Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Sen. Rand Paul Leads Bipartisan Charge Against Trump’s Saudi Weapons Deal – The Liberty Conservative


The Liberty Conservative
Sen. Rand Paul Leads Bipartisan Charge Against Trump's Saudi Weapons Deal
The Liberty Conservative
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has assembled an impressive bipartisan coalition in the Senate to block part of President Trump's Saudi weapons deal. Paul is concerned that the deal may cause blowback due to an ongoing Saudi Arabian military conflict with Yemen ...

More:
Sen. Rand Paul Leads Bipartisan Charge Against Trump's Saudi Weapons Deal - The Liberty Conservative

Rand Paul Plans To Block Part Of Trump’s Saudi Arms Deal – The Daily Caller

Several senators want to block a weapons sale to Saudi Arabia, part of a much larger package of arms sales touted by President Donald Trump.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Connecticut Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy hope to vote on whether to approve a package of weapons sales as early as Thursday, Politico reports.

Paul and Murphy argue that selling weapons to Saudi Arabia effectively involves the U.S. in a proxy war in Yemen, where Saudi backed forces have reportedly killed thousands of civilians and fueled the riseISIS and al-Qaida.

The senators expect support from most Democrats and a few Republicans. Paul believesthe general public is with us, according to Politico.

I think, if you were to ask the general public, should we be at war in Yemen or supporting war in Yemen, I think most people would say, where?' Paul said. I think there should be a valid debate on it.

Trumps massive arms deal is less of a deal and more of a collection of signed letters of intent, according to a report from the Brookings Institute. The $100 billion figure includes contracts finalized before Trump was elected.

Former President Barack Obama approved a total of $115 billion in sales to Saudi Arabia during his two terms.(RELATED: Trumps $100 Billion Weapons Sale To Saudi Arabia Would Be Largest In History)

The vote on the arms deal couldbe a lot closer than previous attempts to stall weapons sales to Saudi Arabia. Paul and Murphy pushed the Senate to voteon a $1.15 billion deal September 2016, which allowed the agreement to go through in a71- 27procedural vote. Congress has 30 days to review military sales to non-NATO countries under the Arms Export Control Act.

Paul and Murphy also proposed a resolution prohibiting any weapons sales to Saudi Arabia in May. That bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

The Department of State has notified Congress of several potential military sales to Saudi Arabia in the past few weeks, including training programs for the Saudi Navy and Air Force, and a $662 million for a packageof offensive shells and projectiles and launching equipment.

Follow Thomas Phippen on Twitter

Send tips to [emailprotected].

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].

Go here to see the original:
Rand Paul Plans To Block Part Of Trump's Saudi Arms Deal - The Daily Caller

Rand Paul: Paris Climate Deal ‘Unfair’ [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul blasted the Parisclimate accord on CNN Thursday for being unfair to the United States and killing energy jobs.

Paul told CNN host Jake Tapper that Trump is right to pull out of the deal because other countries arent holding up their end of the bargain.

China doesnt have to play by the same rules, Paul said of the agreement. The debate should be over whether [the Paris accord] is fair. Is it fair for China to keep polluting at alarming rates and for us to be cutting back on carbon and China has to do nothing?

Is it fair that Russia gets to increase their carbon output 50 percent? he asked rhetorically.

He then guessed that most Americans are more interested in keeping their jobs than they are about alarmist climate change rhetoric.

Im betting you thatAmerica will say, we want jobs and we dont want these alarmists who are saying were gonna have mass extinction. So I think people want jobs and they want a clean environment.

WATCH:

The story has been updated with the correct name of the CNN host, Jake Tapper.

Follow Amber on Twitter

See the rest here:
Rand Paul: Paris Climate Deal 'Unfair' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

Rand Paul says there must be a ‘paper trail’ with unmasking …

Sen. Rand Paul said Tuesday that he believes there is a paper trail regarding the unmasking of American citizens in the intelligence community.

Careful logs are kept about this, Im told, so if Susan Rice unmasked anybody we should have a record of it, he told Fox News. I guarantee there is paper trail of all of this.

Mr. Paul also said he was the the victim of intelligence eavesdropping, but he doesnt know why his conversations would be of interest to the intelligence community, unless it was politically motivated.

I have no idea. I really dont have any ties to Russia surely, I dont believe Ive met the ambassador. I might have met him once at a reception. But for them to draw a link from me to any foreign country would be a real stretch. I dont know why they would have unless its for political purposes.

See the rest here:
Rand Paul says there must be a 'paper trail' with unmasking ...

Rand Paul has a tense exchange with DHS head John Kelly over US citizens having their phones seized at the border – Rare.us

Sen. Rand Paul took Department of Homeland Security Chief John Kelly to task during a senate panel on Tuesday over his agencys practice of seizing citizens phones when trying to re-enter the U.S.

The last time you were here we talked about citizens coming across the border and being threatened with non-entry or detention if they did not divulge the contents of their phone, Paul said to Kelly.

And your response was, I just dont believe were doing it.

RELATED:Rand Paul: We should repeal Obamacare like Republicans promised, not just fix it

Paul continued, So we asked some questions in writing and were still waiting on the response, and its been about six weeks or so. But I thought I would list for you a couple of the public episodes of this happening.

Sen. Paul listed specific cases of this occurring:

This year a NASA engineer, and a U.S. citizen, was pulled aside after coming back from Chile. They demanded the pin for his phone and they handed him a form that explained how CBP (Customs and Border Protection) had the right to copy the contents of his phoneall the contents of his phone.

Two citizens were returning from Canada. NBC did an investigation of 25 different cases of U.S. citizens being told to turn over their phones, unlock them or provide passwords.

A U.S. citizen was taken off of a flight in L.A. handcuffed and released after a Homeland Security agent looked through his phone for 15 minutes.

A U.S. citizen journalist also had their phone taken.

Paul concluded his examples with, So I guess my question is, is your answer still I just dont believe were doing it?

We dont do it routinely unless there is a reason why, so thats a change, responded Kelly. We do it whether they are citizens or non-citizens coming in.

Of the million or so people that come into the country, half of one percent is checked, and always according to the law, Kelly said. Now, typically, the officers who are engaged in the frontline defense at the ports of entry, in their questioning of individuals for whatever has tipped them off will cause them to have certain conversations [] but again senator, very seldom done and always for a reason and always within the law, Kelly added.

Youre just fine with the policy that arbitrarily takes someones phone and says you cant come back into the country? Paul asked.

Not arbitrarily; theres a reason why they do it, senator, Kelly responded.

Well, no, the thing is, it is arbitrary, unless there are rules as to how you do it, Paul replied. What are the rules? In our country, if you want to look at my phone, you call a judge, in my country. You know, so, this wouldnt necessarily be American jurisprudence if youre just saying we might have some internal rules. Have you published what your rules are?

Whether theyre published or not, or specific enough to publish, I dont know but I can certainly get back to you, Kelly said.

Paul voiced his dissatisfaction, I can tell you Im not happy with the policy and I wish it were different, and we have actually introduced legislation to try to stop you from doing this, and to make you go to a court, the way we do it in our country typically.

We go to a court and you ask a judge, and you have to present evidence, Paul said.

RELATED:Rand Paul and Ron Wyden introduce a bill that would stop warrantless phone searches at the border

The senator seemed to imply that these phone searches have become so commonplace that some have been advising U.S. travelers to leave their phones at home with traveling outside the country.

People are now talking, Paul said. There are people giving you advice to not take your phone abroad because when you come back home your country wont let you come home unless you let them look at your entire life.

I think theres a point of which we give up so much of our liberty to travel, thathas it been worth it? Paul asked.

We can live in a secure state if we clampdown and we have no freedom to travel, and we give up all of our privacy to travel, Paul added. I just dont think thats necessary.

Paul and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Or.) introduced the Protecting Data at the Border Act in April, which would make it illegal for border or law enforcement officials to search or seize U.S. citizens data via their phones or other devices without probable cause.

Disclosure: I co-authored the 2011 book The Tea Party Goes to Washington with Sen. Rand Paul.

Read more from the original source:
Rand Paul has a tense exchange with DHS head John Kelly over US citizens having their phones seized at the border - Rare.us