervan).

More:
CAL THOMAS: How children are taught to become progressives

Progressives looking to change the narrative – The Hill

Progressives are ready to change the storyline that their wing of the party is losing Democrats civil war.

Candidate defeats and a rash of negative headlines have caused soul searching on the left, prompting some to recalibrate what they need to do to maintain credibility going into a challenging midterm cycle.

Two top progressives in the House Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) believe Democrats still have a shot at keeping Congress. But to do that, they told The Hill, the party must deliver economically in the short term for their voters, while putting more candidates in office who can push their progressive message into the future.

Every time someone brings up a loss, Im like, let me give you two for that. Two wins, Jayapal said in a wide-ranging conversation Monday in her Capitol Hill office.

Its a narrative that benefits the people that are in power or have power in our political process. But the reality is the progressive movement is ascendent in this country, she said. We have completely changed the narrative of what it means to invest in working people.

To be sure, that view may be a rosy one. Painful primary losses have offset some of the excitement of early wins, and Republicans are widely expected to take control of the House with the midterm elections, driven in large part by the economic pain many are feeling.

But Jayapal and Khanna warn that pain, largely from the sky-high inflation that hits lower- and middle-class Americans the hardest, wont improve without more intervention from Congress and the White House the type of intervention progressives have long pushed for, and President Biden has promised.

During the last election, Biden wooed many reluctant voters by pitching an FDR-style vision he said would move people out of debilitating circumstances. In turn, enough people believed in that promise to send him to the Oval Office.

But much of that pledge has since faded, frayed or completely fallen apart, causing lawmakers and activists on the left to push more strongly than their moderate counterparts to lead with a populist vision. If they dont, some argue, they risk giving the GOP control in the fall and beyond.

I am convinced a bold, populist, aspirational economic message can inspire and win, said Khanna, another top House progressive searching for new ways to address the current problems. We need to rebuild our economy around high-wage jobs for all and future industries. That should be the core of our mantra.

The three-term congressman, who was elected in 2016 when former President Trump rose to prominence, has been expressing concerns for months, most recently in a New York Times op-ed that resisted the desire to ding the other side for the stagnation.

There is no patience for incrementalism or political spin about economic numbers in these times, he wrote. Democrats cant just blame the Republicans for lacking a plan.

Khannas preferred path out of the danger zone includes forming a special inflation task force and using a World War II-era measure called preemptive buying, which gives the government authority to buy necessary items such as food and oil globally when prices drop. The idea of populist economic reform expands on what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) focused on during the presidential election, when Khanna co-chaired his campaign, and was prevalent in former President Clintons administration.

He and Jayapal both enjoy a close working relationship with the current White House.

As chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Jayapal pointed to several accomplishments she believes Democrats can campaign on in the fall.

Bidens embrace of tax reform thrilled skeptical liberals who initially wondered if hed be too fiscally moderate to push for it. When he cut stimulus checks to address inequalities exacerbated by COVID-19, even more were happy that Americans daily struggles from the pandemic could be eased. And hes canceled tens of millions of dollars in student debt with the possibility of more to come, partially checking off one of liberals biggest wish list items though falling far short of what many would like to see.

The president has said to me, personally, the Progressive Caucus has had the presidents back on many, many things, Jayapal said.

What Jayapal considers one of the lefts biggest wins, however, didnt quite come to fruition. The House passed Bidens massive social spending and climate change Build Back Better package, but it didnt move in the Senate after two moderate Democrats refused to back it. Still, the congresswoman from Washington says the lower chambers passage shows progressives were able to move a popular agenda backed by Biden. On top of that, she said, the White House has already enacted many of their most important executive actions.

This bigger narrative shift has not been covered very much, she said. And I think its really important.

Would we like them to move even faster? Jayapal conceded, Definitely.

While she and others in the House are still willing to work closely with administration officials, others are sharpening their criticism of the president, whose approval rating is now below 40 percent. In the Senate, Sanders recently called for a broad change of direction on vision and policy, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) recently wrote its not too late to get some wins on the books, aiming to offer a more optimistic tone. Both were in the context of the midterms.

But while the focus in Congress has been searching for a way out of the muck no easy task with a narrow majority and history working against their favor progressives on the outside are facing their own series of challenges.

We need to be telling folks that we arent losing steam, said Connor Farrell, the founder of Left Rising, a group aimed at electing more liberal Democrats to office. We have won several high-profile primaries while being outspent by the establishment.

The most recent was a surprise victory in Oregons 5th Congressional District, where progressive Jamie McLeod-Skinner ousted conservative Democratic Rep. Kurt Schrader, who was backed by Biden.

We have expanded the squad and its allies despite a major regressive backlash from corporate establishment forces, he said.

Liberal strategists and allied groups are nonetheless upset over other primary losses, and progressives who were once bullish on their chances to oust top-tier incumbents are worried public defeats have halted their momentum.

They watched their biggest and most high-profile race, a rematch in Texass 28th Congressional District, slip away by just a few hundred votes, when voters chose Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) over activist Jessica Cisneros. Earlier, they saw another big rematch in Ohios 11th Congressional District go to Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) over activist and Sanders ally Nina Turner. And in New York, a young Muslim women named Rana Abdelhamid, who was gaining traction in pockets of Queens, saw her chances extinguished after a complex redistricting process effectively pushed out lesser-known candidates from the 12th Congressional District.

To make matters worse, voters in San Francisco, one of the most liberal cities in the country, voted to recall District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a staunch progressive who sought to curb police influence.

Still, some progressives see success more holistically. They suggest theres a longer-term strategy at play, where recruiting and successfully slotting new members into office takes time.

Its about expectation setting, said Farrell. In 2018, we got [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] elected; in 2020, [Reps.] Cori [Bush] and Jamaal [Bowman]. In 2022, well send at least two new [progressive members] to Congress, despite the major pushback. We are winning.

Continue reading here:
Progressives looking to change the narrative - The Hill

Progressives are busy heading into midterms fighting each other – The Arizona Republic

Opinion: Elections are less than five months away and Democrats have a lot of ground to make up. But progressives are locked in drag-out internal fights.

Jon Gabriel| opinion contributor

As the midterms approach and discussions about Roe v. Wade and gun control dominate the news, progressive nonprofits should be busier than ever. Nows the time to organize activists, knock on doors and create viral social media campaigns.

The good news for Democrats is that these nonprofits are very busy.

The bad news: Theyre busy fighting against themselves.

Ryan Grim, a progressive reporter for The Intercept, reported on these miniature civil wars in a 10,000-word piece titled Elephants in the Zoom. Instead of moving the electorate to the left, many staff members are preoccupied with purging executives and co-workers who they dont think are liberal enough.

The premier research organization for abortion rights, the Guttmacher Institute, has been sidelined for two years with mutual recriminations stemming from what was considered by some a half-hearted effort to promote Black Lives Matter.

If your reproductive justice organization isnt Black and brown its white supremacy in heels co-opting a WOC movement, blared one dissent in an Instagram story. The release of the Alito draft decision to overturn Roe v. Wade hasnt distracted Guttmacher employees from their internal purge.

Unpopular with her party:Sen. Sinema faces backlash from liberals

According to Grim, Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and other reproductive health organizations had similarly been locked in knock-down, drag-out fights between competing factions of their organizations.

Its not just pro-choice groups, but also the Sierra Club, ACLU, Movement for Black Livesand Human Rights Campaign, among others. Its a nonprofit pandemic.

One organization leader finally quit but still kept his quotes anonymous. My last nine months, I was spending 90 to 95 percent of my time on internal strife, he told Grim. Its been huge, particularly over the last year and a half or so, the ability for groups to focus on their mission, whether its reproductive justice, or jobs, or fighting climate change.

None of this is new, of course. The French Revolution was launched by disaffected aristocrats wanting to reform their stodgy monarchy. Soon, a group of the bourgeoisie decided those modest goals werent sufficient, so they formed the Jacobin Club to steer France further to the left.

Some of the Jacobins then decided the club wasnt progressive enough, brought in the lower classes, and formed the Montagnards to steer the movement even further afield. They empowered Maximilien Robespierre to launch the Reign of Terror … before a group of Montagnards decided he was still too wishy-washy and formed the Hbertists.

Conservatives have been caught in similar purity loops. The fights between the Tea Party and Republicans-in-Name-Only is one example, and MAGA vs. Never Trump battles continue today.

Like the mythical Ouroboros, the snake keeps munching away on its own tail, never glancing around to see its partys fortunes evaporate. The Trump years unified the left into a sort of resistance fever. Its a grand time sticking it to The Man until the moment when The Man is you.

In Grims piece, one senior progressive congressional staffer (anonymous, of course) couldnt hide his frustration. There are wins to be had between now and the next couple months that could change the country forever, and folks are focused on stuff that has no theory of change for even getting to the House floor for a vote.

Im not saying its a right-wing plot, another executive chimed in, because we are incredibly good at doing ourselves in, but if you tried you couldnt conceive of a better right-wing plot to paralyze progressive leaders.

The midterms are less than five months away and Democrats have a lot of ground to make up. But progressives are too busy rolling tumbrels through their cubicles and admiring their own tails.

If November goes as expected, the left wont need to worry about new legislation distracting them from their main job: eating themselves alive.

Jon Gabriel, a Mesaresident, is editor-in-chief of Ricochet.com and a contributor to The Republic and azcentral.com.Follow him on Twitter at@exjon.

Continued here:
Progressives are busy heading into midterms fighting each other - The Arizona Republic