Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul was vindicated this week regarding COVID. Will Democrats and …

Provided by Washington Examiner

At the peak of the pandemic, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) was censored by Big Tech. He was insulted, ridiculed, mocked, and scorned for many of his claims regarding COVID-19. Whether it was the efficacy of masks or the virus's origins, the Left's Big Tech henchmen did everything possible to suppress Paul's voice because they disagreed with his assertions.

They were wrong, as we now know, and they owe Paul an apology.

BIDEN'S DEI DEBACLE

The U.S. Energy Department and the FBI now agree that a lab leak is probably to blame for the spread of the COVID-19 virus, according to reports. The disclosure was made in "low confidence" earlier this week after the department received new intelligence on the matter, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The Energy Department oversees 17 national labs and research centers and was investigating the pandemic's origins. Meanwhile, the Energy Department's admission was just the latest in a recent string of evidence vindicating Paul. A new study released this month revealed that immunity from a natural COVID infection was "at least as high, if not higher" than receiving the vaccine. Paul said this last year but was dismissed by many on the Left as spreading misinformation.

"The science is against you on this. The science is clear," Paul said at the time, citing an Israeli study that supported his claim. "Naturally acquired immunity is as good as a vaccine."

Paul was heavily criticized by those on the Left for saying the same thing the Energy Department just now concluded. He was censored by Big Tech and vilified by Democratic politicians who claimed Paul's now-vindicated assertions were detrimental to the country. But it was Big Tech and the Democrats who were harming the country, not the Kentucky Republican.

"Trust the science" evolved into "trust the tyrants," and the Left sought total compliance to its authoritarianism during the pandemic. Anyone objecting, such as Paul, was vilified as an ignorant conspiracy theorist and, in some cases, accomplice to murder. What happened to Paul should serve as a warning of left-wing, Democratic totalitarianism and why they can never be trusted to regulate speech or information. Liberals, Democrats, the Left, and Big Tech all owe Rand Paul an apology. Will they ever do so?

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Washington Examiner Videos

Tags: Opinion, Beltway Confidential, Commentary Writer, Rand Paul, Coronavirus

Original Author: Christopher Tremoglie

Original Location: Rand Paul was vindicated this week regarding COVID. Will Democrats and Big Tech ever apologize?

Go here to see the original:
Rand Paul was vindicated this week regarding COVID. Will Democrats and ...

10 years ago today, Rand Pauls famous filibuster drastically changed …

On March 6, 2013, Sen. Rand Paul held a marathon 13-hour filibuster of John Brennans nomination to head the CIA. He began speaking at 11:47 AM on Wednesday and ended at 12:39 AM early Thursday morning.

It was a long night.

The issue: Potential drone strikes on American citizens. At the time, this was something Brennan and the Obama administration would not clearly say it did not have the constitutional authority to do.

Sen. Paul needed to hear Brennan say precisely that.

Droning American citizens was also something the Obama administration had carried out in 2011, including the killing of an American minor abroad. As the New York Times recounted in July 2012, The first strike, on Sept. 30, killed a group of people including Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical Muslim cleric who was born in New Mexico, and Samir Khan, a naturalized American citizen who lived at times in Queens, Long Island and North Carolina. The second, on Oct. 14, killed a group of people including Mr. Awlakis 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, who was born in Colorado.

When asked by a reporter how the Obama administration could justify the killing of a teenage American citizen with zero due process, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Abdulrahman al-Awlaki should have had a more responsible father.

So that was the political environment regarding civil liberties in 2013.

Paul said during the time of the filibuster, I have allowed the president to pick his appointees, but I will not sit quietly and let him shred the Constitution. I cannot sit at my desk quietly and let the president say he will kill Americans on American soil who are not actively attacking the country.

The reaction to Pauls act was overwhelming. The filibuster was the top story across the country, galvanizing and even uniting for a time Tea Party conservatives and hard Left progressives over the issues of due process and basic civil liberties.

The feminist antiwar group Code Pink delivered a giant pink heart praising Paul for his filibuster.

Rush Limbaugh, who had very few guests his entire radio career, invited Paul on his program, called him a hero and said the neocons are paranoid concerning the senators hawkish critics.

As a gauge of how popular and successful the filibuster had been in changing public opinion, Slates Dave Weigel noted that after a month of people still talking about Pauls stance, one poll showed there had been a A 50point swing against targeted drone killings of U.S. citizens.

Weigel observed back then, A year ago, as the presidential race was taking shape, The Washington Posts pollster asked voters whether they favored the use of drones to kill terrorists or terror suspects if they were American citizens living in other countries.

The net rating at the time was positive: 65 percent for, 26 percent against, he noted.

Then came a massive shift in opinion.

Today, after a month of Rand Paul-driven discussion of drone warfare, Gallup asks basically the same question: Should the U.S. use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against U.S. citizens living abroad who are suspected terrorists?

The new numbers: 41 percent for, 52 percent against.

Sen. Paul had taken an issue most Americans never even thought about, and to the degree that they did, a strong majority agreed with the governments position. After Paul highlighted the issue in such a spectacular manner, the majority of the public came over to his side.

That doesnt happen every day. That usually doesnt happen on any day.

Passing or stopping legislation is any member of Congresss primary job. But if some are lucky, they might get to change hearts and minds.

For one heady moment in 2013, Rand Paul did just that.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

See original here:
10 years ago today, Rand Pauls famous filibuster drastically changed ...

Bill Straub: As 24 Republican race for president heats up, is Rand …

Sen. Rand Paul ran an infamously inept campaign for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016 when he was under the delusion that the time had arrived when the nation couldnt live without him.

So, having fallen on his face in pursuit of the White House once, might he settle for the number two job instead?

The Republican race for president in 2024 is undoubtedly going to heat up sooner rather than later with the primary season less than a year away. Several contenders are indicating they arent intimidated by the presence of former President Donald J. Trump who, as the result of pending criminal investigations, may face reduced time on the campaign trail anyway.

Former United Nations Ambassador and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley has already entered the contest with Trump, maintaining the time has arrived for a new generation to take command, contrasting her relative youth with The Donalds 76 years. But theres questions about her appeal to the new, confrontational, and aggressive Republican Party that Trump has wrought.

That old book banner, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Trump without the personality, is also taking a look-see and is expected to take the plunge.

Others more in the also-ran category are trying to keep their names above sea level hoping for some opportunity to present itself. That list includes former Vice President Mike Pence, who likely will be the target of Trumps wrath if he dips his toe in, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is an unlikely recipient of unbounded GOP adoration, and South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, who may throw her name out there if she believes it will place her on a glide path to the vice presidency.

Of the bunch youd have to like Trump, who has created a real cult of personality within the party, as unsettling as that reality might be. Hes obviously the best known, hell have plenty of dough as long as no one asks where it came from, and if more than two or three others enter the race theyll likely knock each other out. DeSantis is thought to be gaining ground, but how much appeal he might generate among general election voters might scare some GOP regulars off.

Regardless, whoever grabs the ring is going to need a running mate and Paul, R-Bowling Green, is a name making the Republican rounds. Paul Bedard, a writer for the Washington Examiner, sort of a house organ for DC right-wingers, recently claimed that Paul, according to the headline accompanying the article, could be the secret to winning the White House.

While there are a lot of choices, the early betting is on a Capitol Hill firebrand uniquely poised to bring in the libertarian wing of the GOP, a bump of potentially 3%-4% of the vote, Bedard wrote.

And that firebrand? Rand Paul, of course.

Bedard quoted an individual he identified as an adviser to House Republicans who is also close to several past conservative presidential candidates, unidentified, of course, who said Paul as VP eliminates the need for a libertarian nominee or third-party candidate. And having that extra 3 percent-4 percent moving to the Republican ticket in 10-12 key states would be the margin of victory.

Well, maybe. But any party counting on the vice-presidential nominee to bolster the vote by more than a handful of votes, not to mention his or her home state, probably is whistling past the graveyard.

But it figures that Paul, at this stage, merits consideration in a party where cruelty and callousness are considered assets. He has frequently shown that he is more than willing to take on the so-called deep state, harassing Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Bidens one-time chief health advisor who led that fight against COVID-19, in an unusually nasty fashion. He undoubtedly will be willing to take on woke Democrats whatever the hell woke is supposed to mean and he is not particularly fond of government even though he is part of it.

It should also be noted that he was most recently re-elected to the Senate in 2022 for a third term, which means he will retain his seat for four more years should any ticket hes hooked on lose. Hes palsy-walsy with Trump, even though the two insulted each other incessantly during the 2016 campaign. They kissed and made up where every Republican works things out on the golf course. DeSantis might want him, should he win the nomination, as a means of convincing Trump loyalists, whose hair will be on fire should their messiah lose, to jump aboard.

Thats not to say Paul would be a perfect choice. He is not the chambers biggest supporter of the military, taking, for the most part, an isolationist view and heres the rub suggesting that it might be necessary to cut the defense budget to bring spending under control.

Paul is not thrilled with the situation in Ukraine. He once held up $40 million in aid to Kyiv and has in the past been blacklisted by the government there. It should be noted that status may not hurt him with Republican primary voters, who are growing in their opposition to U.S spending and involvement. At the same time it might be poison to be considered pro-Russia, something any intraparty opposition that crops up will be sure to use against him.

In his most recent phony-baloney budget proposal something he offers to reduce the debt every year Paul suggested 6 percent cuts across the board, excluding Social Security but including Medicare and Medicaid. In the past, however, he has suggested raising the age for Social Security eligibility and some sort of means testing for the program. That might not play well.

But Paul is a White guy from a reliably Republican state with a modest national following, an ultra-conservative voting record on domestic issues and a mean streak. If that doesnt fill out the partys job requirements nothing does. If he can somehow develop a personality within the next few months you might have a winner.

There is one good thing if Paul is the GOP candidate for vice president somebody even worse wont get it.

Its been suggested that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-GA, and erstwhile Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, two legitimate whackos, are thought to be jockeying for the slot. And if Trump takes the crown, anything is possible.

In that case, no matter how hard it might be, its a case of Go Rand Go.

See more here:
Bill Straub: As 24 Republican race for president heats up, is Rand ...

5 Things You Should Know About Sen. Rand Paul – NPR

Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an ophthalmologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school. Joe Imel/AP hide caption

Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an ophthalmologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul announced his bid for the White House Tuesday on his website. The 52-year-old former ophthalmologist's libertarian roots sets him apart from the expansive field of Republican hopefuls, most notably in foreign policy and issues like defense spending.

His father Ron Paul, also a physician, gained notoriety in the late-1980s as a presidential nominee for the Libertarian Party, but there are signs the younger Paul is moving more mainstream Republican.

Here are five things you may not know, or remember, about Rand Paul:

He doesn't have a bachelor's degree.

Paul holds a medical degree from Duke University, but he was a few courses shy of earning a bachelor's degree from Baylor University. The Kentucky senator was enrolled at the Texas Christian college, where he studied biology and English, from fall 1981 to summer 1984. He left the program after receiving his acceptance to medical school. At the time, Duke did not require a bachelor's degree for admittance, but the policy has since changed.

A fact-check conducted by The Washington Post revealed two instances on the same day in February where Paul stated that he held degrees in biology and English. A spokesman for the senator later argued to the paper that a medical degree is a biology degree.

He worked on his father's presidential campaign while attending medical school.

Despite the demanding workload of medical school, Paul worked as a volunteer for his father, Ron Paul's 1988 Libertarian Party campaign for president. According to The New York Times, the two would hold regular debates during road trips on topics such as foreign policy and military interventions, with the younger Paul taking stances that skewed closer to Republican ideology.

His father's campaign ultimately garnered less than 1 percent of the vote.

He founded an eye care clinic to aid low-income people.

Paul founded the Southern Kentucky Lions Eye Clinic, which provides free exams and surgeries to those in need, in 1995.

The senator told National Review in 2013 that he has performed more than 100 pro bono surgeries.

"There's a philosophic debate which often gets me in trouble, you know, on whether health care's a right or not," he said at a Q&A at the University of Louisville. "I think we as physicians have an obligation. As Christians, we have an obligation. ... I really believe that, and it's a deep-held belief."

He stood on the Senate floor for nearly 13 hours during a filibuster.

In March 2013, Paul took the Senate floor for 12 hours and 52 minutes in what Slate called a "(mostly) one-man show" of a filibuster, ahead of a vote to confirm John Brennan as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The speech aimed to increase criticism of the Obama administration's drone policy.

Still, the diatribe was just over half the time spent by record-holder Strom Thurmond, the late South Carolina senator, who spoke for more than 24 hours nonstop in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

He's faced multiple plagiarism accusations.

Charges of plagiarism first arose in October 2013 when MSNBC host Rachel Maddow pointed out that a portion of Paul's speech supporting gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli bore a striking resemblance to the Wikipedia page for the dystopian science fiction film Gattaca. Speaking against abortion rights activists, the senator allegedly lifted four lines from the entry.

BuzzFeed later found another similar instance where Paul recited word-for-word text from the Wikipedia entry for the movie Stand and Deliver in a June 2013 speech on immigration.

But the most damning incident occurred when The Washington Times ended the senator's weekly column after a review of his work found that he copied a passage from The Week magazine that had been published a week prior.

According to The Washington Times, Paul took some responsibility but mostly blamed the episodes on staff providing him background material that wasn't properly footnoted.

Here is the original post:
5 Things You Should Know About Sen. Rand Paul - NPR

Dr. Rand Paul Announces 2023 Service Academy Nominations

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

February 23, 2023

Contact: Press_Paul@paul.senate.gov, 202-224-4343

BOWLING GREEN, KY Today, U.S. Senator Rand Paul issued the following statement after announcing his nominations to the U.S. service academies, consisting of 37 nominations to individuals from across the Commonwealth of Kentucky:

A very rewarding aspect of being a United States Senator is the opportunity to nominate young men and women from across the state to attend our nations prestigious service academies. I commend each of these students for their dedication and desire to serve in the United States military, and I wish them the best through the remainder of the selection process. I have no doubt the students chosen will proudly represent the Commonwealth of Kentucky in the service academies,said Dr. Paul.

Dr. Paul nominated the following individuals to the U.S. Air Force Academy, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, the U.S. Military Academy, and the U.S. Naval Academy:

United States Air Force Academy

United States Merchant Marine Academy

United States Military Academy

United States Naval Academy

###

See the article here:
Dr. Rand Paul Announces 2023 Service Academy Nominations