Archive for the ‘Quantum Computing’ Category

Leibniz QIC’s Mission to Coax Qubits and Bits to Work Together – HPCwire

Four years after passing the U.S. National Quantum Initiative Act and decades after early quantum development and commercialization efforts started think D-Wave Systems and IBM, for example the U.S. quantum landscape has become a roiling cauldron of diverse activity. Its perhaps too easy to forget that the U.S. is hardly alone in catching the quantum bug. Europe has also jumped into the fray, as have China, Japan, Canada, Australia and many others. No one wants to miss out on what could globally become a transformational technology.

One area that Europe is tackling sooner than the U.S. is work to fully integrate quantum computing with traditional HPC infrastructure. While theres an emerging consensus worldwide that quantum computing is likely to become just another accelerator in the heterogeneous advanced computing architecture, Europe is taking deliberate steps now to make this a reality and the Quantum Integration Center (QIC) at the Leibniz Supercomputing Center (LRZ) is an illustrative example.

Now turning two years old, the Leibniz QIC has two major objectives. Its meant to be a user facility providing access to a variety of quantum hardware and software and assist in their development. Nothing new there, and its still early on in standing up quantum systems. The second mission goal is to integrate quantum computing with Leibniz traditional computing infrastructure, which includes new AI technologies such as a Cerebras system.

The broad idea is that in the future, Leibniz Supercomputing Center users may submit jobs and not necessarily know which of the underlying hardware options are doing the number crunching. Quantum will be another accelerator in a mix of accelerators ready for work. Creating the blended infrastructure to do that efficiently is at the core of the Leibniz QICs mandate.

We are responsible for what were calling the Munich Quantum Software stack thats to be able to develop needed algorithms and software tools all the way through to running and managing applications on quantum resources and incorporating HPC. The HPC-QC integration is a big part of this. Also, well develop this capability in a qubit-modality-agnostic way, said Laura Schulz, head of Leibniz QIC, who was part of the team that wrote the strategic plan for the QIC.

At the end of the day, our users should be able to utilize this technology with the simplest, cleanest path available. Some users will care about what system theyre actually on, and will want to be able to fine-tune the pulses on those quantum systems. Then youve got the other spectrum, users, like many HPC users, that are not going to care as much about what theyre computing on; theyre going to care more about getting the performance.

Ambitious goals. Schulz recently briefed HPCwire on Leibniz QIC plans and progress. A key early milestone, said Schulz, is demonstrating a working HPC-QC stack.

Weve got an early quantum system (5-qubit) and we have an HPC test center [that comprise] a great testbed, literally sitting in the same room. If you came into the room, you see them literally next to each other. The first milestone is making sure that these systems are connected and that we can send jobs through the HPC to the QPU. It comes back to work on software development. We want to have these systems in place and to have the software to enable interaction not two different software stacks running independently, but a single source software. Then well get progressively better as we get other systems in, she said.

Though these are still early days, the Leibniz QIC has been growing rapidly. On the hardware side, it currently has a 5-qubit superconducting processor from IQM, simulators from Atos (QLM) and Intel (IQS) and will add more QPUs and types. For example, theres a 20-qubit system coming as part of the Q-Exa Project. At the moment, Leibniz QIC is focused on superconducting-based quantum processors but the broad goal is to avoid being locked into single qubit technology.

Were waiting on the neutral atoms; those are a little bit further down the timeline. For us, right now, its superconducting because it offers great opportunities for scaling. Each of these systems has its own flavor and benefits. Superconducting is great for scalability, but its not as stable. Ion trap has more stability, but you cant quite scale it as much.

We have these different systems that were building up and we are going on the postulate were going to have multiple types of QPUs in the ecosystem; theres not going to be one winner, right, and the technology is too new to bank on any one particular [approach]. But by having a suite of different types of modalities around, well be able to experiment, said Schulz, who was selected this year as an HPCwire Person to Watch.

Its worth noting the wide range of the Leibniz QICs constituency. It is part of one of six European supercomputing centers involved in Europes quantum computing development effort. It is also part of the Munich Quantum Valley(MQV). Heres how MQV describes itself:

As a hub between research, industry, funders, and the public, Munich Quantum Valley (MQV) is the crystallization point for the development of the full spectrum of quantum technologies. It promotes an efficient knowledge transfer from research to industry, establishes a network with international reach and provides tailor-made education and training opportunities in the fields of quantum science and technology.

Harnessing three of the most promising technology platforms superconducting, neutral-atom, and trapped-ion qubit systems Munich Quantum Valley will develop and operate competitive quantum computers in Bavaria. In a unique holistic approach researchers develop all layers, from hard- and software up to applications.

The Munich Quantum Valley collaboration unites research capacities and technology transfer power of three major universities and key research organizations: the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BAdW), the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (FhG), the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg (FAU), the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the Ludwig- Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen (LMU), the Max Planck Society (MPG), and the Technical University of Munich (TUM). Their joint work will advance quantum technologies at all levels for future use in science, research and industrial applications.

Think Silicon Valley focused on quantum. Perhaps more than in the U.S., the interplay between industry and government-funded programs is fundamental. For example, the MQV interchange with the Leibniz QIC is extensive said Schulz.

I havent paid as much attention to the American situation as much as I should. What impresses me about what I see happening in Europe is this early dedication to HPC-QC integration. We know that quantum is going to have to be trusted, and have to be fortified, and its going to come in to the supercomputing realm. I mean, quantum is high performance computing, right. Its going to end up as another accelerator capability.

The other thing that Ive noticed is the partnership with industry. And while there is some of the early hype, some overly ambitious promises and all, but what Im seeing, trend-wise, is the conversation is more tempered. We realize that theres a lot of possibilities here, but also realize weve got several steps to go to get to that potential promise. The companies that weve been interacting with have that mentality, they understand that the possibility is there, theyre doing these proof of concept projects, said Schulz.

Over time, of course, the market will determine which development approaches win. China has embarked on an aggressive centralized plan. The U.S. has a blend of DOE-funded National QIS Research Centers and a vigorous separate commercial quantum development community. Europe has a Quantum Technologies Flagship program and the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) which named LRZ as a quantum site.

At ground level, Schulz is busily ramping the Leibniz QIC. Staffing has been a challenge. Headcount is currently ~24 and headed north of 40 by year-end, hopes Schulz who is actively hiring. Its a multi-discipline group, with its share of physicists, but software workers currently comprise around 50 percent of the team. Theres also many external collaborations within the MQV.

Said Schulz, My team is kind of this microcosm of the community. Ive got computer scientists, software developers, electrical engineers, and quantum physicists, experimental and theoretical, I have this really nice little community that represents this bigger picture. Whats funny is some of the issues that we face as a team. We were just doing all of our annual reviews, and the HPC people were saying, Im good on the quantum more or less, but need to know a lot more about how this works. The quantum people were like, I really need to understand HPC more, for example how does the scheduling work? Were cross-training each other within our own team, to ensure that everybody has a baseline to understand how this comes together smartly.

Mixing quantum computing and traditional HPC in the same facility has also prompted new challenges.

Schulz said, With HPC, and energy efficiency, the whole infrastructure is already complex and has evolved on its own. But now weve got these cryostats that were taking care of and were having to change out the nitrogen on a particular schedule. Were having to learn how to calibrate these things and how to maintain the calibration. Were having to learn a whole new set of operational programs. We have to worry about all these other external factors humidity, temperature, electromagnetic radiation. This is a new instrument that we have for the compute and we have to figure out how to bring into an HPC center.

Some of this technology is coming straight out of the physics labs, and were going to startup companies for some of the early pieces of this. Weve got to try to help them understand what its going to take in their evolution and their form factors and their stability to be to be able to leave the system alone and have it function at the same level of care taking as is an HPC system.

During this developmental stage, creating a hybrid quantum-classical HPC infrastructure at Leibniz QIC is an all-hands-on-deck enterprise. Thats not practical long-term, said Schulz, We want to get to the point where we dont have to have trained and skilled experimental physicists on staff 24/7. Thats a little extreme to have dedicated experimental physicists taking care of these systems. We see ourselves, at this point, helping the maturation of these technologies where they can exist in an HPC center. Hopefully, as these systems become more commercially viable, were hoping to help them exist in a commercial market space.

Lately there has been buzz around chasing quantum advantage the notion of using quantum technology in a commercial application. Schulz urges both patience and a change in thinking.

When I hear quantum advantage, I know its usually used as metric for beating a classical computer in a particular application. I want to challenge that and suggest that there are other ways we should be thinking about quantum advantage. I think that for particular types of algorithms, for particular applications, or parts of an application, quantum is going to be fantastic or has the potential to be fantastic. However, thats when we have a real-world application, an assembly of algorithms involved, and all of that has to work together. Quantum may be able to take part of that load off of this overall application.

Im looking at it from the HPC-QC integration and how all of this works together. So, Im thinking about what is the HPC-QC advantage? What does that mean? I mentioned things like energy. So, energy may end up being an advantage for quantum over HPC. Theres other parameters that we should be thinking about. I know that everybodys been shooting for that (quantum advantage). I think that thats going to be a bit farther out. Lets be honest, you know, theres a lot of friction points that we have to sort out along the way.

It will be interesting to monitor how QC-HPC integration efforts proceed at Leibniz QIC. The notion of a single stack able to manage multiple qubit modalities and systems and traditional HPC resources together, seamlessly, is enticing. Stay tuned.

See the article here:
Leibniz QIC's Mission to Coax Qubits and Bits to Work Together - HPCwire

Here are the top Dutch-based Quantum technology startups to watch … – Silicon Canals

Image credit: Delft Circuits

The concepts of quantum mechanics, created in the early 20th century to describe nature at the size of atomic and subatomic particles, serve as the foundation for quantum technology.

Applications in encrypted transmission, disaster management through improved prediction, computers, simulations, science, medicine, cryptography, and medical imaging are just a few examples of how quantum technology can be used.

Even though the layman can be confused by definitions, the use of quantum technology in our everyday lives is all pervasive. From phones and computers to television and cars, applications of quantum technology can be found everywhere.

The Netherlands has of late become a hub of quantum technology research and application. Many startups in the country are working in the field to make the technology accessible and useful to humanity.

We have listed out the top quantum technology startups in the Netherlands. Do take a look:

Fermioniq is a quantum software company based in Amsterdam. Co-founded by Jorgen Sandig, Ido Niesen, Chris Cane, and Prof. Harry Buhrman, it is one of the top Dutch-based quantum technology startups with a highly competitive teamare the co-founders of Fermioniq.

The company makes softwares to run specifically on quantum computers.

QuiX Quantum is a photonic quantum technology startup based in Enschede, the Netherlands. Dr. Jelmer Renema, a specialist in quantum photonics, and a group of professors from the University of Twente formed the company in January 2019 with the help of Dr. Hans van den Vlekkert, a seasoned businessman and veteran of the photonics sector.

The company counts RAPH2Invest, FORWARD.one and Oost NL among its investors.

The companys product portfolio includes:

Founded in July 2021, QuantWare is a quantum technology startup with the single goal of growing the field, democratising hardware, and advancing the usability of the quantum computer.

The Dutch company focuses on the quickest route to practical quantum computation, building on its unrivalled know-how in scaling up superconducting QPUs. They are a cooperative business that collaborates with industry leaders and specialists to provide complementary solutions.

Their products include:

Qu & Co creates quantum software and algorithms. The company wants to make quantum advances while maintaining outstanding standards of objectivity.

The first quantum computing platform designed exclusively for chemistry and materials science, QUBEC, is made available to clients of Qu & Co.

QphoX is a quantum transduction company. The first quantum modem developed by OphoX will link quantum computers in a quantum network. The foundation of the upcoming quantum internet will be their technology.

Through optical interconnects operating at room temperature, it will enable remote communication between quantum computers. They use a mechanical intermediary resonator to couple microwave and optical photons to create a quantum transducer. This synchronised, reversible method is based on the piezoelectric and optomechanical effects.

Quantum chips must be conceived, made, and tested in order to achieve a commercial quantum advantage. Orange Quantum Systems is developing the test system and protocols to get important information on quantum chip performance.

The company also provides diagnostic tools to improve quantum chip design.

To ensure high-quality research in quantum technologies, 39 research funding organisations have come together to form QuantERA.

The programmes objectives are to:

Delft Circuits brings quantum technology to life in collaboration with their clients as an independent, committed supplier of quantum hardware. The companys products include:

By mapping exposures and executing real-time attack detection with their Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solution suite, QuompleX decreases cyber risk and attack surfaces.

Researchers from the Netherlands, Italy, and Austria are the firms participants.

View post:
Here are the top Dutch-based Quantum technology startups to watch ... - Silicon Canals

Rigetti Computing to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 … – GlobeNewswire

BERKELEY, Calif., March 13, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rigetti Computing, Inc. ("Rigetti" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: RGTI), a pioneer in hybrid quantum-classical computing, announced today that it will release fourth quarter and full year 2022 results on Monday, March 27, 2023, after market close. The Company will host a conference call to discuss its financial results and provide an update on its business operations at 5:00 p.m. ET the same day.

Key details regarding the call are as follows:

Call Date: Monday, March 27, 2023Call Time: 5:00 p.m. ET / 2:00 p.m. PT Webcast Link: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/253j86peLive Call Participant Link: https://register.vevent.com/register/BIad8e205fd89b44f08963dfd7de0ac595

Webcast InstructionsYou can listen to a live audio webcast of the conference call by visiting the Webcast Link above or the "Events & Presentations" section of the Company's Investor Relations website at https://investors.rigetti.com/. A replay of the conference call will be available at the same locations following the conclusion of the call for one year.

Live Call Participant InstructionsTo participate in the live call, you must register using the Live Call Participant Link above. Once registered, you will receive dial-in numbers and a unique PIN number. When you dial in, you will input your PIN and be routed into the call. If you register and forget your PIN, or lose the registration confirmation email, simply re-register to receive a new PIN.

About RigettiRigetti is a pioneer in full-stack quantum computing. The Company has operated quantum computers over the cloud since 2017 and serves global enterprise, government, and research clients through its Rigetti Quantum Cloud Services platform. The Companys proprietary quantum-classical infrastructure provides high performance integration with public and private clouds for practical quantum computing. Rigetti has developed the industrys first multi-chip quantum processor for scalable quantum computing systems. The Company designs and manufactures its chips in-house at Fab-1, the industrys first dedicated and integrated quantum device manufacturing facility. Learn more at http://www.rigetti.com.

ContactRigetti Computing Media Contact:press@rigetti.com

Rigetti Computing Investor Relations Contact:IR@Rigetti.com

Go here to read the rest:
Rigetti Computing to Report Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 ... - GlobeNewswire

The philosopher: A conversation with Grady Booch – InfoWorld

Grady Booch is a unique voice in computing, whose contributions encompass a wide range of interests. He introduced the Booch method, which led to his co-creation of the Unified Modeling Language. He also helped usher in the use of design patterns and agile methods and has written a large corpus of books and articles addressing software engineering and software architecture. Today, he is chief scientist for software engineering at IBM Research

Grady Booch, chief scientist for software engineering at IBM Research.

and is creating a documentary exploring the intersection of computing and what it means to be human at Computing: The Human Experience.

Our recent conversation touched on both practical and philosophical aspects of human-computer interaction and co-evolution, artificial intelligence, quantum machines, and Web3.

Tyson: Thanks for the chance to talk, Grady!

Theres so much to cover.Let me begin by asking something "of the moment." There has been an almost cultural war between object-oriented programming and functional programming. What is your take on this?

Booch: I had the opportunity to conduct an oral history with John Backusone of the pioneers of functional programmingin 2006 on behalf of the Computer History Museum. I asked John why functional programming didnt enter the mainstream, and his answer was perfect: Functional programming makes it easy to do hard things he said, but functional programming makes it very difficult to do easy things.

Functional Programming has a role to play: many web-centric software-intensive systems at global elastic scale are well-served with having some elements written in stateless form, and thats precisely what functional programming is good for. But remember this: thats still only a part of those systems, and furthermore, there is much, much more to the world of computing than web-centric systems at global elastic scale.

Tyson: Okay, let me leap across from the specific to the general: what is software? What is a computer?Why are these seemingly obvious things so significant?

Booch: If you were to have asked me that question at the turn of the centurythe start of the 1900s, I meanI would have said a computer is a person who computes, and as for software, I would have no idea what you meant. You see, the term computer was at first a personusually a womanliterally someone who calculated/computed. It wasnt until we began to devise machines in the mid 1900s that we replaced the activity of those squishy organic computers with relays, vacuum tubes, and and eventually transistors.

Even if we consider the Turing test, Alan had in mind the question of whether we could build a machine that duplicated the ability of a human to think. As for the term software, its etymology tells us a great deal about how astonishingly young the field of computing is. The term digital was first coined by George Stibitz in 1942, and the term software was introduced by John Tukey in 1952. Heres an easy way to distinguish the terms: when something goes wrong, hardware is the thing you kick and software is the thing you yell at.

Tyson: You said in our earlier chat that perhaps the most important outcome of our computing technology is that it compels us to examine what it means to be human. Would you continue that thought?

Booch: The story of computing is the story of humanity. This is a story of ambition, invention, creativity, vision, avarice, and serendipity, all powered by a refusal to accept the limits of our bodies and our minds. As we co-evolve with computing, the best of us and the worst of us is amplified, and along the way, we are challenged as to what it means to be intelligent, to be creative, to be conscious. We are on a journey to build computers in our own image, and that means we have to not only understand the essence of who we are, but we must also consider what makes us different.

Tyson: Babbage said, We may propose to execute, by means of machinery, the mechanical branch of these labours, reserving for pure intellect that which depends on the reasoning faculties. Where are we at in that journey?

Booch: Actually, I think his colleague, Ada Augusta, Countess of Lovelace, better understood the potential of computers than he ever did. The Analytical Engine does not occupy common ground with mere 'calculating machines,' she said. Rather, it holds a position wholly of its own. Ada recognized that the symbols manipulated by machines could mean something more than numbers. The field of computing has made astonishing progress since the time of Babbage and Lovelace and Boole, but still, we are a very young discipline, and in many ways we have just begun.

Tyson: Speaking of Babbage does lead naturally to Ada Lovelace.I notice a strong thread in your work of pointing out the sometimes hidden role women play in moving us forward.How do you think we as a society are doing on that front?

Booch: Poorly. There was a time in the earliest days of computing when women played a far larger role. Annie Jump Cannon was the lead among the Harvard Computers in the 1800s; the ENIAC was programmed mainly by five women; Grace Hopper pioneered the idea of compilers and high-order programming languages. Sadly, a variety of economic and social and political forces have reduced the number of women in the ranks of computing. A dear colleague, Mar Hicks, has written extensively on these factors. We must do better. Computing impacts individuals, communities, societies, civilizations, and as such there must be equitable representation of all voices to shape its future.

Tyson: AI, especially conversational AI, has really taken off recently.What do you think is the next phase in that story?

Booch: Remember ELIZA from the mid-1960s? This was an early natural language system that absolutely astonished the world in its ability to carry out Rogerian therapy or at least a fair illusion of it. Weve come a long way, owing to a perfect storm; the rise of abundant computational resources, the accumulation of vast lakes of data, and the discovery of algorithms for neural networks, particularly a recent architecture called a transformer. In many ways, that recent advances we have seen with systems such as ChatGPT, Bard, and (in the visual world), DALL-E and Stable Diffusion have come about by applying these three elements at scale.

The field of artificial intelligence has seen a number of vibrant springs and dismal winters over the years, but this time it seems different: there are a multitude of economically-interesting use cases that are fueling the field, and so in the coming years we will see these advances weave themselves into our world. Indeed, AI already has: every time we take a photograph, search for a product to buy, interact with some computerized appliance, we are likely using AI in one way or another.

Chat systems will incrementally get better. But, that being said, we are still generations away from creating synthetic minds. In that journey, it is important that we consider not just what our machines can do, but what they do to us. As Allen Newellone of the early pioneers of artificial intelligencenoted, computer technology offers the possibility of incorporating intelligent behavior in all the nooks and crannies of our world. With it, we could build an enchanted world. To put it somewhat poetically, software is the invisible writing that whispers the stories of possibility to our hardware and we are the storytellers. Its up to us to decide if those stories amplify us, or diminish us.

Tyson: Quantum computing is alongside AI in terms of its revolutionary potential.Do you think well have a similar breakthrough in quantum computers anytime soon?

Booch: The underlying assumption of science is that the cosmos is understandable; the underlying assumption of computing is that the cosmos is computable. As such, from the lens of computing, we can imagine new worlds, but to make those things manifest, we must make programs that run on physical machines. As such, we must abide by the laws of physics, and quantum computing, at this current stage in its development, is mostly trying to find ways to work within those laws.

Two things I must mention. First, quantum computing is a bit of a misnomer: we dont store information in its quantum state for very long, we just process it. As such, I prefer the term quantum processing not quantum computing. Second, theoretically, non-quantum computers and quantum devices are Turing equivalent. They both have the same computational potential, and each have particular advantages and efficiencies, with very different scalability, latency, resiliency, correctness, and risk. Quantum machines are particularly good at attacking what are called NP problems, problems that grow harder and harder as their size increases. As for breakthroughs, I prefer to see this as a world of steady, continuous, incremental progress advancing over solving some very hard problems of physics and engineering.

Tyson: Quantum computing leads me to cryptographywhere, almost as a side-effect, it is able to attack public-key algorithms.I get the sense you are wary of blockchains ethics.Would you talk a bit about cryptography and Web3?

Booch: Web3 is a flaming pile of feces orbiting a giant dripping hairball. Cryptocurrenciesones not backed by the full faith and credit of stable nation stateshave only a few meaningful use cases, particularly if you are a corrupt dictator of a nation with a broken economic system, or a fraud and scammer who wants to grow their wealth at the expense of greater fools. I was one of the original signatories of a letter to Congress in 2022 for a very good reason: these technologies are inherently dangerous, they are architecturally flawed, and they introduce an attack surface that threatens economies.

Tyson:You said, I hope we will also see some normalization with regards to the expectations of large language models. Would you elaborate?

Booch: I stand with Gary Marcus, Timnit Gebru, and many others in this: large language models such as GPT and its peers are just stochastic parrots, very clever and useful mechanisms that offer the illusion of coherence but at the expense of having absolutely no degree of understanding. There are indeed useful purposes for LLMs, but at the same time, we must be cognizant of their risks and limitations.

Tyson: What do you make of transhumanism?

Booch: Its a nice word that has little utility for me other than as something people use to sell books and to write clickbait articles. That being said, lets return to an earlier theme in our interview: what it means to be human. Conscience, sentience, sapience are all exquisite consequences of the laws of physics. It is likely that the cosmos is teeming with life; it is also likely that sentient life is a rare outcome; it is also unlikely that, in the fullness of time of the cosmos, that we are the only sentient beings. That being said, we are, you, me, everyone reading this, are sentient beings, born of star-stuff and able to contemplate ourselves. That, for me is enough.

Tyson: Do you think well ever see conscious machines? Or, perhaps, something that compels us to accept them as such?

Booch: My experience tells me that the mind is computable. Hence, yes, I have reason to believe that we will see synthetic minds. But not in my lifetime; or yours; or your children; or your childrens children. Remember, also, that this will likely happen incrementally, not with a bang, and as such, we will co-evolve with these new species.

Tyson: Everyone should look at your lists of books you've read.Knowing that you've read, A Universe of Consciousness gives me permission to ask: Do you hold a materialist viewpoint? (Or, falling completely into the realm of philosophy, What is consciousness?)

Booch: Let me put it this way: I have reason to believe I am conscious and sentient; I have reason to believe that you are, as well, because my theory of mind yields a consistency in our being. Reflecting Dennets point of view, consciousness is an illusion, but it is an exquisite illusion, one that enables me to see and be seen, know and be known, love and be loved. And for me, that is enough.

Originally posted here:
The philosopher: A conversation with Grady Booch - InfoWorld

Is the Indian govt developing quantum cyber-attack proof systems? – MediaNama.com

In response to a parliamentary question, the Indian government did not provide an explicit answer to whether it has developed systems capable of withstanding quantum cyber-attacks under the National Mission on Quantum Technologies and Applications. Responding to Congress MP Shashi Tharoor's written question on the matter yesterday, the Ministry of Science and Technology simply said: Yes Sir. Government is developing a proposal to initiate National Mission on Quantum Technologies & Applications with the objectives of building capabilities in Quantum Computing, Quantum Communication, Quantum Materials, Quantum Sensing and metrology. The Ministry added that the details and deliverables of the Mission, announced in the 2020-21 Budget, are yet to be finalised. Wait, what's quantum computing? Without delving too deeply into its physics, "quantum" here refers to quantum mechanicswhich is what the computer system uses to calculate an output. So, essentially, quantum computers use concepts of quantum physics and apply them to computers. The hope is that they'll help systems process things super fast. Or, as WIREDputs it, "the basic idea is to smash some barriers that limit the speed of existing computers by harnessing the counterintuitive physics of subatomic scales". Right, so why doquantum cyberattacks matter? Right now, much of the electronic information we send online is encrypted. This means information is coded to be unintelligible until the recipient gets it and decrypts or decodes the message using a specific key. Doing this ensures that a "computer system's information can't be stolen and read by someone who wants to use it for

Read this article:
Is the Indian govt developing quantum cyber-attack proof systems? - MediaNama.com