Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul and Cory Booker push bipartisan effort to limit solitary confinement for juveniles – TheBlaze.com

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) andSen Cory Booker (D-NJ) have teamed up to tackle criminal justice reform once again, this time to restrict the usage of solitary confinement to special cases in juvenile inmates.

Paul and Bookers S-239 has been seen before, namely in 2014 when the two senators introduced a bill calledthe REDEEM act, which sought an overhaul of the criminal justice system to be more lenient of non-violent offenders, specificallyjuveniles. In 2016, then President Obama went forward with his own changes to the criminal justice system, which put a stop to solitary confinement for juveniles. Both Paul and Booker applauded the move, however, Obamas measure was a temporary hold. Thus Paul and Booker are once again acting to pass a law to put a stop to it.

While criminal justice reform has always been an issue Paul is famous for tackling, solitary confinement is one of the more cruel and unusual methods used in our prison systems that Paul wishes to put a stop to, and for good reason. As Stuart Grassian explained to PBS, the psychiatric effects are devastating. Especially if prolonged.

Stuart Grassian, a board-certified psychiatrist and a former faculty member at Harvard Medical School, has interviewed hundreds of prisoners in solitary confinement. In one study, he found that roughly a third of solitary inmates were actively psychotic and/or acutely suicidal. Grassian has since concluded that solitary can cause a specific psychiatric syndrome, characterized by hallucinations; panic attacks; overt paranoia; diminished impulse control; hypersensitivity to external stimuli; and difficulties with thinking, concentration and memory. Some inmates lose the ability to maintain a state of alertness, while others develop crippling obsessions.

As it stands, the bill has found cosponsors inSenators Mike Lee (R-UT), Richard Durbin (D-IL), James Lankford (R-OK), and Robert Casey (D-PA), truly setting the tone for a bipartisan effort to end solitary confinement for the youth, however, some are worried about Trumps tough on crime stance putting this bill down before it can become law.

Read the original post:
Rand Paul and Cory Booker push bipartisan effort to limit solitary confinement for juveniles - TheBlaze.com

Sen. Rand Paul: ‘I Think Civil Asset Forfeiture Is a Terrible Idea Until You’ve Convicted Someone’ – CNSNews.com

Sen. Rand Paul: 'I Think Civil Asset Forfeiture Is a Terrible Idea Until You've Convicted Someone'
CNSNews.com
(CNSNews.com) Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told C-SPAN's Newsmakers on Sunday that he thinks civil asset forfeiture where police can seize, then keep or sell any property they suspect is involved in a crime regardless of whether or not the owner is ...

Link:
Sen. Rand Paul: 'I Think Civil Asset Forfeiture Is a Terrible Idea Until You've Convicted Someone' - CNSNews.com

How Rand Paul Is Navigating The Trump Presidency – BuzzFeed News

Drew Angerer / Getty Images

ID: 10519186

WASHINGTON Days before dropping out of the presidential race in 2016, Sen. Rand Paul, who appeared angry and frustrated for much of his White House bid, went on a late-night show and called Donald Trump a delusional narcissist and orange-faced windbag.

These days, Paul is no longer comparing the now-president to Gollum or calling him names. He isnt really bashing him at all. He has, in fact, begun the complicated navigation of trying to sway Trump and Republican policy in the direction he wants it to go even if Paul has far less outward power than he did just two years ago.

Without the burdens of a presidential bid weighing him down, Paul walks around the Senate occasionally sporting his black mock turtleneck with an unmistakable air of freedom and a new sense of determination to mold the GOP-controlled agenda as Trump quickly remakes the political normal. Paul finally feels comfortable, as one former aide put it. At a reception to celebrate the start of his second term in the Senate, Paul allies some of whom had not seen him since the presidential race described an energized senator who now saw real opportunity and power in the Senate under a Republican president.

Now that Republicans hold the White House and a narrow majority in the Senate, Paul believes he actually has the ability to influence policy in his second term instead of just being a libertarian troublemaker, sources close to him say. His GOP colleagues, Paul allies say, now need him more than they did before, and he plans on making the most of that advantage.

The Kentucky Republican is also being strategic in his relationship with Trump, going so far as to defend the new president when his Republican colleagues have been reluctant. When Trump repeated his claim that millions voted illegally in the election, Paul didnt dismiss the lie. He blamed the media for being fixated on the claim. When Trump criticized civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis, Paul said the Georgia Democrat wasnt immune to criticism. When criminal justice reform advocates pushed Paul to vote against Sen. Jeff Sessions, he decided to stand by one of Trumps closest allies.

Even when he has voted against the new presidents priorities, he doesnt criticize the president himself. In just the first few weeks of 115th Congress, Pauls political calculation is evident: He will pick his battles with Trump carefully in exchange for more credibility when he tries to inject his libertarian views in the debate over repealing and replacing Obamacare, foreign policy, and the budget.

I think hes really doing what an outspoken leader in a co-equal branch should be doing, said Jesse Benton, formerly a longtime adviser to both Rand and Ron Paul. Where there is agreement with Trump, he is agreeing and giving praise; where there is disagreement, he is disagreeing in a statesmanlike way.

Paul may no longer be the most interesting man in America, as a 2014 Time magazine cover proclaimed, but from Morning Joe to regular hits on CNN and Fox News, hes making an effort to be seen as the libertarian voice in Congress after a rocky presidential bid where he tried to fit in more with mainstream Republicans. GOP operatives and activists stress there isnt anywhere close to the same level of interest in him they had two years ago, but they are tuning into this new chapter of Pauls career.

I was really quiet in my first term, and now Im going to be less bashful, Paul said facetiously in a quick interview.

(He immediately added, Thats just meant in a humorous way.)

On a more serious note, Paul added: I do want to be involved and try to shape the debate. If you dont speak out, you dont shape the debate.

After dropping out of the presidential race last February, Paul quietly got through the 2016 election, winning another term while staying out of the national spotlight. While his vulnerable GOP colleagues were carefully toeing the line between criticizing then-candidate Trump and not turning off the support of Trump voters, Paul kept his promise to back the GOP nominee and didnt try to distance himself from him, given Trumps popularity in Kentucky.

But his quiet interlude ended almost immediately after he was re-elected to a new term, as President-elect Trump worked on his cabinet picks. The Kentucky Republican repeatedly said in interviews he wouldnt support some of Trumps initial top choices for secretary of state that were being floated. He stressed, however, that he and Trump at least candidate Trump were on the same page. I think an unrepentant advocate of the Iraq War doesnt really fit with Donald Trumps pronouncements throughout the campaign, Paul said at the time.

With Republicans holding only a one-seat advantage on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Paul had some clout, and he used it to push for a noninterventionist nominee who did not support the war in Iraq, as members of the hawkish wing of the party continued to call him an outlier. You can put the Republicans in a very small car who are going to follow Rand Pauls advice when it comes to national security, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said at the time.

In the end, however, Trump nominated ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson, who told Paul during his confirmation hearing he thought the Iraq War was a mistake exactly what Paul wanted to hear from the countrys chief diplomat.

Paul used a similar tactic last week with Elliott Abrams, who worked for former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush and was believed to be under consideration to serve as Tillersons deputy. Paul opposed Abrams for ideological reasons. But he also announced his opposition to the rumors about Abrams on MSNBCs Morning Joe, a show Trump is known to watch regularly, specifically calling Abrams a NeverTrumper during the segment and stressing that Abrams was the one against Trump. A day later Abrams was reportedly out of the running after Trump learned of Abrams criticism of his candidacy last year.

Although Paul was the only Senate Republican to vote against now-CIA Director Mike Pompeo, because of the former congressmans views on surveillance and torture, he focused his criticism on Pompeo and not on Trump or the administration. In his op-ed explaining the vote, Trump wasnt mentioned even once.

On the issue Paul has been most vocal on these days repealing and replacing Obamacare he is quick to point out that Trump himself called him to discuss his plan. Within the first week of the new Congress, Paul undermined Republican leaders plan to deal with Obamacare with his loud calls to repeal and replace simultaneously. Trump called Paul after watching him talk about the issue on Fox News.

The senator immediately announced that Trump had come out in support of his plan after the call, which convinced some other congressional Republicans that repealing without replacing at the same time wasnt the way to go, making the path forward for Obamacare repeal more unpredictable.

Trump hasnt however backed Pauls specific legislation to tackle the Affordable Care Act.

In the meantime, Pauls involvement in Obamacare and foreign policy issues is bringing libertarians, who werent thrilled with Paul during his presidential bid, back on board. Libertarians are pretty excited about what weve seen, said Jonathan Bydlak, who worked on the 2008 presidential bid of Rand Pauls father, former Rep. Ron Paul. Most of us remember the Bush years where there was a unified government under Republicans, but what we got wasnt conservative policy It was a substantial growth in government. Its a time where its dangerous in a sense.

Rand is his best when libertarians are in these positions, because hes not afraid to buck his party, said Bydlack, founder and president of the Coalition to Reduce Spending, who became a conflicted Paul supporter in the 2016 election cycle.

And its not necessarily a calculated strategy, said former Paul adviser Trygve Olson. Rather, his background as an ophthalmologist with a small practice has positioned him well, given the issue matrix in the new Congress. If Rand Paul were a stock, hed probably be a good stock to buy right now, Olson said.

Hes going to be renegade, said Chris Rufer, a major libertarian donor and California-based tomato magnate.

Among more mainstream Republicans, though, a top GOP operative argues that Pauls moves arent going to garner too much interest in advancing his political career. I havent seen those tactics generate any real buzz, the operative said.

And Paul still faces the same problem hes had since he first got the Senate: Hes still going to be fairly lonely in his battles with top Republicans.

In meetings with a group of influential House conservatives known as the Freedom Caucus, Paul has tried to rally support for his ideas on the other side of Congress. He pushed them against voting for the budgetary vehicle that would set up a repeal vote for Obamacare, warning them that the budget tool being used by Republicans to fast-track the repeal would add nearly $10 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years.

But a day after Pauls lone no vote on the budget bill that would start the Obamacare repeal process in the Senate, only nine Republicans in the House voted with him. The measure passed overwhelmingly.

Kentucky GOP Rep. Thomas Massie, who was one of the nine in the House last Friday who voted with Paul, said even though they couldnt get enough support, Pauls education is whats important. On this vote here where we just voted to add over $9 trillion to the debt, he was like the icebreaker that went through the frozen water before us, he said.

This was the easiest vote in the world to oppose for me because of the stand he made in the Senate and the education he put out there. So yeah I feel like he is sort of putting up a reinvigorated fight.

Later that week, Paul continued the education by releasing details of his new Obamacare replacement legislation on a Sunday TV show. The bill has yet to find a single co-sponsor.

Read more:
How Rand Paul Is Navigating The Trump Presidency - BuzzFeed News

Rand Paul Teams Up With Cory Booker To Place Restrictions on Solitary Confinement for Juveniles – The Libertarian Republic

By: Elias J. Atienza

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) and Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) have teamed once more to reintroduce legislation on criminal justice reform. The bill, which is mostly a rehash of the one introduced in the last Congress by Booker, would restrict the use of solitary confinement for juveniles except in limited cases.

Former President Barrack Obama first initiated widespread changes in federal prisons for solitary confinement after the Justice Department recommended it, affecting some 10,000 prisons. However, it is not permanent, which is why the Paul and Booker are reintroducing the bill in order to ensure that the changes remain.

Both Paul and Obama have referred to the story of Kalief Browder, a young black man who had been sent to Rikkers Island and spent three years in prison after allegedly stealing a backpack. He was charged with second degree robbery and spent most of his time in solitary confinement. He never had a trial.

However, all charges were dropped and he was released. He committed suicide in June of 2015, most likely due to the conditions of his detention. His case has been cited for criminal justice reform, especially solitary confinement.

The bill currently has four other cosponsors, Senators Mike Lee (R-UT), Richard Durbin (D-IL), James Lankford (R-OK), and Robert Casey (D-PA).

It is unknown what President Donald Trumps position is on solitary confinement. However, due to his administrations position on criminal justice reform is not wholly positive towards it, he might overturn Obamas executive orders on solitary confinement within federal prisons. Hence the bill.

AsJean Cassella and James Ridgeway write inSolitary Watch:

Trump has long denounced what he calls criminals rights. And more broadly, since the widespread use of solitary confinement is driven by mass incarceration, Trumps general law-and-order stance, which is inhospitable to such moves as sentencing reform, could add to the federal prison population.Sessions, who has a track record on these issueshevirulentlyopposedrecent bipartisan efforts at sentencing reform and wrongly believes that crime is skyrocketingwill certainly have Trumps back.

Cory BookerCriminal Justice ReformDonald TrumpJeff SessionsKalief Browderrand paulsolitary confinement

Here is the original post:
Rand Paul Teams Up With Cory Booker To Place Restrictions on Solitary Confinement for Juveniles - The Libertarian Republic

Rand Paul: Do not let Elliott Abrams anywhere near the State …

By Sen. Rand Paul

I hope against hope that the rumors are wrong and that President Donald Trump will not open the State Department door to the neocons. Crack the door to admit Elliott Abrams and the neocons will scurry in by the hundreds.

Neoconservative interventionists have had us at perpetual war for 25 years. While President Trump has repeatedly stated his belief that the Iraq War was a mistake, the neocons (all of them Never-Trumpers) continue to maintain that the Iraq and Libyan Wars were brilliant ideas. These are the same people who think we must blow up half the Middle East, then rebuild it and police it for decades.

Theyre wrong and they should not be given a voice in this administration.

RELATED:Rand Paul: Repeal all of Obamacare and replace immediately

One of the things I like most about President Trump is his acknowledgement that nation building does not work and actually works against the nation building we need to do here at home. With a $20 trillion debt, we dont have the money to do both.

I urge him to keep that in mind this week when he meets with Elliott Abrams, the rumored pick for second in command to the Secretary of State.

Abrams would be a terrible appointment for countless reasons. He doesnt agree with the president in so many areas of foreign policy and he has said so repeatedly; he is a loud voice for nation building and when asked about the presidentsopposition to nation building, Abrams said that Trump wasabsolutely wrong; and during the election he was unequivocal in his opposition to Donald Trump, going so far as to say, the chair in which Washington and Lincoln sat, he is not fit to sit.

Why then would the president trust him with the second most powerful position in the State Department?

Abrams was equally dismissive throughout Trumps entire candidacy. As a Never-Trumper, he repeatedly said he would neither vote for Clinton nor Trump. He likened the choice to the one the nation faced of McGovern vs. Nixon.

I voted for Rex Tillerson for secretary of state because I believe him to have a balanced approach to foreign policy. My hope is that he will put forward a realist approach. I dont see Abrams as part of any type of foreign policy realism.

Elliott Abrams is a neoconservative too long in the tooth to change his spots, and the president should have no reason to trust that he would carry out a Trump agenda rather than a neocon agenda.

But just as importantly, Congress has good reason not to trust him he was convicted of lying to Congress in his previous job.

His conviction for deceiving Congress over secret arms deals, better known as the Iran-Contra scandal, show that his neocon agenda trumps his fidelity to the rule of law. The Constitution directs Congress to approve or disapprove of war. It would be a mistake to appoint anyone to the State Department who was previously convicted for defying Congressional authority.

Nation building in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen has not and will not work. Mr. President please, please do not open the door to the people who sip lattes while sneering behind your back. They are bold enough to come begging for work while continuing to laugh and deride your every remark concerning foreign policy. Dont let them in!

The neocon trademark is to conduct war in secret to avoid congressional scrutiny. This is exactly what happened during Iran-Contra. Despite legislation that prohibited sending arms to Nicaragua, Abrams and other neocons surreptitiously funneled money from sultans in Brunei to sheiks in Iran, converting the cash into weapons that were then sent to authoritarians in Nicaragua.

RELATED:Rand Paul: Will Donald Trump betray voters by hiring John Bolton?

Abrams also supervised, covered up and defended a policy of arming a Guatemalan government undeniably waging war against an indigenous native population. Thousands of the indigenous people of the Ixil region of Guatemala were exterminated. The Guatemalan President was eventually convicted of war crimes. Abrams was an unabashed supporter and organizer of sending arms into this tragic situation.

In a country of 300 million people, surely there are reasonable foreign policy experts who have not been convicted of deceiving Congress and actually share the presidents foreign policy views. I hope Secretary Rex Tillerson will continue the search for expert assistance from experienced, non-convicted diplomats who understand the mistakes of the past and the challenges ahead.

Originally posted here:
Rand Paul: Do not let Elliott Abrams anywhere near the State ...