Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul Politely Schools Aggressive CNN Anchor(Nov. 5th, 2014) – Video


Rand Paul Politely Schools Aggressive CNN Anchor(Nov. 5th, 2014)
Sen. Paul joined CNN #39;s New Day to discuss the new Republican congress FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes...

By: paulb0t

Read more:
Rand Paul Politely Schools Aggressive CNN Anchor(Nov. 5th, 2014) - Video

Politics for People Who Hate Politics: Ew, There Was an Election Special – Video


Politics for People Who Hate Politics: Ew, There Was an Election Special
Our cranky, liberty-loving panel discussed such things as the midterms, ignoring the midterms, why we should vote or not, and whether Rand Paul has any antiwar bonafides. Host: Lucy Steigerwald:...

By: Lucy Steigerwald

Follow this link:
Politics for People Who Hate Politics: Ew, There Was an Election Special - Video

Rand wonders if Hillary can handle campaign rigors – Video


Rand wonders if Hillary can handle campaign rigors
John King, Jackie Kucinich and Jonathan Martin discuss Rand Paul #39;s comments that campaigns can be taxing to go through.

By: CNN

See the article here:
Rand wonders if Hillary can handle campaign rigors - Video

Rand Paul: War on ISIS is illegal – Video


Rand Paul: War on ISIS is illegal
Sen. Rand Paul declared the war against ISIS "illegal," stating it must be made valid or end.

By: CNN

View post:
Rand Paul: War on ISIS is illegal - Video

Rand Paul: ISIS war is ‘illegal’ – CNN.com

By Ashley Killough, CNN

updated 11:18 AM EST, Mon November 10, 2014

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Washington (CNN) -- Sen. Rand Paul declared the war against ISIS "illegal" in a new opinion piece Monday, urging conservatives to speak out against President Barack Obama's decision not to seek congressional authorization for military action against the terrorist group.

"This war is now illegal. It must be declared and made valid, or it must be ended," the Kentucky Republican wrote in an op-ed published Monday by the Daily Beast.

The U.S. began airstrikes in Iraq in early August and in Syria in September, citing a 2001 measure known as the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) as the president's legal basis for going after terrorist threats.

Paul cites the War Powers Resolution of 1973 in stressing his long-held position that all military action must be approved by Congress. The exception is when a situation is considered urgent. In that case, a president has 60 days to get authorization after military action. If there's no approval from Congress, the president has 30 days to end the mission.

Rand Paul plants feet between both sides of foreign policy debate

While Paul said he doesn't think the War Powers Resolution specifically applies to the ISIS situation -- because the U.S. had not been attacked -- he notes that even if it did, the president's time would be up.

"Taking military action against ISIS is justified. The president acting without Congress is not," he wrote, reiterating a stance he's held since September. This fall Paul has described the airstrikes in Syria as appropriate action but said Obama's method for doing so was "unconstitutional."

Read the original here:
Rand Paul: ISIS war is 'illegal' - CNN.com