Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul defends Trump, says campaign finance is "incredibly …

Senator Rand Paul has dismissed the seriousness of alleged federal campaign finance crimes committed by President Donald Trump, arguing that the laws regarding these crimes are incredibly complicated and the penalties should be reduced.

The Republican congressman from Kentucky appeared on NBC News Sunday morning television program Meet the Press to discuss the allegations against Trump as well as other recent issues surrounding the president. On Friday, a sentencing memo for Trumps ex-lawyer Michael Cohen issued by federal prosecutors implicated the president for leading a criminal conspiracy, which involved paying off Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal using campaign funds.

Paul told host Chuck Todd that he didnt believe such violations should be treated so harshly, and should just be punished with fines.

There are thousands and thousands of rules, its incredibly complicated, campaign finance, he said, arguing that criminal penalties are not the best way to address such violations. He said he personally thinks that the punishment shouldnt be jail time, it ought to be a fine.

It just like a lot of other things weve done in Washington, Paul continued. Weve overcriminalized campaign finance.

Todd then pressed Paul about allegations that Cohen had circulated his false Congressional testimony in advance, suggesting that the president was aware that he would lie. The Senator asked for clarification about what exactly Cohen lied about, to which Todd pointed to the Trump Tower Moscow project.

I guess I dont quite understand it, Paul responded. I dont know whats illegal about trying to build a hotel in Russia I see no problem with someone running for president trying to build a hotel somewhere, he said. The senator pointed out that it would be different if the presidential candidate was offering something in exchange for approval of such a project. I havent heard any evidence of that, he said.

Todd then pressed Paul to explain why Cohens and Trumps stories about the project have changed in regards to the project, asking why someone would lie if they had nothing to hide. The senator responded by alleging prosecutorial abuse, suggesting that the probe pushed Cohen to pin dirt on the president.

President Donald Trump, right, acknowledges Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), left, prior to signing H.J. Res. 38, disapproving the rule submitted by the US Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on February 16, 2017 in Washington, DC Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

Maybe thats because the prosecutor is pressuring him, saying: Well, if you dont give us something on Trump, guess what, you get twenty years. If you give us something on Trump, you get four years, Paul said. I think were trying to make and find a crime, he argued.

Despite Pauls skepticism about the the accusations against Trump, other politicians and analysts disagree. Representative Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, told CBS News Face the Nation on Sunday that Trump may face the real prospect of jail time.

Until now, you had two different charges, allegations, whatever you want to call them, Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler of New York, the incoming chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a Saturday interview with The New York Times . One was collusion with the Russians. One was obstruction of justice and all that entails. And now you have a third that the president was at the center of a massive fraud against the American people.

Read the rest here:
Rand Paul defends Trump, says campaign finance is "incredibly ...

Rand Paul: No Republican Appetite for a Romney 2020 …

Incoming Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) publishedan op-ed on Tuesday, criticizing President Donald Trump.

Sen. Paul quickly took to Twitter on Wednesday, calling Romney a Big Government Republican.

Breitbart Newss Kristina Wong asked Sen. Paul if he thinks Romney will plan to run to challenge President Trump in 2020 or if he will endorse Trump for president.

Sen. Paul told Breitbart News he thinks there remains no appetite for a Romney presidential campaign in 2020. Paul emphasized that Trump won many traditionally Democrat states, while Romney could not win any of these states.

I think when you look back at presidential electoral politics, what was extraordinary about Trumps run was that he won Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, and no Republican has done that, and that includes Mitt Romney, Paul told Breitbart News.

Romney lostthe 2012 presidential election to former President Barack Obama by more than 100 electoral votes.

I think Trumps victory was an extraordinary one, and he did it by being, frankly, different, not being a run-of-the-mill establishment Republican. I dont think theres an appetite for a Romney run in the Republican party, nor do I think Mitt Romney-style big government establishment Republicanism is frankly popular enough to win in a general election, Paul continued.

During the press conference, Sen. Paul also contended that Romneys attack on Trump is bad for the Republican party and will make it difficult to get things done in the Senate.

The Kentucky conservative also stated that Romneys sentiment about the president does not represent Utah very well.

Further, Paul said Romneys opinion of Trump serves as a minority opinion in the Senate Republican conference.

I think youll find a vast majority [of GOP senators] will have wished he hadnt said it, Paul added.

Sen. Paul said that when he differs with the president on policy, he does not resort to attacking his character. Paul explained that although he may disagree with the president on tariffs, he will champion the presidents moves on tax cuts, as well as his decision to withdraw American troops from Syria.

Other prominent Republicans also attacked Romney in the wake of hisWashington Postop-ed.

Republican National Committee (RNC) chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, Romneys niece, criticizedthe Utah senator in a tweet on Wednesday.

POTUS is attacked and obstructed by the MSM media and Democrats 24/7. For an incoming Republican freshman senator to attack @realdonaldtrump as their first act feeds into what the Democrats and media want and is disappointing and unproductive, McDaniel tweeted:

See more here:
Rand Paul: No Republican Appetite for a Romney 2020 ...

Rand Paul airs his ‘Festivus’ grievances on Twitter

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., speaks to supporters gathered at The Champions of Liberty Rally in Hebron, Ky., in August.(Photo: Bryan Woolston, AP)

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul is keeping up with his annual celebration of "Festivus" byairing silly and semi-serious grievances at political opponents and alliesahead of Christmas Day.

"You'll be surprised to learn I have some grievances with people in Washington, fellow members and others," Paul tweeted on Sunday. "Its time to talk about them now, because its the holiday season."

Author Daniel O'KeefecreatedFestivus, the made-up Dec. 23 holiday popularized in the late 1990s by the TV sitcom"Seinfeld." Itcalls on people to voice disappointments with others over the past year.

Paul has been doing this on Twitter since 2016.

Among the targets of Kentucky's junior senator this year were President Trump's staffing problems, Republican Sens. Lindsay Graham and Ted Cruz, neo-conservative"warmongers" and liberals, in general. He also addedhis take on whether "Die Hard" is a Christmas movie.

One person noticeably absent on Paul's list was Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, who mocked the senator at the annual Fancy Farm picnic this year for being beaten up by hisneighbor, Rene Boucher, a retired physicianwho attacked the senator last year over yard debris.

Paul suffered five broken ribs and bruised lungs, and Boucher was sentenced to 30 days for assaulting a member of Congress.

But few others are spared Paul's dry wit.

The annual mix of jokes and biting criticism confused some followers of the libertarian-leaning senator's Twitter feed. Among those who didn't get what was going on wasNew York Times reporterMaggie Haberman who asked:"What is happening with this feed today?"

"Same thing as every Festivus Maggie," Doug Stafford, Paul's chief strategist, tweeted in response. "Follow along."

Like everything on social media, there are mixed reactions to Paul's attempt at humor, with some appreciating his Gen-X '90s nostalgia while others consider it obnoxious fodder.

But it's clear that Paulisn't letting it go.

One moment of bipartisanshipthat could lead to actual policy change during Pauls "Festivus" rant were his tweets about criminal justice reform, which Congress approved before the year ended.

Paul worked closely with Democratic U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, of New Jersey, on the legislation, and the two want to go further in overhauling the federal system, including U.S. marijuana laws,at least according to their online exchange.

You may like: Mitch McConnell says Senate will vote on criminal justice reform bill

Read this: GOP deputy misleading McConnell on criminal justice bill, advocate says

Reporter Phillip M. Bailey can be reached at502-582-4475 orpbailey@courierjournal.com. Support strong local journalism by subscribing today:courier-journal.com/philb.

Read or Share this story: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/24/rand-paul-airs-festivus-grievances-twitter/2406153002/

Originally posted here:
Rand Paul airs his 'Festivus' grievances on Twitter

Rand Paul praises US withdrawal from Syria | TheHill

"I am happy to see a President who can declare victory and bring our troops out of a war,"Paul wrote in a tweet.

I am happy to see a President who can declare victory and bring our troops out of a war. Its been a long time since that has happened. https://t.co/fEBb8080fK

The White House said in a statement Wednesday that the U.S. has "started returning United States troops home" from Syria and claimed victory over the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

"These victories over ISIS in Syria do not signal the end of the Global Coalition or its campaign. We have started returning United States troops home as we transition to the next phase of this campaign. The United States and our allies stand ready to re-engage at all levels to defend American interests whenever necessary," White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement.

Trump on Twitter appeared to toutthe removal of troops as he declared victory over ISIS.

We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency.

The decision was harshly criticized by Republicans including Rep. Adam KinzingerAdam Daniel KinzingerHillary Clinton slams Trump's Syria withdrawal: This President is putting our national security at grave risk Overnight Defense: Mattis stuns Washington with resignation | Letter highlights differences with Trump | Dems call exit 'scary' and 'bad news' | Trump defends Syria withdrawal | New reports say Trump weighing Afghan drawdown GOP lawmaker hits Trump after news of Mattis resignation: Thats what happens when you ignore sound military advice MORE (Ill.) and Sen.Lindsey Graham(S.C.), who said in a statement that removing troops would be an "Obama-like mistake."

"Staying there is an insurance policy against the reemergence of ISIS and destruction of our Kurdish allies who fought so bravely against them," said Graham, who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

See original here:
Rand Paul praises US withdrawal from Syria | TheHill

Transcript: Sen. Rand Paul on "Face the Nation," Nov. 18 …

The following is a transcript of the interview with Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky that aired Sunday, Nov. 18, 2018, on "Face the Nation."

MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to the news that the CIA has determined that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman personally ordered the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul joins us now from Bowling Green. Senator, the president says a final conclusion will be made this week by the U.S. government, but in a Fox interview he indicated that essentially murder can be forgiven if the kingdom provides economic benefit. Listen to this exchange.

*CLIP*

CHRIS WALLACE: What if the Crown Prince, speaking to you the president of the United States, directly lied to you about--

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well that he told me that he had nothing to do with it. He told me that, I would say maybe five times at different points.

CHRIS WALLACE: But what if he's lying?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: As recently as a few days ago.

CHRIS WALLACE: Do you just live with it because you need him?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well will anybody really know, all right? Will anybody really know, but he did have certainly people that were reasonably close to him and close to him that were probably involved. You saw we put on very heavy sanctions massive sanctions on a large group of people from Saudi Arabia. But at the same time we do have an ally and I want to stick with an ally that in many ways has been very good.

*END CLIP*

MARGARET BRENNAN: What do you make of the president's remarks?

SENATOR RAND PAUL: Well you know the Crown Prince, his brother, made a phone call to Khashoggi, the dissident that was killed and dismembered, and that phone call was to tell Khashoggi, "Hey it's fine. You can go to the consulate no one will harm you." Well, you know, we have the Crown Prince's brother making that phone call. I think we have other intelligence that may link brother's phone calls back to the Crown Prince. I think the evidence is overwhelming that the Crown Prince was involved and so no I don't think we can sweep this under the rug. The thing about sanctions is that I think sanctions are pretending to do something without really doing anything. Most of these people are in prison other than the Crown Prince. But the Crown Prince runs the country and we deal with him. If we put sanctions on people who are in prison. Are we really doing anything to punish them they're already in prison. We need to punish who ordered this. Who's in charge and really the only thing they understand over there is strength. I think they will see sanctions as weakness on the part of the president and if the president wants to act strongly he should cut off the arms sale not only because of the killing but until they stop bombing civilian populations. Secretary Pompeo told Saudi Arabia three weeks ago stop bombing civilian populations. Since then Saudi Arabia has bombed cities 200 times, they're not listening--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --you're talking about in Yemen.

SEN. PAUL: --they're indiscriminately bombing civilians.

SEN. PAUL: Yes in Yemen.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You're talking about in Yemen. I should point out Saudi Arabia disputes the reporting that there is a- there was a phone call between Prince Khaled and Jamal Khashoggi. They say that's just not true. But given the CIA assessment overall that says there was a role, do you think this needs to trigger some other kind of change in policy? You're on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, are you going to try to block the appointment of the appointed ambassador?

SEN PAUL: Realize the Saudis have told us a lot of things that were untrue. They told us it was a fistfight that went bad, they have told us he was alive, they had a body double there to try to trick people into believing he was still alive. So the Saudis have been duplicitous since the very beginning. Do we need to do more? Yes, but at the very least we need to quit selling arms to people who are lying to us--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --The President says that that's exactly why though, those arms sales are exactly why the relationship is important and he's not going to hurt the economic benefits.

SEN. PAUL: Here's my point. The arms sales don't make us safer. They make us less safe. When we sell arms to a foreign country, it should not ever be for jobs, it should be for our national security. The Saudis' involving us in their war in Yemen is a disaster. 17 million people live on the edge of starvation. If we get involved in another civil war in the Middle East, that's not good for our national security. That just drains our natural resources--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Can you do anything to stop it though?

SEN. PAUL: Yeah. Quit arming the Saudis. The Saudis are bombing to the tune of tens of thousands of bombs in Yemen--

MARGARET BRENNAN: But in Congress, is there anything you can do? Because the president says he's going to continue selling.

SEN. PAUL: Right. Yeah, I've introduced resolution after resolution to stop selling arms. We've done it twice and it's a privilege resolution meaning they can't prevent me from getting a vote. First time I got twenty something votes the second time with the help of a Democrat Senator Chris Murphy we got 47 votes. If we have another vote I think we could almost get to a veto proof majority, but guess what? They're not bringing any arms sales up right now--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

SEN. PAUL: --because they know we might beat them.

MARGARET BRENNAN: What about the ambassador who's been nominated here, General John Abizaid? You going vote to confirm him?

SEN. PAUL: I- I want to meet with him and I don't think that that really- my first impulse is not- that's not the way to sort of punish Saudi Arabia, by blocking an ambassador. I'm a big believer in dialogue and even with this I wouldn't stop trading oil with Saudi Arabia, but I would stop selling them arms. That's the first thing I would do. That doesn't disrupt trade, doesn't disrupt diplomacy. It just sends them a very strong message, we're not going to keep fueling your- your war in Yemen, which is a total disaster. And everybody saying there's no military solution and yet nobody's willing to do anything that would actually force Saudi Arabia to stop the war. If we were not refuel- not refueling, if we were not providing spare parts for their American made planes--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

SEN. PAUL: --the war would be over in a matter of months because you have to have a continuous supply of spare parts and people repair your planes and train your pilots. If we quit doing that, Saudi Arabia would quit bombing them within three or four months.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to get you on domestic policy. The president has put forward a- a- a proposal that has some bipartisan support on criminal justice reform. There's no guarantee it's going to be put to vote in the lame duck session and some of your fellow Republicans like Tom Cotton say this is just about letting felons out of jail. How do you respond?

SEN. PAUL: You know I've been- I've been working on criminal justice reform with Republicans and Democrats for six or seven years. I met with President Obama several times on this, bipartisan groups. We have a real chance to pass this now. With President Trump being in favor of- of this criminal justice reform, he came out publicly for it, really it only depends on one senator now. If Senator Mitch McConnell, from my home state, will allow a vote it gets 65 to 70 votes in the Senate. It'll be one of the most popular things to ever pass. Is it a jailbreak? No. It's saying people that have you know a nonviolent drug offense, that we don't keep them in jail for life. It's saying that 95 percent of people that get out of prison, when they get out of prison, do we want them to keep committing crimes or we should train them for jobs? Should we use programs to try to test whether or not we can teach people not to recommit crimes? And really do nonviolent people need to be in jail sometimes for life? We should--

MARGARET BRENNAN: So how--

SEN. PAUL: --reevaluate this.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So how do you force a vote? You're running out of time here.

SEN. PAUL: Well it- it's all up to one person. Senator McConnell has the ability to call any vote he wants to anytime. He has promised in the past that he would allow this vote if there was popularity for it. President Trump is behind it. In my state 86 percent of the people--

MARGARET BRENNAN: You're suggesting he's choosing not to?

SEN PAUL: --are behind this. The Fraternal Order of Police- Fraternal Order of Police are behind it. 2000 pastors, and I- I didn't get your follow up.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I said it-it-it seems like you're suggesting that he does not want to.

SEN. PAUL: There have been some articles, I haven't talked to him directly about it. The last time I talked to him about it, he said he was open to allowing a vote after the election.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

SEN. PAUL: Now with the President Trump- a-a-all in on this. I really hope we can get a vote but it's really up to Senator McConnell. But it's very very popular in Kentucky and very very popular with people who support President Trump so I hope he allows a vote.

MARGARET BRENNAN: We will watch for that. Thank you very much, Senator Paul.

SEN. PAUL: Thank you.

See the original post here:
Transcript: Sen. Rand Paul on "Face the Nation," Nov. 18 ...