Mediaboss Marketing

By spending through an outside PAC rather than donating directly to the candidates campaigns, wealthy interests are able to spend unlimited sums of money under the Supreme Courts Citizens United decision rather than having to abide by the $7,500 contribution limit for a Senate primary. By law, the PACs have to remain independent and are not allowed to communicate with the candidates campaigns.

As of Tuesday, more than 85% of the outside spending on State Senate primaries had come from three groups:

The three PACs have already made their mark in some of the most-watched Democratic primaries, at least financially.

Take the 33rd District, where New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany has spent more than $540,000 on digital ads, direct mailers, phone banks, and polling in support of Camilo or opposing Rivera. Thats more than both candidates campaigns have spent, combined.

In the wide open 59th district in Queens, Brooklyn and Manhattan, in just two days earlier this month, a real-estate PAC known as NYC Forward dropped $248,000 on ads and mailers supporting candidate Crowley about 73% of what her campaign has paid out since January, according to state records.

The NYC Forward ads have been heavily promoted on Facebook, YouTube, and other websites within the district.

The ads arent subtle. One 15-second video simply shows two men violently fighting on a city street. On screen, a message pops up We need to stop the attacks in the street, and start fighting for you as it cuts to an image of Crowley walking in the street and urges people to vote for her.

Another ad opens with the sound of a police scanner and a New York-accented voice saying, Shots fired. It criticizes the Defund the Police movement before suggesting Crowley will protect our streets and our rights, with the latter half being a reference to reproductive rights.

The digital ads were funded by $250,000 in contributions from five organizations, according to NYC Forwards state disclosures. Of those, $150,000 came from real estate interests $50,000 each from limited liability corporations associated with the Durst Organization, A&E Real Estate Holdings and REBNY. The remaining $100,000 came from the labor union District Council 9 and its parent organization, the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades.

Neither REBNY nor a representative for DC 9 returned a request for comment. Previously, a union representative told Spectrum News Crowley is a serious Democrat and highlighted that she began her career as a DC 9 painter.

In a statement, Crowley made clear the ads are not from her campaign. She said she is running on a campaign to protect a woman's right to choose, make our city more affordable, and reduce crime through smart investments in community programs, mental health, and addiction treatment."

This group does not speak for my campaign and it does not reflect the messaging my ads have paid for, she said. I do not condone the imagery nor content.

Crowleys main opponent isnt convinced.

Kristen Gonzalez is a progressive candidate and community organizer backed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She said the outside spending amounts to Crowley breaking her promise to reject real estate donations even though the money didnt go directly to Crowleys campaign.

I am incredibly concerned because it shows our communities cannot trust Crowley in a housing crisis to actually fight for Democrats and also fight for working-class New York, Gonzalez said in an interview.

Gonzalez has the backing of the left-leaning Working Families Party, which has been active in recruiting and supporting progressive-minded candidates. The party has been active on the ground, but so far hasnt put money into any independent expenditures as it did in the June primaries, when it spent about $400,000 on ads and mailers for a slate of Assembly candidates.

New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany, meanwhile, is backing outside spending efforts in favor of three candidates: Camilo in the Bronx, Sen. Kevin Parker in Brooklyn, and Angel Vasquez, who is challenging Sen. Robert Jackson in a district spanning upper Manhattan and a piece of the Bronx.

The PACs support is based on candidates who support the education reform movement including charter schools that is often opposed by the progressive left. The organization is closely aligned with StudentsFirstNY, an advocacy group for charter schools and school choice.

"New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany has a proud history of supporting candidates who advocate for education reform and parent choice, Crystal McQueen-Taylor, StudentsFirstNYs executive director, said in a statement. This years elections are critical for parents, and were proud to stand with our outstanding slate of candidates. We cant wait to see what they will bring to Albany.

Camilo who has the support of the Bronx Democratic Party is a supporter of charter schools, while Rivera has long been a critic. The 33rd District runs from Van Nest to Riverdale.

The pro-charter PACs major spending in support of Camilo has funded a blitz of social-media ads, which highlight Camilos background as the daughter of a bodega owner and as a lawyer who was once president of the Bronx Womens Bar Association. The only indication the ads are paid for by an outside group comes at the end, when a narrator makes clear they are funded by New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany.

Camilo said her support for charter schools is about expanding access to more quality education and opportunities for our youth, not about gaining a PACs support. Albany currently controls the number of charter schools that can open across the state. In April, advocates failed to convince the state Legislature to lift the cap on charter schools allowed across the state.

"While strong public schools remain essential to youth development and success, charter schools play a supportive role to our education system, giving families the right and the encouragement to decide on what's right for their children's academic planning and future," Camilo said in an email.

Rivera, like Gonzalez, is also backed by the Working Families Party.

While outside spending remains protected free speech in a post-Citizens United world, reformers are hopeful that a key change to the states campaign finance laws could help dull the impact of money in politics at the state level.

Starting after the 2022 elections, New York state will implement a program similar to New York Citys where donations of $250 and under to state-level political candidates will be matched with state funds at a 6-to-1 rate if the donation came from a New York state resident. The idea is to bolster the power of small donors, though critics say it amounts to a taxpayer handout.

This is really the boldest and most powerful response possible right now under the current Supreme Court's interpretation of the constitution to big money in politics after Citizens United, said Lee of the Brennan Center.

Here is the original post:
Super PACs spend big on NY Senate races to hold off progressives - Gothamist

Yuh-Line Niou attends a rally for reproductive justice in Washington Square Park in New York City on August 13, 2022. (John Nacion / NurPhoto via AP)

Thank you for signing up forThe Nations weekly newsletter.

A down-on-his-luck New Yorker, anxious, a little street-worn, but in a fedora and a neat if very old suit, politely approached Yuh-Line Niou at Father Demo Square in Manhattans West Village last Sunday. I dont think he knew she was Assemblywoman Niou, or congressional candidate Niou. He knew we were two ladies on a park bench talking, and she seemed nice (maybe I didnt?). He asked her to buy him a slice of pizza at Joes across the street. She promised she would, as soon as she and I finished talking.

Niou kept her word. In the end, she bought me a slice of pizzafull disclosure, I missed lunch and had no cashand him two. But when we came back to the park, the man was missing, and her staff needed her to move onto other events. She held them off. Finally, the man in the hat showed up. He took the two slices of pizza with gratitude. Her staffers scooped her up and she went on to her next appointments, which apparently involved some call timedialing mostly for dollars, hours progressive candidates tend to hatebut then a karaoke bar in Brooklyn where she sang 9 to 5 by legendary queen, in her words, Dolly Parton.

The venue is not surprising: Niou has worked as a karaoke DJ, a bartender, an anti-poverty, anti-racism activist, chief of staff to the New York State Assemblys first Asian American member, Ron Kim, and then, surprising even herself, a candidate on her own. She won her race for the state assembly from a liberal but complicated Chinatown, Lower East Side, and Brooklyn district in the dispiriting year of 2016, and won it twice more. Vogue named her The New Face of Downtown Manhattans Political Scene. The New York Times endorsed her twice.

But in a crowded race for the Democratic nomination for the open 10th Congressional District seatthe election is next Tuesday, August 23the Times has been not been kind to Niou this year. The first slight was designating her merely a lesser known candidate in a headline about the news that the locally powerful Working Families Party endorsed her back in June. It merited a story, but the news value to the Times seemed to lie in the fact that she was lesser known. Niou got the paper to change the headline on its website, to drop lesser known and add her actual name.Related Article

Then came a joint Times profile, shared with New York City Council member Carlina Rivera, one of her closest ideological counterparts, which described the two progressive women of color as running surprisingly strong grassroots campaigns in a race of 12 candidates, including the self-funding Levi-Strauss heir, attorney Daniel Goldman, and well-funded Representative Mondaire Jones, a progressive Niou ally who moved into her home district to run against her after redistricting shifted the boundaries of his. It quoted only Rivera supporters, including an Asian American woman who specifically criticized Niou.

Finally, the Times endorsed Goldman, but the worst slight to Niou was that the papers endorsement didnt even mention her, or Rivera, despite the news sides describing them as competent, strong candidates with deep grassroots support, a little over a week before. Im used to being erased, she said.

The Times endorsement may well help Goldman, along with his wealth, despite his lack of political experience. But it also had the effect of galvanizing progressives, in anger. Niou teamed up with Jones at a press conference on Monday where they denounced Goldmanone of the Democrats impeachment lawyers and an MSNBC legal analystas a conservative trying to buy his seat, and urged district voters to choose Anyone But Goldman. Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

On one level, though, progressives should be angry at themselves. They failed to rally around one candidate, so that five politiciansNiou, Rivera, Jones, legendary former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman and Assemblywoman JoAnn Simoncan all plausibly hunt progressive votes. In this district, there are many. But split five or more ways? Goldman likely wins. In a poll released Monday, he garnered 22 percent support, with Niou at 17, and Jones and Rivera both at 13.

Niou has one powerful asset, though: that endorsement by the WFP. The party chose her even though it had endorsed Jones in his first congressional run. Yes, we supported Mondaire in 2020. Hes been a tremendous member of Congress, said Sochie Nnaemeka, the local party head. But there are three candidates in the race that have represented these communities, she added, referencing Niou, Rivera, and Simon. WFP is committed, she said, to elevating candidates solidly based in the community.

Here, to be fair, I should note that Jones made his decision to move to the 10th district only after Representative Sean Patrick Maloney, the head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, moved into his. Maloney had his choice of two newly drawn districtsMaloneys was divided, with more Republican voters addedand chose to run in the safer Democratic district that mostly belonged to Jones. Such courage from the head of the DCCC! Jones could have kept his seat, and Niou, or potentially Rivera, or even Goldman, could have won the 10th. Two safe seats for the embattled Democratic House majority, or two safe seats for the states rising progressive majority. A victory for Democrats in either case.

But faced with having to defeat the partys fundraising maestro, Jones decamped to Brooklyn to run in the already crowded 10th.

Readers like you make our independent journalism possible.

Before they teamed up against Goldman on Monday, in our Sunday conversation Niou lamented that Jones hadnt stayed in place to challenge the centrist rainmaker Maloney. I think he would have won. [Progressives] would have all galvanized behind him.

But Jones didnt, which leaves Nious left-wing supporters in a bind. Nnaemeka noted that the 10th district is one of the strongest in supporting WFP, as measured most recently by the partys push to get people to vote for Joe Biden on its ballot line (as I did). The 10th contains some of the strongest Working Families Party geographies in New York State, Nnaemaka said. In dense neighborhoods in Brooklyn, she said, upwards of 25 percent of 2020 general election voters voted for Biden/Harris on the WFP line.

Still, despite endorsing Niou, Nnaemeka would only say, We should align as progressives behind the strongest candidate, to defeat a self-funded, self-avowed moderate, in one of the most progressive districts in the country. Meaning Goldman. But when I asked her whether that meant WFP might try to get other progressives to drop out and endorse Niouthe party has some sway, since its backed Jones, Rivera, and Simon in the pastshe politely ducked the question.

Born in Taiwan, Niou mostly grew up in El Paso, Tex. She describes herself as a lifelong activist. At 12, she founded a group called Kids Helping Kids with some friends, to support children with cancer at a local hospital. Their fundraising strategy: collecting discarded cans and bottles and then turning them in for the recycling money. We were all out in the hot El Paso sun, scavenging for cans, but we only wound up collecting $60, she recalled with a laugh.

She graduated from Evergreen State College in Washington. At 22, she was diagnosed with autism. As a child, she says, I definitely knew there was something different. I didnt learn how to tie my shoes. Riding a bike, Im still bad at it. If you look at my report cards, you could tell: Straight As in all the subjects, an F in [physical education], and literally all the comments from teachers are like she doesnt talk in class, she doesnt want to do group projects. Im like: Mom and Dad, did you not think that maybe?

I think there was a lot of racism, too. People just assumed because I was Asian, I didnt speak English, she adds. And girls are diagnosed later in life. Women and girls learn to mask very well.

After college, she moved to Seattle. She describes one mentor, the late legendary civil rights activist Uncle Bob Santos, who with a multiracial team of allies taught her that oppressed communities shouldnt fight one another over the same piece of pie, we should fight for the whole pie. After a stint working for Washington state legislators, she moved to New York to get a masters degree in public administration at Baruch College, then went to work with Ron Kim.

In 2016, she ran for the seat vacated by the corrupt Democratic leader Sheldon Silver in a special election, and lost. Within months, she came back and won. Almost immediately she got attention for resisting then-Governor Andrew Cuomo, while he was at the top of his game. Niou voted against what she calls his austerity budgets, and made national news when she called him out for a $25,000-a-couple fundraiser where donors could also meet with budget director Rob Mericaduring a highly contentious budget season. It was a visual expression of corruption, she recalls. Cuomos top adviser then called Niou, and the two other assemblywomen who stood up with her, fucking idiots.

She has had 15 bills passed, her staff says, including establishing a hotline for sexual assault victims, and allowing hard-of-sight New Yorkers to opt to receive large text bills (Cuomo vetoed it, unbelievably; Governor Kathy Hochul signed it). Allies marvel that she was still able to get Covid relief to her hard-hit district even after falling out with the governorwho was soon to fall out himself. Niou was an early state leader demanding that Cuomo resign after sexual harassment and assault allegations surfaced. And resign he did. The fucking idiot outlasted him.

Get unlimited access: $9.50 for six months.

The 10th Congressional District is 30 percent Asian. It puts together the two Chinatowns, Niou observes, the well-known hub in lower Manhattan plus Brooklyns Sunset Park (which also has a large Latino population). Roughly 20 percent of the district is Latino. Its also about 16 percent Jewish, which could be a hurdle for Niou: She hasnt denounced the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel, and she has come out against moves, by the Trump State Department, the Cuomo administration, and others, to punish or withhold public funding from institutions or individuals who support BDS. I support the free speech rights of a nonviolent protest movement, she tells me. Its important to make sure people are able to fight for human rights issues. Some prominent Jewish advocacy groups insist that this means she supports BDS.

I point out to Niou that its possible to argue that the supporters of the BDS movement shouldnt themselves face sanctions, while also questioning, even opposing, the movement itselfand that she hasnt made that distinction herself.

I havent, she answered. Thats a good distinction that youre making. I think its a valid movement and needs to be heard. I found her answer evasive, to be honest. Its worth noting that Niou has said she would travel to Israel as a member of Congress. So shes clearly not boycotting.

Yuh-Line firmly believes in the right of Israel to exist and to defend itself, while supporting the consensus position that American taxpayer dollars should never be used to support violations of human rights, her campaign told me in a statement. While Yuh-Line has not personally participated in the BDS movement, she supports the free speech rights of BDS activists. At the same time, Yuh-Line does not agree with all of the BDS movements demands nor does she embrace all of its tactics. Thats a mouthful, but its a little different from saying she supports BDS, as in backs all of its stances and actions.

But that hasnt been enough to keep supporters from labeling her anti-Semitic. Which stings, she says.

I grew up in the Jewish community, in the Jewish Community Center of El Paso, Tex., she tells me. I was bullied as a kid, as a kid with a disability, and one of the only Asian kids. The Jewish community was the most welcoming to me, to my family, my little brother. I went to Jewish pre-kindergarten. Every year I went to a Jewish summer camp. As a teen, she went back as a counselor. Ive always seen the Jewish community as a safe haven.

While shes supported by the progressive local organization The Jewish Vote, the agitation over her BDS stance seems intended to make sure the Jewish community doesnt see her as a safe haven. Or electable.

Short of other progressives dropping out and rallying around her, Niou says shes counting on her army of roughly 1,000 volunteers, 600 of whom the campaign says are in the field every day, knocking doors and phone banking, to lift her to victory. Though she and Jones made common cause against Goldman at their Monday press conference, she also slightly tweaked the Mondaire-come-lately by saying that her estimated campaign volunteers are my neighbors, are my friends, are my family here in Lower Manhattan and in Brooklyn, won over by her six years representing the district. Which, by the way, is the only one, of all the other office holders, that completely, neatly fits inside the 10th CD.

Critics say Niou is too far to the left, and the progressive but center-moving Rivera might be a better choice for the left to rally around. But Rivera has made some moves to the center recently, and alienated progressives by taking a lot of real estate money. Still, she has the backing of SEIU 1099 and representatives Adriano Espaillat and Nydia Vasquez.

Niou is backed by not only the WFP but the Sunrise Movement, New York City public advocate Jumaane Williams, former gubernatorial candidate Cynthia Nixon, and many of her Assembly colleagues.

I should say here: I know and like Goldman, as a former MSNBC colleague. I think calling him conservative is a bit much. Hes a mainstream liberal, and hed probably be a fine congressperson. But in a majority-minority district, with an economically struggling majority whatever their race, but which nonetheless brackets in the West Village and Goldmans tony Tribeca neighborhood, I understand why 10th district progressives are outraged.

His admirers at the Times even acknowledged that Mr. Goldman would need to use his first term to convince the large numbers of lower-income and middle-class Americans he would represent that he understands the issues facing those constituents.

Seems like affirmative action for rich white guys to me. Goldman gets an extra two years to convince the large numbers of lower-income and middle-class Americans he understands them and can represent them?

The election is less than a week away, and the five top-polling candidates, including Goldman, Niou, Rivera, Jones, and Simon, face one another at a debate tonight. It will be interesting to see if progressives can get out of their own way, even at this late date, and unite behind one candidate. If they dont, its not inevitable Goldman will win. But its likely.

Read this article:
Can Yuh-Line Niou Unite Fractured Progressives to Win a New York Congressional Seat? - The Nation

CLEVELAND, Ohio - Local insurance giant Progressive Corp. has put five of its office buildings in the eastern suburbs of Cleveland up for sale as it responds to the new realities of the workplace.

The companys decision comes nearly two-and-a half-years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to large numbers of employees working remotely. After Progressive reopened its offices early this year, the company saw little change, according to Progressive spokesman Jeff Sibel.

Over the last couple of months, we havent had many people onsite, Sibel stated in an email to cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer. After a lot of analysis of employee trends and financial considerations, weve decided to not renew some of our leases on buildings and put a few of our owned locations up for sale with the intent of giving employees currently working at those sites space at another building in the area, including at one of our nearby state-of-the-art campuses.

He added that Progressive will continue to evaluate how office utilization will impact its real estate footprint.

Progressive placed office buildings at 6055 Parkland Boulevard in Mayfield Heights, 624, 625, and 650 Alpha Drive in Highland Heights and 651 Beta Drive in Mayfield on the market, according to Sibel. The buildings make up about 5% of the companys real estate holdings.

We still know we have a lot to learn about what our long-term plans ultimately will look like and many of our business areas are still in the process of determining optimal work arrangements and locations for our people, Sibel stated.

Terry Coyne, vice chairman of the Cleveland office of the Newmark real estate brokerage firm, said he is not surprised by Progressives decision to selll some of its buildings.

They are shedding the less valuable, less appealing buildings. Its just an example of the hybrid work model, he said.

Mayfield Mayor Brenda Bodnar said she knew about the 651 Beta Drive listing for over a week ago because she is in constant communication with the insurance companys leadership. She said she was reassured that those jobs would remain in Mayfield at another Progressive location. In addition to the listed buildings, Progressive is also selling a vacant lot it owns behind the Mayfield Branch of the Cuyahoga County Library at 500 SOM Center Road. The company had planned turn it into a third campus, she said, but that never came to fruition.

Bodnar said there are two businesses that have showed interest in the vacant lot.

If that land could be put to productive use bringing jobs to village, that would be a positive, she said.

Coyne said the sale of Progressive buildings could not have happened at a worse time in terms of the state of the real estate market, but added that suburban office space is still very appealing to businesses.

People right now, according to the numbers, prefer the suburbs, he said. Its easier to get to, especially single story buildings. Theyre easier to get in and out. So I think between (the suburbs and downtown), its probably better to own in the suburbs, generally speaking, but the hybrid work model is really the message.

Continued here:
Progressive looking to sell several office buildings as most employees remain offsite - cleveland.com

Election 2022: NWP proposing a review of Anvil Centre rental fees, improved way-finding for galleries

The creation of a NW Art Market and a review of rates for using Anvil Centre for arts-related activities are two of the election ideas being put forward by the New West Progressives.

In an Aug. 22 press release, the New West Progressives say local artists have been neglected by the local government and have no dedicated, affordable space to work and showcase their art.

New Westminster has a vibrant arts and culture community with talented and creative professionals. These artists are musicians, painters, actors and entrepreneurs, said council candidate Jiayi Li-McCarthy in the news release. As a city councillor, I will ensure city hall continues its multi-year arts and culture funding strategy and explore every opportunity to develop new places in the city for artists to work and display their art.

If elected, New West Progressives council candidates pledge to better promote the citys artists and cultural activities in New Westminster and beyond to raise awareness about the citys artistic community.

Our city has an incredible arts and culture community that has demonstrated it can produce top-quality festivals, events and products, said the news release. Sadly, nobody knows about it.

The NWP is proposing to install additional signage to direct the public and tourists to local artisans and their studios. This would also include more permanent public signage and promotion of farmers markets and similar events.

Artists need space to create and showcase their work, says Li-McCarthy. One of my initiatives on city council will be to establish accessible city land or buildings to foster the development of a new NW Art Market which would profile and celebrate local artisans.

Concerned that Anvil Centre rates are too costly for many citizens to rent a room or use the facility, the New West Progressives are promising to conduct an independent review of the Anvil Centres programs, cost structure and fees, with the goal of making it more of a regional hub for concerts and plays.

In addition, the New West Progressives are proposing to bring the community art space down to the street level to encourage greater public interaction.

Located on the third floor of Anvil Centre, the community art gallery provides a space where New Westminster-based arts groups can organize members exhibitions.

New Westminster city council adopted a new arts strategy in December 2018. The 34-page document includes a variety of goals related to the arts: to increase public awareness of the arts; to cultivate support for artists and develop audiences; to increase inclusion and accessibility in the arts; to create economic opportunities and increase contribution to the arts; and to embrace and encourage innovative ideas.

The citys arts strategy task force was comprised of some council members, city staff and members of the arts community.

In 2016, the city embarked on a process to update the arts strategy that had been developed in 2008. The draft five-year strategy was unveiled at Anvil Centre in April 2018, where a variety of concerns were raised about the document.

In May 2018, council unanimously agreed to send comments on the draft strategy back to staff for another look. Council ultimately approved a revamped 2018 to 2023 strategy in December 2018.

NWP will also implement effective, meaningful and ongoing dialogue with the local arts and culture community to gather their input on support services and programs, McCarthy said in the news release. There is a duplication of city-operated arts programs and those run by community groups and agencies. With the publics feedback, we will reduce or eliminate these redundant programs with an aim to supporting community groups as the first priority.

View post:
New West Progressives pledging to better promote local artists and arts events - The Record (New Westminster)

by James C. Sherlock

The Virginian-Pilot, in an editorial, bemoaned Governor Youngkins endorsement of a policy that would require schools to tell parents about their kids transexual identity expressions at school.

Its as though the potential consequences of such a policy have never crossed his mind.

The sure consequences of opposing that policy were not discussed.

The Pilot brain trust did not address, and perhaps did not care, that a child in Virginia must have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a predicate for mental health treatment. And, of course, for physically invasive treatments.

Most Virginians think parental/guardian consent is required for all of that.It certainly should be. But it wont be if progressives find the right judge.

Medical ethics should help protect kids, but will not. Progressive medical providers think themselves to be doing the best thing for the child, even with the dangerous, irreversible and ghastly treatments to which some providers subject children diagnosed as gender dysphoric.

Neither will judicial ethics. Read the papers every day for things that progressives think best for all of us. Progressive judges will think themselves to be doing the right thing as well.

Virginia is thick with progressive doctors and judges. It is thicker with parents.

The progressives need to be stopped by changes in Virginia law. This is a very complicated subject. So the background discussion will be extensive.

The editorial references high LGBTQ child suicide rates the suicide card. A serious issue. Professional mental health intervention will reduce suicides. Everyone can get behind that. But school psychologists are not licensed for clinical practice.

So, professional help depends upon parental/guardian consent or a court order.

Another chapter of the progressive catechism holds that transgender children should be supported by puberty blockers, the effects of which are reversible, and cross-gender hormones, the effects of which include sterilization. But that also requires parental/guardian consent.

Or a court order.

The left would have to thread needles with no eyes in justifying both not telling the parents and getting the children medical treatment. So, they ignore the practical impossibility of holding both positions.

Dogma assumes miracles.

Or a court order. Progressive nirvana.

Dangerous parents. The Pilot wants parents kept in the dark.

It wants schools to honor the wishes of a child not to tell his or her parents. As a direct result, the children could not legally be diagnosed or treated without a court order. Which, in turn, would require the parents be advised of the childs transsexual proclivities.

In order to take the child from the parents control using the normal state due process procedures in Virginia, a Child Protective Services (CPS) evaluation is required. It is predicated on evidence of abuse, not an assumption of it by school personnel. If CPS finds abuse, it will remove the child from danger. After which a guardian can make a decision on diagnoses and treatments of the child.

But the guardian would then need to agree with the treatments progressives favor.

So, while I urge the left to pick a side on this issue or at least acknowledge that CPS must be involved,they wont.

Theyd rather go to court. And cut out both parents and guardians.

Off-label use of drugs for treatment of gender dysphoria.

Lets look at the process that it would take to get hormones that are approved for cancer treatment and chemical sterilization approved by the FDA for use in treatment of gender dysphoria in children:

In a phase 1 clinical trial, the tolerability and safety of the new drug is studied, usually in a small number of healthy volunteers. Phase 2 is aimed at determining the drugs efficacy and optimal dosing regimen. After phase 2, the drug is entered into the next phase of testing in a phase 3 trial.

The main focus of phase 3 trials is to demonstrate and confirm the preliminary evidence gathered in the previous trials that the drug is, a safe, beneficial and effective treatment for the intended indication.

Phase 3 is the last phase of testing to be completed before the drugs details and clinical trial results are submitted to the regulatory authorities for approval of the drugs release on the open market. Phase 3 is therefore a vital phase of drug development and billions may be spent progressing the drug to a phase 3 trial, only for the drug to prove ineffective in a larger patient population or have serious safety concerns that prevent its approval.

Not going to happen.

Not because of the cost, but because the subjects of the trials would have to be children. And the hormone drugs in question are already known to be dangerous in their approved uses on adults. Read the warning labels.

One wonders where childrens hospital pharmacists and patient safety committees stand on this. Or if they have taken a position.

The suicide card. The Pilot, to seal the deal, plays the suicide card.

It asserts that transgender kids (along with the entire LGBTQ+ community of youth) are suicidal at epidemic rates. Yet it does not recommend broad suicide preventions policies. Which would make sense.

It simply recommends keeping information from parents that results in those children not being able to get professional help mental health help even without resorting to dangerous drugs or surgical procedures.

And thus increasing the probability of suicide.

The Pilot refers to theTrevor Project,a LGBTQ+ advocacy group with a mission to prevent suicide. I applaud that mission. I agree with much of what they recommend in Model School District Policy on Suicide Prevention. School divisions should review it.

Look in particular at the section on Sample Language for Student Handbook.

The only thing I would change is where it says help connect the student to appropriate local resources. I would substitute help connect the student and his parents/guardian to appropriate local resources. That mistake is repeated elsewhere.

But that work is far superior to Model Policies for theTreatment of Transgender Students in Virginias Public Schools. Which uses the word suicide twice in 23 pages of text.

A part of the Trevor Project suicide preventionModel Policywith which I respectfully disagree is:

Referrals and LGBTQ Youth

Information about a students sexual orientation or gender identity should be treated as confidential and not disclosed to parents, guardians, or third parties without the students permission.

In the case of parents who have exhibited rejecting behaviors, great sensitivity needs to be taken in what information is communicated with parents.

Additionally, when referring students to out-of-school resources, it is important to connect LGBTQ students with LGBTQ-affirming local health and mental health service providers. Affirming service providers are those that adhere to best practices guidelines regarding working with LGBTQ clients as specified by their professional association (e.g., apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/guidelines.aspx).

The Trevor Project, like others who advocate such policies, drifts through the complexities it raises without addressing them.

Where do progressives stand? The lefts positions on schools informing parents about the transgender expressions of a child are seemingly contradictory to a logical person:

The left seemingly must pick one. It would be interesting to see which they would choose. But they will continue to support both.

And seek court orders to get what they want in one step.

It gets worse. There is, unfortunately, a path to realizing that objective that does not go through parents and guardians. Progressive doctors and judges.

Doctors prescribed opioids to people for money. And went to jail for it.

So, there will be mental health professionals who will provide the gender dysphoria diagnosis on request. Because they believe in transgender support and diagnose any kid who exhibits transgender expression as gender dysphoric a necessary step to provide that support. That is not even illegal.

So, please dont contend that wont happen. Or has not already.

In America broadly and in Virginia, parents can make decisions regarding their childs medical treatment in everyday situations without state intervention. If the child is in a life-threatening health situation, a judge may put the child in state custody if the parent refuses medical treatment.

All the emphasis on LGBTQ youth suicide has two purposes:

Judge-shopping is a real thing in both progressive and conservative circles.

Some progressive judges will lean forward on this issue. Again, please dont contend none will do it. Read the papers.

If a progressive judge finds gender dysphoria life-threatening, he or she can overrule parental/guardian objections and order a diagnosis from a progressive mental health professional and then invasive treatments from doctors specializing in them. A progressive virtuous circle.

Recommendation for providers. I recommend childrens hospitals set internal requirements to get a court order for purposes of:

It would be even better if those hospitals sought a second opinion on the diagnosis outside of the hospital system and took it to the judge. Break the closed loop.

That will help a lot for systems determined to do what most of us think is the right thing. Which I suspect is most of them.

But as a practical matter, it is unlikely to be a problem for a progressive-run childrens hospital with progressive doctors inclined to both issue a diagnosis and provide the treatments to find a judge to order those treatments with parental or guardian concurrence.

Those institutions and their medical people already are doing the right thing as they perceive it.

They should get the court order anyway. See the reasons above.

Recommendations for the state.The Virginia law controlling sterilization of children applies only to surgery. Chemical sterilization is not addressed. There is no logical reason it is not. It just isnt.

That is what opens Virginia children up to be subjects of treatments with cross-gender hormones drugs known

Change the law to prohibit chemical sterilization of children. Make it a serious felony.

The issue of doing any treatmentsagainst the wishes of the parents or guardian also needs to be addressed.

I recommend Virginia specify in law that judges may not make a determination of a life- or health-threatening condition in the case of a child gender dysphoria diagnosis and use that finding toorder treatments of any sortwithout parental or guardian consent.

Or, in todays highly politicized environment, one certainly will.

Read more from the original source:
Progressives in Virginia In Position to Overrule Parental Objections to Invasive Child Gender Dysphoria Treatment - Bacon's Rebellion