TCR Live #29 feat John Vibes: Voting, Government gun-running, Conscious Resistance
On this episode of The Conscious Resistance Live Derrick Broze covers the recent elections and voting, as well as exposed government gun running operations, and the lies of Rand Paul. Also...
By: The Conscious Resistance
Follow this link:
TCR Live #29 feat John Vibes: Voting, Government gun-running, Conscious Resistance - Video
"Wayne Gretzky" is "Rand Paul" And yes "Walter Gretzky" is "Ron Paul" Rage on haters
Thanks Chado for the Picture, HOWE free as a side note, By the way after looking a "Gordie Howe" he and Wayne seem to have a strange relationship. I will look into that as well.
By: dave j
More:
"Wayne Gretzky" is "Rand Paul" And yes "Walter Gretzky" is "Ron Paul" Rage on haters - Video
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) says fellow Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul can "count" on him if he makes a White House bid.
"I don't think he's made a final decision on that. But he'll be able to count on me," McConnell told the Lexington Herald-LeaderThursday. "Obviously, I'm a big supporter of Rand Paul. We've developed a very tight relationship, and I'm for him."
Paul was a key backer of McConnell's in his reelection campaign. He endorsed the GOP leader early, when the threat of a strong tea party challenger was looming. Jesse Benton, a top Paul ally, ran McConnell's campaign for much of the 2014 election cycle.
Paul has not yet said whether he will run for president. He has said he plans to decide by next spring.
McConnell won reelection over Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes on Tuesday. He is poised to become the next Senate majority leader after the GOP swept to power in the upper chamber.
Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.
View original post here:
McConnell: Rand Paul can count on me if he runs for ...
By Ashley Killough, CNN
updated 11:18 AM EST, Mon November 10, 2014
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Washington (CNN) -- Sen. Rand Paul declared the war against ISIS "illegal" in a new opinion piece Monday, urging conservatives to speak out against President Barack Obama's decision not to seek congressional authorization for military action against the terrorist group.
"This war is now illegal. It must be declared and made valid, or it must be ended," the Kentucky Republican wrote in an op-ed published Monday by the Daily Beast.
The U.S. began airstrikes in Iraq in early August and in Syria in September, citing a 2001 measure known as the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) as the president's legal basis for going after terrorist threats.
Paul cites the War Powers Resolution of 1973 in stressing his long-held position that all military action must be approved by Congress. The exception is when a situation is considered urgent. In that case, a president has 60 days to get authorization after military action. If there's no approval from Congress, the president has 30 days to end the mission.
Rand Paul plants feet between both sides of foreign policy debate
While Paul said he doesn't think the War Powers Resolution specifically applies to the ISIS situation -- because the U.S. had not been attacked -- he notes that even if it did, the president's time would be up.
"Taking military action against ISIS is justified. The president acting without Congress is not," he wrote, reiterating a stance he's held since September. This fall Paul has described the airstrikes in Syria as appropriate action but said Obama's method for doing so was "unconstitutional."
Read the original here:
Rand Paul on ISIS response: 'This war is now illegal'
By Ashley Killough, CNN
November 10, 2014 -- Updated 1618 GMT (0018 HKT)
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Washington (CNN) -- Sen. Rand Paul declared the war against ISIS "illegal" in a new opinion piece Monday, urging conservatives to speak out against President Barack Obama's decision not to seek congressional authorization for military action against the terrorist group.
"This war is now illegal. It must be declared and made valid, or it must be ended," the Kentucky Republican wrote in an op-ed published Monday by the Daily Beast.
The U.S. began airstrikes in Iraq in early August and in Syria in September, citing a 2001 measure known as the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) as the president's legal basis for going after terrorist threats.
Paul cites the War Powers Resolution of 1973 in stressing his long-held position that all military action must be approved by Congress. The exception is when a situation is considered urgent. In that case, a president has 60 days to get authorization after military action. If there's no approval from Congress, the president has 30 days to end the mission.
Rand Paul plants feet between both sides of foreign policy debate
While Paul said he doesn't think the War Powers Resolution specifically applies to the ISIS situation -- because the U.S. had not been attacked -- he notes that even if it did, the president's time would be up.
"Taking military action against ISIS is justified. The president acting without Congress is not," he wrote, reiterating a stance he's held since September. This fall Paul has described the airstrikes in Syria as appropriate action but said Obama's method for doing so was "unconstitutional."
See the rest here:
Rand Paul: War on ISIS 'is now illegal'