Rand Paul, pragmatic deal-maker? Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.
Late last week, Donald Trump revived repeal and delay the GOPs short-lived plan to kill Obamacare first, and draft a replacement second. GOP senators Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and Ben Sasse promptly endorsed this way out of their partys health-care quagmire.
Most observers saw these developments as threatening Mitch McConnells fragile hopes of bridging his caucuss divide on health-care policy. Politico declared, Trump further disrupts Obamacare repeal efforts.
But it now looks like the opposite may prove true: The reemergence of the strategy of repealing Obamacare in one bill, and replacing it in another, might just lay the foundation for the Senate GOPs grand bargain over health care. Observe how Rand Paul described his vision for clean repeal on Fox News Sunday:
Lets do clean repeal like we promised, and, I think, you can get 52 Republicans for clean repeal. You can have a simultaneous bill or a concurrent bill that they can call replace, and that I think, perhaps, if its big spending, they could probably get Democrats to go along with big spending. Im not for that, but Im saying, I want repeal to work, and the way you do it is you separate into two bills and you do it concurrently.
In other words, Paul is asking leadership to give conservatives one more chance to register their symbolic opposition to Obamacare, for old times sake and then, immediately pass a big spending bipartisan bill that props up the existing law, with moderate Republican and Democratic votes.
Its hard to imagine a better way for an arch-libertarian who represents Kentucky to have his ideological purity and keep his states rural hospitals running, too.
But Paul wasnt the only one endorsing this sort of scheme.
Id like to say lets do the repeal and then lets try to get 60 out of 100 senators, Sasse told CNN. The Nebraska senator suggested that, unlike Paul, he would favor an extended period of legislative deliberation between Obamacares repeal and its replacement. But, nonetheless, his suggestion that the bill pass with 60 votes is a tacit endorsement of a legislative process that ends with technocratic fixes to the existing law (which Trump could then rebrand as his own).
Its possible that Sasses insistence on 60 votes has less to do with an attraction to bipartisanship than frustration with the limits of reconciliation the legislative process that allows the Senate to pass bills with a simple majority. Right now, Senate conservatives have their hearts set on rolling back Obamacares regulatory protections for people with preexisting conditions. But under the rules of reconciliation, the Senate can only pass measures that have a direct impact on the budget, and its unlikely that regulatory reforms would meet that standard.
Still, whatever Sasses motivation, a modest bill fortifying the private market is the only thing that could get eight Democratic votes.
And, over the weekend, White House Director for Legislative Affairs Marc Short endorsed such a legislative endgame.
If the replacement part is too difficult for Republicans to come together, then lets go back and take care of the first step and repeal, Short told Fox News Sunday. And then at that point, if youve repealed it, you can come back with a replacement effort that could be more bipartisan.
Maine senator Susan Collins has long favored a bipartisan bill. Kansass Jerry Moran expressed a similar sentiment this week.
And on Thursday, even McConnell seemed to signal that a bipartisan bill may be nigh, saying, If my side is unable to agree on an adequate replacement, then some kind of action with regard to private-health-insurance markets must occur.
Republican senators appear to have irreconcilable disagreements about health-care policy. But thats only true to the extent that they actually care about health-care policy. It seems possible that what the conservatives really care about is performing rituals of ideological purity while the moderates just want to avoid throwing hundreds of thousands of their constituents off health insurance for the sake of affirming some lies they sold voters about Obamacare.
If thats the case, then pseudo-repeal and bipartisan replace might be the grand bargain theyve been searching for.
There were no injuries, but the minor derailment caused more even delays at the troubled station.
Doctors said the congressman, who was shot last month, tolerated the procedure well.
The erosion of global power tends to become evident in a crisis.
A vote crucially affected by, say, foreign interference might be an injury without an obvious Constitutional remedy.
Let conservatives vote to fully repeal Obamacare then have moderates and Democrats immediately pass a bill strengthening the law.
The Trump administration wants to make space great again, too.
Seismic air-gun blasts help detect oil reserves. They also kill zooplankton the basis of every ocean food web. Trump is about to lift a ban on them.
Pat Toomey spills a secret: Republicans didnt have a policy plan because they didnt think theyd have the power to enact it.
The Atlantic City casino is having a liquidation sale.
Walter Shaub Jr. has clashed with the White House for months. Now hes leaving the government altogether.
The Education secretary is blocking new rules that would make it easier for students defrauded by for-profit colleges to have their debts forgiven.
White House staff reportedly started looking too late.
Agata Kornhauser-Duda avoided shaking the presidents hand like a pro.
The Trump administration is now openly threatening to use the Justice Department as a tool for punishing critical speech.
Trump lavishes praise on Poland, reaffirms his commitment to NATO, and even brings up Russia to a cheering audience.
Initially praised as brilliant, Cruzs idea of letting insurers offer cheap, skimpy health plans is now looking like a deadly threat to sick people.
Something will have to be done about North Korea, Trump told reporters in Poland.
The president displays his signature alt-arguments on the international stage.
After several decades, the effort to build a U.S. missile shield has had only mixed results.
Original post:
Senate Republicans May Have Found Their Health-Care Compromise - New York Magazine