Mediaboss Marketing

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) slammed President Donald Trumps decision to commit 4,000 more troops to Afghanistan in an op-ed for The Hill.

The mission in Afghanistan has lost its purpose, and I think it is a terrible idea to send any more troops into that war, he wrote on Tuesday. Its time to come home now.

Rand said that he would have voted to authorize this military action when Congress authorized the military to strike back against al-Qaeda after the September 11 terror attacks that took nearly 3,000 lives in 2001. Now, however, he feels the mission has shifted beyond the scope of what Congress approved.

Nation-building should not be our job, and it has consistently been a fools errand for use, particularly in this region, wrote Rand in his op-ed.

After President Trump announced during a televised address that there would be a troop increase in Afghanistan, Rand criticized the president for anti-war principles.

In the fall, Rand plans to propose an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would repeal the 2001-2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force. He also wants Congress to vote on deploying more troops to the Middle East again in the fall where he will be leading the charge for no.

There has been backlash from other conservatives as well, including enthusiastic Trump supporters like Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham. Both women objected to the troop increase.

It doesnt matter who you vote for. The military-industrial complex wins. Only difference: GOP presidents pronounce Pakistan correctly.

Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) August 22, 2017

Laura Ingraham praised Trumps speech but did not agree with the idea that America should continue to be involved in the Middle East.

I thought we were going to drain the swamp in Washington, not clear the desert in Afghanistan. https://t.co/gQFnQjoj0n

Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) August 22, 2017

Whos going to pay for it? What is our measure of success? We didnt win with 100K troops. How will we win with 4,000 more? https://t.co/XHj9GpJzaZ

Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) August 22, 2017

Anti-Trump republicans also criticized Trumps decision. CBS News reported that Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) accused Trump of having bowed to the military industrial establishment and doubled down on perpetual war.

Slightly more open to continued involvement in Afghanistan, Ohio governor John Kasich stuck to the stance he took during his 2016 presidential election campaign, according to CNN. The Ohio governor insisted that we need to begin to leave there while advocating for the option to conduct strikes based on intelligence gathering.

Increasing the number of U.S troops in Afghanistan may help the Afghan government strengthen its control of the country against the Taliban and an affiliate of Islamic State. The additional 4,000 American soldiers will continue to focus on training and advising Afghan forces.

Read the rest here:
Rand Paul Slams Afghanistan Troop Increase - The Liberty Conservative

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says that President Trumps decision to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan is a terrible idea that will leave more families with lost or injured love ones and add to the trillions of dollars that American taxpayers have already funneled into the 16-year-old war.

In an op-ed for the Hill, Mr. Paul, a Republican, said Congress must vote to revise the war authorization approved after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, while calling attempts at nation-building a fools errand, and lamenting that Mr. Trump is missing a chance to show more guts to end the military adventurism.

So I strongly disagree with the administrations actions here. Ive spoken to the president, and I know he wants to end this war. Weve all heard him say it. But talk wont get it done, Mr. Paul said. Although Ive been informed that the president rejected larger expansions of troops than the one announced this week, thats not good enough.

He should have rejected this one and stuck to his principles. He knows this war is over, and he unlike the last two presidents should have the guts to end it for real, on his watch, he said.

Mr. Trump announced Monday that he will be sending 4,000 more troops into Afghanistan.

We are not nation building again. We are killing terrorists, Mr. Trump said.

Mr. Paul has often found himself out of sync with defense hawks in his party.

See more here:
Sen. Rand Paul calls Trump's revised Afghanistan plan a ...

It is time to defy the critics and pass the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, which would be a momentous victory for accountability and transparency and send the establishment's head spinning, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul wrote in an opinion piece in The Daily Caller on Monday.

More popularly known as "Audit the Fed," the act would "open up the Fed's agreements with foreign governments and central banks, its discount window and open market operations, its member bank reserves, and its Federal Open Market Committee directives to thorough examination by the people's representatives for the first time since its creation in 1913," Paul wrote.

The act does this, Paul explained, by removing "the restraints on how the nonpartisan, independent Government Accountability Office can audit the Federal Reserve System, requiring the GAO to conduct an audit within one year of the bill's passage and report back to Congress within 90 days of finishing it."

Paul said that skeptics have said that since the nation's central bank is one of the most powerful institutions in Washington, passing such legislation would never be feasible, but the senator credited "grassroots Americans" for making sure that congressmen don't give up the struggle to make it into law.

The measure has already passed the House and last year missed reaching cloture by only seven votes.

Paul praised those supporting the bill as "concerned Americans who look down the road and wonder how much of our nation's prosperity and opportunity will be swallowed up by debt or lost in financial crises fueled by artificial market signals and central planners' economic tinkering."

The senator stressed that with Congress discussing soon how to institute long-overdue reforms to give Americans back more of their own money and get spending under control by changing how government operates, now is the perfect time to "call for an end to the Fed's secrecy surrounding operations that prop up the powerful and well-connected at the expense of the rest of us" and push the bill over the finish line.

2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Excerpt from:
Sen. Rand Paul: Time to Defy Critics and Pass 'Audit the Fed' Act

The Trump administration is increasing the number of troops in Afghanistan and, by doing so, keeping us involved even longer in a 16-year-old war that has long since gone past its time.

The mission in Afghanistan has lost its purpose, and I think it is a terrible idea to send any more troops into that war. Its time to come home now.

But as is typical, there was significant mission creep in Afghanistan. We went from striking back against those who attacked us, to regime change, to nation-building, to policing their country for them. And we do it all now with an authorization that is flimsy at best, with the reason blurred, and the costs now known. We do it with an authorization that was debated and passed before some of our newest military personnel were out of diapers. This isnt fair to them, to the American people, or to a rational foreign policy.

The Afghanistan war going beyond its original mission has an enormous cost. First and most important is the cost to our troops. Deaths, injuries and unnecessary deployments causing harm to families are certainly the most important reason as to why you dont go to wars that arent necessary.

Then comes the taxpayer. We have spent over $1 trillion in Afghanistan, and nearly $5 trillion on Middle East wars in the past 15 years. Would we not be better off with $5 trillion less in debt or using these funds in other, more productive ways?

Nation-building should not be our job, and it has consistently been a fools errand for us, particularly in this region. There is no reason to believe we can do it in Afghanistan, and certainly no reason to believe we can do it without a permanent, costly presence in the country.

So I strongly disagree with the administrations actions here. Ive spoken to the president, and I know he wants to end this war. Weve all heard him say it. But talk wont get it done. Although Ive been informed that the president rejected larger expansions of troops than the one announced this week, thats not good enough. He should have rejected this one and stuck to his principles. He knows this war is over, and he unlike the last two presidents should have the guts to end it for real, on his watch.

Regardless of the argument over the number of troops, I also will insist my colleagues take up a larger argument over the power to declare war. I believe we have allowed the executive to exercise far too much power in recent years.

This is one of the reasons I objected just before the recess when the Senate moved to consider the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). I have an amendment that I will insist be considered that would repeal the 2001 AUMF on Afghanistan. That AUMF is outdated, overcome by events, and provides a feeble bit of cover for people who still want to be there.

If the president and my colleagues want to continue the war in Afghanistan, then at the very least Congress should vote on it. Ill insist they do this fall, and Ill be leading the charge for no.

Paul is the junior senator from Kentucky.

The views expressed by this author are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

Continued here:
OPINION | Sen. Rand Paul: 16 years on, it's past time to bring our troops home from Afghanistan - The Hill (blog)

The mission in Afghanistan has lost its purpose, and I think it is a terrible idea to send any more troops into that war,Paul said in a statement.

The press release also pointed out that Rand has previously proposed an amendment to the NDAA to repeal the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMF) forcing Congress to vote on any further military action in Afghanistan.

His amendment expresses the sense of Congress that the President cannot conduct ongoing U.S. military operations in Afghanistan without an AUMF from Congress authorizing such conduct, the release reads. He strongly believes that if the President and Congress want to continue the war in Afghanistan, then at the very least Congress should vote on it.

Trump iswidely expectedto add between 3,000 and 4,000 U.S. troops to the roughly 8,400 currently in situ. Any additional troops would expand a current train-and-advise mission to Afghan troops fighting the Taliban and expand a counterterrorism mission to defeat Al Qaeda, the Islamic States affiliate in Afghanistan, as well as other terrorist organizations.

In 2014, Barack Obamaannouncedplans to withdraw all U.S. troops by the time he left office in January 2017. However, he later reversed his decision after the Taliban made a comeback, leaving 8,400 troops in the country.

You can follow Ben Kewon Facebook, on Twitter at@ben_kew,oremail him at bkew@breitbart.com

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

Continue reading here:
Rand Paul Opposes Troop Surge: 'Mission in Afghanistan Has Lost Its Purpose' - Breitbart News