Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

Progressives are beating Republicans on the crime debate – MSNBC

Often, it can feel like Democrats abandon debates about crime under a false assumption that they cant win them. But a couple of progressive Democrats are showing the rest of the party what it looks like to go toe-to-toe with Republicans on crime and public safety.

One of them is Stacey Abrams, the Democratic nominee for governor in Georgia. As The Associated Press reported, Abrams and her team are looking to make tightening gun laws and stemming gun crime a focus of her campaign. Some areas of Georgia have experienced a surge in violent crime over the past two years, thanks in large part to the proliferation of guns.

In recent months, Abrams has publicly tied gun policies backed by Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, to crime and public safety issues in the state.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is another progressive Democrat whos not ceding ground in the crime debate to Republicans.

Last week, Newsom announced hed made an account on former President Donald Trumps struggling social media platform Truth Social. His first post? A video addressing the red state murder problem, referencing data showing that states that voted for Trump in 2020 accounted for eight of the 10 highest murder rates that year.

I know were all on this platform in search for the truth, but the truth is, Ive not been able to find a simple explanation for the fact that we have a red state murder problem, Newsom said in the video.

To many progressives online, this was a welcomed troll attempt by a figure increasingly known for publicly and proudly opposing right-wing policies. Democrats should heed Abrams and Newsoms strategies here, because when it comes to policies designed to curb crime, they have the high ground over conservatives.

Progressive social welfare policies like providing affordable housing, accessible education, health care and supplementary income have proven to be deterrents from crime. On the other hand, lax gun measures supported by conservatives like the gun show loophole have been proven to drive crime throughout the United States and the Western Hemisphere. And studies have repeatedly shown that conservative-backed, tough on crime policies like capital punishment and harsh mandatory minimum sentences dont actually reduce crime or recidivism rates.

Abrams and Newsom are showing how Democrats can and must rebut Republican talking points about crime. Progressives need to frame the debate around the facts, which favor them. If they dont, Republicans will spin their own stories about crime and fancifully cast themselves as saviors.

Ja'han Jones is The ReidOut Blog writer. He's a futurist and multimedia producer focused on culture and politics. His previous projects include "Black Hair Defined" and the "Black Obituary Project."

View post:
Progressives are beating Republicans on the crime debate - MSNBC

Calling Justice Thomas ‘Uncle Clarence’ exposes the rotten sham that is the progressive movement – New York Post

A festering rot of racial animosity exists in our society that we willfully ignore socially and politically. It is a rot that eats away at the flesh of our civil society and spoils the greatness of our multicultural nation.

Progressives continually tell us we have blinders on when it comes to racism in American society. Theyve shoved their ideological solution of anti-racism to force us to deconstruct what they believe is an inherently deep-seated racist nation. I, as a black American, am supposed to rejoice in the presence of our self-appointed saviors, but I peeked behind the veil and saw who they really are.

Understandably, detractors of the decision have found themselves angry and anguished at last weeks Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade. Six judges found it necessary to overturn, but just one has been elected the face of all political animus: Clarence Thomas, who didnt even write the courts opinion.

They say that in times of stress, anger and anguish, you see who people really are. These moments are rare but special because you get to see how much of their rhetoric manifests in action and how much is lip service.

With overwhelming anger seeping through their pores, Democrats saw only one viable target who would satisfy their rage. There was only one person for whom they felt comfortable exposing themselves by lifting the veil of their true hatred and indifference for black people.

In a matter of hours, Uncle Clarence was trending on Twitter, a reference to the racist pejorative Uncle Tom. I witnessed multiple conversations between white progressives questioning if Clarence knows hes black, chastising him for being married to a white woman and even going so far as to feel completely comfortable calling him a nger.

Dont believe me? Do a Twitter search yourself.

Just one example: Left-wing Canadian pollster John Corbett tweeted, Clarence Thomas: Just another dumb field nger.

Even more disappointing, many black progressive Democrats stood by and said nothing. I listened to a Twitter Spaces discussion in which a white man said, verbatim, Clarence Thomas is a nger on a mostly black panel, and no one said a thing. Why would they allow this without pushback? Because they arent principled either.

White progressives feel emboldened to use racially inflammatory language like Uncle Tom and coon directed at black people who dont behave the way they feel is acceptably black because black progressives allow it to happen.

Samuel L. Jackson, for example, gave the racist bat signal to all his white elitist progressive allies when he tweeted, Hows Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!! Today, its Uncle Clarence, but tomorrow it can be Uncle Samuel, and thats the point hes missing.

Hows Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!!

You cannot claim to be pro-black while selectively caring about which black person takes racial abuse. You cannot claim to be anti-racist if some racism is OK with you. You do not have to support Clarence Thomas political positions to find something highly unconscionable about how the man has been treated based simply on his race.

The veil has been lifted, and this is who they are. The progressive movement is a sham along with its boutique anti-racism ideology. The deep-seated hatred that progressives claim exists among the American public actually rots inside them, not us.

While everyone else has had their fingers clamped firmly on their noses to avoid the stench, Ive been smelling this rot spread throughout my old political party for years. I used to believe Democrats were the party of fairness, liberal values and rationality, but theyve allowed the rot to spread to all their messaging and have willfully leaned into the stench.

Instead of being repelled by the putrid smell of superficial identity politics, theyve convinced themselves its a perfume-like fragrance everyone should enjoy. Theyve allowed racist leftist ideologues to smell up the joint, forcing many black Americans like me to choose political homelessness over a home that reeks of immorality.

This isnt about Clarence Thomas; it is about addressing what is right and what is moral. Thomas doesnt need my defense; hes a grown man and can handle himself when labeled a misbehaving Negro.

If you are OK with white people calling any black person a nger, you are part of the rot. If you are OK with white people calling black people they disagree with politically Uncle Toms, you are part of the rot. If you cannot smell the rot, it is because you are it.

The veil has been lifted; this is who they are. Believe them.

Adam B. Coleman is the author of Black Victim To Black Victor and founder of Wrong Speak Publishing.

Read more:
Calling Justice Thomas 'Uncle Clarence' exposes the rotten sham that is the progressive movement - New York Post

Californians are starting to reject progressive policiesbut not fast enough – New York Post

For two decades California politicians have promised to spend more money on mental health care, drug rehabilitation and housing, but the problem has only grown worse. Between 2010 and 2020, Californias homeless population increased 31% even as it has declined 18% in the rest of the US.

One reason Californians have not demanded change is because many of us are able to escape the chaos in the cities by living in hilly neighborhoods in a manner similar to the rich in the 2013 sci-fi movie, Elysium, where the wealthy leave Earth to dwell in a satellite in space, while the poor persist in violent shanty towns back on our planet.

I am one of those Californians. I am based in the Berkeley Hills and, like everyone who lives on a hill, I can go about my days without ever coming across somebody screaming psychotically at invisible enemies, overdosing on drugs or defecating on the sidewalk.

Over the last two years, when I would tell my neighbors I was writing a book on the homeless crisis, several wrinkled their faces and whispered, Thats why I dont go downtown. On Twitter, many people who claim to be progressive believe they have successfully debunked our documentation of human depravity in downtown San Francisco by posting selfies of themselves in front of the Golden Gate Bridge, or atop Lombard Street, where there arent homeless encampments.

But one of the biggest and least discussed reasons that Californians dont demand change is what one might call the Big Lebowski Syndrome, or BLS, for short. In the Coen Brothers 1998 cult classic, the main character, Jeffrey Lebowski (played by Jeff Bridges), calls himself the Dude. The Dude captures the liberal slacker energy of many Californians when it comes to homelessness.

When you raise the issue of, say, people camping on sidewalks, many progressive Californians say, Take it easy, man, one of the Dudes aphorisms. When you point out that it is neither compassionate nor safe to let mentally ill people and addicts sleep on sidewalks, many progressives just shake their heads. Take it easy, man. But even the Dude loses his cool when things become too chaotic, as has happened in Californias cities of late.

Nearly three weeks ago, California voters seemed to finally be saying no more to rampant crime and homelessness. On June 7, San Franciscos uber-liberal voters recalled the citys progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin for no longer prosecuting many crimes, including open air drug use and dealing. And, in the race for Los Angeles mayor, more voters initially seemed to have chosen Rick Caruso, a Republican-turned-Democrat developer over Rep. Karen Bass, a longtime leader of the states progressive Democratic machine.

But with the mail-in votes now being tallied, its clear that Californias future still remains on a political knife edge. The recall of DA Boudin was 55% in favor and 45% opposed, a far smaller margin of victory than the landslide 61% that advocates claimed on election night. And while Caruso first celebrated a primary win after vote counts showed him leading Bass 42% to 37%, that tally has since reversed, with Bass leading Caruso 43% to 36%. The final winner will be declared in a November run-off.

Whats more, LA voters elected members to the city council who are even more radical than the already progressive incumbents they defeated. Two of them advocate defunding the police while one advocates abolishing the force outright. All support maintaining, rather than removing, homeless encampments. The same is true for two of the candidates headed for November run-off elections for controller and city attorney.

Still, the backlash to crime and homelessness is slowly gaining steam in Americas most populous and liberal state. It is rare for voters anywhere to recall a sitting politician from office for his policies, much less a progressive politician in San Francisco.

And it is remarkable that liberal LA voters chose a white, male billionaire to compete in the mayoral run-off. Meanwhile, Los Angeles super-progressive District Attorney George Gasconis facing backlash after two police officers were fatally shot while responding to a possible stabbing at a motelearlier this month. A total of 35 cities in the Golden State have now issued a vote of no confidenceagainst Gascon, who is now also facing a possible recall.

Political identity remains a powerful mental shortcut for Californias voters, most of whom identify as Democrats. Most people dont think very long or hard about who they vote for, especially in the 2022 primary elections. In 2020, 71% of people in the city of Los Angeles and 85% of people in San Francisco voted for Joe Biden. And Governor Gavin Newsom is a shoe-in for re-election, and will likely defeat his Republican opponent by the same 62-38 vote margin that he won in 2018.

LAs liberal voters put a high premium on Bass being a black woman, while Carusos status as a rich white billionaire elicits a more mixed response, with his success earning him respect but also suspicion. Of the 18 political races in California that involved affluent candidates who self-financed their own campaigns, just one of them, mega-star Arnold Schwarzenegger, won. The most spectacular defeat belonged to eBay CEO Meg Whitman who spent $150 million of her own money in 2014 losing to Gov. Jerry Brown.

Both Bass and Caruso are warm, intelligent, and well-liked. An actress in Venice Beach summarized a widely-held attitude, telling me, When Bass came here for a campaign event, everybody liked her and nobody thought she would change anything. Peter Savodnik, an LA voter and political journalist, said, This thing is wide open. The fundamentals look good for Caruso for all the obvious reasons: crime, homelessness, the economy, housing and so forth. Even so, if he is to win, he needs a sharper message onhomelessness and crime.

Whatever the electoral outcome, California is gradually changing. Gov. Newsom has promised a whole new court system to deal with mentally ill homeless people, while Bass has called for a new psychiatric hospital and FEMA involvement in sheltering LAs 44,000 homeless people.

Californias cities need thousands more police officers and beds in shelters, rehab clinics and mental hospitals. It will take years to solve its problems. But, if Gascon is recalled, and Caruso is elected, California will get new leaders who at least recognize them.

Michael Shellenberger came in third as an independent candidate in Californias June 7 gubernatorial primary election and is the author of San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities.

Read the rest here:
Californians are starting to reject progressive policiesbut not fast enough - New York Post

What is ‘Womxn?’ Why progressives love, and hate, the term – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The term "womxn" has been adopted by some progressives since 2010 to serve as a more inclusive term for woman, but outlets and organizations who have used the term have faced backlash from those who believe it is exclusionary to the trans and non-binary community.

According to dictionary.com, womxn is "a woman (used, especially in intersectional feminism, as an alternative spelling to avoid the suggestion of sexism perceived in the sequences m-a-n and m-e-n, and to be inclusive of trans and nonbinary women)."

As early as 1975, the term "womyn" appeared in an issue of Lesbian Connection magazine, and was subsequently used by other organizations and publications. According to The University of California, Irvine's Womxns Center for Success, the term was "brought up in intersectional feminist spaces" beginning in 2010, with the Womxns March Seattle picking up the term in 2016.

SCOTUS PROLONGS HIGHLY-ANTICIPATED DECISION THAT COULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADE

LGBTQ rights supporters gather at the Texas State Capitol to protest state Republican-led efforts to pass legislation that would restrict the participation of transgender student athletes on Sept. 20, 2021, in Austin, Texas. (Tamir Kalifa/Getty Images)

A 2019 New York Times article asked "What Do Womxn Want?" proceeding to answer their own question: "Maybe not to have the word man in their word anymore!"

Some progressives have championed the term, using it as a more inclusive version of "woman."

Following a leaked draft Supreme Court opinion revealed that the landmark court case could be overturned, former First Lady Michelle Obama raised eyebrows in an Instagram post writing, "State lawmakers will have the power to strip womxn of the right to make decisions about their bodies and their healthcare."

LONDON MUSEUM SLAMMED AFTER PROMOTING EVENT TO WOMXN

Self-care brand Blume explained "why weve decided to use womxn instead of woman or women, andwhy you should too."

But, other organizations and outlets have faced backlash for using the term, particularly from other progressives who do not believe it is inclusive.

Athena Maxine holds a transgender pride flag during the annual Pride Portland! Parade in Portland, Maine, on June 15, 2019. (Ben McCanna/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images)

Girlboss.com explained that "Womxn Isnt Exactly the Inclusive Term you Think It Is," asserting that "While womxn may be helpful for some communities, its alienating for others-particularly trans and nonbinary people."

HILLARY CLINTON'S FLIP FLOP ON TRANSGENDER ISSUES: FROM HIGHEST PRIORITY TO SHOULD NOT BE A PRIORITY

A now-deleted tweet from Northwest Missouri State University referred to Womens History Month as "Womynx History Month," linking to a website explaining that the school used the term "Womynx" to "encourage inclusivity."

"Wtf is Womynx?? This is what people go into debt to learn?" the popular Twitter account LibsofTikTok tweeted.

Streaming platform Twitch backtracked plans to swap the word "woman" for "womxn" after facing backlash from those who felt the term inferred that trans women were not women.

"Womxn implies trans women arent real women and non-binary people are women, so its best to avoid using it if you want to make a safe space for trans people," an Insider opinion columnist wrote following the Twitch controversy.

A person holds up a flag during rally to protest the Trump administration's reported transgender proposal to narrow the definition of gender to male or female at birth, at City Hall in New York City. (REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo)

Twitch later apologized, writing on Twitter "we want to assure you that we have, and will continue to, work with the LGBTQIA+ community. Were still learning."

While the Insider opinion column noted the term is non-inclusive of trans women, author Canela Lopez said it "doesnt make sense" when referring to non-binary people.

"While some non-binary trans people do self-identify as womxn, saying "womxn" to refer to all non-binary people doesnt make sense," Lopez wrote.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Even the University of California, Irvine's Womxns Center for Success noted a problem on their website explaining the term.

"Most pronounce it like they are saying woman or women, but spell the singular and plural with the x. However, this raises the question if that actually is truly inclusive; members of the blind community may be left out if there is no audible way for them to hear this distinction," the site reads.

Kelsey Koberg is an Editor with Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to kelsey.koberg@fox.com and on Twitter: @KelseyKoberg.

Continued here:
What is 'Womxn?' Why progressives love, and hate, the term - Fox News

Progressives divided over county commissioner and sheriff races – Boulder Weekly

You might have noticed that the Boulder County ballot for the Democratic primary has only two contested races. As I was trying to figure how I was going to vote, Boulder Weekly news editor Will Brendza suggested that I devote my column to the subject.

I watched many candidate forums on Zoom and contacted quite a few activist friends. Unfortunately, almost all of my friends wanted to be anonymous. There were no stark differences on the issues between candidates in either race.

Commissioner Matt Jones has chosen not to run for a second term. Louisville Mayor and chemical engineer Ashley Stolzmann earned the support of Jones and was the first to announce that she was running.

Elaina Shively is supported by the other two commissioners, Marta Loachamin and Claire Levy. Shively is director for the Center for Prevention and Restorative Justice at the Boulder County District Attorneys office. She leads the states first addiction and mental health diversion program for the office so that people can get treatment rather than an automatic jail sentence.

Sheriff Joe Pelle is term-limited. Pelle recruited retired Boulder Police Deputy Chief Curtis Johnson to the sheriffs department last year, where he is currently division chief, and has endorsed Johnson as his successor. Louisville Police Chief David Hayes advocates a culture shift in the department. He notes that sheriffs office jail staff used tasers on two people who were in restraints and secured in the jail, and that two former deputies are currently serving time in the state prison for manslaughter (for the death of a young CU Boulder student who was in their custody). Johnson says he was at the Boulder Police Department when the student died and that there has been a significant policy change on tasering recently. However, Johnson says that after 20 years with the same leader, the sheriffs department needs it needs a little kick in the rear, some new energy.

An old friend and progressive activist who has decades of experience in the county gave me some insight. She wanted to be anonymous. We agreed that progressives are divided.

She said environmentalists are leaning toward (Stolzmann), and social and racial justice activists leaning toward (Shively) for county commissioner. There may be some who like the idea of a small town mayor like (Stolzmann) on the commission, and maybe others (like me) who like that (Shively) has a track record of working on progressive efforts within the county, and who possibly she has the ability to work well with a county staff that has had a lot of turnover.

With regard to the sheriffs race, she said, I think that (Hayes) shot himself in the foot at the NAACP forum by uttering all lives matter and resisting community ideas about policing. I see that (Johnson) publicly endorsed state legislation to require police communication to be unencrypted, and (Hayes) opposed it. When I met (Hayes), he seems to be sincerely interested in community-based mental health response, but (Johnson) also has clear ideas on how to improve mental health response.

We face multiple crises that demand urgent attention. The battle for democracy is being waged at the Jan. 6 hearings, but it can seem abstract. The fights over criminal justice and police brutality can be ignored if you are white and well-off.

It wasnt too long ago that the climate crisis was ignored, downplayed, denied. (Many right-wingers are still deniers.) Then suddenly it comes home with wild destructive floods, fire, drought. Last Dec. 30, the climate crisis hit Boulder County in the mouth.

In an interview in New York Magazine, climate scientist Daniel Swain said the Marshall Fire was something unique and horrifying. It was an urban firestorm. The most recent urban firestorms happened after the bombing of cities during World War II. In centuries past, cities with wooden buildings burned down frequently.

It wasnt a wildfire. It wasnt as bad as the Camp Fire in Paradise, California, in 2018, with 18,000 structures burned and 85 deaths. Swain says that fire was in the wildland-urban interfaceessentially, houses in the woods.

The Marshall Fire was different. It was subdivisions, tract homes, fire just tearing through suburban environments weve been taught to think of as safe in every way.

Both of the sheriff candidates lost their homes in the fire. As mayor of Louisville, Stoltzmann rapidly responded to save her community.

Of the multiple crises demanding our attention, climate change is a civilizational wake-up call, as Naomi Klein has said. But everything and every crisis is connected.

You need to hand in your ballot by 7 p.m. on Tuesday June 28. There are no Republicans running for Boulder County positions in this primary. I am still not sure how I will vote.

This opinion column does not necessarily reflect the views of Boulder Weekly.

***

Email: letters@boulderweekly.com

Here is the original post:
Progressives divided over county commissioner and sheriff races - Boulder Weekly