Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul: Paris Climate Deal ‘Unfair’ [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul blasted the Parisclimate accord on CNN Thursday for being unfair to the United States and killing energy jobs.

Paul told CNN host Jake Tapper that Trump is right to pull out of the deal because other countries arent holding up their end of the bargain.

China doesnt have to play by the same rules, Paul said of the agreement. The debate should be over whether [the Paris accord] is fair. Is it fair for China to keep polluting at alarming rates and for us to be cutting back on carbon and China has to do nothing?

Is it fair that Russia gets to increase their carbon output 50 percent? he asked rhetorically.

He then guessed that most Americans are more interested in keeping their jobs than they are about alarmist climate change rhetoric.

Im betting you thatAmerica will say, we want jobs and we dont want these alarmists who are saying were gonna have mass extinction. So I think people want jobs and they want a clean environment.

WATCH:

The story has been updated with the correct name of the CNN host, Jake Tapper.

Follow Amber on Twitter

See the rest here:
Rand Paul: Paris Climate Deal 'Unfair' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

Rand Paul says there must be a ‘paper trail’ with unmasking …

Sen. Rand Paul said Tuesday that he believes there is a paper trail regarding the unmasking of American citizens in the intelligence community.

Careful logs are kept about this, Im told, so if Susan Rice unmasked anybody we should have a record of it, he told Fox News. I guarantee there is paper trail of all of this.

Mr. Paul also said he was the the victim of intelligence eavesdropping, but he doesnt know why his conversations would be of interest to the intelligence community, unless it was politically motivated.

I have no idea. I really dont have any ties to Russia surely, I dont believe Ive met the ambassador. I might have met him once at a reception. But for them to draw a link from me to any foreign country would be a real stretch. I dont know why they would have unless its for political purposes.

See the rest here:
Rand Paul says there must be a 'paper trail' with unmasking ...

Rand Paul has a tense exchange with DHS head John Kelly over US citizens having their phones seized at the border – Rare.us

Sen. Rand Paul took Department of Homeland Security Chief John Kelly to task during a senate panel on Tuesday over his agencys practice of seizing citizens phones when trying to re-enter the U.S.

The last time you were here we talked about citizens coming across the border and being threatened with non-entry or detention if they did not divulge the contents of their phone, Paul said to Kelly.

And your response was, I just dont believe were doing it.

RELATED:Rand Paul: We should repeal Obamacare like Republicans promised, not just fix it

Paul continued, So we asked some questions in writing and were still waiting on the response, and its been about six weeks or so. But I thought I would list for you a couple of the public episodes of this happening.

Sen. Paul listed specific cases of this occurring:

This year a NASA engineer, and a U.S. citizen, was pulled aside after coming back from Chile. They demanded the pin for his phone and they handed him a form that explained how CBP (Customs and Border Protection) had the right to copy the contents of his phoneall the contents of his phone.

Two citizens were returning from Canada. NBC did an investigation of 25 different cases of U.S. citizens being told to turn over their phones, unlock them or provide passwords.

A U.S. citizen was taken off of a flight in L.A. handcuffed and released after a Homeland Security agent looked through his phone for 15 minutes.

A U.S. citizen journalist also had their phone taken.

Paul concluded his examples with, So I guess my question is, is your answer still I just dont believe were doing it?

We dont do it routinely unless there is a reason why, so thats a change, responded Kelly. We do it whether they are citizens or non-citizens coming in.

Of the million or so people that come into the country, half of one percent is checked, and always according to the law, Kelly said. Now, typically, the officers who are engaged in the frontline defense at the ports of entry, in their questioning of individuals for whatever has tipped them off will cause them to have certain conversations [] but again senator, very seldom done and always for a reason and always within the law, Kelly added.

Youre just fine with the policy that arbitrarily takes someones phone and says you cant come back into the country? Paul asked.

Not arbitrarily; theres a reason why they do it, senator, Kelly responded.

Well, no, the thing is, it is arbitrary, unless there are rules as to how you do it, Paul replied. What are the rules? In our country, if you want to look at my phone, you call a judge, in my country. You know, so, this wouldnt necessarily be American jurisprudence if youre just saying we might have some internal rules. Have you published what your rules are?

Whether theyre published or not, or specific enough to publish, I dont know but I can certainly get back to you, Kelly said.

Paul voiced his dissatisfaction, I can tell you Im not happy with the policy and I wish it were different, and we have actually introduced legislation to try to stop you from doing this, and to make you go to a court, the way we do it in our country typically.

We go to a court and you ask a judge, and you have to present evidence, Paul said.

RELATED:Rand Paul and Ron Wyden introduce a bill that would stop warrantless phone searches at the border

The senator seemed to imply that these phone searches have become so commonplace that some have been advising U.S. travelers to leave their phones at home with traveling outside the country.

People are now talking, Paul said. There are people giving you advice to not take your phone abroad because when you come back home your country wont let you come home unless you let them look at your entire life.

I think theres a point of which we give up so much of our liberty to travel, thathas it been worth it? Paul asked.

We can live in a secure state if we clampdown and we have no freedom to travel, and we give up all of our privacy to travel, Paul added. I just dont think thats necessary.

Paul and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Or.) introduced the Protecting Data at the Border Act in April, which would make it illegal for border or law enforcement officials to search or seize U.S. citizens data via their phones or other devices without probable cause.

Disclosure: I co-authored the 2011 book The Tea Party Goes to Washington with Sen. Rand Paul.

Read more from the original source:
Rand Paul has a tense exchange with DHS head John Kelly over US citizens having their phones seized at the border - Rare.us

Rand Paul: All leakers must be found | TheHill – The Hill

Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulRand Paul spokesman: Lindsey Graham doesn't speak for us Graham: Rand Paul is 'irretrievably gone' on healthcare Graham: GOP ObamaCare repeal likely to fail MORE (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said that those leaking information need to be found.

"We just can't have everybody in the intelligence community, they have such power to suck up every bit of every transmission, every communication we ever made, we can't just have them willy-nilly releasing that to the public," Paul said on "Fox & Friends."

"All of them have to be found, and I guarantee there's a paper or a computer trail of who released these documents and who released these conversations."

.@RandPaul: All of the leakers have to be found. We can't have intel officials willy-nilly releasing classified information to the public. pic.twitter.com/tV5wVEgkGX

The Department of Justice announcedMondayit is charging Reality Leigh Winner, afederal government contractor with top security clearance, for leaking classified materials to a news outlet.

They have got to get after theseleaks, Chaffetz told host Martha MacCallum on "The Story" on Fox. I want people in handcuffs and Iwant to see people behind bars.

Continued here:
Rand Paul: All leakers must be found | TheHill - The Hill

Graham: Rand Paul is ‘irretrievably gone’ on healthcare – The Hill

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamAir Force chief says delayed Trump nominations make her job 'difficult' Rand Paul spokesman: Lindsey Graham doesn't speak for us McConnell: Senate will move ObamaCare repeal bill in 'near future' MORE (R-S.C.) said Tuesday that the GOP has already suffered a key defection on its healthcare reform bill and it may make sense to move past the issue sooner instead of later.

Were stuck. We cant get there from here, Graham told reporters. Im very leery of a healthcare bill passing the Senate that can get through the House. Weve already lost Rand PaulRand PaulRand Paul spokesman: Lindsey Graham doesn't speak for us Graham: Rand Paul is 'irretrievably gone' on healthcare Graham: GOP ObamaCare repeal likely to fail MORE, so were down to 51.

Graham said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is irretrievably gone, meaning GOP leaders can only afford one more defection and still pass legislation repealing and replacing ObamaCare.

While we do have a press assistant opening in the Communications Department, Senator Graham has not applied and should not make public statements on behalf of Senator Rand Paul, Paul spokesman Sergio Gor said in a statement, however. Senator Paul remains optimistic the bill can be improved in the days ahead and is keeping an open mind.

Republicans control 52 seats in the Senate, and Vice President Mike PenceMike (Michael) Richard PenceGraham: Rand Paul is 'irretrievably gone' on healthcare Karen Pence, Agriculture secretary install beehive at VP's residence Pence on NATO: 'Our commitment is unwavering' MORE can break a 50-50 tie, but three GOP no votes would spell the end of the legislation.

Graham is the latest Republican senator to publicly express doubt over the Senates ability to pass a healthcare reform bill that has any chance of later passing the House and becoming law.

Theres growing concern within the GOP conference that they will end up spending too much time on a healthcare debate that goes nowhere and will then have less chance of overhauling the tax code, another top priority.

Graham said if the Congressional Budget Office score for the Senate healthcare bill is as negative as its analysis for the House-passed measure, were in trouble.

We need to bring this to an end and move to taxes, he said. A lot of the blame is on the Congress here.

Sen. Richard BurrRichard BurrComey's Thursday hearing will be only public testimony Flynn hands over more than 600 pages of documents to Senate Intel: report Graham: Rand Paul is 'irretrievably gone' on healthcare MORE (R-N.C.), one of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellRand Paul spokesman: Lindsey Graham doesn't speak for us McCain to question Comey at intel hearing: report McConnell: Senate will move ObamaCare repeal bill in 'near future' MOREs (R-Ky.) closest allies in the Senate GOP conference, last week said he did not think the Senate would be able to pass a comprehensive healthcare reform bill this year.

I think its unlikely we will get a healthcare bill, Burr told a local television station, calling the House bill dead on arrival and not a good plan.

McConnell told Reuters last month that he does not yet know how he will find 50 votes to pass a healthcare overhaul, a comment that was interpreted among Senate Republicans as lowering expectations for a legislative victory.

Graham said on Tuesday Republicans should let ObamaCare collapse and then work with Democrats to find a better solution.

He added that the GOP should move quickly to taxes.

On taxes, that needs to be the next agenda item. We need to do it in calendar year 2017, he said.

--Jordain Carney contributed to this report, which was updated at 3:22 p.m.

Read more here:
Graham: Rand Paul is 'irretrievably gone' on healthcare - The Hill