Why Rand Paul Is Telling Everyone He #39;s A Fan Of Vaccines
Sen. Rand Paul is trying to clarify his position on vaccines, as his previous ties to anti-vaccine groups come to light. Follow Sebastian Martinez: http://www.twitter.com/sebastiansings See...
By: Newsy Politics
Continue reading here:
Why Rand Paul Is Telling Everyone He's A Fan Of Vaccines - Video
Rand Paul Injected With Deadly Virus To Save His Ass
"Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is moving into damage control mode after his controversial comments on the measles vaccine put the 2016 contender at odds with the vast majority of his party. After...
By: The Young Turks
Follow this link:
Rand Paul Injected With Deadly Virus To Save His Ass - Video
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday continued to walk back his comments that parents should be allowed to choose whether to vaccinate their children, saying he holds the same position as President Barack Obama on the matter.
"I got annoyed that people were trying to depict me as someone who doesn't think vaccines were a good idea," Paul told Fox News host Greta Van Susteren on Wednesday, noting that he had been vaccinated before a recent trip to Guatemala and had vaccinated his children.
"I'm not sure I'm different from the president or anyone else on the position," Paul said. "We have rules to encourage people to have vaccines in the country, but I don't think anybody's recommending that we hold them down."
Pressed by Van Susteren on whether vaccinations should be required when an illness could spread to other children, Paul said certain school vaccine requirements were already "somewhat of a mandate," but really more of an encouragement.
"Interestingly, 48 out of 50 states do have a religious as well as philosophic exemption if you have a problem," Paul said.
Paul has faced heavy criticism since Monday, when he said vaccinations for children should be voluntary, and suggested a relationship between vaccinations and mental disorders.
"I've heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children, who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines," Paul said. "I'm not arguing that vaccines are a bad idea, I think they're a good thing. But I think parents should have some input."
Paul softened those comments on Tuesday, saying he believes children should be vaccinated. He said he didn't mean to suggest that vaccinations cause mental disabilities.
During an interview with NBC's Savannah Guthrie on Wednesday, President Barack Obama said parents should get their kids vaccinated.
"The science is, you know, pretty indisputable," Obama said. "Weve looked at this again and again. There is every reason to get vaccinated, but there arent reasons to not."
Read this article:
Rand Paul Now Says He Shares Obama's Position On Vaccinations
A few months ago, we mused about whether Rand Paul'salmost-ceaseless media-seeking strategy was sustainable. After this week, we're leaning strongly toward 'no.'
And Paul, in large part, has himself to blame.
After vaccines suddenly became the political topic du jour, the Kentucky GOP senatortook to Laura Ingraham's radio show and CNBC on Monday and weighed in on the topic. The latter interview is the one that blew up. Appearing on the show to talk about something else, the host instead started with a fewquestions about vaccines. It didn't go well.
Paul soon ventured into conspiracy-theory territory, saying, "I have heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines." He also said that, while he vaccinates his children, he spaces out the vaccines to cut down on potential harmful effects.
The problem with this, in case you've been under a rock for three days, is that there's absolutely no evidence that vaccines cause "mental disorders." The one study that connected them to an increase in autism has been retracted and thoroughly discredited. What's more, the effectiveness of vaccines for diseases, such as measles, relies on near-universal participation -- something that becomes much harder to achieve if people think they might cause "profound mental disorders."
Amidplenty of criticism,Paul assured us all that he's not anti-vaccine. On Tuesday afternoon, he tweeted a photo of himself getting a conveniently timed booster shot and issued a statement:
I did not say vaccines caused disorders, just that they were temporally related I did not allege causation. I support vaccines, I receive them myself and I had all of my children vaccinated.
The vaccine controversyis the subject of a great story looking at Paul's 2016 presidential prospectsin Thursday's Post by David A. Fahrenthold and Matea Gold. Everyone should read it.
To give Paul the benefit of the doubt here, it's true that some have incorrectly characterizedhis CNBC comments as saying vaccines *in fact* causedmental disorders. He didn't say this. What he did do was strongly suggest it was possible.
But that, in and of itself, is a no-no. As a politician, your job is to be careful with your words. By even bringing up the "temporally related" vaccines and "profound mental disorders," you are suggesting that it's quite possible there is a link between them. If you don't think it's a distinct possibility, you just don't say something like that. Anybody watching him say what he said would draw a line between those two things.
See the rest here:
The Fix: Rand Paul has a victim complex
A few months ago, we mused about whether Rand Paul'salmost-ceaseless media-seeking strategy was sustainable. After this week, we're leaning strongly toward 'no.'
And Paul, in large part, has himself to blame.
After vaccines suddenly became the political topic du jour, the Kentucky GOP senatortook to Laura Ingraham's radio show and CNBC on Monday and weighed in on the topic. The latter interview is the one that blew up. Appearing on the show to talk about something else, the host instead started with a fewquestions about vaccines. It didn't go well.
Paul soon ventured into conspiracy-theory territory, saying, "I have heard of many tragic cases of walking, talking, normal children who wound up with profound mental disorders after vaccines." He also said that, while he vaccinates his children, he spaces out the vaccines to cut down on potential harmful effects.
The problem with this, in case you've been under a rock for three days, is that there's absolutely no evidence that vaccines cause "mental disorders." The one study that connected them to an increase in autism has been retracted and thoroughly discredited. What's more, the effectiveness of vaccines for diseases, such as measles, relies on near-universal participation -- something that becomes much harder to achieve if people think they might cause "profound mental disorders."
Amidplenty of criticism,Paul assured us all that he's not anti-vaccine. On Tuesday afternoon, he tweeted a photo of himself getting a conveniently timed booster shot and issued a statement:
I did not say vaccines caused disorders, just that they were temporally related I did not allege causation. I support vaccines, I receive them myself and I had all of my children vaccinated.
The vaccine controversyis the subject of a great story looking at Paul's 2016 presidential prospectsin Thursday's Post by David A. Fahrenthold and Matea Gold. Everyone should read it.
To give Paul the benefit of the doubt here, it's true that some have incorrectly characterizedhis CNBC comments as saying vaccines *in fact* causedmental disorders. He didn't say this. What he did do was strongly suggest it was possible.
But that, in and of itself, is a no-no. As a politician, your job is to be careful with your words. By even bringing up the "temporally related" vaccines and "profound mental disorders," you are suggesting that it's quite possible there is a link between them. If you don't think it's a distinct possibility, you just don't say something like that. Anybody watching him say what he said would draw a line between those two things.
Visit link:
Rand Paul has a victim complex